Background. The aim of this study was to identify and quantify any benefits of early active treatment of paediatric femoral shaft fractures for patients, their families, and the hospital. Patients and methods. Our protocol (1999-2002) uses flexible intramedullary nails for children older than five, early hip spica (within one week of injury) for the under five year olds, and external fixation for polytrauma (Early Active Group[EAG], n = 25). Prior to this (1999-2002), treatment consisted of late application of a hip spica (3-4 weeks following injury) or inpatient traction (Traditional Group [TG], n = 41). Outcome measures were length of hospital stay, degree of malunion, knee and hip movements, and leg length discrepancy. The financial burden to the family including waged and non-waged time lost, transport, childminder, and other extra costs were estimated. Hospital costs including inpatient stay, theatre, and implant costs were analysed. Results. A 40% reduction in the incidence of femoral fractures over the six-year period was noted. Mean hospital stay was 29 and 10 nights (p<0.001); family costs were £1,243 and £968; and hospital costs were £10,831 and £4,291 per patient (p<0.005) in the TG and the EAG respectively. Parents in both groups preferred early discharge (86%-94%). In the EAG, 10 patients were short at 3 months (0.5 - 3 cm). None was short at 2 years. Eight children were long at 2 years. At 2 years, all had good clinical and functional results. There was no significant difference in the mal-union rate between the two groups. All the fractures united by three months. Five out of nine complications occurred in the EAG. Conclusion. The use of our early active treatment protocol has resulted in a significant reduction in hospital stay, costs to the families and the hospital

Desmoid tumours are a rare fibroblastic proliferation of monoclonal origin, arising in deep soft-tissues. Histologically, they are characterized by locally aggressive behaviour and an inability to metastasize, and clinically by a heterogeneous and unpredictable course. Desmoid tumours can occur in any anatomical site, but commonly arise in the limbs. Despite their benign nature, they can be extremely disabling and sometimes life-threatening, causing severe pain and functional limitations. Their surgical management is complex and challenging, due to uncertainties surrounding the biological and clinical behaviour, rarity, and limited available literature. Resection has been the first-line approach for patients with a desmoid tumour but, during the last few decades, a shift towards a more conservative approach has occurred, with an initial ‘wait and see’ policy. Many medical and regional forms of treatment are also available for the management of this condition, and others have recently emerged with promising results. However, many areas of controversy remain, and further studies and global collaboration are needed to obtain prospective and randomized data, in order to develop an appropriate shared stepwise approach.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(7):729–734.

The aim of this study was to compare the modern treatments for femoral fractures in children to see if they have any advantages over traditional treatments. The modern treatments are mainly operative with the objective is to get the children mobilising early and to minimise the time spent in hospital. We studied 66 children who had sustained a traumatic femoral shaft fracture, over a six-year period with a minimum follow up of two years. A protocol using early hip spicas for under 5 year olds, flexible intramedullary nails for over 5 year olds, and external fixation for the polytrauma cases was started in 1999. Over a three-year period there were 25 children who sustained a fracture (Early active group). These were prospectively reviewed with a minimum follow up of 24 months. The outcome measures being, length of hospital stay, degree of mal-union, range of movement of the hip and knee, leg length discrepancy, pain and functional restrictions. This modern patient group was compared with all the fractures in the three years prior to the new protocol commencing. This group were treated usually with in patient traction (Traditional group). There were 41 children in this group who had sustained a fracture between 1996 and 1999.

The mean length of hospital stay was 32 nights in the traditional group and 19 nights in the early active group (p less than 0.001). If we exclude the children who were severely injured with multiple injuries the mean stay is 29 nights and 10 nights (p less than 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mal-union rate between the two groups. Very few had pain and at 2 years they all had good clinical and functional results. The only significant complication rate was with the fractures that were treated with an external fixator. These were mainly pin site infections. In our population there has been a 40% reduction in the incidence of femoral fractures over the six-year period for which we have no explanation.

These modern treatments have resulted in a shorter hospital stay that has many advantages for the child and family as well as financial savings.

Tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis or lateral elbow tendinopathy) is a self-limiting condition in most patients. Surgery is often offered to patients who fail to improve with conservative treatment. However, there is no evidence to support the superiority of surgery over continued nonoperative care or no treatment. New evidence also suggests that the prognosis of tennis elbow is not influenced by the duration of symptoms, and that there is a 50% probability of recovery every three to four months. This finding challenges the belief that failed nonoperative care is an indication for surgery. In this annotation, we discuss the clinical and research implications of the benign clinical course of tennis elbow.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):109–111.

Background: Reviews have showed none or little efficacy of passive conservative treatment modalities for patients with sciatica, reviews on surgery are conflicting. Cohort studies have shown high efficacy of active conservative treatment for patients with sciatica. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of two active conservative treatment programs to patients with severe sciatica. Methods: The study was a prospective single-blind randomized clinical controlled trial of 181 consecutive patients with radicular pain below the knee. The patients were examined at baseline, 8 weeks later at post treatment follow-up, and at one year follow-up. In both groups treatment consisted of thorough Information concerning anatomy, pathogenesis, how discs heal without surgery, and Advice and encouragement to stay as active as possible, and optional medication. Then either Symptom guided exercises or Sham exercises. Results: All patients experienced a highly significant and clinically important improvement in global assessment, functional status, pain, vocational status, and clinical findings. The Symptom guided exercises + Information + Advice to stay active group (SYMIA) was significantly superior to the Sham exercises + Information + Advice to stay active group (SHAMIA) with regards to global assessment, clinical findings, sick leave and vocational status both at end of treatment and one year follow-up. There was a borderline significant difference in leg pain at end of treatment, and no difference was found in RMQ and EQ-5D. Conclusion: Patients who had symptoms and clinical findings which would qualify them for surgery in most hospitals improved greatly with active conservative treatment. Although the patients had greater faith in the SHAMIA before treatment, the SYMIA treatment was superior in most outcomes

Abstract. Objective. Meta-analysis of clinical trials highlights that non-operative management of degenerative knee meniscal tears is as effective as surgical management. Surgical guidelines though support arthroscopic partial meniscectomy which remains common in NHS practice. Physiotherapists are playing an increasing role in triage of such patients though it is unclear how this influences clinical management and patient outcomes. Methods. A 1-year cohort (July 2019–June 2020) of patients presenting with MRI confirmed degenerative meniscal tears to a regional orthopaedic referral centre (3× ESP physiotherapists) was identified. Initial clinical management was obtained from medical records alongside subsequent secondary care management and routinely collected outcome scores in the following 2-years. Management options included referral for surgery, conservative (steroid injection and rehabilitation), and no active treatment. Outcome scores collected at 1- and 2-years included the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) questionnaire and 0–10 numerical rating scales for worst and average pain. Treatment allocation is presented as absolute and proportional figures. Change in outcomes across the cohort was evaluated with repeated measures ANOVA, with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, and post-hoc Tukey pair-wise comparisons. As treatment decision is discrete, no direct contrast is made between outcomes of differing interventions but additional explorative outcome change over time evaluated by group. Significance was accepted at p=0.05 and effect size as per Cohen's values. Results. 81 patients, 50 (61.7%) male, mean age 46.5 years (SD13.13) presented in the study timeframe. 32 (40.3%) received conservative management and 49 (59.7%) were listed for surgery. Six (18.8%) of the 32 underwent subsequent surgery and nine of the 49 (18.4%) patients switched from planned surgery to receiving non-operative care. Two post-operative complications were noted, one cerebrovascular accident and one deep vein thrombosis. The cohort improved over the course of 2-years in all outcome measures with improved mean FJS-12 (34.36 points), mean worst pain (3.74 points) average pain (2.42 points) scores. Overall change (all patients) was statistically significant for all outcomes (p<0.001), with sequential year-on-year change also significant (p<0.001). Effect size of these changes were large with all Cohen-d values over 1. Controlling for age and BMI, males reported superior change in FJS-12 (p=0.04) but worse pain outcomes (p<0.03). Further explorative analysis highlighted positive outcomes across all surgical, conservative and no active treatment groups (p<0.05). The 15 (18%) patients that switched between surgical and non-surgical management also reported positive outcome scores (p<0.05). Conclusion(s). In a regional specialist physiotherapy-led soft tissue knee clinic around 60% of degenerative meniscal tears assessed were referred for surgery. Over 2-years, surgical, non-operative and no treatment management approaches in this cohort all resulted in clinical improvement suggesting that no single strategy is effective in directly treating the meniscal pathology, and that perhaps none do. Clinical intervention rather is directed at individual symptom management based on clinical preferences. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

