Aims. We studied the outcomes following arthroscopic primary repair of bucket handle meniscus tears to determine the incidence of re-tears and the functional outcomes of these patients. Methodology. Prospective cohort study. Over a 4-year period (2016 to 2020), 35 adult patients presented with a bucket handle tear of the meniscus. Arthroscopic meniscal repair was performed using either the all inside technique or a combination of all-inside and inside-out techniques. 15 patients also underwent simultaneous arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Functional knee scores were assessed using IKDC and Lysholm scores. Results. Mean patient age at surgery was 27 years (range, 17 to 53years). Medial meniscus was torn in 20 and lateral in 15 cases. Zone of tear was white on white in 19, red on white in 9 and red on red in 7 cases. Average delay from injury to surgery was 4 months. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, the meniscus repair failed in 3 patients (8.5 %). Outcome following re-tear was meniscus excision. Average IKDC scores in patients with intact repair were 74.04 against 56.67 in patients with a failed repair (p< 0.0001). Similarly, Lyshlom scores were 88.96 and 67.333, respectively (p<0.0001). Conclusion. The survivorship of primary repair of bucket handle meniscus tears in our series was 91.5% at medium term follow-up. Functional outcomes were significantly poor in patients with a failed repair compared to those with an intact repair

Previously, we conducted a multi-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without remplissage. The end point for the randomized controlled trial was two years post-operative, providing support for the benefits of remplissage in the short term in reducing recurrent instability. The aim of this study was to compare the medium term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of patients previously randomized to have undergone isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) for the management of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. The rate of recurrent instability and instances of re-operation were examined. The original study was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial with two 1:1 parallel groups with recruitment undertaken between 2011 and 2017. For this medium-term study, participants were reached for a telephone follow-up in 2020 and asked a series of standardized questions regarding ensuing instances of subluxation, dislocation or reoperation that had occurred on their shoulder for which they were randomized. Descriptive statistics were generated for all variables. “Failure” was defined as occurrence of a dislocation. “Recurrent instability” was defined as the participant reporting a dislocation or two or more occurences of subluxation greater than one year post-operative. All analyses were undertaken based on intention-to-treat whereby their data was analyzed based on the group to which they were originally allocated. One-hundred and eight participants were randomized of which 50 in the NO REMP group and 52 in the REMP group were included in the analyses in the original study. The mean number of months from surgery to final follow-up was 49.3 for the NO REMP group and 53.8 for the REMP group. The rates of re-dislocation or failure were 8% (4/52) in the REMP group at an average of 23.8 months post-operative versus 22% (11/50) in the NO REMP at an average of 16.5 months post-operative. The rates of recurrent instability were 10% (5/52) in the REMP group at an average of 24 months post-operative versus 30% (15/50) in the NO REMP group at an average of 19.5 months post-operative. Survival curves were significantly different favouring REMP in both scenarios. Arthroscopic Bankart repair combined with remplissage is an effective procedure in the treatment of patients with an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion and minimal glenoid bone loss (<15%). Patients can expect favourable rates of recurrent instability when compared with isolated Bankart repair at medium term follw-up

Tears of the rotator cuff tendons are a very common entity. Despite recent advances in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, the re-tear rate remains high. Thus, new methods to improve healing rates following rotator cuff repair must be sought. The purpose of this prospective randomized double-blind controlled study is to compare the functional outcomes and healing rates of an adjuvant pre-operative bone microfracture technique prior to arthroscopic cuff repair. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to receive either a percutaneous bone microfracture of the supraspinatus footprint or a “soft tissue needling” technique, in which the pin was passed through the peripheral edges of the rotator cuff, five-seven days prior to index surgery, under ultrasound guidance. Follow-ups were completed at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. Healing status was determined by ultrasound at 6 and 24 months. The primary objective was to compare the WORC score at 24 months. Secondary objectives included the healing status via ultrasound, the Constant, and the ASES scores. A sample size calculation determined that 90 patients provided 80% power to detect a statistical difference between groups. Baseline demographic data did not differ between groups. No statistical differences were detected in the WORC outcome at any time points (p=0.47, baseline, p=0.60, 3 months, p=0.79, 6 months, p=0.50, 12 months, p=0.54, 24 months). Healing rates did not differ between groups (P=0.34) and no differences were observed in the ASES or Constant Scores at all time-points. Statistically significant improvements occurred in both groups from baseline to all time points in all clinical outcome scores (p < 0 .0001). No statistically significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes were identified between pre-operative bone microfracture and soft tissue needling techniques prior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. This study does not support pre-operative microfracture as a adjuvant technique prior to arthroscopic cuff repair

