Aims. The current evidence comparing the two most common approaches for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), the deltopectoral and anterosuperior approach, is limited. This study aims to compare the rate of loosening, instability, and implant survival between the two approaches for rTSA using data from the Dutch National Arthroplasty Registry with a minimum follow-up of five years. Methods. All patients in the registry who underwent a primary rTSA between January 2014 and December 2016 using an anterosuperior or deltopectoral approach were included, with a minimum follow-up of five years. Cox and logistic regression models were used to assess the association between the approach and the implant survival, instability, and glenoid loosening, independent of confounders. Results. In total, 3,902 rTSAs were included. A deltopectoral approach was used in 54% (2,099/3,902) and an anterosuperior approach in 46% (1,803/3,902). Overall, the mean age in the cohort was 75 years (50 to 96) and the most common indication for rTSA was cuff tear arthropathy (35%; n = 1,375), followed by osteoarthritis (29%; n = 1,126), acute fracture (13%; n = 517), post-traumatic sequelae (10%; n = 398), and an irreparable cuff rupture (5%; n = 199). The two high-volume centres performed the anterosuperior approach more often compared to the medium- and low-volume centres (p < 0.001). Of the 3,902 rTSAs, 187 were revised (5%), resulting in a five-year survival of 95.4% (95% confidence interval 94.7 to 96.0; 3,137 at risk). The most common reason for revision was a periprosthetic joint infection (35%; n = 65), followed by instability (25%; n = 46) and loosening (25%; n = 46). After correcting for relevant confounders, the revision rate for glenoid loosening, instability, and the overall implant survival did not differ significantly between the two approaches (p = 0.494, p = 0.826, and p = 0.101, respectively). Conclusion. The surgical approach used for rTSA did not influence the overall implant survival or the revision rate for instability or glenoid loosening. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(9):1000–1006

The shape of the glenoid can vary between pear and oval, depending on the presence of a glenoid notch. We measured the glenoid notch angle (the angle between the superior and inferior part of the anterior glenoid rim) in 53 embalmed cadavers and investigated its relationship with the labral attachment to the glenoid at that point. The attachment of the anterosuperior labrum at the site of the glenoid notch was classified as tight or loose or, in some cases, there was a sublabral foramen. The anterior labrum was then removed and digital images perpendicular to the glenoid notch were taken. Using a digital image analysis program, the angle of the glenoid notch was measured. In 37 shoulders (70%) the attachment of the labrum at the site of the glenoid notch was assessed as tight and in eight (15%) as loose. In eight shoulders (15%) a sublabral foramen was found. The mean glenoid notch angle was 153° in the loosely attached group, 159° in the sublabral foramen group and 168° in the group with a tight attachment. The presence of a glenoid notch was noted only when the glenoid notch angle was less than 170°. The glenoid notch angle is related to the attachment of the labrum. In the presence of a glenoid notch, there is more likely to be a loosely attached labrum or sublabral foramen. The loose attachment of the anterosuperior labrum may be a predisposing factor in traumatic anterior instability

Aims. Acetabular edge-loading was a cause of increased wear rates in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties, ultimately contributing to their failure. Although such wear patterns have been regularly reported in retrieval analyses, this study aimed to determine their in vivo location and investigate their relationship with acetabular component positioning. Methods. 3D CT imaging was combined with a recently validated method of mapping bearing surface wear in retrieved hip implants. The asymmetrical stabilizing fins of Birmingham hip replacements (BHRs) allowed the co-registration of their acetabular wear maps and their computational models, segmented from CT scans. The in vivo location of edge-wear was measured within a standardized coordinate system, defined using the anterior pelvic plane. Results. Edge-wear was found predominantly along the superior acetabular edge in all cases, while its median location was 8° (interquartile range (IQR) -59° to 25°) within the anterosuperior quadrant. The deepest point of these scars had a median location of 16° (IQR -58° to 26°), which was statistically comparable to their centres (p = 0.496). Edge-wear was in closer proximity to the superior apex of the cups with greater angles of acetabular inclination, while a greater degree of anteversion influenced a more anteriorly centred scar. Conclusion. The anterosuperior location of edge-wear was comparable to the degradation patterns observed in acetabular cartilage, supporting previous findings that hip joint forces are directed anteriorly during a greater portion of walking gait. The further application of this novel method could improve the current definition of optimal and safe acetabular component positioning. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(10):639–649

