Introduction

Distal femur fracture fixation in elderly presents significant challenges due to osteoporosis and associated comorbidities. There has been an evolution in the management of these fractures with a description of various surgical techniques and fixation methods; however, currently, there is no consensus on the standard of care. Non-union rates of up to 19% and mortality rates of up to 26 % at one year have been reported in the literature. Delay in surgery and delay in mobilisation post-operatively have been identified as two main factors for high rate of mortality. As biomechanical studies have proved better stability with dual plating or nail-plate combination, a trend has been shifting for past few years towards rigid fixation to allow early mobilisation. Our study aims to compare outcomes of distal femur fractures managed with either single plate (SP), dual plating (DP) or nail-plate construct (NP).

Periarticular fractures of the proximal tibia are some of the most difficult fractures to manage as open reduction and internal fixation of the fractures is plagued with complications such as non-union, delayed union, infection and post-traumatic osteoarthritis.

We evaluated the results of 16 consecutive periarticular tibial fractures stabilised with the AO hybrid fixator using the Oxford Knee Score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) and X-rays of the tibia. Two patients were lost to follow up and 1 patient refused to take part in the study whose latest radiographs showed grade 4 degenerative changes.

The mean follow up was 34 months (range 12 to 57 months) and the mean age was 50 years. All fractures were closed and were graded as either Schatzker 5 or 6. The fixator was applied for an average of 12 weeks. The mean Oxford Knee score was 27.2/60 (mild to moderate knee arthritis) and the mean AOFAS was 71.9/100. There was no significant malunion however 37.5% had developed radiological evidence of grade 3 or 4 post-traumatic osteoarthritis with one requiring a total knee replacement. Forty four percent of patients developed a complication with pin site infection being the commonest complication and 25% required further surgery. There were 2 nonunions with one requiring a fibular osteotomy, which subsequently united.

Eighty eight percent of patients were satisfied with the procedure while 80% would recommend the procedure if required in future.

From our study we feel that hybrid fixation of proximal periarticular tibial fractures is satisfactory however preoperative counselling regarding complications and the possible need for further surgery must be emphasised to the patient prior to embarking on this type of fixation.

Introduction & aims: Quadriceps muscle wasting is common in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and knee. Previous studies,using ultrasound and performing biopsies, have demonstrated quadriceps muscle fibre atrophy. Thigh girth measurements are quoted in textbooks as a means of quantitatively assessing muscle bulk. This study has looked at these measurements in patients with hip and knee OA to see if these measurements are useful.

Method: 87 patients (mean age 62, range 36–87) with a diagnosis of OA were seen in the pre-assessment clinic. 47 were awaiting total hip replacement (THR) and 40 were awaiting total knee replacement (TKR).All were awaiting primary arthroplasty and had not had previous joint surgery. Thigh girth measurements were taken at 2 points corresponding with one-third and two-thirds of the length between the anterior superior iliac spine and the tibial tuberosity. These measurements were taken for both thighs. The observed differences were analysed with normal probability plots and paired Student’s t-tests.

Results: No significant difference in thigh girth could be detected in patients awaiting total knee replacement. Girth was significantly reduced in the thigh on the side of planned THR. This difference was apparent when measured both proximally and distally.

Conclusion: Measurements of thigh girth were not useful indicators of quadriceps wasting in patients awaiting TKR. Patients awaiting THR should have thigh girth measured, those with reduced thigh girth on the side of planned arthroplasty may have quadriceps atrophy and can then be referred for physiotherapy prior to surgery.