Aims. There is evidence that morbidly obese patients have more intra- and postoperative complications and poorer outcomes when undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the direct anterior approach (DAA). The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of DAA for THA, and compare the complications and outcomes of morbidly obese patients with nonobese patients. Methods. Morbidly obese patients (n = 86), with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. who underwent DAA THA at our institution between September 2010 and December 2017, were matched to 172 patients with BMI < 30 kg/m. 2. Data regarding demographics, set-up and operating time, blood loss, radiological assessment, Harris Hip Score (HHS), International Hip Outcome Tool (12-items), reoperation rate, and complications at two years postoperatively were retrospectively analyzed. Results. No significant differences in blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, or implant position were observed between the two groups. Superficial wound infection rate was higher in the obese group (8.1%) compared to the nonobese group (1.2%) (p = 0.007) and relative risk of reoperation was 2.59 (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 9.91). One periprosthetic joint infection was reported in the obese group. Set-up time in the operating table and mean operating time were higher in morbidly obese patients. Functional outcomes and patient-related outcome measurements were superior in the obese group (mean increase of HHS was 52.19 (SD 5.95) vs 45.1 (SD 4.42); p < 0.001), and mean increase of International Hip Outcome Tool (12-items) was 56.8 (SD 8.88) versus 55.2 (SD 5.85); p = 0.041). Conclusion. Our results suggest that THA in morbidly obese patients can be safely and effectively performed via the DAA by experienced surgeons. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(1):4–11

Aims. The aim of this study was to observe the implications of withholding total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in morbidly obese patients. Patients and Methods. A total of 289 morbidly obese patients with end-stage osteoarthritis were prospectively followed. There were 218 women and 71 men, with a mean age of 56.3 years (26.7 to 79.1). At initial visit, patients were given information about the risks of TJA in the morbidly obese and were given referral information to a bariatric clinic. Patients were contacted at six, 12, 18, and 24 months from initial visit. Results. The median body mass index (BMI) at initial visit was 46.9 kg/m. 2. (interquartile range (IQR) 44.6 to 51.3). A total of 82 patients (28.4%) refused to follow-up or answer phone surveys, and 149 of the remaining 207 (72.0%) did not have surgery. Initial median BMI of those 149 was 47.5 kg/m. 2. (IQR 44.6 to 52.5) and at last follow-up was 46.7 kg/m. 2. (IQR 43.4 to 51.2). Only 67 patients (23.2%) went to the bariatric clinic, of whom 14 (20.9%) had bariatric surgery. A total of 58 patients (20.1%) underwent TJA. For those 58, BMI at initial visit was 45.3 kg/m. 2. (IQR 43.7 to 47.2), and at surgery was 42.3 kg/m. 2. (IQR 38.1 to 46.5). Only 23 patients (39.7%) of those who had TJA successfully achieved BMI < 40 kg/m. 2. at surgery. Conclusion. Restricting TJA for morbidly obese patients does not incentivize weight loss prior to arthroplasty. Only 20.1% of patients ultimately underwent TJA and the majority of those remained morbidly obese. Better resources and coordinated care are required to optimize patients prior to surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):28–32

Aims. The purpose of this study was to assess total knee arthroplasty (TKA) volume and rates of early complications in morbidly obese patients over the last decade, where the introduction of quality models influencing perioperative care pathways occurred. Methods. Patients undergoing TKA between 2011 to 2018 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were stratified by BMI < 40 kg/m. 2. and ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. and evaluated by the number of cases per year. The 30-day rates of any complication, wound complications, readmissions, and reoperation were assessed. Trends in these endpoints over the study period were compared between groups using odds ratios (ORs) and multivariate analyses. Results. In total, 314,695 patients underwent TKA and 46,362 (15%) had BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. The prevalence of morbid obesity among TKA patients did not change greatly, ranging between 14% and 16%. Reoperation rate decreased from 1.16% to 0.96% (odds ratio (OR) 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.99)) for patients with BMI < 40 kg/m. 2. , as did rates of readmission (4.46% to 2.87%; OR 0.61 (0.55 to 0.69)). Patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. also had fewer readmissions over the study period (4.87% to 3.34%; OR 0.64 (0.49 to 0.83)); however, the rate of reoperation did not change (1.37% to 1.41%; OR 0.99 (0.62 to 1.56)). Significant improvements were not observed for infective complications over time for either group; patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. had increased risk of both deep infection and wound complications compared to non-morbidly obese patients. Rate of any complication decreased for all patients. Conclusion. The proportion of TKAs in morbidly obese patients has not significantly changed over the past decade. Although readmission rates improved for all patients, reductions in reoperation in non-morbidly obese patients were not experienced by the morbidly obese, resulting in a widening of the complication gap between these cohorts. Care improvements have not lowered the differential risk of infective complications in the morbidly obese. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):38–44

