Arthritis is a common and debilitating disease and is associated with an increased fall risk. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of impacted joint and limb on fall risk as measured by the margin of stability (MOS). There were 110 participants, including healthy controls (HC; n=30), ankle arthritis (AA; n=30), knee arthritis (KA; n=20) and hip arthritis (HA; n=30) patients. All protocols were Institutional Review Board approved and all participants signed informed consent. Participants walked approximately 6 meters at a self-selected pace. MOS was calculated in the foot coordinate system in the anterior/posterior (AP) and medial/lateral (ML) directions at heel strike. A one-way ANOVA was used to examine group effects (HC, AA, KA, HA) on gait speed. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to examine the effects of limb (Non-Surgical, Surgical) and group on AP and ML MOS. HC had the fastest gait speed (1.40±0.24 m/s; p<0.001) when compared to AA (0.85±0.24 m/s), KA (0.94±0.22 m/s) and HA (1.05±0.22 m/s). HA participants had a greater gait speed compared to AA (p=0.004). AP MOS was greater in the surgical limb compared to the non-surgical limb for AA (p<0.001) and HA (p<0.001). AP MOS was smaller in HC compared to AA, KA, and HA, regardless of limb (p<0.030). AP MOS was similar between AA, KA, and HA for the non-surgical limb (p>0.194) and the surgical limb (p>0.096). ML MOS was greater in the surgical compared to non-surgical limb (p=0.003). ML MOS was smaller in KA participants compared to all other groups (p<0.001). Our results demonstrate stability during gait varies between limbs in arthritis patients, with a more conservative pattern for the surgical limb and suggest KA may be at an increased risk of falls with a smaller ML MOS

Management of ankle arthritis in young patients is challenging. Although ankle arthrodesis gives consistent pain relief, it leads to loss of function and adjacent joint arthritis. Ankle joint distraction (AJD) has been shown to give good outcomes in adults with osteoarthritis or post-traumatic arthritis. The efficacy in children or young adults and those with juvenile idiopathic arthritis is less well evidenced. Clinical notes and radiographs of all patients (n=6) managed with AJD in one tertiary referral centre were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographs were taken pre-surgery, intra-operatively, 1 month following frame removal and at the last follow up, tibiotalar joint space was assessed using ImageJ software. Measurements were taken at the medial, middle and lateral talar dome using frame components as reference. Radiographic data for patients with a good clinical outcome was compared with those who did not. At time of surgery mean age was 16.1 years (12 – 25 years). Mean follow up was 3.4 years (1.5 – 5.9 years). Indications were juvenile idiopathic arthritis (4) post-traumatic (1) and post-infective arthritis (1). Three patients at last follow up had a good clinical outcome. Two patients required revision to arthrodesis (1.3 and 2.4 years following distraction). One patient had spontaneous fusion. One patient required oral antibiotics for pin site infection. Inter-observer reliability was 95%. Mean joint space was 1.17mm (SD = 0.87mm) pre-operatively which increased to 6.72mm (SD = 2.23mm) at the time of distraction and 2.09mm (SD = 1.14mm) at the time of removal. At one-year follow up, mean joint space was 1.96mm (SD = 1.97mm). Outcomes following AJD in this population are variable although significant benefits were demonstrated for 50% of the patients in this series. Radiographic joint space preoperatively did not appear to be associated with need for arthrodesis. Further research in larger groups of young patients is required

