An intra-articular steroid injection can be a useful diagnostic tool in patients presenting with debilitating hip pain and radiographically mild osteoarthritis. The clinical and patient reported outcomes associated with patients who have radiographically mild osteoarthritis and undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain poorly studied. Patients undergoing primary, elective THA at a single academic medical center by a fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeon between 2017–2023 were identified. Only those patients who underwent an intra-articular corticosteroid injection into the operative hip within one year of surgery were included. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the severity of their osteoarthritis as determined by preoperative radiographs; those with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade I-II arthritis were classified as “mild” whereas those with KL grade III-IV arthritis were classified as “severe”. Clinical and patient reported outcomes at final follow-up were compared between cohorts. The final cohorts included 25 and 224 patients with radiographically mild and severe osteoarthritis, respectively. There were no baseline differences in age, gender or time between intra-articular corticosteroid injection and THA between cohorts. There were no significant differences in the preoperative or postoperative HOOS JR values between patients with mild or severe arthritis (all p>0.05). There were no significant differences in the change in HOOS JR scores from the preoperative to final follow-up timepoints between cohorts. There were no significant differences in the percentage of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the HOOS JR questionnaire between cohorts. Patients with radiographically mild osteoarthritis who feel relief of their hip pain following an intra-articular corticosteroid injection report similar preoperative debility and demonstrate similar improvements in patient reported outcome scores following THA compared to patients with radiographically severe osteoarthritis

Aims. Studying the indications for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) may enable surgeons to change their practice during the initial procedure, thereby reducing the need for revision surgery. The aim of this study was to identify and describe the potentially avoidable indications for revision THA within five years of the initial procedure. Patients and Methods. A retrospective review of 117 patients (73 women, 44 men; mean age 61.5 years (27 to 88)) who met the inclusion criteria was conducted. Three adult reconstruction surgeons independently reviewed the radiographs and medical records, and they classified the revision THAs into two categories: potentially avoidable and unavoidable. Baseline demographics, perioperative details, and quality outcomes up to the last follow-up were recorded. Results. A total of 60 revision THAs (51.3%) were deemed potentially avoidable and 57 (48.7%) were deemed unavoidable. The following were identified as avoidable factors: suboptimal positioning of the acetabular component (29; 48%), intraoperative fracture or a fracture missed on an intraoperative radiograph (20; 33%), early (less than two weeks) aseptic loosening (seven; 11.7%), and symptomatic leg length discrepancy of > 1 cm (four; 6.7%). Conclusion. A surprisingly large proportion of acute revision THAs are potentially avoidable. Surgeons must carefully evaluate the indications for revision THAs in their practice and identify new methods to address these issues. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):97–103

Introduction. Complications can be defined as preventable, potentially preventable, or non-preventable. While often discussed, there are virtually no data whether or not the most common causes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) are preventable or not. The goal of this study was to identify and report preventable causes of revision THA within 5 years of the index THA. Methods. We conducted a retrospective review of 128 consecutive revision THAs between August 2015 and August 2017, with 62% being referred from another institution. Mean time to revision THA from the index arthroplasty was 10 months. Mean age at revision THA was 61 years, with 67% being female. Three fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeons reviewed the radiographs and operative notes and classified the revision THAs into two categories: preventable vs. non-preventable. Reviewers were instructed to be extremely lenient with the benefit of the doubt given to the operative surgeon. Inter-observer reliability was assessed by Cohen's kappa analysis. Results. A large proportion of revision THAs were considered preventable (60 cases; 47%). Of the 60 revision THAs considered preventable, the following were identified as the reasons: recurrent instability from component malpositioning (48%), intraoperative fracture (from inadequate exposure, incorrect stem choice, or a fracture missed on an intraoperative x-ray; 33%), early (<2 weeks) aseptic loosening of acetabular components placed without screws (7%), symptomatic leg length discrepancy of >1cm (7%), and femoral component subsidence due to stem under-sizing (5%). Inter-observer reliability was perfect among the three reviewers with a kappa of 1.00. Conclusion: An alarmingly large proportion (47%) of revision THAs are preventable. Furthermore, surgeons are responsible for carefully evaluating causes for revision THAs in their practice and identifying new methods to address these issues. Emphasis should be placed on careful preoperative templating and accurate intraoperative execution. Summary. An alarmingly large proportion (47%) of revision THA is potentially preventable. Surgeons are responsible for carefully evaluating causes for revision THA in their own practice

Aims

Although CT is considered the benchmark to measure femoral version, 3D biplanar radiography (hipEOS) has recently emerged as a possible alternative with reduced exposure to ionizing radiation and shorter examination time. The aim of our study was to evaluate femoral stem version in postoperative total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients and compare the accuracy of hipEOS to CT. We hypothesize that there will be no significant difference in calculated femoral stem version measurements between the two imaging methods.