The advent of modular porous metal augments has ushered in a new form of treatment for acetabular bone loss. The function of an augment can be seen as reducing the size of a defect or reconstituting the anterosuperior/posteroinferior columns and/or allowing supplementary fixation. Depending on the function of the augment, the surgeon can decide on the sequence of introduction of the hemispherical shell, before or after the augment. Augments should always, however, be used with cement to form a unit with the acetabular component. Given their versatility, augments also allow the use of a hemispherical shell in a position that restores the centre of rotation and biomechanics of the hip. Progressive shedding or the appearance of metal debris is a particular finding with augments and, with other radiological signs of failure, should be recognized on serial radiographs. Mid- to long-term outcomes in studies reporting the use of augments with hemispherical shells in revision total hip arthroplasty have shown rates of survival of > 90%. However, a higher risk of failure has been reported when augments have been used for patients with chronic pelvic discontinuity. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(4):312–318

The October 2023 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360. looks at: Arthroscopic capsular shift surgery in patients with atraumatic shoulder joint instability: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial; Superior capsular reconstruction partially restores native glenohumeral loads in a dynamic model; Gene expression in glenoid articular cartilage varies in acute instability, chronic instability, and osteoarthritis; Intra-articular injection versus interscalene brachial plexus block for acute-phase postoperative pain management after arthroscopic shoulder surgery; Level of pain catastrophizing rehab in subacromial impingement: secondary analyses from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (the SExSI Trial); Anterosuperior versus deltopectoral approach for primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a study of 3,902 cases from the Dutch National Arthroplasty Registry with a minimum follow-up of five years; Assessment of progression and clinical relevance of stress-shielding around press-fit radial head arthroplasty: a comparative study of two implants; A number of modifiable and non-modifiable factors increase the risk for elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament injury in baseball players: a systematic review

Abstract. OBJECTIVES. Although surgical periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for hip dysplasia aims to optimise acetabular coverage and restore hip function, it is unclear how surgery affects capsular mechanics and joint stability. The purpose was to examine how the reoriented acetabular coverage affects capsular mechanics and joint stability in dysplastic hips. METHODS. Twelve cadaveric dysplastic hips (n = 12) were denuded to the capsule and mounted onto a robotic tester. The robot positioned each hip in multiple flexion angles (Extension, Neutral 0°, Flexion 30°, Flexion 60°, Flexion 90°) and performed internal-external rotations and abduction-adduction to 5 Nm in each rotational or planar direction. Each hip underwent a PAO, preserving the capsule, and was retested postoperatively in the robot. Paired sample t-tests compared the range of motion before and after PAO surgery (CI = 95%). RESULTS. Pre-operatively, the dysplastic hips demonstrated large ranges of internal-external rotations and abduction-adduction motions throughout all flexion positions. Post-operatively, the PAO slackenend the anterosuperior capsule and tightened the inferior capsule. This increased external rotation in Flexion 60° and Flexion 90° (∆. ER. = +16 and +23%) but provided lateral coverage to decrease internal rotation at Flexion 90° (∆. IR. = –15%). The PAO also reduced abduction throughout, but increased adduction in Neutral 0°, Flexion 30°, and Flexion 60° (∆. ADD. = +34, +30%, +29% respectively). CONCLUSIONS. The PAO provided crucial osseous structural coverage to the femoral head, decreasing hypermobility and adverse loading at extreme hip flexion-extension. However, it also slackened the anterosuperior capsule and increased adduction and external rotation, which may lead to ischiofemoral impingement and adductor irritations. Capsular instability may be secondary to acetabular undercoverage, thus capsular alteration may be warranted for larger corrections or rotational osteotomies. To preserve native hip and delay joint degeneration, it is crucial to preserve capsule and elucidate amount of reorientation needed without causing iatrogenic instability. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

While reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a reliable treatment option for patients with rotator cuff deficiency, loss of glenoid baseplate fixation often occurs due to screw loosening. We questioned whether an analysis of the trabecular bone density distribution in the scapula would indicate more optimal sites for screw placement. As such, the purpose of this study was to determine the anatomic distribution of trabecular bone density in regions of the scapula available for screw placement in RSA. Seven cadaveric shoulders were computed tomography (CT) scanned, and then voxels of the scapulae were isolated from the CT volume (Mimics 15.0 Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Analyses were conducted in a common, 3D coordinate system. Volumetric regions of interest (ROI) within the scapula were identified based on potential baseplate screw sites. ROIs included areas at the base of the coracoid process lateral and inferior to the suprascapular notch, in the posterior and anterior lateral spine and in the anterosuperior and posteroinferior lateral border. Hounsfield Units (HU) were extracted from voxels corresponding to trabecular bone within each ROI. Overall bone density was summarised as the frequency of HU values above 80% of the ROI's maximum density value. Paired, two-tailed t-tests assuming unequal variance were used for pairwise comparisons (P≤0.05). Intra-region analyses compared two ROIs within the same broad anatomical structure; inter-region analyses compared ROIs between anatomical structures. Areas of the spine and lateral border of the scapula appeared to be denser than the coracoid process. Intra-region comparisons indicated no significant differences within ROI: coracoid P=0.43, spine P=0.95, lateral border P=0.41. ROI inferior to the suprascapular notch were on average 3.78% (P=0.08) and 6% (P=0.04) less dense than the anterosuperior and posteroinferior lateral border and 7.59% (P=0.006) and 7.72% (P=0.01) less dense than the anterior and posterior lateral spine. ROI lateral to the suprascapular notch were 6% (P=0.05) and 8.21% (P=0.02) less dense than the anterosuperior and posteroinferior lateral border and 9.8% (P=0.006) and 9.94% (P=0.008) less dense than the anterior and posterior lateral spine. There was no significant difference between the anterior spine and anterosuperior and posteroinferior lateral border (P=0.12, P=0.58), nor between the posterior spine and anterosuperior and posteroinferior lateral border (P=0.14, P=0.57). Results from this study indicate that the spine and lateral border of the scapula contain denser trabecular bone relative to regions in the coracoid. The higher quality bone of the spine and lateral border should be favoured over the coracoid process when fixing the glenoid baseplate in RSA. Further research may support the redesign of the glenoid baseplate geometry to better integrate the anatomy of the scapula and improve implant survival

We analysed 54 alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings from total hip replacements retrieved at one centre after a mean duration of 3.5 years (0.2 to 10.6) in situ. These implants were obtained from 54 patients (16 men and 38 women) with a mean age of 67 years (33 to 88) who underwent revision for a variety of reasons. Posterior edge loading was found in the majority of these retrievals (32 out of 54). Anterosuperior edge loading occurred less often but produced a higher rate of wear. Stripe wear on the femoral heads had a median volumetric wear rate of 0.2 mm. 3. /year (0 to 7.2). The wear volume on the femoral heads corresponded to the width of edge wear on the matching liner. Anteversion of the acetabular component was found to be a more important determinant than inclination for wear in ceramic bearings. Posterior edge loading may be considered to be a normal occurrence in ceramic-on-ceramic bearings, with minimal clinical consequences. Edge loading should be defined as either anterosuperior or posterior, as each edge loading mechanism may result in different clinical implications

We carried out a morphometric analysis of the acetabulum following Dega osteotomy in patients with cerebral palsy using three-dimensional CT. We assessed 17 acetabula in 12 patients with instability of the hip. A Dega osteotomy and varus derotation femoral osteotomy were performed in all 17 hips. Three-dimensional CT scans were taken before and approximately one year after operation. Acetabular cover was evaluated using anterosuperior, superolateral and posterosuperior acetabular indices, and the change in the acetabular volume was calculated. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. After the osteotomy, the anterosuperior, superolateral and posterosuperior cover had improved significantly towards the value seen in a control group. The mean acetabular volume increased by 68%

