Aims. To identify the incidence and risk factors for five-year same-site recurrent disc herniation (sRDH) after primary single-level lumbar discectomy. Secondary outcome was the incidence and risk factors for five-year sRDH reoperation. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted using prospectively collected data and patient-reported outcome measures, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), between 2008 and 2019. Postoperative sRDH was identified from clinical notes and the centre’s MRI database, with all imaging providers in the region checked for missing events. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate five-year sRDH incidence. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent variables predictive of sRDH, with any variable not significant at the p < 0.1 level removed. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results. Complete baseline data capture was available for 733 of 754 (97.2%) consecutive patients. Median follow-up time for censored patients was 2.2 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1.0 to 5.0). sRDH occurred in 63 patients at a median 0.8 years (IQR 0.5 to 1.7) after surgery. The five-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for sRDH was 12.1% (95% CI 9.5 to 15.4), sRDH reoperation was 7.5% (95% CI 5.5 to 10.2), and any-procedure reoperation was 14.1% (95% CI 11.1 to 17.5). Current smoker (HR 2.12 (95% CI 1.26 to 3.56)) and higher preoperative ODI (HR 1.02 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.03)) were independent risk factors associated with sRDH. Current smoker (HR 2.15 (95% CI 1.12 to 4.09)) was an independent risk factor for sRDH reoperation. Conclusion. This is one of the largest series to date which has identified current smoker and higher preoperative disability as independent risk factors for sRDH. Current smoker was an independent risk factor for sRDH reoperation. These findings are important for spinal surgeons and rehabilitation specialists in risk assessment, consenting patients, and perioperative management. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(3):315–322

Aim. To compare outcomes of revision lumbar discectomy to primary surgery in the same patient cohort. Methods. Prospective outcome data in 36 patients who underwent primary and subsequent revision surgery for lumbar disc herniation between 1995 and 2009. Outcome measures used were Visual Analogue Scores for back (VAB) and leg pain (VAL), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Low Back Outcome Score (LBO). 5 early recurrences within 3 months were excluded. Results. Complete data was available in 31 patients 13F;18M. The average age was 39 years at index and 45 years at revision. Average interval between surgery of 39 months (range 6-122). Mean Pre op ODI 54 and VAL 73 primary procedure, final follow up of primary procedure ODI 33, VAL 43; prior to revision ODI 57, VAL 75; at last FU ODI 32 and VAL 40. There was no statistical difference between outcomes. In the primary discectomy group there was a statistically significant improvement in the VAL, ODI and LBO scores (P<0.05), with no significant improvement in the VAB (P=0.67). In the revision group there was a statistical significant improvement in all the outcomes (P<0.05). Overall, 45% of patients felt their outcome from revision discectomy was better/much better with 54% of patients rating their treatment as either good/excellent. Conclusion. Primary discectomy produced significant improvement in leg pain, ODI and LBO. Revision discectomy did the same, but also a significant improvement in VAB scores. There was no statistically significant difference in comparing the preoperative and postoperative scores for both procedures. Revision discectomy is a procedure which yields clinically significant and patient perceived improvements in spinal outcome measures with an unexplained improvement in VAB scores as compared to the primary procedure. This may challenge the belief of some surgeons in the need for fusion at the time of revision

Background: The usefulness of open (fenestration/ laminotomy) discectomy for the treatment of a herniated lumbar disc has been studied extensively. In the current prospective, randomized study, the results of this procedure were compared with those of Microendoscopic discectomy. Methods: One hundred and twelve patients who had objective evidence of a single level, central or para-central herniation of a lumbar disc caudal to the first lumbar vertebra were randomized into two groups; Group 1 (55 patients) was managed with Microendoscopic discectomy, and Group 2 (57 patients) was managed with open (fenestration/ laminotomy) discectomy. None of the patients had had a previous operation on the low back, and all had failed to respond to nonoperative measures. Analysis of the outcomes of both procedures was based on the patient’s self-evaluation before and after the operation through Oswestry scoring, the preoperative and postoperative clinical findings, and the patient’s ability to return to a functional status. The patients were followed at one week, 6 weeks, 6 months and for a minimum of one year postoperatively. Results: On the basis of the patient’s preoperative and postoperative self-evaluation, the findings on physical examination, and the patient’s ability to return to work or to normal activity, 53 patients (96 percent) in Group 1 and 54 patients (95 percent) in Group 2 were considered to have had a satisfactory outcome. The mean surgical time, mean anaesthesia time, postoperative stay, was significantly less in Group 1. The overall satisfaction score was higher after the endoscopic microdiscectomies than after the laminotomies and discectomies especially in immediate postoperative period (one and six weeks) as assessed through Oswestry scoring. Conclusions: The data from this randomized, prospective study suggest that Microendoscopic discectomy may be useful for the operative treatment of specific symptoms, including radiculopathy, that are caused by lumbar disc herniation, provided that patients are properly selected—that is, they must have a herniated disc at a single level as confirmed on imaging studies, have failed to respond to nonoperative management and have no evidence of spinal stenosis. All the major advantages of an endoscopic procedure like less hospital stay, lesser morbidity, and early return to work can be passed on to the patients without in anyway compromising the surgical goals viz. decompression of the canal and the compressed nerve root. However, endoscopic microdiscectomy is a demanding technique and should not be attempted without specific instruction and training

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the results of Micro Endoscopic Discectomy (MED) toMicro Surgical Discectomy (MSD). Methods: 12 Patients were reviewed by an independent observer. This included the þrst 6 patients who underwent MED and 6 patients who underwent MSD selected randomly. There was no signiþcant difference between the two groups concerning age and sex distribution, occupation, preoper-ative time of work and clinical symptomatology. The disc herniations were located at L4-5 in 6 patients and L5-S1 in 6 patients. Patients were followed up for an average of 9 months (Range 2–22 months). They were assessed using the following questionnaires Oswestry low back pain and disability, Modiþed Gre-enough and Fraser and Mc Nab. Results: Both groups faired equally according to Mc Nab. The MED group appeared to require less postoperative analgesia especially opioid based preparations and were discharged earlier. The only complication was one patient in the MED requiring conversion to MSD. Conclusion: Our results indicate that MED is at least as effective as MSD, although it initially takes longer to perform due to the learning curve. However, the decrease in postoperative analgesia requirements and earlier discharge is beneþcial. In addition, we feel it has advantages over the percutaneous posterolateral discectomy for nerve root compression, which cannot treat sequestrated discs, or patients with disc herniations associated with recess stenosis

Introduction: This study is performed to investigate the efficacy of steroid, local anaesthesia (LA) or combination of both in reducing post operative pain in lumbar discectomy. Materials and Methods: The study was ethically approved. Patients undergoing primary single level lumbar discectomy were randomised by a closed envelope system into 4 groups of 1ml of steroid and 1ml of LA, 1ml of steroid and 1ml of saline, 1ml of LA and 1ml of saline and 2mls of saline as control. 10mg of adcortyl in 1ml and 1ml of 0.5% marcaine were used. Combinations of above were applied topically over the nerve root prior to closure. Preoperative, day 1 and eight weeks post operative visual analogue pain score were recorded. 10cm visual analogue pain score chart was used. 24 hours post operative opiate analgesia requirements and duration of inpatient stay were recorded. Data was analysed using Student t-test and Fisher exact t-test. Results: No significant differences seen in the mean pre operative pain score between all groups. Mean Day 1 post operative pain and analgesia requirement in steroid and LA, steroid only, LA only and control group were 0.9, 2.5, 2.1 and 3.3 respectively. Mean opiate analgesia requirement 24 hours post operatively were 32.4mg, 54mg, 32.4mg and 56.8mg respectively. Mean inpatient stay were 2.2day, 3.91day, 4.62day and 3.63day respectively. At 8 weeks post operatively, no significant differences in the pain score in all groups. Conclusions: Significant post operative pain reduction was achieved in the steroid and local anaesthesia group compared with other groups (p< 0.05). The results are reflected as well in significant reduction in the post operative analgesia requirement (p< 0.05) and the significant reduction in inpatient stay. (p< 0.05) We recommended the use of perioperative steroid and LA infiltration in lumbar discectomy. Improved post operative pain control reduces post operative opiate analgesia requirement and reduced inpatient stay

Aims. Open discectomy (OD) is the standard operation for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), however, has shown similar outcomes to OD and there is increasing interest in this procedure. However despite improved surgical techniques and instrumentation, reoperation and infection rates continue and are reported to be between 6% and 24% and 0.7% and 16%, respectively. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of reoperation and infection within six months of patients being treated for LDH either by OD or PELD. Methods. In this retrospective, nationwide cohort study, the Korean National Health Insurance database from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2018 was reviewed. Data were extracted for patients who underwent OD or PELD for LDH without a history of having undergone either procedure during the preceding year. Individual patients were followed for six months through their encrypted unique resident registration number. The primary endpoints were rates of reoperation and infection during the follow-up period. Other risk factors for reoperation and infection were also evalulated. Results. Out of 549,531 patients, 522,640 had undergone OD (95.11%) and 26,891 patients had undergone PELD (4.89%). Reoperation rates within six months were 2.28% in the OD group, and 5.38% in the PELD group. Infection rates were 1.18% in OD group and 0.83% in PELD group. The risk of reoperation was lower for patients with OD than for patients with PELD (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.38). The risk of infection was higher for patients with OD than for patients undergoing PELD (HR, 1.325). Conclusion. Compared with the OD group, the PELD group showed higher reoperation rates and lower infection rates. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(8):1392–1399

