Our meta-analysis showed that pooled mean blood loss during spinal tumour surgeries was 2180 ml. Standardised methods of calculating and reporting intra-operative blood loss are needed as it would be beneficial in the pre-operative planning of blood replenishment during surgery. The vertebral column is the commonest site of bony metastasis, accounting for 18,000 new cases in North America yearly. Patients with spinal metastasis are often elderly, have compromised cardiovascular status, poor physiological reserve and altered immune status, all of which render them more susceptible to the complications of intra-operative blood loss and associated transfusion. Currently no consensus exists regarding the expected volume of blood lost during metastatic spine tumour surgery with various papers quoting anywhere between 1L to 6L. Knowledge of the expected blood loss prior to surgery however is important as it facilitates pre-operative planning, intra- and post-operative management of fluid balance and blood transfusion. We conducted a meta-analysis of published literature on spine tumour surgery to answer the question: “What is the expected blood loss in major spinal tumour surgery for metastatic spinal disease?”Summary
Introduction
There is emerging evidence of successful application of IOCS and leucocyte depletion filter in removing tumour cells from blood salvaged during various oncological surgeries. Research on the use of IOCS-LDF in MSTS is urgently needed. Intra-operative cell salvage (IOCS) can reduce allogeneic blood transfusion requirements in non-tumour related spinal surgery. However, IOCS is deemed contraindicated in metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS) due to risk of tumour dissemination. Evidence is emerging from different surgical specialties describing the use of IOCS in cancer surgery. We wanted to investigate if IOCS is really contraindicated in MSTS. We hereby present a systematic literature review to answer the following questions: 1. Has IOCS ever been used in MSTS? 2. Is there any evidence to support the use of IOCS in other oncologic surgeries?Summary
Introduction
There is currently no consensus about the mean
volume of blood lost during spinal tumour surgery and surgery for metastatic
spinal disease. We conducted a systematic review of papers published
in the English language between 31 January 1992 and 31 January 2012.
Only papers that clearly presented blood loss data in spinal surgery
for metastatic disease were included. The random effects model was
used to obtain the pooled estimate of mean blood loss. We selected 18 papers, including six case series, ten retrospective
reviews and two prospective studies. Altogether, there were 760
patients who had undergone spinal tumour surgery and surgery for
metastatic spinal disease. The pooled estimate of peri-operative
blood loss was 2180 ml (95% confidence interval 1805 to 2554) with catastrophic
blood loss as high as 5000 ml, which is rare. Aside from two studies
that reported large amounts of mean blood loss (>
5500 ml), the
resulting funnel plot suggested an absence of publication bias.
This was confirmed by Egger’s test, which did not show any small-study
effects
(p = 0.119). However, there was strong evidence of heterogeneity
between studies (I2 = 90%; p <
0.001). Spinal surgery for metastatic disease is associated with significant
blood loss and the possibility of catastrophic blood loss. There
is a need to establish standardised methods of calculating and reporting
this blood loss. Analysis should include assessment by area of the
spine, primary pathology and nature of surgery so that the amount
of blood loss can be predicted. Consideration should be given to
autotransfusion in these patients. Cite this article:
