Background. Current literature of definition, classification and outcomes of fractures of talar body remains controversial. Our primary purpose is to present an unusual combination of fractures of talar body with pantalar involvement / dislocation / extension as a basis for modification of Müller AO / OTA Classification. Methods. We include four consecutive patients, who sustained talar body fractures with pantalar subluxation/dislocation /extension. These unusual injury patterns lead us to reconsider Müller AO / OTA Classification in the light of another widely used talar fracture classification, Hawkins Classification of fractures of neck of talus and subsequent modification by Canale and Kelly. Results. Müller AO / OTA Classification comprises CI – Ankle joint involvement, C2 – Subtalar joint involvement, C3 – Ankle and subtalar joint involvement. We propose Modification of Müller AO / OTA. Classification. C1 – Absolutely undisplaced fracture; C2 – Ankle and Subtalar joint involvement: subluxation; C3 – Ankle and subtalar joint involvement: subluxation with comminution; C4 – Ankle, subtalar and talonavicular joint involvement. Conclusions. Our modification redefines Müller AO / OTA Classification, extends and fills the void in the classification by inclusion of C4, draws attention to stability of talonavicular joint and reflects increasing severity of injury in fractures of talar body

Controversy exists whether to treat unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures with either intra-medullary or extra-medullary devices. A prospective randomised control trial was performed to compare the outcome of unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures stabilised with either a sliding hip screw or long Gamma Nail. The hypothesis was that there is no difference in outcome between the two modes of treatment.

Over a four year period, 210 patients presenting with an unstable pertrochanteric hip fracture (AO/OTA 31 A2) were recruited into the study. Eligible patients were randomised on admission to either long Gamma Nail or sliding hip screw. Follow-up was arranged for three, six, and twelve months. Primary outcome measures were implant failure or ‘cut-out’. Secondary measures included mortality, length of hospital stay, transfusion rate, change in mobility and residence, and EuroQol outcome score.

Five patients required revision surgery for implant cut-out (2.5%), of which three were long Gamma Nails and two were sliding hip screws (no significant difference). There were no incidences of implant failure or deep infection. Tip apex distance was found to correlate with implant cut-out. There was no statistically significant difference in either the EuroQol outcome scores or mortality rates between the two groups when corrected for mini mental score. There was no difference in transfusion rates, length of hospital stay, and change in mobility or residence. There was a clear cost difference between the implants.

The sliding hip screw remains the gold standard in the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur.

Introduction. A subset of patients in cast awaiting fixation of ankle fractures require conversion to delayed external fixation (dEF). We aimed to evaluate the effect of delayed versus planned external fixation (pEF), then identify objective characteristics contributing to need for conversion. Method. We extracted data from our booking system to identify all ankle external fixation procedures between 2010 to 2022. Exclusions included open fractures, the skeletally immature, and pilon or talus fractures. Fractures were classified using the AO/OTA classification, then a matched cohort was identified based on fracture classification. We compared the planned, delayed and matched cohorts for demographics, posterior malleolar fragment (PMF) ratio, and degree of displacement at presentation. Results. We identified 25 pEF, 42 dEF, and 67 matched patients. Ankles with dEF had a 3.8 day longer time to ORIF from presentation than those who had pEF, and had an infection rate of 9.5%, compared to 4% in the pEF group. Two patients in the dEF group required further operative intervention. There were no infections or reoperations required in the pEF or matched groups. The dEF group were more likely to have ≥2 reductions (OR 4.13), a PMF ratio of >0.23 (OR 5.07), and have increased displacement at time of injury on lateral (32% vs 19%) and AP (62% vs 36%) radiographs. Discussion. Our retrospective study highlights the longer time to operation and increased infection rates of patients who do not get timely external fixation. We propose a series of objective parameters that predict failure of cast treatment and guide the surgeon to consider planned external fixation in some ankle

