Subtle deformities of the acetabulum and proximal femur are recognised as biomechanical risk factors for the development of hip osteoarthritis (OA) as well as a cause of hip and groin pain. We undertook this study to examine relationships between a number of morphological measurements of the acetabulum and proximal femur and the hip pain in a 20-year longitudinal study. In 1989 women of 45–64 years of age were recruited. Each had an AP-Pelvis radiograph at Year-2. These radiographs were analysed using a validated programme for measuring morphology. All morphological measurements were read blinded to outcome. At year 3 all participants were asked whether they experienced hip pain (side specific). This was repeated at visits up to and including 20-years. Logistic regression analysis (with robust standard errors and clustering by subject identifier) was performed using hip pain as a binary outcome. The model adjusted for baseline age, BMI and joint space and included only participants who were pain free on initial questioning.Introduction
Methods
This study describes the prevalence of pain, functional loss and rotator cuff tears (RCTs) in a general population cohort. It is the first multidisciplinary assessment in such a cohort. The Chingford cohort is a 19-year old longitudinal population study comprising 1003 women aged between 44 and 67 at baseline. To date 183 consecutive subjects (366) shoulders have been interviewed about their shoulders. Myometric strength assessment and high-definition ultrasound examination (US) have been performed on all shoulders. Additionally pain thresholds and perceptions of pain have been tested using quantitative sensory testing (QST) and a number of validated questionnaires, including the illness attitudes scale and the pain detect score.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
We obtained information from the Elective Orthopaedic
Centre on 1523 patients with baseline and six-month Oxford hip scores
(OHS) after undergoing primary hip replacement (THR) and 1784 patients
with Oxford knee scores (OKS) for primary knee replacement (TKR)
who completed a six-month satisfaction questionnaire. Receiver operating characteristic curves identified an absolute
change in OHS of 14 points or more as the point that discriminates
best between patients’ satisfaction levels and an 11-point change
for the OKS. Satisfaction is highest (97.6%) in patients with an
absolute change in OHS of 14 points or more, compared with lower
levels of satisfaction (81.8%) below this threshold. Similarly,
an 11-point absolute change in OKS was associated with 95.4% satisfaction
compared with 76.5% below this threshold. For the six-month OHS
a score of 35 points or more distinguished patients with the highest
satisfaction level, and for the six-month OKS 30 points or more identified
the highest level of satisfaction. The thresholds varied according
to patients’ pre-operative score, where those with severe pre-operative
pain/function required a lower six-month score to achieve the highest
levels of satisfaction. Our data suggest that the choice of a six-month follow-up to
assess patient-reported outcomes of THR/TKR is acceptable. The thresholds
help to differentiate between patients with different levels of
satisfaction, but external validation will be required prior to
general implementation in clinical practice.
