Distal radius fractures (DRF) are a common injury in the A&E departments, being a major cause of disability of the upper extremity. The aim of this prospective study is to assess the possible association between objective physical variables such as wrist range of movement (ROM), radiological parameters, and upper extremity disability (measured by the DASH questionnaire), after conservative treatment of DRF. 44 patients with non-operatively managed DRF were enrolled in a prospective cohort study from July 2007 till September 2009. Inclusion criteria: unilateral DRF in skeletally mature patients, treated non-operatively with closed reduction and cast. Patients who sustained a previous fracture of the wrist, or bilateral wrist fracture, or with dementia, were excluded. After the closed reduction and inmovilization of the fracture in the A&E department we asked the patients to complete the DASH questionnaire, referring to their baseline pre-fracture state. All fractures were classified according to the AO classification. After one year, 36 patients were still available for follow-up purposes. We assesed the following objective physical variables: ROM of both wrists: flexion/extension arc and pronation/supination arch. We recorded the following radiologic parameters: radial angulation, volar angulation and radial shortening. The patient-perceived results were measured by the DASH questionnaire, while pain was measured using the VAS scale. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 15.0.Introduction
Patients and methods
There are no statistical differences for metatarsal curve. According to AOFAS scale there are no differences except for the alineation items (better in group O). No differences neither for global satisfaction of the patients nor for visual analogic scale. Complications are predictable for each technique: skin problems in group O and union problems in group P. We conclude that both procedures are acceptable in the treatment of metatarsalgia with similar objective and subjective results.