Acute Compartment Syndrome (ACS) is an orthopaedic emergency that can develop after a wide array of etiologies. In this pilot study the MY01 device was used to assess its ease of use and its ability to continuously reflect the intracompartmental pressure (ICP) and transmit this data to a mobile device in real time. This preliminary data is from the lead site which is presently expanding data collection to five other sites as part of a multi-center study. Patients with long bone trauma of the lower or upper extremity posing a possibility of developing compartment syndrome were enrolled in the study. Informed consent was obtained from the patients. A Health Canada licensed continuous compartmental pressure monitor (MY01) was used to measure ICP. The device was inserted in the compartment that was deemed most likely to develop ACS and ICP was continuously measured for up to 18 hours. Fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA classification. Patient clinical signs and pain levels were recorded by healthcare staff during routine in-patient monitoring and were compared to the ICP from the device. Important treatment information was pulled from the patient's chart to help correlate all of the patient's data and symptoms. The study period was conducted from November 2020 through December 2021. Twenty-six patients were enrolled. There were 17 males, and nine females. The mean age was 38 years (range, 17–76). Seventeen patients received the device post-operatively and nine received it pre-operatively. Preliminary results show that post-operative ICPs tend to be significantly higher than pre-operative ICPs but tend to trend downwards very quickly. The trend in this measurement appears to be more significant than absolute numbers which is a real change from the previous literature. One patient pre-operatively illustrated a steep trend upwards with minimal clinical symptoms but required compartment release at the time of surgery that exhibited no muscle necrosis. The trend in this patient was very steep and, as predicted, predated the clinical findings of compartment syndrome. This trend allows an early warning signal of the absolute pressure, to come, in the compartment that is being assessed by the device. Preliminary results suggest that this device is reliable and relatively easy to use within our institutions. In addition it suggests that intracompartmental pressures can be higher immediately post-op but lower rapidly when the patient does not develop ACS. These results are in line with current literature of the difference between pre and post-operative baselines and thresholds of ICP, but are much more striking, as continuous measurements have not been part of the data set in most of past studies. Further elucidation of the pressure thresholds and profiles are currently being studied in the ongoing larger multicenter study and will add to our understanding of the critical values. This data, plus the added value of continuous trends in the pressure, upwards or downwards, will aid in preventing muscle necrosis during our management of these difficult long bone fractures

Introduction. Distal femur fracture fixation in elderly presents significant challenges due to osteoporosis and associated comorbidities. There has been an evolution in the management of these fractures with a description of various surgical techniques and fixation methods; however, currently, there is no consensus on the standard of care. Non-union rates of up to 19% and mortality rates of up to 26 % at one year have been reported in the literature. Delay in surgery and delay in mobilisation post-operatively have been identified as two main factors for high rate of mortality. As biomechanical studies have proved better stability with dual plating or nail-plate combination, a trend has been shifting for past few years towards rigid fixation to allow early mobilisation. Our study aims to compare outcomes of distal femur fractures managed with either single plate (SP), dual plating (DP) or nail-plate construct (NP). Methods. A retrospective review of patients aged above 65 years with distal femur fractures (both native and peri-prosthetic) who underwent surgical management between June 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into three groups based on mode of fixation - single plate or dual plating or nail-plate construct. AO/OTA classification was used for non-periprosthetic, and Unified classification system (UCS) was used for periprosthetic fractures. Data on patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, postoperative complications, re-operation rate, radiological outcomes and mortality rate were evaluated. Primary objective was to compare re-operation rate and mortality rate between 3 groups at 30 days, 6 months and at 1 year. Results. A cohort of 32 patients with distal femur fractures were included in this study. 91% were females and mean age was 80.97 (range 68–97). 18 (53%) were non-periprosthetic fracture and 14 (47%) were periprosthetic fractures.18 patients underwent single plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 8, 33B/C – 2, UCS V3B – 5, V3C – 3),10 patients had dual plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 1, 33B/C – 4, UCS V3B – 3, V3C – 2) and 4 patients underwent nail-plate combination fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 4). 70.5% patients had surgery within 36 hours of admission and 90% within 48 hours. Analysis showed no re-operation at 30 days, 6 months in all 3 groups. At 1 year one patient had re-operation in dual-plating periprosthetic group (Distal femur replacement done for failed fixation). Three patients (16%) in single plate group had re-operation at 2 years (2 for peri-implant fracture and 1 for infection). None of the patients treated with Nail-plate combination had re-operation. Mortality rate at 30 days was 0% in among all the 3 groups. At 6 months, it was 16% in single plate group and 0% in DP and NP groups at 6 months and at 1 year mortality rate was 27% in SP group, 10% in DP and 0% in NP group. Combined mortality rate was 0% at 30 days, 9% at 6 months and 18.7% at one year. Conclusion. Our analysis provides insights into fixation methods of distal femur fractures in elderly patients. We conclude that a lower re-operation rate and mortality rate can be achieved with early surgery and rigid fixation with either dual plating or nail-plate construct to allow early mobilisation. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and guide the selection of optimal surgical strategies for these challenging fractures

