The Latarjet procedure is a well described method to stabilize anterior shoulder instability. There are concerns of high complication rates, one of these being a painful shoulder without instability due to screw irritation. The arthroscopic changes in the shoulder at time of screw removal compared to those pre-Latarjet have not been described in the literature. We conducted a retrospective review of arthroscopic videos between 2015 and 2022 of 17 patients at the time of their Latarjet screw removal and where available (n=13) compared them to arthroscopic findings at time of index Latarjet. Instability was an exclusion criterion. X-rays prior to screw removal were assessed independently by two observers blinded to patient details for lysis of the graft. Arthroscopic assessment of the anatomy and pathological changes were made by two shoulder surgeons via mutual consensus. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was analyzed as a measure for the inter-observer reliability for the radiographs. Our cohort had an average age of 21.5±7.7 years and an average period of 16.2±13.1 months between pre- and post-arthroscopy. At screw removal all patients had an inflamed subscapularis muscle with 88% associated musculotendinous tears and 59% had a pathological posterior labrum. Worsening in the condition of subscapularis muscle (93%), humeral (31%) and glenoid (31%) cartilage was found when compared to pre-Latarjet arthroscopes. Three failures of capsular repair were seen, two of these when only one anchor was used. X-ray review demonstrated 79% of patients had graft lysis. Excellent inter-rater reliability was observed with an ICC value of 0.82. Our results show a high rate of pathological change in the subscapularis muscle, glenoid labrum and articular cartilage in the stable but painful Latarjet. 79% of patients had graft lysis with prominent screws on X-ray

Adequate visual clarity is paramount to performing arthroscopic shoulder surgery safely, efficiently, and effectively. The addition of epinephrine in irrigation fluid, and the intravenous or local administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) have independently been reported to decrease bleeding thereby improving the surgeon's visualization during arthroscopic shoulder procedures. No study has compared the effect of systemic administered TXA, epinephrine added in the irrigation fluid or the combination of both TXA and epinephrine on visual clarity during shoulder arthroscopy with a placebo group. The purpose of this study is to determine if intravenous TXA is a safe alternative to epinephrine delivered by a pressure-controlled pump in improving arthroscopic shoulder visualization during arthroscopic procedures and whether using both TXA and epinephrine together has an additive effect in improving visualization. The design of the study was a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with four 1:1:1:1 parallel groups conducted at one center. Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic shoulder procedures including rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic biceps tenotomy/tenodesis, distal clavicle excision, subacromial decompression and labral repair by five fellowship-trained upper extremity surgeons were randomized into one of four arms: Pressure pump-controlled regular saline irrigation fluid (control), epinephrine (1ml of 1:1000) mixed in irrigation fluid (EPI), 1g intravenous TXA (TXA), and epinephrine and TXA (EPI/TXA). Visualization was rated on a 4-point Likert scale every 15 minutes with 0 indicating ‘poor’ quality and 3 indicating ‘excellent’ quality. The primary outcome measure was the unweighted mean of these ratings. Secondary outcomes included mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), surgery duration, surgery complexity, and adverse events within the first postoperative week. One hundred and twenty-eight participants with a mean age (± SD) of 56 (± 11) years were randomized. Mean visualization quality for the control, TXA, EPI, and EPI/TXA groups were 2.1 (±0.40), 2.1 (±0.52), 2.6 (±0.37), 2.6 (±0.35), respectively. In a regression model with visual quality as the dependent variable, the presence/absence of EPI was the most significant predictor of visualization quality (R=0.525; p < 0 .001). TXA presence/absence had no effect, and there was no interaction between TXA and EPI. The addition of MAP and surgery duration strengthened the model (R=0.529; p < 0 .001). Increased MAP and surgery duration were both associated with decreased visualization quality. When surgery duration was controlled, surgery complexity was not a significant predictor of visualization quality. No adverse events were recorded in any of the groups. Intravenous administration of TXA is not an effective alternative to epinephrine in the irrigation fluid to improve visualization during routine arthroscopic shoulder surgeries although its application is safe. There is no additional improvement in visualization when TXA is used in combination with epinephrine beyond the effect of epinephrine alone

