Introduction. Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) often results in femoral head deformity and leg length discrepancy (LLD). Objective of this study was to analyse femoral morphology in LCPD patients at skeletal maturity to assess where the LLD originates, and evaluate the effect of contralateral epiphysiodesis for length equalisation on proximal and subtrochanteric femoral lengths. Materials and Methods. All patients treated for LCPD in our institution between January 2013 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with unilateral LCPD, LLD of ≥5mm and long leg standing radiographs at skeletal maturity were included. Total leg length, femoral and tibial length, articulotrochanteric distance (ATD) and subtrochanteric femoral length were compared between LCPD side and unaffected side. Furthermore, we compared leg length measurements between patients who did and who did not have a contralateral epiphysiodesis. Results. 79 patients were included, 21/79 underwent contralateral epiphysiodesis for leg length correction. In the complete cohort the average LLD was 1.8cm (95% CI 1.5 – 2.0), average ATD difference was 1.8cm (95% CI −2.1 – −1.9) and average subtrochanteric difference was −0.2cm (95% CI −0.4 – 0.1). In the epiphysiodesis group the average LLD before epiphysiodesis was 2.7 (1.3 – 3.4) cm and 1.3 (−0.5 – 3.8) cm at skeletal maturity. In the non-epiphysiodesis group the average LLD was 2.0 (0.5 – 5.1), p=0.016. The subtrochanteric region on the LCPD side was significantly longer at skeletal maturity in the epiphysiodesis group compared to the non-epiphysiodesis group: −1.0 (−2.4 – 0.6) versus 0.1 (−1.0 – 2.1), p<0.001. Conclusions. This study concludes that LLD after LCPD originates from the proximal segment only. In patients who had had a contralateral epiphysiodesis, the subtrochanteric femoral region was significantly longer on the LCPD side. These anatomical changes need to be considered by paediatric surgeons when advising leg length equalisation procedures, and by arthroplasty surgeons when LCPD patients present for hip arthroplasty

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is traditionally treated with in situ fixation using a threaded screw, leading to physeal arrest while stabilizing the femoral head. Recently, there has been interest in alternative methods of fixation for SCFE, aiming to allow growth and remodelling of the femoral neck postoperatively. One such option is the Free Gliding SCFE Screw (Pega Medical), which employs a telescopic design intended to avoid physeal compression. The objective of this study is to evaluate radiographic changes of the proximal femur following in situ fixation using the Free Gliding SCFE Screw. This study retrospectively evaluated 28 hips in 14 consecutive patients who underwent in situ hip fixation using the Free Gliding SCFE Screw between 2014 and 2018. Initial postoperative radiographs were compared to last available follow-up imaging. Radiographic assessment included screw length, articulotrochanteric distance (ATD), posterior sloping angle (PSA), alpha angle, head-neck offset (HNO) and head-shaft angle (HSA). Of the 28 hips reviewed, 17 were treated for SCFE and an additional 11 treated prophylactically. Average age at surgery was 11.7 years, with an average follow-up of 1.44 years. Screw length increased by 2.3 mm (p < 0.001). ATD decreased from 25.4 to 22.2 mm (p < 0.001). Alpha angle decreased from 68.7 to 59.8 degrees (p = 0.004). There was a trend towards an increase in HNO (p = 0.07). There was no significant change in PSA or HAS. There were three complications (two patients with retained broken guide wires, and one patient requiring screw removal for hip pain). With use of the Free Gliding SCFE Screw, there was evidence of screw expansion and femoral neck remodelling with short-term follow-up. More research is required to determine the long-term impact of these changes on hip function, and to aid in patient selection for this technology

Sixty-two children with unilateral Perthes disease who underwent trochanteric epiphyseodesis combined with varus osteotomy of the femur during the active stage of the disease, (mean age at surgery: 8.4 years) and twenty controls were followed up untill skeletal maturity. The following measurements were taken on radiographs taken at skeletal maturity: the articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD), the center-trochanteric distance (CTD), the length of the abductor lever arm, the neck-shaft angle, the radius of the femoral head and the Reimer's migration index of normal and affected hips. The shape of the femoral head was assessed according to the criteria of Mose. The range of hip motion, the strength of hip abduction and limb lengths were measured and the Trendelenburg sign was elicited. The mean values of ATD and CTD were greater and the frequency of a positive Trendelenburg sign was less in children who had undergone trochanteric epiphyseodesis in 60% of operated children. The procedure was not effective in 30% and there was over-correction in in 10% of children. Logistic regression analysis showed that the size of the femoral head and the age at surgery were variables that significantly influenced the effectiveness of trochanteric growth arrest. At skeletal maturity, the mean shortening of the affected limb in operated children was 0.44 cm (SD 0.68 cm), while that of non-operated children was 0.86 cm (SD 0.78 cm) (p: 0.023). The range of motion of the hip was excellent and there were no significant differences in the range of motion between children with optimal correction, under-correction and over-correction. A probability curve plotted on the basis of the of a logistic regression model suggests that effective trochanteric arrest may be achieved in a high proportion of children operated at, or before, 8.5 years of age, and in half the children operated between the age of 8.5 years and 10 years

Introduction. Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in the treatment of slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) has been shown to be safer than continued observation of the contralateral hip. This treatment remains controversial due to the potential for harm caused to an apparently unaffected hip. There is evidence that pinning of an already slipped epiphysis causes growth disturbance of the proximal femur, however this has been questioned in that the slip occurs at the hypertrophic layer of the growth plate with no damage to the germative layer. Aim. To determine whether prophylactic pinning affects subsequent growth of the unaffected hip in cases of unilateral SUFE. Method. In order to determine the effect of prophylactic pinning we compared radiographs of skeletally mature patients who had either undergone prophylactic pinning (group 1), pinning of the affected side only (group 2), and adults with no history of SUFE (group 3). We measured the articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD) and calculated the ratio of the trochanteric-trochanteric distance to articulo-trochanteric distance. These measures have been used in previous studies and have been shown to be reliable indicators of disturbed proximal femoral growth. As this was a pilot study we recruited 8 to each group. Results. The absolute sum of the ATDs were 219mm (average 27.3mm) Group 1, 213mm (average 26.6mm) Group2 and 258mm (average 32.5mm). The average trochanter-trochanter: ATD ratio in group 1 was 2.7 (1.9–3.8) compared to 2.7 (2.3–3.2) and 2.3 (1.9–2.7) in groups 2 and 3 respectively. Conclusion. Our results suggest no difference in subsequent growth between hips that are prophylactically pinned and those that are not. Abnormal growth was observed in unpinned hips suggesting undiagnosed SUFE in some cases. In this series pinning had no effect on proximal femoral growth in patients with SUFE