Aims. We studied the outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasties in a high-volume arthroplasty centre to determine if patients with morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. ) had unacceptably worse outcomes as compared to those with BMI < 40 kg/m. 2. . Methods. In a two-year period, 4,711 patients had either total hip arthroplasty (THA; n = 2,370), total knee arthroplasty (TKA; n = 2,109), or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA; n = 232). Of these patients, 392 (8.3%) had morbid obesity. We compared duration of operation, anaesthetic time, length of stay (LOS), LOS > three days, out of hours attendance, emergency department attendance, readmission to hospital, return to theatre, and venous thromboembolism up to 90 days. Readmission for wound infection was recorded to one year. Oxford scores were recorded preoperatively and at one year postoperatively. Results. On average, the morbidly obese had longer operating times (63 vs 58 minutes), longer anaesthetic times (31 vs 28 minutes), increased LOS (3.7 vs 3.5 days), and significantly more readmissions for wound infection (1.0% vs 0.3%). There were no statistically significant differences in either suspected or confirmed venous thromboembolism. Improvement in Oxford scores were equivalent. Conclusion. Although morbidly obese patients had less favourable outcomes, we do not feel that the magnitude of difference is clinically significant when applied to an individual, particularly when improvement in Oxford scores were unrelated to BMI. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):515–521

Aims. It has been shown that the preoperative modification of risk factors associated with obesity may reduce complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal method of doing so remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a preoperative Risk Stratification Tool (RST) devised in our institution could reduce unexpected intensive care unit (ICU) transfers and 90-day emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and reoperations after TKA in obese patients. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 1,614 consecutive patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA. Their mean age was 65.1 years (17.9 to 87.7) and the mean BMI was 34.2 kg/m. 2. (SD 7.7). All patients underwent perioperative optimization and monitoring using the RST, which is a validated calculation tool that provides a recommendation for postoperative ICU care or increased nursing support. Patients were divided into three groups: non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m. 2. , n = 512); obese (BMI 30 kg/m. 2. to 39.9 kg/m. 2. , n = 748); and morbidly obese (BMI > 40 kg/m. 2. , n = 354). Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the outcomes among the groups adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and diabetes. Results. Obese patients had a significantly increased rate of discharge to a rehabilitation facility compared with non-obese patients (38.7% (426/1,102) vs 26.0% (133/512), respectively; p < 0.001). When stratified by BMI, discharge to a rehabilitation facility remained significantly higher compared with non-obese (26.0% (133)) in both obese (34.2% (256), odds ratio (OR) 1.6) and morbidly obese (48.0% (170), OR 3.1) patients (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in unexpected ICU transfer (0.4% (two) non-obese vs 0.9% (seven) obese (OR 2.5) vs 1.7% (six) morbidly obese (OR 5.4); p = 0.054), visits to the ED (8.6% (44) vs 10.3% (77) (OR 1.3) vs 10.5% (37) (OR 1.2); p = 0.379), readmissions (4.5% (23) vs 4.0% (30) (OR 1.0) vs 5.1% (18) (OR 1.4); p = 0.322), or reoperations (2.5% (13) vs 3.3% (25) (OR 1.2) vs 3.1% (11) (OR 0.9); p = 0.939). Conclusion. With the use of a preoperative RST, morbidly obese patients had similar rates of short-term postoperative adverse outcomes after primary TKA as non-obese patients. This supports the assertion that morbidly obese patients can safely undergo TKA with appropriate perioperative optimization and monitoring. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):45–50

We compared 55 consecutive total hip replacements performed on 53 morbidly obese patients with osteoarthritis with a matched group of 55 total hip replacements in 53 non-obese patients. The groups were matched for age, gender, prosthesis type, laterality and preoperative Harris Hip Score. They were followed prospectively for five years and the outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score, the Short-form 36 score and radiological findings. Survival at five years using revision surgery as an endpoint, was 90.9% (95% confidence interval 82.9 to 98.9) for the morbidly obese and 100% for the non-obese patients. The Harris Hip and the Short-form 36 scores were significantly better in the non-obese group (p < 0.001). The morbidly obese patients had a higher rate of complications (22% vs 5%, p = 0.012), which included dislocation and both superficial and deep infection. In light of these inferior results, morbidly obese patients should be advised to lose weight before undergoing a total hip replacement, and counselled regarding the complications. Despite these poorer results, however, the patients have improved function and quality of life