Introduction. This study was performed to investigate the efficacy of steroid and local anaesthesia (LA) in reducing post-operative pain in lumbar discectomy. Materials and methods. The study was ethically approved. Patients undergoing primary single level lumbar discectomy were randomised by a closed envelope system into 4 groups, which were (Group 1) 10mg of adcortyl in 1ml and 1ml of 0.5% marcaine, (Group 2) 10mg of adcortyl and 1ml of normal saline, (Group 3) 1ml of 0.5% marcaine and 1ml of normal saline and (Group 4) 2mls of normal saline as control. Combinations of the above were applied topically over the nerve root prior to closure. Pre-operative, day 1 and eight weeks post-operative pain scores were recorded. 24 hours post-operative opiate analgesia requirements and duration of inpatient stay were recorded. Data were analysed using student t-test for statistical significance. Results. 100 patients were recruited into the study. There were no significant differences seen in the mean age, gender and the mean pre-operative pain score between all groups. Mean day one pain score in groups 1,2,3 and 4 was 0.9,2.5, 2.1 and 3.3 respectively. Mean 24 hours post-operative opiate requirement was 32.4mg, 54mg, 48.8mg and 56.4mg respectively. Mean inpatient stay was 2.2 days, 3.9 days, 4.62 days and 3.63 days respectively. A significant different (p<0.05) was noted in day one post-operative mean pain score, mean 24 opiate requirement and mean inpatient stay in the corticosteroid and LA group. At 8 weeks post-operatively, no significant differences were seen in the pain score in all groups. Conclusions. Significant early post-operative pain reduction was achieved in the steroid and local anaesthesia group compared with other groups (p<0.05). A significant reduction in the 24-post operative analgesia requirement (p<0.05) and in inpatient stay (p<0.05) was also observed

Aims. Lumbar disc prolapse is a frequent indication for surgery. The few available long-term follow-up studies focus mainly on repeated surgery for recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to analyze all reasons for additional surgery for patients operated on for a primary lumbar disc prolapse. Methods. We retrieved data from the Swedish spine register about 3,291 patients who underwent primary surgery for a lumbar disc prolapse between January 2007 and December 2008. These patients were followed until December 2020 to record all additional lumbar spine operations and the reason for them. Results. In total, 681 of the 3,291 patients (21%) needed one or more additional operations. More than three additional operations was uncommon (2%; 15/906). Overall, 906 additional operations were identified during the time period, with a mean time to the first of these of 3.7 years (SD 3.6). The most common reason for an additional operation was recurrent disc prolapse (47%; 426/906), followed by spinal stenosis or degenerative spondylolisthesis (19%; 176/906), and segmental pain (16%; 145/906). The most common surgical procedures were revision discectomy (43%; 385/906) and instrumented fusion (22%; 200/906). Degenerative spinal conditions other than disc prolapse became a more common reason for additional surgery with increasing length of follow-up. Most patients achieved the minimally important change (MIC) for the patient-reported outcomes after the index surgery. After the third additional spinal operation, only 20% (5/25) achieved the MIC in terms of leg pain, and 29% (7/24) in terms of the EuroQol five-dimension index questionnaire visual analogue scale. Conclusion. More than one in five patients operated on for a lumbar disc prolapse underwent further surgery during the 13-year follow-up period. Recurrent disc prolapse was the most common reason for additional surgery, followed by spinal stenosis and segmental pain. This study shows that additional operations after primary disc surgery are needed more frequently than previously reported, and that the outcome profoundly deteriorates after the second additional operation. The findings from this study can be used in the shared decision-making process. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):627–632

Aims. The escalating demand for medical resources to address spinal diseases as society ages is an issue that requires careful evaluation. However, few studies have examined trends in spinal surgery, especially unscheduled hospitalizations or surgeries performed after hours, through large databases. Our study aimed to determine national trends in the number of spine surgeries in Japan. We also aimed to identify trends in after-hours surgeries and unscheduled hospitalizations and their impact on complications and costs. Methods. We retrospectively investigated data extracted from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a representative inpatient database in Japan. The data from April 2010 to March 2020 were used for this study. We included all patients who had undergone any combination of laminectomy, laminoplasty, discectomy, and/or spinal arthrodesis. Results. This investigation included 739,474 spinal surgeries and 739,215 hospitalizations in Japan. There was an average annual increase of 4.6% in the number of spinal surgeries. Scheduled hospitalizations increased by 3.7% per year while unscheduled hospitalizations increased by 11.8% per year. In-hours surgeries increased by 4.5% per year while after-hours surgeries increased by 9.9% per year. Complication rates and costs increased for both after-hours surgery and unscheduled hospitalizations, in comparison to their respective counterparts of in-hours surgery and scheduled hospitalizations. Conclusion. This study provides important insights for those interested in improving spine care in an ageing society. The swift surge in after-hours spinal surgeries and unscheduled hospitalizations highlights that the medical needs of an increasing number of patients due to an ageing society are outpacing the capacity of existing medical resources. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(8):662–670

Although interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) is considered to be less invasive than microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD) in treatment of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus, the radiologic change of multifidus muscles by each surgery has rarely been reported. The aim of the present study was to compare the quantitative and qualitative changes of multifidus muscles between two surgical approaches and to analyze the correlation between various parameters of multifidus muscles and long term surgical outcome. 21 patients who received MLD and 18 patients who received IELD in a single tertiary hospital were enrolled and their preoperative, postoperative (≤15 days), and follow-up (≥6 months) MRIs were analyzed. The cross-sectional area (CSA) and fatty degeneration rate (FD) were quantitatively estimated at the level of surgery. The correlations among CSA, FD, body mass index, follow-up visual analogue scale(VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) were assessed. Mean intervals of postoperative MRI and follow-up MRI from surgery were 3.0±3.7 days and 14.5±10.7 months, respectively. During the follow-up period, VAS was improved from 7.1±1.3 to 2.1±1.8 in MLD and from 8.2±1.4 to 2.2±1.8 in IELD. In cases of MLD, comparing with preoperative MRI, ipsilateral CSA was significantly increased in postoperative MRI (795.6mm. 2. vs. 906.5mm. 2. , p<0.01), but it was not significantly different in follow-up MRI (795.6mm. 2. vs. 814.4mm. 2. , p=1.00). However, in case of IELD, the ipsilateral CSAs in preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up periods were 892.0 mm. 2. , 909.3 mm. 2. , and 900.3 mm. 2. , respectively. These changes were not significant over time (p=0.691). The ipsilateral FDs were not significantly changed between preoperative and follow-up periods in both MLD (21.4% vs. 20.9%, p=0.81) and IELD groups (23.5% vs. 21.8%, p=0.19). The increment of ipsilateral CSA had significant correlations with follow-up ODI (r=−0.368, p=0.02). Comparing with IELD, MLD induced more surgical trauma on multifidus muscle in postoperative period, but the muscular damage was recovered in follow-up period. IELD can minimize surgical trauma on multifidus muscle showing similar pain relief as MLD. Favorable surgical outcome in follow-up period may be related to increment of multifidus muscle volume. Figure 1. (A-C) The multifidus muscles in preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up periods, respectively, in patient with MLD. Comparing with preoperative period, the CSA of right multifidus muscle (ipsilateral side) was increased in postoperative period, but recovered in follow-up period. (D-F) The multifidus muscle in preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up periods, respectively, in patient with IELD. The CSA of left multifidus muscles (ipsilateral side) was not significantly changed over time. Comparing preoperative MRIs with follow-up MRIs, the FDs of multifidus muscles were not significantly changed regardless of surgical technique. Figure 2. The CSA was measured by marking region of interest (ROI) and FD was measured by calculating the rate of pixels beyond the threshold in ROI. All measurements were performed using ImageJ software (version 1.52a, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA). For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

We have studied 180 patients (128 men and 52 women) who had undergone lumbar discectomy at a mean of 25.4 years (20 to 32) after operation. Pre-operatively, most patients (70 patients; 38.9%) had abnormal reflexes and/or muscle weakness in the leg (96 patients; 53.3%). At follow-up 42 patients (60%) with abnormal reflexes pre-operatively had fully recovered and 72 (75%) with pre-operative muscle impairment had normal muscle strength. When we looked at patient-reported outcomes, we found that the Short form-36 summary scores were similar to the aged-matched normative values. No disability or minimum disability on the Oswestry disability index was reported by 136 patients (75.6%), and 162 (90%) were satisfied with their operation. The most important predictors of patients’ self-reported positive outcome were male gender and higher educational level. No association was detected between muscle recovery and outcome. Most patients who had undergone lumbar discectomy had long-lasting neurological recovery. If the motor deficit persists after operation, patients can still expect a long-term satisfactory outcome, provided that they have relief from pain immediately after surgery

