Aims. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the type of cervical disc herniation influences the severity of symptoms at the time of presentation, and the outcome after surgical treatment. Methods. The type and extent of disc herniation at the time of presentation in 108 patients who underwent anterior discectomy for cervical radiculopathy were analyzed on MRI, using a four-point scale. These were dichotomized into disc bulge and disc herniation groups. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain in the neck and arm at baseline and two years postoperatively. The perceived recovery was also assessed at this time. Results. At baseline, 46 patients had a disc bulge and 62 had a herniation. There was no significant difference in the mean NDI and SF-36 between the two groups at baseline. Those in the disc bulge group had a mean NDI of 44.6 (SD 15.2) compared with 43.8 (SD 16.0) in the herniation group (p = 0.799), and a mean SF-36 of 59.2 (SD 6.9) compared with 59.4 (SD 7.7) (p = 0.895). Likewise, there was no significant difference in the incidence of disabling arm pain in the disc bulge and herniation groups (84% vs 73%; p = 0.163), and no significant difference in the incidence of disabling neck pain in the two groups (70.5% (n = 31) vs 63% (n = 39); p = 0.491). At two years after surgery, no significant difference was found in any of the clinical parameters between the two groups. Conclusion. In patients with cervical radiculopathy, the type and extent of disc herniation measured on MRI prior to surgery correlated neither to the severity of the symptoms at presentation, nor to clinical outcomes at two years postoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1242–1248

Aims. The number of patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy has increased. In many countries, public hospitals have limited capacity. This has resulted in long waiting times for elective treatment and a need for supplementary private healthcare. It is uncertain whether the management of patients and the outcome of treatment are equivalent in public and private hospitals. The aim of this study was to compare the management and patient-reported outcomes among patients who underwent surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy in public and private hospitals in Norway, and to assess whether the effectiveness of the treatment was equivalent. Methods. This was a comparative study using prospectively collected data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. A total of 4,750 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy and were followed for 12 months were included. Case-mix adjustment between those managed in public and private hospitals was performed using propensity score matching. The primary outcome measure was the change in the Neck Disability Index (NDI) between baseline and 12 months postoperatively. A mean difference in improvement of the NDI score between public and private hospitals of ≤ 15 points was considered equivalent. Secondary outcome measures were a numerical rating scale for neck and arm pain and the EuroQol five-dimension three-level health questionnaire. The duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complications were also recorded. Results. The mean improvement from baseline to 12 months postoperatively of patients who underwent surgery in public and private hospitals was equivalent, both in the unmatched cohort (mean NDI difference between groups 3.9 points (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 5.6); p < 0.001) and in the matched cohort (4.0 points (95% CI 2.3 to 5.7); p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes showed similar results. The duration of surgery and length of hospital stay were significantly longer in public hospitals. Those treated in private hospitals reported significantly fewer complications in the unmatched cohort, but not in the matched cohort. Conclusion. The clinical effectiveness of surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy performed in public and private hospitals was equivalent 12 months after surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):64–71

Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of repeat epidural steroid injections as a form of treatment for patients with insufficiently controlled or recurrent radicular pain due to a lumbar or cervical disc herniation. Patients and Methods. A cohort of 102 patients was prospectively followed, after an epidural steroid injection for radicular symptoms due to lumbar disc herniation, in 57 patients, and cervical disc herniation, in 45 patients. Those patients with persistent pain who requested a second injection were prospectively followed for one year. Radicular and local pain were assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS), functional outcome with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or the Neck Pain and Disability Index (NPAD), as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-12). Results. A second injection was performed in 17 patients (29.8%) with lumbar herniation and seven (15.6%) with cervical herniation at a mean of 65.3 days . (sd. 46.5) and 47 days . (sd. 37.2), respectively, after the initial injection. All but one patient, who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy, responded satisfactorily with a mean VAS for leg pain of 8.8 mm . (sd. 10.3) and a mean VAS for arm pain of 6.3 mm . (. sd. 9) one year after the second injection, respectively. Similarly, functional outcome and HRQoL were improved significantly from the baseline scores: mean ODI, 12.3 (. sd. 12.4; p < 0.001); mean NPAD, 19.3 (. sd. 24.3; p = 0.041); mean SF-12 physical component summary (PCS) in lumbar herniation, 46.8 (. sd. 7.7; p < 0.001); mean SF-12 PCS in cervical herniation, 43 (. sd. 6.8; p = 0.103). Conclusion. Repeat steroid injections are a justifiable form of treatment in symptomatic patients with lumbar or cervical disc herniation whose symptoms are not satisfactorily relieved after the first injection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1364–71