We evaluated the outcome of primary total hip replacement (THR) in 3290 patients with the primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis at a minimum follow-up of two years. They were stratified into categories of body mass index (BMI) based on the World Health Organisation classification of obesity. Statistical analysis was carried out to determine if there was a difference in the post-operative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, the Harris hip score and the Short-Form-12 outcome based on the BMI. While the pre- and post-operative scores were lower for the group classified as morbidly obese, the overall change in outcome scores suggested an equal if not greater improvement compared with the non-morbidly obese patients. The overall survivorship and rate of complications were similar in the BMI groups although there was a slightly higher rate of revision for sepsis in the morbidly obese group. Morbid obesity does not affect the post-operative outcome after THR, with the possible exception of a marginally increased rate of infection. Therefore withholding surgery based on the BMI is not justified

The results of 41 consecutive total knee replacements performed on morbidly obese patients with a body mass index > 40 kg/m. 2. , were compared with a matched group of 41 similar procedures carried out in non-obese patients (body mass index < 30 kg/m. 2. ). The groups were matched for age, gender, diagnosis, type of prosthesis, laterality and pre-operative Knee Society Score. We prospectively followed up the patients for a mean of 38.5 months (6 to 66). No patients were lost to follow-up. At less than four years after operation, the results were worse in the morbidly obese group compared with the non-obese, as demonstrated by inferior Knee Society Scores (mean knee score 85.7 and 90.5 respectively, p = 0.08; mean function score 75.6 and 83.4, p = 0.01), a higher incidence of radiolucent lines on post-operative radiographs (29% and 7%, respectively, p = 0.02), a higher rate of complications (32% and 0%, respectively, p = 0.001) and inferior survivorship using revision and pain as end-points (72.3% and 97.6%, respectively, p = 0.02). Patients with a body mass index > 40 kg/m. 2. should be advised to lose weight prior to total knee replacement and to maintain weight reduction. They should also be counselled regarding the inferior results which may occur if they do not lose weight before surgery

Introduction. Morbid obesity (BMI>40) is a significant risk factor for complications following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). As such many have a restrictive practice of withholding elective primary TJA in the morbidly obese. The purpose of this study was to observe the implications of this practice. Methods. From 2012 to 2014, 289 patients with morbid obesity and end-stage OA of the hip or knee were prospectively followed. At initial visit, patients were given a packet on risks of TJA in the morbidly obese and referral information to a weight loss clinic. Patients were contacted at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months from initial visit for PROs, and BMI changes. The average age of patients was 56 (26.7–79.1) there were 218 females and 71 males. Results. The average BMI at initial visit was 46.9 (39.9–68.2). 85 patients (29%) refused additional follow up or to answer phone surveys regarding their status. 146 patients (50.5%) have not had surgery. Initial BMI in this cohort was 47.4 (39.9–68.6) and at last follow up was 46.8 (28.9–70.8). Of those, 11 (7.5%) had a last follow up BMI≤40. Only 23% of patients went to the bariatric clinic and 13% had bariatric surgery. Fifty-eight patients (20.1%) underwent TJA. BMI at initial visit was 45.3 (40.3–55.4), and at the time of surgery was 41.3 (27.5–69.5). Only 20 patients (6.9% of those followed) have successfully achieved BMI < 40 and had surgery. Of those, 14 (70%) had a last follow up BMI≤40, and 2 (10%) had a last follow up BMI≤30. Conclusions. The practice of restricting total joint replacement to morbidly obese patients does not serve as an incentive to lose weight prior to arthroplasty. Only 20% of patients ultimately underwent TJA and the majority of those remained morbidly obese. Better resources and collaborative care among specialties is required to optimize patients prior to surgery

