Clinic letters to the general practitioner (GP) form an essential part of communication in a patient's care. One essential variable requiring 100% compliance is the laterality/side of the diagnosis. Rationale of this audit was to check compliance of the same in clinic letters, to implement changes within the department initially followed by trust wide change in policy to improve the same. Clinic letters over a period of time were read through in retrospect to see for mention of side. The exclusion criteria were COVID consenting letters over phone, “did not attend” letters and letters for spinal pathology. After 1st limb of audit following actions were taken: doctor education, secretaries to remind the dictating doctor to mention side in the letter and putting up of laminated prompters in all T&O clinic rooms to remind doctors. Following this a 2nd limb was conducted with similar parameters.Abstract
Introduction
Material and Methods
Aim of our study was to find an association of additional intra-artricular derangements due to the delay in referring a patient with Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury to a consultant orthopaedic clinic. We carried out a retrospective review of 50 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (performed arthroscopically taking semitendinosis tendon graft) between July 2007 and November 2008. Orthopaedic referrals were grouped into A&E-group (48%) and GP-group (52%). Average time span between initial injury and patient's first contact with an orthopaedic surgeon was 10 days in the AE-group and 30 months in the GP-group. On analysing the MRI scans we found a significant difference regarding the presence of additional injuries: A&E-group had less medial meniscus injuries (43.75%) compared to the GP-group (65%). Lateral meniscus injuries were present in 18.75% in A&E-group and in 35% in GP-group. Findings during arthroscopic ACL reconstruction revealed following differences: A&E-group had less medial meniscus injuries (30.43%) compared to the GP-group (46.15%). Lateral meniscus injuries were 43.48 % and 30.77 % in A&E-group and GP-group respectively. Lysholm Knee Scoring system was used in both the groups pre- and postoperatively. The A&E-group had better results preoperatively (average 56.7) and postoperatively (average 95.5) when compared to the GP group which had shown scores to be 50.4 (pre-op) and 90.7 (post-op).Introduction
Methods and results
