Aims. The volume of ambulatory total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures is increasing due to the emphasis on value-based care. The purpose of the study is to identify the causes for failed same-day discharge (SDD) and perioperative factors leading to failed SDD. Methods. This retrospective cohort study followed pre-selected patients for SDD THA from 1 August 2018 to 31 December 2020. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing unilateral THA with appropriate social support, age 18 to 75 years, and BMI < 37 kg/m. 2. Patients with opioid dependence, coronary artery disease, and valvular heart disease were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative data were collected from the electronic medical records. Possible risk factors for failed SDD were identified using multivariate logistic regression. Results. In all, 278 patients were identified with a mean age of 57.1 years (SD 8.1) and a mean BMI of 27.3 kg/m. 2. (SD 4.5). A total of 96 patients failed SDD, with the most common reasons being failure to clear physical therapy (26%), dizziness (22%), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (11%). Risk factors associated with failed SDD included smokers (odds ratio (OR) 6.24; p = 0.009), a maximum postoperative pain score > 8 (OR 4.76; p = 0.004), and procedures starting after 11 am (OR 2.28; p = 0.015). A higher postoperative tolerable pain goal (numerical rating scale 4 to 10) was found to be associated with successful SDD (OR 2.7; p = 0.001). Age, BMI, surgical approach, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, and anaesthesia type were not associated with failed SDD. Conclusion. SDD is a safe and viable option for pre-selected patients interested in rapid recovery THA. The most common causes for failure to launch were failing to clear physical thereapy and patient symptomatology. Risk factors associated with failed SSD highlight the importance of preoperative counselling regarding smoking cessation and postoperative pain to set reasonable expectations. Future interventions should aim to improve patient postoperative mobilization, pain control, and decrease symptomatology. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(9):684–691

The direct superior approach (DSA) is a modification of the posterior approach (PA) that preserves the iliotibial band and short external rotators except for the piriformis or conjoined tendon during total hip arthroplasty (THA). The objective of this study was to compare postoperative pain, early functional rehabilitation, functional outcomes, implant positioning, implant migration, and complications in patients undergoing the DSA versus PA for THA. This study included 80 patients with symptomatic hip arthritis undergoing primary THA. Patients were prospectively randomised to receive either the DSA or PA for THA, surgery was undertaken using identical implant designs in both groups, and all patients received a standardized postoperative rehabilitation programme. Predefined study outcomes were recorded by blinded observers at regular intervals for two-years after THA. Radiosteriometric analysis (RSA) was used to assess implant migration. There were no statistical differences between the DSA and PA in postoperative pain scores (p=0.312), opiate analgesia consumption (p=0.067), and time to hospital discharge (p=0.416). At two years follow-up, both groups had comparable Oxford hip scores (p=0.476); Harris hip scores (p=0.293); Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome scores (p=0.543); University of California at Los Angeles scores (p=0.609); Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (p=0.833); and European Quality of Life questionnaire with 5 dimensions scores (p=0.418). Radiographic analysis revealed no difference between the two treatment groups for overall accuracy of acetabular cup positioning (p=0.687) and femoral stem alignment (p=0.564). RSA revealed no difference in femoral component migration (p=0.145) between the groups at two years follow-up. There were no differences between patients undergoing the DSA versus PA for THA with respect to postoperative pain scores, functional rehabilitation, patient-reported outcome measurements, accuracy of implant positioning, and implant migration at two years follow-up. Both treatment groups had excellent outcomes that remained comparable at all follow-up intervals

Aims. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) as part of a periarticular injection protocol continues to be a highly debated topic in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We evaluated the effect of discontinuing the use of LB in a periarticular protocol on immediate postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and objective functional outcomes. Methods. On 1 July 2019, we discontinued the use of intraoperative LB as part of a periarticular injection protocol. A consecutive group of patients who received LB as part of the protocol (Protocol 1) and a subsequent group who did not (Protocol 2) were compared. All patients received the same opioid-sparing protocol. Verbal rating scale (VRS) pain scores were collected from our electronic data warehouse and averaged per patient per 12-hour interval. Events relating to the opiate administration were derived as morphine milligram equivalences (MMEs) per patient per 24-hour interval. The Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) tool was used to assess the immediate postoperative function. Results. A total of 888 patients received Protocol 1 and while 789 received Protocol 2. The mean age of the patients was significantly higher in those who did not receive LB (66.80 vs 65.57 years, p = 0.006). The sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score, race, smoking status, marital status, operating time, length of stay, and discharge disposition were similar in the two groups. Compared with the LB group, discontinuing LB showed no significant difference in postoperative VRS pain scores up to 72 hours (p > 0.05), opioid administration up to 96 hours (p > 0.05), or AM-PAC scores within the first 24 hours (p > 0.05). Conclusion. The control of pain after TKA with a multimodal management protocol is not improved by the addition of LB compared with traditional bupivacaine. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):102–107

Abstract. Introduction. Adverse reactions to pain medication and pain can delay discharge after outpatient knee arthroplasty (TKA). Pharmacogenomics is an emerging tool that might help reduce adverse events by tailoring medication use based on known genetic variations in the CYP genes determining drug metabolism. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether pre-operative pharmacogenomic testing could optimize peri-operative pain management in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. This prospective, randomized study was performed in adults undergoing primary TKA. Patients in the experimental group underwent pre-operative pharmacogenomic evaluation and medication adjustments. Medications were not optimized for control patients. The Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS) at 24 hours post-op was the primary outcome. Postoperative pain scores (VAS scale), total opioid use, time in recovery, and time to discharge were also compared. Results. 76 patients enrolled. 93% of patients had a poor-intermediate phenotype for at least one of four CYP genes. OBAS did not differ significantly between the two groups (4.2 control vs. 4.7 experimental; 95% CI −1.1 to 2.1) and was below the minimum clinically important difference of 2.0 points. Furthermore, there were no differences in any OBAS subscale including pain, satisfaction, or nausea. There were no differences in time in the recovery area or to discharge from hospital, or narcotic use. Conclusions. Despite many patients having a poor-intermediate phenotype for a CYP gene, pharmacogenomic testing prior to TKA and medication adjustment did not improve anesthesia or pain management outcomes, time to discharge or mean total opioid use after surgery

Introduction. Day stay surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions is an increasingly common practice and has driven clinicians to come up with postoperative pain regimes that allow same day mobilisation and a safe and timely discharge. There is a paucity of literature surrounding the use of intraosseous (IO) ropivacaine used as a Bier's block to provide both intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in lower limb surgery. Methods. This patient blinded, pilot study randomised 15 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction to receive either IO ropivacaine 1.5 or 2.0 mg/kg; or 300 mg of ropivacaine as local infiltration (standard of care). Toxic plasma levels of ropivacaine have been defined in the literature and therefore the primary outcome for this study was arterial plasma concentration of ropivacaine as a means to determine its safety profile. Samples were taken via an arterial line at prespecified times after tourniquet deflation. Secondary outcomes that we were interested in included immediate postoperative pain scores using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and perioperative opioid equivalent consumption. Results. Participants had a mean age of 27.8 (SD 9.2) years and 87% (13/15) were male. All patients in the intervention group receiving IO ropivacaine had plasma concentrations well below the threshold for central nervous system (CNS) toxicity (0.60 µg/ml). The highest plasma concentration was achieved in the intervention group receiving 1.5 mg/kg dose of ropivacaine reaching 3.59 mg/ml. This would equate to 0.22 µg/ml of free plasma ropivacaine. There were no differences across the three groups regarding pain scores or perioperative opioid consumption. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that IO administration of 0.2% ropivacaine is both safe and effective in reducing perioperative pain in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. There may be scope to increase the IO dose further or utilise other analgesics via the IO regional route to improve perioperative pain relief

Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioids than any other surgical speciality. Opioids remain the analgesic of choice following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery. There is growing evidence that opioid-sparing protocols may reduce postoperative opioid consumption while adequately addressing patients’ pain. However, there are a lack of prospective, comparative trials evaluating their effectiveness. The objective of the current randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal, opioid-sparing approach to postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgery. The NO PAin trial is a pragmatic, definitive RCT (NCT04566250) enrolling 200 adult patients undergoing outpatient shoulder or knee arthroscopy. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an opioid-sparing group or standard of care. The opioid-sparing group receives a three-pronged prescription package consisting of 1) a non-opioid prescription: naproxen, acetaminophen and pantoprazole, 2) a limited opioid “rescue prescription” of hydromorphone, and 3) a patient education infographic. The control group is the current standard of care as per the treating surgeon, which consists of an opioid analgesic. The primary outcome of interest is oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption up to 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, quantity of OMEs prescribed and number of opioid refills. Patients are followed at both 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Data analysts and outcome assessors are blinded to the treatment groups. As of December 1, 2021 we have enrolled 166 patients, reaching 83% of target enrolment. Based on the current recruitment rate, we anticipate that enrolment will be completed by the end of January 2022 with final follow-up and study close out completed by March of 2022. The final results will be released at the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Meeting in June 2022 and be presented as follows. The mean difference in OME consumption was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in OMEs prescribed was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction are XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The absolute difference in opioid refills was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The results of the current study will demonstrate whether an opioid sparing approach to postoperative outpatient pain management is effective at reducing opioid consumption while adequately addressing postoperative pain in patients undergoing outpatient shoulder and knee arthroscopy. This study is novel in the field of arthroscopic surgery, and its results will help to guide appropriate postoperative analgesic management following these widely performed procedures

Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioids than any other surgical speciality. Opioids remain the analgesic of choice following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery. There is growing evidence that opioid-sparing protocols may reduce postoperative opioid consumption while adequately addressing patients’ pain. However, there are a lack of prospective, comparative trials evaluating their effectiveness. The objective of the current randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal, opioid-sparing approach to postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgery. The NO PAin trial is a pragmatic, definitive RCT (NCT04566250) enrolling 200 adult patients undergoing outpatient shoulder or knee arthroscopy. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an opioid-sparing group or standard of care. The opioid-sparing group receives a three-pronged prescription package consisting of 1) a non-opioid prescription: naproxen, acetaminophen and pantoprazole, 2) a limited opioid “rescue prescription” of hydromorphone, and 3) a patient education infographic. The control group is the current standard of care as per the treating surgeon, which consists of an opioid analgesic. The primary outcome of interest is oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption up to 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, quantity of OMEs prescribed and number of opioid refills. Patients are followed at both 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Data analysts and outcome assessors are blinded to the treatment groups. As of December 1, 2021 we have enrolled 166 patients, reaching 83% of target enrolment. Based on the current recruitment rate, we anticipate that enrolment will be completed by the end of January 2022 with final follow-up and study close out completed by March of 2022. The final results will be released at the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Meeting in June 2022 and be presented as follows. The mean difference in OME consumption was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in OMEs prescribed was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction are XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The absolute difference in opioid refills was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The results of the current study will demonstrate whether an opioid sparing approach to postoperative outpatient pain management is effective at reducing opioid consumption while adequately addressing postoperative pain in patients undergoing outpatient shoulder and knee arthroscopy. This study is novel in the field of arthroscopic surgery, and its results will help to guide appropriate postoperative analgesic management following these widely performed procedures

Introduction. Prosthetic designs that use porous metals possess an extremely high surface area and through capillary effect may potentially ‘absorb’ and later elute analgesic solution, serving as a surgical site drug depot. This study aimed to determine if a highly porous acetabular component submerged in an aqueous-based analgesic solution prior to implantation reduced postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in the early post-operative period. Methods. Using our IRB approved database, 200 consecutive opioid naïve primary THA patients operated on by a single surgeon at two institutions using the same acetabular component were identified. 100 patients had a standard volume/concentration of an analgesic cocktail soft-tissue injection at closure (control). 100 patients had their acetabular components submerged into the same cocktail prior to implantation (treatment) and the balance of the volume injected. Postoperative protocols were otherwise identical. Groups were compared for visual analog pain scores (VAS), opioid consumption, 1-year radiographic findings and surgical revision rates. Results. VAS were lower in the treatment group at 6hrs (2.35±1.8 v. 3.31±2.3, p<0.01), 12hrs (2.00±1.6 v. 3.61±2.3, p<0.01), 18hrs (2.36±1.7 v. 3.44±1.9, p<0.01), and 24 hrs (2.20±1.6 v. 3.82±1.9, p<0.01). Opioid consumption was lower in the treatment group at all time point in the first 24 hours and significantly lower in the first 6 hours (7.18±9.42 MME v. 10.76±11.37 MME, p<0.05) and between 12 and 24 hours postoperatively (10.43±15.94 MME v. 17.08±22.75 MME, p<0.05). The total MME administered to the treatment group was significantly lower than the control group (48.3±59.7 MME vs. 76.1±78.6 MME, respectively; p<0.01). At one-year, there was no radiographic evidence of periacetabular lucencies and no revisions for loosening. Conclusion. The use of a highly porous component commonly used in THA as a potential analgesic drug depot in combination with soft-tissue injections may reduce postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption compared to soft-tissue injections alone

A tourniquet is usually used during ankle arthroscopy to allow for improved visibility and reduced operation time. However, clinical studies on knee arthroscopy have not demonstrated this to be true. In addition, Zengerink and van Dijk emphasized a limited tourniquet time in ankle arthroscopy as a possible factor to lower the complication rate even more. The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to examine the effect of tourniquet use on arthroscopic visualization, operative time, postoperative intra-articular bleeding, postoperative pain scores and outcome of anterior ankle arthroscopy. A consecutive series of 50 patients who were scheduled for anterior ankle arthroscopy were randomized to have the surgery done either without the tourniquet inflated (25 patients) or with the tourniquet inflated (25 patients). The patients were evaluated by the course of the surgery, postoperative intra-articular bleeding, pain during the early postoperative period and by using the subjective and objective functional scores to evaluate the condition of the ankle before and 3 and 6 months after the surgery. The statistical analysis was performed with the normality of distribution tested by both Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Appropriate parametric or non-parametric methods were then used to test statistical hypotheses, while the statistical significance (alpha, Type I error) was set at .05. Fourty-nine patients were present at the final follow-up, 6 months after the surgery. The results between the groups were comparable regarding the duration of the operative procedure, consumption of sterile saline, visualisation and functional scores. Notable difference between the groups in favour of the non-tourniquet group was present regarding postoperative bleeding, but was not statistically significant. Statistically significant difference in favour of the non-tourniquet group was found regarding postoperative pain during several days in the early postoperative period. Our study has shown that anterior ankle arthroscopy may be performed adequately without the use of a tourniquet and that it has the same operative course as in cases in which the tourniquet is used and functional outcomes which are not worse than in cases in which the tourniquet is used

Introduction. The use of intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine (LB) peri-articular injection has been highly debated for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We evaluated the effect of an institutional-wide discontinuation of intraoperative LB on immediate postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and objective functional outcomes. Material and Methods. Between July 1, 2019 and November 30, 2019, an institutional policy discontinued use of intraoperative LB, while the volume of non-LB with epinephrine was increased from 40-ml to 60-ml. A historical cohort was derived from patients undergoing TKA between January 1, 2019 and June 30, 2019. All patients received the same opioid sparing protocol, minimizing variability in prescribing habits. No adductor canal blocks/pumps were utilized. Nursing documented verbal rating scale (VRS) pain scores were collected from our electronic data warehouse and averaged per patient per 12-hour interval. Opiate administration events were derived as Morphine Milligram Equivalences (MMEs) per patient per 24-hour interval. To assess immediate postoperative functional status, the validated Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) tool was utilized. All time events were calculated relative to TKA completion instant. Results. 789 primary TKAs did not receive intraoperative LB, while 888 patients acted as controls. Age was significantly greater in patients that did not receive intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine (66.80±8.97 vs 65.57±9.46; p<.01). Gender, BMI, ASA physical status score, race, smoking status, marital status, surgical time, length of stay and discharge disposition were similar between the two groups (p>.05). Compared to historical controls, discontinuation of LB demonstrated no significant difference in postoperative inpatient VRS pain scores up to 72 hours (p>.05), opioid administration up to 96 hours (p>.05), or AM-PAC scores within the first 24 hours (p>.05). Discussion. Subjective pain scores, opioid consumption, and functional scores were unchanged in the early postoperative period following the discontinuation of intraoperative liposomal delivery of bupivacaine in TKA

Aims. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical, radiological, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the first 100 consecutive patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) via a direct superior approach (DSA) with a matched group of patients undergoing THA by the same surgeon, using a posterolateral approach (PLA). Methods. This was a retrospective single surgeon study comparing the first 100 consecutive DSA THA patients with a matched group of patients using a standard PLA. Case notes were examined for patient demographics, length of hospital stay, operating time, intra- and postoperative complications, pain score, satisfaction score, and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Leg length discrepancy and component positioning were measured from postoperative plain radiographs. Results. The DSA patients had a shorter length of hospital stay (mean 2.09 days (SD 1.20) DSA vs 2.74 days (SD 1.17) PLA; p < 0.001) and shorter time to discharge from the inpatient physiotherapy teams (mean 1.44 days (SD 1.17) DSA vs 1.93 days (SD 0.96) PLA; p < 0.001). There were no differences in operating time (p = 0.505), pain levels up to postoperative day 1 (p = 0.106 to p =0.242), OHS (p = 0.594 to p = 0.815), satisfaction levels (p = 0.066 to p = 0.299), stem alignment (p = 0.240), acetabular component inclination (p < 0.001) and anteversion (p < 0.001), or leg length discrepancy (p = 0.134). Conclusion. While the DSA appears safe and was not associated with a significant difference in PROMs, radiological findings, or intraoperative or postoperative complications, a randomized controlled trial with functional outcomes in the postoperative phase is needed to evaluate this surgical approach formally. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):500–506

Aims. The objectives of this study were to compare postoperative pain, analgesia requirements, inpatient functional rehabilitation, time to hospital discharge, and complications in patients undergoing conventional jig-based unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) versus robotic-arm assisted UKA. Patients and Methods. This prospective cohort study included 146 patients with symptomatic medial compartment knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary UKA performed by a single surgeon. This included 73 consecutive patients undergoing conventional jig-based mobile bearing UKA, followed by 73 consecutive patients receiving robotic-arm assisted fixed bearing UKA. All surgical procedures were performed using the standard medial parapatellar approach for UKA, and all patients underwent the same postoperative rehabilitation programme. Postoperative pain scores on the numerical rating scale and opiate analgesia consumption were recorded until discharge. Time to attainment of predefined functional rehabilitation outcomes, hospital discharge, and postoperative complications were recorded by independent observers. Results. Robotic-arm assisted UKA was associated with reduced postoperative pain (p < 0.001), decreased opiate analgesia requirements (p < 0.001), shorter time to straight leg raise (p < 0.001), decreased number of physiotherapy sessions (p < 0.001), and increased maximum knee flexion at discharge (p < 0.001) compared with conventional jig-based UKA. Mean time to hospital discharge was reduced in robotic UKA compared with conventional UKA (42.5 hours (. sd 5.9). vs 71.1 hours (. sd. 14.6), respectively; p < 0.001). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two groups within 90 days’ follow-up. Conclusion. Robotic-arm assisted UKA was associated with decreased postoperative pain, reduced opiate analgesia requirements, improved early functional rehabilitation, and shorter time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based UKA

Intrathecal morphine (IM) is a common adjunct in paediatric spinal deformity surgery. We previously demonstrated with idiopathic scoliosis it provides safe and effective analgesia in the immediate postoperative period. This study represents our 25 year experience with IM in all diagnostic groups. Our prospective Pediatric Orthopaedic Spine Database (1993–2018) was reviewed to identify all patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery who received IM and who did not. Patients 21 years of age or less who had a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with segmental spinal instrumentation (SSI), and received 9–19 mcg/kg (up to 1 mg) of IM were included. Early onset scoliosis surgical patients were excluded. We assessed demographics, pain scores, time to first dose of opioids, diagnoses, surgical time, paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission and IM complications (respiratory depression, pruritus, nausea/ vomiting). There were 986 patients who met inclusion criteria. This included 760 patients who received IM and 226 who did not. IM was not used for short procedures (< 3 hrs), respiratory concerns, unsuccessful access of intrathecal space, paraplegia, and anesthesiologist decision. Both groups followed the same strict perioperative care path. The patients were divided into 5 diagnostic groups (IM / non IM patients): idiopathic (578/28), neuromuscular (100/151), syndromic (36/17), and congenital scoliosis (32/21) and kyphosis (14/9). Females predominated over males (697/289). The first dose of opioids after surgery was delayed for a mean of 10.6 hrs in IM group compared to 2.3 hrs in the non-IM group (p=0.001). The postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the IM groups in the Post Anesthesia Care Unite (p=0.001). Only 17 IM patients (2%) were admitted to the PICU for observation secondary to respiratory depression, none required re-intubation. None of the IM group were re-intubated. Forty-nine patients (6%) experienced pruritus in the IM group compared to 4 of 226 patients (2%) in the non IM group. There were 169 patients (22%) of the IM patients and 21 patients (9%) of the non IM had nausea and vomiting postoperatively. Three patients (0.39%) had a dural leak from the administration of IM but did not require surgical repair. There were no other perioperative complications related to the use of IM. There were no significant group differences. Pre-incision IM is a safe and effective adjunct for pain management in all diagnostic groups undergoing spinal surgery. The IM patients had lower pain scores and a longer time to first administration of post-operative opioids. Although there is an increased frequency of respiratory depression, pruritus, and nausea/vomiting in the IM group, there were no serious complications

The use of tourniquet in lower limb orthopaedic surgery is well established, however, it does have associated risks and complications and its use has been previously questioned. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirements and time to discharge in patients undergoing tourniquet assisted and non-tourniquet assisted routine knee arthroscopy. A total of 40 patients were randomised to tourniquet assisted and non-tourniquet assisted groups. Arthroscopy was performed using a standardised local anaesthetic infiltration in the non-tourniquet assisted group. All patients completed a postoperative pain score. Findings demonstrated that the incidence and mean scores for postoperative pain were significantly lower in the non-tourniquet group. Additionally postoperative analgesic requirements of patients in the non-tourniquet group were also found to be significantly lower and time spent in recovery and on the ward postoperatively was also lower in the non-tourniquet group compared to the tourniquet group. On the basis of the results in our study we recommend abolishing the use of tourniquet in routine knee arthroscopies in the virgin knee

Aims. This study aimed to determine the minimal detectable change (MDC), minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) under distribution- and anchor-based methods for the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and range of movement (ROM) after open elbow arthrolysis (OEA). We also assessed the proportion of patients who achieved MCID and SCB; and identified the factors associated with achieving MCID. Methods. A cohort of 265 patients treated by OEA were included. The MEPI and ROM were evaluated at baseline and at two-year follow-up. Distribution-based MDC was calculated with confidence intervals (CIs) reflecting 80% (MDC 80), 90% (MDC 90), and 95% (MDC 95) certainty, and MCID with changes from baseline to follow-up. Anchor-based MCID (anchored to somewhat satisfied) and SCB (very satisfied) were calculated using a five-level Likert satisfaction scale. Multivariate logistic regression of factors affecting MCID achievement was performed. Results. The MDC increased substantially based on selected CIs (MDC 80, MDC 90, and MDC 95), ranging from 5.0 to 7.6 points for the MEPI, and from 8.2° to 12.5° for ROM. The MCID of the MEPI were 8.3 points under distribution-based and 12.2 points under anchor-based methods; distribution- and anchor-based MCID of ROM were 14.1° and 25.0°. The SCB of the MEPI and ROM were 17.3 points and 43.4°, respectively. The proportion of the patients who attained anchor-based MCID for the MEPI and ROM were 74.0% and 94.7%, respectively; furthermore, 64.2% and 86.8% attained SCB. Non-dominant arm (p = 0.022), higher preoperative MEPI rating (p < 0.001), and postoperative visual analogue scale pain score (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of not achieving MCID for the MEPI, while atraumatic causes (p = 0.040) and higher preoperative ROM (p = 0.005) were independent risk factors for ROM. Conclusion. In patients undergoing OEA, the MCID for the increased MEPI is 12.2 points and 25° increased ROM. The SCB is 17.3 points and 43.3°, respectively. Future studies using the MEPI and ROM to assess OEA outcomes should report not only statistical significance but also clinical importance. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):366–372

Aims. No randomized comparative study has compared the extensile lateral approach (ELA) and sinus tarsi approach (STA) for Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures. This randomized comparative study was conducted to confirm whether the STA was prone to fewer wound complications than the ELA. Methods. Between August 2013 and August 2018, 64 patients with Sanders type 2 calcaneus fractures were randomly assigned to receive surgical treatment by the ELA (32 patients) and STA (32 patients). The primary outcome was development of wound complications. The secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, pain scored of a visual analogue scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, 36-item Short Form health survey, operative duration, subtalar joint range of motion (ROM), Böhler’s angle and calcaneal width, and posterior facet reduction. Results. Although four patients (12.5%) in the ELA groups and none in the STA group experienced complications, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.113). VAS and AOFAS score were significantly better in the STA group than in the ELA group at six months (p = 0.017 and p = 0.021), but not at 12 months (p = 0.096 and p = 0.200) after surgery. The operation time was significantly shorter in the STA group than in the ELA group (p < 0.001). The subtalar joint ROM was significantly better in the STA group (p = 0.015). Assessment of the amount of postoperative reduction compared with the uninjured limb showed significant restoration of calcaneal width in the ELA group compared with that in the STA group (p < 0.001). Conclusion. The ELA group showed higher frequency of wound complications than the STA group for Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures even though this was not statistically significant. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):286–293

The February 2024 Wrist & Hand Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Occupational therapy for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis?; Age and patient-reported benefits from operative management of intra-articular distal radius fractures: a meta-regression analysis; Long-term outcomes of nonsurgical treatment of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a cohort study; Semi-occlusive dressing versus surgery in fingertip injuries: a randomized controlled trial; Re-fracture in partial union of the scaphoid waist?; The WALANT distal radius fracture: a systematic review; Endoscopic carpal tunnel release with or without hand therapy?; Ten-year trends in the level of evidence in hand surgery.

Introduction: Achilles tendinopathy (AT) is the most common over use syndrome of the lower limb. One of the simple operations performed for this condition is “Multiple longitudinal tenotomies”. This can be performed by either percutaneous or open methods. We compared the outcome of percutaneous versus open method of multiple longitudinal tenotomies for this condition. Methods and materials: It is a retrospective study of patients operated for AT in our hospital from 1997 to 2008. Total of 43 patients. Twenty had percutaneous and 23 had open tenotomies. All of them had a trial of non-operative treatment prior to surgery, in the form of analgesia, physiotherapy, heel inserts, and ultrasound therapy. Data was collected from patient records and by telephonic questionnaire of the patients. Data collected includes pre and postoperative pain scores on a scale of 0–10, duration of symptoms, patient satisfaction scores (0–10) and complications. This questionnaire also included limitation to walk, run, going up/down the stairs, work and sporting activities. Results: In the percutaneous group the mean pre and postoperative pain scores were 8.79 and 2.07 (p value 0.000). In the open group the values were 8.65 and 1.75 (p value 0.000). The mean satisfaction scores in the percutaneous and open groups were 8.25 (range 3–10) and 8.14(range2–10) respectively. The patient satisfaction scores were not significantly different between the two groups (p value 0.942). In the percutaneous group there was one recurrence and in one patient there was no symptomatic relief. In the open group there were 2 superficial infections, which settled with antibiotics and a wound breakdown, which in addition required debridement and eventually healed by secondary intension. Conclusions: Both percutaneous and open methods of longitudinal tenotomies resulted in significant symptomatic relief and good patient satisfaction scores. Although the outcomes of both groups were comparable the percutanous method has an added advantage of less complications and simplicity of the procedure

Aims

Factors associated with high mortality rates in geriatric hip fracture patients are frequently unmodifiable. Time to surgery, however, might be a modifiable factor of interest to optimize clinical outcomes after hip fracture surgery. This study aims to determine the influence of postponement of surgery due to non-medical reasons on clinical outcomes in acute hip fracture surgery.