Abstract. Introduction. Ankle arthritis is estimated to affect approximately 72 million people worldwide. Treatment options include fusion and total ankle replacement (TAR). Clinical performance of TAR is not as successful as other joint replacement and failure is poorly understood. Finite element analysis offers a method to assess the strain in bone implanted with a TAR. Higher strain has been associated with microfracture and alters the bone-implant interface. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of implant fixation on strain within the tibia when implanted with a TAR through subject-specific models. Methods. Five cadaveric ankles were scanned using a Scanco Xtreme CT. The Tibia and Talus were segmented from each scan and virtually implanted with a Zenith TAR (Corin, UK) according to published surgical technique. Patient specific models were created and run at five different positions of the gait cycle corresponding to peak load and flexion values identified from literature. Bone material properties were derived from CT greyscale values and all parts were meshed with linear tetrahedral elements. The implant-bone interface was adjusted to fully-fixed or frictionless contact, representing different levels of fixation post-surgery. Strain distributions around the tibial bone fixation were measured. Results. Initial results showed clear differences in strain distributions both between different ankle specimens and fixation levels, with highest strain occurring within the bone at the tip of the tibial stem. Frictionless contact gave higher strain outputs than fully-fixed for all specimens with a range 0.12–0.3% and 0.07%–0.13% respectively. Conclusions. In all specimens, strain was higher in the frictionless contact, which may be considered representative of no bony ingrowth, highlighting fixation may be a critical factor in TAR failure. Differences observed between specimens highlights that TAR may not be a suitable intervention for all patients, due to variation in bone quality and anatomy. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Objectives. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature and conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of open versus arthroscopic methods of ankle fusion. Methods. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards, we performed a systematic review. Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to identify randomised and non-randomised studies comparing outcomes of arthroscopic and open ankle arthrodesis. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of the selected studies. Fixed-effect or random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results. We identified one prospective cohort study and 5 retrospective cohort studies, enrolling a total of 286 patients with ankle arthritis. Our analysis showed that open ankle fusion was associated with a lower fusion rate (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13–0.52, P = 0.0002), longer tourniquet time (MD 16.49, 95% CI 9.46–23.41, P<0.00001), and longer length of stay (MD 1.60,95% CI 1.10–2.10, P<0.00001) compared to arthroscopic ankle fusion; however, there was no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate (OR 2.41, 95% CI 0.76–7.64, P = 0.14), overall complication rate (OR: 1.54, 95% CI 0.80–2.96, P = 0.20), and operation time (MD 4.09, 95% CI −2.49–10.66, P = 0.22). The between-study heterogeneity was high for tourniquet time but low or moderate for other outcomes. The direction of the effect sizes remains unchanged throughout sensitivity analyses. Conclusions. The best available evidence demonstrates that arthroscopic ankle fusion may be associated with a higher fusion rate, shorter tourniquet time, and shorter length of stay compared to open ankle fusion. We found no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate, overall complication rate, and operation time. The best available evidence is not adequately robust to make definitive conclusions. Long-term results of the comparative efficacy of arthroscopic ankle fusion over open ankle fusion are not currently available. Further high quality randomised controlled trials that are adequately powered are required

Objectives. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature and conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of open versus arthroscopic methods of ankle fusion. Methods. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards, we performed a systematic review. Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to identify randomised and non-randomised studies comparing outcomes of arthroscopic and open ankle arthrodesis. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of the selected studies. Fixed-effect or random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results. We identified one prospective cohort study and 5 retrospective cohort studies, enrolling a total of 286 patients with ankle arthritis. Our analysis showed that open ankle fusion was associated with a lower fusion rate (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13–0.52, P = 0.0002), longer tourniquet time (MD 16.49, 95% CI 9.46–23.41, P<0.00001), and longer length of stay (MD 1.60,95% CI 1.10–2.10, P<0.00001) compared to arthroscopic ankle fusion; however, there was no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate (OR 2.41, 95% CI 0.76–7.64, P = 0.14), overall complication rate (OR: 1.54, 95% CI 0.80–2.96, P = 0.20), and operation time (MD 4.09, 95% CI −2.49–10.66, P = 0.22). The between-study heterogeneity was high for tourniquet time but low or moderate for other outcomes. The direction of the effect sizes remains unchanged throughout sensitivity analyses. Conclusions. The best available evidence demonstrates that arthroscopic ankle fusion may be associated with a higher fusion rate, shorter tourniquet time, and shorter length of stay compared to open ankle fusion. We found no significant difference between two groups in terms of infection rate, overall complication rate, and operation time. The best available evidence is not adequately robust to make definitive conclusions. Long-term results of the comparative efficacy of arthroscopic ankle fusion over open ankle fusion are not currently available. Further high quality randomised controlled trials that are adequately powered are required

Objectives

To review the systemic impact of smoking on bone healing as evidenced within the orthopaedic literature.

A cavovarus foot deformity was simulated in cadaver specimens by inserting metallic wedges of 15° and 30° dorsally into the first tarsometatarsal joint. Sensors in the ankle joint recorded static tibiotalar pressure distribution at physiological load.

The peak pressure increased significantly from neutral alignment to the 30° cavus deformity, and the centre of force migrated medially. The anterior migration of the centre of force was significant for both the 15° (repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), p = 0.021) and the 30° (repeated measures ANOVA, p = 0.007) cavus deformity. Differences in ligament laxity did not influence the peak pressure.

These findings support the hypothesis that the cavovarus foot deformity causes an increase in anteromedial ankle joint pressure leading to anteromedial arthrosis in the long term, even in the absence of lateral hindfoot instability.