Introduction. Acetabular bone deficiency presents one of the most challenging problems during revision hip arthroplasty. A variety of surgical options and techniques are available including impaction bone grafting. We present our medium to long-term experience of 68 consecutive hips in 64 patients who had acetabular revision using impacted cancellous bone grafting with bone cement with a mean follow up of 10.5 ±3.75) years (range 5.1 to 17.7 years). Methods. Patients' undergoing acetabular bone grafting during revision hip arthroplasty prior to insertion of a cemented cup between 1993 and 2000 were evaluated. Pre-operative, immediate post-operative, 1 year post-op and final follow-up radiographs were evaluated. The pre-operative bone loss was graded according to the AAOS and Paprosky classifications. The presence of radiolucencies, alignment and incorporation of bone graft were evaluated. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used to assess clinical outcome. 13 patients who were unable to attend the department were contacted for a telephone interview. Analysis of the Data was carried out using SPSS17 [SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois]. Results. 64 consecutive patients (68 hips) were evaluated with an average age of 69.9 (± 10.24) years. At the mean follow up of 10.5 years [5.1–17.7 years] Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis predicted a rate of survival of the acetabular component of 95.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 92 to 99) at 10 years, with revision for any reason as the endpoint. The median Harris hip score at final follow up was 79.5 [IQR 67.9–80.45]. Neither the extent of initial defect or acetabular inclination were related to clinical outcome or predicted further revision. Progression of the radiololucent zones between the cement bone interface was a predictor of loosening and further revision. Discussion. Our findings have shown that acetabular revision using impacted cancellous bone graft and a cemented acetabular component remains a reliable and successful technique for patients with poor femoral bone stock

Introduction. The Kaplan Meier estimator is widely used in orthopedics. In situations where another event prevents the occurrence of the event of interest, the Kaplan Meier estimator is not appropriate and a competing risks model has to be applied. We questioned how much bias is introduced by erroneous use of the Kaplan Meier estimator instead of a competing risks model in a hip revision surgery cohort. Methods. In our previously published cohort study, 62 acetabular revisions (58 patients) were performed between January 1979 and March 1986. Twenty to twenty-five years after surgery, no patients were lost to follow-up. Thirteen patients underwent revision surgery. During the 20 to 25 years follow-up, 30 patients (33 acetabular revisions) died of causes unrelated to their hip surgery. Results. In the data set analyzed, the Kaplan Meier method overestimates the probability of implant failure by 6.7%, 13.8%,26.8%,48.6% at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years respectively. Discussion. We have performed two different analyses for a hip revision surgery cohort and discussed the use of a competing risks model. Ignoring competing risks leads to biased estimations of the probability of having future revision surgery. Therefore we recommended the use of a competing risks model whenever there are competing risks present

Between July 2000 and December 2002, 263 consecutive patients across 5 surgical centers underwent to a revision surgery of a failed acetabular component in which TM acetabular components were used. There were 150 women and 113 men with a mean age of 69.5 years. The indication for acetabular revision was aseptic loosening in 186 cases (70.7%). Clinical evaluations were performed using the Harris hip score, the WOMAC and UCLA activity scale. Implant and screw position, polyethylene wear, radiolucent lines, gaps, and osteolysis were assessed. Preoperatively, acetabular bone deficiency was categorized using the classification of Paprosky et al. Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric correlations. Standard life table was constructed, and the survival rate was calculated by means of Kaplan-Meier method. The overall mean follow-up was 73.6 months (range, 60–84 months), and no patient was lost to follow-up. The preoperative HHS rating improved from a mean of 43.6 ± 11.4 before revision, to a mean of 82.1 ± 10.7. None of the patients was re-revised for loosening. The cumulative prosthesis survival was 99.2% at 5 years. There was no correlation found between the various degrees of acetabular bony defect and the magnitude of clinical results (independent of pre-revision Paprosky grade). The use of component augments allowed us to minimize the volume of morsellized allograft used for defect repair. TM acetabular component demonstrates promising midterm results similar to those reported by other authors

Introduction. Primary stability of the Burch-Schneider ring (BSR) in case of acetabular revision is discussed controversial. In a retrospective two centre cohort study we analyzed the influence of the mode of screw fixation and the restoration of the center of rotation on migration, loosening and other radiographic parameters. Material/Methods. Patients with a minimal radiographical follow-up of 2 years and suitable for EBRA analysis were included. In group 1 (46 patients) screws were placed through the cranial spherical part of the ring and covered by cement and cup, in group 2 (40 patients) screws were placed through the cranial flange. Preoperative bone defects were classified, the postoperative centre of rotation was determined. Changes of screws were recorded, migration exceeding >1mm was seen as significant. Results. Demographic data and size of bone defect were comparable in both groups. No cups in group 1 and in group 2 were re-revised. In group 1 the centre of rotation was medialized mean 5.5 (SD 8.2) mm, in group 2 it was lateralised mean 11.0 (SD 10.3) mm (p<.001). Screw changes were observed in 5 (10.9%) patients in group 1 and 14 (35%) patients in group 2 (p=.009). Migration at 2 years was observed for 17 (37%) patients in group 1, mean migration was 1.0 (SD 1.0) mm. In group 2 21 (52.5%) patients showed migration at 2 years (p=.193), mean migration was 1.6 (SD 1.7) mm (p=.031). Conclusion. Medialization of the implant and screw fixation with compression of the ring against the acetabular roof reduces migration and screw changes. The improved stability might be due to better osteointegration of the BSR and angular stability of the screws which are additionally fixed with cement

Hip resurfacing has grown rapidly since its introduction in the United States, as an alternative to total hip replacement in the younger, active patient. Some studies have suggested a steep learning curve and a higher complication rate when compared to THR. Existing studies have originated from the pioneering surgeons, using a specific type of resurfacing implant. The purpose of this study was to look at the experience of a single, non-inventor surgeon with the adoption of hip resurfacing, using 3 different implants. M&M. All consecutive hip resurfacings performed by the senior surgeon between 2004 and 2008 were included, providing a minimum 2 year followup period. 3 different implant types were used; 2 of these were used as part of the clinical trials, and 1 was used after US FDA approval. A total of 560 hip resurfacings were eligible for the study based upon a minimum of 2 year followup. Results. Nine revisions were performed in this cohort (1.6%). 2 were femoral conversions to endoprostheses for femoral neck fracture; 3 additional femoral conversions were done for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. 1 acetabular revision only was performed for malposition. 2 revisions to THR of both the acetabular and femoral components were done for acetabular loosening and excessive metal production (edge loading). There was 1 revision for metal hypersensitivity. Overall, the K-M survival curve is 98.1% at 4 years. There was no difference with regard to survival from additional surgery with regard to the different implant types. Radiographic signs of failure were also documented. In this cohort, 3 femoral and 1 acetabular components were identified to be radiographically loose, giving a K-M survival from clinical and radiographic failure to be 96.8% at 4 years. Discussion. Hip resurfacing can be adopted successfully with a low rate of reoperation, by the use of careful patient selection. A single surgeon's experience with 3 different types of implants demonstrated no difference in clinical results between the devices

Aims

Displaced, comminuted acetabular fractures in the elderly are increasingly common, but there is no consensus on whether they should be treated non-surgically, surgically with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), or with acute total hip arthroplasty (THA). A combination of ORIF and acute THA, an approach called ’combined hip procedure’ (CHP), has been advocated and our aim was to compare the outcome after CHP or ORIF alone.