Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XVIII | Pages 25 - 25
1 May 2012
Savaridas T Gaston M Wallace R Salter D Simpson A
Full Access

Fractures repair by two mechanisms; direct fracture healing and indirect fracture healing via callus formation. Research concerning the effects of bisphosphonate on fracture repair has solely assessed indirect fracture healing. Patients with osteoporosis on bisphosphonates continue to sustain fragility fractures. A proportion of osteoporotic fractures require plate fixation. Bisphosphonates impair osteoclast activity and therefore, may adversely affect direct fracture healing that predominates with plate fixation.

Five skeletally mature Sprague-Dawley rats received daily subcutaneous injections of 1mg/kg Ibandronate (IBAN). Similarly, five control rats received saline (CONTROL). Three weeks following commencement of injections a tibial osteotomy was rigidly fixed with compression plating similar to that seen in routine clinical practice. Fracture healing was monitored with radiographs. Six weeks post plate fixation, animals were sacrificed. Radiographs were performed of the extricated tibiae following plate removal. The visibility of the osteotomy site was scored as totally visible, partially visible or absent as previously described. Mechanical testing was conducted on the healing osteotomies via 4-point bending.

Fractures healed without visible external callus. In the IBAN group three animals had totally visible osteotomy lines and two had partially visible osteotomy lines. The CONTROL group had three animals with absent osteotomy lines and two with partially visible osteotomy lines. The mean (±SD) stress at failure for the healing tibial osteotomies at 6 weeks was 28.8 (±23.97)MPa in the IBAN group and 37.4(±29.20) MPa in the CONTROL group (p=0.62)

Our results indicate that Ibandronate adversely affected direct fracture repair as demonstrated by the radiographic density of the fracture line. The strength of the repair was reduced but this did not reach statistical significance. Our results suggest that a sample size of 220 animals is required to detect a 15% difference (alpha 0.05, beta 0.2) which suggests the effect of bisphosphonates on direct fracture repair may be small.