Adequate visual clarity is paramount to performing arthroscopic shoulder surgery safely, efficiently, and effectively. The addition of epinephrine in irrigation fluid, and the intravenous or local administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) have independently been reported to decrease bleeding thereby improving the surgeon's visualization during arthroscopic shoulder procedures. No study has compared the effect of systemic administered TXA, epinephrine added in the irrigation fluid or the combination of both TXA and epinephrine on visual clarity during shoulder arthroscopy with a placebo group. The purpose of this study is to determine if intravenous TXA is a safe alternative to epinephrine delivered by a pressure-controlled pump in improving arthroscopic shoulder visualization during arthroscopic procedures and whether using both TXA and epinephrine together has an additive effect in improving visualization. The design of the study was a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with four 1:1:1:1 parallel groups conducted at one center. Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic shoulder procedures including rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic biceps tenotomy/tenodesis, distal clavicle excision, subacromial decompression and labral repair by five fellowship-trained upper extremity surgeons were randomized into one of four arms: Pressure pump-controlled regular saline irrigation fluid (control), epinephrine (1ml of 1:1000) mixed in irrigation fluid (EPI), 1g intravenous TXA (TXA), and epinephrine and TXA (EPI/TXA). Visualization was rated on a 4-point Likert scale every 15 minutes with 0 indicating ‘poor’ quality and 3 indicating ‘excellent’ quality. The primary outcome measure was the unweighted mean of these ratings. Secondary outcomes included mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), surgery duration, surgery complexity, and adverse events within the first postoperative week. One hundred and twenty-eight participants with a mean age (± SD) of 56 (± 11) years were randomized. Mean visualization quality for the control, TXA, EPI, and EPI/TXA groups were 2.1 (±0.40), 2.1 (±0.52), 2.6 (±0.37), 2.6 (±0.35), respectively. In a regression model with visual quality as the dependent variable, the presence/absence of EPI was the most significant predictor of visualization quality (R=0.525; p < 0 .001). TXA presence/absence had no effect, and there was no interaction between TXA and EPI. The addition of MAP and surgery duration strengthened the model (R=0.529; p < 0 .001). Increased MAP and surgery duration were both associated with decreased visualization quality. When surgery duration was controlled, surgery complexity was not a significant predictor of visualization quality. No adverse events were recorded in any of the groups. Intravenous administration of TXA is not an effective alternative to epinephrine in the irrigation fluid to improve visualization during routine arthroscopic shoulder surgeries although its application is safe. There is no additional improvement in visualization when TXA is used in combination with epinephrine beyond the effect of epinephrine alone

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a condition of the hip where there is a mismatch of the femoral head and hip acetabulum. This mismatch creates abnormal contact between the bones and causes hip pain which can lead to damage, and eventually osteoarthritis of the hip. The diagnosis and treatment of FAI has become one of the most popular clinical scenarios in orthopaedic surgery, with hip arthroscopy procedures increasing exponentially over the past five years. Surgical intervention usually involves correcting the existing deformities by reshaping the ball and socket (“osteoplasty” or “rim trimming”) so that they fit together more easily while repairing any other existing soft tissue damage in the hip joint (e.g. labral repair). Although correction of the misshaped bony anatomy and associated intra-articular soft tissue damage of the hip is thought to appease impingement and improve pain and function, the current evidence is based on small, observational, and low quality studies. A lack of definitive evidence regarding the efficacy of osteochondroplasty in treating FAI fueled the design and execution of the FIRST randomized controlled trial (RCT). FIRST evaluated the impact of surgical correction of the hip impingement morphology with arthroscopic osteochondroplasty versus arthroscopic lavage on pain, function, and quality of life in adults aged 18–50 years diagnosed with non-arthritic FAI at one year. FIRST was a large definitive RCT (NCT01623843) enrolling patients with FAI requiring surgical intervention across 11 international clinical sites. Participants were randomized to either arthroscopic osteochondroplasty (shaving of bone) or lavage (washing the joint of painful inflammation debris). The primary outcome was patient-reported pain within one year of the initial surgery measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included function, health utility, and health-related quality of life using several general and hip-centric health questionnaires. An independent, blinded adjudication committee evaluated the quality of surgery, re-operations, and other patient complications. Patients and data analysts were blinded to the treatment groups. Two-hundred and twenty participants were enrolled into the FIRST trial over a six-year period (pilot phase: N=50, from 2012–2013 and definitive phase: N=170, from 2015–2018) at 11 clinical sites in Canada, Finland, and Denmark. The FIRST results will be released at the ISAKOS annual meeting as follows. The absolute difference in rate of pain reduction between groups was XX (95% CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean differences of the Short-Form 12 (SF-12, MCS and PCS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) between groups are XX (95% CI: YY-YY, p=X)…, respectively. Reoperations occurred in XX of 220 (X%) patients over the one-year follow up period (OR:XX, 95% CI: YY-YY, p=X) and the patients treated with arthroscopic osteochondroplasty conferred the following risk of reoperation within one-year compared to arthroscopic lavage (RR:XX, 95% CI: YY-YY, p=X). This RCT represents major international efforts to definitively identify the optimal treatment strategy for FAI. The results of this trial will change practice, being used to prevent chronic hip pain and loss of function caused by hip osteoarthritis

Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioids than any other surgical speciality. Opioids remain the analgesic of choice following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery. There is growing evidence that opioid-sparing protocols may reduce postoperative opioid consumption while adequately addressing patients’ pain. However, there are a lack of prospective, comparative trials evaluating their effectiveness. The objective of the current randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal, opioid-sparing approach to postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgery. The NO PAin trial is a pragmatic, definitive RCT (NCT04566250) enrolling 200 adult patients undergoing outpatient shoulder or knee arthroscopy. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an opioid-sparing group or standard of care. The opioid-sparing group receives a three-pronged prescription package consisting of 1) a non-opioid prescription: naproxen, acetaminophen and pantoprazole, 2) a limited opioid “rescue prescription” of hydromorphone, and 3) a patient education infographic. The control group is the current standard of care as per the treating surgeon, which consists of an opioid analgesic. The primary outcome of interest is oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption up to 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, quantity of OMEs prescribed and number of opioid refills. Patients are followed at both 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Data analysts and outcome assessors are blinded to the treatment groups. As of December 1, 2021 we have enrolled 166 patients, reaching 83% of target enrolment. Based on the current recruitment rate, we anticipate that enrolment will be completed by the end of January 2022 with final follow-up and study close out completed by March of 2022. The final results will be released at the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Meeting in June 2022 and be presented as follows. The mean difference in OME consumption was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in OMEs prescribed was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction are XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The absolute difference in opioid refills was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The results of the current study will demonstrate whether an opioid sparing approach to postoperative outpatient pain management is effective at reducing opioid consumption while adequately addressing postoperative pain in patients undergoing outpatient shoulder and knee arthroscopy. This study is novel in the field of arthroscopic surgery, and its results will help to guide appropriate postoperative analgesic management following these widely performed procedures

Knee joint infection after an ACL reconstruction procedure is infrequently but might be a devastating clinical problem, if not diagnosed promptly and treated wisely. The results of functional outcomes in these patients are not well known because there aren't large patient series in the literature. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and determine the adequate management of septic arthritis following ACL reconstruction and to assess the patient functional outcomes. The authors conducted a retrospective multicentric analysis of septic arthritis cases occurring after arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstructions (hamstrings and BTB), in patients submitted to surgery between 2010 to 2014. The study reviewed patients submitted do ACL reconstruction, that presented objective clinical suspicion of joint infection, in post-operative acute and sub-acute phases, associated with high inflammatory seric parameters (CRP >=10,0, ESR>=30,0) and synovial effusion laboratory parameters highly suggestive (PMN >=80, leucocytes >=3000). All this patients were treated with antibiotic empiric suppressive therapy and then directed antibiotherapy according to antibiotic sensitivity profile, then the patients were submitted to arthroscopic lavage procedure, without arthropump, but with debris and fibrotic tissue removal preserving always the ACL plasty. The functional outcomes analyzed were the Lysholm and the IKDC score. Eleven (2.2 %) out of 490 patients analyzed in the sudy were diagnosed with a post-operative septic arthritis. The microbiologic exams showed coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was present in 5 patients (S. lugdunensis in 4 cases and S. capitis in 1 case), Staphylococcus Aureus in 2 patients (1 MSSA and 1 MRSA). In four patients, the micro-organism was not identified. The studied patients had a mean follow-up of 28 ± 16 months, the Lysholm score was 74.8 ± 12.2, the IKDC score was 66.4 ± 20.5. Functional outcomes in the control group were better than those obtained in the infected group. (Lysholm score 88.2 ± 9.4 (NS); IKDC score 86.6 ± 6.8 (NS). All patients retained their reconstructed ACL. None of the patients relapsed or need other intervention because of ACL failure and chronic instability. The prevalence of septic arthritis after an ACL reconstruction in this series was 2.2 %, slightly higher than other international series (0.14 to 1.7 %). Arthroscopic lavages along with antibiotic treatment showed to be a secure procedure and allowed the preservation of the ACL plasties, without infection relapse. But the functional outcomes after active intra-articular infection were largely inferior to those obtained in patients without infection, probably to uncontrolled and intense inflammatory local response

Abstract. Objectives. The study aims to determine whether an arthroscopic ligament reconstruction is necessary to relieve clinical ankle instability symptoms in patients with an MRI scan showing medial or lateral ligament tear. Methods. This was a single centre retrospective case series study of 25 patients with ankle instability and ligament tear on MRI scan who had undergone arthroscopic procedures from January 2015 to December 2018. Patients were followed up for an average period of 3 years postoperatively to check for any recurrence of symptoms. Results. Of the 25 patients, 23 had ATFL tear on MRI scan, and 2 had deltoid ligament tear. Examination under anaesthesia was stable in 13 patients and unstable in 12 patients. The majority of the patients (76%) had a simple arthroscopic ankle debridement and no ligament repair. Six patients needed Brostrom repair. Conclusions. Our study has shown that in patients with MRI proven ligament tear and clinical instability, a ligament reconstruction was unnecessary in most patients. The instability symptoms of patients were relieved by simple ankle arthroscopic debridement