Single level discectomy (SLD) is one of the most commonly performed spinal surgery procedures. Two key drivers of their cost-of-care are duration of surgery (DOS) and postoperative length of stay (LOS). Therefore, the ability to preoperatively predict SLD DOS and LOS has substantial implications for both hospital and healthcare system finances, scheduling and resource allocation. As such, the goal of this study was to predict DOS and LOS for SLD using machine learning models (MLMs) constructed on preoperative factors using a large North American database. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical and Quality Improvement (NSQIP) database was queried for SLD procedures from 2014-2019. The dataset was split in a 60/20/20 ratio of training/validation/testing based on year. Various MLMs (traditional regression models, tree-based models, and multilayer perceptron neural networks) were used and evaluated according to 1) mean squared error (MSE), 2) buffer accuracy (the number of times the predicted target was within a predesignated buffer), and 3) classification accuracy (the number of times the correct class was predicted by the models). To ensure real world applicability, the results of the models were compared to a mean regressor model. A total of 11,525 patients were included in this study. During validation, the neural network model (NNM) had the best MSEs for DOS (0.99) and LOS (0.67). During testing, the NNM had the best MSEs for DOS (0.89) and LOS (0.65). The NNM yielded the best 30-minute buffer accuracy for DOS (70.9%) and ≤120 min, >120 min classification accuracy (86.8%). The NNM had the best 1-day buffer accuracy for LOS (84.5%) and ≤2 days, >2 days classification accuracy (94.6%). All models were more accurate than the mean regressors for both DOS and LOS predictions. We successfully demonstrated that MLMs can be used to accurately predict the DOS and LOS of SLD based on preoperative factors. This big-data application has significant practical implications with respect to surgical scheduling and inpatient bedflow, as well as major implications for both private and publicly funded healthcare systems. Incorporating this artificial intelligence technique in real-time hospital operations would be enhanced by including institution-specific operational factors such as surgical team and operating room workflow

Aims. The aim of the study was to determine if there was a direct correlation between the pain and disability experienced by patients and size of their disc prolapse, measured by the disc’s cross-sectional area on T2 axial MRI scans. Methods. Patients were asked to prospectively complete visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores on the day of their MRI scan. All patients with primary disc herniation were included. Exclusion criteria included recurrent disc herniation, cauda equina syndrome, or any other associated spinal pathology. T2 weighted MRI scans were reviewed on picture archiving and communications software. The T2 axial image showing the disc protrusion with the largest cross sectional area was used for measurements. The area of the disc and canal were measured at this level. The size of the disc was measured as a percentage of the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal on the chosen image. The VAS leg pain and ODI scores were each correlated with the size of the disc using the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). Intraobserver reliability for MRI measurement was assessed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We assessed if the position of the disc prolapse (central, lateral recess, or foraminal) altered the symptoms described by the patient. The VAS and ODI scores from central and lateral recess disc prolapses were compared. Results. A total of 56 patients (mean age 41.1 years (22.8 to 70.3)) were included. A high degree of intraobserver reliability was observed for MRI measurement: single measure ICC was 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI) from 0.97 to 0.99 (p < 0.001)). The PCC comparing VAS leg scores with canal occupancy for herniated disc was 0.056. The PCC comparing ODI for herniated disc was 0.070. We found 13 disc prolapses centrally and 43 lateral recess prolapses. There were no foraminal prolapses in this group. The position of the prolapse was not found to be related to the mean VAS score or ODI experienced by the patients (VAS, p = 0.251; ODI, p = 0.093). Conclusion. The results of the statistical analysis show that there is no direct correlation between the size or position of the disc prolapse and a patient’s symptoms. The symptoms experienced by patients should be the primary concern in deciding to perform discectomy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):715–720

Objectives: A retrospective study of patients undergoing second operation after initial lumbar discectomy, to investigate the reasons associated. Methods: In a period of three years a total number of 30 patients had a reoperation after lumbar discectomy. The initial operation performed before one month to five years. There is a evaluation of intraoperative findings and of a short period of follow up. Data were obtained from Spine Unit of Errikos Dunan Hospital. Results: Among 30 patients, 60% were recurrent disc herniations, 18% were fusions and 22% were decompressions. The follow up is from two months to three years for 25 patients, 4 patients had further spinal surgery. Very satisfied, satisfied were 80% of patients. Conclusion: Although reoperation after lumbar discectomy is uncommon, it is very possible to face it because of the increasing number of initial discectomies performed

The recent NICE guidelines on management of osteoarthritis outline weight loss as first line treatment in degenerative joint disease in the obese. There is little data surrounding the effects of obesity on the outcomes in spinal surgical interventions. Intervertebral discectomy is one treatment for prolapse of a lumbar vertebral disc. We aim to investigate the effect of obesity on outcomes for discectomy. Demographic details including age, sex, weight and BMI were recording with a pre-operative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The fat thickness was measured at L5/S1 using calibrated MRI scans. Outcome measures included complications, length of surgery and change in ODI at 1 year following surgery. Obesity was defined as a body mass index of over 30. The units Serial patients undergoing discectomy were recruited into the study. Patients with bony decompression, instrumentation, revision surgery or multilevel disease were excluded. Fifty patients with a single level uncomplicated disc prolapse were entered into the study. Sixteen patients had a BMI over 30 and so were obese, whilst 34 had a BMI of less than 30. The mean pre-operative ODI was 46.5 in the obese group and 52 in the normal group this difference was not significant (p> 0.05). The mean post operative ODI was statistically improved in the high BMI group at 28 (18.5 point improvement) and 25.2 (29.1 point improvement) in the normal group. The ODI improvement was significantly better in the low BMI group (p=0.036). There was no significant difference in operative time (p=0.24). Only a single patient had a complication (dural leak), so no valid comparison could be made. The outcomes of spinal surgery in the obese are mixed. We found no increase in the complication rate or intra-operative time associated with an increased BMI. However, the improvement in ODI was significantly better in the normal BMI group

This paper describes the relationship between post-myelographic symptoms and the timing of a subsequent spinal operation. A prospective study was performed comparing the post-operative symptoms of patients who underwent discectomy within 48 hours of myelography (Group 1) with those of patients who underwent discectomy at least seven days after myelography (Group 2). After myelography there was no statistical difference in the incidence of nausea and headache in the two groups. However, after operation the incidence of headache and nausea was significantly greater in patients who underwent early discectomy. The incidence of urinary retention was significantly greater in Group 1 at 24 hours after operation but not at 48 and 72 hours. We conclude that the temptation to perform discectomy shortly after myelography should be resisted until at least one week has elapsed between the two procedures, except in emergency situations

Purpose: Persistent radiculopathy secondary to lumbar disc herniation is a common problem that greatly compromises quality of life. In North America, lumbar discectomies are among the most common elective surgical procedures performed. There is still much debate about when conservative or surgical treatments should be offered to patients. Although the related literature is comprehensive, there are limited systematic reviews on the prognostic factors predicting the outcome of lumbar discectomy. The purpose of this review is to define the preoperative factors predicting clinical outcome after lumbar discectomy. Method: We conducted a computerized literature search using Ovid Medline and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included randomized controlled trials or prospective studies dealing with lumbar disc surgery. The preoperative predictors had to be clearly identified and correlated with outcome measures in terms of pain, disability, work capacity, analgesia consumption, or a combination of these measures. We assessed the articles as high or low quality studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and summarized the results of High Quality Studies. Results: A total of 39 articles were included. The two most prominent negative predictors were Workers’ Compensation status and depression according to 6 studies. Poor predictors reported in 4 articles were female gender, increasing age, and prolonged duration of leg or back pain. Lower education level, smoking, and higher levels of psychological complaints were negative predictors in 3 articles. A positive Lasègue sign was a positive predictor in 7 articles. Absence of back pain, positive patient expectations, and higher income were good prognostic factors in 3 studies. Patients with contained herniations did worse than those who had uncontained disc extrusions and sequestrations according to 4 studies. The level of herniation was not a predictive factor in 7 studies. Conclusion: Workers’ Compensation, depression, greater back versus leg pain, increasing age, female gender, contained herniations, and prolonged symptoms predict unfavourable postoperative outcomes after lumbar discectomy. Positive Lasègue sign, higher income, uncontained herniations, and positive patient expectations predict favourable postoperative outcomes. The level of herniation is not an established prognostic factor. The results of this review provide a preliminary framework for patient selection for lumbar disc surgery

Purpose: Since 1990, we have used specific material, presented to us by T. Tajima (Japan) during his visit in 1989 for percutaneous surgical cervical discectomy. French material was developed in 1992. The purpose of this work is to present our experience with this technique over the last ten years. Material and methods: Indications were cervicobrachial neuralgia unresponsive to medical care and secondary to MRI or CT documented cervical disc herniation. We used the right anterolateral approach guided with the image amplifier for patients under local anaesthesia and neuroleptanalgesia ou general anaesthesia. A guide wire was positioned in the centre of the anterior aspect of the disc to insert a 2.5 mm working tube in the middle of the disc. A special trephin with an inverted inside thread induced an aspiration effect when turned into the disc, in line with the posterior wall of the vertebra. This enabled removal of several “carrots” measuring 1 to 2 cm long of discal or even disco-osteophytic material. The removal of the posterior third of the disc and the herniation was completed with a fine disc forceps. Results: There were 85 procedures in 82 patients, mean age 42 years (35 women, 47 men): 57 at one level, mainly C5C6, 27 at two levels simultaneously, and one at three levels during the same operation. Mean follow-up for the 80 results known was 15 months (3–90 months). There were nine failures (two required conventional surgical fusion), 14 fair results, and 57 good results, giving a total of 88.75% good and fair results. Unlike percutaneous surgical lumbar discectomy, where good results at three months may deteriorate at two years, good results at three months after percutaneous cervical discectomy remained good at two years. Discussion: This technique provides results as good as chemonucleolysis. An advantage of the technique that allergy or disco-osteophytic protrusions are not contraindications. We did not have any infection or injury to neighbouring tissue. Conclusion: When rigorous operative procedures are used in this area with potential risk, percutaneous surgical cervical discectomy can be a useful routine therapeutic tool

We performed a prospective study to examine the influence of the patient’s position on the location of the abdominal organs, to investigate the possibility of a true lateral approach for transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Pre-operative abdominal CT scans were taken in 20 patients who underwent endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Axial images in parallel planes of each intervertebral disc from L1 to L5 were achieved in both supine and prone positions. The most horizontal approach angles possible to avoid injury to the abdominal organs were measured. The results demonstrated that the safe approach angles were significantly less (i.e., more horizontal) in the prone than in the supine position. Obstacles to a more lateral approach were mainly the liver, the spleen and the kidneys at L1/2 (39 of 40, 97.5%) and L2/3 (28 of 40, 70.0%), and the intestines at L3/4 (33 of 40, 82.5%) and L4/5 (30 of 30, 100%). A true lateral approach from each side was possible for 30 of the 40 discs at L3/4 (75%) and 23 of the 30 discs at L4/5 (76.7%). We concluded that a more horizontal approach for transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy is possible in the prone position but not in the supine. Prone abdominal CT is more helpful in determining the trajectory of the endoscope. While a true lateral approach is feasible in many patients, our study shows it is not universally applicable.

Introduction: Repetitive undertaking of a physical tasks results in an innate memory for that task. Development of this memory is an important component of surgical training and the ease and safety with which these changes are incorporated into a smoothly flowing procedure is represented by the so-called “learning curve”. Changes in equipment and technology may radically alter the paradigm used by surgeons for completing the task of an operation. An example of this is the integration of endoscopy. The hand-eye orientation, field of view, angle of approach, binocularity of vision and skew of the visual field are all altered in lumbar micro-endoscopic discectomy (MED), when compared to open microdiscectomy. Methods: This is a prospective observational study of the initial twenty-five cases of lumbar MED in the hands of a single surgeon. The twenty-five cases of open micro-discectomy immediately predating the current series are used as a cohort for comparison. Results: A definite alteration in the ability of the surgeon to undertake a new method of discectomy occurred. Three of the first seven cases of MED were converted to an open discectomy. None of the ensuing 18 cases was converted. The major learning outcomes to account for the change were familiarity with the radiological and videoscopic anatomy, and recognition of the importance of angles of approach. The average time for surgery in the first ten cases was significantly longer than the second fifteen. The time for surgery in the latter group was not significantly altered from the open cohort group. The facets of surgery responsible for the increased time in the first group were techniques of exposing the nerve root, comfort of the extent of decompression of the nerve root and excision of the disc and comfort with the orientation and cleaning of the camera. The quality of illumination and visualisation of the operative field improved over the study although the significance of this could not be quantified. Subjectively, surgeon “comfort” with the procedure developed relatively early in the “learning curve”. There was no significant difference in clinical outcome and complications between the two groups. Discussion: Minimal access techniques have been widely integrated into other fields of surgical endeavour. Open microdiscectomy is well accepted as a treatment for acute lumbar disc prolapse. The decision whether or not to change a surgeon’s operative technique should be based on the final anticipated clinical benefit of such a change compared to the cost and risk of changing. This study shows that there is a learning curve associated with lumbar MED, but that it can be integrated relatively easily into a surgical armamentarium

INTRODUCTION: Repetitive undertaking of a physical task results in an innate memory for that task. Development of this memory is an important component of surgical training and the ease and safety with which these changes are incorporated into a smoothly flowing procedure is represented by the so-called “learning curve”. Changes in equipment and technology may radically alter the paradigm used by surgeons for completing the task of an operation. An example of this is the integration of endoscopy. The hand-eye orientation, field of view, angle of approach, binocularity of vision and skew of the visual field are all altered in lumbar microendoscopic discectomy (MED), when compared to open microdiscectomy. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of the initial twenty-five cases of lumbar MED in the hands of a single surgeon. The twenty-five cases of open microdiscectomy immediately predating the current series are used as a cohort for comparison. RESULTS: A definite alteration in the ability of the surgeon to undertake a new method of discectomy occurred. Three of the first seven cases of MED were converted to an open discectomy. None of the ensuing 18 cases was converted. The major learning outcomes to account for the change were familiarity with the radiological and videoscopic anatomy, and recognition of the importance of angles of approach. The average time for surgery in the first ten cases was significantly longer than the second fifteen. The time for surgery in the latter group was not significantly altered from the open cohort group. The facets of surgery responsible for the increased time in the first group were techniques of exposing the nerve root, comfort of the extent of decompression of the nerve root and excision of the disc and comfort with the orientation and cleaning of the camera. The quality of illumination and visualisation of the operative field improved over the study although the significance of this could not be quantified. Subjectively, surgeon “comfort” with the procedure developed relatively early in the “learning curve”. There was no significant difference in clinical outcome and complications between the two groups. DISCUSSION: Minimal access techniques have been widely integrated into other fields of surgical endeavour. Open microdiscectomy is well accepted as a treatment for acute lumbar disc prolapse. The decision whether or not to change a surgeon’s operative technique should be based on the final anticipated clinical benefit of such a change compared to the cost and risk of changing. This study shows that there is a learning curve associated with lumbar MED, but that it can be integrated relatively easily into a surgical armamentarium

Autologous chondrocyte transplantation is technically feasible and biologically relevant to repairing disc damage and retarding disc degeneration in animal models. Prospective clinical trials with open discectomy, cultivation of disc cells and transplantation by a minimally invasive procedure are ongoing (co.don chondro-transplant DISC). We used the decompressor (Stryker) for percutaneous lumbar discectomy to harvest disc cells for cultivation. A cannula was placed in the degenerated disc. The 1,5mm decompressor was introduced through the cannula. 0,5–1,5 millilitres of disc material was aspirated. In the laboratory the material was cultured using the patients serum. The cells were expandable. The capacity of the cells to produce matrix molecules was proven in vitro. The percutaneous discectomy of contained discs with signes of early degeneration, the expansion and the transplantation of autologous chondrocytes to the disc might be a possibility of repairing disc damage and retarding disc degeneration

Background: Traditionally, lumbar discectomy is performed under general anaesthesia because of ability to perform operations of long duration in prone position with a secure airway. Some recent reports suggest better outcomes with regional anaesthesia. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the intra-operative and short-term post-operative outcome variables in patients undergoing primary single-level lumbar discectomy with epidural and general anaesthesia. Methods: This was a prospective randomized trial involving sixty patients over a two-year period in a tertiary hospital in India. Patients were allocated into two groups: Group A (n=30) patients received general anaesthesia and Group B (n=30) patients received epidural anaesthesia. Baseline and intra-operative haemodynamic parameters, surgical duration, surgical onset time, intra-operative blood loss, cost incurred by patient, nausea and vomiting and post-operative pain score were also recorded. Results: The groups were comparable for demographic data and baseline hemodynamic observations. Patients in the epidural anaesthesia group had significantly lower blood loss (p< 0.001), lower peak pain scores (p< 0.001), lesser surgical time (p< 0.001),and significantly reduced post-operative nausea and vomiting (p< 0.01) as compared to the general anaesthesia group. The cost incurred for epidural anaesthesia was two third of that incurred in general anaesthesia (p< 0.001). Epidural group had significantly more surgical onset time (p< 0.001). Conclusion: Lumbar discectomy can be safely performed using epidural anaesthesia. The intra-operative blood loss, surgical duration, cost incurred by the patient, postoperative nausea, vomiting and pain are significantly reduced in patients receiving epidural anaesthesia, thereby leading to a significantly higher patient satisfaction. In the present climate of NHS, where any initiative to cut down the cost of resources consumed is welcomed as long as the patient safety is not compromised, epidural anaesthetic may provide an effective alternative to general anaesthetic for lumbar discectomy

