Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 1 | Pages 109 - 114
1 Jan 2015
Haller JM Holt DC McFadden ML Higgins TF Kubiak EN

The aim of this study was to report the incidence of arthrofibrosis of the knee and identify risk factors for its development following a fracture of the tibial plateau. We carried out a retrospective review of 186 patients (114 male, 72 female) with a fracture of the tibial plateau who underwent open reduction and internal fixation. Their mean age was 46.4 years (19 to 83) and the mean follow-up was16.0 months (6 to 80).

A total of 27 patients (14.5%) developed arthrofibrosis requiring a further intervention. Using multivariate regression analysis, the use of a provisional external fixator (odds ratio (OR) 4.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26 to 17.7, p = 0.021) was significantly associated with the development of arthrofibrosis. Similarly, the use of a continuous passive movement (CPM) machine was associated with significantly less development of arthrofibrosis (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.83, p = 0.024). The effect of time in an external fixator was found to be significant, with each extra day of external fixation increasing the odds of requiring manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) or quadricepsplasty by 10% (OR = 1.10, p = 0.030). High-energy fracture, surgical approach, infection and use of tobacco were not associated with the development of arthrofibrosis. Patients with a successful MUA had significantly less time to MUA (mean 2.9 months; sd 1.25) than those with an unsuccessful MUA (mean 4.86 months; sd 2.61, p = 0.014). For those with limited movement, therefore, performing an MUA within three months of the injury may result in a better range of movement.

Based our results, CPM following operative fixation for a fracture of the tibial plateau may reduce the risk of the development of arthrofibrosis, particularly in patients who also undergo prolonged provisional external fixation.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:109–14.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 459 - 459
1 Sep 2012
Aydogdu S Yagci T Sezak M Sur H
Full Access

We aimed to investigate the effect of Seprafilm®, a synthetic biomembran, on the intra-articular adhesion formation in an experimental arthrofibrosis model.

Twenty male white rabbits were randomly allocated into two groups of 10 animals in each. A standard surgical procedure aiming at the development of arthrofibrosis and including medial parapatellar arthrotomy, lateral eversion of the patella, partial synovectomy and debridement of anterior of supracondylar area and patella joint surface by scalpel was performed on all rabbits' right knees. Group 1 rabbits served as controls, and in Group 2 rabbits a Seprafilm®, barrier placed into the described area. In both groups, after surgery, knee joint was immobilized by a no.5 wire suture passing from the ankle and groin and keeping the joint in 140° of flexion. At 6th week, all animals were sacrificed and adhesion formation was evaluated both macroscopically and histo-pathologically. All data were semi-quantified and analyzed statistically by Fisher's exact test.

While all rabbits in control group displayed different rates of adhesion macroscopically (62.5% severe, 25% moderate, 12.5% mild), none in the study group had it. The average macroscopic adhesion score was 2.5 ± 0.75 in control group, and 0 in Seprafilm® group. Histopathologic evaluation also revealed microscopic adhesion in all rabbits in control group, but none in Seprafilm® group. Fibroblast proliferation in Seprafilm® group (100% mild) was significantly lower than in control group (62.5% severe, 37.5% moderate) (p<0.05).

In conclusion, use of Seprafilm® as a mechanical barrier may be of value against the formation of arthrofibrosis in risky knees such as septic and traumatic ones.