Abstract. Background. We know that tears of the Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) can cause DRUJ instability and ulnar sided wrist pain. This study shows the clinical result of patients who had arthroscopic transosseous repair of the TFCC tear with DRUJ instability. Arthroscopic repair of TFCC tear is a promising, minimally invasive surgical technique especially in patients with DRUJ instability. Materials and methods. Fifteen patients who underwent TFCC one tunnel repair form 2018–2021 were reviewed retrospectively in hospital. The proximal component of TFCC was repaired through arthroscopic one- tunnel transosseous suture technique. VAS score for pain, wrist range of motion, grip strength and post operative complications were evaluated and each patient was rated according to the DASH score. Results. The patients had a TFCC tear confirmed on MRI and was confirmed on arthroscopy by doing a hook test. The patients were followed up for 6 months. Twelve patients had normal stability of DRUJ and three patients showed mild laxity compared with the contralateral side. The mean VAS score reduced from 4.7 to 0.8 (P=0.001) and grip strength increased significantly. The quick DASH score (P=0.001)also showed significant functional improvement. No surgical related complications occurred. Conclusions. Arthroscopic one tunnel transosseous TFCC foveal repair can be an excellent and safe method for repair of TFCC tear with DRUJ instability. Its a good treatment option in terms of reliable pain relief, functional improvement and reestablishment of DRUJ stability

Arthroscopic hip surgery is increasingly common in Australia. Hip arthroscopy is indicated for a range of diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including labral tears, capsular laxity and femoral-acetabular impingement (FAI). Despite this, previous cohort studies aiming to characterise hip pathology seen on arthroscopic examination are mostly limited to patients with known diagnoses of FAI. Therefore, little is known of the native articular wear patterns encountered in other disease states. Therefore, we aimed to define common osteochondral wear patterns for a cohort of patients managed via hip arthroscopy. We retrospectively analysed intraoperative data for 1127 patients managed via hip arthroscopy between 2008 and 2013, for either therapeutic or diagnostic purposes. Intraoperative data was categorized by location (A-E as defined by Fontana et al. 2016) and chondral damage (0-4 scale as defined by Beck et al. 2005) with respect to both acetabulum and femoral head. Data for 1127 patients were included. Location of acetabular chondral pathology was variable with locations C. 1. and D. 1. representing the most common regions of damage. Labral tears predominated in locations C and D. Femoral chondral pathology was evenly distributed. The degree of femoral chondral injury was predominantly grade 1, whilst acetabular wear was evenly distributed. Large proportions of wear were observed at the peripheral superior and anterior regions of the lunate surface of the acetabulum in keeping with prior works. However, we observed higher rates of central wear and lower rates of grade 4 acetabular damage extending into superior/posterior zones, in our cohort. Our work characterises common articular wear patterns encountered at the time of hip arthroscopy. Further inquiry into the natural history of osteochondral lesions is needed to better understand and manage these conditions

Abstract. Aim. The aim of this study was to present the results of treatment of displaced lateral clavicle fractures by an arthroscopically inserted tightrope device (‘Dogbone’, Arthrex). Methods. We performed a retrospective series of our patients treated with this technique between 2015 and 2019. Patients were identified using the ‘CRS Millennium’ software package and operation notes/clinic letters were analysed. We performed an Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) on all the patients at final follow-up. Our electronic ‘PACS’ system was used to evaluate union in the post-operative radiographs. Results. We treated 26 patients with displaced lateral clavicle fractures between 2015 and 2019. There were 4 patients who were treated with a ‘dogbone’ and supplementary plate fixation and the remaining 22 were treated with a ‘dogbone’ alone. Radiological union was seen in 22 (84%) patients. The mean Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) was 46. Apart from one patient who required removal of the superior endobutton and knot under local anaesthetic there was no other secondary surgery. There were no cases of infection, nerve injury or frozen shoulder. Conclusions. Arthroscopic ‘dogbone’ treatment of lateral clavicle fractures is a safe, cosmetically friendly technique with promising high rates of fracture union and return to normal function. We recommend its use over the more conventional treatment of a hook plate