The June 2023 Foot & Ankle Roundup. 360. looks at: Nail versus plate fixation for ankle fractures; Outcomes of first ray amputation in diabetic patients; Vascular calcification on plain radiographs of the ankle to diagnose diabetes mellitus; Elderly patients with ankle fracture: the case for early weight-bearing; Active treatment for Frieberg’s disease: does it work?; Survival of ankle arthroplasty; Complications following ankle arthroscopy

The requirement for the peer support groups were born out of concern for the psychological wellbeing of the paediatric patients and to assess if this would improve their wellbeing during their treatment. Groupwork is a method of Social Work which is recognised as a powerful tool to allow people meet their need for belonging while also creating the forum for group members to empower one another. Social Work meet with all paediatric patients attending the limb reconstruction service in the hospital. The focus of the Medical Social Worker (MSW) is to provide practical and emotional support to the patient and their parent/guardian regarding coping with the frame. Some of the challenges identified through this direct work include patient's struggling with the appearance of the frame and allowing peers to see the frame. The peer support group aims to offer its attendees the opportunities to engage with fellow paediatric patients in the same position. It allowed them to visually identify with one another. We wanted to create a safe space to discuss the emotional impact of treatment and the frames. It normalises the common problems paediatric patients face during treatment. We assisted our participants to identify new coping techniques and actions they can take to make their journey through limb reconstruction treatment more manageable. Finally, we aimed to offer the parents space to similarly seek peer support with regard to caring for a child in treatment. All paediatric patients were under the care of the Paediatric Orthopaedic Consultant and were actively engaging with the limb reconstruction multi-disciplinary team (MDT). The patient selection was completed by the MDT; based on age, required to be in active treatment, or their frames were removed within one month prior to the group's commencement. Qualitative data was collected through written questionnaires and reflection from participants in MSW sessions. We also used observational data from direct verbal feedback from the MDT. In the first group, parents gave feedback due to participants age and completed written feedback forms. For our second group, initial feedback was collated from the participants after the first session to get an understanding of group expectations. Upon completion, we collected data from both the participants and the parents. Qualitative and scaling questions gathered feedback on their experience of participating in the group. We held two peer support groups in 2022:One group for patients aged between 3–6 years in January 2022 across two sessions, which was attended by four patients. The second group for young teenage patients aged between 11–15 years in April 2022 across four sessions, which was attended by five patients. The written feedback received from group one focused on eliciting the participant's experience of the groupwork. 100% of participants identified the shared experience as the main benefit of the groupwork. 100% of participants agreed they would attend a peer support group again, and no participant had suggestions for improvement to the group. Feedback did indicate that group work at the beginning of treatment could be more beneficial. In relation to the second group, 60% of the paediatric patients and their parents returned the questionnaires. All of the parent's feedback identified that it was beneficial for their child to meet peers in a similar situation. They agreed that it was beneficial to meet other parents, so they could get support and advice from one another. On a scale between 1 and 5, 5 being the highest score, the participants scored high on the group work meeting their expectations, enjoyment of the sessions, and the group work was a beneficial aspect of their treatment. All respondents would strongly recommend groupwork to other paediatric patients attending for limb reconstruction treatment. Overall, the MDT limb reconstruction team, found the peer support group work of great benefit to the participants and their parents. The MSW team identified that during a period on the limb reconstruction team, when a high number of patients were in active treatment, the workload of the MSW also increased reflecting this activity. Common issues and concerns were raised directly to MSW (particularly from group two) regarding numerous difficulties they experienced trying to cope with the frame. The group work facilitators created a space where the participants could get peer support, share issues caused by the frame, hear directly from others, and that they too experience similar feelings or issues. Collectively, they identified ways of coping and promoting their own wellbeing while in treatment. The participants in group two, subsequently created a group on social media, to be able to continue their newly formed friendships and to continue to update one another on their treatment journeys. The participants self-requested another group in the future. This was facilitated in November 2023, the facilitators sought more feedback from all participants and their parents after this session. These findings will contribute towards the analysis for the presentation. Peer support groupwork was presented at the hospital's foundation day and has been well received by senior management in the hospital, as a positive addition to the limb reconstruction service. The focus of the MDT in 2024, is to further develop and facilitate more peer support groups for our paediatric patients

Hypothesis. Pre-specified pooling of data from the four phase III RECORD studies was conducted to determine whether rivaroxaban significantly reduced the less-frequent clinical endpoint of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and all-cause mortality after total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA, respectively), compared with standard North American and European enoxaparin regimens. Methods and analysis. Patients (n=12,729) received rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily or enoxaparin 40 mg once daily (RECORD1-3) or 30 mg 12-hourly (RECORD4). Thromboprophylaxis was administered for 31-39 days (RECORD1; THA) or 10-14 days (RECORD3 and 4; TKA). RECORD2 (THA) compared 31-39 days' rivaroxaban with 10-14 days' enoxaparin followed by placebo. The pre-specified primary efficacy endpoint in the pooled analysis (composite of symptomatic VTE and all-cause mortality) and adjudicated bleeding events were analysed in the day 12±2 active treatment pool, when all patients had received active drug, and total treatment duration pool, where subgroup analyses were performed. Results. In the day 12±2 active treatment pool, the primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 0.5% of patients receiving rivaroxaban versus 1.0% of patients receiving enoxaparin (p=0.001). Major bleeding occurred in 0.3% versus 0.2% patients respectively (p=0.18) and major plus clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 2.9% versus 2.5% patients respectively (p=0.19). In the total treatment duration pool, rivaroxaban significantly reduced the primary efficacy endpoint compared with enoxaparin regimens 0.6% versus 1.3% patients (p< 0.001) with similar rates of major bleeding. Over the total treatment period, rivaroxaban consistently reduced the primary efficacy endpoint across the pre-specified subgroups (age, gender, body weight, creatinine clearance). Conclusion. Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the composite of clinically important symptomatic VTE and all-cause mortality after THA or TKA compared with subcutaneous enoxaparin regimens in the direct comparison day 12±2 active treatment pool, with no significant differences in bleeding events. These results suggest a positive benefit-risk profile for oral, once-daily rivaroxaban

Tumours of the sacrum are difficult to manage. The sacrum provides the structural connection between the torso and lower half of the body and is subject to both axial and rotational forces. Thus, tumours or their treatment can compromise the stability of the spinopelvic junction. Additionally, nerves responsible for lower limb motor groups as well as bowel, bladder, and sexual function traverse or abut the sacrum. Preservation or sacrifice of these nerves in the treatment of sacral tumours has profound implications on the function and quality of life of the patient. This annotation will discuss current treatment protocols for sacral tumours.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1284–1291.

