The documentation of deep infection rates in joint replacement is fraught with multiple difficulties. Deep infections acquired in theatre may present late, but some later presenting deep infections are clearly haematogenous, and not related to surgical management. The effect of Ultra Clean Air on infection rates was published by Charnley in 1972 (CORR,87:167–187). The data is valuable because large numbers of THRs were performed in standard and Ultra Clean theatres, and detailed microbiology of the air was also recorded. No IV antibiotics were used, so only the effect of air quality was studied. We extracted the data on theatre type and numbers from Table 3, and numbers and intervals from surgery of deep infections from Table 7. Theatre types with 300 air changes per hour and 3.5 CFU/M. 3. were classified as Ultra Clean. A logistic regression model was used to examine the effect of theatre type and time elapsed after procedure on the probability of becoming infected. The model suggests that, controlling for time period, Ultra Clean Air is associated with a significantly lower probability of infection, with an OR of 0.30, p = 2.74 × 10. −6. The effect is larger earlier post-surgery, but it does persist. The results are best reviewed as a graphic, which shows that Ultra Clean Air clearly affects the deep infection rate for up to four years post-surgery. Ultra Clean Air reduces infection rates for up to four years post-surgery, so it is safe to assume that infections presenting after this are haematogenous. Ultra Clean Air does not eliminate early deep infection, so some early infections are not related to air quality. It is not practical to undertake widespread detailed retrospective analyses of cases. When monitoring infection rates there needs to be a balance between failing to record infections related to surgical technique and waiting many years to record low numbers of very late presenting problems. We suggest that registries should regard infections documented within three years of surgery as treatment complications. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Superficial pin site infection is a common problem associated with external fixation, which has been extensively reported. However, the incidence and risk factors with regards to deep infection is rarely reported in the literature. In this study, we investigate and explore the incidence and risk factors of deep infection following circular frame surgery. For the purpose of this study, deep infection was defined as: persistent discharge or collection for which surgical intervention was recommended. Materials and Methods. Retrospective review of all patients whom underwent frame surgery between 1. st. of April 2015 to 1. st. April 2019 in our unit with a minimum of 1 year follow up following frame removal. We recorded patient demographics, patient risk factors, trauma or elective procedure, number of days the frame was in situ, location of infection and fracture pattern. Results. 304 patients were identified. 27 patients were excluded as they were lost to follow up or had their primary frame surgery as a treatment for infection. This provided us with 277 patients for analysis. Mean age was 47 years (range 9–89 years), the male to female ratio was 1.5:1 and 80% were trauma frames. 13 patients (4.69%) developed deep infection and all occurred in trauma patients. Of the 13 patients who developed deep infection, 4 had infection before frame removal and 9 occurred after frame removal. 8 deep infections occurred within a year of frame removal, 1 occurred between 1 and 2 years. Within the 13 frame procedures for trauma, 12 were periarticular multifragmentary fractures, 3 of which were open, and the remaining was an open diaphyseal fracture. The periarticular fractures were more likely to develop deep infection than diaphyseal fractures (p–0.033). 12 patients (out of 13) also had concurrent minimally invasive internal fixation with screws in very close proximity of the wires. Conclusions. The rate of deep infection following circular frame surgery appears to be low. Pooled, multicentre data would be required to analyse risk factors however multifragmentary, periarticular fracture and the requirement for additional internal fixation appears to be an associated factor

Aims. Deep surgical site infection (SSI) remains an unsolved problem after hip fracture. Debridement, antibiotic, and implant retention (DAIR) has become a mainstream treatment in elective periprosthetic joint infection; however, evidence for DAIR after infected hip hemiarthroplaty is limited. Methods. Patients who underwent a hemiarthroplasty between March 2007 and August 2018 were reviewed. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify and adjust for risk factors for SSI, and to identify factors predicting a successful DAIR at one year. Results. A total of 3,966 patients were identified. The overall rate of SSI was 1.7% (51 patients (1.3%) with deep SSI, and 18 (0.45%) with superficial SSI). In all, 50 patients underwent revision surgery for infection (43 with DAIR, and seven with excision arthroplasty). After adjustment for other variables, only concurrent urinary tract infection (odds ratio (OR) 2.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57 to 4.92; p < 0.001) and increasing delay to theatre for treatment of the fracture (OR 1.31 per day, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.52; p < 0.001) were predictors of developing a SSI, while a cemented arthroplasty was protective (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.96; p = 0.031). In all, nine patients (20.9%) were alive at one year with a functioning hemiarthroplasty following DAIR, 20 (46.5%) required multiple surgical debridements after an initial DAIR, and 18 were converted to an excision arthroplasty due to persistent infection, with six were alive at one year. The culture of any gram-negative organism reduced success rates to 12.5% (no cases were successful with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas infection). Favourable organisms included Citrobacter and Proteus (100% cure rate). The all-cause mortality at one year after deep SSI was 55.87% versus 24.9% without deep infection. Conclusion. Deep infection remains a devastating complication regardless of the treatment strategy employed. Success rates of DAIR are poor compared to total hip arthroplasty, and should be reserved for favourable organisms in patients able to tolerate multiple surgical procedures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):958–965

Deep infection was identified as a serious complication in the earliest days of total hip arthroplasty. It was identified that airborne contamination in conventional operating theatres was the major contributing factor. As progress was made in improving the engineering of operating theatres, airborne contamination was reduced. Detailed studies were carried out relating airborne contamination to deep infection rates. In a trial conducted by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC), it was found that the use of ultra-clean air (UCA) operating theatres was associated with a significant reduction in deep infection rates. Deep infection rates were further reduced by the use of a body exhaust system. The MRC trial also included a detailed microbiology study, which confirmed the relationship between airborne contamination and deep infection rates. Recent observational evidence from joint registries has shown that in contemporary practice, infection rates remain a problem, and may be getting worse. Registry observations have also called into question the value of “laminar flow” operating theatres. Observational evidence from joint registries provides very limited evidence on the efficacy of UCA operating theatres. Although there have been some changes in surgical practice in recent years, the conclusions of the MRC trial remain valid, and the use of UCA is essential in preventing deep infection. There is evidence that if UCA operating theatres are not used correctly, they may have poor microbiological performance. Current UCA operating theatres have limitations, and further research is required to update them and improve their microbiological performance in contemporary practice. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1264–9

Aim. In recent years, many studies on revision for infection after arthroplasty have been published. In national arthroplasty registers, revision for infection is defined as surgical debridement, with or without removal or exchange of the entire or parts of the prosthesis due to deep infection, and should be reported to the register immediately after surgery. The diagnosis of infection is made at the surgeon's discretion, based on pre- and perioperative assessment and evaluation, and is not to be corrected to the register based on peroperative bacterial cultures. Due to this lack of validation, the rate of revision for infection will only be an approximation of the true rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Our aim was to validate the reporting of infection after total hip arthroplasty, and to assess if revisions for infection actually represented true PJI. Methods. We investigated the reported revisions for infection and aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty from 12 hospitals, representing one region of the country, reported during the period 2010–2020. The electronic patient charts were investigated for information on surgical treatment, use of antibiotics, biochemistry and microbiology findings. PJI was defined as growth of at least two phenotypically identical microbes in perioperative tissue samples. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated. Results. 145 revisions for infection and 137 revisions for aseptic loosening were reported. Of the reported infections, there were 141/145 true positives and 4/145 false positives. Of the reported aseptic loosenings, there were 126/137 true negatives and 11/137 false negatives. This gives a positive predictive value of 0.97, negative predictive value of 0.92, sensitivity of 0.93, specificity of 0.97 and accuracy of 0.95. Interpretation. We found the reporting revision for infection after total hip arthroplasty to the national register accurate. There was high correlation between reported revision for infection and PJI. Studies on revision for infection from arthroplasty registers may therefore be considered as reliable as studies of true PJI