Interscalene brachial plexus block is the standard regional analgesic technique for shoulder surgery. Given its adverse effects, alternative techniques have been explored. Reports suggest that the erector spinae plane block may potentially provide effective analgesia following shoulder surgery. However, its analgesic efficacy for shoulder surgery compared with placebo or local anaesthetic infiltration has never been established. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare the analgesic efficacy of pre-operative T2 erector spinae plane block with peri-articular infiltration at the end of surgery. Sixty-two patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder repair were randomly assigned to receive active erector spinae plane block with saline peri-articular injection (n = 31) or active peri-articular injection with saline erector spinae plane block (n = 31) in a blinded double-dummy design. Primary outcome was resting pain score in recovery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores with movement; opioid use; patient satisfaction; adverse effects in hospital; and outcomes at 24 h and 1 month. There was no difference in pain scores in recovery, with a median difference (95%CI) of 0.6 (-1.9-3.1), p = 0.65. Median postoperative oral morphine equivalent utilisation was significantly higher in the erector spinae plane group (21 mg vs. 12 mg; p = 0.028). Itching was observed in 10% of patients who received erector spinae plane block and there was no difference in the incidence of significant nausea and vomiting. Patient satisfaction scores, and pain scores and opioid use at 24 h were similar. At 1 month, six (peri-articular injection) and eight (erector spinae plane block) patients reported persistent pain. Erector spinae plane block was not superior to peri-articular injection for arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Recurrent anterior shoulder instability (RASI) is related to progressive bone loss on the glenoid and on the humeral head. Bone deficit magnitude is a well-recognized predictor of recurrence of instability after an arthroscopic Bankart surgery, but the best way to measure it is unknown. In this study, we want to determine which measurement method is the best predictor of recurrence of instability and function. For 10 years now, all patients undergoing surgery for RASI in 4 centers are included in a prospective study: the LUXE cohort. Patients with a pre-operative CT-scan and a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. ISIS score was used to stratify patients. WOSI and Quick-Dash questionnaires were used to characterise function. Bone defects were assessed using the Clock method, the Glenoid Ratio, the Humeral Ratio, the Glenoid Track method and the angle of engagement in the axial plane. A total of 262 patients are now included in the LUXE study. One hundred and three patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis with a majority of male (79%) and a mean age is 28 years old. The median number of dislocations prior to surgery was 6. Seventy patients had an arthroscopic Bankart repair and 33 patients underwent an open Latarjet procedure. The ISIS score for these groups were of 2.7 and 4.8 respectively (p<0.001). The mean bone defect on the glenoid was of 1h51 with the Clock method (range: 0h-4h48; SD=1h46) and of 9% for the glenoid ratio (0–37%, 10%). On the humeral side, the bone defect was of 1h59 (0h-4h08; 0h49) for the Humeral clock method, 15% (0–36%; 6%) with the ratio method and 71 degrees of external rotation (SD=30 degrees) with the angle of engagement measurement. On the combined evaluations, 53 patients presented an off-track lesion, with mean combined hours of 3h53 (SD= 2h13). The greatest correlation obtained was between the glenoid ratio and the glenoid clock method (r=0.919, p<0.001). Eighteen patients had a recurrence of shoulder dislocation after the initial surgery, leading to a recurrence rate of 23% in arthroscopic surgery versus six percent after a Latarjet (OR= 4.6, p=0.034). No bone defect was correlated to Latarjet failure. For the arthroscopic group, the risk of recurrence was related to a smaller angle of engagement of the Hill-Sachs (p=0.05), a smaller Humeral clock measurement (p=0.034) and a longer follow-up (p=0.006). No glenoid or combined measurements were correlated with arthroscopic procedure failure. Recurrence of dislocation was associated to worst function according to the WOSI (1036 vs 573, p=0.002) and DASH (32 vs 15, p=0.03). Even with lower ISIS score, arthroscopic procedures are still leading to high risk of recurrence in this “all comer” consecutive cohort study AND it is related to humeral side parameters. Recurrence is also affecting daily function and creating higher anxiety related to the shoulder

Aims. We studied the outcomes following arthroscopic primary repair of bucket handle meniscus tears to determine the incidence of re-tears and the functional outcomes of these patients. Methodology. Prospective cohort study. Over a 4-year period (2016 to 2020), 35 adult patients presented with a bucket handle tear of the meniscus. Arthroscopic meniscal repair was performed using either the all inside technique or a combination of all-inside and inside-out techniques. 15 patients also underwent simultaneous arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Functional knee scores were assessed using IKDC and Lysholm scores. Results. Mean patient age at surgery was 27 years (range, 17 to 53years). Medial meniscus was torn in 20 and lateral in 15 cases. Zone of tear was white on white in 19, red on white in 9 and red on red in 7 cases. Average delay from injury to surgery was 4 months. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, the meniscus repair failed in 3 patients (8.5 %). Outcome following re-tear was meniscus excision. Average IKDC scores in patients with intact repair were 74.04 against 56.67 in patients with a failed repair (p< 0.0001). Similarly, Lyshlom scores were 88.96 and 67.333, respectively (p<0.0001). Conclusion. The survivorship of primary repair of bucket handle meniscus tears in our series was 91.5% at medium term follow-up. Functional outcomes were significantly poor in patients with a failed repair compared to those with an intact repair

Previously, we conducted a multi-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without remplissage. The end point for the randomized controlled trial was two years post-operative, providing support for the benefits of remplissage in the short term in reducing recurrent instability. The aim of this study was to compare the medium term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of patients previously randomized to have undergone isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) for the management of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. The rate of recurrent instability and instances of re-operation were examined. The original study was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial with two 1:1 parallel groups with recruitment undertaken between 2011 and 2017. For this medium-term study, participants were reached for a telephone follow-up in 2020 and asked a series of standardized questions regarding ensuing instances of subluxation, dislocation or reoperation that had occurred on their shoulder for which they were randomized. Descriptive statistics were generated for all variables. “Failure” was defined as occurrence of a dislocation. “Recurrent instability” was defined as the participant reporting a dislocation or two or more occurences of subluxation greater than one year post-operative. All analyses were undertaken based on intention-to-treat whereby their data was analyzed based on the group to which they were originally allocated. One-hundred and eight participants were randomized of which 50 in the NO REMP group and 52 in the REMP group were included in the analyses in the original study. The mean number of months from surgery to final follow-up was 49.3 for the NO REMP group and 53.8 for the REMP group. The rates of re-dislocation or failure were 8% (4/52) in the REMP group at an average of 23.8 months post-operative versus 22% (11/50) in the NO REMP at an average of 16.5 months post-operative. The rates of recurrent instability were 10% (5/52) in the REMP group at an average of 24 months post-operative versus 30% (15/50) in the NO REMP group at an average of 19.5 months post-operative. Survival curves were significantly different favouring REMP in both scenarios. Arthroscopic Bankart repair combined with remplissage is an effective procedure in the treatment of patients with an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion and minimal glenoid bone loss (<15%). Patients can expect favourable rates of recurrent instability when compared with isolated Bankart repair at medium term follw-up

Since its creation, labral repair has become the preferred method among surgeons for the arthroscopic treatment of acetabular labral tears resulting in pain and dysfunction for patients. Labral reconstruction is performed mainly in revision hip arthroscopy but can be used in the primary setting when the labrum cannot be repaired or is calcified. The purpose of this study was to compare the survival between primary labral repair and labral reconstruction with survival defined as no further surgery (revision or total hip replacement). Patients who underwent labral repair or reconstruction between January 2005 and December 2018 in the primary setting were included in the study. Patients were included if they had primary hip arthroscopy with the senior author for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), involving either labral reconstruction or labral repair, and were within the ages of 18 and 65 at the time of surgery. Exclusion criteria included confounding injuries (Leggs Calves Perthes, avascular necrosis, femoral head fracture, etc.), history of unilateral or bilateral hip surgeries, or Tönnis grades of 2 or 3 at the time of surgery. Labral repairs were performed when adequate tissue was available for repair and labral reconstruction was performed when tissue was absent, ossified or torn beyond repair. A total of 501 labral repairs and 114 labral reconstructions performed in the primary setting were included in the study. Labral reconstruction patients were older (37±10) compared to labral repair (34±11).(p=0.021). Second surgeries were required in 19/114 (17%) of labral reconstruction and 40/501(8%) [odds ratio: 2.3; 95% CI 1.3 to 4.2] (p=0.008). Revision hip arthroscopy were required in 6/114(5%) labral reconstructions and 33/501(6.5%) labral repair (p=0.496). Total hip replacement was required in 13/114 labral reconstructions and 7/501 labral repairs [odds ratio:9.1 95%CI 3.5 to 23] (p=< 0.01). The mean survival for the labral repair group was 10.2 years (95%CI:10 to 10.5) and 11.9 years (98%CI:10.9 to 12.8) in the labral reconstruction group. Conversion to total hip was required more often following primary labral reconstruction. Revision hip arthroscopy rates were similar between groups as was the mean survival, with both over 10 years. Similar survival was seen in labral repair and reconstruction when strict patient selection criteria are followed

Malnutrition is an important consideration during the perioperative period and albumin is the most common laboratory surrogate for nutritional status. The purpose of this study is to identify if preoperative serum albumin measurements are predictive of infection following arthroscopic procedures. Patients undergoing knee, shoulder or hip arthroscopy between 2006–2016 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients with an arthroscopic current procedural terminology code and a preoperative serum albumin measurement were included. Patients with a history of prior infection, including a non-clean wound class, pre-existing wound infection or systemic sepsis were excluded. Independent t-tests where used to compare albumin values in patients with and without the occurrence of a postoperative infection. Pre-operative albumin levels were subsequently evaluated as predictors of infection with logistic regression models. There were 31,906 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 55.7 years (standard deviation (SD) 14.62) and average BMI was 31.7 (SD 7.21). The most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (49.2%), diabetes (18.4%) and smoking history (16.9%). The average preoperative albumin was 4.18 (SD 0.42). There were 45 cases of superficial infection (0.14%), 10 cases of wound dehiscence (0.03%), 17 cases of deep infection (0.05%), 27 cases of septic arthritis or other organ space infection (0.08%) and 95 cases of any infection (0.30%). The preoperative albumin levels for patients who developed septic arthritis (mean difference (MD) 0.20, 95% CI, 0.038, 0.35, P = 0.015) or any infection (MD 0.14, 95% CI 0.05, 0.22, P = 0.002) were significantly lower than the normal population. Additionally, disseminated cancer, Hispanic race, inpatient status and smoking history were significant independent risk factors for infection, while female sex and increasing albumin were protective towards developing any infection. Rates of all infections were found to increase exponentially with decreasing albumin. The relative risk of infection with an albumin of 2 was 3.46 (95% CI, 2.74–4.38) when compared to a normal albumin of 4. For each albumin increase of 0.69, the odds of developing any infection decreases by a factor of 0.52. This study suggests that preoperative serum albumin is an independent predictor of septic arthritis and all infection following elective arthroscopic procedures. Although the effect of albumin on infection is modest, malnutrition may represent a modifiable risk factor with regard to preventing infection following arthroscopy

Infection is a potentially disastrous complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although advances in surgical technique and antibiotic prophylaxis have reduced the incidence of infection to approximately 1% in primary TKA, there is still a substantial number of patients. Treatment options include antibiotic suppression, irrigation and debridement with component retention (with or without polyethylene exchange), one-stage or two-stage revision, resection arthroplasty and rarely arthrodesis or amputation. Salvage of prostheses has always been associated with low rates of success. It was reported a success rate of 27% for open debridement. It is suitable for selective cases where infection occurs within the first 4–6 weeks of primary TKA or in the setting of acute hematogenous gram positive infection with stable implants. With the advances in arthroscopic technique, arthroscopy after TKA has become an accepted method to assess and manage the complications of TKA. Arthroscopic treatment for infected TKA was reported and the successful rate was similar or better than open debridement in selected situations. We used arthroscopic debridement combined with continuous antibiotic irrigation and suction to treat acute presentation of infected TKA with acceptable result. From 2010∼2013, we has performed arthroscopic debridement and continuous antibiotic irrigation system for seven patients with infected TKA. All of the seven patients had no open wounds nor sinuses and no radiological evidence of prosthetic instability or evidence of osteomyelitis. Most of the surgical intervention was performed within two weeks from the onset of symptoms. Arthroscopic debridement was performed with a shaver using a multiportal technique (anterolateral, anteromedial, superolateral, superomedial, posterolateral, posteromedial) and a continuous antibiotic irrigation system was used to dilutes concentration of the causative microorganism and keep high local bactericidal concentration of antibiotics. We evaluated the efficacy by using follow up of the C-reactve protein (CRP) test, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) test and physical examination. Successful treatment was defined as prosthesis retention without recurrent infection by the final follow-up. Six of seven infected TKA were cured without recurrence at a mean follow-up of 23 months (range, 6–41 months). One case with rheumatoid arthritis under long-term steroid therapy had recurred after episode of upper respiratory tract infection for 3 times. However, the infection was controlled by arthroscopic debridement and retention of the prosthesis was achieved. We emphasize the importance of posterior portal to ensure adequate arthroscopic debridement. It is imperative to make early diagnosis and treatment for infected TKA. We should make more effort to preserve the prosthesis in acute infection(within 2 weeks). With the advantage of minimal morbidity, arthroscopic treatement shoulder be an alternative to open debridement

