Aims. Arthroplasties of the elbow, including total elbow arthroplasty, radial head arthroplasty, distal humeral hemiarthroplasty, and radiocapitellar arthroplasty, are rarely undertaken. This scoping review aims to outline the current research in this area to inform the development of future research. Methods. A scoping review was undertaken adhering to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines using Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and trial registries, limited to studies published between 1 January 1990 and 7 February 2021. Endnote software was used for screening and selection, and included randomized trials, non-randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, analytical cross-sectional studies, and case series of ten or more patients reporting the clinical outcomes of elbow arthroplasty. The results are presented as the number of types of studies, sample size, length of follow-up, clinical outcome domains and instruments used, sources of funding, and a narrative review. Results. A total of 362 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were of total elbow arthroplasty (246; 68%), followed by radial head arthroplasty (100; 28%), distal humeral hemiarthroplasty (11; 3%), and radiocapitellar arthroplasty (5; 1%). Most were retrospective (326; 90%) and observational (315; 87%). The median sample size for all types of implant across all studies was 36 (interquartile range (IQR) 21 to 75). The median length of follow-up for all studies was 56 months (IQR 36 to 81). A total of 583 unique outcome descriptors were used and were categorized into 18 domains. A total of 105 instruments were used to measure 39 outcomes. Conclusion. We found that most of the literature dealing with elbow arthroplasty consists of retrospective observational studies with small sample sizes and short follow-up. Many outcomes have been used with many different instruments for their measurement, indicating a need to define a core set of outcomes and instruments for future research in this area. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1148–1155

The February 2024 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360. looks at: Does indomethacin prevent heterotopic ossification following elbow fracture fixation?; Arthroscopic capsular shift in atraumatic shoulder joint instability; Ultrasound-guided lavage with corticosteroid injection versus sham; Combined surgical and exercise-based interventions following primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis; Are vascularized fibula autografts a long-lasting reconstruction after intercalary resection of the humerus for primary bone tumours?; Anatomical versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with limited forward elevation; Tension band or plate fixation for simple displaced olecranon fractures?; Is long-term follow-up and monitoring in shoulder and elbow arthroplasty needed?

The June 2023 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360. looks at: Proximal humerus fractures: what does the literature say now?; Infection risk of steroid injections and subsequent reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Surgical versus non-surgical management of humeral shaft fractures; Core outcome set needed for elbow arthroplasty; Minimally invasive approaches to locating radial nerve in the posterior humeral approach; Predictors of bone loss in anterior glenohumeral instability; Does the addition of motor control or strengthening exercises improve rotator cuff-related shoulder pain?; Terminology and diagnostic criteria used in patients with subacromial pain syndrome

Aims. Our primary aim was to establish the proportion of female orthopaedic consultants who perform arthroplasty via cases submitted to the National Joint Registry (NJR), which covers England, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man, and Guernsey. Secondary aims included comparing time since specialist registration, private practice participation, and number of hospitals worked in between male and female surgeons. Methods. Publicly available data from the NJR was extracted on the types of arthroplasty performed by each surgeon, and the number of procedures of each type undertaken. Each surgeon was cross-referenced with the General Medical Council (GMC) website, using GMC number to extract surgeon demographic data. These included sex, region of practice, and dates of full and specialist registration. Results. Of 2,895 surgeons contributing to the NJR in 2023, 102 (4%) were female. The highest proportions of female surgeons were among those who performed elbow (n = 25; 5%), shoulder (n = 24; 4%), and ankle (n = 8; 4%) arthroplasty. Hip (n = 66; 3%) and knee arthroplasty (n = 39; 2%) had the lowest female representation. Female surgeons had been practising for a median of 10.4 years since specialist registration compared to 13.7 years for males (p < 0.001). Northern Ireland was the region with the highest proportion of female arthroplasty surgeons (8%). A greater proportion of male surgeons worked in private practice (63% vs 24%; p < 0.001) and in multiple hospitals (74% vs 40%; p < 0.001). Conclusion. Only 4% of surgeons currently contributing cases to the NJR are female, with the highest proportion performing elbow arthroplasty (5%). Female orthopaedic surgeons in the NJR are earlier in their careers than male surgeons, and are less involved in private practice. There is a wide geographical variation in the proportion of female arthroplasty surgeons. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(8):637–643

The aim of the New Zealand Elbow Arthroplasty Register is to evaluate the provision of elbow arthroplasty across the entire country by both recording accurate technical information and measuring the clinical outcomes of all elbow replacements performed in New Zealand. An initial form is completed at the time of surgery which includes details of the patient, surgical indications, the surgical procedure, the implant and the operating surgeon. Six months following surgery, all registered patients are asked to complete a questionnaire to measure the pain and function of the replaced elbow and to comment on any post operative complications. Data from 99 consecutive primary and 16 revision elbow arthroplasties was prospectively collected from January 2000 till December 2003. Rheumatoid arthritis was the commonest indication (63 cases) and the outcome was significantly better than for trauma and osteoarthritis. The Coonrad-Morrey was the most commonly used prosthesis (86 cases) followed by the Kudo (eight cases) and the Acclaim (five cases). 21 surgeons performed elbow arthroplasty during the study period but only five performed on average more than one case per year. Their results at six months were statistically superior to those provided by other surgeons. The number of complications reported by patients and the revision rate within the study period was low. An infection was seen in only two patients. The New Zealand Elbow Arthroplasty Register has become a robust method of assessment of the provision of elbow arthroplasty within the country. Our findings support the idea that elbow arthroplasty should not be performed by general orthopaedic surgeons on an occasional basis

We divided 309 patients with an inflammatory arthritis who had undergone primary elbow replacement using the Souter-Strathclyde implant into two groups according to their age. The mean follow-up in the older group (mean age 64 years) was 7.3 years while in the younger patients (mean age 42 years) it was 12 years. Survivorship for three different failure end-points (revision, revision because of aseptic loosening of the humeral component, and gross loosening of the humeral implant), was compared in both groups. Our findings showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of loosening when young rheumatoid patients were compared with an older age group

Introduction: The design of the GSB III elbow arthroplasty has essentially remained unchanged since 1978 until recently. Because of observations of aseptic loosening of the ulnar component, the ulnar stem was changed in an excentric curved shape. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcome after more than 2 years of follow up with the new ulnar stem shape. Patients and methods: Between january 2000 and august 2002, 34 patients had undergone 36 total elbow replacements with the GSB III device with a new curved ulnar shape. Nineteen patients (20 elbows) underwent the operation for the first elbow arthroplasty and 16 patients underwent revision surgery. The mean follow up was 35 months (R: 25–49). The subjective satisfaction and pain intensity were assessed. Clinical exam recorded range of motion and strength. Radiographs were analysed for implant loosening and osteolysis. Results: There was a significant improvement of the average range of motion in flexion-extension from pre-operative 82degree to postoperative 105degree for all 36 elbows (t-test, p< 0,005). The 20 cases with primary elbow arthroplasty showed a significant improvement in the average range of flexion-extension from 76degree to 106degree (t-test, p< 0,001). The subjective assessment for satisfaction averaged 93 per cent at the time of follow up. For the 16 patients with revision elbow arthroplasty, the average range of flexion-extension improved from 90degree to 103degree (p< 0,01). The mean subjective satisfaction rated at 94 per cent. One case showed a radiolucent line at the ulnar component which remained unchanged at follow up. There was no component loosening. Discussion: The new excentric curved ulnar component shows no case of component loosening in our series for primary and revision elbow arthroplasty after 2 years. The range of motion and patient satisfaction are promising

Objective:. Total elbow joint arthroplasty has limited longevity and is therefore not appropriate for younger rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthroplasty using an inter-positional membrane may be another surgical option for this population. However, clinical results for joint arthroplasty using the inter-positional membrane have not traditionally been favorable because rheumatoid activity could not be controlled. Today, rheumatoid activity can be controlled with biologics; therefore, the utility of the inter-positional membrane procedure was re-evaluated. Methods:. An 8×6 cm sheet of fascia was detached from the patient's tensor fascia lata muscle to produce a JK membrane. The fascia was stretched on a frame and kept in a 2% chromic acid potassium solution for 24 hours. Then, the fascia was exposed to direct sunlight in order to reduce the dichromic acid. The fascia was washed out in running water for 24 hours and was then stored in phenol with the addition of 70% alcohol. Elbow arthroplasties were performed on three elbow joints in two young female patients. The first case had a significantly damaged right elbow joint with severe joint dysfunction. A JK membrane arthroplasty was done for the first case in 2003, when this patient was 34 years old. Biologics were administered with methotrexate after the surgery. The second case demonstrated bilateral ankylosed elbows due to idiopathic juvenile arthritis. Bilateral JK membrane arthroplasties were performed in 2010, when this patient was 32 years old. Several operative and manual manipulations were necessary in order to increase the range of motion following surgery. Biologics were administered with cyclosporine. Results:. Joint function was significantly improved in all three joints without pain after the JK membrane elbow arthroplasties. In case one, the JOA (Japan Orthopaedic Association) elbow score improved from 21 points before surgery to 85 points after surgery and active elbow flexion improved to 110 degrees following surgery. In case two, the JOA elbow score was 55 and 82 points in the right elbow and 52 and 83 points in left elbow before and after surgery, respectively. In case two, active flexion improved to 120 degrees for the right elbow and 110 degrees for the left elbow following surgery. RA was well controlled in both patients. Conclusion:. Elbow arthroplasty using an inter-positional membrane appears to be useful in young patients when RA activity is controlled with biologics

We report 5 cases of linked shoulder and elbow replacement (LSER) following failure of single-joint arthroplasty. Whilst total humeral replacement has been reported for treatment following resection for tumour we know of no reports of linked shoulder and elbow prostheses for arthropathy alone. Between May and December 2005, 2 patients with total elbow arthroplasty and 3 patients with total shoulder arthroplasty were revised to LSER for loosening of the long humeral stems or periprosthetic fracture. Custom-made prostheses were produced using computer-aided design and manufacture technology. There were no early complications including infection. All 5 patients reported early improvement of symptoms, with the ability to bear weight axially through the limb, restored. This technique avoids the problem of a stress riser between the stems of separate shoulder and elbow replacements and solves the problem of salvage of long-stemmed implants where no further humeral fixation is possible

Introduction. Cement pressurisation in the distal humerus is technically difficult due to the anatomy of the humeral intramedullary (IM) cavity. Conventional cement restrictors often migrate proximally or leak, reducing the effect of pressurisation during implantation. Theoretically with a better cement bone interdigitation, the longevity of the elbow replacement can be improved. The aim of this cadaveric study was to evaluate the usefulness of a novel technique for cementation. Method. Eight paired fresh frozen cadaveric elbows were randomly allocated to conventional cementing techniques or cementing using a paediatric foley catheter as a temporary restrictor. The traditional cementing technique consisted of canal preparation using irrigation, brushing and drying prior to cementation, with no use of a cement restrictor. The new technique involved same canal preparation but prior to cementation a size 8 foley catheter was introduced and the balloon inflated to act as a temporary cement restrictor. The humeri were cut into 10mm sections. Each slice was photographed and radiographed. This dual imaging technique was used to establish the best methodology for evaluation of cement penetration. Cement penetration was calculated as a ratio of the area of intra-medullary cavity occupied by the cement. Results. There was no significant difference between the photographic and radiographic method of measuring cement penetration. Cement penetration was significantly better in the foley catheter group (P = 0.002-0.037). The maximum penetration was observed in the most distal 2-5cm. Conclusion. The foley catheter technique consistently and significantly achieved a better cement interdigitation into the cancellous bone, without leaving a void in the cement. This study has demonstrated a new cementing technique for elbow arthroplasty, utilising a paediatric foley catheter as a temporary humeral intra-medullary plug, increasing cement pressurisation and restricting proximal cement migration. Future studies using this methodology will not require supplementation of photographs with radiographic analysis

A systematic review of the English language literature has suggested that the performance of linked and unlinked elbow replacement implants differ in terms of function, survival and mode of failure; however, in this review, only one comparative series using contemporary implants was identified. We have performed a cohort study of Kudo, Souter-Strathclyde and Coonrad-Morrey elbow replacements performed at a single centre by or under the direct supervision of a single Consultant shoulder and elbow surgeon to see if these findings were reflected in clinical practice. The first forty implantations in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis for each device have been reviewed with respect to surgical complications, elbow function and implant survival. The follow-up was shorter for the Coonrad-Morrey cohort. In terms of pain relief and range of motion, the performance of the implants was comparable. The mode of failure was different, with no dislocations/ instability seen with the linked Coonrad-Morrey implants. The loosening rate of the Coonrad-Morrey implants (both clinical and radiographic) was lower, albeit with a shorter follow-up period. The loosening rates seen in this series were higher than those previously reported in the English language literature. We conclude that the functional performance of the implants, at similar stages of the surgical learning curves, are similar in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis, but that use of a linked implant removes the risk of post-operative instability and may reduce the risk of the radiographic and clinical loosening

We present the results of 525 primary Souter elbow arthroplasties undertaken in 406 patients between 1982 and 1997. There were 372 women and 34 men with a mean age of 57 years; 119 patients had a bilateral procedure. The elbows were affected by chronic inflammatory disease, usually rheumatoid arthritis, which had been present for a mean of 24.7 years (2 to 70). In about 30% the joints were grossly destroyed with significant loss of bone. In 179 elbows the ulnar components were metal-backed and retentive; in the remaining 346, with better bone stock, non-retentive, all-polyethylene prostheses were used. Because of complications, 108 further operations were required in 82 patients. During the early years the incidence of complications was higher. Dislocation was the indication for 30 further procedures in 26 patients. Thirty patients underwent 33 revision procedures for aseptic loosening, 12 had 29 operations because of deep infection, two for superficial infection, and 14 further operations were done for other reasons. The cumulative rate of success, without aseptic loosening, five and ten years after surgery, was 96% and 85%, respectively

This study assesses long term performance of the Souter-Strathclyde elbow arthroplasty. From 1984 to 1999, 68 Souter-Strathclyde prostheses were inserted in 53 patients; nine patients died, one was lost and 38 (88%) had full clinical examination. Mean survival was 72 months (range 8 to 187), 25 elbows survived to 5-year follow up, with improvement in pain, motion, stability and function. Mayo score was satisfactory in 92% of all 68 elbows. Complications occurred in 13 elbows (19%) and 14 elbows were revised for instability (six), fracture (three), loosening (three) and intraoperative problems (two). Survivorship at 10 years was 74% (95% Confidence Interval ± 7. 7)

Introduction: Distal humeral fractures represent a constant challenge to the most experienced surgeon. This is the first report of the use of an unlinked prosthesis for the treatment of distal humeral fractures in elderly persons. Materials and Methods: From July 2000 to June 2001, 9 iBP elbow arthroplasties were performed in patients with acute fractures of the distal humerus. The average age of the group was 71 years. The mean interval between injury and TER was 11 days. The follow-up period averaged 12 months (range 5 to 16). Results: Functional outcome was evaluated with patient-completed questionnaires. All patients had a flexion contracture of the elbow ranging from 15 to 30 degrees. All patients were able to perform daily activities, pain relief was satisfactory and patient satisfaction was high. All elbows met the criteria for functional motion and were stable at the latest follow-up examination. There were no major complications such as dislocation, ulnar nerve dysfunction or deep infection. Conclusion: Unlinked non-congruous elbow arthroplasty when combined with a surgical exposure that allows proper soft tissue balance and instrumentation that enables correct positioning of the components can be a successful alternative in the management of acute distal humeral fractures in selected patients when conventional fixation is not a viable option

This paper describes the development, operative technique and results of an unconstrained total elbow arthroplasty. Forty-seven elbow replacements were carried out in 44 patients between 1974 and 1982. There was a high rate of loosening in the early condylar replacements. The results in patients with post-traumatic arthritis were poor. The later design employs an ulnar stem, with a humeral stem if the distal humeral bone stock is poor. When used in carefully selected patients with rheumatoid arthritis, pain is reduced significantly, stability and movement are preserved and function is improved

Introduction: In the evaluation of the major joints, self assessment tools have become wide spread aiming at a more precise quantification of joint function. Different tools have been developed for the elbow joint. However, there are only few data on the relationship between subjective self-assessment of joint function and objective measures. We developed a comprehensive assessment set for the evaluation of subjective elbow function and objective clinical findings and investigate long-term results after implantation of GSB III Elbow arthroplasties in a first study. The PREE-G was cross-culturally adapted, following the recommendations of the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons. Material and Methods: 79 patients (56 female, 23 male, mean age 64 years) after elbow arthroplasty between 1984 and 1996 due to rheumatoid (59) or posttraumatic (20) arthritis underwent an assessment of the joint function using the PREE, the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH)) and the modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (mASES) for a clinical evaluation. In 62 patients implantation was performed unilaterally and in 17 patients bilaterally, resulting in 96 elbow joints altogether. The mean follow up time was 11,2 years. Results: In the SF-36 score, the mean physical component scale (PCS) was worse (37,2 vs 41,7, p=0,004), the mean mental component scale (MCS) better (52,3 vs 50,3, p=0,092) than normative values of a German population. Subjective assessment by the PREE revealed a mean of 66,8, by the mASES of 63,1 and by the DASH of 56,5 points. Clinical examination resulted in a mean mASES score of 71,6 points. Comparison between the patients self assessment and the objective score revealed a significant correlation between the DASH (r=0,46, p< 0,001), PREE (p=0,54, p< 0,001) and mASES (r=0,60, p< 0,001) with the clinical mASES. In contrast, no significant correlation was found between the physical component scale (PCS) and mental component scale (MCS) of SF-36 and the clinical mASES. Also the patients assessment scores DASH, PREE and mASES showed a strong significant correlation among one another (r=0,74–0,92, p< 0,001) and (PCS) (r=0,58–0,75, p< 0,001) but not with the (MCS) of SF-36. Conclusion: Assessment of long term results after elbow arthroplasty yielded favourable clinical and subjective results. The clinical outcome tended to be higher than results of the patient self-rated scores. Hereby, the newly developed assessment set proved to be a feasible tool for a comprehensive assessment of elbow function. In addition to clinical outcome assessment, with this set it is possible to gain important and new insights on the relationship between objective measures and subjective patients-assessment of elbow disorders and postoperative conditions

This study assesses the clinical performance of the Souter-Strathclyde elbow arthroplasty with a standardised index and long term survivorship analysis. We undertook assessment of 68 primary Souter-Strathclyde total elbow replacements. Of 53 patients assessed with pre-operative Souter-Strathclyde charts, nine died and one was lost to follow-up, 43 had radiographic and telephone review, and 38 (88%) had clinical examination according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index. Survival of the 43 elbows was to a mean of 72 months (range: eight to 187 months) with improvement in pain, motion, stability and function. Eight of 10 elbows in deceased patients had satisfactory scores at the last assessment. Ulnar neuropraxia occurred in eight elbows (12%), persistent sensory deficit in two (3%) and motor deficit in one. Two triceps abscesses required local skin flap cover. Revision was undertaken in 14 elbows (20%) for instability (six) bony injury (three), loosening (three) and intraoperative problems (two). The survivorship at 13 years was 74% with 62 (91%) of all elbows achieving a satisfactory Mayo score

This study assesses the clinical performance of the Souter-Strathclyde elbow arthroplasty with a standardised index and long-term survivorship analysis. We undertook assessment of 68 primary Souter-Strathclyde total elbow replacements. Of 53 patients assessed with pre-operative Souter-Strathclyde charts, nine died and one was lost to follow-up, 43 had radiographic and telephone review, and 38 (88%) had clinical examination according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index. Survival of the 43 elbows was to a mean of 72 months (range 8 to 187). A cohort of 25 elbows available for review with > 5-year follow up had improvement in pain, motion, stability and function. Eight of ten elbows in deceased patients had satisfactory scores at the last assessment. Ulnar neuropraxia occurred in eight elbows (12%), persistent sensory deficit in two (3%) and motor deficit in one. Two triceps abscesses required local skin flap cover. Revision was undertaken in 14 elbows (20%) for instability (6) bony injury (3), loosening (3) and intraoperative problems (2). The survivorship at 13 years was 74% with 62 (91%) of all elbows achieving a satisfactory Mayo score

