Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of
Introduction.
There is a lack of information about the association between patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) and both adolescent
Open or closed fracture of the tibial shaft is a common injury. There is no long-term outcome data of patients after tibial shaft fracture utilising modern treatment methods. This study assessed pain and function of 1509 consecutive patients with a tibial shaft fracture at 12–22 years following injury. Secondary outcomes included: effect on employment, effect of social deprivation, necessity for hardware removal and comparative morbidity following fasciotomy. Prospective study of 1509 consecutive adult patients with a tibial shaft fracture (1990–1999) at a high-volume trauma unit. 1034 were male, and the mean age at injury was 40 years. Fractures were classified according to AO, and open fractures graded after Gustillo and Anderson. Time to fracture union, complication rate, hardware removal and incidence of
This ongoing prospective RCT compares two surgical approaches with respect to accuracy of guidewire and tibial nail position. 29 patients with tibial fractures were randomised to semi-extended (SE) or standard (S) approaches of tibial nail insertion. Fluoroscopy obtained guidewire and final nail position. The SE approach is more proximal with the guidewire inserted posterior to the patella, theoretically allowing more accurate wire and nail placement. Measurements were taken in both planes of the nail and guidewire to determine deviation from optimum angle of insertion (relative to the long axes of the tibial shaft). 14 and 15 patients were treated with semi-extended and standard approaches respectively. The semi-extended approach results in better guidewire and nail placement in both planes with mean deviation from the optimal angle of insertion as below:. Guidewire AP 4.5° (SE) versus 4.04° (S) Lateral 24.59° (SE) versus 33.36° (S). Nail AP 3.21° (SE) versus 3.68° (S) Lateral 17.73° (SE) versus 24.04° (S).
Background. Computer-assisted navigation systems for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were introduced to improve implantation accuracy and to optimize ligament balancing. Several comparative studies in the literature confirmed an effect on the component position and other studies could not confirm these results. For ligament balancing most studies found no significant influence on the clinical outcome using a navigation system for TKA. In the literature there were no reports of mid-term results after navigated TKA. With our study we wanted to show if the use of a navigation system for TKA will have an influence on the component's position and on the clinical results at 5-year follow up. Methods. We enrolled 200 patients in a prospective randomized study with a minimum follow up of 5 years. 100 TKA were operated on without using a navigation system (Group A) and 100 surgeries (Group B) were done with computer assistance. Radiological investigation by standard radiographs including a long-leg X-ray was performed with a follow up rate in Group A of 86.2% versus 80.2% in Group B. We measured the mechanical axis of the leg, lateral distal femoral angel (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), tibial slope and the alpha-angle of the patella. Clinical investigation was performed with a follow up rate in Group A of 85.7% versus 79.8% in Group B including the parameters for the range of motion (ROM), ligament balancing, anterior drawer test, feeling of instability,
The purpose of this study was to validate the usefulness of SPECT/CT as an evaluation method for determining treatment and prognosis for patellofemoral cartilage lesions, based on MRI and arthroscopic findings. From August 2009 to February 2010, SPECT/CT was performed on 80 patients (24 male and 56 female, average 53.3 years old) with chronic
Introduction. Patellofemoral complications remain a very common post-operative problem in association with total knee arthoplasty (TKA). As malrotation of the femoral component is often considered crucial for the outcome, we analyzed absolute rotational femoral alignment in relation to patellar tracking pre- and postoperatively and matched the results with the two year functional outcome. Methods. Femoral rotation and component rotation was assessed by axial radiography using condylar twist angle (CTA). The lateral patellar displacement, patellar tilt and Insall-Salvati index were measured on conventional radiographs. All assessments were done pre-operatively and at 2-year follow up. The series included 48 consecutive TKA (21 men, 27 women) performed at a single high-volume joint-replacement-center in 2008. All operations were performed using a tibia first-ligament balancing technique without patella resurfacing. The implant used was a condylar unconstrained ultracongruent rotating platform design. Outcome was assessed using the international knee society score (KSS) and the Kujala Score for
Understanding the cause of failure of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) is essential in guiding clinical decision making and adjusting treatment concepts for revision surgery. The purpose of the study was to determine current mechanisms of failure of TKA and to describe changes and trends in revision surgery over the last 10 years. A retrospective review was done on all patients who had revision total knee arthroplasty during a 10-year period (2000–2009) at one institution. The preoperative evaluation in conjunction with the intraoperative findings was used to determine causes of failure. All procedures were categorizes as Sharkey et al. described previously. The data was analyzed regarding the cause of failure and displaying the incidence and trends over the last 10 years. 1225 surgeries were done in the time period with a steady increase of procedures per year (34 procedures in 2000 to 196 in 2009). The most common cause of revision TKA was aseptic failure in 65% and septic failure in 31% of the reviewed cases. However, we could observe a steady proportional increase of the septic classified revisions over the time. Both categories could be subdivided to specific causes of failure including aseptic loosening (24%),