Post-meniscectomy syndrome is broadly characterised by intractable pain following the partial or total removal of a meniscus. There is a large treatment gap between the first knee pain after meniscectomy and the eligibility for a TKA. Hence, there is a strong unmet need for a solution that will relieve this post-meniscectomy pain. Goal of this first-in-man study was to evaluate the safety and performance of an anatomically shaped artificial medial meniscus prosthesis and the accompanying surgical technique. A first-in-man, prospective, multi-centre, single arm clinical investigation was intended to be performed on 18 post-medial meniscectomy syndrome patients with limited underlying cartilage damage (Kellgren Lawrence scale 0–3) in the medial compartment and having a normal lateral compartment. Eventually 5 patients received a polycarbonate urethane mediale meniscus prosthesis (Trammpolin® medial meniscus prosthesis; ATRO Medical B.V., the Netherlands) which was clicked onto two titanium screws fixated at the native horn attachments on the tibia. PROMs were collected at baseline and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months following the intervention including X-rays at 6, 12 and 24 Months. MRI scans were repeated after 12 and 24 months.Introduction
Methods
Tibial slope was shown to majorly affect the outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). More slope of the tibial component could help releasing a too tight flexion gap in cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA and is generally associated with a wider range of post-operative knee flexion. However, an excessive tibial slope could jeopardize the knee stability in flexion. The mechanism by which tibial slope affects the function of CR-TKA is not well understood. Moreover, it is not known whether the tibial bone resection should be performed by referencing the anterior cortex (AC) of the tibia or the center of the tibial plateau (CP) and whether the choice of either technique plays a role. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of tibial slope on the position of tibiofemoral (TF) contact point, knee ligament forces, quadriceps muscle forces, and TF and patellofemoral (PF) joint contact forces during squat activity in CR-TKA. A previously validated musculoskeletal model of CR-TKA was used to simulate a squat activity performed by a 86-year-old male subject wearing an instrumented prosthesis [1,2]. Marker data over four consecutive repetitions of a squat motion were tracked using a motion optimization algorithm. Muscle and joint forces and moments were calculated from an inverse-dynamic analysis, coupled with Force-Dependent Kinematics (FDK) to solve knee kinematics, ligament and contact forces simultaneously. The tibial slope in the postoperative case was 0 degree and constituted the reference case for our simulations. In addition, eight additional cases were simulated with −3, +3, +6, +9 degrees of tibial slope, four of them simulating an AC referencing technique and four a CP technique.Introduction
Methods
Special high-flexion prosthetic designs show a small increase in postoperative flexion compared to standard designs and some papers show increased anterior knee pain with these prosthesis. However, no randomised controlled trails have been published which investigate difference in postoperative complaints of anterior knee pain. To assess difference in passive and active postoperative flexion and anterior knee pain we performed a randomized clinical trial including the two extremes of knee arthroplasty designs, being a high flex posterior stabilized rotating platform prosthesis versus a traditional cruciate retaining fixed bearing prosthesis. We hypothesised that the HF-PS design would allow more flexion, due to increased femoral rollback with less anterior knee pain than the CR design. We specifically assessed the following hypotheses: Patients have increased flexion after HF-PS TKA compared to CR TKA, both passive and active. Patients show an increased femoral rollback in the HF-PS TKA as compared to the CR TKA. Patients receiving a HF-PS TKA design report reduced anterior knee pain relative to those receiving the CR TKA. In total 47 patients were randomly allocated to a standard cruciate retaining fixed bearing design (CR) in 23 patients and to a high-flexion posterior stabilized mobile bearing design (HF-PS) in 24 patients. Preoperative and one year postoperative we investigated active and passive maximal flexion. Furthermore, we used the VAS pain score at rest and during exercise and the Feller score to investigate anterior knee pain. A lateral roentgen photograph was used to measure femoral rollback during maximal flexion.Introduction
Methods