Introduction. Ankle fractures in the elderly have been increasing with an ageing but active population and bring with them specific challenges. Medical co-morbidities, a poor soft tissue envelope and a requirement for early mobilisation to prevent morbidity and mortality, all create potential pitfalls to successful treatment. As a result, different techniques have been employed to try and improve outcomes. Total contact casting, both standard and enhanced open reduction internal fixation, external fixation and most recently tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing have all been proposed as suitable treatment modalities. Over the past five years popular literature has begun to herald TTC nailing as an appropriate and contemporary solution to the complex problem of high-risk ankle fragility fractures. We sought to assess whether, within our patient cohort, the outcomes seen supported the statement that TTC has equal outcomes to more traditional open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) when used to treat the high-risk ankle fragility fracture. Materials & Methods. Results of ORIF versus TTC nailing without joint preparation for treatment of fragility ankle fractures were evaluated via retrospective cohort study of 64 patients with high-risk fragility ankle fractures without our trauma centre. We aimed to assess whether results within our unit were equal to those seen within other published studies. Patients were matched 1:1 based on gender, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and ASA score. Patient demographics, AO/OTA fracture classification, intra-operative and post-operative complications, discharge destination, union rates, FADI scores and patient mobility were recorded. Results. There were 32 patients within each arm. Mean age was 78.4 (TTC) and 78.3 (ORIF). The CCI was 5.9 in each group respectively with mean ASA 2.9 (TTC) and 2.8 (ORIF). There were two open fractures within each group. Median follow up duration was 26 months. Time to theatre from injury was 8.0 days (TTC) versus 3.3 days (ORIF). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day, one year or overall mortality at final follow up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis did however demonstrate that of those patients who died post-operatively the mean time to mortality was significantly shorter in those treated with TTC nailing versus ORIF (20.3 months versus 38.2 months, p=0.013). There was no statistical difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups (46.9% versus 25%, p=0.12). The re-operation rate was twice as high in patients treated with TTC nailing however this was not statistically significant. There was no statistical difference in the FADI scores at final follow up, 72.1±12.9 (TTC) versus 67.9±13.9 (ORIF) nor post-operative mobility status. Conclusions. Within our study TTC nailing with an unprepared joint demonstrated broadly equivalent results to ORIF in the management of high-risk ankle fragility fractures; this replicates findings of previous studies. We did however observe that mean survival was significantly shorter in the TTC group than those treated with ORIF. We believe this may have been contributed to by a delay to theatre due to TTC stabilisation being treated as a sub-specialist operation in our unit at the time. We propose that both TTC and ORIF are satisfactory techniques to stabilise the frail ankle fracture however, similarly to the other fragility fractures, the priority should be on an emergent operation in a timely fashion in order to minimise the associated morbidity and mortality. Further randomised control studies are needed within the area to establish definitive results and a working consensus