The June 2023 Spine Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Characteristics and comparative study of thoracolumbar spine injury and dislocation fracture due to tertiary trauma; Sublingual sufentanil for postoperative pain management after lumbar spinal fusion surgery; Minimally invasive bipolar technique for adult neuromuscular scoliosis; Predictive factors for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis; Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and lumbar fusion surgery at level L4/5; Does recall of preoperative scores contaminate trial outcomes? A randomized controlled trial; Vancomycin in fibrin glue for prevention of SSI; Perioperative nutritional supplementation decreases wound healing complications following elective lumbar spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

The December 2023 Foot & Ankle Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Subchondral bone cysts remodel after correction of varus deformity in ankle arthritis; 3D-printed modular endoprosthesis reconstruction following total calcanectomy; Percutaneous partial bone excision in the management of diabetic toe osteomyelitis; Hemiepiphysiodesis is a viable surgical option for Juvenile hallux valgus; Ankle arthroplasty vs arthrodesis: which comes out on top?; Patient-related risk factors for poorer outcome following total ankle arthroplasty; The Outcomes in Ankle Replacement Study.

Aims

Despite new technologies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), approximately 20% of patients are dissatisfied. A major reason for dissatisfaction and revision surgery after TKA is persistent pain. The radiological grade of osteoarthritis (OA) preoperatively has been investigated as a predictor of the outcome after TKA, with conflicting results. The aim of this study was to determine if there is a difference in the intensity of pain 12 months after TKA in relation to the preoperative radiological grade of OA alone, and the combination of the intensity of preoperative pain and radiological grade of OA.

Aims

In-hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge dispositions following arthroplasty could act as surrogate measures for improvement in patient pathways, and have major cost saving implications for healthcare providers. With the ever-growing adoption of robotic technology in arthroplasty, it is imperative to evaluate its impact on LOS. The objectives of this study were to compare LOS and discharge dispositions following robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RO TKA) and unicompartmental arthroplasty (RO UKA) versus conventional technique (CO TKA and UKA).

Aim: To assess the efficiency of pre-emptive analgesia in a clinical setting as opposed to closely controlled animal models, looking at postoperative pain scores, total analgesia requirement and amount of general anaesthetic agent required during surgery. Methods and Results. Subject to exclusions, 40 patients undergoing day-case arthroscopy of the knee (mean age 44 years, ASA grade 1–2) were randomized into two treatment groups. All patients had general anaesthesia. The trial group received an injection of 15mI 0.5% Bupivicaine / 1/200,000 adrenaline pre-emptively. After surgery a placebo injection was given of 15ml normal saline in an identical manner. The control group received the opposite order. Additional post-operative analgesia, if required, was administered in recovery. This was recorded, also total dose of propofol used, time to awakening, visual analogue pain score at 15 / 30 / 60 minutes, postoperative nausea and vomiting at 30 minutes and the number of delayed discharges. Although no difference was observed in postoperative pain scores at 15, 30 or 60 minutes, a trend for the trial group to require less analgesia in recovery was observed (Chi squared =9.74, p=0. 1) but this was not statistically significant. There was no difference in mean dose of propofol used in either group, 15mg/kg/hr (. sd. =2.85) trial versus 14.6mg/kg/hr (. sd. =1.96) control. Conclusion: Local anaesthetic given pre-emptively appears to be no more effective at controlling pain in the immediate postoperative period than the current standard practice of postoperative injection. It’s effect in clinical practice may be less dramatic than that observed in more controlled animal models and a larger study may be required to show a statistically significant difference

Background. Hip arthroplasties are associated with high postoperative pain scores. In some reports, moderate to severe pain was 58% on the first day postoperatively in total hip replacements (THRs). Several techniques are currently used at our institution to tackle acute pain following THRs. These include: 1) Spinal anaesthetic (SA) with Diamorphine only; 2) General anaesthetic (GA) only; 3) SA with local infiltration anaesthetic mixture 1 (LIA1,). Mixture 1 consisted of ropivacaine, adrenaline, and ketorolac; 4) SA with LIA mixture 2 (LIA2). Mixture 2 consisted of bupivacaine and adrenaline; 5) SA with LIA1 and PainKwell pump system. In this study we report on the techniques of acute pain control following THR at our regional centre for elective primary THRs. Methods. Between June 2011 and July 2014, 173 consecutive patients undergoing primary THR using the posterior approach were prospectively followed up. Group 1. GA only. 31 patients, Group 2. SA only. 37 patients, Group 3. SA plus LIA1 only. 38 patients, Group 4. SA plus LIA2 only, 34 patients, Group 5. SA plus LIA1 plus PainKwell Pump System for 48 hours. 33 patients. Results. Fewer patients required opiate analgesia when LIA plus PainKwell pump system was used compared to the other groups. The highest significance was at 0–12 hrs for patients requiring up to 20mg morphine usage (χ2(2) = 46.713, p = 0.000); and 0–12hrs for patients requiring 30mg morphine usage (χ2(2) = 46.310, p = 0.000). There were no infections, DVTs or PEs in any group. One patient in group 3 suffered a stroke (ASA 4). A Kruskal-Wallis H test also showed that there was a statistically significant difference in morphine usage across groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Conclusion. We recommend the use of LIA with PainKwell pump system continuous infusion as an efficacious method to control pain following THR

There has been a marked increase in the number of hip arthroscopies performed over the past 16 years, primarily in the management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Insights into the pathoanatomy of FAI, and high-level evidence supporting the clinical effectiveness of arthroscopy in the management of FAI, have fuelled this trend. Arthroscopic management of labral tears with repair may have superior results compared with debridement, and there is now emerging evidence to support reconstructive options where repair is not possible. In situations where an interportal capsulotomy is performed to facilitate access, data now support closure of the capsule in selective cases where there is an increased risk of postoperative instability. Preoperative planning is an integral component of bony corrective surgery in FAI, and this has evolved to include computer-planned resection. However, the benefit of this remains controversial. Hip instability is now widely accepted, and diagnostic criteria and treatment are becoming increasingly refined. Instability can also be present with FAI or develop as a result of FAI treatment. In this annotation, we outline major current controversies relating to decision-making in hip arthroscopy for FAI.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):532–540.