The purpose of this study is to quantify the distribution of bone density in the scapulae of patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to guide optimal screw placement. To achieve this aim, we compared bone density in regions around the glenoid that are targeted for screw placement, as well as bone density variations medial to lateral within the glenoid. Specimen included twelve scapula in 12 patients with a mean age of 74 years (standard deviation = 9.2 years). Each scapula underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan with a Lightspeed+ XCR 16-Slice CT scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, USA). Three-dimensional (three-D) surface mesh models and masks of the scapulae containing three-D voxel locations along with the relative Hounsfield Units (HU) were created. Regions of interest (ROI) were selected based on their potential glenoid baseplate screw positioning in RSA surgery. These included the base of coracoid inferior and lateral to the suprascapular notch, an anterior and posterior portion of the scapular spine, and an anterosuperior and inferior portion of the lateral border. Five additional regions resembling a clock face, on the glenoid articular surface were then selected to analyze medial to lateral variations in bone density including twelve, three, six, and nine-o'clock positions as well as a central region. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tests were used to examine statistical differences in bone density between each region of interest (p < 0 .05). For the regional evaluation, the coracoid lateral to the suprascapular notch was significantly less dense than the inferior portion of the lateral border (mean difference = 85.6 HU, p=0.03), anterosuperior portion of the lateral border (mean difference = 82.7 HU, p=0.04), posterior spine (mean difference = 97.6 HU, p=0.007), and anterior spine (mean difference = 99.3 HU, p=0.006). For the medial to lateral evaluation, preliminary findings indicate a “U” pattern with the densest regions of bone in the glenoid most medially and most laterally with a region of less dense bone in-between. The results from this study utilizing clinical patient CT scans, showed similar results to those found in our previous cadaveric study where the coracoid region was significantly less dense than regions around the lateral scapular border and scapular spine. We also have found for medial to lateral bone density, a “U” distribution with the densest regions of bone most medially and most laterally in the glenoid, with a region of less dense bone between most medial and most lateral. Clinical applications for our results include a carefully planned trajectory when placing screws in the scapula, potentially avoiding the base of coracoid. Additionally, surgeons may choose variable screw lengths depending on the region of bone and its variation of density medial to lateral, and that screws that pass beyond the most lateral (subchondral) bone, will only achieve further purchase if they enter the denser bone more medially. We suspect that if surgeons strategically aim screw placement for the regions of higher bone density, they may be able to decrease micromotion in baseplate fixation and increase the longevity of RSA

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) – enlarged, aspherical femoral head deformity (cam-type) or retroversion/overcoverage of the acetabulum (pincer-type) – is a leading cause for early hip osteoarthritis. Although anteverting/reverse periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) to address FAI aims to preserve the native hip and restore joint function, it is still unclear how it affects joint mobility and stability. This in vitro cadaveric study examined the effects of surgical anteverting PAO on range of motion and capsular mechanics in hips with acetabular retroversion. Twelve cadaveric hips (n = 12, m:f = 9:3; age = 41 ± 9 years; BMI = 23 ± 4 kg/m2) were included in this study. Each hip was CT imaged and indicated acetabular retroversion (i.e., crossover sign, posterior wall sign, ischial wall sign, retroversion index > 20%, axial plane acetabular version < 15°); and showed no other abnormalities on CT data. Each hip was denuded to the bone-and-capsule and mounted onto a 6-DOF robot tester (TX90, Stäubli), equipped with a universal force-torque sensor (Omega85, ATI). The robot positioned each hip in five sagittal angles: Extension, Neutral 0°, Flexion 30°, Flexion 60°, Flexion 90°; and performed hip internal-external rotations and abduction-adduction motions to 5 Nm in each position. After the intact stage was tested, each hip underwent an anteverting PAO, anteverting the acetabulum and securing the fragment with long bone screws. The capsular ligaments were preserved during the surgery and each hip was retested postoperatively in the robot. Postoperative CT imaging confirmed that the acetabular fragment was properly positioned with adequate version and head coverage. Paired sample t-tests compared the differences in range of motion before and after PAO (CI = 95%; SPSS v.24, IBM). Preoperatively, the intact hips with acetabular retroversion demonstrated constrained internal-external rotations and abduction-adduction motions. The PAO reoriented the acetabular fragment and medialized the hip joint centre, which tightened the iliofemoral ligament and slackenend the pubofemoral ligament. Postoperatively, internal rotation increased in the deep hip flexion positions of Flexion 60° (∆IR = +7°, p = 0.001) and Flexion 90° (∆IR = +8°, p = 0.001); while also demonstrating marginal decreases in external rotation in all positions. In addition, adduction increased in the deep flexion positions of Flexion 60° (∆ADD = +11°, p = 0.002) and Flexion 90° (∆ADD = +12°, p = 0.001); but also showed marginal increases in abduction in all positions. The anteverting PAO restored anterosuperior acetabular clearance and increased internal rotation (28–33%) and adduction motions (29–31%) in deep hip flexion. Restricted movements and positive impingement tests typically experienced in these positions with acetabular retroversion are associated with clinical symptoms of FAI (i.e., FADIR). However, PAO altered capsular tensions by further tightening the anterolateral hip capsule which resulted in a limited external rotation and a stiffer and tighter hip. Capsular tightness may still be secondary to acetabular retroversion, thus capsular management may be warranted for larger corrections or rotational osteotomies. In efforts to optimize surgical management and clinical outcomes, anteverting PAO is a viable option to address FAI due to acetabular retroversion or overcoverage

