header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 4 - 4
1 Dec 2015
Walter R Trimble K Westwood M
Full Access

Lisfranc fracture dislocations of the midfoot are uncommon but serious injuries, associated with posttraumatic arthrosis, progressive deformity, and persistent pain. Management of the acute injury aims to restore anatomic tarsometatarsal alignment in order to minimise these complications. Reduction and stabilisation can be performed using image-guided percutaneous reduction and screw stabilisation (aiming to minimise the risk of wound infection) or through open plating techniques (in order to visualise anatomic reduction, and to avoid chondral damage from transarticular screws). This retrospective study compares percutaneous and open treatment in terms of radiographic reduction and incidence of early complications.

Case records and postoperative radiographs of all patients undergoing reduction and stabilisation of unstable tarsometatarsal joint injuries between 2011 and 2014 in our institution were reviewed. Dorsoplantar, oblique and lateral radiographs were assessed for accuracy of reduction, with malreduction being defined as greater than 2mm tarsometatarsal malalignment in any view. The primary outcome measure was postoperative radiographic alignment. Secondary outcome measures included the incidence of infection and other intra- or early postoperative complications.

During the study period, 32 unstable midfoot injuries were treated, of which 19 underwent percutaneous reduction and screw stabilisation and 13 underwent open reduction and internal fixation. Of the percutaneous group, no wound infections were reported, and there were four (21.1%) malreduced injuries. Of the open group, two infections (15.4%) were observed, and no cases of malreduction.

In conclusion, our study shows a strong trend towards increased risk of malreduction when percutaneous techniques are used to treat midfoot injuries, and an increased risk of infection when open surgery is used. Whilst conclusions are limited by the retrospective data collection, this study demonstrates the relative risks to consider when selecting a surgical approach.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXII | Pages 69 - 69
1 May 2012
Thomason K Paton J Trimble K Metcalfe J Marsden J
Full Access

Introduction

Shoes with a rocker sole are commonly prescribed following forefoot surgery to redistribute pressure towards the heel. By shifting the body weight backwards, does the rocker shoe adversely effect balance and so disturb normal muscle activity? This study investigated the effects of the Darco post-operative shoe, and the impact of a contralateral shoe raise, on forefoot pressure, posture and balance.

Materials and Methods

Fourteen healthy volunteers were investigated (age 36 ±10.8 yrs 11 females) either wearing (1) left Darco shoe and right standard shoe with/without a 5cm temporary shoe raise (Algeos Ltd) (2) two standard shoes. Postural sway was measured while standing with eyes open/closed and on/off a foam block. Dynamic balance was measured while stepping forwards/backwards and walking. Measurements of foot pressure (TECSKAN Inc USA), 3D body motion (Codamotion, UK) and surface electromyography of lower limb muscles were taken. Results were analysed using a repeated measures ANOVA.