The unparalleled events of the year 2020 continue to evolve and challenge the worldwide community on a daily basis. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on all aspects of our lives, and has caused major morbidity and mortality around the globe. The impact of COVID-19 on the practice of orthopedic surgery has been substantial with practice shutdowns, elective surgery restrictions, heightened utilization of telemedicine platforms and implementation of precautionary measures for in-person clinic visits. During this transition period the scholarly and educational pursuits of academic surgeons have been de-emphasized as the more immediate demands of clinical practice survivorship have been the priority. This unavoidable focus on clinical practice has heightened the importance of orthopedic subspecialty societies in maintaining an appropriate level of attention on research and educational activities. Under the outstanding presidential leadership of Robert Barrack, MD, The Hip Society adapted to the profound challenges of 2020, and maintained strong leadership in the realms of education and research. The recent 2020 summer meeting of the Hip Society was a testimonial to the resilience and dedication of the Society members to ongoing innovation in research and education. Due to travel and social distancing restrictions the 2020 summer meeting was transitioned from an in-person to a virtual meeting format. Dr Barrack and Program Chair Dr John Clohisy assisted with oversight of the meeting, while Olga Foley and Cynthia Garcia ensured the success of the meeting with remarkable planning and organization. These collaborative efforts resulted in an organized, well-attended, high level scientific meeting with engaging discussion and a remarkable virtual conference environment. The Bone & Joint Journal is very pleased to partner with The Hip Society to publish the proceedings of this very unique virtual meeting. The Hip Society is based in the United States and membership is granted to select individuals for leadership accomplishments in education and research related to hip disease. The Society is focused on the mission of advancing the knowledge and treatment of hip disorders to improve the lives of patients. The vision of the Hip Society is to lead in the discovery and dissemination of knowledge related to disorders of the hip. The annual closed meeting is one of the most important events of the society as this gathering highlights timely, controversial and novel research contributions from the membership. The top research papers from The Hip Society meeting will be published and made available to the wider orthopedic community in The Bone & Joint Journal. This partnership with The Bone & Joint Journal enhances the mission and vision of The Hip Society by international dissemination of the meeting proceedings. Given the far-reaching circulation of The Bone & Joint Journal the highest quality work is available to an expanding body of surgeons, associated healthcare providers and patients. Ultimately, this facilitates the overarching Hip Society goal of improving the lives of our patients. The 2020 virtual Hip Society meeting was characterized by outstanding member attendance, high quality paper presentations and robust discussion sessions. The meeting was held over two days and encompassed 58 open paper presentations divided into ten sessions with moderated discussions after each session. All papers will be presented in this issue in abstract form, while selected full papers passing our rigorous peer review process will be available online and in The Bone & Joint Journal in a dedicated supplement in 2021. The first session of the meeting focused on issues related to complex primary THA and osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Dr Gross presented on the conversion of hip fusion to THA in 28 patents at a mean 7 years. He reported a high clinical success rate, yet complications of heterotopic ossification and neurologic injury were relatively common. Consideration of heterotopic ossification prophylaxis and the selective use of a constrained liner were recommended. Dr Pagnano summarized the use of various contemporary porous acetabular components in 38 hips in the setting of prior pelvic radiation. The mean follow-up was 5 years and 10 year survivorship was 100% with all implants radiographically fixed. Dr Bolognesi's study demonstrated that THA in solid organ transplant patients is associated with higher risk for facility placement, transfusions and readmissions. This patient population also has increased mortality risk (4.3% risk at 1 year) especially lung transplant patients. The second group of papers focused on femoral head osteonecrosis. Dr Iorio presented single center data demonstrating that CT scan was a useful adjunct for diagnosis in the staging work-up for cancer, yet was not useful for ARCO staging and treatment decision-making. On the basic science side, Dr Goodman utilized a rabbit model of steroid-induced femoral head osteonecrosis to determine that immunomodulation with IL-4 has the potential to improve bone healing after core decompression. The session was concluded by Dr Nelson's study of ceramic-on-ceramic THA in 108 osteonecrosis patients. The median 12 year results were outstanding with marked increases in PROs, maintenance of high activity levels, and a 3.7% revision rate. In the second session attention was directed to THA instability and spinopelvic mobility. Dr Sierra presented a machine learning algorithm for THA dislocation risk. Two modifiable variables (anterior/lateral approach, elevated liner) were most influential in minimizing dislocation risk. Dr Taunton's study demonstrated a deep learning artificial intelligence model derived from postoperative radiographs to predict THA dislocation risk. High sensitivity and negative predictive value suggest that this model may be helpful in assessing postoperative dislocation risk. In reviewing a large single-center, multiple surgeon cohort of 2,831 DAA procedures, Dr Moskal noted a very low dislocation rate (0.45%) at minimum 2 years. Importantly, spinopelvic pathology or prior spinal instrumentation was not associated with an increased dislocation risk (0.30%). Dr Huo and colleagues analyzed pelvic tilt during functional gait in patients with acetabular dysplasia. They detected variable pelvic tilt on different surfaces with the data suggesting that patients with more anterior pelvic tilt while standing tend to have greater compensatory posterior pelvic tilt during gait. Dr Lamontagne reported on the sagittal and axial spinomobility in patients with hip OA, and highlighted reductions in pelvic tilt, pelvic-femoral-angle, lumbar lordosis and seated maximal trunk rotation when compared to controls. Dr Dennis showed that differences in spinopelvic mobility may explain the variable accuracy of acetabular version measurements on the cross-table lateral radiographs. Dr Gwo-Chin presented on a comprehensive functional analysis of 1,592 patients undergoing THA and observed that spinopelvic abnormalities are not infrequent (14%) in THA patients. Consistent with these findings Dr Murphy and collaborators identified a low prevalence of previous spinal instrumentation (1.5%), yet a high prevalence of spine stiffness (27.6%) in 149 patients undergoing THA. Session three highlighted various aspects of treating hip disease in young patients. Dr Peters investigated the need for subsequent hip arthroscopy in 272 patients treated with an isolated PAO. Only 4.8% of these patients required subsequent arthroscopy calling into question the routine use of combined arthroscopy and PAO. Three papers addressed questions related to THA in young patients. Dr Berend's study of 2532 hips demonstrated that high activity level was not associated with an increased risk of midterm aseptic or all cause failure. Dr Nunley presented on 43 young patients with an average age of 52 years treated with a cementless stem and modular dual mobility articulation. Stress shielding was minimal and no concerning metal ion release detected. Dr Garvin summarized minimum 15 year data of THA with highly cross-linked polyethylene in patient less than 50 years. These hips performed exceptionally well with no mechanical loosening or radiographic osteolysis. Dr Engh examined 10 year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing implant and reported a 92.9 % overall survivorship, with males less than 55 years achieving a 98.3% survivorship. The session was concluded by long-term data on the Conserve Plus hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Dr Amstutz presented an impressive dataset depicting an 83.1% 20 year survivorship for this early resurfacing cohort. Direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty was the focus of session four. Dr Meneghini reported on the anesthesia and surgical times of direct anterior and posterior approaches from a large healthcare system database. These data suggested longer OR and surgical times for the DAA both in the inpatient and ASC environments. Dr Clohisy introduced the technique and early outcomes of lateral decubitus position DAA. In a learning curve experience of 257 hips. 96% of acetabular components were in the Lewinneck safe zone, the aseptic revision rate was 0.9% and there were no dislocations. Dr Beaule analyzed femoral stem cement mantle with the DAA and posterior approaches by comparing two matched cohorts. Stem alignment and cement mantle quality were equivalent with both approaches. Similarly, Dr Emerson demonstrated technical feasibility and fewer cemented femoral stem failures when compared to cementless stems in a series of 360 DAAs THAs. The final paper of the session presented by Dr Hamilton examined the impact of surgical approach on dislocation after isolated head and liner exchange. Neither the posterior nor the anterior approach was superior in reducing the dislocation rate for these high dislocation risk procedures. The fifth session explored contemporary topics related to anesthesia and pain management. Dr Byrd opened the session with a comparative study evaluating general versus spinal anesthesia for hip arthroscopy. This preliminary study was provoked by the desire to minimize aerosolized exposure early in the COVID-19 pandemic by transitioning to spinal anesthesia. Both anesthetic methods were effective. Dr Austin presented a randomized, double-blind controlled trial comparing spinal anesthetic with mepivacaine, hyperbaric bupivacaine and isobaric bupivacaine. Mepivacaine patients ambulated earlier and were more likely to be discharged the same day. Dr Mont provided a very timely study on the effects of “cannabis use disorder” and THA outcomes. This administrative database study of 44,154 patients revealed this disorder to be associated with longer hospital stays, increased complications rates and higher costs. Dr Bedair investigated whether a highly porous acetabular component submerged in an analgesic solution could enhance perioperative pain management. Interestingly, this novel strategy was associated with a reduction of postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in 100 experimental patients compared to 100 controls. The concluding paper of the session by Dr Della Valle examined whether decreased discharge opioids led to increased postoperative opioid refills. A large single-center study of 19,428 patients detected a slight increase (5%) in opioid refills but a reduction in total refill morphine milligram equivalents. The final, sixth session of day one considered various challenging aspects of revision hip arthroplasty. Dr Nam started the session with review of preliminary results from a randomized control trial comparing closed incision negative-pressure therapy with a silver-impregnated dressing for wound management in 113 hips undergoing revision arthroplasty. Unlike previous reports, the negative pressure therapy was associated with a higher reoperation rate for wound-related complications. Dr Bostrom highlighted the potential clinical impact of basic biological interventions by establishing the presence of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETS) in fibrotic tissue from human aseptic loosening specimens and in a murine model of unstable tibial implantation. NET inhibition in the murine model prevented the expected tibial implant osseointegration failure. Dr Lombardi presented early 3.3 year clinical results of a highly porous Ti6al4v acetabular component in complex primary and revision arthroplasty. Survivorship for aseptic loosening was 96.6 % and 95.3% for the primary and revision cases, respectively. Dr Schwarzkopf and colleagues explored the impact of time to revision arthroplasty on clinical outcomes. Analysis of 188 revision cases revealed early revisions (less than 2 years from primary) were associated with worse outcomes, longer hospitalizations and higher reoperation rates. Mid-term results for modular dual mobility implants in revision arthroplasty were reviewed by Dr Lachiewicz who reported on 126 hips at a mean 5.5 years. 11% of hips dislocated and the 6 year survival was 91%. An outer head diameter of 48mm or greater was associated with a lower risk of dislocation. Dr Berry concluded the session by discussing the outcomes of treating the challenging problem of interprosthetic femur fractures. A single-center study of 77 cases treated over 32 years demonstrated a 79% success rate free of reoperation at 2 years with 95% of patients being ambulatory. The second day commenced with the seventh session evaluating recent strategies to improve short-term THA outcomes. Dr Bozic and colleagues investigated the association of quality measure public reporting with hip/knee replacement outcomes. Annual trend data from 2010–2011 and 2016–2017 indicate that hospital-level complication and readmission rates decease after the start of public reporting, yet it is difficult to prove a direct effect. Dr Slover reviewed his institutions experience with the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model and emphasized that lower CJR target prices make it increasingly difficult for programs to meet target price thresholds. Cost saving strategies including same day discharge and reduction of home health services may result in smaller losses of positive margins. Dr Barsoum reported on the influence of patient and procedure-related risk factors of length of stay after THA. Patient-related risk factors provided substantial predictive value yet procedure-related risk factors (hospital site and surgical approach) remain the main drivers of predicting length of stay. Dr Hozack reviewed an impressive, single surgeon cohort of 3,977 DAA THAs and analyzed adverse events and 90 day perioperative outcomes. Simultaneous bilateral DAA THA was comparable with unilateral or staged bilateral procedures in regards to complications, readmission rate and home discharge rate but with an increased risk of transfusion. To examine the risk of complications with outpatient joint arthroplasty, Dr Della Valle performed a single-surgeon matched cohort analysis comparing outpatient and inpatient hip and knee arthroplasties. Outpatient procedures were not associated with an increased risk of any postoperative complications and actually experienced fewer emergency department visits. The eighth session covered various contemporary challenges in hip arthroplasty care. Dr Griffin began the session with an analysis of the timing of complications associated with two-stage exchange procedures for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Of the 189 hips included, 41.6% had a complication and the mortality was 14.1% at 2.5 years, highlighting the morbidity of this treatment method. Dr Fehring provided data assessing the fate of two-stage reimplantation after failed debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for a prosthetic hip infection. This analysis of 114 hips yielded concerning results demonstrating a 42.9% treatment failure of patients treated with a previous DAIR compared to a 12.3% failure rate in patients treated with an initial 2-stage procedure. Dr Jacobs reviewed the analysis of 106 femoral heads with severe corrosion and identified a chemically dominated etching process termed “column damage” to be a detrimental damage mode within CoCr femoral heads that is directly linked to banding within its microstructure. These data indicate that implant alloy microstructure must be optimized to minimize the release of fretting-corrosion products. Simon Mears presented retrospective data from 184 THAs with a dual modular femoral stem. A subgroup of hips with a modular, cobalt chromium femoral neck had a pseudotumor visualized in 15% with only 55% of these having elevated CoCr levels. These findings may support the use of routine follow-up MARS MRI for modular CoCr femoral neck prostheses. The final two studies explored timely issues related to viral illness and hip surgery. Dr Browne analyzed three large administrative databases to elucidate whether patients are at increased risk for viral illnesses following total joint replacement. The incidence of postoperative influenza after total joint replacement was not increased compared to patients not undergoing total joint replacement surgery suggesting that arthroplasty procedures may not heighten the risk of viral illness. In the final paper of the session Dr Haddad presented important data regarding perioperative complications in coronavirus positive patients undergoing surgical treatment of femoral neck fractures. In this multicenter cohort study from the United Kingdom 82 coronavirus positive patients were shown to have longer hospital stays, more critical care unit admissions, higher risk of perioperative complications and an increased mortality compared to 340 coronavirus negative patients. The eighth session had two papers on alternative femoral stem designs and three presentations more focused on femoral fracture treatments. Dr Mihalko focused on the European and US experiences with the Metha femoral neck retaining stem. The US experience mirrored the encouraging results from Europe with a 94% all cause femoral survivorship and a 99.1% femoral aseptic loosening survivorship at 5 years. Dr Kraay summarized dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) evaluation of 16 low modulus composite femoral components at long-term follow-up of a mean 22 years. The bone mineral density associated with the implant increased in Gruen zones 2–6 and showed limited decreases in zones 1 and 7. These data support the concept that a low modulus femoral stem may more effectively load the proximal femur. Dr Springer provided data from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) and by evaluating outcomes of exact matched cohorts of 17,138 patients treated with cementless or cemented femoral implants for femoral neck fractures. Cemented implants were associated with marked reduction in early revision and periprosthetic fractures. However, cemented fixation was associated with an increased mortality at 90 days and 1 year. Additional data from the AJRR was presented by Dr Huddleston who investigated the risk factors for revision surgery after arthroplasty in a cohort of 75,333 femoral neck fractures. THA when compared to hemiarthroplasty was associated with higher early and overall revision rates. Cementless femoral fixation and increased age were also associated with higher rates of any revision. Both of these studies from the AJRR suggest that further consideration should be given to femoral fixation preferences in the femoral neck fracture population. Dr Vail summarized his institution's experience with an interdisciplinary hip fracture protocol for patients undergoing arthroplasty for acute femoral neck fractures. His study compared 157 cases prior to protocol implementation with 114 patients treated after the protocol was established. The impact of the interdisciplinary protocol was impressive as evidenced by a reduced time to operative treatment, length of stay, complication rate and one-year mortality. All being achieved without an increase in readmissions or facility discharges. The final session of the meeting addressed innovations in perioperative care of THA patients. Dr Barrack started the session with an interesting study examining the feasibility and patient preferences regarding telemedicine. A cross-sectional telephone survey of 163 arthroplasty patients indicated that 88% of patients use the internet and 94% own a device capable of videoconferencing. Nevertheless, only 18% of patients preferred a video visit over an in-person clinic visit due to concerns of inferior care. Dr Barnes quantified preoperative optimization work in 100 arthroplasty patients by using EMR activity logs and determined the surgical team spends an average 75 minutes per case on preoperative work activities. Dr Duwelius reported the early outcomes of primary THA with a smartphone-based exercise and educational platform compared to standard of care controls. A randomized control trial design with 365 patients demonstrated similar outcomes and non-inferiority of the smartphone platform relative to complications, readmissions, emergency room/urgent care visits. The association of controlled substance use with THA outcomes was assessed by Dr Higuera Rueda. A quantitative assessment using the NarxCare score identified 300 and above as a score associated with adverse outcomes after THA. Dr Macaulay reviewed data from a large retrospective study of 1,825 THAs indicating that discontinuation of intermittent pneumatic compression devices does not increase the risk of venous thromboembolism in standard risk patients being treated with 81mg ASA BID as prophylaxis. Dr Antoniou presented the final paper of the meeting investigating potential changes in patient health status as an indication for surgery over time. Data from this large systematic review of the literature found patients undergoing THA at similar health status to the past with no influence form patient age, gender, year of enrollment or geographic region. As summarized above, the 2020 virtual Hip Society Summer Meeting was rich in scientific content, productive discussion and a collaborative spirit. This collective body of work will result in impactful scientific contributions and will serve as a foundation for future innovation and advancements in the treatment of hip disease

Aims. Single-shot adductor canal block (ACB) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for postoperative analgesia is a common modality. Patients can experience breakthrough pain when the effect of ACB wears off. Local anaesthetic infusion through an intra-articular catheter (IAC) can help manage breakthrough pain after TKA. We hypothesized that combined ACB with ropivacaine infusion through IAC is associated with better pain relief compared to ACB used alone. Methods. This study was a prospective double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of combined ACB+ IAC-ropivacaine infusion (study group, n = 68) versus single-shot ACB+ intra-articular normal saline placebo (control group, n = 66) after primary TKA. The primary outcome was assessment of pain, using the visual analogue scale (VAS) recorded at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included active knee ROM 48 hours after surgery and additional requirement of analgesia for breakthrough pain. Results. The study group (mean visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of 5.5 (SD 0.889)) experienced significant reduction in pain 12 hours after surgery compared to the control group (mean VAS 6.62 (SD 1.356); mean difference = 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.46 to 0.67; p < 0.001), and pain scores on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD-2 were lower in the study group compared to the control group (mean difference in VAS pain = 1.04 (-1.39 to -0.68, 95% CI, p < 0.001). Fewer patients in the study group (0 vs 3 in the control group) required additional analgesia for breakthrough pain, but this was not statistically significant. The study group had significantly increased active knee flexion (mean flexion 86.4° (SD 7.22°)), compared to the control group (mean 73.86° (SD 7.88°), mean difference = 12.54, 95% CI 9.97 to 15.1; p < 0.014). Conclusion. Combined ACB+ ropivacaine infusion via IAC is a safe, reproducible analgesic modality after primary TKA, with superior analgesia compared to ACB alone. Further large volume trials are warranted to generate evidence on clinical significance on analgesia after TKA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1082–1088

Background. The degree of postoperative pain is usually moderate to severe following Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Comfort and lack of pain are important for optimal mobilization and earlier home discharge. Aim. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ropivacaine, a long- acting local anaesthetic, when infiltrated in the wound at the end of operation of THA. Methods. Seventy patients, 39 women and 31 men, ASA I-III, underwent Total Hip Arthroplasty in our clinic from January 2008 to June 2009. Patients were randomized into two groups. In group A, a solution of 100 ml Ropivacaine 2mg/ml (Naropeine 0,2%) was infiltrated in the deep tissues (capsule, gluteus medius, gluteus maximus and rotators) (50 ml) while the fascia, subcutaneous tissues and skin were infiltrated with the remaining 50ml. Group B was the control group. All patients received standardized general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia and a PCA morphine using a self-administered pain pump was applied in the recovery room for 48 hours. All patients took 1gr x 3 Apotel i.v., 40mg x2 Dynastat i.v., and 4mg x2 Zofron i.v. for 48 hours postoperative. Pain scores with Visual Analogue Scale (0–10) at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, time to the first analgesic requirement and side effects were recorded. Results. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics of the patients and duration of the surgery between two groups. Morphine consumption was statistically significantly lower in group A for the first 48 hours, resulting in a lower frequency of nausea, itching and sedation. Postoperative pain levels at rest and during mobilization were statistically significantly lower in group A while median hospital stay was similar in both groups. Conclusion. Operative wound infiltration with ropivacaine reduces pain and the requirement for analgesics after hip replacement, leading to faster postoperative mobilization