We have reviewed 36 of 39 consecutive patients with an average age of 68 years who had semiconstrained elbow replacement for distal humeral nonunion at an average follow-up of 50.4 months (24 to 127). Of these, 31 (86%) had satisfactory results, three (8%) had fair, and two (6%) had poor results; 32 patients (88%) had moderate or severe pain before and 91% had no or only mild discomfort after the procedure. Motion had improved from a mean arc of 29 degrees to 103 degrees before operation to 16 degrees to 127 degrees after surgery. All five flail extremities were stable at last assessment. There were seven complications (18%): two patients had deep infection, two had particulate synovitis, two had ulnar neuropathy and one had worn polyethylene bushes. Five of these seven, excluding the two with transient nueropathy, required reoperation (13%). Joint replacement arthroplasty can be a safe and reliable treatment for this difficult clinical condition, seen most commonly in elderly patients. This is a significant advance, since repeated osteosynthesis has been shown to be ineffective in most patients

Aims: To evaluate the short to medium term outcome of the Souter-Strathclyde prosthesis when used as a primary elbow arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. Introduction: The Souter-Strathclyde prosthesis has been evaluated in several studies. In our hospital the operation is carried out using the same strict precautions as for lower limb arthroplasty. At the onset of surgery the ulnar nerve is handled minimally. This study looked at infection and complication rates, and also at outcome. Methods: The operations were carried out in laminar flow theatres and scrubbed staff wore exhaust suits. At the start of the procedure the ulnar nerve was decompressed, but not mobilised from its bed, and held loosely with tape while being kept moist. Cases were identified from theatre and implant records. 61 implants in 53 patients were identified. Complication and revision rates were established from case sheets. Of this group 19 patients had died, leaving 40 implants in 34 patients suitable for review. Case notes were analysed. Patients were contacted by post and were requested to fill out a DASH form. 30 patients (34 implants) responded; 2 declined to be involved leaving 31 implants in 28 patients to analyse, 78% of those available. Results: From the 61 implants there were 4 complications within the first year; one ulnar nerve palsy – transient, one dislocated prosthesis – open reduction, two wound infections. The infection rate is thus 3.3%. Overall to date 4 implants from 61 required revision, a rate of 6.6% (range 13–92 months, mean 37 months). Reasons – one loose, two periprosthetic fractures and one infection. Mean follow up at clinic was 74 months (range 36–120). Mean DASH score at follow up was 48.7 (range 4.5–81.8). Conclusion: The lower incidence of ulnar nerve palsy, compared to published studies, may be attributable to the surgical technique. The use of laminar flow theatres and exhaust suits may account for the lower infection rates. The complication rate and revision rate is favourable compared to previous studies

Aim: To evaluate the short to medium term outcome of the Souter-Strathclyde prosthesis when used as a primary elbow arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. Introduction: The Souter-Strathclyde prosthesis has been evaluated in several studies. In our hospital the operation is carried out using the same strict precautions as for lower limb arthroplasty. At the onset of surgery the ulnar nerve is handled minimally. This study looked at infection and complication rates, and also at outcome. Methods: The operations were carried out in laminar flow theatres with exhaust suits. At the start of the procedure the ulnar nerve was decompressed, but not mobilised from its bed, and held loosely with tape while being kept moist. Cases were identified from theatre and implant records. 61 implants in 53 patients were identified. Complication and revision rates were established from case sheets. Of this group 19 patients had died leaving 40 implants in 34 patients suitable for review. Case notes were analysed. Patients were contacted by post and were asked to fill out a DASH form. 30 patients (34 implants) responded. 26 patients (30 implants) attended a review clinic. Results: From the 61 implants there were 4 complications (one ulnar nerve dysthesia – transient, one dislocated prosthesis – open reduction, two wound infections) within the first year. Overall, 4 implants from 62 required revision, a rate of 6.5% (range 11–92 months, mean 37 months). Reasons – One loose, two periprosthetic fractures and one infection. Mean follow up was 74 months (range 36–120). Mean DASH score at follow up was 48.7 (range 4.5–81.8). Conclusion: The low incidence of ulnar nerve palsy, compared to published studies, may be attributable to the surgical technique. The use of laminar flow theatres and exhaust suits may account for the low infection rate. The complication rate and revision rate is comparable to previous published studies

Purpose: The long-term experience of linked semicon-strained total elbow arthroplasty was investigated as a salvage procedure for patients with distal humerus non-union not amenable to internal fixation. Method: Ninety-two consecutive total elbow arthroplasties performed for the treatment of a distal humeral nonunion were reviewed at an average follow-up of 6.5 years (range, 0.5 to 20.3 years). There were twenty-two men and sixty-nine women with an average age of sixtyfive years (range, twenty-two to eighty-four years) at the time of elbow replacement. Seventy-six elbows (83 per cent) had undergone prior surgery, with an average of two previous operations (range, one to ten). Five elbows had had at least one prior operation due to infection. Results: Seventy-nine per cent of the patients had no pain or mild pain at latest follow-up compared with moderate or severe pain in 86 percent prior to surgery. Mean extension was improved from thirty-seven to twenty-two degrees and mean flexion from 106 to 135 degrees. Joint stability was restored in all patients, including nine with a grossly flail elbow. Complications included aseptic loosening in sixteen (four with periprosthetic fractures), component fracture in five, deep infection in five (three with previous infection), and bushing wear in one patient. At most recent follow-up, 85 per cent of the patients were satisfied with their outcome. Survivorship for not requiring removal or revision for any cause was 95.7 per cent at two years, 82.1 per cent at five years, 65.3 per cent at ten and fifteen years. Factors that increased the risk of implant failure were patient age less than sixty-five, two or more prior surgeries, and history of previous infection. Conclusion: Linked semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty provides a reliable salvage procedure to provide pain relief and restoration of motion and function in patients with distal humerus nonunion not amenable to internal fixation. Risk factors for failure include younger patients, multiple previous surgeries, and history of infection

We reviewed 50 capitellocondylar elbow replacements performed by the lateral approach in 42 rheumatoid patients, at a median follow-up of three years. There were two major and 17 minor complications; 18 were early and one was late. Eight elbows required reoperation: soft-tissue surgery was performed in seven and prosthesis removal in one because of a deep infection. There were few problems of instability, but one patient sustained a traumatic dislocation which was stabilised after ligament reconstruction. Wound healing was delayed in two of five elbows which had been immobilised postoperatively for only five days, but healing was rapid in 45 elbows immobilised for 12 days. There was transient ulnar-nerve palsy postoperatively in 11 patients, with permanent palsy in three. All elbows were painfree or only slightly painful at follow-up; 49 were stable and 43 had a range of motion sufficient for activities of daily living. Radiological loosening of the humeral component was suspected in one asymptomatic elbow. The lateral approach is recommended for use with the capitellocondylar type of prosthesis in rheumatoid elbows with reasonably well-preserved bone stock

Cement pressurisation in the distal humerus is technically difficult due to the anatomy of the humeral intramedullary (IM) cavity. Conventional cement restrictors often migrate proximally, reducing the effect of pressurisation during arthroplasty. Theoretically with a better cement bone interdigitation, the longevity of the elbow replacement can be improved. The aim of this cadaveric study was to evaluate the usefulness of a novel technique for cementation. Eight paired cadaveric elbows were used. The sides were randomly allocated to the conventional cementation group and pressurisation using a foley cathetre used as a cement restrictor. The cathetre was inserted into the IM canal after thorough washout and drying the cavity. The balloon inflated to act as a cement restrictor. Cementation was then performed and the cathetre removed just prior to cement setting. Radiographs of each pair was taken. Each distal humerus sample was cut in 1 cm increments starting from proximal part of the coronoid fossa. The slices were also radiographed to assess cement-bone interdigitation. The area of IM canal and the cement were calculated. The paired samples were compared. The new technique consistently and significantly achieved a better cement interdigitation into the cancellous bone. The maximum penetration was observed in the proximal 1–3 cms from the coronoid fossa. According to previous studies, this area is the most common part involved in cement failure and loosening. This study confirms the effectiveness of a foley cathetre as a cement restrictor. The ease of the technique and excellent pressurisation achived support its use

The Acclaim total elbow replacement is a modular system which allows implantation in both unlinked and linked modes. The results of the use of this implant in primary total elbow replacement in 36 patients, operated on between July 2000 and August 2002, are presented at a mean follow-up of 36 months (24 to 49). Only one patient did not have good relief of pain, but all had improved movement and function.

