Debate continues regarding the relative advantages of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) articulations in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Perceived benefits of CoC include longevity, and low wear - in turn limiting the effects of particulate wear debris. However, CoC bearings cost significantly more, and concern remains over the risk of ceramic fracture; a complication not seen with MoP bearings, which are also cheaper. We electronically randomised 268 consecutive patients undergoing THA to receive either a CoC or MoP articulation. Patients aged over 72 were excluded. In all patients the prosthesis used was an uncemented ABG II (Stryker, USA), implanted by one of the two senior authors (HDA, ABM). Patients were scored preoperatively, and at annual follow-up clinics, using SF36, Visual Analogue (VAS), Merle d'Aubigné (MD) and Oxford Hip (OHS) Scores. Satisfaction levels were also documented.Introduction
Method