Deep infection is one of the most serious complications after total hip replacement (THR). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of one stage revision THR for deep infection with a long-term follow-up. One stage revision THR for deep infection was carried out in 285 joints on 274 patients by a single surgeon (BMW) between 1974 and 2001. All infected hip replacements are primarily treated with one stage revision THR at the authors’ unit unless bone stock is extremely poor. This study included a review of 162 revisions in 154 for which a minimum follow-up of five years had been done. The mean duration of follow-up was 12.3 years. Trochanteric osteotomy was done for extensive resection of infected tissue and removal of cement. Both cups and stems were revised with bone cement. Antibiotic-loaded cement was used in 152 cases (93.8%). Further antibiotics were commenced systemically for 6–12 weeks postoperatively. Failure of infection control was defined as a) reoperation for recurrent infection or b) clinically persistent infection. Infection control. One hundred and thirty eight hips (85.2%) were free of infection at the time of the latest follow-up. 1) No sinus group (N=110): Success rate was 82.7 %. 2) Sinus group (N=52): Success rate was 90.4 %. This study presents the longest follow-up with a large number of cases in revision THR for deep infection. At least, history of discharging sinus was not considered as a contraindication. The results suggested that one stage revision was an effective treatment for deep infection of hip replacement in the long term

Purpose: Currently, there is little information available concerning the outcome of patients with infection following rotator cuff repair. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to review the incidence, management and outcomes of patients with rotator cuff repair complicated with deep infection. Methods: Between 1975 and 2003, 39 cases of deep infection following rotator cuff repair were identified. The medical records and radiographs were retrospectively examined. At a mean follow-up of 8.2 years, seven patients had died and two patients had been lost to follow-up leaving 30 cases for outcome evaluation. Results: The incidence of deep infection after rotator cuff repairs that were performed at our institution was 0.43% (21 of 4886 cases). The mean interval from rotator cuff repair to the time of infection diagnosis was 49 days. ESR and C-reactive protein were elevated in only 60% and 50% of patients, respectively. Propionibacterium was the most common organism isolated, infecting 51% of cases. A mean of 3.3 surgical debridements were necessary for the eradication of infection. At final follow-up, mean active abduction was 121° and mean external rotation was 44°. The ASES score averaged 67 points and the Simple Shoulder Test score averaged 7.3 points. Conclusions: The data from this study suggests that the eradication of deep infection following rotator cuff repair is possible, however, substantial functional limitations are not unusual. Additionally, the treating surgeon should be aware of the high incidence of Propionibacterium and the importance of allowing a minimum of seven days of culture to identify this organism

This study explores the relationship between delay to surgical debridement and deep infection in a series of 364 consecutive patients with 459 open fractures treated at an academic level one trauma hospital in North America. . The mean delay to debridement for all fractures was 10.6 hours (0.6 to 111.5). There were 46 deep infections (10%). There were no infections among the 55 Gustilo-Anderson grade I open fractures. Among the grade II and III injuries, a statistically significant increase in the rate of deep infection was found for each hour of delay (OR = 1.033: 95% CI 1.01 to 1.057). This relationship shows a linear increase of 3% per hour of delay. No distinct time cut-off points were identified. Deep infection was also associated with tibial fractures (OR = 2.44: 95% CI 1.26 to 4.73), a higher Gustilo-Anderson grade (OR = 1.99: 95% CI 1.004 to 3.954), and contamination of the fracture (OR = 3.12: 95% CI 1.36 to 7.36). These individual effects are additive, which suggests that delayed debridement will have a clinically significant detrimental effect on more severe open fractures. Delayed treatment appeared safe for grade 1 open fractures. However, when the negative prognostic factors of tibial site, high grade of fracture and/or contamination are present we recommend more urgent operative debridement. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:379–84

Sixty-eight patients suffering deep infection from a consecutive series of 1746 total hip replacement operations are reviewed. The infection rate has been reduced considerably by improved technique and multiple antibiotic prophylaxis without the use of a special operation enclosure. Factors affecting deep infection are analysed and discussed

Surgical site infections (SSIs) after spinal fusion surgery increase healthcare costs, morbidity and mortality. Routine measures of obesity fail to consider site specific fat distribution. We aimed to assess the association between the spine adipose index and deep surgical site infection and determine a threshold value for spine adipose index that can assist in preoperative risk stratification in patients undergoing posterior instrumented lumbar fusion (PILF). A multicentre retrospective case-control study was completed. We reviewed patients who underwent PILF from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018. All patients developing a deep primary incisional or organ-space SSI within 90 days of surgery as per US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention criteria were identified. We gathered potential pre-operative and intra-operative deep infection risk factors for each patient. Spine adipose index was measured on pre-operative mid-sagittal cuts of T2 weighted MRI scans. Each measurement was repeated twice by three authors in a blinded fashion, with each series of measurement separated by a period of at least six weeks. Forty-two patients were included in final analysis, with twenty-one cases and twenty-one matched controls. The spine adipose index was significantly greater in patients developing deep SSI (p =0.029), and this relationship was maintained after adjusting for confounders (p=0.046). Risk of developing deep SSI following PILF surgery was increased 2.0-fold when the spine adipose index was ≥0.51. The spine adipose index had excellent (ICC >0.9; p <0.001) inter- and intra-observer reliabilities. The spine adipose index is a novel radiographic measure and an independent risk factor for developing deep SSI, with 0.51 being the ideal threshold value for pre-operative risk stratification in patients undergoing PILF surgery

Introduction and Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of one stage revision THA for deep infection with a long-term follow-up. Method: One stage revision THA for deep infection was carried out in 273 joints on 262 patients by the senior author between 1974 and 2000. All infected hip replacements were primarily treated with one stage revision THA, regardless of microorganisms at the authors’ unit unless bone stock in the hips was too poor for implant fixation. This study included 162 revisions in 154 patients for which a minimum follow-up of five years (range 5.1 to 27.6 years; average 12.3 years) had been done. Fifty-two cases (32.1 %) had had discharging sinus by the time of revision surgery for infection. Results: One hundred and thirty eight (85.2 %) hips were free of infection at the time of the latest follow-up. Twenty cases (12.3 %) had reoperation for recurrent infection. Four hips (2.5%) maintained their implants with the evidence of infection. Twenty-two cases (13.6 %) showed radiological loosening. Thirteen cases (8.0 %) were revised again for reasons other than infection (12 for aseptic loosening and one for dislocation). Conclusion: Deep infection is one of the most serious complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study presented the longest follow-up, with a large number of cases in revision THA for deep infection. The results suggested that one stage revision was an effective treatment for deep infection of hip arthroplasty

Purpose: Prophylactic use of antibiotic-laden bone cement (ALBC) has been proposed to decrease the incidence of deep infections. We asked if the use of antibiotic laden bone cement decreased the deep infection rate following primary total knee replacement (TKA) as compared to plain bone cement (PBC). Method: We surveyed 1,625 consecutive patients undergoing cemented, primary knee replacement with either ALBC or PBC. Relevant covariates including age, body mass index (BMI), gender, education, and medical comorbidity were collected. Joint pain and functional status were assessed at baseline and at 1 year follow up with the respective Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores. The incidence of deep infection at 1 year follow up was recorded. Results: There were 811 (49.9%) patients in the ALBC group and 814(50.1%) in the PBC group. There were no differences in age, gender, BMI, education or comorbidity between groups at baseline (p> 0.05). We found a deep infection rate of 3.1% in the ALBC group and 2.2% in the PBC group (p=0.27). Adjusted analysis showed that ALBC was not predictive of a lower infection rate at 1 year (p=0.84). Conclusion: ALBC did not reduce the incidence of deep infection following primary TKA at 1 year follow up. Further studies are needed to define any high risk groups for which ALBC might be beneficial

Background and Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to assess the risk for revision due to deep infection for primary uncemented total hip arthroplasties (THAs) reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) over the period 1987–2007. Methods: All primary uncemented THAs reported to NAR from the period 1987–2007 were studied. Adjusted Cox regression analyses with first revision due to deep infection as the end-point were performed. Changes in the revision rate as a function of year of operation were investigated, as was impact of risk factors (gender, age, type of diagnosis, duration of surgery, operation room ventilation and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis) on risk for revision due to deep infection. Results: 14,348 primary uncemented THAs met the inclusion criteria. 97 THAs had been revised due to deep infection (5-year survival 99.56). Risk for revision due to deep infection increased through the period studied. Compared to the uncemented THAs implanted 1987–1992, the risk for revision due to infection was 1.2 times higher (95%CI 0.6–2.4, p=0.6) for those implanted 1993–1997, 1.4 times (95%CI 0.7–2.9, p=0.3) for 1998–2002, and 5.3 times (95%CI 2.6–10.7, p=< 0.001) for 2003–2007. The increase in risk for revision due to infection for primary uncemented THAs was most pronounced after the year 2000. No risk factor registered had any statistically significant impact on risk for revision due to infection in this study. Interpretation: The results of this study indicate an increase in incidence of deep infection after uncemented THAs during the period 1987–2007. Concomitant changes in confounding factors, however, complicate the interpretation of these results

Our aim was to review the efficacy of the wound vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system in the treatment of deep infection after extensive instrumentation and fusion for spinal deformity in children and adolescents. A total of 14 patients with early deep spinal infection were treated using this technique. Of these, 12 had neuromuscular or syndromic problems. Clinical and laboratory data were reviewed. The mean follow-up was 44 months (24 to 72). All wounds healed. Two patients required plastic surgery to speed up the process. In no patient was the hardware removed and there was no loss of correction or recurrent infection. We believe that the wound VAC system is a useful tool in the armamentarium of the spinal surgeon dealing with patients susceptible to wound infections, especially those with neuromuscular diseases. It allows for the retention of the instrumentation and the maintenance of spinal correction. It is reliable and easy to use

Over the period 1990–2002, 12 patients, 3 male and 9 female, mean age 65 years (58–74), have been treated for deep infection after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Two patients diagnosed with early and ten with late infection. Diagnosis was clinical, radiological (X-rays, 3 phase bone scan with Tc99m), laboratory (WBC, ESR, CRP) and from knee aspiration cultures. Of the inflammations, three were low grade. Eight patients had resurfacing total knee replacement, while four hinged type (Endomodel). Five of the initial arthroplasties were referred cases. Two phase revision was performed to all patients. Initially there was removal of the prothesis and extensive surgical debridement. Staphylococcus Aureus was cultured from seven arthroplasties, Staphylococcus Epidermidis from three and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa from two. After the prothesis removal, PMMA spacer with antibiotic was placed, in eleven cases molded to the shape of a TKA which permitted knee motion. A 6–8 week period of IV antibiotic therapy followed, which was based on intraoperative cultures and microbial sensitivity. Finally arthrodesis was performed in two knees, while in the other ten a new cemented TKA was place. All the patients received postsurgery antibiotics for 3–6 months. No recurrences of infection were note over a follow-up period of 8 months to 10 years, one revision was performed for a fractured femoral stem. In conclusion, two phase revision arthroplasty is proved to be an invaluable method in the treatment of deep infection after total knee arthroplasty

The objective of this study is to report the epidemiology and results of treatment of deep infection after a reverse shoulder arthroplasty. This is a multicenter retrospective study involving 457 reverse prostheses performed between 1992 and 2002. Fifteen patients (3%) (mean age 71 ± 9 years) presented with a deep infection. Eight were primary arthroplasties and seven were revision procedures. There were five associated peri-operative fractures and three early postoperative complications requiring surgical treatment. Infection was treated by debridement (n=4), prosthetic resection (n=10) or two-stage revision (n=1). The infection rate was 2% (8/363) for a primary reverse arthroplasty and 7% (7/94) for revisions. The infection was diagnosed at a mean of seventeen months (range, one to fifty-seven) post-operatively, corresponding to two acute, five sub-acute and eight chronic infections. The most common pathogen was P. acnes in six cases (40%). At a mean follow-up of thirty-four ± nineteen months, there were twelve remissions (80%) and three recurrent infections. The two acute infections (one debridement and one resection) and the eight chronic infections (seven resections and one two-stage revision) were in remission. Among the five sub-acute infections, the two resections were in remission, whereas the three debridements recurred. Overall, the ten resections were in remission with seven patients disappointed and three satisfied, a mean Constant score of thirty-one ± eight points and a mean active anterior elevation of 53 ± 15°. The two-stage exchange was in remission but remained disappointed with a Constant score of twenty-seven points and an active anterior elevation of 90°. Infection compromises the functional results of the reverse prosthesis whatever the treatment performed. Acute infections appear to be satisfactorily treated by debridement or resection. Both resection and two-stage revision can successfully treat sub-acute and chronic infection; however, debridement alone is ineffective and not recommended. There is a high rate of infection when the reverse prosthesis is used in revision arthroplasty. Prevention, by looking for such infection before surgery and by performing a two-stage procedure is recommended in the case of any uncertainty

We reviewed a series of 91 patients with deep infection of a cemented total hip arthroplasty caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci (C-NS). Of these, 72 were treated by one-stage exchange arthroplasty with a failure rate of 13% due to recurrence of infection. The other 19 patients have started or completed treatment by a two-stage exchange without failure to date. In 27 of the 91 patients multiple strains of C-NS were discovered, many being resistant to previously used antibiotics. The use of gentamicin-containing cement in the primary arthroplasty was significantly associated with the emergence of gentamicin-resistant C-NS in subsequent deep infection. Bacteriological diagnosis of such infections must take into consideration the possibility that multiple strains of the organism are involved

The aim of our study is to identify the organisms causing delayed deep infections following primary total knee arthroplasty in the current situation. We also compared the differences in outcome based on the infecting organism. We undertook a retrospective study of all the patients who presented with delayed deep infection following primary total knee replacement during a six year period between April 1998 and March 2004. We analysed the infecting organism, sensitivity of the organism to antibiotics, number of surgical procedure carried out and the outcome of the infected arthroplasty based on the infecting organism. Statistical analysis was done using Fisher’s Exact test for categorical data and Mann-Whitney U test for the non-parametric numeric data. The mean age at the time of primary arthroplasty was 69.9 years (range 46 to 92 years, SD=10.8). The mean follow-up (time since the initial knee replacement) was 77.3 months (range 27–170 months,). The mean follow-up since the last surgical procedure to treat infection was 31 months (range 14–47 months). Organisms were isolated in 27 of the 31 patients who presented with delayed deep infection. Forty-four % of the organisms isolated were multi-drug resistant with increasing incidence of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis infections. Successful outcome following an infected total knee arthroplasty was lower compared to the previous studies where there were fewer multi-drug resistant organisms. The number of patients with satisfactory outcome is significantly lower when the organism isolated is multi-drug resistant. Patients infected by multi-drug resistant organisms undergo higher number of surgical procedures compared to patients where the organism is not multi-drug resistant. We conclude that deep infection with MRSA and Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis are on the rise. Outcome is significantly better when the organism isolated is non resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Introduction: Bone stock and cement-bone interface in revision total hip replacement (THR) for deep infection have never been investigated in the literature, while they are known to be important for aseptic loosening. The purpose of this study was to assess preoperative bone stock and immediate postoperative cement-bone interface as factors affecting infection control and mechanical outcome after revision THR for deep infection. Methods: This study included 115 cases in which revision THR with antibiotic-loaded cement was operated for infected hip replacement by a single surgeon with minimal follow-up of five years (range 5–27 years). Preoperative bone stock was classified into four grades (Grade 0: No bone loss, Grade 1: Demarcation, Grade 2: Localized cavitation, Grade 3: Extensive bone loss). The immediate postoperative cement-bone interface was also graded into four categories (Grade A: White-out, obscure interface, Grade B: Clear line, no measurable gap, Grade C: Gap> 1mm, Grade D< 1mm). These two factors were analysed with regard to infection control and mechanical survival of implants after surgery. Results: Bone stock did not have significant influence on infection control while it affected mechanical outcome. The cement-bone interface was an affecting factor for not only the mechanical survival of implants but also the cure of infection. Discussion: There was a good chance of curing the infection even with extensive bone loss. Good cement fixation was an important factor with regard to infection control as well as the mechanical survival of implants. The results suggested that it might be important to shield the medullary space from the infected joint space with antibiotic-loaded cement

We explored the association of post-operative pyrexia following hip arthroplasty and the development of deep infection Method: The postoperative temperature records of 80 patient’s following primary hip replacement were retrospectively analysed. Thirty-one patients had revision surgery at a mean time interval of 37.2 months (range 5–74 months) for confirmed deep prosthetic infection. The control group of patients were asymptomatic at a mean follow-up of 31.5 months. There were 28 patients with an uneventful clinical outcome following surgery and 21 patients who had developed a systemic infection during their stay in hospital. The maximum daily temperature of each patient was recorded. Results: The mean peak temperature of patients with deep prosthetic infection was significantly lower then patients with a systemic infection or a normal clinical recovery following surgery (p=0.01). The difference between the peak post-operative temperature and the preoperative temperature was also significantly lower in patients who subsequently required revision surgery for prosthetic infection (p=0.007). Conclusion: Patients with deep prosthetic infection have a lower pyrexia response then patients with either an uneventful clinical recovery or the development of a systemic infection following total hip replacement. Pyrexia is part of the acute phase response following surgery is mediated by cytokines including IL-1 and IL-6, which are also involved in activation of the patients cellular and humoral immune response. A low pyrexia response following surgery may therefore also be suggestive of reduced acute phase response to the potential wound contamination produced during surgery with a consequence of subsequent prosthetic infection

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a laminar flow operating system reduces deep infection rates in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) and to examine the costs involved in implementing laminar flow technology. A retrospective analysis of deep infection rates in 759 patients who underwent THA and TKA was performed in one hospital prior to and after the introduction of a vertical laminar flow operating system together with the use of isolation body exhaust suits. A cost analysis was also performed on the cost of implementing laminar flow technology and the average inpatient hospital cost of managing a deep infection. A control group consisted of 387 THA and TKA performed in 2 years in a conventional operating theatre and follow up carried out to a mean of 29 months. There were 12 recorded deep infections, 3.1%. Case group consisted of 372 THA and TKA performed in 2 years after the introduction of a vertical laminar flow operating theatre together with the use of isolation body exhaust suits, with a mean follow up to 22 months. There were 4 recorded deep infections, 1.1%. A comparison of deep infection rates yielded p value 0.06. There was a strong trend toward a reduction in deep infection rate in THA and TKA performed in the laminar flow theatre with the use of isolation body exhaust suits. The economic impact of deep infection in THA and TKA is vast and the cost of implementing laminar flow technology must be weighed against the deep infection rate as well as the number of operations performed at an institution

Aim. This study aimed to identify risk factors for development of deep periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients following surgical treatment of neck of femur fracture. Method. This study identified a consecutive series of 2,822 (2,052 female, 73%) patients who underwent either hemiarthroplasty (n=1,825, 65%) or fixation (DHS) (n=997, 35%) for fractured neck of femur performed between January 2009 and June 2015 at our institution. Full patient demographics, co-morbidity and peri-operative complication data were determined. The majority of patients were either ASA 2 (n=663, 23%) or ASA 3 (n=1,521, 54%), mean age = 81.3 years (SD 10.3). All patients were followed up post-operatively by a dedicated surgical site infection (SSI) monitoring team in order to identify patients who developed a PJI within 1 year. A stepwise multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify patient and surgical factors associated with increased risk of infection. Predictors with a p-value of <0.20 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. Results. Thirty-nine (39) cases of deep periprosthetic infection were identified (hemiarthroplasty n=35, DHS n=4) representing an overall deep infection rate of 1.4% (hemiarthroplasty 1.9%, DHS 0.4%). The most common infecting pathogen was a pure growth of coagulase negative Staphylococcus (n=9, 23%) followed by a pure growth of Staphylococcus aureus (n=7, 18%). An increased risk of PJI was observed in patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty compared to those treated by fixation (odds ratio (OR) 6.50, 95%CI 2.26 – 18.7, p=0.001). Of patient factors, only blood transfusion within 30 days (OR 3.51, 95%CI 1.72 – 7.13, p=0.001) and the presence or development of pressure sores on or during admission (OR 2.99, 95%CI 1.24 – 7.19, p=0.015) were significantly associated with an increased risk of development of PJI. Use of high-dose dual antibiotic cement (gentamicin and clindamycin) was associated with a two-fold reduction in the risk of PJI (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.20 – 0.76, p=0.005) vs standard dose gentamicin antibiotic cement. Conclusions. This study found: 1) a deep infection rate similar to that reported earlier from large number studies from the UK, 2) a six-fold higher deep infection rate in hemiarthroplasties, compared to internal fixations, and 3) a three-fold higher infection rate in patients who suffer concomitant pressure sores or receive a blood transfusion up to 30 days post-operatively

Exchange operation is recommended as the treatment of choice for most deep infections involving a total hip replacement. This revision arthroplasty comprises, in one stage, excision of soft tissue, removal of implant and cement, replacement with an appropriate implant using Palacos R acrylic cement loaded with an appropriate antibiotic and, more recently, systemic antibiotics. During our first 10 years without systemic antibiotics we have achieved an overall 77 per cent success rate from a first attempt in 583 patients and a 90 per cent success rate after subsequent exchange procedures. Morbidity is significant but acceptable. Success is defined as control of infection, no loosening, and useful function. The factors associated with failures include, in particular, specific infections (Pseudomonas group, Streptococcus group D, Proteus group, and Escherichia coli), delay in operation and inadequate antibiotic dosage in the cement

Introduction and Aims: Endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) following Bone Tumor excision is common. A major complication is infection with serious consequences. The aim is to investigate the cause of infection, management and sequalae. Method: Over 11, 000 patients have been treated in our unit over 35 years. Information collected prospectively on a database, includes demographic data, diagnosis, treatment (including adjuvant), complications, and outcomes. Data was analysed to identify any infection in EPRs, its management and outcome. Factors such as operating time, blood loss, adjuvant therapy, type of prosthesis were investigated. Outcomes of treatment options were evaluated. Results: Data was analysed on 1265 patients undergoing EPR over 34 years. Giving a total follow-up time of over 6500 patient years. One hundred and thirty-seven (10.8%) patients had deep infection (defined by a positive culture [n=128] or a clinically infected prosthesis with pus in the EPR cavity [n=9]). Forty-nine (34%) required amputations for uncontrollable infection. The commonest organisms were Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus and Group D Streptococci. The only satisfactory limb salvaging operation was two-stage revision, with a 71% success in curing infection. Systemic antibiotics, antibiotic cement or beads and surgical debridement had little chance of curing infection. Infection rates were highest in tibial (23.1%) and pelvic (22.9%) EPRs (p< 0.0001). Patients who had pre- or post-operative radiotherapy had significantly higher rates of infection (p< 0.0001), as did patients with extendable EPRs (p=0.007). Patients who had subsequently undergone patella resurfacing and rebushing also had a higher rate of infection (p= 0.019 & p=0.052). Conclusion: Infection is a serious complication of EPRs. Treatment is difficult and prolonged. Two-stage revision is the only reliable method for limb salvage following deep infection. Prevention must be the key to reducing the incidence of this serious complication

Infection following total knee arthroplasty is a serious complication. Recently there has been increasing incidence of isolation of multi-drug resistant bacteria from peri-prosthetic infections. The aim of our study is to identify the organisms causing delayed deep infections following primary total knee arthroplasty in the current situation. We also compared the differences in outcome based on the infecting organism. We undertook a retrospective study of all the patients who presented with delayed deep infection following primary total knee replacement during a six year period between April 1998 and March 2004. Organisms were isolated in 27 of the 31 patients who presented with delayed deep infection. Forty-four % of the organisms isolated were multi-drug resistant with increasing incidence of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis infections. Successful outcome following an infected total knee arthroplasty was lower compared to the previous studies where there were fewer multi-drug resistant organisms. The average number of surgical procedures carried out was significantly higher when the organism isolated was multi-drug resistant. The number of patients with satisfactory outcome is significantly lower when the organism isolated is multi-drug resistant

Patients presenting with a fractured neck of femur are a fragile group with multiple co-morbidities who are at risk of post-operative complications. As many as 52% of patients are reported to suffer a urinary tract infection post hip fracture surgery. There are little data surrounding the effects of post-operative urinary tract infections on mortality and deep prosthetic infection. We prospectively investigated the impact of post-operative urinary tract infection (UTI) in 9168 patients admitted to our institution with a diagnosis of proximal femoral fracture over an eleven year period in a prospective population study. We examined the effects of post operative UTI on the incidence of deep infection, survivorship and length of stay. Post-operative UTI occurred in 6.1% (n=561) and deep infection in 0.89% (n=82). Deep infection was significantly more common in patients complicated with a UTI (3.2% vs 0.74% p< 0.001) with a relative risk of 3.7:1. In 58% of patients the same organisms was cultured in the urine and hip samples. A postoperative UTI did not adversely effect 90 day survival, however was associated with an increased length of stay (ROC analysis AUC=0.79). Delays to surgery and age were not predictive of a post operative UTI. Recognition of the risks posed by post operative UTI, the risk factors for development of infection and early treatment is essential to reduce the risks of increased subsequent periprosthetic infection

Background: Since Sir John Charnley introduced bio-clean air operating techniques such as the “body exhausting” system and a bio-clean air operating theatre to reduce the risk of infection3), total hip replacement has become one of the safest and most successful procedures in orthopaedic surgery and has benefited numerous people suffering from arthritis all over the world. However, deep infection is still undoubtedly one of the most serious complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is still controversial whether one or two stage revision should be indicated for deeply infected hip replacement. Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify the influential factors in one stage revision THA for deep infection with a long-term follow-up. Methods: One stage revision THA for deep infection was carried out in 273 joints on 262 patients by the senior author between 1974 and 2000. All infected hip replacements were primarily treated with one stage revision THA regardless of micro organisms at the authors’ unit as far as sufficient bone stock for socket fixation was available in the acetabulum. This study included 162 revisions in 154 patients for which a minimum follow-up of five years (range 5 to 28 years; average 12.3 years) had been done. Fifty-two cases (32.1 %) had had discharging sinus by the time of revision surgery for infection. Results: One hundred and thirty eight (85.2 %) hips were free of infection at the time of the latest follow-up. Twenty cases (12.3 %) had reoperation for recurrent infection. Four hips (2.5 %) maintained their implants with the evidence of infection. Twenty-two cases (13.6 %) showed radiological loosening. Thirteen cases (8.0 %) were revised again for reasons other than infection (12 for aseptic loosening and one for dislocation). Bone stock did not have significant influence on infection control while it did affect mechanical outcome. The cement-bone interface was an affecting factor for not only the mechanical survival of implants but also the cure of infection. Neither discharging sinus nor gram-negative microorganism was considered as a contraindication. Conclusion: This study presented the longest follow-up with a large number of cases in revision THA for deep infection. The results suggested that shielding medullary space with antibiotic-loaded cement was important for treatment of infected THA

Background: Since Sir John Charnley introduced bio-clean air operating techniques such as the “body exhausting” system and a bio-clean air operating theatre to reduce the risk of infection 3), total hip replacement has become one of the safest and most successful procedures in orthopaedic surgery and has benefited numerous people suffering from arthritis all over the world. However, deep infection is still undoubtedly one of the most serious complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is still controversial whether one or two stage revision should be indicated for deeply infected hip replacement. Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify the influential factors in one stage revision THA for deep infection with a long-term follow-up. Methods: One stage revision THA for deep infection was carried out in 273 joints on 262 patients by the senior author between 1974 and 2000. All infected hip replacements were primarily treated with one stage revision THA regardless of micro organisms at the authors’ unit as far as sufficient bone stock for socket fixation was available in the acetabulum. This study included 162 revisions in 154 patients for which a minimum follow-up of five years (range 5 to 28 years; average 12.3 years) had been done. Fifty-two cases (32.1 %) had had discharging sinus by the time of revision surgery for infection. Results: One hundred and thirty eight (85.2 %) hips were free of infection at the time of the latest follow-up. Twenty cases (12.3 %) had reoperation for recurrent infection. Four hips (2.5 %) maintained their implants with the evidence of infection. Twenty-two cases (13.6 %) showed radiological loosening. Thirteen cases (8.0 %) were revised again for reasons other than infection (12 for aseptic loosening and one for dislocation). Bone stock did not have significant influence on infection control while it did affect mechanical outcome. The cement-bone interface was an affecting factor for not only the mechanical survival of implants but also the cure of infection. Neither discharging sinus nor gram-negative microorganism was considered as a contraindication. Conclusion: This study presented the longest follow-up with a large number of cases in revision THA for deep infection. The results suggested that shielding medullary space with antibiotic-loaded cement was important for treatment of infected THA

Grade III Open fractures of the tibia represent a serious injury. It is recognised that combined management of these cases by experienced orthopaedic and plastic surgeons improves outcomes. Previous studies have not considered the timing of definitive soft tissue cover in relation to the definitive orthopaedic management. We reviewed medical notes of 73 patients with 74 Grade III Open tibia fractures (minimum 1 year follow up), to compare deep infection rates in patients who had a) a single-stage definitive fixation and soft tissue coverage vs. those who had separate operations, and b) those who had definitive treatment completed in < 72 hours vs. > 72 hours. Of subjects that underwent definitive fixation and coverage in a single procedure, 4.2% developed deep infections, compared with 34.6 % deep infection(p<0.001) in those who underwent definitive treatment at separate operations. Of patients who had definitive treatment completed in < 72-hours, 20.0% developed deep infections a compared with 12.2%(p=0.4919) in the >72-hour group. Patients with Gustilo III open tibial fractures have lower rates of deep infection if definitive fixation and coverage are performed in a single-stage procedure. Emphasis should be placed on timely transfer to a specialist centre, aiming for a single-stage combined orthoplastic surgery

A retrospective review of 1542 Charnley low-friction arthroplasties was carried out to compare the incidence of deep infection arising after plain and gentamicin-containing acrylic cement. There was no significant difference between the two series in primary operations, the infection rate being 1.72% and 1.65% respectively. However, in secondary operations (conversions and revisions) the gentamicin-containing cement gave significantly better results--a 0.81% infection rate as compared with 3.46%. All operations were performed in a clean air enclosure using total-body exhaust suits. Radiological diagnosis of deep infection was possible within one year of operation in all cases. Late haematogenous infection occurred in one case and was related to a skin lesion

Introduction. Preoperative bone stock and cement-bone interface in revision total hip replacement (THR) for deep infection have never been investigated while they are both well known to be important for mechanical outcome after revision THR for aseptic loosening. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to assess pre-operative bone stock and immediate postoperative cement-bone interface as factors affecting infection control after one stage revision THR for deep infection. Material and methods. This study included 115 cases which satisfied following conditions; a) One stage revision THRs for deep infection were carried out by a single surgeon. b) Follow-up of more than five years was done. Preoperative bone stock was classified into four grades (Grade 0: No bone loss, Grade 1: Demarcation, Grade 2: Localized cavitation, Grade 3: Extensive bone loss). Immediate postoperative cement-bone interface was also graded into four categories (Grade A: White-out, obscure interface, Grade B: Clear line, no measurable gap, Grade C: Gap within 1mm, Grade D: Gap more than 1mm). These two factors were analyzed in view of infection control after surgery. Results. Preoperative bone stock did not show significant influence on infection control. Immediate postoperative cement-bone interface was an affecting factor for cure of infection. Conclusion. There was a good chance of cure of infection even in cases with significant bone loss. Good cement fixation appeared to be important in view of infection control. The results suggested the importance of shielding of medullary space with antibiotic-loaded cement from infected joint space in revision THR for infection