Aims

Gram-negative infections are associated with comorbid patients, but outcomes are less well understood. This study reviewed diagnosis, management, and treatment for a cohort treated in a tertiary spinal centre.

Aims

To estimate the potential cost-effectiveness of adalimumab compared with standard care alone for the treatment of early-stage Dupuytren’s disease (DD) and the value of further research from an NHS perspective.

Aims

To explore individuals’ experience of a scaphoid waist fracture and its subsequent treatment.

Introduction. Total joint arthroplasty is associated with substantial blood loss as well as changes in basic metabolic labs. Routinely patients receive multiple post-operative blood draws for measuring hematocrit, hemoglobin (H&H), and basic metabolic panels (BMP). Based on a multimodal approach to blood conservation and pre-operative optimization, we questioned the need to check daily labs on our inpatient primary total hip and knee patients. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for transfusion and metabolic abnormalities requiring treatment in an attempt to reduce the number of post-operative blood draws and labs. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed all 1134 patients who underwent primary total hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from July 2016 to March 2017 in our inpatient hospital setting. There were 733 TKA and 401 THA. Pre- and post-operative lab values were reviewed and correlated with transfusion and medical treatments. Results. Twelve patients received a post-operative transfusion (1.1%). In TKA patients 2 of 733 (0.2%) were transfused while in THA patients 10 of 401 (2.4%) were transfused. Of the 12 patients receiving transfusions 11 were females, and in all 12 the pre-operative hemoglobin was less than 13. For the overall series of 1134 patients, 176 (15.5%) required potassium chloride supplementation based on BMP. Only patients with pre-existing renal disease or diuretic treatment received potassium chloride supplementation. Conclusions. Based on our findings, only patients with pre-operative hemoglobin less than 13 require post-operative H&H. Additionally, only patients with low pre-operative potassium, history of renal disease, or active treatment with a diuretic require post-operative BMP

Background and objectives. Numerous approaches are recommended for the management of non-specific neck pain (NS-NP). However, the extent to which approaches are used is unclear. This survey investigated current UK physiotherapists' measurement and management of patients with NS-NP. Methods and results. Physiotherapists were invited to participate in an online survey if they were practicing in the UK and had experience of managing NS-NP. 2101 responses were received. Analysis of the results indicated the overall popularity of active treatment approaches with 84% and 61% of respondents employing exercise and patient education respectively. 48% of respondents reported using a multimodal approach (that is, combination of exercise and manual therapy with/without patient education). Over a third of respondents reported not using outcome measures (OMs) for NS-NP. Of the two-thirds who reported using OMs, the majority reported using pain and range of motion measures. Physical and functional limitations, psychological distress, and quality of life constructs, which are frequently associated with NS-NP, were rarely measured. Conclusion. The active interventions most frequently used in the management of NS-NP were supported by moderate to strong evidence but a variety of other commonly used approaches have limited, unclear or no evidence of efficacy. Multimodal treatment approaches that are supported by strong evidence of efficacy are less commonly used. Physiotherapists in the UK are inadequately evaluating NS-NP. Research and guidelines are needed to reduce the use of ineffective interventions, promote the use of multimodal care and develop high quality outcome measures that are relevant and feasible for use in clinical practice. Keywords. Health, survey, neck pain, non-specific, rehabilitation. Conflicts of interest: None. Sources of funding: None

Background. Previous research in people with musculoskeletal low back pain (MLBP) in primary care shows that a reliable and valid measure of consultation-based reassurance enables testing reassurance against patient' outcomes. Little is known about the role of reassurance in people with MLBP consulting spinal surgeons, especially in cases where surgeons recommend not to have surgery. There might be several reasons to exclude surgery as a treatment option, that range from positive messages about symptoms resolving to negative messages, suggesting that all reasonable avenue of treatment have been exhausted. AIM to explore patient's experience of consultation-based reassurance in people with MLBP who have been recently advised not to have surgery. Methods. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 low back pain patients who had recently consulted for spinal surgery and were advised that surgery is not indicated. Interview were audio recorded and transcribed, and then coded using NVIVO qualitative software and analysed using the Framework Analysis. Results. Most patients reported feeling dismissed and discouraged. They considered that consultants were better in relationship building and data gathering than in providing cognitive and generic reassurance. Major emerging themes included the complexity and confusion of their NHS journey, lack of continuity-of-care, lack of information for their condition and a sense of dismissal. Patients reported that they needed reassurance through clear explanations and discussion of pain management, but instead were discharged into a void. Conclusion. Effective communication with patients attending surgical settings to consult about their back pain is important, especially when no active treatment is being offered. No conflict of interest. Funded by a grant from EuroSpine awarded to Professor Tamar Pincus and carried out within the NHS

Aims

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular injections may provide a simple and minimally invasive treatment for early-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA). This has led to an increase in its adoption as a treatment for knee OA, although there is uncertainty about its efficacy and benefit. We hypothesized that patients with early-stage symptomatic knee OA who receive multiple PRP injections will have better clinical outcomes than those receiving single PRP or placebo injections.

Aims: Primary aim of this study was to evaluate the inßuence of simultaneous local anesthesia on the clinical outcome after repetitive low-energy extracorpreal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for chronic tennis elbow. Methods: 51 patients were treated in a randomized single-blind international multicenter trial with a parallel-group design and blinded independent observer to evaluate low-energy ESWT with local anesthesia versus placebo ESWT with local anesthesia for patients with a chronic tennis elbow at three-month follow-up. 85% of patients of the verum group did not achieve good/ excellent results in the Roles & Maudsley score, they were offered once again application of the identical active treatment concept, this time without local anesthesia. 80% of the patients of the placebo group did not achieve good/excellent results, they were offered crossover therapy, i.e. identical active treatment with local anesthesia. Results: Reception of active therapy without local anesthesia resulted in excellent or good outcomes in 80% of patients of the original verum group at three-month follow-up, while application of active therapy with local anesthesia lead to good outcomes in 27% of the original placebo group (p= 0.0092, power= 0.8). Conclusions: Local anesthesia has a negative inßuence on the clinical outcome after repetitive low-energy ESWT for chronic tennis elbow

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of injecting genetically engineered chondrocytes expressing transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) into the knees of patients with osteoarthritis. We assessed the resultant function, pain and quality of life. . A total of 54 patients (20 men, 34 women) who had a mean age of 58 years (50 to 66) were blinded and randomised (1:1) to receive a single injection of the active treatment or a placebo. We assessed post-treatment function, pain severity, physical function, quality of life and the incidence of treatment-associated adverse events. Patients were followed at four, 12 and 24 weeks after injection. At final follow-up the treatment group had a significantly greater improvement in the mean International Knee Documentation Committee score than the placebo group (16 points; -18 to 49, vs 8 points; -4 to 37, respectively; p = 0.03). The treatment group also had a significantly improved mean visual analogue score at final follow-up (-25; -85 to 34, vs -11 points; -51 to 25, respectively; p = 0.032). Both cohorts showed an improvement in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores, but these differences were not statistically significant. One patient had an anaphylactic reaction to the preservation medium, but recovered within 24 hours. All other adverse events were localised and resolved without further action. . This technique may result in improved clinical outcomes, with the aim of slowing the degenerative process, leading to improvements in pain and function. However, imaging and direct observational studies are needed to verify cartilage regeneration. Nevertheless, this study provided a sufficient basis to proceed to further clinical testing. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:924–32

