Joint aspiration is a useful tool during preoperative workup in suspected periprosthetic infection. The aim of this study was to review efficacy of joint aspiration in our unit and compare results with the published literature. We undertook a retrospective review of 153 consecutive patients who underwent joint aspirations for suspected periprosthetic infection between 03/2011 and 10/2012 who were identified from the hospital electronic database. As per protocol, joint fluid was sent in an EDTA tube for cell count, Paediatric blood culture bottle and the remainder in a specimen pot. 105 (69%) were TKRs and 48 (31%) were THRs. Intraoperative samples were sent as per protocol in only 40 (26%) cases. The hit rate of positive cultures was 11/153 (7%) and specimens sent in paediatric culture bottles identified more positives than if it was omitted (10.5 Vs 5.5%). In conclusion, the hit rate of positive cultures is low in this study compared to the literature (7% Vs 33%) and this is likely due to blanket aspiration of all patients who are undergoing revision. In addition, specimens sent in paediatric culture bottles seem to identify more positives. We recommend cases are selected for aspiration according to AAOS guidelines.
We compared the use of broth culture medium for
samples taken in theatre with the standard practice of placing tissue
samples in universal containers. A total of 67 consecutive patients
had standard multiple samples of deep tissue harvested at surgery
and distributed equally in theatre either to standard universal
containers or to broth culture medium. These samples were cultured
by direct and enrichment methods. The addition of broth in theatre to
standard practice led to an increase in sensitivity from 83% to
95% and an increase in negative predictive value from 77% to 91%.
Placing tissue samples directly into broth in the operating theatre
is a simple, inexpensive way to increase the sensitivity of cultures
from infected patients, and does not appear to compromise the specificity
of these cultures. Cite this article:
Aim. Propionibacterium acnes is an emerging pathogen especially in orthopedic implant infection. Interestingly, we previously reported a difference in the distribution of the clades involved in spine versus hip or knee prosthetic infection. To date, no study has previously explored the direct impact and close relationship of P. acnes on bone cells according to their own genetic background. The aim of this study was to investigate this interaction of P. acnes clinical strains involved in spine material
Infection is a complication in hip arthroplasty. It increases mortality and morbidity and is a cause for patient's dissatisfaction. Previous Works report an infection rate between 0,4% e 1,5% in primary hip replacement and between 3,2% in revision hip replacement. The aim of this work was to access the infection rates in one hospital, compare them with the reported rates and investigate possible risk factors for infection. Electronic clinical records were consulted. Patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (primary or revision) or hemiarthroplasty in one hospital, between the 1st February 2011 and 31st February 2013, were included. Two hundred and sixty one patients (267 surgeries) were included. Demographically, 57,5% were female patients and 42,5% were male patients with an average age of 77,1 years (± 12,3 years). Infection rate for hemiarthroplasty 3,1%, for primary total hip arthroplasty was 1,4% and for revision procedures 4,8%. A statistically significant relation was found between
In bone and joint infections, several materials can be used for local antibiotic elution at site of infection. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement is often used. Recently the use of antibiotic impregnated dissolvable synthetic pure calcium sulphate beads [Stimulan R]1 has been used as an alternative, due to several perceived advantages. We present our experience of using Calcium sulphate beads in infections involving the upper limb. From Jan 2012 to Jan 2015, we used Calcium sulphate beads in 7 complex upper limb infections including 1 elbow replacement, 2 infected non unions, 2 shoulder replacement, 1 wrist fusion and I ORIF elbow. We used combination of Vancomycin and Gentamicin in the beads, using manufacturer's mixing guide for optimum setting.