Object. CT-based navigation system in total hip arthroplasty(THA) is widely used to achieve accurate implant placement. However, its internal structure was a trade secret. Therefore, it was hard to analyze optimal reference points. Now, we developed our own CT-based navigation system originally, and since then we have been conducting various analyses in order to use the system more effectively. The purpose of this study was to analyze the optimal area and the number of registration points, which enables to move initial errors into the acceptable range. Methods. We set the anterior pelvic plane(APP) as the reference plane, and defined the coordinates as follows: X-axis for external direction, Y-axis for anterior direction, and Z-axis for proximal direction. We made pelvic bone models after THA, a normal shape and acetabular dysplasia model, and performed registration using an originally developed CT based navigation system. At first, we registered point paired matching at 4 points, and surface matching was performed at 53 points, which were placed around the acetabulum. 20 points were on anterosuperior, 10 points were on posterosuperior, 20 points were on posterior around the acetabulum, and 3 points were on the pubis. We selected surface matching points based on the actual operation approach, calculated the accuracy of the error correction, and searched the optimal area and the number of surface matching points. Results. Initial error could correct under 2mm gradually more than 20 surface matching points on anterosuperior area of the acetabular, assumed anterolateral approach. Initial error correction was improved by adding the reference points on the pubis. In comparison with the initial error on the X-axis, corrections of the Y-axis and Z-axis were more difficult. Initial error could correct under 2mm with around 20 surface matching points on posterior area of the acetabulum, assumed posterior approach, initial error on the Y-axis direction had difficulty in correction similarly. The difference of the shape of the pelvic effected initial error correction, it was more difficult to correct initial error on Y, Z-axis on dysplasia hip. Discussion. To correct initial error needs more than 20 surface matching points at least on the both anterolateral and posterior approaches. However, it is hard to correct initial error depending on surface matching points on the Y-axis, so it is desirable to return to point paired matching. On the registration of anterosuperior area of the acetabulum, correction of the initial error improved effectively by adding reference points on the pubis in this study, so to get reference points on the pubis is recommended if possible. Moreover, it was hard to correct initial error on the Z-axis because reference points on the anterosuperior of the acetabulum were flat, therefore it is necessary to reduce the initial error on Z-axis, we should consider choosing other reference points such as on the iliac crests which can define Z-axis direction. When using the navigation system on pelvic, some tendencies and characteristics exist, and understanding them can make the operation smooth and precisely

Aims. Asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction is common in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and usually quantified using the alpha angle on radiographs or MRI. The aim of this study was to determine the natural alpha angle in a large cohort of patients by continuous circumferential analysis with CT. Methods. CT scans of 1312 femurs of 656 patients were analyzed in this cross-sectional study. There were 362 men and 294 women. Their mean age was 61.2 years (18 to 93). All scans had been performed for reasons other than hip disease. Digital circumferential analysis allowed continuous determination of the alpha angle around the entire head-neck junction. All statistical tests were conducted two-sided; a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. The mean maximum alpha angle for the cohort was 59.0° (. sd. 9.4). The maximum was located anterosuperiorly at 01:36 on the clock face, with two additional maxima of asphericity at the posterior and inferior head-neck junction. The mean alpha angle was significantly larger in men (59.4°, . sd. 8.0) compared with women (53.5°, . sd. 7.4°; p = 0.0005), and in Caucasians (60.7°, . sd. 9.0°) compared with Africans (56.3°, . sd. 8.0; p = 0.007) and Asians (50.8°, . sd. 7.2; p = 0.0005). The alpha angle showed a weak positive correlation with age (p < 0.05). If measured at commonly used planes of the radially reconstructed CT or MRI, the alpha angle was largely underestimated; measurement at the 01:30 and 02:00 positions showed a mean underestimation of 4° and 6°, respectively. Conclusion. This study provides important data on the normal alpha angle dependent on age, gender, and ethnic origin. The normal alpha angle in men is > 55°, and this should be borne in mind when making a diagnosis of cam-type morphology. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:570–8