Aims

Achieving accurate implant positioning and restoring native hip biomechanics are key surgeon-controlled technical objectives in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary objective of this study was to compare the reproducibility of the planned preoperative centre of hip rotation (COR) in patients undergoing robotic arm-assisted THA versus conventional THA.

Aims

Navigation devices are designed to improve a surgeon’s accuracy in positioning the acetabular and femoral components in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to both evaluate the accuracy of an optical computer-assisted surgery (CAS) navigation system and determine whether preoperative spinopelvic mobility (categorized as hypermobile, normal, or stiff) increased the risk of acetabular component placement error.

Aims

Use of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased in recent years due to proposed benefits, including a lower risk of dislocation and improved early functional recovery. This study investigates the dislocation rate in a non-selective, consecutive cohort undergoing THA via the DAA without any exclusion or bias in patient selection based on habitus, deformity, age, sex, or fixation method.

Aims

To achieve the functional benefits of the direct anterior (DA) approach and the fixation benefits of cemented replacement, this study combined the two techniques posing the following questions: does the limited access of the DA approach adversely affect the cement technique?; and does such a cementing technique reduce the incidence of cementless complications?

Aims

Advances in surgical technique and implant design may influence the incidence and mechanism of failure resulting in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The purpose of the current study was to characterize aetiologies requiring rTHA, and to determine whether temporal changes existed in these aetiologies over a ten-year period.

Aims

It may not be possible to undertake revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the presence of massive loss of acetabular bone stock using standard cementless hemispherical acetabular components and metal augments, as satisfactory stability cannot always be achieved. We aimed to study the outcome using a reconstruction cage and a porous metal augment in these patients.

Direct anterior approaches to the hip have gained popularity as a minimally invasive method when performing primary total hip replacement (THR). A retrospective review of a single institution joint registry was performed in order to compare patient outcomes after THR using the Anterior Supine Intermuscular (ASI) approach versus a more conventional direct lateral approach. An electronic database identified 1511 patients treated with 1690 primary THRs between January 2006 and December 2010. Our results represent a summary of findings from our previously published work. We found that patients that underwent an ASI approach had faster functional recovery and higher Harris hip scores in the early post-operative period when compared with patients who had a direct lateral approach The overall complication rate in our ASI group was relatively low (1.7%) compared with other series using the same approach. The most frequent complication was early periprosthetic femoral fractures (0.9%). The dislocation rate in our series was 0.4% and the prosthetic joint infection rate was 0.1%. We suggest that the ASI approach is acceptable and safe when performing THR and encourages early functional recovery of our patients.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96- B(11 Suppl A):32–5.

We report the use of an allograft prosthetic composite for reconstruction of the skeletal defect in complex revision total hip replacement for severe proximal femoral bone loss. Between 1986 and 1999, 72 patients (20 men, 52 women) with a mean age of 59.9 years (38 to 78) underwent reconstruction using this technique.

At a mean follow-up of 12 years (8 to 20) 57 patients were alive, 14 had died and one was lost to follow-up. Further revision was performed in 19 hips at a mean of 44.5 months (11 to 153) post-operatively. Causes of failure were aseptic loosening in four, allograft resorption in three, allograft nonunion in two, allograft fracture in four, fracture of the stem in one, and deep infection in five. The survivorship of the allograft-prosthesis composite at ten years was 69.0% (95% confidence interval 67.7 to 70.3) with 26 patients remaining at risk. Survivorship was statistically significantly affected by the severity of the pre-operative bone loss (Paprosky type IV; p = 0.019), the number of previous hip revisions exceeding two (p = 0.047), and the length of the allograft used (p = 0.005).