No implant showed clinical or radiological loosening, although one had a lucent area in three of seven humeral zones. The short-term results of the Acclaim total elbow replacement are encouraging. However, 11 patients (30.5%) suffered an intra-operative fracture of the humeral condyle. This did not affect the outcome, or the requirement for further surgery, except in one case where the fracture failed to unite. This problem has hopefully been addressed by redesigning the humeral resection guide. Other complications included three cases of ulnar neuropathy (8.3%) and one of deep infection (2.8%).

Medium-term results of the Discovery elbow replacement are presented. We reviewed 51 consecutive primary Discovery total elbow replacements (TERs) implanted in 48 patients. The mean age of the patients was 69.2 years (49 to 92), there were 19 males and 32 females (37%:63%) The mean follow-up was 40.6 months (24 to 69). A total of six patients were lost to follow-up. Statistically significant improvements in range movement and Oxford Elbow Score were found (p < 0.001). Radiolucent lines were much more common in, and aseptic loosening was exclusive to, the humeral component. Kaplan–Meier survivorship at five years was 92.2% (95% CI 74.5% to 96.4%) for aseptic loosening. In four TERs, periprosthetic infection occurred resulting in failure. A statistically significant association between infection and increased BMI was found (p = 0.0268). Triceps failure was more frequent after the Mayo surgical approach and TER performed after previous trauma surgery. No failures of the implant were noted.

Our comparison shows that the Discovery has early clinical results that are similar to other semi-constrained TERs. We found continued radiological surveillance with particular focus on humeral lucency is warranted and has not previously been reported. Despite advances in the design of total elbow replacement prostheses, rates of complication remain high.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1359–65

We studied, ten patients (11 elbows) who had undergone 14 allograft-prosthesis composite reconstructions following failure of a previous total elbow replacement with massive structural bone loss. There were nine women and one man with a mean age of 64 years (40 to 84), who were reviewed at a mean of 75 months (24 to 213). One patient developed a deep infection after 26 months and had the allograft-prosthesis composite removed, and two patients had mild pain. The median flexion-extension arc was 100° (95% confidence interval (CI) 76° to 124°). With the exception of the patient who had the infected failure, all the patients could use their elbows comfortably without splints or braces for activities of daily living. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index improved from 9.5 (95% CI 4.4 to 14.7) pre-operatively to 74 (95% CI 62.4 to 84.9) at final review.

Radiologically, the rate of partial resorption was similar in the humeral and ulnar allografts (three of six and four of eight, respectively; p > 0.999). The patterns of resorption, however, were different. Union at the host-bone-allograft junction was also different between the humeral and ulnar allografts (one of six and seven of eight showing union, respectively; p = 0.03).

At medium-term follow-up, allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction appears to be a useful salvage technique for failed elbow replacements with massive bone loss. The effects of allograft resorption and host-bone-allograft junctional union on the longevity of allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction, however, remain unknown, and it is our view that these patients should remain under long-term regular review.

The Norway elbow prosthesis is a non-constrained cemented total replacement. It depends on intact collateral ligaments for stability, and allows a full range of movement. The system includes several sizes of components, all freely interchangeable, and semi-constraint can be provided by a locking ring if damaged collateral ligaments make dislocation possible.

The prosthesis has been used in more than 350 elbows in Norway and the detailed results for 118 elbows studied prospectively since 1987 are reported. It is inserted through a posterolateral triceps-splitting incision with minimal muscle disruption and bone resection, preserving the collateral ligaments. The results as regards pain relief and range of movement were comparable with those of other elbow prostheses, but there were fewer serious complications. At a mean follow-up of 4.3 years, the failure rate was 3.4%.

Unlinked, linked and convertible total elbow arthroplasties (TEAs) are currently available. This study is the first to report the clinical results of the convertible Latitude TEA. This was a retrospective study of a consecutive cohort of 63 patients (69 primary TEAs) with a mean age of 60 years (23 to 87). Between 2006 and 2008 a total of 19 men and 50 women underwent surgery. The mean follow-up was 43 months (8 to 84). The range of movement, function and pain all improved six months post-operatively and either continued to improve slightly or reached a plateau thereafter. The complication rate is similar to that reported for other TEA systems. No loosening was seen. Remarkable is the disengagement of the radial head component in 13 TEAs (31%) with a radial head component implanted.

Implantation of both the linked and the unlinked versions of the Latitude TEA results in improvement of function and decreased pain, and shows high patient satisfaction at mid-term follow-up.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:681–8.

Determining and accurately restoring the flexion-extension axis of the elbow is essential for functional recovery after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). We evaluated the effect of morphological features of the elbow on variations of alignment of the components at TEA. Morphological and positioning variables were compared by systematic CT scans of 22 elbows in 21 patients after TEA.

There were five men and 16 women, and the mean age was 63 years (38 to 80). The mean follow-up was 22 months (11 to 44).

The anterior offset and version of the humeral components were significantly affected by the anterior angulation of the humerus (p = 0.052 and p = 0.004, respectively). The anterior offset and version of the ulnar components were strongly significantly affected by the anterior angulation of the ulna (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001).

The closer the anterior angulation of the ulna was to the joint, the lower the ulnar anterior offset (p = 0.030) and version of the ulnar component (p = 0.010). The distance from the joint to the varus angulation also affected the lateral offset of the ulnar component (p = 0.046).

Anatomical variations at the distal humerus and proximal ulna affect the alignment of the components at TEA. This is explained by abutment of the stems of the components and is particularly severe when there are substantial deformities or the deformities are close to the joint.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1539–45.

Between 1978 and 1986, 59 patients received a GSB III elbow prosthesis, six of them in both elbows. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was the underlying cause in 51 of the patients and post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) in eight. Of these, 24 patients (28 prostheses) have since died; two, both operated on bilaterally, had had their implants for more than ten years and had already been assessed for inclusion in the long-term follow-up. Two patients, each with one elbow prosthesis, have been lost to follow-up and three males who are still living (two with PTOA, one with juvenile RA) had their prosthesis removed before ten years had elapsed.