Introduction. Definition-in this presentation, the discussion will not include reparable cuff deficiency, as this is handled with standard arthroplasty techniques combined with cuff repair. Factors that affect decision-making. Kinematics-fixed fulcrum or not. Bone loss. Deltoid integrity. Coracoacromial arch integrity. Age. Activity level. Options. Hemiarthroplasty. “ Extended head” hemiarthroplasty. Arthroplasty + tendon transfer. Constrained arthroplasty – currently not FDA approved in USA. Arthrodesis. Evaluation. History and physical examination. ? Prior surgery. ? Overhead function – does fixed-fulcrum kinematics exist even if the head is not centred. ? Anterosuperior instability – lack of fixedfulcrum kinematics. Cuff strength. Deltoid integrity. Radiographs – bone loss, especially glenoid. Other imaging studies not necessary. Arthroplasty. Hemiarthroplasty. Best if fixed fulcrum kinematics exists – intact CA arch, intact deltoid, at or above shoulder elevation. Technical considerations. Preserve deltoid. Preserve coracoacromial ligament, acromion. ? Preserve remaining subscapularis – make humeral cut superiorly, through the rotator cuff defect. Alternatively, take down subscapularis and capsule in one layer, mobilise and repair or transpose superiorly. Increase retroversion of humeral cut- be careful of posterior cuff (teres minor) attachment. Glenoid deficiency – especially if anterior or anterosuperior instability is present. May need to graft glenoid with head. Humeral head size-the same size or slightly larger than the one removed; avoid overstuffing. “Extended head” hemiarthroplasty (CTA head). Indications same as hemiarthroplasty. Advantages. Provides resurfacing of greater tuberosity, which is articulating with the acromion and often irregular. Potentially improves kinematics by providing a “pain free” fulcrum. Technical considerations. Difficult but not impossible to do through a superior, subscapularis sparing approach. Special jig required for cutting tuberosity. Preserve CA arch. Preserve deltoid. Increase retroversion (be careful of remaining posterior cuff attachment). Glenoid deficiency – especially if anterior or anterosuperior instability is present. May need to graft glenoid with head. Humeral head size-the same size or slightly larger than the one removed; avoid overstuffing. Hemiarthroplasty + tendon transfer. Indications. Complete subscapularis deficiency. Posterior cuff insufficiency with anterosuperior subluxation or dislocation. Techniques. Latissimus transfer – posterior cuff insufficiency. Pectoralis major transfer – subscapularis insufficiency. Deep to conjoined tendon (Resch). Superficial to conjoined tendon (Rockwood and Wirth). Combined. Constrained arthroplasty. Not FDA approved in US. Delta III – reverse prosthesis. Reasonable results with medium-term follow-up in Europe (5–10 years). Rehabilitation. Limited goals. Primary goals are pain relief and stability. Passive flexion to 90°, passive ER to 30° for 4 weeks. Advance stretches and add active range of motion and active assisted range of motion (overhead pulley) at 4 weeks. Strengthening – 6 weeks. Results. Less predictable and less functional overall than most other disease categories (e.g., OA). Average elevation in most series is 120°. Usually good pain relief except in patients with anterosuperior subluxation

Acetabular bone loss is a challenging problem facing the revision total hip replacement surgeon. Reconstruction of the acetabulum depends on the presence of anterosuperior and posteroinferior pelvic column support for component fixation and stability. The Paprosky classification is most commonly used when determining the location and degree of acetabular bone loss. Augments serve the function of either providing primary construct stability or supplementary fixation. . When a pelvic discontinuity is encountered we advocate the use of an acetabular distraction technique with a jumbo cup and modular porous metal acetabular augments for the treatment of severe acetabular bone loss and associated chronic pelvic discontinuity. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B(11 Suppl A):36–42

