header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 297 - 297
1 Jul 2011
Sivardeen Z Olubajo F Khan I
Full Access

The use of shoulder ultrasound in clinic is a way of decreasing the time patients have to wait til definitive treatment is started. Although ultrasound is used in clinic by some surgeons, we are not aware of anyone specifically looking at the total cost implications and the impact on waiting times.

We therefore prospectively assessed the outcome of a one-stop shoulder assessment service set up by a new Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon in a busy unit. All new patients were assessed by the Consultant, who then performed an ultrasound if indicated. Treatment or further investigation was then instituted based on the findings. The time taken and accuracy of the scans, the number of patients seen, impact on waiting times, total savings and patient satisfaction were assessed. We based cost calculations from data that included capital, structural, maintenance and staffing costs gained from the Department of Health and the hospital management.

We found that 65% of all shoulder patients required ultrasound, and these were performed in an average of 2.7 minutes, with no significant overrunning of the clinic. The sensitivity for the detection of full thickness rotator cuff tears was 88% and specificity was 89%. Four patients needed further ultrasonography by a specialist musculoskeletal radiologist. All patients reported high satisfaction rates. We calculated the cost saving over a year of two shoulder surgeons performing ultrasound in a similar setting was between £200,000 and £500,000 depending on the figures you used.

We believe ultrasound is a quick, easy, cheap imaging process for the diagnosis of soft tissue shoulder diseases. When performed at the first consultation by the surgeon it offers the advantages of high patient satisfaction rates, shorter waiting times, and significant cost savings. Should all shoulder surgeons be performing ultrasound in clinic?


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 306 - 307
1 Jul 2011
Sivardeen Z Wafai A Ali A Chetty N Holdsworth B Stanley D Olubajo F
Full Access

Background: Intra-articular distal humeral fractures in the elderly are difficult to treat. There is evidence in the literature to support the use of both open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) as primary procedures, although we have been unable to find any direct comparisons of outcome.

Methods: This study reports the results of ORIF in 12 elderly patients with distal humeral fractures and compares the outcome with 12 matched patients who had undergone TEA. All procedures were performed by two Consultant elbow surgeons. The Coonrad-Morrey TEA was used in all cases of TEA and a double-plating technique was used in all ORIFs. Both groups of patients were similar with respect to fracture configuration, age, sex, comorbidity and hand dominance. The mean follow-up in both groups of patients was over 30 months.

Results: At final review, patients who had had a TEA had a mean Mayo score of 91 and a range of flexion/extension of 90 degrees. There was 1 superficial wound infection that resolved with antibiotics, 1 temporary radial nerve palsy, and 1 case of heterotrophic ossification The ORIF group had a mean Mayo score of 89 (p> 0.05) and a range of flexion/extension of 112 degrees (P=0.03). There was 1 case of heterotrophic ossification, 2 cases of ulnar nerve compression that needed decompression and 1 superficial wound infection that resolved with antibiotics. All the fractures united.

Conclusion: This study indicates that both treatment modalities can lead to excellent results. ORIF has the advantage of preserving the joint and once union has occurred has a low risk of long term complications.