Paediatric supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fracture in children, and is associated with an 11% incidence of neurologic injury. The goal of this study is to investigate the natural history and outcome of motor nerve recovery following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of this injury. A total of 246 children who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning following supracondylar humerus fractures were prospectively enrolled over a two year period. Patient demographics (age, weight), Gartland fracture classification, and associated traumatic neurologic injury were collected and analyzed with descriptive statistics. Patients with neurologic palsies were separated based on nerve injury distribution, and followed long term to monitor for neurologic recovery at set time points for follow up. Of the 246 patient cohort, 46 patients (18.6%) sustained a motor nerve palsy (Group 1) and 200 patients (82.4%) did not (Group 2) following elbow injury. Forty three cases involved one nerve palsy, and three cases involved two nerve palsies. No differences were found between patient age (Group 1 – 6.6 years old, Group 2 – 6.2 years old, p = 0.11) or weight (Group 1 – 24.3kg, Group 2 – 24.5kg, p = 0.44). A significantly higher proportion of Gartland type III and IV injuries were found in those with nerve palsies (Group 1 – 93.5%, Group 2 – 59%, p < 0 .001). Thirty four Anterior Interosseous Nerve (AIN) palsies were observed, of which 22 (64.7%) made a full recovery by three month. Refractory AIN injuries requiring longer than three month recovered on average 6.8 months post injury. Ten Posterior Interosseous Nerve (PIN) palsies occurred, of which four (40%) made full recovery at three month. Refractory PIN injuries requiring longer than three month recovered on average 8.4 months post injury. Six ulnar nerve motor palsies occurred, of which zero (0%) made full recovery at three month. Ulnar nerve injuries recovered on average 5.8 months post injury. Neurologic injury occurs significantly higher in Gartland type III and IV paediatric supracondylar fractures. AIN palsies remain the most common, with an expected 65% chance of full recovery by three month. 40% of all PIN palsies are expected to fully recover by three month. Ulnar motor nerve palsies were slowest to recover at 0% by the three month mark, and had an average recovery time of approximately 5.8 months. Our study findings provide further evidence for setting clinical and parental expectations following neurologic injury in paediatric supracondylar elbow fractures

Between 1994 and 2002, 81 patients underwent ulnohumeral arthroplasty for elbow arthritis at our institution. All patients were sent a questionnaire with a request to attend for a clinical evaluation. Forty replied and 34 attended for clinical examination, 6 females and 34 males with an average age of 63 years (32-80) and a mean follow-up of 6 years (2-10). There were 22 (55%) patients with primary osteoarthritis, 14 (35%) with osteoarthritis secondary to trauma, two patients with rheumatoid arthritis and one patient each with arthrogryphosis multiplex congenital and post-septic arthritis of the elbow. Using the VAS (0-10), the pain score was seen to improve from a mean pre-operative score of 8 (6-10) to 4 (0-9). 21 patients (50%) were on minimal or no analgesia and 31 (75%) patients felt they would have the surgery again for the same problem. The arc of motion as regards flexion/extension was found to increase by 19% while prono-supination was found to increase by 30%. There was one patient each with superficial infection, anterior interosseous nerve neuropathy and myositic ossificans while two patients had triceps rupture. Radiological examination showed that in 12 cases the trephine hole was partially obliterated while in 4 cases it was completely obliterated. This could not be correlated clinically. Patients with loose bodies seemed to do better in the post-operative phase. Ulnohumeral arthroplasty has a role in the management of the arthritic elbow as it provides pain relief in the post-operative period; however, the improvement in the range of movement is limited particularly as regards the arc of extension

Supercharged end-to-side nerve transfer for severe cubital tunnel syndrome is a recently developed technique which involves augmenting the ulnar motor branch with anterior interosseous nerve (AIN). Previous studies suggested that this technique augments or “babysits” the motor end plates until reinnervation occurs, however, some authors suggested possible reinnervation by the donor nerve. We present two cases where this transfer was done for rapid progressive (6–9 months) cubital tunnel syndrome. The first case was a 57 year-old right hand dominant female who presented to us with severe right cubital tunnel syndrome clinically, including intrinsic wasting and claw deformity. The patient had significant loss of function and visible atrophy to her hand intrinsics over the last few months. Electrodiagnostic studies confirmed the diagnosis of severe cubital tunnel syndrome demonstrating axonal loss, positive sharp waves and fibrillations in the ulnar nerve distribution distally. The patient underwent cubital tunnel ulnar nerve release, subcutaneous anterior transposition, Guyon's canal release along with an AIN to ulnar motor nerve end-to-side transfer. Patient-based functional outcome instruments were prospectively collected with improved overall pain and function as demonstrated from a quickDASH score of 9.1 1 year post-op in comparison to a score of 34.1 pre-op. Recovery was monitored clinically and electrodiagnostic studies at 6 months and 1 year post-operatively. She demonstrated improved intrinsic muscle bulk and strength. The nerve studies at one year showed reinnervation with large amplitude motor unit potentials in the 1st dorsal interosseous and abductor digiti minimi but the 5th finger sensory response remained absent. The second case was a 58 year-old right hand dominant male diagnosed with severe and progressive right cubital tunnel syndrome. Clinically, he had significant muscle wasting and weakness and confirmed denervation on electrodiagnostic studies. He underwent the same surgical procedure as described for the first case and follow-up regimen. The patient demonstrated improved pain score and significant overall function recovery with a quickDASH score of 11.4 one year post-op in comparison to 72.7 pre-op. Nerve studies at one year confirmed our clinical impression, showing ulnar nerve reinnervation with large amplitude motor unit potentials in the 1st dorsal interosseous, while sensory response remained absent. It is yet unclear if end-to-side nerve transfers allow reinnervation of the target muscles. Previous studies have demonstrated clinical improvement with this transfer, however we are unaware of any electrodiagnostic studies demonstrating this effect. These two cases support the notion of reinnervation after an end-to-side procedure. Further studies are needed to assess outcomes of such nerve transfers