The treatment of severe acetabular bone loss is challenging, especially in the setting of an associated chronic pelvic discontinuity. There are several available treatment options for chronic pelvic discontinuity, each of which has its own disadvantages. One of the major difficulties with this entity, regardless of the reconstructive technique chosen, is the inability to obtain reproducible healing of the discontinuity. We evaluated the use of acetabular distraction, a technique which achieves peripheral or lateral distraction and central or medial compression across the discontinuity. We recommend acetabular distraction to allow for implantation of a stable construct, achieve biologic fixation and increase the likelihood of discontinuity healing. In this multi-center trial, 32 patients that underwent acetabular revision for a chronic pelvic discontinuity using acetabular distraction were radiographically evaluated at a minimum of 25 months (range, 25 to 160 months). The study cohort was categorized according to the Paprosky acetabular bone loss classification: seven (22%) type IIC, five (16%) type IIIA, and 20 (62%) type IIIB defects. Fourteen (70%) of the 20 patients with a type IIIB acetabular bone loss pattern required use of augments for acetabular reconstruction. Of the 32 patients, 1 (3%) patient required a revision for aseptic loosening, 2 (6%) patients had evidence of radiographic loosening but were not revised, and 3 (9%) patients had migration of the acetabular component into a more stable position. Radiographically, 22 (69%) of the cohort demonstrated healing of the discontinuity. The Kaplan-Meier construct survivorship was 83.3% when using aseptic acetabular loosening as an end-point. During this study, the authors created a new pelvic discontinuity classification based on the type of reconstruction required. The classification mirrors the Paprosky acetabular bone loss classification. A Type I chronic pelvic discontinuity required jumbo cup reconstruction without augments. A type II discontinuity required the use of an augment for an extracavitary defect. A type III discontinuity required an augment for an intracavitary defect. Type III defects were further subdivided into type IIIA and IIIB discontinuity. Type IIIA discontinuities utilized an augment to reconstruct the anterosuperior and/or posteroinferior column defect for primary stability of the overall construct. Type IIIB discontinuities utilized augments to reconstruct the anterosuperior and/or posteroinferior column defect for primary stability as well as a posterosuperior augment for supplemental fixation. All augments were unitized to the cup with cement. Type IV defects were massive defects that required the use of two orange-slice augments, secured together with screws and placed centrally to restore the defect, and a cup implanted and unitized to the augments with cement. According to this new classification, the discontinuity reconstructions in our study were classified as follows: 12 (38%) type I, 8 (25%) type II, 6 (19%) type IIIA, 6 (19%) type IIIB, and 0 as type IV. Acetabular distraction technique demonstrates favorable radiographic outcomes with reproducible discontinuity healing in a majority of cases. This alternative technique allows for biologic fixation and intra-operative customization of the construct to be implanted based on the bone loss pattern present following component removal

In diagnosis and repair of partial subscapularis tendon tears, we used a simplified arthroscopic direct technique. We used the anterosuperior arthroscopic portal to visualise the subscapularis tendon insertion, while probing and repairing from the adjacent anterior portal. Three anatomical dissections were done to define the insertion of the subscapularis tendon at the lesser tuberosity. While viewing from the anterosuperior portal, we repaired the subscapularis tendon with one or two suture anchors, inserted into the lesser tuberosity from the anterior portal. Suture management was via the standard posterior portal. From the anterior portal, a tendon-penetrating grasping device passed the sutures through the displaced subscapularis tendon. The arthroscopic knots were tied from the anterior portal. Associated with the first 10 subscapularis repairs were six complete and four partial thickness supraspinatus/infraspinatus tears. There were no isolated subscapularis tears. Three patients had associated biceps lesions. Subscapularis tears are often associated with supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon tears. Direct anterosuperior viewing and anterior probing enables the surgeon to see and repair ‘hidden’ tears

