The purpose of the present study is to determine the incidence, location and rate of VTE following routine mechanical, chemical prophylaxis in trauma/elective patients and to understand what factors are responsible for the continuing high frequency of thromboembolic complication despite the fact that low molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is now widely used for prophylaxis. All of the inpatients at the orthopaedics ward, Princess Alexandra Hospital (level one trauma centre, Brisbane) between the first May 2009 and 30th of April 2010 with the diagnosis of DVT/PE were included in this study. Patients were chosen based on the diagnosis of DVT with ultrasound or PE with CTPA during their admission in this period which was performed whenever clinical signs indicated DVT or PE. 64% of the included patients had DVT and 42% had PE which was developed during their admission. Included patients had a mean age ±SD age of 56years ± 23 years, 68% were men and 72% suffered trauma. The 18% of patients had previous history of PE or DVT. The incidence of VTE was significantly higher in men at ages between 20–40 .29% of the patients had ICU admission during their stay in hospital. 28%had spinal cord injury, 21%with head trauma, and 36%with multiple bone fractures. Most of the patients had lower limb injury or operation and just one patient was with isolated upper limb injury. The mean period of hospitalization for the included patients were 29 ± 19 days (range, 6–77). DVTs occurred 8 days ± 7 days(range, 1–31) post admission. PEs occurred 10 days ± 8 days (range, 3–30) after admission. Location of DVT was available for 14 patients: 9 (64%)lower and 6 (43 %)upper, with one(0.07%)having both. Twelve of 28 patients with VTE were started on prophylactic clexane (40mg once daily), and six patients were on heparin(5000 unit twice daily). All of the patients with PE had lower limb injury. Considering the number of orthopaedics ward patients during our study period our data show the incidence of VTE in one year is lower than that of literature and the common standard prophylaxis with early mechanical prophylaxis after admission and following pharmacological prophylaxis when it is safe has acceptable results.
Infection in orthopaedic surgery has a large impact on outcome. This study audits the use of a microbial sealant and the infection rate of a single surgeon’s practice over four institutions in an 18 month period. The aim is to demonstrate a reduction in infection rate with its use. A consecutive series of operative cases using a microbial sealant was compared with a similar number of cases prior to its introduction. A microbial sealant (n-butyl compare cup placement using imageless navigation to a historical control group cyanoacrylate) is used to bond to skin pre-operatively therefore immobilizing bacteria. This would reduce intra-operative wound contamination from skin flora. The criteria for surgical site infection was taken from the guideline for prevention of surgical site infection (1999) form the National Centre for Infectious Diseases. Over an 18 month period 624 consecutive operative cases where a microbial sealant was used was reviewed. This was compared with a similar cohort of cases prior to the introduction of the microbial sealant. The case load included hip and knee arthroplasty, osteotomies of the knee, knee ligament reconstruction and surgery for neck of femur fractures. Three deep and two superficial wound infections were found in the sealant group use compared with four deep and three superficial infections in the non sealant group use. The numbers available did not allow statistical evaluation over a trend of infection reduction is noted. A microbial sealant is intended to be applied on skin after standard surgical skin preparation. The results obtained in this single surgeon’s surgical case audit demonstrate a tendency for infection reduction, however a larger series is required for statistical significance.
The results of the first 20 consecutive patients have been compared with 20 standard TKR procedures. The mean age of 73.5 and BMI of 29 was not significantly different to the standard Group. Mean hospital stay was approximately halved (5 days versus 9 days). 75% of patients were discharged on day 4 without needing extra home support. Mean incision length was 13.5cm and only one of 20 required blood transfusion. Mean operative time was 12 minutes longer and post-operative CT alignment showed no mal-position of the implants.