Rotator cuff repair (RCR) can be performed open or arthroscopically, with a recent dramatic increase in the latter. Despite controversy about the preferred technique, there has been an increase in the number of repairs performed arthroscopically. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to compare revision rates following open and arthroscopic RCR repair. Adult patients undergoing first-time, primary rotator cuff repair in Ontario, Canada (April 2003-March 2014) were identified using physician billing and hospital databases. Patients were followed for a minimum of two and up to 13 years for the primary outcome, revision rotator cuff repair, and secondary outcome, surgical site infection. The intervention considered was open versus arthroscopic technique. Patient factors (age, gender, residence, socioeconomic status, medical comorbidities) and provider factors (surgical volume, hospital setting, worked night before, year of surgery) were recorded. Standardized mean differences were used for covariate comparison. A Cox Proportional Hazards model was used to compare RCR survivorship between the two groups after adjustment for patient and provider factors, generating hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (HR, 95% CIs). Censoring occurred on the first of the primary outcome, death, shoulder arthroplasty or arthrodesis, or the end of the follow-up period (March 2016). A total of 37,255 patients were included. The overall revision RCR rate was 2.9% (1,096 patients) with a median time to revision of 23 months (IQR 12–52). Revision repair was more common in the arthroscopic group in comparison to the open group (3.2% vs 2.6%, NNT 166.7, p=0.004), with an adjusted HR of 0.72 (0.63–0.83 95% CI, p < 0 .0001). The surgical site infection rate was significantly higher in the open group compared with the arthroscopic group (0.5% vs 0.2%, NNT 333.3, p < 0 .001). Patient and provider covariates had no statistically significant effect on revision rates, aside from increasing age (per 10 year increase, HR 0.85, 0.81–0.90 95% CI, p < 0 .0001). Revision rotator cuff repair is approximately 30% more common in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair, in comparison to open repair, after adjustment. Surgical site infection is uncommon regardless of surgical technique, however, it is slightly more common following open repair. In the setting of an economic healthcare crisis, trends of increasing arthroscopic RCR may demand scrutiny, as the technique is associated with higher revision rates and higher costs

Tears of the rotator cuff tendons are a very common entity. Despite recent advances in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, the re-tear rate remains high. Thus, new methods to improve healing rates following rotator cuff repair must be sought. The purpose of this prospective randomized double-blind controlled study is to compare the functional outcomes and healing rates of an adjuvant pre-operative bone microfracture technique prior to arthroscopic cuff repair. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to receive either a percutaneous bone microfracture of the supraspinatus footprint or a “soft tissue needling” technique, in which the pin was passed through the peripheral edges of the rotator cuff, five-seven days prior to index surgery, under ultrasound guidance. Follow-ups were completed at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. Healing status was determined by ultrasound at 6 and 24 months. The primary objective was to compare the WORC score at 24 months. Secondary objectives included the healing status via ultrasound, the Constant, and the ASES scores. A sample size calculation determined that 90 patients provided 80% power to detect a statistical difference between groups. Baseline demographic data did not differ between groups. No statistical differences were detected in the WORC outcome at any time points (p=0.47, baseline, p=0.60, 3 months, p=0.79, 6 months, p=0.50, 12 months, p=0.54, 24 months). Healing rates did not differ between groups (P=0.34) and no differences were observed in the ASES or Constant Scores at all time-points. Statistically significant improvements occurred in both groups from baseline to all time points in all clinical outcome scores (p < 0 .0001). No statistically significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes were identified between pre-operative bone microfracture and soft tissue needling techniques prior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. This study does not support pre-operative microfracture as a adjuvant technique prior to arthroscopic cuff repair

Radial head fractures with fragment displacement should be reduced and fixed, when classified as Mason II type injuries. We describe a method of arthroscopic fixation which is performed as a day case trauma surgery, and compare the results with a more traditional fixation approach, in a case controlled manner. We prospectively reviewed six Mason II radial head fractures which were treated using an arthroscopic reduction and fixation technique. The technique allows the fracture to be mobilised, reduced, and anatomically fixed using headless screws. All arthroscopic surgeries were conducted as day-cases. We retrospectively collected age and sex matched cases of open reduction and fixation of Mason II fractures using headless screws. The arthroscopic cases required less analgesia, shorter hospital admissions, and had fewer complications. The averaged final range of follow-up, at 1 year post-operation was 15 to 140 degrees in the arthroscopic group and 35 to 120 degrees in the open group. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 95/100 and 90/100 respectively. No acute complications were noted in the arthroscopic group, and a radial nerve neuropraxia [n=1], superficial wound infection [n=1], and loose screw [n=1]. Two patients of the arthroscopic group required secondary motion gaining operations [n=1 arthroscopic anterior capsulectomy for a fixed flexion contracture of 35 degrees, and n=1 loss of supination requiring and arthroscopic radial scar excision]. Three patients in the open group required secondary surgery [n=2 arthroscopic anterior capsulectomy for fixed flexion deformities, and n=1 arthroscopic anterior capsulectomy for fixed flexion deformities, and n=1 arthroscopic radial head excision for prominent screws, loss of forearm rotation, and radiocapitellar arthrosis pain]. The technique of arthroscopic fixation of Mason II radial head fractures appears to be valid, with respect to anatomical restoration of the fracture, minimal hospital admission, reduction in analgesia requirement, fewer complications, and a decreased need for secondary surgery