Bone and joint infections of the lower limbs cause significant morbidity for patients. Infection is a devastating complication for prosthetic joint replacements. In this large case series from a single centre in the NE of England, we present our experience of using antibiotic impregnated dissolvable synthetic pure calcium sulphate beads [Stimulan R]1 for local elution of antibiotics at the site of infection. At our centre, from August 2012 to Jan 2015, antibiotic impregnated dissolvable synthetic pure calcium sulphate beads [Stimulan R]1 was used for local elution of antibiotics in 45 patients with lower limb bone or joint infections. Tailored plans were made by Orthopedic surgeon and Microbiologist MDTs based on bacteria and sensitivities. Cases included 20 THR, 13 TKR, 5 Hemiarthroplasties, 4 tibial nonunions, 1 infected femoral plate and 2 paediatric osteomyelitis. Organisms isolated – Coagulase negative Staphs, Staph aureus, MRSA, E coli, Enterococcus, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia and 1 Salmonella typhimurium!!. In our cases, a combination of Vancomycin and Gentamicin was added to Stimulan beads following manufacturer's mixing guide. In 2 cases, we added Ceftazidime to the beads and Daptomycin in 1 case. In bone infections, surgical debridement and systemic antibiotics were also needed. All
Propionibacterium acnes is an emerging pathogen especially in orthopedic implant infection. Aim of this study was to investigate P. acnes phylogeny and to screen for virulence factors among a large collection of clinical isolates involved in spine material
Objective. Bacterial infection is a serious complication after joint replacement surgery. In particular, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and epidermidis(MRSE) are very difficult to eradicate in infected prosthetic joint. Therefore, the retention rate of initial prosthesis affected with such resistant microorganisms is still low. Gentian violet shows potent antibacterial activity against gram-positive cocci as minimal bactericidal concentration is less than 0.1 %. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of treatment with gentian violet against MRSA and MRSE infections after THA, TKA, and bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty (BHP). Methods. There were 8 patients in this study; five patients with deep periprosthetic MRSA infection (2 THA, 2 BHP, 1 revision TKA); 3 patients with MRSE infection (1 revision THA, 1 BHP, 1 TKA). When infection was suspected after the surgery, we quickly obtained synovial fluid and periprosthetic soft tissue from the joint and applied to culture and microscopic examinations for detection of microorganisms. After identification of bacterial species, we immediately debrided the affected joint and washed thoroughly twice with 0.1% solution of gentian violet for 3 minutes each, followed by intra-articular multiple injection of arbekacin sulfate solution. Then we inserted an aspiration tube into the joint and administered appropriate antibiotics intravenously. If the inflammatory symptoms persisted in spite of the first treatment, we repeated the treatment until inflammation signs and intra-articular microorganisms could not be detected. Results. At first we examined the bactericidal activity of gentian violet solution against MRSA and MRSE by culture examination with or without the solution. We confirmed gram-negative bacillicould be alive but the both MRSA and MRSE could not be alive by the treatment with 0.01 % solution of gentian violet for 3 minutes. The treatment with gentian violet allowed subsidence of the infection in all patients. Furthermore, we could preserve 4 prostheses with MRSA infection; 1 THA, 1 revision TKA and 2 BHPs; 2 prostheses with MRSE infection; 1 TKA, 1BHP. However, we could not preserve 2 prostheses, 1 THA with MRSA infection and 1 revision THA with MRSE infection. Thus, the prosthetic retention rate of this study for MRSA and MRSE infections was 75 %. We performed two-stage operation for the 2 patients in whom we could not preserve the prostheses as follows: after excision of the infected total hips followed by successful reimplantation. Moreover, all of the patients in this study are able to keep the walking ability after
We conducted a randomised, controlled trial to determine whether changing gloves at specified intervals can reduce the incidence of glove perforation and contamination in total hip arthroplasty. A total of 50 patients were included in the study. In the study group (25 patients), gloves were changed at 20-minute intervals or prior to cementation. In the control group (25 patients), gloves were changed prior to cementation. In addition, gloves were changed in both groups whenever there was a visible puncture. Only outer gloves were investigated. Contamination was tested by impression of gloved fingers on blood agar and culture plates were subsequently incubated at 37°C for 48 hours. The number of colonies and types of organisms were recorded. Glove perforation was assessed using the water test. The incidence of perforation and contamination was significantly lower in the study group compared with the control group. Changing gloves at regular intervals is an effective way to decrease the incidence of glove perforation and bacterial contamination during total hip arthroplasty.