Gait measurements can vary due to various intrinsic and extrinsic factors, and this variability becomes more pronounced using inertial sensors in a free-living environment. Therefore, identifying and quantifying the sources of variability is essential to ensure measurement reliability and maintain data quality.

This study aimed to determine the variability of daily accelerations recorded by an inertial sensor in a group of healthy individuals. Ten participants, four males and six females, with a mean age of 50 years (range: 29–61) and BMI of 26.9 kg/m² (range: 21.4–36.8), were included. A single accelerometer continuously recorded lower limb accelerations over two weeks. We extracted and analyzed the accelerations of three consecutive strides within walking bouts if the time difference between the bouts was more than two hours. Multivariate mixed-effects modeling was performed on both the discretized acceleration waveforms at 101 points (0–100) and the harmonics of the signals in the frequency domain to determine the variance components for different subjects, days, bouts, and steps as the random effect variables. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for between-day, between-bout, and between-step comparisons.

The results showed that the ICCs for the between-day, between-bout, and between-step comparisons were 0.73, 0.82, 0.99 for the vertical axis; 0.64, 0.75, 0.99 for the anteroposterior axis; and 0.55, 0.96, 0.97 for the mediolateral axis. For the signal harmonics, the respective ICCs were 0.98, 0.98, 0.99 for the vertical axis; 0.54, 0.93, 0.98 for the anteroposterior axis; and 0.69, 0.78, 0.95 for the mediolateral axis.

Overall, this study demonstrated that accelerations recorded continuously for multiple days in a free-living environment exhibit high variability, mainly between days, and some variability arising from differences between walking bouts during different times within days. However, reliable and repeatable gait measurements can be obtained by identifying and quantifying the sources of variability.

The tendency towards using inertial sensors for remote monitoring of the patients at home is increasing. One of the most important characteristics of the sensors is sampling rate. Higher sampling rate results in higher resolution of the sampled signal and lower amount of noise. However, higher sampling frequency comes with a cost. The main aim of our study was to determine the validity of measurements performed by low sampling frequency (12.5 Hz) accelerometers (SENS) in patients with knee osteoarthritis compared to standard sensor-based motion capture system (Xsens). We also determined the test-retest reliability of SENS accelerometers.

Participants were patients with unilateral knee osteoarthritis. Gait analysis was performed simultaneously by using Xsens and SENS sensors during two repetitions of over-ground walking at a self-selected speed. Gait data from Xsens were used as an input for AnyBody musculoskeletal modeling software to measure the accelerations at the exact location of two defined virtual sensors in the model (VirtualSENS). After preprocessing, the signals from SENS and VirtualSENS were compared in different coordinate axes in time and frequency domains. ICC for SENS data from first and second trials were calculated to assess the repeatability of the measurements.

We included 32 patients (18 females) with median age 70.1[48.1 – 85.4]. Mean height and weight of the patients were 173.2 ± 9.6 cm and 84.2 ± 14.7 kg respectively. The correlation between accelerations in time domain measured by SENS and VirtualSENS in different axes was r = 0.94 in y-axis (anteroposterior), r = 0.91 in x-axis (vertical), r = 0.83 in z-axis (mediolateral), and r = 0.89 for the magnitude vector. In frequency domain, the value and the power of fundamental frequencies (F₀) of SENS and VirtualSENS signals demonstrated strong correlation (r = 0.98 and r = 0.99 respectively). The result of test-retest evaluation showed excellent repeatability for acceleration measurement by SENS sensors. ICC was between 0.89 to 0.94 for different coordinate axes.

Low sampling frequency accelerometers can provide valid and reliable measurements especially for home monitoring of the patients, in which handling big data and sensors cost and battery lifetime are among important issues.