Aims. Obesity is associated with an increased risk of hip osteoarthritis, resulting in an increased number of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed annually. This study examines the peri- and postoperative outcomes of morbidly obese (MO) patients (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. ) compared to healthy weight (HW) patients (BMI 18.5 to < 25 kg/m. 2. ) who underwent a THA using the anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) approach. Methods. This retrospective cohort study observes peri- and postoperative outcomes of MO and HW patients who underwent a primary, unilateral THA with the ABMS approach. Data from surgeries performed by three surgeons at a single institution was collected from January 2013 to August 2020 and analyzed using Microsoft Excel and Stata 17.0. Results. This study compares 341 MO to 1,140 HW patients. Anaesthesia, surgery duration, and length of hospital stay was significantly lower in HW patients compared to MO. There was no difference in incidence of pulmonary embolism, periprosthetic fracture, or dislocation between the two groups. The rate of infection in MO patients (1.47%) was significantly higher than HW patients (0.14%). Preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) show a significantly higher pain level in MO patients and a significantly lower score in functional abilities. Overall, six-week and one-year postoperative data show higher levels of pain, lower levels of functional improvement, and lower satisfaction scores in the MO group. Conclusion. The comorbidities of obesity are well studied; however, the implications of THA using the ABMS approach have not been studied. Our peri- and postoperative results demonstrate significant improvements in PROMs in MO patients undergoing THA. However, the incidence of deep infection was significantly higher in this group compared with HW patients. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(5):299–305

Morbid obesity and its association with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome have been increasingly recognised in children. Orthopaedic surgeons are often the primary medical contact for older children with tibia vara, which has long been associated with obesity, but are unfamiliar with the evaluation and treatment of sleep apnoea in children. We reviewed all children with tibia vara treated surgically at one of our institutions over a period of five years. Thirty-seven patients were identified; 18 were nine years of age or older and 13 of these (72%) had morbid obesity and a history of snoring. Eleven children were diagnosed as having sleep apnoea on polysomnography. The incidence of this syndrome in the 18 children aged nine years or older with tibia vara, was 61%. All these patients required pre-operative non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation; tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy were necessary in five (45%). No peri-operative complications related to the airway occurred. There is a high incidence of sleep apnoea in morbidly obese patients with tibia vara. These patients should be screened for snoring and, if present, should be further evaluated for sleep apnoea before corrective surgery is undertaken

Abstract. Aims. The association between body mass index (BMI) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is well studied, but remains unclear in the literature. We aimed to determine whether morbid obesity (BMI≥40) was associated with increased risk of VTE following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), compared to those of BMI<40. Methods. Between January 2016 and December 2020, our institution performed 4506 TKAs and 449 UKAs. 450 (9.1%) patients had a BMI≥40. CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) and ultrasound scan for suspected proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were recorded up to 90 days post-operatively. Results. When comparing those of BMI<40 to those with BMI≥40, there was no difference in incidence of PE (1.0% vs 1.1%, p=0.803) or proximal DVT (0.4% vs 0.2%, p=0.645). There was no difference in number of ultrasound scans ordered (p=0.668), or number of CTPAs ordered for those with a BMI≥40 (p=0.176). The percentage of patients with a confirmed PE or proximal DVT were 24.2% and 3.9% respectively in the BMI<40 group, compared to 20.0% (p=0.804) and 2.3% (p=0.598) in the BMI≥40 group. Conclusion. Morbid obesity was not associated with increased risk of PE or proximal DVT within 90 days of TKA or UKA. Overall, 76.3% of CTPAs and 96.2% of ultrasound scans were negative. Increasing the threshold for VTE investigation would reduce the rate of negative investigations. Establishing more effective risk stratification protocols, to guide investigation, would likely reduce unnecessary imaging

Introduction. Rapid recovery protocols after joint replacement have been implemented widely to decrease hospital length of stay (LOS). Minimally-invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS-TKA) may facilitate rapid recovery for patients. Increased complications and LOS have been documented in morbidly obese TKA patients. The objective of the current study was to retrospectively evaluate the impact of morbid obesity on MIS-TKA patients. Methods. We conducted a retrospective chart review on patients that underwent MISTKA at a high volume orthopedic center between August 2012 and September 2015 (N = 4173). All surgeries were performed by one of six fellowship trained surgeons utilizing the same implant. MISTKA was performed utilizing a mid-vastus approach under tourniquet. All patients experienced rapid recovery protocols utilizing multi-modal pain management pathways, same day physical therapy, and absence of CPM machines. We evaluated patient age, gender, operative time, LOS, and 90-day readmission for morbidly obese (BMI≥40; n = 597), and non-morbidly obese (BMI<40; n = 3576) patients. Statistical analysis was conducted using Minitab 16 Statistical Software. Results. Morbidly obese patients had significantly higher mean LOS (1.74 days) compared to non-morbidly obese patients (1.62 days, p=0.035), and significantly higher 90-day readmissions (12.45% and 6.65% respectively, p= 0.001). In patients over the age of 65, with BMI under 40, females had significantly higher mean LOS than males (1.70 and 1.47 days respectively, p< 0.001). And in non-morbidly obese patients under the age of 65, females still experienced significantly higher mean LOS compared to males (1.35 and 1.11 days respectively, p<0.001). Conclusions. Our findings indicate that despite implementation of rapid recovery protocols, morbidly obese patients experienced significantly higher LOS than non-morbidly obese patients. Compared to their male counterparts, non-morbidly obese female patients had significantly higher LOS