A few follow-up studies of high flexion total knee arthoplasties report disturbingly high incidences of femoral loosening. Finite element analysis showed a high risk for early loosening at the cement-implant interface at the anterior flange. However, femoral implant fixation is depending on two interfaces: cement-implant interface and the cement-bone interface. Due to the geometry of the distal femur, a part of the cement-bone interface consists of cement-cortical bone interface. The strength of the cement-bone interface is lower than the strength of the cement-implant interface. The research questions addressed in this study were: 1) which interface is more prone to loosening and 2) what is the effect of different surgical preparation techniques on the risk for early loosening. To achieve data for the cement-(cortical)bone interface strength and the effects of different preparation techniques on interfacial strength, human cadaver interface stress tests were performed for different preparation techniques of the bony surface and the results were implemented in a finite element (FE) model as described before. The FE model consisted of a proximal tibia and fibula, TKA components, a quadriceps and patella tendon and a non-resurfaced patella. For use in this study, the distal femur was integrated in the FE model including cohesive interface elements and a 1 mm bone cement layer. In the model, the cement-bone interface was divided into two areas, representing cortical and cancellous bone. The posterior-stabilised PFC Sigma RP-F (DePuy, J&J, USA) was incorporated in the FE knee model following the surgical procedure provided by the manufacturer. A full weight-bearing squatting cycle was simulated (ROM = 50°-155°). The interface failure index was calculated.Introduction
Materials & methods
In the present study we describe the clinical results of the Scientific Hip Prosthesis® (SHP). With the goal of smoothening cement-bone interface stress peaks, the SHP was developed using shape optimization algorithms together with finite element modelling techniques. The resulting shape and cement stresses are seen in Figure 1. The introduction of the SHP prosthesis was performed in a stepwise fashion including a RSA study performed by Nivbrant et al1. RSA studies for prosthetic types that are in long-term use are of great value in predicting the survivorship related to the migration rate and pattern for that specific type of prosthesis. If a stem in a patient shows a much higher migration rate than the typical one, the stem may be identified as at high-risk for early loosening. The study of Nivbrant et al1 revealed unexpectedly high migration values and it was stated that the SHP stem was not the preferred stem to use despite the good Harris Hip Score and Pain score at two years follow-up. In the present study the clinical results of a single surgeon study consisting of 171 hips with a follow-up of 5–12 years were evaluated. The mean follow-up was 8.2 years (5.0–12.0). The survival rate was 98.8% at ten years follow-up for aseptic loosening of the stem. The mean Harris Hip Score at 10 year follow-up was 89.2 ± 7.5. This study therefore indicates that a new prosthetic design may function clinically rather well, despite the relatively high migration rates which have been reported. In case of a RSA study with a new prosthesis it may not be so evident what the expected “typical” migration rate or pattern is. So in order to predict early loosening the typical migration rate has to be known. Perhaps typical migration rates can be established using standardized cadaver migration experiments or computer simulation models techniques. Since these standardized tools are currently not available, the prediction of clinical survival of new prosthetic components remains a challenging task and the interpretation of migration rates with new designs should be considered with much caution.
Malfunctioning of Total Knee Replacements is often related to patella-femoral problems. As the patella groove guides the patella during flexion, the difference between anatomic- and prosthetic groove geometry may be of major influence concerning patella-femoral problems. This study focusses on the orientation or direction of the femoral patella groove, relative to the mechanical axis of the femur. Literature shows a controversy in measured groove orientation: Eckhoff et al. (1996) have measured a lateral groove, and Feinstein et al. (1996) have measured a medial groove, relative to the mechanical axis. Current femoral knee components have a lateral, or neutral directed patella groove. As most TKA surgical techniques subscribe an exorotation of the femoral component during implantation, the prosthetic in vivo situation will show a lateral groove. The objectives were to clarify the described controversy and to determine whether there is a difference in anatomic- and prosthetic groove orientation, which might cause patella-femoral problems. The patella groove orientation of 100 human femora was measured using a 3-D measurement system. A spherical measurement probe was moved through the groove, starting at the notch and finishing at the cartilage edge, to simulate patella motion. The patella groove angle was defined as the angle between the mechanical axis and the measured groove points, in the frontal plane. A medial patella groove angle of 1.8±2.6° was measured. An implanted situation of a femoral component with neutral groove showed a lateral groove angle of 1.3°. An implanted situation of a femoral component with assymmetrical groove showed a lateral groove angle of 2.6°. The authors measured a medial oriented patella groove. This anatomical groove orientation is in contradiction with current femoral knee component design and surgical practice, because that results in a lateral oriented groove. This difference in anatomic- and prosthetic groove orientation may be a cause of patella-femoral problems.