Rotator cuff repair (RCR) can be performed open or arthroscopically, with a recent dramatic increase in the latter. Despite controversy about the preferred technique, there has been an increase in the number of repairs performed arthroscopically. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to compare revision rates following open and arthroscopic RCR repair. Adult patients undergoing first-time, primary rotator cuff repair in Ontario, Canada (April 2003-March 2014) were identified using physician billing and hospital databases. Patients were followed for a minimum of two and up to 13 years for the primary outcome, revision rotator cuff repair, and secondary outcome, surgical site infection. The intervention considered was open versus arthroscopic technique. Patient factors (age, gender, residence, socioeconomic status, medical comorbidities) and provider factors (surgical volume, hospital setting, worked night before, year of surgery) were recorded. Standardized mean differences were used for covariate comparison. A Cox Proportional Hazards model was used to compare RCR survivorship between the two groups after adjustment for patient and provider factors, generating hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (HR, 95% CIs). Censoring occurred on the first of the primary outcome, death, shoulder arthroplasty or arthrodesis, or the end of the follow-up period (March 2016). A total of 37,255 patients were included. The overall revision RCR rate was 2.9% (1,096 patients) with a median time to revision of 23 months (IQR 12–52). Revision repair was more common in the arthroscopic group in comparison to the open group (3.2% vs 2.6%, NNT 166.7, p=0.004), with an adjusted HR of 0.72 (0.63–0.83 95% CI, p < 0 .0001). The surgical site infection rate was significantly higher in the open group compared with the arthroscopic group (0.5% vs 0.2%, NNT 333.3, p < 0 .001). Patient and provider covariates had no statistically significant effect on revision rates, aside from increasing age (per 10 year increase, HR 0.85, 0.81–0.90 95% CI, p < 0 .0001). Revision rotator cuff repair is approximately 30% more common in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair, in comparison to open repair, after adjustment. Surgical site infection is uncommon regardless of surgical technique, however, it is slightly more common following open repair. In the setting of an economic healthcare crisis, trends of increasing arthroscopic RCR may demand scrutiny, as the technique is associated with higher revision rates and higher costs

The optimal approach to arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff is controversial, and both single row and double row fixation methods are commonly used. Which construct yields the highest efficacy is not clear. Given the current era of increasing costs in which health care delivery models are aiming for improved efficiencies and optimal outcomes, a cost-effectiveness study was performed to inform the decision making process of the utilisation of single versus double row repair. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of single row versus double row constructs in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A cost-utility analysis was performed. Health resource use and outcome data were obtained from a previous prospective randomised controlled trial in which 90 patients were randomised to two treatment arms, single row rotator cuff repair (n=48) and double row (n=42). The patients were followed over a two-year span from the time of initial surgery. Unit cost data were captured using case costs collected from the hospital database and the Ontario Schedule of Benefits. Utility values were derived from published literature. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as the difference in cost between the two types of rotator cuff fixation divided by the difference in quality adjusted life years (QALY), was determined. Double row fixation was more costly ($2,279.94 versus $1,587.37) but was more effective than the single row method (QALY of 4.073 versus 4.055). An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated to be $38,504.92 per QALY for double row fixation relative to single row. This is well below the commonly used willingness to pay threshold of $50,000/QALY. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with larger rotator cuff tears (>3cm) had a lower ICER, suggesting that double-row fixation may be more cost-effective in more severe tears. Double row rotator cuff fixation is a cost-effective option compared to single row rotator cuff repair with an ICER of $38,504.92/QALY, well within the accepted willingness to pay threshold of $50,000/QALY. Furthermore, the ICER between single and double row fixation improved with larger rotator cuff tears (>3cm), suggesting an additional benefit of a double row construct in those cases

Controversy exists regarding the optimal technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. No previous comparative trials have reported on the long-term follow-up of single and double row fixation in arthroscopic cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term functional outcomes of single-row and double-row suture techniques for repair of the rotator cuff 10-years post-operatively. Ninety patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to receive either single-row or double-row repair. The primary objective was to compare the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score 10-years post-operatively. Secondary objectives included comparison of the Constant, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and supraspinatus strength between groups. Out of 90 patients originally randomized, 57 returned for the long-term 10-year follow-up. Baseline demographic data did not differ between groups. The WORC score was not significantly different between groups at long-term follow-up (p=0.13). No statistical differences were observed between groups for the Constant (p=0.51), ASES (p=0.48) scores, or strength scores (p=0.93). A significant improvement was observed between pre-operative and the final 10-year follow-up. There were no differences observed in all outcomes between two and 10-years post-operatively. No statistically significant differences in functional or quality of life outcomes were identified between single-row and double-row fixation techniques at long-term follow-up

Introduction. The Bankart lesion is the most common form of labro-ligamentous injury in patients with traumatic dislocations of the shoulder. Various methods have been described each with its own advantages and disadvantages. We describe 5-year results of arthroscopic Bankart repair using knotless anchors. Patients and Methods. There were 38 patients, with involvement of the dominant arm in 28 patients. Recurrent dislocation was the most common indication in 21 patients, followed by first dislocation in 9 patients and second dislocation in 8 patients. All patients were done under general anesthesia and regional block in beach-chair position. Standard portals were used and repair done using 2.9 mm pushlock knotless anchors (Arthrex®). Patients had sling for 4 weeks and followed by a strict physiotherapy rehab protocol. Patients were followed up at 6 weeks and 3 monthly thereafter. Results. Only one patient had symptoms of recurrent instability, but was not keen on further surgery. Two patients had limitation of external rotation to 10 degrees. The mean Carter-Rowe score was 77.3. 90% of patients were happy to recommend surgery. Conclusion. Arthroscopic Bankart repair appears to produce good mid-term results for patients with shoulder instability

Objective. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs now yield a similar footprint as open procedures with several advantages, including reduced tissue trauma, post-operative pain, swelling, and concern about the deltoid attachment. We present a new simple and reproducible technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods. Sutures are placed through the full thickness of the rotator cuff. The suture is tied in the following manner:. Traction is released, the assistant maintaining the arm in abduction and applying tension on the anterior cuff sutures while the posterior cuff sutures are tied. The procedure is repeated for the anterior cuff suture; and. One suture strand from the anterior cuff and one suture strand from the posterior cuff are tied. The procedure is then repeated using the second strand from the anterior cuff and second suture strand from the posterior cuff. This suture and knot tying technique snugs the cuff down to the prepared tuberosity and restores the articular footprint of the cuff. This study retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcome of 170 patients who underwent arthroscopic cuff repair using this technique. Results. The mean age of the patients was 56 years (range, 29-78 years), and the mean follow-up was 38 months (range, 12-60 months). 25 % patients had a cuff tear < 1 cm, 45 % with a cuff tear size 1-3 cm, 25 % with a cuff tear size 3-5cms and 5 % with a cuff tear larger than 5 cms. All patients had improvements in pain, range of motion and strength. Significant improvements were demonstrated for Constant scores (from 42 to 87 points, P < .001). 92 % of our patients were satisfied. 80 % of patients returned to pre-injury levels of work and leisure activities. Conclusion. This study demonstrates the successful clinical outcome of the parachute technique for arthroscopic cuff repair

Our primary objective was to compare healing rates in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for degenerative tears, with and without bone channeling. Our secondary objectives were to compare disease-specific quality of life and patient reported outcomes as measured by the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Constant score between groups.

Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at three sites were randomized to receive either bone channeling augmentation or standard repair. Healing rates were determined by ultrasound at 6 and 24 months post operatively. WORC, ASES, and Constant scores were compared between groups at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post operatively.

One hundred sixty-eight patients were recruited and randomized between 2013 to 2018. Statistically significant improvements occurred in both groups from pre-operative to all time points in all clinical outcome scores (p < 0 .0001). Intention to treat analysis revealed no statistical differences in healing rates between the two interventions at 24 months post-operative. No differences were observed in WORC, ASES or Constant scores at any time-point.

This trial did not demonstrate superiority of intra-operative bone channeling in rotator cuff repair surgery at 24 months post-operative. Healing rates and patient-reported function and quality of life measures were similar between groups.

It is undetermined which factors predict return to work following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We aimed to identify which factors predicted return to work at any level, and return to pre-injury levels of work 6 months post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Multiple logistic regression analysis of prospectively collected demographic, pre-injury, preoperative, and intraoperative data from 1502 consecutive primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs, performed by a single surgeon, was performed to identify independent predictors of return to work, and return to pre-injury levels of work respectively, 6 months post-surgery.

Six months post-rotator cuff repair, 76% of patients returned to work (RTW), and 40% returned to pre-injury levels of work (Full-RTW). RTW at 6 months was likely if patients were still working after their injuries, but prior to surgery (Wald statistic [W]=55, p<0.0001), were stronger in internal rotation preoperatively (W=8, p=0.004), had full-thickness tears (W=9, p=0.002), and were female (W=5, p=0.030). Patients who achieved Full-RTW were likely to have worked less strenuously pre-injury (W=173, p<0.0001), worked more strenuously post-injury but pre-surgery (W=22, p<0.0001), had greater behind-the-back lift-off strength preoperatively (W=8, p=0.004), and had less passive external rotation range of motion preoperatively (W=5, p=0.034). Patients who were still working post-injury, but pre-surgery were 1.6-times more likely to RTW than patients who were not (p<0.0001). Patients who nominated their pre-injury level of work as “light” were 11-times more likely to achieve Full-RTW than those who nominated “strenuous” (p<0.0001).

Six months post-rotator cuff repair, a higher patient-rated post-injury, but pre-surgery level of work was the strongest predictor of RTW. A lower patient-rated pre-injury level of work was the strongest predictor of Full-RTW. Greater preoperative subscapularis strength independently predicted both RTW, and Full-RTW.

The indication for rotator cuff repair in elderly patients is controversial. Methods. Consecutive patients over the age of 70 years, under the care of a single surgeon, receiving an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were reviewed. Predominantly, a single row repair was performed using one (34 cases) or two (30) 5mm Fastin, double-loaded anchors. Double-row repair was performed in four cases. Subacromial decompression and treatment of biceps pathology were performed as necessary. Data were collected from medical records, digital radiology archives and during clinic appointments. Pain, motion, strength and function were quantified with the Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome Score, administered pre operatively and at 1-year post operatively. Ultrasound scans were performed at one year to document integrity of the repair. Results. Sixty-nine arthroscopic cuff repairs were identified in 68 patients. The mean age was 77 years (70–86). The median ASA grade was 2 (79%). The dominant side was operated on in 68% of cases. A range of tear sizes were operated on (5 small, 17 moderate, 29 large and 18 massive). The tendons involved in the tear also varied (supraspinatus 12, supra and infraspinatus 53, supraspinatus and subscapularis 2, supraspinatus infraspinatus and subscapularis 2). Re-rupture occurred in 20 cases (29%). The mean Constant score increased from 23 (95% CI 19–26) to 59 (54–64) (P< 0.001). Where the repair remained sound, Constant score improved 42 points (95%CI 36–48). If the cuff re-ruptured, constant score also increased on average 12 points (95% CI 2–21). Re-rupture rate was highest for massive cuff repairs: ten out of eighteen (56%). Conclusion. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the elderly is a successful procedure. Approximately seven out of ten repairs remained intact after one year. Even where re-rupture occurs, a significant improvement in the Constant score was found

The purpose of this study was to validate a dry model for the assessment of performance of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) and labral repair (LR). We hypothesised that the combination of a checklist and a previously validated global rating scale (GRS) would be a valid and reliable means of assessing RCR and LR when performed by residents in a dry model.

An arthroscopic RCR and LR was performed on a dry model by residents, fellows, and sports medicine staff. Any prior RCR and LR exposure was noted. Participants were given a detailed surgical manuscript and technique video before the study began. Evaluation of residents was performed by staff surgeons with task-specific checklists created using a modified Delphi procedure, and the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET). The hand movements and arthroscopic view of the procedures were recorded. Both videos were scored by a fellow blinded to the year of training of each participant.

A total of 35 residents, six fellows and five staff surgeons performed both arthroscopic RCR and LR on a dry model model (48 total). The internal reliability (Cronbach's Alpha) of the test using the total ASSET score was high (>0.8)). One-way analysis of variance for the total ASSET score and the total checklist score demonstrated a difference between participants based upon year of training (p<0.05). Post hoc analysis also demonstrated a significant difference in global ratings and checklist scores between junior residents (PGY1–3) and senior residents (PGY4&5), senior residents and fellows, and fellows and staff. A good correlation was seen between the total ASSET score and prior exposure to RCR and LR. The inter-rater reliability (ICC) between the examiner ratings and the blinded assessor ratings for the total ASSET score was good (0.8).

The results of this study provide evidence that the performance of a RCR and LR in a dry model is a valid and reliable method of assessing a resident's ability to perform these procedures, prior to performance in the operating room.

Given that there is limited time available to the surgeon in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, how is the time best spent? Should they place one Modified Mason-Allen, two mattress or four simple sutures? This study reverses current thought. In an in-vitro biomechanical single pull to failure study we compared the ultimate tensile strength of simple, mattress and grasping sutures passed with an arthroscopic suture passer (Surgical Solutions Express-Sew). The aim was to determine which suture configurations would most simply, repeatably and reliably repair the rotator cuff.

The ultimate tensile strength and mode of failure of six different suture configurations was repeatedly tested on a validated porcine rotator cuff tendon model, using a standard suture material (Number 2 Fiberwire) passed with the Surgical Solutions Express-sew, in a Hounsfield type H20K-W digital tensometer.

Standardising the number of suture passes to four, the strongest construct was two mattress sutures (Mean 169N), followed by single Modified Kessler (Mean 161N), four simple sutures (Mean 155N) and finally a single Mason Allen suture (Mean 140N). Suture configurations involving two passes were all weaker than those with four (one way analysis of variance p=0.026), even when Number 2 Fibertape was used to augment strength.

These results show little difference in strength for varying complexity of four pass suture passage (one way analysis of variance p=0.61). In simple terms there is no demonstrable difference in the strength of construct whether the surgeon uses four simple, two mattress or one grasping suture. This study allows the surgeon to justify using the simplest configuration of suture passage that works in his hands in order to obtain a reliable and repeatable repair of the rotator cuff arthroscopically.

Aim

Review causes of anchor fixation failures in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Aim

Acute postoperative infection is reported to occur in 0.3–2% after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Few reports have addressed this dreaded complication although the costs are high both for the patient and for society. The aim of this prospective study was to describe incidence, treatment and outcome after acute postoperative infections following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Introduction

One of the disadvantages of lateral decubitus position during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is the difficulty to control arm rotation intraoperatively making it necessary to create additional portals for anchor placement or an additional scrubbed assistant to control arm rotation.

Purpose

Controversy exists regarding the optimal technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this multicentre randomized double-blind controlled study was to compare the functional outcomes and healing rates of double-row suture techniques with single row repair.

Our aim was to accurately determine whether muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration are reversible following cuff repair. Patients with a repairable cuff-tear were recruited and assessed clinically and radiologically (Magnetic Resonance Imaging). At surgery, supraspinatus was biopsied. Post-operatively, patients underwent clinical evaluation at standardised intervals, with further MRI and an ultrasound guided biopsy of supraspinatus at 12 months.