Distal radius fractures have an incidence rate of 17.5% among all fractures. Their treatment in case of comminution, commonly managed by volar locking plates, is still challenging. Variable-angle screw technology could counteract these challenges. Additionally, combined volar and dorsal plate fixation is valuable for treatment of complex fractures at the distal radius. Currently, biomechanical investigation of the competency of supplemental dorsal plating is scant. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competency of double-plated distal radius fractures in comparison to volar locking plate fixation. Complex intra-articular distal radius fractures AO/OTA 23-C 2.1 and C 3.1 were created by means of osteotomies, simulating dorsal defect with comminution of the lunate facet in 30 artificial radii, assigned to 3 study groups with 10 specimens in each. The styloid process of each radius was separated from the shaft and the other articular fragments. In group 1, the lunate facet was divided to 3 equally-sized fragments. In contrast, the lunate in group 2 was split in a smaller dorsal and a larger volar fragment, whereas in group 3 was divided in 2 equal fragments. Following fracture reduction, each specimen was first instrumented with a volar locking plate and non-destructive quasi-static biomechanical testing under axial loading was performed in specimen's inclination of 40° flexion, 40° extension and 0° neutral position. Mediolateral radiographs were taken under 100 N loads in flexion and extension, as well as under 150 N loads in neutral position. Subsequently, all biomechanical tests were repeated after supplemental dorsal locking plate fixation of all specimens. Based on machine and radiographic data, stiffness and angular displacement between the shaft and lunate facet were determined. Stiffness in neutral position (N/mm) without/with dorsal plating was on average 164.3/166, 158.5/222.5 and 181.5/207.6 in groups 1–3. It increased significantly after supplementary dorsal plating in groups 2 and 3. Predominantly, from biomechanical perspective supplemental dorsal locked plating increases fixation stability of unstable distal radius fractures after volar locked plating. However, its effect depends on the fracture pattern at the distal radius

Proximal humeral fractures occur frequently, with fixed angle locking plates often being used for their treatment. However, the failure rate of this fixation is high, ranging between 10 and 35%. Numerous variables are thought to affect the performance of the fixation used, including the length and configuration of screws used and the plate position. However, there is currently limited quantitative evidence to support concepts for optimal fixation. The variations in surgical techniques and human anatomy make biomechanical testing prohibitive for such investigations. Therefore, a finite element osteosynthesis test kit has been developed and validated - SystemFix. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of variations in screw length, configuration and plate position on predicted failure risk of PHILOS plate fixation for unstable proximal humerus fractures using the test kit. Twenty-six low-density humerus models were selected and osteotomized to create a malreduced unstable three-part fracture AO/OTA 11-B3.2 with medial comminution which was virtually fixed with the PHILOS plate. In turn, four different screw lengths, twelve different screw configurations and five plate positions were simulated. Each time, three physiological loading cases were modelled, with an established finite element analysis methodology utilized to evaluate average peri-screw bone strain, this measure has been previously demonstrated to predict experimental fatigue fixation failure. All three core variables lead to significant differences in peri-screw strain magnitudes, i.e. predicted failure risk. With screw length, shortening of 4 mm in all screw lengths (the distance of the screw tips to the joint surface increasing from 4 mm to 8 mm) significantly (p < 0 .001) increased the risk of failure. In the lowest density bone, every additional screw reduced failure risk compared to the four-screw construct, whereas in more dense bone, once the sixth screw was inserted, no further significant benefit was seen (p=0.40). Screw configurations not including calcar screws, also demonstrated significant (p < 0 .001) increased risk of failure. Finally, more proximal plate positioning, compared to the suggested operative technique, was associated with reduced the predicted failure risk, especially in constructs using calcar screws, and distal positioning increased failure risk. Optimal fixation constructs were found when placing screws 4 mm from the joint surface, in configurations including calcar screws, in plates located more proximally, as these factors were associated with the greatest reduction in predicted fixation failure in 3-part unstable proximal humeral fractures. These results may help to provide practical recommendations on the implant usage for improved primary implant stability and may lead to better healing outcomes for osteoporotic proximal fracture patients. Whilst prospective clinical confirmation is required, using this validated computational tool kit enables the discovery of findings otherwise hidden by the variation and prohibitive costs of appropriately powered biomechanical studies using human samples

A large number of classification systems exist to assist in the evaluation and treatment of periprosthetic fractures following joint replacement. They vary in the language or categorisation they employ, the joints to which they are differently applied, the factors they assess, and the hierarchy or importance assigned to those factors. Not all incorporate the three most important variables which should govern treatment (fracture location, implant fixation, bone quality), nor the factors which have been demonstrated to most prominently influence outcomes. To a greater or lesser extent they attempt to include the principles of the Vancouver Classification System, and yet they differ in ways that lead to awkwardness in their application within the clinical setting. As an example, for fractures of the patella alone, three different systems have been proposed. As the result of an international effort endorsed by the AO/OTA, the Universal Classification System, or UCS, has been developed. It incorporates the most important factors that should influence evaluation, treatment, and outcomes evaluation. It applies the system to the musculoskeletal system as a whole, regardless of the joint involved or the bone that is broken. And it uses a single common language to describe the injury and prescribe the logical principles of treatment. It is hoped the UCS will appeal to our colleagues worldwide and will assist all of us in the care of our patients who suffer a periprosthetic fracture after joint replacement; be that the hip, knee, ankle, shoulder, elbow or wrist. The UCS can be applied with equal ease and merit to all

We evaluated the efficacy of using the expandable nail for treating non-union and malunion of the tibial and femoral shafts. Records of 20 patients were retrospectively reviewed: 12 had femoral non-union, 7 had tibial non-union, and one had tibial malunion. The bones underwent reaming and the largest possible nail sizes were inserted during reoperation. The mean age of the patients was 35 years (26-49) in the tibia group and 53 years (23-85) in the femur group. The fractures were defined according to AO/OTA classification and divided between open and closed. The initial treatment was 6 interlocking intramedullary nails and 2 external fixation in the tibia group, and 6 interlocking intramedullary nails, 3 plates and screws and 2 proximal femoral nails in the femoral group. The respective intervals between the original trauma and re-operation were 12 months and 15 months and the respective operation times were 59 minutes (35-70) and 68 minutes (20-120). All fractures healed satisfactorily without the need for an additional procedure. Healing time was 26 weeks (6-52) and 14 weeks (6-26) in the tibia and femur group, respectively. Limb shortenings of 10cm and 4cm were recorded in one patient each in the tibia group and of 3cm in one patient in the femur group. Using the expandable nail system permitted us to ream the bone and expand the nail to its maximal diameter, i.e. up to 16mm in the tibia and 19mm in the femur. We believe that using a bigger nail diameter contributes to better stabilisation of the fracture and promotes better and faster bone healing. Based on our experience, we recommend the use of the expandable nail system to treat tibia and femur shaft non-unions and malunions

Aim. To review the results of patients who underwent fixation of complex proximal femur fractures using the Proximal Femur Locking Plates (PFP) and analyse causes of failure of PFP. Methods. Retrospective review of radiographs and case notes of PFP fixations in two hospitals between February 2008 and June 2011. Primary outcome was union at six months. Secondary outcome included post-operative complications, and need for further surgical intervention. Results. There were a total of 32 patients who underwent 34 operations. Two patient had fracture of both the proximal femur requiring bilateral PFP fixation. Mean age of the patients was 68.4 years (range 17–96 years). There were twelve males and twenty female patients. 26 (81%) of the operations were done as primary surgery for fixation of the complex proximal femur fractures. According to the AO/OTA fracture classification, there were four cases of 31-A2.2, seven cases of 31-A2.3, two cases of 31-A3.1 one case each of 31-A3.2 and 32-B1.1 and ten cases of 31 A3.3 fractures. At least six months of follow up was achieved for 30 cases. Union was achieved in 20 fixations (62%) primarily; two more cases needed bone grafting at three months which went on to union improving the total union rate to 70% at 6 months. There was failure of fixation in eight cases requiring further surgery. Varus fixation, loss of posteromedial buttress and loss of protected weight bearing were associated with fixation failure. Conclusion. Contrary to the reported literature, (1) our results are better. Analysis of the failure cases emphasises the importance of postero medial buttress restoration, avoidance of varus fixation, and protection of weight bearing till fracture unites to achieve good outcome