Aims

Up to one in five patients undergoing primary total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) require contralateral surgery. This is frequently performed as a staged procedure. This study aimed to determine if outcomes, as determined by the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Knee Score (OKS) differed following second-side surgery.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early results of a new and minimally invasive posterior gluteus maximus splitting approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and metal-on-metal hip (MOM) resurfacing. Thirty patients underwent THA (both cemented and uncemented) and 20 underwent MOM resurfacing. This single incision approach permitted THA through an incision ranging from 5.5 cm to 9 cm, and MOM resurfacing through an incision ranging from 7.5 cm to 10 cm. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was unnecessary. Body mass index was not a selection criterion. With the exception of the severely obese, this approach is suitable for all patients. Fewer than 5% of patients needed blood transfusions. Patients were mobilised early and discharged from hospital. At a mean follow-up of six months, postoperative pain scores were low, cosmetic results excellent and patient satisfaction scores high. . Patients returned to normal activities early. There were no complications

Purposes: To assess the influence of patients’ positioning following caudal epidural injections on the outcome. Methods and Results: 58 patients with low back pain and sciatica undergoing caudal epidural injection were prospectively and randomly allocated into 2 groups. 28 patients (Group 1) were positioned on the side (same side of sciatica) following the injection while 29 patients (group 2) were laid on the back. Patients were assessed using Oswestry disability index and the leg pain intensity was scored using Numerical pain intensity scale before surgery and after 6 weeks following the procedure. Pre-and postoperative pain scores were reviewed for each individual patient and the rate of improvement or worsening was noted. In group 1, 92.8 % of patients had their leg pain improved and 7.2 % remained unchanged. In group 2 however, 77% of patients did improve whereas 13.7% failed to do so and 6.8 deteriorated on the pain scale. There was a statistically significant difference in the degree of pain score improvement in favour of Group1 (Mean: 2.75 points on the scale for group 1 versus mean: 1.31 for group 2, P< 0.001, Mann-Whitney test). No difference was noted between the two groups in the improvement in the disability index (P< 0.14). Conclusions: Lying on the symptomatic side following caudal epidural injection has improved the result in terms of pain control. Such a simple manoeuvre could add benefit to the injection in terms of pain for which the procedure is mainly indicated. The longstanding functional disability remained unchanged. Ethics approval: None. Interest Statement: None

Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness of dexamethasone wound infiltration post lumbar discectomy. Design: A prospective, double blind, randomised study comparing morphine consumption in two groups of patients in elective lumbar spine surgery via the posterior approach. Subjects: There were forty patients divided into two randomly selected groups, one received postoperative wound infiltration with dexamethasone, the other with saline. Their morphine usage was measured. Outcome measures: These included levels of morphine use postoperatively, pain scores and length of hospital stay. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between postoperative morphine consumption in the two groups or in the length of hospital stay. There appeared to be improvement in pain scores with dexamethasone. There were no complications. Conclusion: Postoperative wound infiltration with dexamethasone may result in some subjective improvement in pain, but none in analgesic consumption. Despite the lack of complications the subjective benefits do not outweigh the risks in the absence of objective improvement in pain

Aims

Many surgeons choose to perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery with the aid of a tourniquet. A tourniquet is a device that fits around the leg and restricts blood flow to the limb. There is a need to understand whether tourniquets are safe, and if they benefit, or harm, patients. The aim of this study was to determine the benefits and harms of tourniquet use in TKA surgery.

Introduction. Patient demand for a less invasive surgical approach reducing the trauma induced to the joint has resulted in the development of Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS). Although the length of the surgical incision is appealing to patients, the changes are not purely cosmetic. The surgery should not violate the extensor mechanism in any way. Incisions into the quadriceps tendon or into the vastus medialis muscle make the approach less difficult but this violation will slow the recovery and affect the ROM of the knee. In Asian knees, authors found the variation of VMO, which is essential in early functional recovery in TKA patient, is so much, so new clinical test for MIS QS should be needed to show location relationship between the upper pole of the patella and the insertion of VMO itself to avoid unnecessary injury of VMO during TKA. Purpose. The purpose of this comparison study was to verify whether MIS QS TKA can be a more functional and better method in treatment of advanced degenerative arthritis comparing with mini MIS TKA. Methods. Group I: MIS QS group were 50 knees (69.3±9.7 years) and follow up period of that were 28.8± 0.4 months. Group II: mini quad split MIS TKA were 200 knees knees (67.4±5.6 years) and follow up period of that were 34.2± 0.6 months. We did clinical and radiological assessment. Results. The length of incision of group I was 9.32±0.96 cm and that of group II was 10.9±0.5 cm. In clinical assessment, the postoperative pain score of group I was 47.5±2.74 points and that of group II was 47.4±3.27 points. The postoperative knee score of group I was 94.5±5.16 points and that of group II was 93.9±5.94 points. The postoperative knee functional score of group I was 90±8.94 points and that of group II was 93.4±6.73 points. The postoperative range of motion of group I was 122±16.9 degrees and that of group II was 116±23.5 degrees. In radiological assessment, The postoperative tibiofemoral angles of group I was 5±2.6 degrees and that of group II was 5.4±2.7 degrees. The α and β angle of group I was 95±3.5, 88±3.4 degrees and that of group II was 96±2.5, 89±2.4 degrees. The γ and δ angle of group I was 5.17±4.12, 85±1.4 degrees and that of group II was 3.96±3.1, 86±1.8 degrees. Conclusions. There were no significant differences in functions between two groups. Both MIS QS and mini Quad split TKA are an effective and safe method in treatment of advanced degenerative arthritis

The purpose of this double-blinded prospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of electromyography (EMG)-guided preoperative femoral nerve block (FNB) for postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Forty knees of primary TKA by one surgeon were included in our study. One doctor performed a single injection FNB with an EMG guide in EMG group (23 knees) and with a blind maneuver in control group (17 knees). The same 10ml of 0.375% ropivacaine was injected in both groups. Same postoperative rehabilitation protocol was applied to all patients. Continuous passive motion was started at postoperative 1st day and weight bearing was started as soon as possible. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesics which contained 30mg of morphine were used until postoperative 72 hours and no additional intravenous, intramuscular or oral analgesics were used. Pain was evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Postoperative Pain Score (PPS) at postoperative 4, 24, 48 and 72 hours. The amount of opioid consumption and complication were compared between two groups. VAS score was 6.8 in EMG group and 8.0 in control group at postoperative 4 hours, 6.2 and 7.1 at postoperative 24 hours, 5.3 and 5.9 at postoperative 48 hours, and 4.6 and 5.7 at postoperative 72 hours, respectively. PPS was 2.2 in EMG group and 2.2 in control group at postoperative 4 hours, 2.1 and 2.1 at postoperative 24 hours, 1.6 and 1.7 at postoperative 48 hours, and 1.4 and 1.6 at postoperative 72 hours, respectively. The amount of opioid consumption was 6.0mg in EMG group and 7.2mg in control group during postoperative 24 hours, 2.7mg and 3.2mg during postoperative 24–48 hours, and 1.7mg and 3.2mg during postoperative 48–72 hours, respectively. There was no complication in either group. Pain tended to decrease more in EMG group than control group, especially VAS at postoperative 4, 24 and 72 hours (p< 0.05). The demand of opioid was significantly smaller in EMG group during postoperative 24 hours and 48–72 hours (p< 0.05). EMG-guided single FNB before TKA allowed better postoperative pain relief and reduced the demand of pain killer

To compare the new technique of computer assisted knee arthroplasty (CAK) against the current gold standard conventional jig based technique (JBK), 75 consecutive patients underwent knee replacement and were randomly allocated to either the CAK or JBK group. The CAK surgery was performed using a freehand technique that avoids violation of the medullary canal. Pre-and post-operative Knee society scores were collected. Post-operative CT scans were performed according to the Perth CT Knee Arthroplasty protocol and pre-and post-operative Maquet views of the limb performed. Intra-operative soft tissue release together with postoperative pain scores and blood loss were also assessed. CT scans performed show a statistically significant improvement in component alignment when using computer assisted surgery for femoral varus/valgus (p=0.032), femoral rotation (p=0.001), tibial varus/ valgus (p=0.047) tibial posterior slope (p=0.0001), tibial rotation (p=0.011) and femoral-tibial mismatch (p=0.037). Standing Maquet limb alignment was also improved (p=0.004) as was blood loss (p=0.0001). CAK surgery took longer, a mean increase of 13 minutes (p=0.0001). This is the first controlled study to assess all seven-alignment characteristics of knee arthroplasty in these two groups of patients. The improvement in alignment resulted in this trial being stopped prematurely as 6 out of 7 of the initial variables had reached significance. It shows a clear improvement in component alignment with computer navigation. The reduction in blood loss in this surgery through not violating the medullary canal will also be beneficial

Aim: To investigate the efficacy of the Insall tube realignment procedure when used to treat osteoarthrosis of the lateral facet of the patello-femoral joint. This procedure has not been reported before for this indication. Methods: The operation is a quadricepsplasty that tilts the patella to enable it to articulate on its intact medial facet, decreasing the loading of the damaged lateral surface. An independent retrospective review was performed with clinical examinations and a score of pain and activity. The mean period of follow-up was 3.6 years with a minimum of one year. Results: There were 43 operations in 30 patients (12 males), with a mean age of 54 years. The patients graded their overall pain relief and functional change as being good to excellent in 32 knees, unchanged in four knees and worse in seven knees. The overall pre- and postoperative pain scores for sitting, walking, running and stair climbing all showed improvements. Ten patients felt some quadriceps weakness on descending stairs, but only one was clinically weak. There was an increase in the number of patients with severe pain on kneeling. Three patients with unsuspected tibio-femoral degenerative change seen at surgery all had poor results. Discussion: We recommend this relatively simple and effective operation for the surgical treatment of isolated lateral facet patello-femoral osteoarthritis