The goals of perioperative management are to relieve pain, achieve early mobilization after surgery, reduce length of hospital stay, and obtain adequate patient satisfaction. Several treatment options combining systemic analgesics and/or regional analgesia with or without opioids are available for postoperative pain; however, a gold standard has not been established although there is a progressive shift towards multimodal approaches to improve analgesia while minimizing opioid-related side effects. EX-TRA-05 (DAVID-ART) was a randomised, double-blind, parallel, pivotal study, evaluating the analgesic efficacy and safety of the innovative oral combination of dexketoprofen/tramadol 25mg/75mg in comparison with the individual components (tramadol given at the higher dose of 100mg) on moderate to severe acute pain after total hip replacement. Repeated doses of study drug were administered every 8 hours and pain intensity (PI) was to be scored according to a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) on a programmed e-diary every 2 hours over a 56-hour period (i.e. along 7 repeated doses). A placebo arm was included at the first administration to validate the pain model. Rescue medication, metamizole 500mg, was available during the treatment period. The study primary endpoint was the mean sum of the pain intensity difference values throughout the first 8 hours (SPID. 8. ), which considered the 3 active treatment arms and placebo (ITT population; N=641). In this phase, a clear superiority of the combination over the single agents was demonstrated (p<0.05). An additional analysis was performed during the entire 0–56h repeated-dose period excluding those patients who had received placebo at the first dose (N=161). The estimated mean (SE) differences on PI-VAS over 24, 32 and 56 hours post first dose (0–24h, 0–32h, and 0–56h) between the combination and each single agent were evaluated. Patients who received active analgesic from the first dose (mITT population; N=480) were aged 29–80 years (42% were ≥65 years). At randomisation, pain was moderate (≥40–60mm) in 51% patients and severe (>60mm) in 49%. For dexketoprofen/tramadol, mean (SD) PI-VAS values were 22 (4.0) over 24 hours; 21 (4.1) over 32 hours; and 19 (3.8) over 56 hours. The estimated differences versus dexketoprofen 25mg and tramadol 100mg were respectively 10 (0.7) and 7.6 (0.7) over 24 hours; 9.8 (0.6) and 7.2 (0.6) over 32 hours; and 8.1 (0.5) and 6.3 (0.5) over 56 hours (p<0.0001 for all comparisons), which confirmed the superiority of the combination versus both single agents throughout the periods analysed. This significant higher decrease of PI favouring dexketoprofen/tramadol 25mg/75mg over dexketoprofen 25mg and tramadol 100mg, all given every 8 hours, during the first 56 hours post dose confirmed the superior analgesia shown after the first 0–8h post-dose period. The combination of dexketoprofen/tramadol 25mg/75mg is able to provide a level of analgesia above that achievable by each component alone, with a sustained effect when used as a multiple-dose regimen. The addition of this new combo to the analgesic armamentarium may contribute to facilitate early mobilization after surgery, thus positively impacting perioperative co-morbidities and length of in-hospital stay

Aims

We aimed to investigate if the use of the largest possible cobalt-chromium head articulating with polyethylene acetabular inserts would increase the in vivo wear rate in total hip arthroplasty.

Intervention is rare following minimally displaced radial head fractures or positive elbow ‘fat pad’ signs. A pilot study (n=20) found no patient required active treatment after discharge following their first fracture clinic visit. We therefore initiated routine discharge from A&E with an advice sheet, and an ‘open-door policy’ if patients failed to progress. 51 patients were managed by A&E according to this protocol over a six-month period. A standardised assessment of symptoms, satisfaction and functional limitation was completed for 24 patients by phone; average time to follow-up 4.2 months (range 2–9 months). Fourteen (58.4%) reported no pain. The 10 patients (41.6%) with on-going pain reported a median visual analogue score (VAS 0–10) of 0.7 (0–4) at rest, 0.25 (0–4) at night, 3.0 (0–10) carrying heavy objects and 2.75 (0–10) during repetitive movement. 4 of 24 (16.7%) reported minor functional impairment. 3 of 24 (12.5%) patients requested orthopaedic review, but all were satisfied with outcome, seeking reassurance and discharged without any intervention. 3 of 24 (12.5%) were unhappy with their progress, but all had suffered from chronic pain or psychological conditions predating their injury. When offered further review, none of these patients accepted. 22 (91%) were satisfied with their treatment and 23 (95.8%) returned to work and hobbies. This data suggests routine discharge from A&E with advice does not compromise care, as no intervention is usually required beyond advice. These findings have obvious positive clinical and financial implications in streamlining clinical workload

Introduction. The STarT Back trial demonstrated that targeting back pain treatment according to patient prognosis (low, medium or high-risk subgroups) is effective. However, the mechanisms leading to these improved treatment outcomes remain unknown. This study aimed to identify which psychological variables included in the study were mediating treatment outcome for all patients and within the low, medium and high-risk subgroups. Methods. Secondary analysis was conducted on 466 patients randomised to the active treatment arm with 4-month follow-up available. Psychological variables included depression (HADs), fear (TSK), catastrophising (PCS), bothersomeness and illness perception constructs (IPQ brief) e.g. personal control. Treatment outcome was characterised using change in disability score (RMDQ) at 4-months. Residualised change scores were calculated for each variable and Pearson's correlations were calculated overall and at the subgroup level to determine potential mediating variables for disability improvement. Results. Overall, correlations with RMDQ change were .62 for change in bothersomeness, .56 for change in catastrophising, .51 for change in fear, .48 for change in anxiety, .58 for change in depression, −.32 for change in personal control and .40 for change in symptom identity. The strength of correlation generally increased from low to high-risk subgroups, e.g. bothersomeness (low=.54, high=.70). However, the predominant variables mediating treatment outcome were common across risk-groups. Conclusion. The psychological variables which were highly correlated with improvements in disability were bothersomeness, depression and catastrophising. This finding was consistent across low, medium and high-risk subgroups. This study is ongoing and further mediation analysis using structural equation modelling is in progress. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. NIHR Spinal Pain Programme grant

AO Spine Reference Centre & Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition with no curative therapy. Pro-inflammatory therapy has been suggested recently to try and reduce the inhibitory glial scar and promote neural regeneration and healing. The aim of this study is to investigate the potential of sustained delivery of angiogenic/pro-inflammatory growth factors to reduce the secondary degeneration after spinal cord injury. Adult male Wistar Kyoto rats (200-300g; 12-16weeks old) were subjected to cord hemisections via a T10 laminectomy. Animals were randomised to treatment or control groups after the spinal cord injury had been induced. Treatment consisted of implantation of a mini-osmotic pump capable of delivering 5 micrograms vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and 5 micrograms platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), via a catheter, to the site of the lesion, over 7 days(n=6). Control animals were subjected to either cord lesion only (n=6) or lesion plus mini-pump delivering PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) solution (n=6). Rats were sacrificed at one month and the spinal cords were harvested and examined by immunohistology, using anti-neurofilament-200 and anti-Glial Acidic Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) antibodies. RESULTS: Active treatment spinal cords showed a higher level with aboration of the axonal filament through the defect and more dense neurofilament-200 staining at the lesion site compared to both control groups. The treatment also showed the elevated presence of activated microglia in the lesion, whilst distal to the lesion the microglia and astrocytes retained an unreactive phenotype. Pro-inflammatory therapy in the rat spinal cord-injury model showed favourable histological findings after sustained delivery of PDGF and VEGF

We have conducted a prospective trial of the management of 135 adult patients who had sustained soft-tissue injuries of the neck in vehicle accidents. Early traction and physiotherapy was compared with rest in a collar and unsupervised mobilisation. No benefit from the active treatment could be identified; moulded collars in slight flexion gave the best pain relief and are recommended

BACKGROUND CONTEXT. Osteoporosis causes decreased bone mineral density, which predisposes to fragility fractures. Low-energy vertebral compression fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fragility fracture. Prior studies have shown that only one-quarter of patients diagnosed with an osteoporotic fracture are referred or treated for osteoporosis. PURPOSE. To identify the rate of recurrent fractures after vertebroplasty and after the conservative treatment for patients aged 50 years and older who sustained low impact vertebral compressions fractures over a 6-month period. STUDY DESIGNED/SETTING. Prospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE. The sample included patients 50 years or older who had a low-energy vertebral compression fracture. The patients were divided into two groups: first group (n=24) - patients teated by vertebroplasty and the second group (n=34) - patients treated conservatory. There was no significant difference among the groups in terms of the vertebral levels or BMD. METHODS. Patients records were reviewed for fracture recurrence and in the same time we examined medical records for osteoporotic medication prescriptions, refferals to endocrinology and to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans. RESULTS. Confounding factors of age at the procedure, sex and chronic steroids use were considered and found to have no statistically significant difference between the two groups and between those with fracture recurrence and those without fracture recurrence. Four vertebroplasty procedure resulted in a recurrent fracture within the first 6 months. In the patient group treated conservatory 8 patients sustained recurrent fractures. Patients with recurrent vertebral fracture didn't receive active osteoporosis treatment. Within 6 months after the fracture only 21% of patients were receiving active osteoporosis treatment. CONCLUSIONS. The incidence of recurrent fracture after vertebroplasty or after conservative treatment is substantial but have no statistically significant difference between the two groups. We consider that the recurrence rate is not related with the surgical intervention but is the result of natural history of the patient's osteoporosis because the patients do not understand the importance of initiating active therapeutic intervention for osteoporosis recommended by physicians

Eighty-four children suffering from Perthes' disease are reviewed. The policy of management for these patients was one by which 55 per cent of the cases had no active treatment and the remainder were treated by operation. Results of the series show an improvement over a previously reported series of untreated controls, particularly where clinical management had been possible throughout the disease process. The importance of early definitive treatment for Group 4 cases is stressed. It is concluded that in the early stages where "head-at-risk" signs are not present, treatment may be conservative. Should these signs develop later the long-term result is not prejudiced if operative treatment is undertaken promptly

Purpose: A significant proportion of spine fusion operations may result in a non-union. Electromagnetic stimulation is a non-invasive method used to promote spine fusion although the efficacy of its use in this regard remains uncertain. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of electromagnetic stimulation on spine fusion. Method: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched from database inception to July 2009 for randomized controlled trials of electrical stimulation and spinal fusion. In addition, we performed a hand search of four relevant journals from January 2000 to July 2009, the on-line proceedings of the North American Spine Society Annual Meeting from 2002 to 2008 and bibliographies of eligible trials. Trials randomizing adult patients undergoing any type of spine fusion to active treatment with direct current, capacitance coupled or pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation or placebo and reporting on fusion rates were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data regarding clinical outcomes, stimulation device, treatment regimen and methodologic quality. Results: Of 1650 studies identified seven met the inclusion criteria. Electromagnetic stimulation in lumbar spine fusion was evaluated in five studies and two addressed cervical spine fusions. The use of electromagnetic stimulation in lumbar spine fusion resulted in a significant decrease in the risk of non-union (relative risk 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.93, p = 0.02, I2 = 57%). The observed reduction in risk of nonunion with electromagnetic stimulation was not affected by smoking or the number of levels fused. Due to limited and conflicting trials, similar effects were not observed in the two studies evaluating cervical spine fusion rates (relative risk 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 2.53, p = 0.77, I2 = 56%). Conclusion: Pooled analysis shows a 40% reduction in the risk of non-union of lumbar spine fusions with the use of electromagnetic stimulation although a similar effect was not observed for fusions of the cervical spine. However, due to study heterogeneity the current indications for the use of electrical stimulation in spine fusion remain somewhat unclear

Background: In studies using MRI to describe disc changes over time, herniations have been reported to reduce in 35–100% of cases. The aim of this study was to describe the development of disc related MRI-findings in patients with sciatica treated conservatively using a validated evaluation protocol. Methods: Included in this prospective intervention study were; 181 patients with radicular pain below the knee, leg pain ≥ 3, duration of leg pain between 2 and 52 weeks. The patients were randomized into one of two active conservative treatment regimes lasting eight weeks. All included patients were scanned at baseline and again at 14 months follow-up. MRI evaluation was performed, using a validated evaluation protocol. Results: In 139 (90%) of 154 patients included (median age 46 years) was it possible to identify a symptomatic disc level: 33 bulging discs, 52 focal protrusions, 10 broad-based protrusions, 36 extrusions, and 8 sequestrations. Three percent of bulges and 38% of focal protrusions improved, whereas 75 – 100% of the more substantial herniations, i.e. broad-based, extrusions, and sequestrations improved (p< 0.0001). Improvement over time for nerve root compromise was seen in 60% of the cases. Disc signal, disc height, and HIZ remained unchanged in 63–73%. Treatment and age groups did not show any differences. However, gender differences were found in relation to baseline findings and development over time. Conclusion: In general, symptomatic discs showed good MRI-prognosis, especially for those extruded. This study implies that active conservative treatment does not interfere with disc morphology as seen on MRI

We treated 36 patients with unilateral facet dislocations or fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine at the Mayo Clinic between 1975 and 1986. Adequate records were available for 34: ten patients were treated by open reduction and posterior fusion, and 24 by nonoperative management. Of these, 19 had halo traction followed by halo-thoracic immobilisation, four had a simple cervicothoracic orthosis, and one received no active treatment. Anatomical reduction was achieved more frequently in the operative group (60% compared with 25%). Nonoperative treatment was more likely to result in cervical translation on flexion/extension lateral radiographs, and in significant symptoms. Only 36% of the patients treated by halo traction achieved anatomical alignment; in 25% halo traction failed to achieve or maintain any degree of reduction. During halo-thoracic immobilisation, half of the patients lost some degree of reduction and patient satisfaction with the appliance was low. Open reduction and internal fixation of unilateral facet injuries gave better results. 6

Introduction: After total hip replacement (THR), thromboprophylaxis for at least 10 days and for up to 35 days is recommended – yet a convenient, oral anticoagulant is not currently available. Rivaroxaban – a once-daily, oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor with a predictable clinical profile – is in advanced clinical development. RECORD1, a multinational, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III study, compared once-daily oral rivaroxaban with subcutaneous enoxaparin for 5 weeks following THR. Methods: In total, 4541 patients were randomized to receive oral rivaroxaban 10 mg (6–8 hours after surgery and once daily thereafter), or 40 mg enoxaparin (administered subcutaneously the evening before surgery, resumed 6–8 hours after surgery, and continued once daily). Thromboprophylaxis was administered for 35±4 days; mandatory, bilateral venography was conducted the next day. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of any deep vein thrombosis (DVT), nonfatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and all-cause mortality. Safety endpoints included major and non-major bleeding during the active treatment period. Results: The incidence of the composite of DVT, PE, and all-cause mortality was significantly lower for rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin (1.1% vs 3.7%, respectively; p< 0.001; relative risk reduction [RRR] 70%). The incidence of major VTE was also significantly lower for rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin (0.2% vs 2.0%, respectively; p< 0.001; RRR 88%). There were no significant differences in the incidence of major bleeding (0.3% vs 0.1%; p=0.178) or non-major bleeding (5.8% vs 5.8%; p=1.000) between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin, respectively. There was no evidence of cardiac or liver safety issues. Conclusions: Following THR, thromboprophylaxis with once-daily, oral rivaroxaban was shown to be significantly more effective than subcutaneous, once-daily enoxaparin – without an increased risk of bleeding. This trial demonstrates the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban using a fixed, unmonitored, once-daily dose for extended thromboprophylaxis after THR