Purpose: Displaced acetabular fractures require operative intervention for optimal results. Obesity and morbid obesity is becoming more prevalent. Morbid obesity is defined as a body-mass index (BMI) > 40. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the early results of operative treatment of acetabular fractures in morbidly obese patients. Method: A prospectively gathered database demonstrated 349 patients who underwent ORIF for acetabular fractures over a 60 month period. Of those patients, 39 were morbidly obese. Patient weights were collected from anesthesia records. There were 15 posterior wall, 10 transverse/posterior wall, 5 T-type, 3 transverse, 3 anterior column/posterior hemi-transverse, 1 anterior column, 1 posterior column/posterior wall, and 1 both column fractures. Early results of morbidly obese patients (Group 1) were reviewed. Perioperative complications were compared to patients with BMI < 40 (Group 2). Factors evaluated were: estimated blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, and overall complication rate (as defined by wound complications or heterotopic ossification requiring subsequent surgery, failure of fixation, nerve palsy, death). Results: Follow up ranged from 6–48 months. Fracture reductions were perfect in 23, imperfect in 10, and poor in 6. Fixation failure was noted in 9 patients and typically associated with comminuted posterior wall fractures. Eight patients developed deep infections necessitating debridements. Nine patients required secondary surgery for wound healing problems. Of those, 6 required one additional surgery, three required 2, two required 3, one required 5, and one required 12 additional surgeries. Six patients proceeded to THA and two of those required revisions. The average EBL was 903cc in group 1 versus 630cc in group 2 (p < 0.044). Operative time averaged 293 minutes in group 1 versus 250 in group 2 (p< 0.008). Hospital stay for group 1 averaged 26 days versus 15 days in group 2 (p< 0.008). Complication rate for group 1 was 67% versus 16% in group 2. Conclusion: This data shows that there is a significant increase in estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay. Moreover, the risk of complications should be heavily weighed prior to operative intervention

Background:. The rising number of morbidly obese patients may have significant consequences on the health care system. It may alter the effectiveness, safety as well as cost of certain surgical procedures. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is rapidly gaining in popularity. We investigated the effect of morbid obesity on outcomes, complications, disposition and cost in morbidly obese patients undergoing RSA in a 1: 3 case control series. Methods:. Our joint registry was searched for all patients undergoing primary RSA (excluding fractures) with a minimum of 24 months follow-up from 2003–2010; 21 patients with Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35 were identified (follow-up 45 ± 16 months, 17 females and 4 males, age 69 ± 7) and compared to 63 matched control patients with BMI<30 (follow-up 48 ± 20, 50 females, age 71 ± 6). Outcome data was obtained pre- and postoperatively. Patients' Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index (CDI), total comorbidities, operative time, blood loss (EBL), hospitalization length, disposition, cost and complications were recorded. Results:. There were significant (p < 0.05 for all) and comparable improvements in clinical outcomes, i.e. ASES 32→69 versus 40→78) and range-of-motion (i.e. elevation 61°→140° versus 74°→153°). Obese patients had less notching (1/21 versus 5/63, p = 0.007). Obese patients had more total comorbidities excluding obesity (6 versus 4, p = 0.001), higher CDI (2 versus 1, p = 0.025) and higher rates of obstructive sleep apnea (48% versus 3%, p = 0.0001). They had longer operative time by 13 minutes (p = 0.014) and higher EBL by 40 ml (p = 0.008). Length of stay was similar (3.1 versus 2.6 days, p = 0.21) but a 6-fold higher rate of discharge to facilities (6/21 versus 3/63, p = 0.007) and a higher readmission rate (2 versus 0, p = 0.06) was seen in obese patients. Hospital cost was higher by $2,958.00 (p = 0.02). Major (n = 4 versus 8) and minor complication rates (n = 3 versus 14) were similar (p = 0.479 and 0.440, respectively). No intraoperative complications or mechanical device failures were noted in either group. Conclusions:. RSA was as safe and effective in morbidly obese patients, but an increased cost, disposition to facilities and needs after discharge was observed

