header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 123 - 123
2 Jan 2024
Hofmann S
Full Access

Metabolic bone diseases, such as osteoporosis and osteopetrosis, result from an imbalanced bone remodeling process. In vitro bone models are often used to investigate either bone formation or resorption independently, while in vivo, these processes are coupled. Combining these processes in a co-culture is challenging as it requires finding the right medium components to stimulate each cell type involved without interfering with the other cell type's differentiation. Furthermore, differentiation stimulating factors often comprise growth factors in supraphysiological concentrations, which can overshadow the cell-mediated crosstalk and coupling.

To address these challenges, we aimed to recreate the physiological bone remodeling process, which follows a specific sequence of events starting with cell activation and bone resorption by osteoclasts, reversal, followed by bone formation by osteoblasts. We used a mineralized silk fibroin scaffold as a bone-mimetic template, inspired by bone's extracellular matrix composition and organization. Our model supported osteoclastic resorption and osteoblastic mineralization in the specific sequence that represents physiological bone remodeling.

We also demonstrated how culture variables, such as different cell ratios, base media, and the use of osteogenic/osteoclast supplements, and the application of mechanical load, can be adjusted to represent either a high bone turnover system or a self-regulating system. The latter system did not require the addition of osteoclastic and osteogenic differentiation factors for remodeling, therefore avoiding growth factor use.

Our in vitro model for bone remodeling has the potential to reduce animal experiments and advance in vitro drug development for bone remodeling pathologies like osteoporosis. By recreating the physiological bone remodeling cycle, we can investigate cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, which are essential for understanding bone physiology and pathology. Furthermore, by tuning the culture variables, we can investigate bone remodeling under various conditions, potentially providing insights into the mechanisms underlying different bone disorders.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 82 - 82
1 Mar 2021
Melke J Hofmann S
Full Access

It is well known that environmental cues such as mechanical loading and/or cell culture medium composition affect tissue-engineered constructs resembling natural bone. These studies are mostly based on an initial setting of the influential parameter that will not be further changed throughout the study. Through the growth of the cells and the deposition of the extracellular matrix (ECM) the initial environmental conditions of the cells will change, and with that also the loads on the cells will change. This study investigates how changes of mechanical load or media composition during culture influences the differentiation and ECM production of mesenchymal stromal cells seeded on porous 3D silk fibroin scaffolds. ECM formation, ECM mineralization and cell differentiation in 3D tissue-engineered bone were analyzed using microscopic tools. Our results suggest that mechanical stimuli are necessary to differentiate human mesenchymal stromal cells of both bone marrow and adipose tissue origin into ECM producing osteoblasts which ultimately become ECM-embedded osteocytes. However, the influence of this stimulus seems to fade quickly after the onset of the culture. Constructs which were initially cultured under mechanical loading continued to deposit minerals at a similar growth rate once the mechanical stimulation was stopped. On the other hand, cell culture medium supplementation with FBS was identified as an extremely potent biochemical cue that influences the mechanosensitivity of the cells with regards to cell differentiation, ECM secretion and mineral deposition.

Only through a thorough understanding on these influences over time will we be able to predictably control tissue development in vitro.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 80 - 80
1 Mar 2021
van Gestel N Kleuskens M Wanders D Ito K Arts J van Rietbergen B Hofmann S
Full Access

Novel biomaterials are being developed and studied, intended to be applied as bone graft substitute materials. Typically, these materials are being tested in in vitro setups, where among others their cytotoxicity and alkaline phosphatase activity (as a marker for osteoblastic differentiation) are being evaluated. However, it has been reported that in vitro tests correlate poorly with in vivo results and therefore many promising biomaterials may not reach the clinic as a bone graft substitute product. One of the reasons for the poor correlation, may be the minimal complexity of the in vitro tests, as compared to the in vivo environment. Ex vivo models, mimicking the natural tissue environment whilst maintaining control of culture parameters, may be a promising alternative to assess biomaterials for bone formation. Assess the possibility of an ex vivo culture platform to test biomaterials on their potential to stimulate new bone formation. Osteochondral plugs (cylinders n=10, Ø 10 mm, height 15 mm) were drilled from fresh porcine knees, from the slaughterhouse. A bone defect (Ø 6 mm) was created and which was filled with a biomaterial graft (S53P4 bioactive glass (n=3); collagen sponges loaded with BMP-2 (n=3, as positive control)) or kept empty (n=4). The explants were cultured in custom-made two-chamber bioreactors for six weeks (LifeTec Group BV). Cartilage and bone were physically separated, similar to the in vivo situation, by a sealing ring. The two tissues were cultured in separate compartments, allowing for specific culture medium for each tissue. Medium was changed every 2–3 days and weekly micro computed tomography (µCT) images were obtained to longitudinally monitor the formation of new bone. An MTT assay was performed on half of the samples after six weeks of culture. The other samples were fixed for histology, to determine which cells were present after six weeks. The MTT metabolic assay showed that a number of cells in the bone were viable after six weeks. The further away from the border, the fewer living cells were observed. The cells in the cartilage also survived. No significant bone formation was observed with µCT in either of groups, even though abundant bone formation was expected in the BMP-2 group. Explanations of the negative results of the positive group might be that too few viable cells remain after six weeks, or that the cells that are still present are not able to form bone. No significant bone formation was observed in the bone defects in osteochondral explants that were cultured with, or without, biomaterials for six weeks. However, the platform showed that it is capable to successfully culture osteochondral explants for six weeks.

Histology needs to be performed to evaluate which cells were present at the end of the culture and this will be compared to the cells present directly after drilling the explants.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 47 - 47
1 Nov 2018
Hofmann S
Full Access

Bone tissue engineering has the intent to grow bone copies in the laboratory that could be used either for bone regeneration or as model systems to study bone physiology and pathology. Bone marrow- or adipose derived derived mesenchymal stromal cells are commonly used as they have been shown to be capable to differentiate into osteoblasts and depositing a calcium phosphate rich extracellular matrix. However, real bone is more than that: there are commonly three cell types described that are essential contributors to the tissue's native function: osteoblasts, osteocytes and osteoclasts. While all three cell types are being investigated separately, co-cultures of them including their precursors and inactive forms still provide a huge challenge these days, both in terms of culturing and (quantitative) evaluation. In addition, the matrix deposited by the osteoblasts in vitro is still far from bone's hierarchical organization in vivo that contributes to bone's impressive mechanical properties. Using a large set of microscopic tools (micro-computed tomography, SEM, 3D FIB/SEM, TEM and fluorescence), combined with spectroscopic (FTIR) and molecular tools (qPCR) we show that our 3D model system develops the main features of bone by human stromal cells differentiating first into osteoblasts who further embed themselves to become osteocytes. In their right environment and when stimulated mechanically, the cells are embedded within a collagenous matrix which is mineralized with carbonated hydroxyapatite. While this system still needs the addition of osteoclasts to represent ‘real’ bone, it allows to study the interaction between osteoblasts and osteocytes and to invest parameters contributing to collagen mineralization in high resolution and cryogenic conditions.