Introduction: The principles of treatment of deep wound infection around bony implants involves appropriate antibiotics, drainage, repeat debridements, and secondary closure. This type of wound management can be difficult for nursing staff and uncomfortable for the patient. This paper discusses the results of debridement and immediate closure over drain tubes in eight cases from one surgeon’s practice in two tertiary hospitals. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients from a personal database. Over a five year period, 178 instrumented posterior spine surgeries, in all regions of the spine, were performed. The indications for surgery included trauma, scoliosis, degenerative conditions, tumour, and other deformities in decreasing order of frequency. In this group, there were eight deep wound infections requiring debridement. All were in the thoracic and/or lumbar region. In two patients with non-fusion rods, the implants were removed. In six patients the implants were retained. All wounds were closed immediately over 16 Fr drain tubes. Follow-up times range from 4 years to 3 months. Results: No wounds required repeat debridement or developed subsequent breakdown. No patient had any further significant septic episodes. The drain tubes remained in situ for a time ranging from five days to three weeks. Of the two patients who had their implants removed at debridement, one remained on antibiotics for six weeks and the other for three months. Four patients remained on antibiotics for one year. One patient had removal of the implants before ceasing the antibiotics but the other three have not had a recurrence of infection despite retaining their implants. Two patients remain on lifelong antibiotics. Discussion: Debridement and immediate wound closure, in concert with the appropriate antibiotic, after post-operative deep wound infection can be successful with the benefit of less discomfort for the patient and greater ease of nursing care

INTRODUCTION: The principles of treatment of deep wound infection around bony implants involve appropriate antibiotics, drainage, repeat debridements, and secondary closure. This type of wound management can be difficult for nursing staff and uncomfortable for the patient. This paper discusses the results of debridement and immediate closure over drain tubes in eight cases from one surgeon’s practice in two tertiary hospitals. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients from a personal database. Over a five year period, 178 instrumented posterior spine surgeries, in all regions of the spine, were performed. The indications for surgery included trauma, scoliosis, degenerative conditions, tumour, and other deformities in decreasing order of frequency. In this group, there were eight deep wound infections requiring debridement. All were in the thoracic and/or lumbar region. In two patients with non-fusion rods, the implants were removed. In six patients the implants were retained. All wounds were closed immediately over 16 Fr drain tubes. Follow-up times range from four years to three months. RESULTS: No wounds required repeat debridement or developed subsequent breakdown. No patient had any further significant septic episodes. The drain tubes remained in situ for a time ranging from five days to three weeks. Of the two patients who had their implants removed at debridement, one remained on antibiotics for six weeks and the other for three months. Four patients remained on antibiotics for one year. One patient had removal of the implants before ceasing the antibiotics but the other three have not had a recurrence of infection despite retaining their implants. Two patients remain on lifelong antibiotics. DISCUSSION: Debridement and immediate wound closure, in concert with the appropriate antibiotic, after post-operative deep wound infection can be successful with the benefit of less discomfort for the patient and greater ease of nursing care

We have investigated whether the use of laminar-flow theatres and space suits reduced the rate of revision for early deep infection after total hip (THR) and knee (TKR) replacement by reviewing the results of the New Zealand Joint Registry at ten years. Of the 51 485 primary THRs and 36 826 primary TKRs analysed, laminar-flow theatres were used in 35.5% and space suits in 23.5%. For THR there was a significant increase in early infection in those procedures performed with the use of a space suit compared with those without (p < 0.0001), in those carried out in a laminar-flow theatre compared with a conventional theatre (p < 0.003) and in those undertaken in a laminar-flow theatre with a space suit (p < 0.001) when compared with conventional theatres without such a suit. The results were similar for TKR with the use of a space suit (p < 0.001), in laminar-flow theatres (p < 0.019) and when space suits were used in those theatres (p < 0.001). These findings were independent of age, disease and operating time and were unchanged when the surgeons and hospital were analysed individually. The rate of revision for early deep infection has not been reduced by using laminar flow and space suits. Our results question the rationale for their increasing use in routine joint replacement, where the added cost to the health system seems to be unjustified

Treatment of an infected total elbow replacement (TER) is often successful in eradicating or suppressing the infection. However, the extensor mechanism may be compromised by both the infection and the surgery. The goal of this study was to assess triceps function in patients treated for deep infection complicating a TER. Between 1976 and 2007 a total of 217 TERs in 207 patients were treated for infection of a TER at our institution. Superficial infections and those that underwent resection arthroplasty were excluded, leaving 93 TERs. Triceps function was assessed by examination and a questionnaire. Outcome was measured using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Triceps weakness was identified in 51 TERs (49 patients, 55%). At a mean follow-up of five years (0.8 to 34), the extensor mechanism was intact in 13 patients, with the remaining 38 having bone or soft-tissue loss. The mean MEPS was 70 points (5 to 100), with a mean functional score of 18 (0 to 25) of a possible 25 points. Infection following TER can often be eradicated; however, triceps weakness occurs in more than half of the patients and may represent a major functional problem. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:82–7

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess preoperative bone stock and immediate postoperative cement-bone interface as factors affecting infection control and mechanical outcome after one stage revision total hip replacement (THR) for deep infection. Material and methods: This study included 115 cases which satisfied following conditions; a) One stage revision THRs for deep infection were carried out by a single surgeon (BMW). b) Follow-up of more than five years was possible. c) Complete series of radiographs were available including preoperative, immediate postoperative and the latest follow-up ones. Preoperative bone stock was classified into four grades (Grade 0: No bone loss, Grade 1: Demarcation, Grade 2: Localized cavitation, Grade 3: Significant bone loss). Immediate postoperative cement-bone interface was also graded into four categories (Grade A: White-out, obscure interface, Grade B: Clear line, no measurable gap, Grade C: Gap> 1mm, Grade D< 1mm). These two factors were analysed in view of infection control and mechanical survival of implants after surgery. Results: Preoperative bone stock did not show significant influence on infection control while it affected mechanical outcome. Immediate postoperative cement-bone interface was an affecting factor for not only mechanical survival of implants but cure of infection. Conclusion: Preoperative bone stock and immediate postoperative cement-bone interface were assessed as influential factors in one stage revision THR for deep infection. There was a good chance of cure of infection even in cases with significant bone loss. Good cement fixation appeared to be important in view of infection control as well as mechanical survival of implants

Of 960 first-revision total hip replacements (THR) because of deep infection identified in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registry, 16.9% were treated with a permanent implant extraction, while a staged or direct reconstruction revision protocol were employed in 56.2% and 26.9% respectively. The majority of the interventions were performed more than one year after index THR, and the dominating pathogen was coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS). We found a significant shift in types of bacteria over the years (Chi-square test, p smaller than 0.001): an increase in the CNS group and a decrease in Gram-negative aerobes. Patients treated with a permanent resection were generally older (p< 0.001), had more often a previous ipsilateral hip fracture (p< 0.001), and had more frequently Gram-negative infections (p=0.02). No systematic differences in patient characteristics or pathogens were detected between one-stage or two-stage procedures, of which the latter had a median re-implantation time of 2 (range: 0.2–62) months. Of 798 (one- or two-stage) revisions, 60 (7.5%) were revised again due to recurrent infection, with no difference between the two methods, and implying a 10-year survival of 90%; 95% confidence interval (CI95%) 88.2–93.0. Previous surgery for soft-tissue problems (RR 3.2 (CI95% 1.3–7.2)) predicted a worse outcome for one-stage procedures. The prognosis of two-staged revisions improved with increasing re-implantation interval (RR 0.8 (CI95% 0.7–1.0)) per month, and a 6 month interval carried the lowest risk of repeat revision due to infection; RR 0.1 (CI95% 0.0–0.9). Staged revisions in female patients (RR 2.3, (CI95% 0.9–5.7)) and with Staphylococcus aureus infections (RR 2.3 (CI95% 0.9–5.5)) predicted a worse outcome. Ten-year survival with repeat revision for aseptic loosening as end-point was 89% (95%CI 85.7–92.0), but decreased to 79% when all reasons for revision were taken into account (95%CI 75.0–82.3) mainly because of revision for peri-prosthetic fractures. The results suggest that direct and staged revision protocols can have a good prognosis on a national level, but efforts must be made to counteract periprosthetic fractures and the high incidence of permanent implant extraction in elderly patients

