Treatment for Freiberg's disease is largely conservative. For severe disease and refractory cases, there are various surgical options. Most studies are from the Far-Eastern population and have short follow-up. The purpose of this study was to report the 5 year clinical outcomes of a dorsal closing wedge osteotomy in the treatment of advanced Freiberg´s disease in a Caucasian population.

Twelve patients (12 feet), with a mean age of 30.7 years (range 17–55), were treated with a synovectomy and a dorsal closing wedge osteotomy of the affected distal metatarsal. There were 10 females and 2 males. All patients were born in the United Kingdom. Clinical outcomes were independently evaluated pre and postoperatively using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scoring system and a subjective satisfaction score. Nine (75%) feet involved the 2^nd metatarsal and 3 feet (25%) involved the 3^rd metatarsal. According to the Smillie classification, 6 feet were Grade IV and 6 feet were grade V. Radiological union was evaluated postoperatively.

No patients were lost to follow up and the mean follow-up time was 5.2 years (4–7). AOFAS scores improved from 48.1 +/− 7.4 to 88.9 +/− 10.1 postoperatively (p< 0.001) giving a mean improvement of 40.8. 92% of patients were satisfied with their operation at latest follow-up, reporting excellent or good results. All patients had postoperative radiological union. One patient had a superficial postoperative infection that was successfully treated with oral antibiotics.

A dorsal closing wedge osteotomy is an effective treatment of advanced Freiberg´s disease in a Caucasian population, with good outcomes and few complications.

Introduction: Practice guidelines recommend functional restoration as a cardinal intervention for chronic low back pain. Published studies attest variously to either modest or good efficacy for functional restoration programs. However, although published data might set a benchmark of what outcomes can be achieved in research studies, they do not necessarily indicate what is actually achieved in conventional practice.

Methods: A prospective audit was undertaken of all patients referred for functional restoration in a rehabilitation service dedicated primarily to the treatment of low back pain. In accordance with published principles 1, the program provided education and physical rehabilitation in a cognitive-behavioural milieu. Before treatment, immediately after treatment, and three months and six months later, patients were assessed, by a research nurse not involved in the patients’ care, using a visual analogue scale for pain, the SF36 for function, a patient-specified functional outcome scale, and the treatment helpfulness questionnaire. As well, the need for other care was recorded.

Results: Forty-six patients enrolled in the study, but nine did not complete the rehabilitation program, and five withdrew their consent. Only two were lost to follow-up. Before treatment, those patients who withdrew and those who participated did not differ in presenting features. All had a moderate level of pain; they were moderately disabled in physical functioning, social functioning, and vitality; but were only slightly impaired in general health and mental health. All could nominate four activities of daily living that were impaired by their pain and which most dearly they would want restored. After treatment, median pain scores did not improve; nor was physical functioning, or social functioning, or vitality improved. Only one patient restored their desired activities of daily living. The majority of patients (25/30) restored no activity. These outcomes did not improve at the 3-month or 6 month-review. Patients previously unemployed remained unemployed. The proportion of patients previously employed (80%) fell immediately after treatment (70%) and remained stable thereafter. All patients required some form of continuing care from their general practitioner. Notwithstanding these outcomes, the majority of patients rated the program as helpful (57%) or extremely helpful (33%).

Discussion: The sample size in the present study was similar to that used in the original studies that promoted functional restoration. Statistically and clinically, the outcomes in this audit are incompatible and totally dissonant with published claims of 80% success rates for functional restoration programs. The 95% confidence intervals of a success rate of zero are 0 to 11%, which fails to reach the lower 95% confidence interval of 80%, which is 66%. These results warn that what is achieved in conventional practice may not reflect the benchmarks established in the literature. Evidence from research may not translate into standards of practice. Citing the literature is not a substitute or surrogate for auditing one’s own outcomes.

Aim

Subjective and objective review of our early experience with scarf osteotomy for correction of Hallux valgus

Introduction

Scarf joint is a technique used by carpenters to increase the size of entrance by longitudinally joining beams of timbers.

Scarf osteotomy of the first metatarsal is a ‘Z’-osteotomy with inherent stability. The convalescence is short and complications of avascular necrosis and non-union are rarely reported. The combination of soft tissue procedure with the osteotomy consistently gives good correction of hallux valgus.

Methods and Results

The records, radiographs were reviewed and the subjective assessment by telephone interview. Forty-one patients had a scarf procedure but only 31 patients (37 scarf procedures) could be contacted by telephone.

All patients were females with a mean age of 44.6(16–76) years. Mean follow-up was 14 months(12 to 18 months).

The results were reviewed using the guideline recommended by the Research Committee of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Mean preoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA) was 30.4°(20–48°) and the postoperative HVA was 14.6°(9–22°). The mean pre-operative intermetatarsal angle (IMA) was 4.1°(10–22°) and postoperatively was 8.4°(5–12°). There was significant correction of the tibia sesamoid position (p=0.001). There was no avascular necrosis or non-union. Eighty-eight percent of patients were satisfied; two patients had infection and two stiff MTP joints.

Conclusion

Scarf osteotomy gives very good correction of hallux valgus and tibia sesamoid position. Patient satisfaction was good with a low complication rate, the fixation after the osteotomy was very stable and no post-operative splint was required.