We report a series of 15 children, six male and nine female, of average age 20 months, seen at a paediatric orthopaedic clinic with torticollis. Orthopaedic examination revealed a normal range of neck movement in all cases but in seven there was palpable tightness in the absence of true shortening or contracture of the sternomastoid muscle. The patients were prospectively referred for ocular examination. In five of the 15 an ocular cause for the torticollis was detected with underaction of the superior oblique muscle in three, paresis of the lateral rectus muscle in one and nystagmus in one. Another two patients were found to have an abnormal ocular examination which was thought to be unrelated to their torticollis. Three of the patients with ocular torticollis required extra-ocular muscle surgery to abolish the head tilt and one of these had a tight sternomastoid muscle. Two of the non-ocular group had surgical release of the sternomastoid muscle; in the rest, the condition either resolved with physiotherapy or required no active treatment. We recommend that all patients with torticollis and no clear orthopaedic cause are referred for ocular assessment since it is not possible clinically to distinguish ocular from non-ocular causes

Aims

The purpose of this study was to identify the changes in untreated long head of the biceps brachii tendon (LHBT) after a rotator cuff tear and to evaluate the factors related to the changes.

Purpose: Thromboprophylaxis is recommended for at least 10 days and up to 35 days following total hip replacement (THR). Rivaroxaban is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in advanced clinical development that showed promise in early clinical trials. The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban with subcutaneous enoxaparin for 5 weeks, to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing primary THR. Method: Patients received 10 mg rivaroxaban orally 6–8 hours after surgery and once daily thereafter, or 40 mg enoxaparin subcutaneously the evening before surgery (restarting 6–8 hours after surgery), and continued once daily. Thromboprophylaxis was administered for 35±4 days, and mandatory, bilateral venography was conducted the next day. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of any deep vein thrombosis (DVT), non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and all-cause mortality. The primary efficacy analysis was a test for non-inferiority, followed by a test for superiority. Safety endpoints included major and non-major bleeding during the active treatment period. Results: A total of 4541 patients were randomized to receive rivaroxaban or enoxaparin. Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the incidence of the composite of DVT, PE, and all-cause mortality compared with enoxaparin (1.1% vs 3.7%, respectively; p< 0.001; relative risk reduction [RRR] 70%). Rivaroxaban also significantly reduced the incidence of major VTE compared with enoxaparin (0.2% vs 2.0%, respectively; p< 0.001; RRR 88%). There were no significant differences in the incidence of major bleeding (0.3% vs 0.1%; p=0.178) or non-major bleeding (5.8% vs 5.8%; p=1.000) between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin, respectively. There was no evidence of cardiac or liver safety issues. Conclusion: Oral, once-daily rivaroxaban was significantly more effective than subcutaneous, once-daily enoxaparin for extended thromboprophylaxis following THR. Rivaroxaban was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding and had a similar safety profile to enoxaparin. This trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of a fixed, unmonitored dose of an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor – rivaroxaban – for extended thromboprophylaxis after THR

Introduction: Four randomized, double-blind, phase III studies (RECORD1–4) investigated the oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after major orthopaedic surgery. Patients (N=12,729) were randomized to receive oral rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily or subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily (RECORD1–3), or 30 mg twice daily (RECORD4). In RECORD1 and 2, patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty received rivaroxaban for 31–39 days. Enoxaparin was given for 31–39 days in RECORD1, 10–14 days followed by placebo in RECORD2. In RECORD3 and 4, patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty received prophylaxis for 10–14 days. After prophylaxis, all patients were followed up for a further 30–35 days. Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the incidence of the primary efficacy outcome for the individual studies (total VTE; composite of any deep vein thrombosis, non-fatal pulmonary embolism [PE] and all-cause mortality) compared with the enoxaparin regimens, with similar rates of major bleeding. Methods: A pre-specified pooled analysis of all four trials was performed on all randomized patients who received at least one dose of double-blind study medication to evaluate the effect of rivaroxaban on the composite of symptomatic VTE and all-cause mortality (primary outcome for pooled analysis), and bleeding. This outcome was analysed at day 12±2 in the active treatment pool (enoxaparin-controlled in all studies) and in the total study duration pool (including follow-up after treatment). Results: Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the incidence vs enoxaparin of the composite of symptomatic VTE and death (day 12±2: 0.47% vs 0.97%, respectively, p=0.001; total study duration: 0.81% vs 1.6%, respectively, p< 0.001) and the composite of PE and death (day 12±2: 0.19% vs 0.39%, respectively, p=0.049; total study duration: 0.47% vs 0.76%, respectively, p=0.039). The rates of major bleeding with the rivaroxaban and enoxaparin regimens were 0.34% and 0.21%, respectively, p=0.175 at day 12±2 and at total study duration were 0.44% and 0.27%, respectively, p=0.135. Rivaroxaban also reduced the composite of death, infarction, stroke, symptomatic VTE and major bleeding vs enoxaparin (total study duration: 1.6% vs 2.2%, respectively, p=0.006). Conclusion: Rivaroxaban reduced the composites of major clinical outcomes compared with enoxaparin regimens, with similar rates of major bleeding, in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery

i Background and purpose Although there are now many trials of the effectiveness of back pain treatments, there are few robust cost effectiveness analyses of these treatments. ii Methods and Results: We analysed the cost-effectiveness of adding to ‘best care’ in general practice for patients consulting with low back pain: spinal manipulation; exercise classes; or manipulation followed by exercise (‘combined treatment’) alongside the UK BEAM trial. We collected health care resource use and health-related quality of life data at baseline, 3 and 12 months from 1334 trial participants. We estimated participant-specific quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs over the 12 months study period. Over one year mean treatment costs relative to ‘best care’ were: £195 (95% credibility interval £85 to £308) for manipulation; £140 (£3 to £278) for exercise; and £125 (£21 to £228) for combined treatment. All three active treatments increased participants’ average QALYs compared with ‘best care’ alone. For each extra QALY that combined treatment yielded relative to ‘best care’, it cost £3,800; in economic terms it had an ‘incremental cost-effectiveness ratio’ (ICER) of £3,800. Manipulation alone had an ICER of £8,700 relative to combined treatment. If the NHS were prepared to pay at least £10,000 for each extra QALY (lower than previous recommendations in the UK), manipulation alone would probably be the best strategy. If manipulation were not available, exercise would have an ICER of £8,300 relative to ‘best care’. iii Conclusions The UK BEAM spinal manipulation package is a cost-effective addition to ‘best care’ for back pain in general practice

