The aim of this study was to characterise noise associated with ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty (THA). A questionnaire was constructed to assess noise associated with THA. 116 patients responded. All had ceramic-on-ceramic hybrid THA at Glasgow Royal Infirmary between 2005 and 2007 using a Trident prosthesis and Exeter stem. Oxford Hip Questionnaires (OHS) were also completed by the patients. 16.4% of respondents reported noise associated with their ceramic hip. The vast majority reported onset at least 1 year after implantation. The most common noise types were ‘clicking’ (47%) or ‘grinding’ (42%), while ‘squeaking’ was least frequently reported (11%). Noise was most commonly brought on by bending and during sit to stand movements. No correlation was identified between the incidence of noise and any patient specific factor or demographic variable. The mean OHS at questionnaire follow-up was 39 and there was no significant difference in OHS when comparing noisy and silent hips (p=0.65). Only 1 patient limited social or recreational activities and overall patients felt the noise had minimal effect on their quality of life. Acetabular component inclination angles were compared on post-operative x-rays. There was no significant difference (p=0.51) in inclination angles of the noisy (47.1°±6.3°, range 30–57°) and silent hips (47.8°±6.1°, range 35–68°). The groups were further analysed for deviation out with the desirable inclination range of 40–45°. Of the noisy hips, a total of 73% were out with this range compared to 63% in the silent hip group. The incidence of noise within this ceramic-on-ceramic THA group did not appear to be related to patient specific factors, patient reported outcome (OHS) or acetabular inclination angles. Subjective appraisal of the noise revealed that ‘squeaking’ was not common but patients tended to report ‘clicking’ and ‘grinding’ more. The precipitation of noise with bending activities reinforces a possible mechanical cause

Background. The position of the hip-joint centre of rotation (HJC) within the pelvis is known to influence functional outcome of total hip replacement (THR). Superior, lateral and posterior relocations of the HJC from anatomical position have been shown to be associated with greater joint reaction forces and a higher incidence of aseptic loosening. In biomechanical models, the maximum force, moment-generating capacity and the range of motion of the major hip muscle groups have been shown to be sensitive to HJC displacement. This clinical study investigated the effect of HJC displacement and acetabular cup inclination angle on functional performance in patients undergoing primary THR. Methods. Retrospective study of primary THR patients at the RNOH. HJC displacement from anatomical position in horizontal and vertical planes was measured relative to radiological landmarks using post-operative, calibrated, anterior-posterior pelvic radiographs. Acetabular cup inclination angle was measured relative to the inter-teardrop line. Maximum range of passive hip flexion, abduction, adduction, external and internal rotation were measured in clinic. Patient reported functional outcome was assessed by Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and WOMAC questionnaires. Data analysed using a linear regression model. Results. 109 THRs were studied in 104 patients (69 Female). Mean age at THR=63 years (22-88). Mean follow-up=17 months (11-39 months). Median OHS=16, WOMAC=8. Increasing vertical HJC displacement (in either superior or inferior direction) from anatomical position was associated with worsening OHS (p<0.05) and WOMAC scores (p<0.05) and a reduced range of passive hip flexion (p<0.05). No relationship was found between either horizontal HJC displacement or acetabular cup inclination angle and patient functional outcome. Conclusion. A significant relationship was identified between increasing vertical displacement of the HJC and worsening patient functional outcome. This supports current opinion regarding the disadvantageous consequences of a superiorly displaced HJC in terms of survivorship and function. We therefore advocate an anatomical restoration of HJC position wherever possible

The link between squeaking and ceramic on ceramic (CoC) bearings has been widely reported in orthopaedic literature and is described as a hard bearing phenomenon. We aim to look at the incidence of noise in CoC bearings compared to Metal on Polyethylene (MoP) bearing, which have yet to be linked to squeaking. We developed a noise characterizing hip questionnaire and sent that along with the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) to 1000 patients; 3:2 ratio of CoC to MoP. 282 CoC patients and 227 MoP patients returned the questions: 509 patients in total. Our patient database provided details on femoral head size and the acetabular inclination angle, for each respondent. 47 (17%) of the CoC hip patients reported noise compared to 19 (8%) of the MoP hip patients (P=0.054). 9 CoC patients and 4 MoP patients reported squeaking, while clicking was the most frequent answer in both groups. 27% patients with noise reported avoiding recreational activities because of it. Patient's with noisy hips scored on average, 5 points worse in the OHS (CoC: P = 0.04 and MoP: P = 0.007) and were on average 5 years younger (CoC: P<0.001 and MoP: P=0.007). No correlation was found between noisy hips and femoral head size or inclination angle. The squeaking hip phenomenon is not exclusive to hard bearing THA. Noise from patient's hips may have social implications and this should be highlighted when consenting a patient for either of these hip procedures. In both implants, we showed there to be a correlation between noise production and a lower OHS. However, longer follow up studies are needed to link noise to a poorly functioning implant

In order to evaluate the relationship between acetabular and proximal femoral alignment in the initiation and evolution of osteoarthritis of the dysplastic hip, the acetabular and femoral angles were calculated geometrically from radiographs of 62 patients with pre-arthrosis and early osteoarthritis. The sum of the lateral opening angle of the acetabulum and the neck-shaft angle was defined as the lateral instability index (LII), and the sum of the anterior opening angle of the acetabulum and the anteversion angle of the femoral neck as the anterior instability index (AII). These two indices were compared in dysplastic and unaffected hips. A total of 22 unilateral hips with pre-arthrosis were followed for at least 15 years to determine whether the two indices were associated with the progression of osteoarthritis.

The LII of the affected hips (197.4 (sd 6.0)) was significantly greater than that of the unaffected hips (1830 (sd 6.9)). A follow-up study of 22 hips with pre-arthrosis showed that only the LII was associated with progression of the disease, and an LII of 196 was the threshold value for this progression.