The remaining 32 patients (28 RA, 4 PTOA) with 36 GSB III elbows were examined clinically and radiologically after a mean period of 13.5 years. Pain was considerably reduced in 91.6%. Mobility was increased by 37° in those with RA and by 67° in those with PTOA.

There were three cases of aseptic loosening and three of deep infection. The main complication was disassembly of the prosthetic component in nine elbows (13.8%). This last group included two patients with postoperative fractures unrelated to the operative technique and one with neuropathic arthritis. Ulnar neuritis occurred in two patients.

Since 87.7% of all the GSB III prostheses implanted in this period remained in situ, our results are comparable with those for hip and knee arthroplasty.

Six highly unstable elbows with severe bone loss due to rheumatoid arthritis were replaced by a non-constrained, unlinked prosthesis. Bone defects were filled with autogenous bone grafts. The mean follow-up was 4.5 years (2 to 8).

The clinical results were excellent in four elbows and good in two, with good varus-valgus stability in all. Radiological follow-up showed no appreciable signs of loosening, and the bone grafts had retained most of their original size, with minimal resorption. There were no major complications such as dislocation, skin necrosis, infection or ulnar neuropathy.

The study has shown that the so-called mutilans elbow can be successfully replaced using a properly selected type of non-constrained, unlinked prosthesis with bone grafting of the major defects.

Purpose: We conducted a retrospective study of 20 total elbow prostheses GUEPAR humerocubital and humeroradial (G3) implanted in 19 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This anatomic metal-polyethylene prosthesis is available in a left and right model and in two sizes, large and small. A radial head prosthesis is now available in addition to the humerocubital prosthesis. The radial head prosthesis has an intramedullary metallic stem and a mobile polyethylene cup which comes in several sizes.

Material and methods: Among 20 prostheses implanted between 1997 and 2001, four were first-generation prostheses which did not have a radial head. At three to four years, these four prostheses developed valgus instability with deterioration of the polyethylene of the cubital piece requiring revision with a new generation GUEPAR associated with a radial head. This gave two good results and two failures revised with a semi-constrained prosthesis. For the 16 other cases of rheumatoid disease, the G3 humerocubital prosthesis associated with a radial head was inserted. These 16 prostheses were followed two years and were retained for this analysis. The posterior approach was used with inverted-V section of the triceps using the surgical technique recommended by the promoters. Patients had permanent severe to moderate pain. The Mayo Clinic score (1992 including daily life activities) was 33/100. Radiographically, seven elbows were Larsen grade III, nine grade IV, seven grade IIA and nine grade IIIb (Larsen classification modified by the Mayo Clinic).

Results: All patients were reviewed with mean follow-up of two years (1–5). The Mayo Clinic score improved from 33/100 to33/90 with outcome considered excellent in 15 elbows and fair in one.

Discussion: We recommend total elbow prostheses for rheumatoid arthritis patients. Semi-constrained prostheses have indications in certain cases of massive destruction, but the minimally or non-constrained gliding prostheses, such as the GUEPAR prosthesis, are part of the evolution of these prostheses, just as was the case for knee prostheses. These good results can be expected to persist over time.

We studied 12 patients (13 elbows) who underwent total elbow replacement (TER) using the Kudo Mk IV or V prosthesis between 1989 and 1997. There were eight females and four males (mean age: 61 years, range: 38–74 years). The diagnosis was Rheumatoid arthritis in 10 patients and osteoarthritis in two patients. In each patient the initial result was classified as either excellent or good. All these patients then reported the recurrence of severe pain at a mean of four years from the time of the primary operation. Radiographic examination demonstrated fracture of the humeral stem in 10 elbows and subluxation of the joint in three elbows. The fractured humeral components were exchanged for long stem components. The three subluxated elbows were found to have undergone delamination and loosening of the ulnar components which were revised. One of these required revision to a linked prosthesis due to bone loss.

In each case metallosis was found involving principally the synovial tissues which were as far as possible excised. Each patient regained a similar range of movement to that following the primary arthroplasty but continues to experience episodes of pain requiring anti-inflammatory medication. This is in contrast to our patients requiring revision procedures for implant loosening or instability who have become pain free.

We conclude that the development of metallosis complicating mechanical implant failure predisposes to persisting symptoms following revision arthroplasty and recommend that this should be undertaken sooner rather than later when mechanical failure is detected.

From 1984 to 1995, 68 ankylosed elbows and 11 which were unstable after trauma were replaced in India by Baksi sloppy hinge prostheses. The mean age of the patients was 28.6 years (17 to 70) and the mean follow-up 9.6 years (2 to 13.5).

Of the 68 ankylosed elbows, 59 (87%) regained a mean arc of painless movement of 88.5° (27 to 115). The mean improvement of supination was 24° and of pronation 16.5°. There were 54 good results (80%), eight fair and three poor. There were two complete failures due to infection, and one due to a broken humeral stem.

Of the 11 unstable elbows, the nine with good results had a mean arc of 125° (15 to 140) of painless stable movement, with a mean improvement in supination of 26° and of pronation of 19.5°. There was one fair result and one failure due to loosening with subsequent late infection.

There were significant complications in 14 cases with infection in seven and aseptic loosening in four. Patients with loosening or late removal of the prosthesis often retained reasonably stable elbow movement because periprosthetic fibrosis had connected the approximated bone ends, and muscle balance had been restored.

To measure any observed migration and rotation of humeral and ulnar components using radiostereometric analysis. From 2002–2004 in a prospective ongoing study, twelve elbows in patients treated with either a linked or unlinked Acclaim total elbow prosthesis were included in a radiostereometry study. Six tantalum markers were introduced into the humerus another three markers were located on a humeral component. Four markers were placed in to ulna and three markers located on the ulnar component. RSA radiographs were taken postoperatively, six, twelve and twenty-four months. The radiographs were digitised and analysed using UmRSA software. The relative movement of the humeral and ulnar implants with respect to the bone was measured. At twelve months, the largest segment translation of the humeral component was in the anterior/posterior direction with a mean of 0.44mm followed by medial/lateral translation of 0.39 mm; there was minimal proximal/ distal translation or with a mean of 0.16mm. Paired t-tests between twelve and 24 months segment translation data showed the mean differences to be no more than 0.056mm. The largest rotation at twelve months was anteversion/retroversion with a mean of 2.40deg, anterior tilt had a mean of 1.20deg and varus/valgus tilt was minimal mean 0.60deg. Mean difference between twelve and 24 months segment rotation was no more than 0.30deg. In contrast, humeral tip motion produced a mean of 1.1mm at 12 months dominated by movement in the plane horizontal plane with a mean difference at 24 months of 0.06mm. No patients could be measured for segment micromotion of the ulnar component due to technical difficulty in visualising tantalum markers in the ulna. Early micromotion of the Acclaim humeral implant occurs mostly by rotation about the vertical axis accompanied by anterior tilt. This motion reaches a plateau at 12 months after operation.