MRI was used to characterize cuff-tears and determine the degree of muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration. Biopsy samples were fixed on-site and transported for processing. Morphometric assessments of myofibres were made and mean cross-sectional areas calculated using validated techniques. The pathologist was blinded to sample details. Statistical analysis was performed to assess differences in mean myofibre area following cuff repair and correlated with radiological findings.

Eight patients were available for completed histological and radiological analysis. Six (two re-tears) demonstrated sizeable and highly statistically significant improvements in mean myofibre cross-sectional area (P=0.000–0.0253). Of the two not showing any increase in myofibre area, neither result was statistically significant (P=0.06, 0.2); one was a re-tear and one was a repair of a partial-thickness tear. Radiologically, the muscle and fatty changes had not demonstrably changed.

Our finding that myofibre cross-sectional area increases following cuff repair suggests muscle atrophy is a potentially reversible process. Even with re-tears, improvements were seen. MRI features of fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy were not seen to improve however. It is likely that radiological assessment is not sensitive enough to demonstrate the reversibility of muscle atrophy seen on histological analysis at one year.

Abstract. Background. We know that tears of the Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) can cause DRUJ instability and ulnar sided wrist pain. This study shows the clinical result of patients who had arthroscopic transosseous repair of the TFCC tear with DRUJ instability. Arthroscopic repair of TFCC tear is a promising, minimally invasive surgical technique especially in patients with DRUJ instability. Materials and methods. Fifteen patients who underwent TFCC one tunnel repair form 2018–2021 were reviewed retrospectively in hospital. The proximal component of TFCC was repaired through arthroscopic one- tunnel transosseous suture technique. VAS score for pain, wrist range of motion, grip strength and post operative complications were evaluated and each patient was rated according to the DASH score. Results. The patients had a TFCC tear confirmed on MRI and was confirmed on arthroscopy by doing a hook test. The patients were followed up for 6 months. Twelve patients had normal stability of DRUJ and three patients showed mild laxity compared with the contralateral side. The mean VAS score reduced from 4.7 to 0.8 (P=0.001) and grip strength increased significantly. The quick DASH score (P=0.001)also showed significant functional improvement. No surgical related complications occurred. Conclusions. Arthroscopic one tunnel transosseous TFCC foveal repair can be an excellent and safe method for repair of TFCC tear with DRUJ instability. Its a good treatment option in terms of reliable pain relief, functional improvement and reestablishment of DRUJ stability

Interscalene brachial plexus block is the standard regional analgesic technique for shoulder surgery. Given its adverse effects, alternative techniques have been explored. Reports suggest that the erector spinae plane block may potentially provide effective analgesia following shoulder surgery. However, its analgesic efficacy for shoulder surgery compared with placebo or local anaesthetic infiltration has never been established. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare the analgesic efficacy of pre-operative T2 erector spinae plane block with peri-articular infiltration at the end of surgery. Sixty-two patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder repair were randomly assigned to receive active erector spinae plane block with saline peri-articular injection (n = 31) or active peri-articular injection with saline erector spinae plane block (n = 31) in a blinded double-dummy design. Primary outcome was resting pain score in recovery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores with movement; opioid use; patient satisfaction; adverse effects in hospital; and outcomes at 24 h and 1 month. There was no difference in pain scores in recovery, with a median difference (95%CI) of 0.6 (-1.9-3.1), p = 0.65. Median postoperative oral morphine equivalent utilisation was significantly higher in the erector spinae plane group (21 mg vs. 12 mg; p = 0.028). Itching was observed in 10% of patients who received erector spinae plane block and there was no difference in the incidence of significant nausea and vomiting. Patient satisfaction scores, and pain scores and opioid use at 24 h were similar. At 1 month, six (peri-articular injection) and eight (erector spinae plane block) patients reported persistent pain. Erector spinae plane block was not superior to peri-articular injection for arthroscopic shoulder surgery