Purpose of the study. To compare safety and efficacy of cervical disc replacement (CRD) in single and multilevel DDD. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Methods. 249 patients were enrolled. 171 patients were treated at 1-level, 41 treated at 2 levels and 2 patients were treated at 3 levels. Implant was also used adjacent to a fusion with a cage in 35 patients. The diagnosis was cervical degenerative disc disease between C3 and C7 with symptomatic DH. Population was 106 male 143 female, average age 46 (25-71). Clinical assessment included VAS scores for arm and neck pain and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Range of motion (ROM) from flexion/extension lateral view were measured. Results. Of all NDI scores recorded, 86,50 % demonstrated at least 15 points improvement at two years follow up from pre-op scores. 85,1% of VAS arm Pain scores demonstrated an improvement by = 2 points from pre-op scores and 50,8% for VAS neck Pain scores. The breakdown by levels and adjacent to an interbody cage shown that 80% of reported NDI scores demonstrated at least a 15 point improvement post operatively for two level disc replacement. 82,4% demonstrated a greater than 2 points improvement in VAS arm pain and 53,3% for VAS neck pain. For patients that received both implant and an interbody cage, 72,7% demonstrated a greater than 2 point improvement in VAS arm pain and 41,7% for VAS neck pain. Three (1,8%) cases of subsidence and 4 cases of implant loosening/displacement due to inappropriate sizing were reported. Available radiographic findings show on average a ROM of 8,2 ° at 2 years and an overall change in cervical lordosis of 5° from pre-op. Conclusion. Clinical outcomes demonstrated a significant improvement for both the total population (n=249) and for the single level total disc replacement population (n=171). Given these outstanding results single and multilevel TDR with this implant can be considered to be safe. No significant difference was observed between single and multilevel TDR groups regarding clinical, functional and radiological results. Follow up for this series need however to be extended for up to 5 years at least. The role of this implant in multilevel cases as well as in cases to a fused level still need further evaluation although these preliminary results are encouraging

Introduction. This study aims to evaluate the impact of associated psychological co-morbidities (Depression/Anxiety), smoking history, gender, work benefits and employment status on the clinical outcome following anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR). Materials and Methods. We included in our study 100 patients who underwent ACDR in our Spinal Unit (between May 2006 – May 2010). We used as clinical outcome measures: Visual Analogue Score for neck pain (VAS-NP) and arm pain (VAS-AP), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Bodily Pain (SF36-BP) component of the Short Form 36 questionnaire. Statistics were obtained using SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Independent sample t-test for normally distributed data and Man-Whitney U test for non-parametric data were used. Statistical significance was designated at p < 0.05. Results. There were 48 males and 52 females. Average age at operation was 52.96 years (Range 38-80) for males and 49.79 years (Range 31-71) for females. Average duration of follow up was 14.4 months (Range 6-35). Out of 100 patients, 28 patients had a history of anxiety/depression, 19 patients were smokers, 47 were actively working and 23 were receiving work benefits. We found that gender, smoking status, associated co-morbidities, working and benefit status had no statistically significant contribution to clinical outcome measures in the follow up period. For example, in the sub-group of non-smokers versus smokers, there was no significant difference in NDI (p=0.78), VAS-AP (p=0.12), SF-BP (p= 0.83) and VAS-NP (p=0.08). Conclusion. We conclude that in our study there was no statistically significant contribution of the associated psychosocial factors on the clinical outcomes following ACDR