Tumour necrosis factor-alpha is a proinflammatory cytokine that has been implicated in the propagation of inflammatory responses to bacterial infection and wear debris particles around loosened total hip replacements (THR). Individual TNF responses to such stimuli may be dictated by genetic variation. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at several loci within the TNF gene are associated with disease severity and susceptibility in a number of inflammatory conditions, but only a few SNPs have been screened in any one study. 14 SNPs have been identified within the TNF gene. Our unit has previously demonstrated that 5 SNPs are monomorphic in a sample group of UK Caucasians. We performed a case control study of the remaining 9 polymorphic positions (−1031, −863, −857, −376, −308, −238, +489, +851 and +1304) for possible association with deep sepsis or aseptic loosening. All patients included in the study were Caucasian and had had a cemented Charnley THR and polyethylene cup. Cases consisted of 44 patients with early aseptic loosening (defined as that occurring within 6 years of implantation and findings at revision surgery or by the criteria of Hodgkinson et al for the acetabulum and Harris for the femoral stem) and 30 patients with microbiological evidence at surgery of deep infection. Controls consisted of 85 THRs that had remained clinically asymptomatic for over 10 years and demonstrated no radiographic features of aseptic loosening or ‘at risk’ signs as described by Wroblewski et al. DNA was extracted from venous blood and genotyped by Snapshot assay. Genotype and allele frequencies for all SNPs were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium between THR controls and a random sample of UK Caucasians. The most significant associations were between the −238A (p< 0.05) and −863T (p< 0.05) alleles and aseptic loosening. A trend towards association was found between the −863A SNP and deep infection (p=0.80). The −238 A/G and −863 G/T genotypes were associated with deep infection (p< 0.05). No other significant associations were found. Genetic polymorphism of TNF appears to play a significant role in THR aseptic loosening and possibly in deep infection. SNP markers may serve as predictors of implant survival and response to therapy such as anti-TNF treatment

Introduction and Aims: The purpose of this study was to assess pre-operative bone stock and immediate postoperative cement-bone interface as factors affecting infection control and mechanical outcome after one stage revision THR for deep infection. Method: This study included 115 cases which satisfied the following conditions: 1) One stage revision THR for deep infection was the primary intervention for infected hip replacement by a single surgeon (BMW) unless the bone stock was too poor for fixing implants; 2) follow-up of more than five years; 3) A complete series of radiographs was available for radiological study including pre-operative and immediate post-operative ones. Pre-operative bone stock was classified into four grades (Grade 0: No bone loss, Grade 1: Demarcation, Grade 2: Localised cavitation, Grade 3: Extensive bone loss). The immediate post-operative cement-bone interface was also graded into four categories (Grade A: White-out, obscure interface, Grade B: Clear line, no measurable gap, Grade C: Gap> 1mm, Grade D< 1mm). These two factors were analysed with regard to infection control and the mechanical survival of implants after surgery. Results: Bone stock did not have significant influence on infection control, while it did affect mechanical outcome. The cement-bone interface was an affecting factor for not only the mechanical survival of implants but also the cure of infection. Conclusion: There was a good chance of curing the infection even with extensive bone loss. Good cement fixation was an important factor with regard to infection control, as well as the mechanical survival of implants. The results suggested that it was important to shield the medullary space from the infected joint space with antibiotic-loaded cement in revision THR for deep infection

Introduction. Despite the advances in adjuvant chemotherapy and surgical techniques, the diagnosis of a bone tumour still carries with it a significant risk of mortality. This study investigates factors affecting survival, in patients treated for malignant tumours of bone using Endoprosthetic replacement (EPR). Methods. Our tertiary referral musculoskeletal tumour unit has taken referrals over 40 years. Electronic patient records have been prospectively kept on all patients seen since 1986 and data has been entered retrospectively for patients seen between 1966 and 1986. A consecutive series of 1264 patients underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction; after 158 patients were excluded, 1106 patients were left in the study group. Factors including diagnosis, size of tumour, surgical margins, percentage tumour necrosis following chemotherapy, tumour site, local recurrence, decade of reconstruction, fracture and post-operative deep infection were analysed. Results. Overall population survival was 58.4% at 5 years, 50.5% at 10 years and 44.6% at 20 years. Significant prognostic factors on cox-regression analysis included locally recurrent disease (p<0.001), metastatic disease (p<0.001), chemotherapy (p<0.001), percentage tumour necrosis after chemotherapy (p=0.001), tumour size (p<0.001), post-operative surgical margin (p<0.001), fracture (p<0.001) and post-operative deep infection (p=0.05). Univariate analysis showed proximal femoral site (p=0.01) and EPRs after 1991 (p=0.05) were significant factors. Patients diagnosed with a deep infection within 2.5 years from implantation had 63.2% 10 year survival, compared to 49.4% in the non infected group. When stratified by diagnosis this was significant in patients with myeloma (p=0.01) and a showed strong trend in those with osteosarcoma (p=0.1). Trends towards better survival with Staphylococcal infections (p=0.2) were not demonstrated with other organisms. Discussion and conclusion. Several known prognostic factors were demonstrated for malignant bone tumours but there was evidence for increased survival after deep post-operative infection. The authors feel the results of this study and other recent evidence warrant further investigation

The study aimed to determine if THR deep infection rate correlated with the Nosocomial Infection National Surveillance Scheme (NINSS) data on the surgical site infection (SSI) rate in our institution. Deep infection is a serious complication of hip replacement but presents late. It has recently been reported that 10% of superficial infections develop deep prosthetic infections. NINSS data could therefore be used to predict a unit’s infection risk. This District General Hospital has only recently entered NINSS. In the first quarter of 2001, NINSS reported an 11.9% surgical site infection rate in THRS performed in this unit. A clinical audit of all the primary THRs done between 1/4/94 – 9/9/2001, using revision surgery as the end point, was conducted to determine the true deep infection rate. Patients were identified using the OPCS coding system database and a casenote review was performed on all revision hip operations done locally. A search for our primary THRs that underwent revision surgery at the regional tertiary referral centre was completed to avoid omissions secondary to migration. Of 1258 primary THRS, there were 13 revisions (1%) of which 2 were done for infection (0.16%). NINSS data placed our unit on the 90th centile for infection risk but our historical true deep infection rate of 0.16% compares favourably with the Swedish and Trent hip registry rates of 0.58% and 1.4% respectively. We therefore urge careful interpretation of NINSS data and argue against its use in the media. The quarterly reporting of SSIs may be too short to play a role in ranking hospitals but may be helpful in prophylactic antibiotic selection

Purpose. Traditional recommendations suggest that open fractures require urgent surgical debridement to reduce infection. Although many papers comparing early vs late debridement have found no difference in infection rates, these papers have not taken into account important confounding factors. We attempt to answer whether delay between injury and surgical debridement in open fractures is associated with a higher infection rate after accounting for these important confounders. Method. Five hundred and twenty three open extremity fractures in 417 patients were identified using the Sunnybrook trauma and orthopaedic department registries. Thirty patients (36 fractures) did not have complete follow-up. Seven patients were excluded due to incomplete data (complete follow-up rate=91%). A further 14 patients died during their hospitalization. A total of 459 fractures in 364 patients were reviewed. Data was collected on demographics, ISS score, ASA, time to initial operative debridement, timing of antibiotic administration, mechanism of injury, presence of significant contamination, and Gustillo-Anderson fracture grade. Deep infection was defined as an unplanned return to the operating room for treatment of infection. The influence of time to initial debridement was examined in an unadjusted analysis as a continuous variable and at thresholds of 6 and 12 hours of delay. A multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of delay while controlling for important confounding variables. Results. 46 deep infections occurred in 459 fractures (10%). In an unadjusted analysis, infection was associated with male sex(p=0.038), higher fracture grade(p=0.007), tibial fractures(p=0.027) and gross contamination (p=0.0001). In an unadjusted analysis, delay to debridement was not associated with deep infection (p=0.08) however, higher grade fractures, tibial fractures and grossly contaminated fractures were debrided earlier than less severe open fractures. Multivariable analysis showed infection was associated with each additional hour of delay (OR=1.033 95%CI 1.01 to 1.057), tibial fractures (OR=2.44 95%CI 1.26 to 4.73), higher Anderson & Gustillo grade (OR=1.99 95%CI 1.004 to 3.954), and gross contamination (OR=3.12 95%CI 1.36 to 7.36). Conclusion. Among more severe open fractures the impact of delay to debridement translates into a larger absolute increase in probability of infection. For example, a grade 2 injury of the forearm without contamination will have a predicted infection rate increase from 2.38% to 2.86% with an additional 6 hours of delay. However, a grade 3b tibial fracture with contamination will have a predicted infection rate increase from 35.6% to 43.3% with 6 hours of further delay. We recommend severe open fractures be debrided emergently while less severe open fractures be debrided urgently

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) complicates between 0.5% and 1.2% primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and may have devastating consequences. The traditional assessment of patients suffering from PJI has involved the serological study of inflammatory markers and microbiological analysis of samples obtained from the joint space. Treatment has involved debridement and revision arthroplasty performed in either one or two stages.