Aims: In orthopedic surgery, the optimal duration of thromboprophylaxis is debated, and very few data are available in hip fracture. We addressed these issues in 5 randomized double-blind clinical trials of fondaparinux. Methods: In four studies in 7344 orthopedic surgery patients, fondaparinux was administered up to 11 days and compared to approved enoxaparin regimens. In the PENTHIFRA-Plus study in 656 hip fracture surgery patients, after an initial treatment with fondaparinux for 7±1 days, patients were randomized to fondaparinux or placebo for additional 21±2 days. In all trials, primary efficacy was venous thromboembolism (VTE), at the end of the treatment period. Results: In the four 11-day prophylaxis studies, fondaparinux reduced the incidence of VTE from 13.7% with enoxaparin to 6.8% (risk reduction [RR]: 55.2%; P< 0.001). Fondaparinux efficacy was significantly influenced by treatment duration (P< 0.001): for instance, the incidence of VTE was lower in patients treated for 9 to11 days (5.2%) than in patients treated for ≤5 days (8.7%, P= 0.038). In the PENTHIFRA-Plus study, the incidence of VTE up to 4 weeks was reduced to 1.4% compared with 35.0% with placebo (relative RR: 95.9%, P< 0.001). The incidence of symptomatic VTE was also significantly lower with fondaparinux (0.3%) than with placebo (2.7%, relative RR: 88.8%, P=0.021). Conclusions: Fondaparinux efficacy in preventing VTE in orthopedic surgery increased significantly with a longer duration of treatment. Hip fracture surgery patients are at high risk of VTE up to 4 weeks after surgery and treatment with fondaparinux for 4 weeks postoperatively provides greater benefit than active treatment for only 1 week

Background: The implications of clinical governance, changing epidemiology, financial restraints alongside the increasing demands of the informed consumer-patient mean we must continually adapt our practice to efficiently meet expectations. As a busy regional Trauma and Orthopaedics Unit of a District General Hospital we are increasingly affected by economic agendas and have noted an increase in the presenting frailty of our fracture hip patients. Our practice has already changed by the use of an Orthogeriatrics Team (OGT): optimising patient status pre-operatively and ensuring maximum post-operatively continuity. The OGT has significantly reduced time to theatre. With appropriate investigation and lower complication rates it will offset the cost of the team. We wanted to see if the care of fractured hip patients could be further focused. On this basis, a four-part clinical stratification system was devised for patients undergoing fractured hip repair:. Complex 0 (C0): Hip repair of a non-complex fracture pattern in an otherwise fit, healthy patient. Complex I (CI): A fit, healthy patient with a complex hip fracture pattern. Complex II (CII): Medically unfit patient with a non-complex hip fracture. Complex III (CIII): Medically unfit patient with a complex hip fracture. Patients and Methods: The first 50 patients operated on across the same three months in both 2004 and 2005 were retrospectively assessed from prospectively collected data. Patients were grouped accordingly and age, length of stay, time to theatre and reason for delay, mental state examination score (MSE) on admission, and number of co-morbidities were also recorded. Chi-square was performed on co-morbidity, MSE and theatre times with AVOVA used for age and length of stay data. Results: No significant difference between groups for age. Two fold increase in stay (2004 paired classes C0+I vs CII+III; P< 0.003). Chance of more than 2 co-morbidities (C0+I vs CII+III): 52% vs 96% (2004) and 56% vs 92% (2005). MSE with a positive dementia score: 26% vs 82% (2004; P0.001) and 39% vs 70% (2005; P< 0.05). Time delays to theatre greater than 24hrs were seen 24% vs 92% (P< 0.001) in 2005. The correlating values in 2004 were 63% vs 87%. Active treatment delaying theatre in the C0+I group 24% vs 57% (CII+III) in 2004 and 0% vs 78% 2005 (P< 0.001). Conclusion: The benefit of the OGT can be seen clearly in most parameters and this classification system correlates and quantifies increasing hip fracture complexity with increasing post-operative burden even under their care. Stratifying patients for pre- and postoperative planning, risk counselling, and surgeon selection can identify patient groups likely to incur greater cost during their treatment. The classifications are easily reproducible and can be applied to larger patient groups via institutional or national joint registries

Diabetic foot syndrome with osteomyelitis of metatarsal head show frequent recurrence and need a very long antibiotic treatment, often only to see the inflammation flare up once antibiotic are dismissed. We present our initial experience about 3 patients presenting a clinical and radiologically confirmed osteomyelitis of the metatarsal head. We treated them with limited resection of metatarsal head, microbiologic sample and filling of the remaining metatarsal canal by means of an absorbable antibiotic loaded bone graft substitute, packing an absorbable antibiotic sponge (Gentamycin) in place of the metatarsal head and direct skin closure. All patients had an orthesis avoiding fore-foot weight bearing during the first month, but allowing them to walk normally. Follow up took place on a weekly rhythm during the first month, every fortnight during the 2° month and after this once a month. Actually the follow up period extends from 4 – 7 months. None of the treated 3 patients did need any second look operation nor did they present any local complications. Due to the type of resorbable implant used, some oozing of transparent liquid during the first 4 weeks may present and is to be considered normal. This new method presents a valid alternative to the more classic “two step cement nail” procedure of active osteomyelitis treatment. We consider planing long term study and a multicenter randomized trial

Spasticity is a complex syndrome requiring extensive and complete treatment. Injections of botulinum toxin type A decrease muscle tone in spastic muscles of the hand and improve the use of the upper limb. However, rehabilitation and different non-invasive treatments should also be considered. Shock waves are defined as a sequence of single sonic pulses characterised by high peak pressure (100 MPa), fast pressure rise (< 10 ns) and short duration (10 μs). Twenty patients, with upper limb spasticity post stroke were enrolled in the study. The patients (12 men and eight women) had a mean age of 63 years (36–76 years). An electromagnetic coil lithotriptor (Modulith SLK® by Storz Medical AG) provided with in-line ultrasound, radiographic, and computerised aiming (Lithotrack® system) was used. Flexor muscles of the forearm were treated with 1500 shots, and 3200 shots were used for interosseous muscles of the hand (800 for each muscle). The energy applied was 0.030 mj/mm. The protocol consisted of one placebo treatment session in which no shock waves were applied, followed 1 week later by one active shock wave treatment session. The Ashworth Scale was used to study the muscle tone activity in patients. No changes in the Ashworth score were noted in hand and wrist flexion after placebo stimulation. After real treatment the hand muscles and finger flexion in particular showed a marked reduction in spasticity with a change in the Ashworth scale from 3 to 0. At 1, 4, and 12 weeks, a slight increase in muscle tone was observed for all subjects. Needle EMG was performed at 4 weeks. No denervation was observed. The main finding of this preliminary study is that a single active treatment of shock wave therapy in spastic muscles in a patient affected by stroke resulted in a significant reduction in muscle tone. In contrast, no effect was noted after placebo stimulation. Nitric oxide synthesis has been suggested to be one of the most important mechanisms to explain the effectiveness of shock waves in the treatment of different soft tissue diseases. Shock wave therapy appeared to be safe, non invasive and without complications. Our findings suggest that shock wave therapy may be useful in decreasing flexor tone and functional disability in patients with spasticity of the hand, with a long-lasting effect. This therapy could open a new field of research in the treatment of spasticity. Further studies with a larger group of patients are, therefore, necessary