Aim of the present study was to investigate clinical outcomes and quality of life after standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation on a minimum 25-year follow-up throughout validated tools. Between 1973 and 1979, a total of 343 patients underwent single or double level standard lumbar discectomy at the Orthopaedic Department of Naples Federico II University Hospital, Italy. Fifty patients died from causes unrelated to disc surgery. Out of the remnants, one hundred fifty-eight patients could be traced and contacted by mail (46.1% survey rate). All of them (100% response rate) completed and sent back three questionnaires: the official Italian version of the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, and a questionnaire ideated by the authors to evaluate the degree of satisfaction with surgery. Forty-two patients even accepted to undergo clinic examination. The study population consisted of 97 males and 61 females. The mean age at the time of surgery was 37.8 +/− 8.7 years (18–62), whereas on follow up it was 65.8 +/− 8.9 (44–89). The average follow up in the study group was 27 years (25–31). The eight SF-36 scales averaged 72.53 +/− 31.3 for physical functioning, 63.1 +/− 30.1 for bodily pain, 61.30 +/− 44.4 for role-physical, 54.57 +/− 22.2 for general health, 56.62 +/− 19.2 for vitality, 72.08 +/− 30 for social functioning, 67.56 +/− 41.4 for role-emotional, and 62.28 +/− 19 for mental health. The mean SF-36 physical composite score (PCS) and mental composite score (MCS) were 44.2 +/− 11.6 (17.3–64.5) and 45.7 +/− 9,9 (13.2–62.4), respectively. The mean Oswestry Disability Score was 16.67 +/− 22.82 (0–96). One hundred forty-two patients (89.9%) were satisfied with the results of surgery, whereas sixteen (10.1%) were dissatisfied. One hundred and one (89.2%) would have had the same operation again. Nineteen patients underwent recurrent back surgery, giving a reoperation rate of 12%. As for the objective findings, we noted slight improvement of motor disturbances, hyporeflexia, and radicular tension signs with respect to preoperative period. Lumbar alignment abnormalities and trunk mobility did not show significant changes. On multivariate analysis worst SF-36 PCS scores were associated with increasing age (P = 0.039), low educational level (P = 0.002), and reoperation (P = 0.008). Similar correlations were appreciated for the Oswestry Disability Score. Negative role of female gender (P = 0.012) in determining the score of SF-36 MCS was also detected. To the best of our knowledge, no patient-oriented evaluation of lumbar discectomy outcomes has been reported with a similar ultra-long-term follow-up. The minimum 25-year results obtained in the present study were satisfying for both general health and disability indicators. The general health scores were similar to age-adjusted normative values

The indications for lumbar discectomy are pain and neurological dysfunction. This paper considers the extent and timing of neurological recovery following spinal decompression

The optimum timing of lumbar discectomy for sciatica is imprecise. We have investigated a number of prognostic factors in relation to the outcome of radiculopathy after lumbar discectomy. We recruited 113 consecutive patients of whom 103 (91%) were followed up at one year. We found a significant association between the duration of radiculopathy and the changes in the Oswestry Disability Index score (p = 0.005) and the low back outcome score (p = 0.03). Improvement in pain was independent of all variables. Patients with an uncontained herniated disc had a shorter duration of symptoms and a better functional outcome than those with a contained herniation. Our study suggests that patients with sciatica for more than 12 months have a less favourable outcome. We detected no variation in the results for patients operated on in whom the duration of sciatica was less than 12 months

Introduction: Following surgical discectomy for pro-lapsed lumbar intervertebral disc, a proportion of patients develop leg symptoms on the side contra-lateral to the original surgery. Among other causes, subsequent disc space narrowing together with on-going degenerative changes may cause root entrapment in the lateral recess or in the intervertebral canal at the level of the previous disc prolapse. It has been previously reported that the results of discectomy are less successful in patients with pre-existing spinal stenosis. It may be argued that patients with a narrow spinal canal would be more prone to the development of contra-lateral symptoms. The aim of this study was to determine whether any measurement on the pre-operative CT scan could predict the development of contra-lateral symptoms, or provide an indication for prophylactic decompression of the contra-lateral side at the time of the original surgery. Materials & Methods: In a retrospective cohort of 43 patients following lumbar discectomy, eight subsequently developed symptoms on the contra-lateral side of whom three required subsequent contra-lateral surgery. A relationship was demonstrated between a measurement taken on the pre-operative CT scan (the oblique sub-facet distance) and the occurrence of contra-lateral symptoms following discectomy. Conclusion: An oblique sub-facet distance of 8mm or less predicted the development of contra-lateral symptoms with a sensitivity of 75 % and a specificity of 74%

Study Design: Retrospective review. Objectives: Rugby union has recently become a highly-paid professional sport. Players requiring anterior cervical discectomy wish to know the effect this will have on their career. To answer this question, the result of the above procedure in professional rugby players was studied. Methods: A retrospective notes review and telephone interview were conducted on 19 professional rugby players who had a cervical discectomy between 1998 and 2003. Pre and post operative symptoms and numbers returning to rugby after surgery were assessed. Results: Neck pain was eradicated in eight (42%) of the players, nine (47%) achieved partial relief and two were not helped. Brachalgia was eradicated in fifteen (79%) individuals, improved in two (10.5%) and two (10.5%) had no relief. Fourteen (74%) returned to rugby union, the majority at six months post operatively (range – five to 17 months). Thirteen (68.5%) returned to their pre-operative level of rugby; one dropped to a lesser division and five have never played rugby again (three due to physical inability, one due to club reluctance to insure and one because of a separate injury). Two of the players that returned to rugby have subsequently retired because of neck symptoms. They played three and two years post-operatively at first-class level. Conclusion: Return to rugby union after anterior cervical discectomy is both likely and safe and therefore need not be a career ending procedure

Objective: To extend the follow up period of previous studies undertaken by the senior author, looking at the clinical outcome and radiological changes observed in patients with either myelopathy or radiculopathy, following anterior cervical discectomy without fusion. Design: Prospective, observational cohort study of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy without fusion and followed up for five years, radiologically, with serial plain radiographs, and clinically, using validated outcome measures including SF36, neck disability index and analogue visual pain scores. Subjects: 109 Patients undergoing anterior cervical dis-cectomy without fusion under the senior author’s care. Outcome measures:. Radiological. Occurrence of segmental cervical kyphosis. Loss of overall cervical alignment. Clinical. SF36, Neck disability index, Visual analogue neck and arm pain scores. Results: A total cohort of 109 patients, of mean age 56 years, were followed up after anterior cervical discectomy without fusion, for up to 5 years. Segmental kyphosis was demonstrated on 44%, and loss of overall cervical alignment on 60% of follow up plain radiographs during the third postoperative year. In the cohorts of patients with either loss of cervical alignment or segmental kyphosis at one year the mean clinical outcome scores (Wilcoxon’s matched pairs signed ranks test) continued to improve at the 5 year follow up. The annual rate of loss of cervical alignment in patients unaffected at the first post operative year was around 10% but there was no significant rate of progression of segmental kyphosis. Comparison of the relationship between these radiological changes and clinical outcome (Mann-Whitney U test) did not show any significant correlation. Conclusions: This study assesses patients over the period during which the anticipated alignment changes associated with undertaking simple anterior cervical discectomy could be having progressive detrimental clinical effects. Where such radiological changes occur they most commonly occur during the first post operative year. However, clinical outcome measures in these patients all improve at one year follow up, and still continue to improve or plateau up to five years post operatively. As anticipated, the most significant clinical improvement, occurs during the first post operative year. During the longer follow up period there is no significant detrimental effect of the radiological changes discussed on clinical outcome

Recurrence of back or leg pain after discectomy is a well-recognised problem with an incidence of up to 28%. Once conservative measures have failed, several surgical options are available and have been tried with varying degrees of success. In this study, 42 patients with recurrent symptoms after discectomy underwent less invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (LI-PLIF). Clinical outcome was measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires and visual analogue scales for back (VAS-BP) and leg pain (VAS-LP). There was a statistically significant improvement in all outcome measures (p < 0.001). The debate around which procedure is the most effective for these patients remains controversial. Our results show that LI-PLIF is as effective as any other surgical procedure. However, given that it is less invasive, we feel that it should be considered as the preferred option

Introduction. Degeneration of the cervical spine can lead to neurological symptoms that require surgical intervention. Often, an anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) with fusion is performed with interposition of a cage. However, a cage substantially increases health care costs. The polymer polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is an alternative to cages, associated with lower costs. The reported high-occurrence of non-fusion with PMMA is often seen as a drawback, but evidence for a correlation between radiological fusion and clinical outcome is absent. To investigate if the lower rate of fusion with PMMA has negative effects on long-term clinical outcome, we assessed the clinical results of ACD with PMMA as a intervertebral spacer with a 5–10 year follow-up. Methods. A retrospective cohort study among all patients who underwent a mono-level ACD with PMMA for degenerative cervical disease, between 2007–2012, was performed. Patients filled out an online questionnaire, developed to assess clinical long-term outcome, complications and re-operation rates. The primary outcome measure was the Neck Disability Index (NDI), secondary outcome measures were re-operation and complication rates. Results. Of 196 eligible patients, 90 patients were assessed (response rate 53%). The average NDI score at follow-up (mean 7.5 years) was 19.0 points ± 18.0 points. Complications occurred in 10% and re-operation in 8.8%. Conclusion. This study provides evidence of good long-term clinical results of ACD with PMMA, as the results were similar with long-term outcomes of ACD with a cage as spacer. Therefore, the results of this study may suggest that the use of PMMA is an lower-cost alternative. No conflicts of interests. No funding obtained