Objectives. Our principle is to bring the socket back to the true acetabulum position. A large structural bone graft is required for severe subluxation. We obtained good long-term results with structural bone grafts. It is necessary to evaluate the bone graft 3 dimensionally, not 2 dimensionally. M and M. We evaluated our 305 primary THAs operated from April 2010 to Mar 2014. Structural bone grafts were utilized on the acetabulum in 39 cases (12.8%). We measured the CE angle on post-operative plain coronal x-rays. 3D-CT evaluation was carried out on the cases with CE angles of 0 degrees or less. We checked the position of the graft and see how much surface area the graft occupies of the total area that receives the load. Result. Mean CE angle on the post-op plain coronal x-rays was −1.5°. 15 cases (38.5%) had 0 degree or less CE angles on the post-op plain coronal x-rays. 11 cases (−15°≤CE<0°), and 4 cases (−30°≤CE<−15°). Mean CE angle was +3.7° on coronal CT of the apex of the socket. Graft position on the acetabulum on 3D-CT was anterosuperior in 13 cases and posterosuperior in 2 cases, wile none showed wide positioning from anterosuperior to posterior. Conclusion. The contact surface area between the graft and the socket is not necessarily large 3 dimensionally, even if the CE angle is 0 degrees in the plain coronal X-rays. Depending on the graft position, sufficient support is considered to be obtained, even though a large size graft is used

Glenoid failure remains the most common mode of total shoulder arthroplasty failures. Porous tantalum metal (Trabecular Metal™, Zimmer) have grown in popularity in hip and knee arthroplasty. First-generation porous tantalum metal-backed glenoid components demonstrated metal debris, resulted in failure, and were revised to second-generation glenoid implants. Evidence for second-generation porous tantalum metal implants in shoulder arthroplasty is sparse.1–4 The purpose of this study was to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes in a series of patients with second-generation porous tantalum glenoid components at a minimum two-years postoperative. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who received a second-generation porous tantalum glenoid component anatomic shoulder arthroplasty between May 2009 and December 2017 with minimum 24 months follow-up. The shoulder arthroplasties were performed by one of two senior fellowship-trained surgeons. We collected postoperative clinical outcome indicators: EQ5D visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) Index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, and Constant Score (CS). Radiographic review was performed by an independent fellowship-trained surgeon. The Endrizzi metal debris grading system1 was utilized to grade metal debris. We computed descriptive statistics and compared outcome scores between groups via the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test, with group-wise comparisons defined by: metal debris and humeral head migration (secondary analyses). Thirty-five patients [23 male (65.7%) and 12 female (34.3%)] with 40 shoulder replacements participated in the study. Forty of 61 shoulders (65.6%) had an average of 64 ± 20.3 months follow-up (range 31 to 95). Average BMI was 27.5 ± 4.4 kg/m2 (range 19.5 to 39.1). The average postoperative EQ5D VAS at final follow-up was 74.6 ± 22.5, WOOS Index 87.9 ± 16.6, ASES Score 88.3 ± 10.9, and CS 80.4 ± 13. At final follow-up, 18 of 40 shoulders (45%) had metal debris [15 of 40 (37.5%) Endrizzi grade 1 and three of 40 (7.5%) Endrizzi grade 2], and 22 of 40 shoulders (55%) did not show evidence of metal debris. There was one non-revision reoperation (open subscapularis exploration), one shoulder with anterosuperior escape, three shoulders with glenoid radiolucencies indicative of possible glenoid loosening, and nine shoulders with superior migration of the humeral head (>2mm migration at final follow-up compared to immediate postoperative). When comparing postoperative scores between patients with vs without metal debris, we found no statistically significant difference in the EQ5D VAS, WOOS Index, ASES Score and CS. On further analyses, when comparing superior migration of the humeral head and postoperative outcomes scores, we found no statistically significant difference. We report the longest published follow-up with clinical and radiographic outcomes of second-generation porous tantalum glenoid anatomic shoulder arthroplasties. In this series of patients, 45% of total shoulder arthroplasties with a second-generation porous tantalum glenoid implant had radiographic evidence of metal debris. This metal debris was not statistically associated with poorer postoperative outcomes. Further investigation and ongoing follow-up are warranted

Although good to excellent short-term results of arthroscopic partial limbectomy of the hip have been reported, there is little information on the long-term outcome of the procedure. We report a case with a 16-year follow-up. A 34-year old woman presented with a three-month history of severe pain and limitation of movement of the hip. Plain radiographs and arthrography showed no abnormality. MRI showed an effusion and a deformity of the anterosuperior part of the labrum. This was confirmed as an inverted labral tear that was debrided arthroscopically. At 16 years post-operatively, she remained symptom-free. Plain radiographs showed no abnormality and MRI suggested that the sealing effect of the scar tissue prevented articular damage and degeneration