We present an update on the burden of PJI, strategies for its diagnosis and treatment, the challenge of resistant organisms and the need for definitive evidence to guide the treatment of PJI after THA.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):27–30.

Background. Traditional recommendations suggest that open fractures require urgent surgical debridement to reduce infection. However, this has recently been challenged by a number of investigations. However, in many cases, these studies were not able to control for important confounding factors. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the relationship between delay to definitive surgical debridement while controlling for important confounders. Method. 364 patients with 459 open fractures treated at a level one trauma centre over four years were reviewed. Time to definitive surgical debridement was modelled as a predictor of infection while controlling for fracture grade, anatomic site of fracture, and presence of significant contamination. Time to debridement was modelled as both a continuous variable and a categorical variable with cut off points at 6 and 12 hours of delay. Results. 46 deep infections occurred in 459 fractures(10%). There were no infections among grade one open fractures(0/55). Delay to debridement using cut-points of 6 hours and 12 hours was not associated with an increased infection rate. However, with delay to debridement analyzed as a continuous variable each additional hour of delay was associated with an increase in the odds of infection(OR=1.033 95%CI 1.01–1.057). Multivariable analysis also showed that infection was associated with tibial fractures(OR=2.44 95%CI 1.26–4.73), higher Anderson & Gustillo grade (OR=1.99 95%CI 1.004–3.954), and gross contamination (OR=3.12 95%CI 1.36–7.36). Among more severe open fractures the impact of delay to debridement translates into a larger absolute increase in probability of infection. Conclusion. We recommend that higher grade open fractures be treated with definitive debridement as soon as possible given that the risk of infection increases in a linear fashion with time delay. For severe open fractures, especially tibial, we recommend emergent debridement as soon as the patient has been resuscitated and is stable enough to undergo surgery

This study aims to determine the incidence of surgical site infection leading to reoperation for sepsis following minor hand procedures performed outside the main operating room using field sterility in the South African setting.

The investigators retrospectively reviewed the records of 485 patients who had WALANT-assisted minor hand surgery outside a main operating theatre, a field sterility setting between March 2019 and April 2023. The primary outcome was the presence or absence of deep surgical site infection that required reoperation within four weeks. Cases included where elective WALANT minor hand procedures, a minimum age of 18 with complete clinical records.

The patients were mostly female (54.8%), with a mean age of 56.35 years. The majority of cases were trigger finger and carpal tunnel release. An overall 485 cases were reviewed, the deep surgical site infection rate resulting in reoperation within 4 weeks post-operatively was 1.24% ((95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.0034 to 0.0237); p = 0.009).

Minor hand procedures performed under field sterility using WALANT have a low surgical site infection rate. The current study's infection rates are comparable to international surgical site infection rates for similar surgeries performed in main operating rooms using standard sterilisation procedures. Field sterility is a safe and acceptable clinical practice that may improve work efficiency in public sector.

We have carried out in 24 patients, a two-stage revision arthroplasty of the hip for infection with massive bone loss. We used a custom-made, antibiotic-loaded cement prosthesis as an interim spacer. Fifteen patients had acetabular deficiencies, eight had segmental femoral bone loss and one had a combined defect.

There was no recurrence of infection at a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (2 to 7). A total of 21 patients remained mobile in the interim period. The mean Merle D’Aubigné and Postel hip score improved from 7.3 points before operation to 13.2 between stages and to 15.8 at the final follow-up. The allograft appeared to have incorporated into the host bone in all patients. Complications included two fractures and one dislocation of the cement prosthesis.

The use of a temporary spacer maintains the function of the joint between stages even when there is extensive loss of bone. Allograft used in revision surgery after septic conditions restores bone stock without the risk of recurrent infection.

Introduction: The evolving pattern of bacterial resistance at septic revision surgery to the common antibiotics used during total hip arthroplasty is described.

Methods: A retrospective review of 72 case notes and microbiology data inclusive of bacterial sensitivity profiles was undertaken between January 2002 and April 2007. Data collected was combined with a previous study to demonstrate bacteriology trends over the last thirty years (327 cases). Antibiotic sensitivities to the two common infectious agents, Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococi were formulated into a hypothetical model combined with Gentamycin sensitivity, a constant factor (the sole antibiotic in bone cement), to assess the efficacy of the combination of antibiotics used in primary arthroplasty.

Results: When compared to previous microbiology data percentage isolates of each bacterium were found to be similar, confirming that the infectious agents at septic revision had remained the same, and were the common contaminants at primary surgery. The results also demonstrated an overall trend of increased resistance of the major organisms to the major classes of antibiotics used. Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci were routinely tested against nine common antibiotics, inclusive of Gentamycin. Critical findings showed that the regimen used in routine primary surgery covers only 67% of staphylococcus infections (cefuroxine and Gentamycin); combinations that showed increased coverage included clindamycin and Gentamycin, and rifampicin plus Gentamycin, providing in excess of 100% coverage, and Erythromycin and Gentamycin, coverage in excess of 80%.

Discussion: Consequently we can recommend from prospective analysis of common infections at septic revision, that the antibiotic regimen at primary surgery is not sufficient to prevent infection (in isolation). Dynamic variations continuously develop in bacteria; genetic make up is regulated to optimise survival, continuously detrimentally affecting the efficacy of antibiotics against the power of super bugs, indicating a pattern in need of continuous monitoring and review.

The practice at most centers in North America for the investigation and management of non-acute infection after hip replacement has been relatively standard for some time. Diagnosis has depended on a thorough history, physical examination, plain radiographs, straightforward laboratory inflammatory markers, joint aspiration for bacteriologic study, intraoperative frozen section in selected cases, and intraoperative synovial biopsies for confirmatory bacteriologic evaluation. The cornerstone of treatment on this continent has revolved around two-stage revision hip replacement, with increasing popularity for the use of interval articulating antibiotic loaded spacers, and increasing use of cementless fixation at the second stage. But this standard approach has been under increasing scrutiny in recent years, for good reason.

The use of more precise “best evidence” paradigms on which to base the diagnosis have been developed. There is encouraging work on the application of more specific synovial and serum markers. The need to remove all implant material in all cases has been challenged. And there is evidence that the two stage approach is associated with greater morbidity, mortality and cost. The latter has led to a re-examination of the role and results of single-stage exchange revision, at least in selected cases, where the patient is immune competent, the soft tissue and bone anatomy is not badly deficient, the organism is known, and the antibiotic sensitivity is favorable.

The most encouraging of the recent developments is the increasing consensus that multicenter collaborative study is required if we are to make genuine progress in the one-stage/two-stage debate. At least one multicenter prospective randomised study is scheduled to commence in 2015.

Background

Periprostetic joint infections (PJI) are often difficult to diagnose, to treat and often leave the patient with severe impaired function. The presence of low virulent bacteria is frequently discovered in apparent aseptic revisions of shoulder arthroplasties and pose a challenge to diagnose preoperatively.

Dual Isotope In111 Leucocyte/ Tc99 Bone Marrow SPECT CT scan (L/BMS) is considered the radionuclide gold standard in preoperative diagnosing PJI with reported high specificity and sensitivity in hip and knee arthroplasties.

Unfortunately, it is labour-intensive and expensive to perform and documentation using L/BMS on shoulder arthroplasties lack.

Aims

The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of positive cultures during the second stage of a two-stage revision arthroplasty and to analyse the association between positive cultures and an infection-free outcome.