Purpose: Postoperative pain is common following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and segmental spinal instrumentation (SSI) for idiopathic scoliosis (IS). It is often treated with intravenous morphine patient controlled analgesia (PCA), but no studies have examined continuous morphine infusion. The purpose of this study was to identify the safety and efficacy of continuous morphine infusion without PCA for post-operative pain management in these patients. Method: We retrospectively reviewed 338 consecutive patients from 1992 to 2006 who received continuous morphine infusion. Following induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgical incision, patients received intrathecal morphine for preemptive analgesia. Anesthesia was maintained with 50% nitrous oxide and up to 0.6% isoflurane, with minimal or no intravenous opioids. Following surgery, pre-ordered morphine infusion (0.01 mg/kg/hr) began when patients first reported pain. The infusion rate was titrated using a strict protocol based on frequent assessment of vital signs, Wong-Baker visual analog pain scores (VAS), and clinical status. The infusion continued until patients were able to take oral analgesics at postoperative day 2–3. Factors analyzed included patient demographics, intrathecal morphine dosage, intraoperative intravenous opioid dosage, pain scores through the third postoperative day, interval to start of morphine infusion, total morphine requirement in the first 48 postoperative hours, and postoperative complications. Results: Mean intrathecal morphine dose was 15.45 mcg/kg and mean interval to start of morphine infusion was 15:45 hours. Mean VAS pain scores were 3.05, 4.48, 4.48, and 4.60 at 12 hours, 1, 2, and 3 days postoperatively. The total mean dosage of morphine in the first 48 hours postoperatively was 0.03 mg/kg/hr. Nausea/vomiting, pruritis, respiratory depression, and PICU admissions related to the morphine drip occurred in 13.3%, 4.1%, 0%, and 0% of the patients during the same time period. Conclusion: A low frequency of adverse events and a mean postoperative pain score of 5 or less demonstrates that continuous postoperative morphine infusion is a safe and effective method of pain management in children following PSF and SSI for IS. Continuous morphine infusion without PCA is a safe, alternative method of pain control for postoperative patients with IS

Results in revision Hip surgery are compromised where there is extensive bony destruction or significant bone loss. While restoration of bone stock and a return to normal anatomy is the gold standard this is not always possible and may not be required in those patients with lower functional demands and other co-morbidities. The senior authors designed a new hip prosthesis as an aid to revision Arthroplasty and to allow them to bypass defects in the proximal femur. This was a titanium modular cemented prosthesis of varying lengths (from 140mm to 220mm) with a distal flange to transmit compressive loads. It used cement to obtain fixation in the remaining bone, had a short offset designed to reduce torsional loading and a standard (12/14mm) trunion to allow the use of a variety of modular heads. Operative technique: A transfemoral approach was used allowing easy removal of the old prosthesis, cement and other debris. This also gives an excellent view of the acetabulum if this is also to be revised. The distal femur is sectioned transversely and an appropriately sized component selected, the remaining femur is reamed to 14mm and cemented in place. The proximal femur is then closed over the prosthesis and held with cerclage bands. Full weight bearing was allowed once quadriceps function had been regained. Results: 48 proximal femoral replacements were performed in 47 patients between December 1992 and June 1997. 12 patients died and 6 declined follow up. The remaining patients were seen in clinic and radiographs of the femur were performed. There was a significant reduction in the postoperative pain score (p< 0.01), and improvement in the Harris hip score. 7 patients suffered dislocations, 4 responding to conservative measures after a single episode. There were 5 implants revised, 3 to total femoral replacements and 1 to a calcar replacing prosthesis. Most patients were satisfied with their result, and all but 1 walk with minimal walking aids. Despite its high complication rate we continue to use this prosthesis as we feel that it remains as a useful alternative in the management of selected low demand patients

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to compare the postoperative systemic inflammatory response in conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty (conventional TKA) versus robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (robotic TKA). Secondary aims were to compare the macroscopic soft tissue injury, femoral and tibial bone trauma, localized thermal response, and the accuracy of component positioning between the two treatment groups.

Purpose: Talonavicular arthritis, associated or not with rear foot deformity, is common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The work by Steinhauser and Gérard demonstrated the usefulness of talonavicular arthrodesis for the treatment of this rear foot disorder. The purpose of this study was to assess outcome after this surgical technique in patients with rheumatoid polyarthritis. Material and methods: Between 1988 and 1998, 26 feet (24 men, 2 women, 17 right, 7 left) were operated by the same surgeon. Mean age of the patients at surgery was 51 years. Mean delay from disease onset to talonavicular arthrodesis was 13 years. Postoperative immobilisation lasted 45 days. Mean follow-up was five years (1–10). Results: Patients were very satisfied or satisfied in 92.3% of the cases. Mean pre- and postoperative pain score was 8.14 and 1.77 respectively (p = 0.0001). Normal shoes could be worn by 37.5 and 66.7% of the patients pre- and postoperatively. Patient independence was significantly improved (p = 0.0001). The postoperative analysis of the plantar prints demonstrated pes planus and pes cavus. In 29.2 and 12.5%, the mean postoperative tibiocalcaneal angle was 0.78° with pes varus in eight cases (2°–10°). The mean Djean angle was 122.3° and 122.8° pre- and postoperatively (p = 0.24). Three talocrural joints (11.5%) that were intact preoperatively had degraded at last follow-up. The statistical analysis showed that clinical outcome was not affected by the postoperative aspect of the foot. There were three cases of tight non-union (11.5%) two of which were asymptomatic and two cases of infection (7.5%) requiring revision surgery. These complications led to two poor outcomes. Discussion: The rate of non-union varies in published series from 3 to 37%. The rate observed in our series has led us to delay weight bearing. The residual varus found in eight feet, related to a shortened medial column, may warrant intertalonavicular grafting. Conclusion: Talonavicular arthrodesis is a useful procedure despite a significant risk of complications

Aims

Although periarticular injection plays an important role in multimodal pain management following total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is no consensus on the optimal composition of the injection. In particular, it is not clear whether the addition of a corticosteroid improves the pain relief achieved nor whether it is associated with more complications than are observed without corticosteroid. The aim of this study was to quantify the safety and effectiveness of cortocosteroid use in periarticular injection during THA.

Introduction. Recent studies have challenged the concept that a single ‘correct’ alignment to standardised anatomical references is the primary driver of TKA performance with regards to patient satisfaction outcomes. Patient specific variations in musculoskeletal anatomy are one explanation for this. Virtual simulated environments such as rigid body modelling allow for the impact of component alignment and variable patient specific musculoskeletal anatomy to be studied simultaneously. This study aims to determine if the output kinematics derived from consideration of both postoperative component alignment and patient specific musculoskeletal modelling has predictive potential of Patient Reported Outcomes. Method. Landmarking of key anatomical points and 3D registration of implants was performed on 96 segmented post-operative CT scans of TKAs. Both femoral and tibia implant components were registered. Acadaver rig validated platform for generating patient specific rigid body musculoskeletal models was used to assess the resultant motions and contact forces through a 0 to 140 degree deep knee bend cycle. Resultant kinematics were segmented and tested for differentiation with and correlation to a 12 month postoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Results. Significant negative correlations (p<0.05) were found between the postoperative KOOS symptoms score and the rollback occurring in midflexion, quadriceps force in mid flexion, patella shear force and patella tilt at 90 degrees of flexion. A significant positive correlation was found between lateral shit of the patella through flexion and the symptoms score. (p<0.05) When segmenting those KOOS scores performing in the lowest 20% of patients, both rollback and the three patella measurements have statistically significantly different means (t test, p<0.05). There were other trends present that are discernible but do not have linear correlations, as they are cross-dependant on other kinematic factors or are not linear in nature. When segmenting the varus/valgus angular change into those with a varus angular change from extension to full flexion between 0 and 4 degrees (long leg axis, not implant to implant) and those with either further varus change or a valgus change, a statistically significant difference of 7 points (p<0.05) in the postoperative KOOS pain score is observed. Likewise, measured rollback of no more than 6mm without roll forward scored 10 points higher (p<0.05) in the postoperative KOOS score. These two parameters form a ‘kinematic safe zone' of outcomes in which the postoperative KOOS score is 12 points higher (p<0.05). Conclusions. The study showed statistically significant correlations between kinematic factors in a simulation of postoperative TKA and post-operative KOOS scores. The kinematic factors so captured are the result of both the variation in implant position and the subject specific, variable musculoskeletal anatomy. The presence of a ‘kinematic safe zone' in the data suggests a subject specific optimisation target for any given individual patient and the opportunity to preoperatively determine a subject specific implant position target

Aims

Intravenous dexamethasone has been shown to reduce immediate postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA), though the effects are short-lived. We aimed to assess whether two equivalent perioperative split doses were more effective than a single preoperative dose.

Introduction

The primary aim of this study was to describe a baseline comparison of early knee-specific functional outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using metaphyseal sleeves with a matched cohort of patients undergoing primary TKA. The secondary aim was to compare incidence of complications and length of stay (LOS) between the two groups.