Objective: To identify risk factors associated with patients that required revision surgery for sciatica. Design: A retrospective study of 580 patients who underwent surgery for intractable sciatica attributable to pro-lapsed lumbar intervertebral disc from 1986 to 2000 inclusive. Subjects: The study included a total of 580 patients. Of these seven patients had an operation at two levels, 25 patients had had a primary operation elsewhere and were therefore excluded; four sets of notes remain missing. The total number of primary operations analysed was therefore 558. Outcome measures: Parameters such as gender, age, level and side of discectomy were entered into a database for analysis. Diagnostic and clinical parameters were also entered; these included the value of the angle of the straight leg raise recorded and absence or presence of neurological deficit (altered sensation, reduced motor power, and absent or diminished reflexes). Operative findings recorded and entered were the type of disc at operation (i. e. protrusion, extrusion and sequestration) and the presence of free cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), however minor, indicating a dural tear. Results: The total number of primary discectomies was 558 of which 43 went on to require a second operation, giving a revision rate of 7.71%. Of the primary discectomies, 356 were protrusions, 92 extrusions and 110 sequestration. Of the 43 that went onto revision surgery, 35 were protrusions, two extrusion and six sequestration. A significant association was found with primary disc protrusions, this type of disc prolapse was almost three times more likely to go on to need revision surgery compared to extruded or sequestrated discs. Data analysed on primary protrusions showed these patients had a significantly greater straight leg raise angle and reduced incidence of positive neurological findings and so could be identified clinically. Conclusions: This lead us to conclude that the group of patients with primary protrusions could be selected out and treated conservatively since they are three times more likely to require revision surgery

Introduction Minimally invasive lumbar discectomy using the METRx™ System (MAST discectomy) has been advocated as an alternative to open microdiscectomy for symptomatic posterolateral lumbar disc herniation. This paper presents a quality assurance dual surgeon retrospective study with independent observer minimum twelve month follow-up. Methods This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Princess Alexandra Hospital prior to commencement. All patients who underwent MAST discectomy using the METRx™ System for the management of radiculopathy caused by posterolateral lumbar disc herniation under the care of two surgeons (AN and RK) more than twelve months prior to the commencement of assessment were included in the study. The patient demographic data was collected contemporaneously, operation performance data was collected retrospectively from hospital databases and outcome data was collected by telephone interview by independent observers (PL, SO and JP) a minimum of twelve months after discharge from hospital. Results 101 patients (53 males, 48 females) (average age 43 years, range 17 to 83 years) underwent 102 procedures between July 2001 and December 2004. Surgery was performed on the right side in 63 cases and was either at L4/5 (30%) or more commonly L5/S1 (70%). 21 were public patients and 80 private patients with 59 episodes of surgery occurring in a public hospital. 46 operations were performed with the METRx™ MED System and 56 with the METRx™ MD System. The average duration of surgery for patients at the Princess Alexandra Hospital (n = 48) was 88 minutes with an average length of post-operative hospital stay of 22 hrs 35 mins. 16 of these cases were performed as day surgery. Perioperative complications were: conversion to open (3), urine retention (7), nausea and vomiting (3), durotomy (5), wound haematoma not requiring surgery (1) and incorrect level surgery identified and rectified during surgery (1). The average length of time from surgery to independent follow-up was 679 days (range: 382 to 1055) with 78% successful contact. On the Modified McNabb Outcome Scale, 83% reported an excellent or good outcome, 9% reported a fair outcome and 8% a poor outcome. The time until return to work was identified as less than two weeks in 28% and between 2 weeks and 3 months in 39%. Patients whose surgery was funded by Workers Compensation were over-represented in both the poor outcomes and delayed return to work. 4 patients reported progressive severe low back pain, 10 patients reported ongoing lower limb pain (severe in 1 and mild in 9) and 1 patient underwent surgery for a recurrent disc prolapse. Further disc prolapse at different sites was identified in five patients. Discussion The retrospective data in this study forms class IV evidence for efficacy. As a quality assurance exercise it suggests an acceptable level of safety and efficacy to allow further technique development and study. A prospective randomized controlled study is proposed. The high incidence of urine retention early in the series of one surgeon is considered to be related to the practice of placing depot morphine in the operative bed. The reduction in complications in general and the improvement in duration of surgery over the series is evidence of the learning curve for this procedure

Purpose: The advent of lapaoscopic disectomy has made it possible to cure discal herniation with minimal trauma and no limitations on indications. We have adopted the technique described by J. Destandau since June 1998. The purpose of this work was to report our early results. Material and methods: Forty patients were included in a period from June 1998 to August 2000. There were 24 men and 16 women, mean age 43 years (24–78). Eleven patients had an associated stenosis of the spinal canal. Accelerated rehabilitation was employed. Sitting and driving were allowed early. Results: Mean follow-up was 13 months (2–27 months). Mean operative time was 63 minutes (30–150 min). Mean hospital stay was 3.92 days (2–10). There were 29 patients without stenosis of the lumbar canal. In this subgroup, outcome was excellent in 69%, good in 21% (six patients), fair in 3% (one patient), and poor in 7% (two patients). For the PROLO score, three patients were who were retreated were not included in the analysis. Outcome was excellent in 73% (19 patients), good in 12% (three patients), fair in 12% (three patients, and poor in 4% (one patient). In patients with lumbar canal stenosis, (eleven patients), three were reoperated for wider decompression; there was no haematoma. One patient was reoperated for deep infection. For the other patients the WADDELL score was excellent in five and good; in two the PROLO score was excellent in six and poor in one. Discussion: The technique favoured a narrow approach. Shorter exposure preserved the anatomy, but for the three patients with an associated stenosis, reoperation was necessary for decompression. For the cases without complications, we noticed that recovery was very rapid, a finding which is exceptional with the conventional technique. Conclusion: Our early experience with this technique has demonstrated that laparoscopic discectomy is feasible and safe. An associated stenosis is a limitation; we recommend systematic decompression in association with the discectomy

Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and inter-body fusion (ACDF) is recognised as an effective surgical treatment for cervical degenerative disc disease. The goals of anterior discectomy, interbody graft placement, and subsequent fusion, are to improve and maintain intervertebral height, establish and maintain physiological cervical lordosis, and achieve arthrodesis so as to eliminate pathological motion. Establishing the most clinically effective and cost effective operative approach to achieve these goals while, at the same time, minimising post-operative complications, is currently an evolving process. One view is that the use of anterior cervical plates reduces graft-related complications, maintains the cervical alignment, and leads to a higher incidence of fusion. In addition, there is evidence to suggest that there is a direct cost benefit of earlier return to pre-operative function and employment. Bone graft: Iliac crest autograft would be regarded as the gold standard source of bone for ACDF. However, donor site complications (due to harvesting autograft) are not insignificant and range from 1% to a sizeable 29%. These complications include iliac crest fracture, infection, persisting pain, neural injury, bowel injury, etc. With the advent of bone banks, allograft has become available and eliminates the problem of graft-harvest related complications. There is a theoretical risk of disease transmission and a corresponding difficulty with patients accepting donated tissue. To date, no HIV cases transmission has occurred from ACDF allograft. There are several studies that demonstrate a significant difference in fusion rates when comparing allograft and autograft. The preponderance of data from the literature supports the conclusion that the use of allograft in ACDF can lead to a higher incidence of graft collapse, pseudarthrosis, and possible subsequent revision surgery. Bishop et al., (Spine 1991 16:726–9): have documented a higher increase in pseudarthrosis rate, graft collapse, and interspace angulation in the allograft group compared to the autograft group. Therefore, the dilemma of allograft being preferred as a basis of eliminating graft harvesting complications, while at the same time being associated with a higher incidence of fusion failure and deformity, have led some surgeons to trial the combination of allograft with anterior plate fixation. Shapiro (J Neurosurg 1966 84:161–5) has reported no incidences of fusion failure, graft collapse, progressive kyphosis, or plate-related complications in 82 consecutive single and multiple level ACDF’s using allograft and anterior plating. Treatment failure: The incidence of the following complications have been reported in the literature. (Graham JJ. Spine 1989 14:1046–50). Pseudarthrosis – 3%–36%. Graft collapse – 3%–14%. Graft extrusion – 0.5%–4%. These figures are regardless of the graft source and are significant. Recent studies show that the combination of graft and anterior plate fixation virtually eliminates the complication of graft extrusion, and also decreases the risk of graft collapse and development of pseudarthrosis. There are also studies that contend that plate fixation can maintain proper lordotic alignment of the spine more effectively than can ACDF without plating. I contend that the use of contemporary cervical plates significantly decreases the rate of fusion failure and graft-related complications without imparting significant implant-related complications. As a result, there is decreased overall risk to the patient. The current type of plates which are available are unicortical with locking systems that substantially decrease the risk of screw loosening or hardware migration