Purpose: Anterior flanges have been added to the humeral components of some total elbow arthroplasty systems. Surgeons have the option of placing a wedge of bone or bone cement between the anterior surface of the humerus and the flange in an effort to improve implant stability and load transfer. The purpose of this study was to quantify the cortical strains in the humerus after arthroplasty for different materials placed behind the flange.

Methods: Five fresh-frozen cadaveric distal humeri were thawed and cleaned of all soft tissues. Strain gauges were applied to the anterior and posterior surfaces to record bending and axial strains. The bending gauges were positioned just proximal to the location of the flange tip. Cantilever bending and axial compression were applied using a materials testing machine. Following intact testing, the humeral component of a total elbow was implanted by an experienced surgeon and fixed using bone cement. Testing was repeated three times, each with a different material behind the flange: no graft (simulating a humeral component without an anterior flange), cancellous bone graft, and cement graft. Strains were normalized to the intact state and for the applied moments. Data were analyzed using repeated-measure ANOVAs (p< 0.05).

Results: For bending, the strain values were approximately 80% of the intact values with no graft material, 80% with the bone graft, and 87% with the cement graft. These differences among the graft materials were not significant (p=0.5). Similar results were found for the axial strains (p=0.3).

Conclusions: The intention of the anterior flange is to transfer a portion of the load carried by the implant stem to the distal humerus, thereby reducing stress-shielding and improving strength of the construct. In this investigation that employed bending and axial loads, the presence of an anterior flange had no significant effect on load transfer through the distal humerus regardless of graft material used. This would suggest that for the humeral component employed in this study, the flange might not be fulfilling its intended purpose.

Aims. The follow-up interval of a study represents an important aspect that is frequently mentioned in the title of the manuscript. Authors arbitrarily define whether the follow-up of their study is short-, mid-, or long-term. There is no clear consensus in that regard and definitions show a large range of variation. It was therefore the aim of this study to systematically identify clinical research published in high-impact orthopaedic journals in the last five years and extract follow-up information to deduce corresponding evidence-based definitions of short-, mid-, and long-term follow-up. Methods. A systematic literature search was performed to identify papers published in the six highest ranked orthopaedic journals during the years 2015 to 2019. Follow-up intervals were analyzed. Each article was assigned to a corresponding subspecialty field: sports traumatology, knee arthroplasty and reconstruction, hip-preserving surgery, hip arthroplasty, shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, hand and wrist, foot and ankle, paediatric orthopaedics, orthopaedic trauma, spine, and tumour. Mean follow-up data were tabulated for the corresponding subspecialty fields. Comparison between means was conducted using analysis of variance. Results. Of 16,161 published articles, 590 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 321 were of level IV evidence, 176 level III, 53 level II, and 40 level I. Considering all included articles, a long-term study published in the included high impact journals had a mean follow-up of 151.6 months, a mid-term study of 63.5 months, and a short-term study of 30.0 months. Conclusion. The results of this study provide evidence-based definitions for orthopaedic follow-up intervals that should provide a citable standard for the planning of clinical studies. A minimum mean follow-up of a short-term study should be 30 months (2.5 years), while a mid-term study should aim for a mean follow-up of 60 months (five years), and a long-term study should aim for a mean of 150 months (12.5 years). Level of Evidence: Level I. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(5):344–350

Abstract. Introduction. Intra-articular distal humerus OTA type C fractures are challenging to treat. When osteosynthesis is not feasible one can choose to do a primary arthroplasty of elbow or manage non-operatively. The indications for treatment of this fracture pattern are evolving. Objectives. We present our outcomes and complications when this cohort of patients was managed with either open reduction internal fixator (ORIF), elbow arthroplasty or non-operatively. Methods. Retrospective study to include OTA type C2 and C3 fracture distal humerus of 36 patients over the age of 50 years managed with all the three modalities. Patient's clinical notes and radiographs were reviewed. Results. Between 2016 and 2022, 21 patients underwent ORIF – group 1, 10 patients were treated with arthroplasty – group 2 and 5 were managed conservatively- group 3. The mean age of patients was 62 years in group 1, 70 years in group 2 and 76 years in group 3. The mean range of movement (ROM) arc achieved in the group 1 & 2 was 103 while group 3 was 68. At least follow up was 6 months. 5 patients in group 1 underwent metalwork removal and 2 patients in group 3 under arthroplasty. Conclusion. The outcomes of arthroplasty and ORIF are comparable, but reoperation rates and stiffness were higher in ORIF and conservative group. Surgeon choice and patient factors play important role in decision towards choosing treatment modality. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

The June 2013 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360 . looks at: whether suture anchors are still the gold standard; infection and revision elbow arthroplasty; the variable success of elbow replacements; sliding knots; neurologic cuff pain and the suprascapular nerve; lies, damn lies and statistics; osteoarthritis; and one- or two-stage treatment for the infected shoulder revision

Introduction. The epicondylar axis of the elbow is a surface anatomical approximation of the true flexion-extension (F-E) axis used in the application of an external fixator/elbow arthroplasty. We hypothesise that the epicondylar axis coincides with the true F-E axis in terms of both angular displacement and position (ie. offset). This suggests that it can serve as a good landmark in total dynamic external fixator application and elbow arthroplasty. Methods. Three-dimensional elbow models were obtained through manual segmentation and reconstruction from 142±40 slices of CT scans per elbow in 15 cadeveric specimens. Epicondylar axis was defined to be the axis through the 2 epicondyles manually identified on the elbow models. F-E axis was defined to be the normal of a circle fitted on 20 points identified on the trochlear groove. The long axis of the elbow was identified through a line fit through the center of the distal humerus on several slices along the elbow CT. Angle between the long axis and epicondylar axis was measured. Angular deviation of the epicondylar axis and the F-E axis was calculated in reference to the long axis. All axes were projected onto the orthogonal planes on the elbow CTs and all measurements were repeated. Angular differences in the axial, saggital and coronal planes are described in internal/external rotation, flexion/extension and valgus/varus respectively. Offset in the axial and coronal planes are described in the following directions respectively: proximal/distal and anterior/posterior respectively. Comparisons between angles were performed using student's t-test. Results. Angle between the long axis and the epicondylar axis in our study (85.9±5.30) was not significantly different when compared to an existing study (87.3±2.80) (p=0.327). The epicondylar axis deviates from the true F-E axis by 1.9±4.50 (p=0.523) in flexion, 2.1±3.40 (p=0.442) varus, and 0.5±2.70 (p=0.851) in external rotation with an overall angular deviation of 2.2±4.80 (p=0.204). There was no statistical significance difference in the angle deviations mentioned. The offset between the epicondylar axis and the F-E axis was 15.6±3.4 mm anterior and 9.4±2.9 mm distal with an overall offset of 17.6±2.5 mm. Discussion. Our study demonstrated small and statistically insignificant angular difference between the epicondylar axis and the F-E axis. However, offset between the axes exists and may be clinically significant. When the epicondylar axis is used as an approximation to the natural F-E axis, this offset may introduce a moment on elbow flexion resulting in additional strain on the elbow collateral ligaments and dynamic external fixators. Implications of this as well as ligament balancing and implant stress-strain patterns in elbow arthroplasty merit further research with potential modification of technique and jigs. Significance. Although the angular difference between between the epicondylar and F-E axes was not statistically significant, an offset between the axes exist. Further research is required to elucidate its impact and the need for modification on elbow implants and external fixators

