Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that can occur after total joint replacement surgery. With increasing antimicrobial resistance, there is a need for non-antibiotic approaches to treat and prevent PJI. Doping calcium phosphates with antimicrobial ions shows promise for these purposes. This systematic review aims to search and summarise the evidence-base for the potential of calcium phosphates doped with different antimicrobial ions. A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web-Of-Science, Cochrane Library and Emcare of in vitro and animal studies on the antimicrobial activity of (co)substituted calcium phosphates according to PRIMSA guidelines.. The research protocol, listing search terms and in/exclusion criteria, was registered a priori at . https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HEP18U. Data was extracted regarding ions, micro-organisms and antimicrobial activity. The search retrieved 1017 hits of which 148 papers were included. The substitution of 33 different ions was reported. Silver (n= 46), zinc (n=39), copper (n=18) and magnesium (n=14) were the most commonly doped ions. 36 different micro-organisms were studied of which E. coli (n=109), S. aureus (n=99), and C. albicans (n=22) were the most common. 6 different outcomes were reported, most commonly the K-ratio (n=53), the log CFU (n=41) and the bacterial inhibition zone (n=39). A validated outcome for the evaluation of biofilm prevention was lacking. There was considerable heterogeneity in studied ions, micro-organisms and reported outcomes. A lack of clearly defined reporting guidelines in the field of antimicrobial materials has led to the use of clinically irrelevant micro-organisms and a general lack of consistency of the methods used and the reported results. Currently, there is no universally accepted measure for the effectiveness required from biomaterials for treatment and prevention of PJI

The most challenging complications in orthopaedic trauma surgery are fracture-related infections (FRI). The incidence ranges from approximately 1% after closed fractures or joint replacement, to more than 30% in complex open limb fractures. Despite tremendous efforts with prolonged antibiotic therapy and multiple revision surgeries, these complications are associated with considerable rates of recurrent infections as well as permanent functional impairment. The primary aim for the clinician is to prevent infection, because once established, an infection is difficult to eradicate. The main reason for this is biofilm formation on the implanted device, which allows pathogens to protect themselves from host immune response and antimicrobial therapy. In open fractures with a considerable wound contamination and soft- tissue damage, systemically-delivered antibiotics may not reach sufficient local concentrations to eradicate the bacteria. Locally delivered antibiotics can overcome this problem by providing high local concentrations. Currently, several antibiotic loaded biomaterials for local infection prophylaxis and/or treatment are available. In this talk, next to the diagnostic challenges of FRIs, the currently available antimicrobial-loaded biomaterials will be described. Against a backdrop of increasing infection and antimicrobial resistance, the prudent use and availability of such materials will become even more important

Introduction:. Antimicrobial resistance is an important patient safety issue. Antibiotic Stewardship is one of the key strategies in tackling this problem. We present our data over a two year period from October 2011 to December 2013. Method:. A multidisciplinary, consultant led antibiotic ward round was implemented in October 2011. This involved the consultant orthopaedic surgeon, microbiologist, pharmacist and antibiotic prescription nurse. Data from the meetings was collected prospectively over a 118 week period using a standard data form. The case notes, prescription kardex, laboratory results including microbiology data and clinical information of patients was available at the time of the Ward round. The indications for, choice of antibiotics, duration and further treatment plan were made and a note for the case notes was dictated immediately. Changes to prescriptions were also made at the time. Results:. Over the first 2 years 269 patients were reviewed. We noticed a 22% decrease in the volume of IV antibiotic prescriptions. 35% of antibiotic prescriptions were de-escalated (reducing the dose or narrowing the spectrum), however 9% required escalation. 2% of prescriptions were stopped for being clinically not required any more. There was 48% decrease in costs of IV antibiotics and 30% decrease in total cost of oral and IV antimicrobials. Discussion:. We find that this exercise leads to a clear, documented, more cohesive approach to patients' treatment which improves patient care. It makes the orthopaedic consultant and on call team aware of all patients on antibiotics and the plan for the following week. Conclusion:. Antibiotic Stewardship in our hospital has led to the decrease in the use of antibiotics and reduced costs along with several other soft benefits in patient treatment. Given the rising problem of antibiotic resistance, this key pillar strategy against it should be implemented in all hospitals