Design of study: Prospective, observational. Purpose of the study: Obese and morbidly obese patients undergoing lumbar surgery can be a challenge to the operating surgeon. Reports on the perioperative data in this group of patients are scarce. The purpose of the study is to prospectively compare the perioperative data in patients with normal and high BMI, undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Method: We conducted a prospective audit of 50 consecutive patients who underwent primary discectomy or single level decompression under the care of single spine surgeon. Initial Low Back Outcome Score, length of incision, distance from skin to spinous process, distance from skin to lamina, length of hospital stay, blood loss and complications were studied in detail. Results: We used student t test to compare the two groups and Pearson Correlation to correlate the data against high BMI. We were unable to demonstrate a statistically significant difference between those with normal BMI and high BMI in any of the above parameters analysed. Conclusion: A high BMI was not associated with an increased perioperative morbidity in this patient group. Contrary to other areas of orthopaedic surgery, there is no statistically significant difference in the Initial Low Back Outcome Score and perioperative data between patients with normal and high BMI undergoing lumbar discectomy and single level decompression. Conflict of Interest: None. Source of Funding: None

Introduction Far lateral disc prolapse (also known as foraminal or extreme lateral prolapse) make up 10% of all disc herniations. In addition, far lateral disc prolapses tend to affect more proximal levels more frequently than do prolapses in the posterolateral location and they are often associated with greater radicular symptoms than typical posterolateral herniations, most likely due to involvement of the dorsal root ganglion. Surgery for far lateral disc protrusions has been associated with a less favourable outcome, perhaps due to delays in diagnosis, inadequate preoperative imaging, and postoperative instability as a result of excessive bony and facet resection during the surgical approach. Methods Twelve patients with far lateral disc herniations operated on by the senior author (RPW) fulfilled the criteria of having both pre- and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores recorded at each clinic visit. Results of these cases and those of a cohort of age and sex matched patients undergoing standard posterolateral discectomy undertaken by the same surgeon were analyzed. The presence of radiculopathy pre- and postoperatively, workers compensation status, return to work, length of stay and complications, as well as any prior intervention in the form of nerve root sleeve blocks or surgery were recorded. Results Both groups were well matched in terms of age and sex. Follow up ranged from 4 to 18 months. Herniations at more proximal levels (L2/3 and L3/4) were seen more frequently in the far lateral group than in the posterolateral group. Six patients in the far lateral group had preoperative nerve root sleeve blocks compared with one in the posterolateral group. Two patients in each group had had previous (different level) surgery. Patients in each group had similar preoperative ODI scores. Both groups demonstrated a reduction in the preoperative ODI compared with the preoperative score. The mean improvement was 24 (range −26 to +62) for the far lateral group and 22 (range −6 to +46). There was no significant difference between the groups. Discussion The results of this study are encouraging with respect to surgical treatment of far lateral discs. Recent literature has questioned the efficacy of surgical intervention for this pathology. These results show that with carefully selected patients results are comparable with standard posterolateral discectomy

We present a review of 553 patients who underwent surgery for intractable sciatica ascribed to prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. One surgeon in one institution undertook or supervised all the operations over a period of 16 years. The total number of primary discectomies included in the study was 531, of which 42 subsequently required a second operation for recurrent sciatica, giving a revision rate of 7.9%. Factors associated with reoperation were analysed. A contained disc protrusion was almost three times more likely to need revision surgery, compared with extruded or sequestrated discs. Patients with primary protrusions had a significantly greater straight-leg raise and reduced incidence of positive neurological findings compared with those with extruded or sequestrated discs. These patients should therefore be selected out clinically and treated by a more enthusiastic conservative programme, since they are three times more likely to require revision surgery

Lumbar disc herniations are quite common pathology in orthopedics. Percutaneous discectomy remains somewhat controvercial. It has limited indications and has not proven to be as effective as conventional or microscopic discectomy. Smith and Foley developed a new minimum invasive procedure for lumbar disc disease, Microendoscopic Discectomy (MED) in 1995. We started MED from October 1998. Besides, we started the clinical application of MED for lumbar spinal canal stenosis from February 2000. The purpose of the presentations are to present operative technique, early clinical results and complications. A) We operated upon 40 patients of MED from October 1998 to July 2000 for lumbar disc herniations. Male were 25, female were 15, and mean age was 38 years (15~64). In one patient, operated disc level was L2/3, in 21, L4/5, in 16, L5/S, and in two L4/5/S. Methods: We investigated: period of hospital stay, period of hospital stay postoperation, period to return to normal temperature, frequency of postop. NSAID, operation time, blood loss, period to begin to walk, JOA score, period to return to work or school, and complications. Results: The mean hospital stay was 17.9 days, the mean hospital stay postop. 9.7 days, period to return to normal temperature 1.3 days, frequency of postop. NSAID 1.1 times. The mean operation time was 105 ± 42 minutes, (65–180 min). The mean blood loss was 9.7 ± 18.5 Gm. (uncountable~ 120Gm.). All patients began to walk one day postoperatively. Mean JOA score was improved from 10.7 ± 3.8 preop. to 27.6 ± 0.9 4w. postop, to 28.1 ± 0.7 12w. postop., to 28.7 ± 0.6, 24w. postop. The mean period to return to work or school was 22.3 days. In one case, we had liquorrhea, and the damaged dura had to be repaired. B)We operated upon five patients of decompression by MED for lumbar spinal canal stenosis from February 2000 to July 2000. Male were one, female were four, and mean age was 72 years (65–77). In four patient, operated disc level was L4/5, in one, L5/S. We will show the operative procedures by videotape. We investigated – operation time, blood loss, period to begin to walk, JOA score, and complications. Results: The mean operation time was 128+−31 minutes, (85m–170m.). The mean blood loss was 25 ± 29 Gm. (uncountable – 70Gm.). All patients began to walk one day postoperatively. Mean JOA score was improved from 15.7 ± 3.3preop. to 27.5 ± 0.5 4w. postop, to 28.0 ± 0.7 12w. postop.. There was no complication. Discussion: The advantages of MED are small skin incision, less invasion to paravertebral muscles, short bed rest, and rapid return to work. The disadvantages are loss of deep perception and technical demands. To overcome the disadvantages, we are developping the 3D MED, and we are organizing live pig seminar biannually. Conclusion: MED has several advantages i,e, small skin incision, less invasion to paravertebral muscles, short bed rest, and rapid return to work. We need proper knowledge and technique about endoscopic surgery, and laboratory training by live pig and cadaver. MED can be applied to the decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis

Objective: Anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) has been established for 40 years. Most surgeons introduce an interbody spacer despite randomised evidence, which suggests this is unnecessary. Surgeons are concerned about the effects of discectomy on cervical spine alignment causing neck pain and accelerated degenerative changes at adjacent levels. In this study we have investigated the relationships between pre-operative disc height, post-operative radiological changes and clinical outcome following ACD. Design: Prospective cohort study of patients undergoing ACD. Subjects: Seventy-three patients undergoing ACD for the treatment of cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy. Minimum follow up one year. Outcome measures: SF 36, Neck Disability Index, visual analogue scores for neck and arm pain, cervical spine alignment, segmental kyphosis, and disc height. Results: Greater pre-op disc height predicts greater post op percentage loss of disc height but does not correlate with poor outcome (p> 0.05 all measures). Post- op X-rays revealed disturbed alignment in 54% of patients. Analysis of clinical outcome showed no statistical differences in any of the clinical outcome measures between patients with and without radiological abnormalities (p> 0.05) SF 36 scores were significantly worse than population controls in patients with and without radiological abnormalities. Conclusions: Large discs collapse more than small discs but this does not compromise outcome. Radiological changes occurred in a significant number of patients in this cohort. These abnormalities do not appear to influence clinical outcome at 12–24 months. The study continues and will report outcomes at five years

We treated 137 patients with symptomatic lumbar disc prolapse by automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy (APLD). Seventeen (12%) required further operation. At a mean follow-up of 55 months, the success rate was 45%. Of those who had APLD alone, 52% were graded as either excellent or good. In this group, 76% were employed, and the mean Oswestry score was 28.2%. One-third of those patients initially rated as successful had deterioration in symptoms and increased disability from back pain. The Short Form 36 health survey questionnaire revealed that these patients had a chronic ill-health profile

Microdiscectomy is the most commonly performed spine surgery in the world. Due to its technical simplicity and low complication rate, this was the first spine surgical procedure transitioning for one-day surgery. However, the economic assessment of this outpatient transition was never performed and the question on the real impact in the burden of spine care remains.

This economic study aims to access the cost-utility of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy when compared with the inpatient procedure.

To do so, a cost-utility study was performed, adopting the hospital perspective. Direct medical costs were retrieved from the assessment of 20 patients undergoing outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy and 20 undergoing inpatient lumbar microdiscectomy, from a in a Portuguese NHS hospital. Utilities were calculated with quality-adjusted life-years were derived from Oswestry Disability Index values (ODI). ODI was assessed prospectively in outpatients in pre and 3- and 6-month post-operative evaluations. Inpatient ODI data were estimated from a meta-analysis. both probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculated. A willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of €60000/QALY gained with inpatient procedure was defined.

Out results showed that inpatient procedure was cost-saving in all models tested. At 3-month assessment ICER ranged from €135753 to €345755/QALY, higher than the predefined WTP. At 6-month costs were lower and utilities were higher in outpatient, overpowering the inpatient procedure. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that in 65% to 73% of simulations outpatient was the better option. The savings with outpatient were about 55% of inpatient values, with similar utility scores. No 30-day readmissions were recorded in either group. The mean admission time in inpatient group was 2.5 days. Since there is an overall agreement among spine surgeons that an uncomplicated inpatient MD would only need a one-day admission, an analysis reducing inpatient admission time for one day was also performed and outpatient remained cost-effective.