To assess the clinical and radiological outcome of single and multiple level Anterior Cervical Disc Replacement (ACDR) using Peek-on-peek system. We present the largest series of POPCDR at a single centre. Thirty-one patients with radiculopathy and/or myelopathy caused by disc generation who did not respond to conservative treatments were included. Pain and function were evaluated by VAS (Visual Analogue Score) for neck (VAS-NP) and arm pain (VAS-AP). Neck disability index (NDI) and SF-36 questionnaires were completed. Disc height and segmental angular correction (SAC) were measured on radiographs pre- and postoperatively. Seven patients had one-level, fifteen had two-level, seven had three-level and two had four-level ACDR. Sixty-six discs were replaced. Average follow-up was six months. Mean VAS-NP improved from 7.27 to 3.93 and VAS-AP from 7.27 to 3.4. Mean SF-36 improved from 32.21 to 40.22. There was functional improvement for NDI in all patients. There was an improvement in SAC from 5.4. ° . to 8.0. ° . for one-level, 3.1. °. to 7.5. °. for two level, 8.4. °. to 9.4. °. for three-level and 5.8. °. to 26.7. °. for four-level ACDR. Post-operative anterior disc height increased by 152% for lower and 55% for higher levels. Similar improvements were noted for posterior disc heights. Early results show that POPCDR is safe and effective for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. The clinical and radiological outcomes are similar to other types of ACDR reported in literature. POPCDR also allows safe use of MRI during follow-up with fewer artifacts giving it an edge over other systems

Background. We present the results of a single centre, prospective study to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior cervical decompression and replacement (ACDR) using the NuNec(tm) Cervical Arthroplasty System (Pioneer Surgical Technology, Marquette, Mich., USA). Methodology and Results. 36 patients with radiculopathy/myelopathy, who failed to respond to conservative measures, were included. Pain and function were evaluated by Visual Analogue score for Neck pain (VAS-NP) and Arm pain (VAS-AP), Neck disability index (NDI) and SF-36 questionnaires. Radiological assessments include assessing overall range of movement (ROM) and at functional segment unit (FSU). Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS 16.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Appropriate parametric (A paired t-test) and non parametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) were used to assess the statistical significance (p<0.05). The average age at operation was 51 years (range 35 - 77years). 8 patients received ACDR at one-level, 15 had 2-level surgery, 12 had 3-level surgery and 1 had a 4-level surgery. At the time of final follow-up (Mean 14.25 months, Range 12- 22.5 months) the mean NDI improved from 49.35; to 33.78 (p< 0.001). There statistically significant improvement note in VAS-NP (Post-op3.65, Pre-op:8.16, p<0.001), VAS-AP (Post-op:3.12, Pre-op:7.32, p<0.001) and SF-36BP (pre-op:29.15, post-op:37.18, p<0.002). The overall global ROM movement was preserved (pre-op:46.80±10.52, post-op:45.04±11.53) and an improvement in ROM at FSU was observed (pre-op:16.60±8.50, post-op:20.22±12.22) at final follow–up. Conclusion. Our results of ACDR using the NuNec(tm) disc show statistically significant improvement in the outcome measures that are comparable to other types of ACDR. In addition, preservation of global cervical spine ROM and improvement in FSU ROM was observed despite single or multiple levels ACDR. Furthermore, NuNec(tm) ACDR gives excellent quality MR image during post-operative period. In our preliminary results, we report that NuNec(tm) ACDR device is safe, effective and has added design benefits

Aims

We performed a retrospective, comparative study of elderly patients with an increased risk from anaesthesia who had undergone either anterior screw fixation (ASF) or halo vest immobilisation (HVI) for a type II odontoid fracture.

We conducted a prospective follow-up MRI study of originally asymptomatic healthy subjects to clarify the development of Modic changes in the cervical spine over a ten-year period and to identify related factors. Previously, 497 asymptomatic healthy volunteers with no history of cervical trauma or surgery underwent MRI. Of these, 223 underwent a second MRI at a mean follow-up of 11.6 years (10 to 12.7). These 223 subjects comprised 133 men and 100 women with a mean age at second MRI of 50.5 years (23 to 83). Modic changes were classified as not present and types 1 to 3. Changes in Modic types over time and relationships between Modic changes and progression of degeneration of the disc or clinical symptoms were evaluated. A total of 31 subjects (13.9%) showed Modic changes at follow-up: type 1 in nine, type 2 in 18, type 3 in two, and types 1 and 2 in two. Modic changes at follow-up were significantly associated with numbness or pain in the arm, but not with neck pain or shoulder stiffness. Age (≥ 40 years), gender (male), and pre-existing disc degeneration were significantly associated with newly developed Modic changes.

In the cervical spine over a ten-year period, type 2 Modic changes developed most frequently. Newly developed Modic changes were significantly associated with age, gender, and pre-existing disc degeneration.

We describe three patients with pre-ganglionic (avulsion) injuries of the brachial plexus which caused a partial Brown-Séquard syndrome.