Introduction: The Ponseti method has been adopted by many pediatric orthopaedic centers throughout Europe in the last years. The minimal invasive approach and the short duration of the active treatment phase have been the main reasons to change to the Ponseti method at our institution. We report the short term results of patients treated with the Ponseti method for idiopathic clubfeet and discuss experiences and pitfalls. Material and Methods: From the end of 2002 on we have applied the treatment regime strictly as described by Ponseti himself. For this study we analyzed a group of patients comprising all patients treated for congenital idiopathic clubfoot according to the Ponseti protocol within the first three weeks after births. The need for open release surgery was the main outcome measurement in this group. Results: Between December 2002 and July 2004 we treated a total of 59 clubfeet in 37 patients with the Ponseti method. Our patient population consisted of 14 female and 23 male patients. The mean Dimeglio score was 9.2 points (5–15 points). Using the Pirani score the mean midfoot score was 1.7 points (1–3 points), the mean hindfoot score was 2 points (0.5–3 points) and the mean total score was 3.8 points (2–6 points). Three feet in two patients were treated with Ponseti casting only (5 %) and did not need a percutaneous achilles tenotomy (pAT) or open release surgery. Fifty-two feet in 33 patients (88 %) were successfully treated with Ponseti casting and pAT. Four cases in two patients had to undergo a McKay Simons procedure (7 %). Thereby 93% of all cases were treated without open release surgery. Mean follow-up after the last cast was 7.4 months (3–16 months). A recurrence was seen in one patient representing two cases after about 8 months after pAT. The parents were non compliant with the abduction bar protocol and could not be convinced of the importance of the orthosis; a McKay Simons procedure was performed. No other cases of recurrence were observed during the follow up period. Discussion: The Ponseti method should be applied as originally described, and especially, if more people are involved in the treatment, a standard treatment regime is desirable. As the compliance of the parents is a crucial factor, everything should be done to ensure that the treatment is made as easy for them as possible. Only if a full support for questions or problems with the casts and especially with the braces is available, a good compliance can be ensured. The minimal invasive approach utilized by the percutaneous tenotomy is the lead argument in favor of the Ponseti method. In cases of recurrence or residual deformity when open surgery is necessary, this secondary procedure is in fact primary surgery. Thereby the danger of massive scaring associated with limited range of motion, pain and disability after a second procedures is prevented

Aims

The aim of this study was to examine the recent trend in delivery of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) in Scotland and to determine if this varies by geographical location.

Purpose: Parent worry about torsional or angular anomalies of the lower limbs of their children is widespread. The relationship between a child’s postural habits and torsional anomalies of the lower limbs is often mentioned in the literature despite the lack of a single study demonstrating solid evidence. Active treatment of such anomalies is exceptionally necessary. Postural education is undoubtedly provided by parents. The purpose of this study was not to establish a cause and effect relationship between postural habits and torsional anomalies but rather to determine whether children who exhibit a preferential nocturnal and diurnal posture have torsional anomalies of the lower limbs. Material and methods: This retrospective analysis included all patients consulting one paediatric orthopaedist for in-toeing during a period of six years. Patients with a neurological disorder, bone and joint disease, or a congenital malformation as well as those with a history of orthesis use for fracture or surgery of the lower limbs were excluded. The cohort was composed of 463 children aged 1.5 to 15 years. Five habitual postures were studied: sitting cross-legged, sitting on knees feet under the buttocks, laying on knees with buttocks upward and feet inward, laying on belly knees extended and feet inward, and indifferent sitting and reclining positions. Abnormal torsion was determined clinically. Internal hip rotation greater than 70 (Staheli) observed in the ventral decubitus position with knees flexed 90° was considered to indicate excessive femoral anteversion (EFAV). Internal tibial torsion (ITT) was considered to be present when the thigh-foot angle was 0 measured in the ventral decubitus position or sitting on the table legs hanging. We searched for correlations between habitual posture and abnormal torsion as well as the influence of gender and age using the chi-square test and 95% confidence intervals. Patients with both EFAV and ITT were stratified by group using the Woolf method associated with the Mantel-Haenszel test. Results: Abnormal torsion was found more often in children aged less than 4 years with no difference between boys and girls. Among the children in this study presenting in-toeing, 31% did not have a preferred sitting or reclining position and only 7% presented clearly abnormal torsion. There was a significant direct correlation between EFAV and sitting crosslegged and a significant inverse correlation between EFAV and the other habitual postures. Conversely, there was no significant correlation between ITT and the habitual postures studied. Discussion and conclusion: This study provided objective information concerning widely accepted but poorly documented notions. There were two limitations: 1) the lack of a control group not presenting in-toeing, 2) the absence of precise goniometric measurements, a problem encountered in most studies using clinical methods. Although the presence of abnormal torsion of the lower limb appears to significantly influence the gait pattern in children, it does not appear to affect habitual postures. A significant relationship was found only between habitual posture and EFAV, and not ITT. These results should be taken into consideration when planning treatment

Aims

The aim of this study was to analyze the complications and outcomes of treatment in a series of previously untreated patients with a primary aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) who had been treated by percutaneous sclerosant therapy using polidocanol.

Purpose: Currently, there is limited research on the effectiveness of rehabilitative exercises for neck pain patients generally, and chronic neck pain patients in particular. Interestingly, recent evidence suggests that dysfunction of cervicocephalic kinaesthesia, as measured by head repositioning accuracy (HRA), is present in many chronic patients, and that active eye-head-neck co-ordination exercises may be useful in terms of patients’ rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was twofold: i) to determine if there was a difference in HRA in chronic neck pain subjects versus controls; ii) to assess the effect of a rehabilitative exercise programme on chronic neck pain subjects’ HRA and reported levels of pain. Method: A prospective, intervention study on a convenience sample of chronic neck pain subjects (> 3 months duration) versus age- and gender-matched, asymptomatic control subjects was conducted. Exclusion criteria included any form of active treatment (> 1 per month) for musculoskeletal complaints, including medication, as well as any arthritic, orthopaedic, or neurological disorder. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects were assigned, via stratified, random allocation, to either a rehabilitative exercise or non-exercise group. This gave rise to 4 groups. Symptomatic and asymptomatic exercise subjects were given a training session as well as written and verbal instructions on how to perform the eye-head-neck co-ordination exercises. Subjects were asked to perform the exercises twice daily over a 4-week period, and to keep a diary of exercise compliance and any associated symptomatology. Outcomes included HRA for all active cervical range-of-motion, measured by a helmet-mounted laser pointer on a paper target, and pain intensity as measured by a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Outcomes were measured in all subjects at baseline, end of week 2, and end of week 4. Results: 63 subjects were recruited, of which 56 completed the 4-week study. 28 chronic neck pain subjects (14 males and 14 females; mean age 22.6 years, range 19–30 years), and 28 asymptomatic controls (14 males and 14 females; mean age 23.9 years, range 19–31 years) were assigned via stratified random allocation, to an exercise or non-exercise group. Each of the 4 groups contained 14 subjects. Active HRA was found to be significantly reduced in neck pain subjects compared to control subjects (ANOVA, p< 0.001). Whiplash patients (N=17) in particular, were significantly less precise (ANOVA, p< 0.001). A significant reduction in reported pain was experienced by the symptomatic exercise versus symptomatic non-exercise group (ANOVA, p< 0.001). At 4-weeks, the symptomatic exercise group demonstrated significantly improved HRA in all active movements compared to the other groups (ANOVA, p< 0.001). Conclusions: This study provides evidence that simple, eye-head-neck co-ordination exercises may be helpful in reducing functional impairment in terms of cervicocephalic kinaesthesia as well as reported levels of pain in chronic neck pain subjects

Aims

Complex displaced osteoporotic acetabular fractures in the elderly are associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality. Surgical options include either open reduction and internal fixation alone, or combined with total hip arthroplasty (THA). There remains a cohort of severely comorbid patients who are deemed unfit for extensive surgical reconstruction and are treated conservatively. We describe the results of a coned hemipelvis reconstruction and THA inserted via a posterior approach to the hip as the primary treatment for this severely high-risk cohort.