The August 2014 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360 . looks at: Myofibroblasts perhaps not implicated in post-traumatic elbow stiffness; olecranon tip biomechanically sound for coranoid reconstruction; obesity and elbow replacement don’t mix; single column plating successful for extra-articular distal humeral fractures; satisfaction not predictable in frozen shoulder; tenodesis and repair both acceptable in Grade II SLAP tears; glenoid bone grafting is effective and glenohumeral articular lesions best seen with an arthroscope

The December 2014 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360 . looks at: cuff tears and plexus injury; . corticosteroids and physiotherapy in SAI; diabetes and elbow arthroplasty; distal biceps tendon repairs; shockwave therapy in frozen shoulder; hydrodilation and steroids for adhesive capsulitis; just what do our patients read?; and what happens to that stable radial head fracture?

To date there has been only one published series of elbow arthroplasty in patients with Juvenile Idiopathic arthritis. These patients pose particular problems because of the size and variable shape of the humerus and ulna together with the soft tissue contractures and bony erosion which can sometimes be severe. We have reviewed the results of elbow arthroplasty using the unlinked Kudo 5 and the linked Coonrad-Morrey implants which in our practice have different indications dependent upon bone stock and stability. Methods 19 total elbow replacements in 13 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis were performed by 1 specialist elbow surgeon, the senior author. 13 of these are Kudo 5 and 6 are Coonrad-Morrey implants. The mean age at operation was 39 years. 6 of the elbow replacements had undergone previous surgery, 4 had an interposition arthroplasty and 2 a synovectomy and radial head excision. No patients were lost to follow up. All were evaluated at a mean follow up of 49 months [6–84 months] using the Mayo Clinic Performance Index. Postoperative radiographs were also reviewed for loosening using standard anteroposterior and lateral films. Results Preoperatively 7 had moderate pain and 12 had severe pain. Postoperatively the pain was rated as none by 13 and mild by 6. The average Mayo Elbow Score improved from 26 preoperatively to 81 postoperatively. The mean arc of flexion/extension improved from 85 to 108 degrees.12 elbow replacements had intra and post-operative complications and 2 elbows have been revised. Conclusions The medium-term results of Total Elbow Replacements in patients with Juvenile Chronic Arthritis are acceptable and comparable to the only other published series which also records a high complication rate

The October 2013 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360 . looks at: Deltoid impairment not necessarily a contra-indication for shoulder arthroplasty; The tricky radiograph; Not so asymptomatic cuff tears; Total shoulder arthroplasty: kinder on the glenoid; Barbotage for calcific tendonitis; What happens to the arthritic glenoid?; Two screws a screw too few?; Sloppy hinge best for elbow arthroplasty

Background: To date there has been only one published series of elbow arthroplasty in patients with Juvenile Idiopathic arthritis. These patients pose particular problems because of the size and variable shape of the humerus and ulna together with the soft tissue contractures and bony erosion which can sometimes be severe. We have reviewed the results of elbow arthroplasty using the unlinked Kudo 5 and the linked Coonrad-Morrey implants which in our practice have different indications dependent upon bone stock and stability. Methods: 19 total elbow replacements in 13 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis were performed by 1 specialist elbow surgeon, the senior author. 13 of these are Kudo 5 and 6 are Coonrad-Morrey implants. The mean age at operation was 39 years. 6 of the elbow replacements had undergone previous surgery, 4 had an interposition arthroplasty and 2 a synovectomy and radial head excision. No patients were lost to follow up. All were evaluated at a mean follow up of 49 months [6–84 months] using the Mayo Clinic Performance Index. Postoperative radiographs were also reviewed for loosening using standard anteroposterior and lateral films. Results: Preoperatively 7 had moderate pain and 12 had severe pain. Postoperatively the pain was rated as none by 13 and mild by 6. The average Mayo Elbow Score improved from 26 preoperatively to 81 postoperatively. The mean arc of flexion/extension improved from 85 to 108 degrees.12 elbow replacements had intra and postoperative complications. 2 elbows have been revised, 1 for malalignment resulting in instability and 1 for aseptic loosening of the ulna component. 1 customised extra small implant has radiographic loosening of both components with minimal pain and a further aseptic loose implant awaits revision at 7 years. Conclusions: The medium-term results of Total Elbow Replacements in patients with Juvenile Chronic Arthritis are acceptable and comparable to the only other published series which also records a high complication rate similar to that reported by ourselves

Aim: Patients with advanced rheumatoid arthritis who were managed with ipsilateral shoulder and elbow arthroplasties were reviewed to determine appropriate sequence of surgery, operative technique and the functional outcome. Methods: Between 1992 and 2002, twenty-two patients underwent ipsilateral elbow and shoulder arthroplasties. Nineteen patients were available for final review. Clinical and radiological assessments were done on these patients. Results: Twenty-four upper limbs in nineteen patients were reviewed. Mean age at final follow-up was 61.1 years (49.9 to 73.3yrs; SD 8.2). Mean duration of follow-up from the last operation was 55.5 months (12 to 129.3m; SD 33.5). The average interval between the operations was 40.1 months; it was 41.2 months when elbow operated first and 38.7 months when shoulder was operated first. This difference was not significant (p=0.82). All movements showed significant improvement after respective joint replacements. There was a significantly greater improvement in external rotation of the shoulder when it was operated first (p=0.48). The average improvement in Constant-Murley scores was 28.8 points; with no statistically significant difference between either sequence of operations (p=0.49). However, there was statistically significant improvement in the average Mayo elbow performance score after the elbow arthroplasty when it was operated first (p=0.03). Two patients needed conversion of shoulder hemi-arthroplasty to total shoulder replacement due to subsequent erosion of the glenoid. One elbow replacement was revised because of recurrent dislocations. There were four patients who developed ulnar neuropathy, of which two were permanent. There were no peri-prosthetic fractures in this series. One patient needed custom-made short-stemmed shoulder prosthesis due to the presence of a long-stemmed humeral component of total elbow prosthesis in situ. Conclusion: Ipsilateral shoulder and elbow replacements significantly improve pain and function of the limb, when there is advanced arthritis. The joint that appears clinically and radiologically worse should be replaced first. However if both the joints are equally involved we feel that elbow should be replaced first as the functional improvement seems to be better. Careful preoperative planning is required in choosing the type and size of prosthesis, to avoid potential complications

The February 2015 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360 . looks at: Proximal Humerus fractures a comprehensive review, Predicting complications in shoulder ORIF, The Coronoid Revisited, Remplissage and bankart repair for Hill-Sach’s lesions, Diabetes and elbow arthroplasty, Salvage surgery for failed bankart repair, Sternoclavicular Joint Reconstruction, Steroids effective in the short-term for tennis elbow