In conclusion, as the first economic study on cost-utility of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy, this study showed a significant reduction in costs, with a similar clinical outcome, proving this outpatient transition as cost-effective

It is recognised that those patients who present sciatica and significant preceding back pain will be disappointed, following discectomy, with the relief of the sciatica alone, as considerable degenerate disc will remain. Though a bilateral fenestration exposure as much disc possible was removed right down to the back of the anterior longitudinal ligament. Intervertebral fusion was not used. Of 25 patients, with a mean follow up of 20 months, 59% reported a significant improvement in pain (p< 0. 05) and function (p< 0. 05) following surgery. Post-operative radiography did not reveal malalignment or instability. Prolo D et al. Toward uniformity results of lumbar spine operation. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions. . Spine. , . 1986. : . 11. :. 601. –6

Background. Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) has achieved favorable effects in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH), as a new surgical procedure. With its wide range of applications, a series of complications related to the operation has gradually emerged. Objective. To describe the type, incidence and characteristics of the complications following PEID and to explore preventative and treatment measures. Study Design. Retrospective, observational study. Setting. A spine center affiliated with a large general hospital. Method. In total, 479 cases of patients with LDH received PEID, which was performed by an experienced spine surgeon between January 2010 and April 2013. Data concerning the complications were recorded. Result. All of the 479 cases successfully received the procedure. A total of 482 procedures were completed. The mean follow-up time was 44.3 months, ranging from 24 to 60 months. The average patient age was 47.8 years, ranging from 16 to 76 years. There were 29 (6.0%) related complications that emerged, including 3 cases (0.6%) of fragment omission, and the symptoms gradually eased following 3–6 weeks of conservative treatment; 2 cases (0.4%) of nerve root injury, and the patients recovered well following 1–3 months of taking neurotrophic drugs and functional exercise; 15 cases (3.1%) of paresthesia, and this condition gradually improved following 3–6 weeks of rehabilitation exercises and treatment with mecobalamin and pregabalin; and recurrence occurred in 9 cases (1.9%), and the condition was controlled in 4 of these cases by using a conservative method, while 5 of the cases underwent reoperation, including 3 traditional open surgeries and 2 PEID. Furthermore, the complication rate for the first 100 cases was 16%. This rate decreased to 3.4% (for cases 101–479), and the incidence of L4–5 (8.2%) was significantly higher than L5-S1 (4.5%). Limitations. This is a retrospective study, and some bias exists due to the single-center study design. Conclusion. PEID is a surgical approach, which has a low complication rate. Fragment omission, nerve root injury, paresthesia and recurrence are relatively common. Some effective measures can prevent and reduce the incidence of the complications, such as strict indications for surgery, a thorough action plan and skilled operation skills

Introduction Lumbar discectomy is now the operation of choice for lumbosacral radicular syndrome. Few studies of high quality have been performed on the post-surgical management of these cases (Ostelo RWJG, et al; Spine 2003). The studies that have been reported compared one exercise regime to another. This study compares an exercise group with a true control group involving no exercise or formal rehabilitation. This is a randomised controlled trial comparing post surgical lumbar discectomy management regimes. Methods Ninety-three lumbar discectomy patients were randomised to two groups. Group A; the control group followed usual surgical advice which was to resume normal activity as soon as pain allowed. Group B; undertook a six month supervised non- aggravating gym rehab programme. Both groups were followed for a one year period using validated outcome measures and questionnaires (Roland Morris, Oswestry Low-back Score). The results are based on an intention-to-treat analysis. Results Patients in both groups improved during the one-year follow-up period (P=0.001). However there was no statistical difference between groups at the clinical end point (Roland Morris P=0.83, Oswestry Low-back Index P=0.90). Group B patients returned to work seven days earlier than group A patients and had fewer days off work in the one year follow-up period but this difference was not statistically significant. Discussion There was no statistical advantage gained by the patients who performed the gym rehabilitation programme after one year follow-up. These are the preliminary one-year results of a three-year follow-up study

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine how the short- and medium- to long-term outcome measures after total disc replacement (TDR) compare with those of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), using a systematic review and meta-analysis.

We used gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed MRI to investigate 67 patients with persistent pain after lumbar discectomy. Twenty-five patients had reoperations for lesions diagnosed in this way. Eleven were for recurrent disc prolapse at the same level and sciatica was relieved by all but one. Five operations were for prolapse at an adjacent level and all were successful. The diagnosis of sepsis was less precise, but extension of tissue enhancement into the operated disc space was found to be significant. Only three patients had evidence of arachnoiditis which suggests that this condition has been too often diagnosed as a cause of persisting low back pain

Lumbar discectomy is now the operation of choice for lumbosacral radicular syndrome. Few studies of high quality have been performed on the post surgical management of these cases. The studies that have been reported compared one exercise regime to another. This study compares an exercise group with a true control group involving no exercise or formal rehabilitation. This is a randomized controlled trial comparing post surgical lumbar discectomy management regimes. Ninety three lumbar discectomy patients were randomized to two groups. Group A; the control group followed usual surgical advice which was to resume normal activity as soon as pain allowed. Group B; undertook a six month supervised non aggravating gym rehab programme. Both groups were followed for a one year period using validated outcome measures and a questionnaire. The results are based on an intention-to-treat analysis. Patients in both groups improved during the one year follow up period (P=0.001). However there was no statistical difference between groups at the clinical end point (Roland Morris P=0.83, Oswestry Low back index P=0.90). Group B patients returned to work seven days earlier than group A patients and had fewer days off work in the one year follow up period but this difference was not statistically significant. There was no statistical advantage gained by the patients who performed the gym rehabilitation programme after one year follow up. These are the preliminary one year results of a three year follow up study

Background: To assess the clinical and radiological results of motion-segment sparing anterior cervical partial discectomy and foraminotomy surgery in patients with at least 1 year of follow-up. Methods: The study is a prospective, non-randomized, observational study. The patients all had symptoms of intrusive nerve root irritation with or without motor symptoms, refractory to conservative management for greater than 6 weeks duration. Patients were asked to complete questionnaires capturing) VAS (visual analogue) pain scores, NDI (neck disability index) and European myelopathy scores, patient satisfaction, and return to work details. Radiographic assessments were collected preoperatively, at 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Results: 58 patients have been assessed with at least 1year follow-up. The mean duration of symptoms prior to surgery was 24 weeks (6–20 weeks). 55 patients had single level surgeries (C5/C6-15, C6/C7-38, C7-T1-2), 3 patients had two level surgeries (C4/C5& C5/C6-1, C5/C6& C6/C7-2). In 34 patients sugery was for soft disc prolapse, in 12 patients surgery was for hard osteophytes and in 12 patients both pathologies contributed equally. Operation time ranged from 50–85 minutes. Average in patient stay was 2.6 days. There were no complications apart from 1 patient who had to return early to theatre for evacuation of haematoma and then made a full recovery. All patients reported pain intensity reductions. Pain decreased from 6.7 to 1.4 for arm pain on a 10-point scale. NDI scores improved from a preop mean of 42 to 16 on a 100 point score at 6 months post-surgery. All patients returned to their usual occupations with the exception of 2 patients who are involved in litigation against an employer or third party. No patient required repeat surgeries. Radiographic analysis at 1 year shows preservation of segmental motion in 75% patients, preservation of interbody height in 60% patients, spontaneous fusion in 12% patients. Conclusion: A clinical success rate of 90% was achieved (clinical success being defined as a patient rating of very satisfied or satisfied on a 5-point patient self-scoring outcome scale). 56 out of 58 patients would undergo the same procedure again and recommend it to friend

Aim: Evaluate the preoperative prognostic factors of a poor result in conventional surgery of lumbar disc herniation. Methods: From November 1995 to November 2001, we performed 113 standard discectomies (63 males/50 females) with a mean-age of 42 years (21–75). All patients had been evaluated preoperatively with X-ray and C.T. scan. Fifty-nine patients (52%) had a preoperative M.R.I., and an evaluation was made of disk degeneration degree, multilevel degeneration and bone changes in vertebral end-plates (according Modic classiþcation). The postoperative mean follow-up was 46,2 months. The outcomes were evaluated considering the reoperation rate, the intensity of pain in the Visual Analogue Score, and þnal function with the Oswestry Disability Index. The results were compared using ANOVA. Results: We have found a statistical correlation between a poor result and older age (p=0.006), diabetes (p=0.005), psychological factors (p=0.006) and preoperative X-ray changes, such as disk height loss greater than a third (p< 0.001), subcondral sclerosis (p< 0.001), segmental instability (p=0.019) and ostheo-arthritis (p< 0.001). Regarding M.R.I., the multilevel degeneration and the Modic changes (type I, II or III) have been correlated in this study with poor functional result (p=0.004 and p< 0.001 respectively). Conclusions: Our results support the concept that in patients with lumbar disk herniation and with described X-ray or M.R.I. changes, especially changes in vertebral end-plate, we should strongly consider treatment for disk degeneration and not limit the intervention to the excision of disk extrusion