Purpose: The increasing trend of morbidly obese patients (BMI 40+) requiring joint replacement is becoming a growing concern in Total Hip Replacement (THR) surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence that BMI may have on implant longevity and clinical outcome using prospectively collected patient data. Method: A consecutive cohort of 2864 THR’s in 2488 patients with osteoarthritis and a minimum 2 years follow-up were evaluated. Patients were divided into appropriate BMI categories; Normal and Underweight (BMI< 25, n=650), Overweight (BMI 25–29.9, n=1069), Obese (BMI 30–39.9, n=981), and Morbidly Obese (BMI 40+, n=164). Pre-operative, latest, and change in clinical outcome scores (HSS, SF12, WOMAC) were analyzed using ANOVA and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survivorship was determined. Categorical variables such as gender and survival status were analyzed using chi-squared. Results: Morbidly Obese patients requiring THR’s were significantly younger than all other BMI groups by 5.4±0.83 years (p< 0.0001). Gender was also significant to BMI grouping with more females being Morbidly Obese and Normal or Underweight (p< 0.0001). All pre-operative and latest HHS and WOMAC domain scores were lower for the Morbidly Obese, significantly in all preoperative score domains and latest HHS Function (p< 0.05). The change in clinical scores from pre-operative to latest was greatest in all domains for the Morbidly Obese group. K-M cumulative survival with implant revision as the endpoint at 10 years was not different between the BMI groups. Revision rates for infection for the Morbidly Obese, Obese, Overweight, and Normal were 1.3%, 0.65%, 0.3% and 0.69% respectively. Overall Revision rates for the Morbidly Obese, Obese, Overweight, and Normal were 6.7%, 5.4%, 6.9% and 5.7% respectively and were not found to be significant (p=0.496). Conclusion: The Morbidly Obese cohort undergoing THR had significantly lower preoperative and lower postoperative clinical outcome scores than all other BMI groups but demonstrated the most significant improvement. No difference was found in the K-M survivorship although revisions and revisions for infection were not equal between the groups

Aims. This study investigated the influence of body mass index (BMI) on the post-operative fall in the level of haemoglobin (Hb), length of hospital stay (LOS), 30-day re-admission rate, functional outcome and quality of life, two years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients and Methods. A total of 7733 patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA between 2001 and 2010 were included. The mean age was 67 years (30 to 90). There were 1421 males and 6312 females. The patients were categorised into three groups: BMI < 25.0 kg/m. 2. (normal); BMI between 25.0 and 39.9 kg/m. 2. (obese); and BMI ≥ 40.0 kg/m. 2. (morbidly obese). Results. Compared with the normal and obese groups, the mean LOS was longer by one day (95% confidence interval (CI) 0 to 2) in the morbidly obese group (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001 respectively). The 30-day re-admisison rate was also higher in the morbidly obese group compared to the obese group (OR 2.323, 95% CI 1.101 to 4.900, p = 0.024); and showed a higher trend compared to the normal group (OR 1.850, 95% CI 0.893 to 3.831, p = 0.100). However, the morbidly obese group had a smaller drop in post-operative Hb level by a mean of 0.5 g/dl (0.3 to 0.6) and 0.3 g/dl (0.1 to 0.5), when compared with the normal and obese groups respectively (both p < 0.001). Furthermore, the mean improvement in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) at two years follow-up was three points (two to four) and five points (two to seven) more in the morbidly obese group than in the normal group (both p < 0.001). The mean improvement in Knee Society Function Score, and Physical and Mental Component Scores of Short Form-36 were comparable between the three BMI groups (p = 0.736, p = 0.739 and p = 0.731 respectively). The ten-year rate of survival was 98.8% (98.0 to 99.3), 98.9% (98.5 to 99.2) and 98.0% (95.8 to 100), for the normal, obese and morbidly obese groups, respectively (p = 0.703). Conclusion. Although morbidly obese patients have a longer LOS and higher 30-day re-admission rate after TKA, they have a smaller drop in post-operative Hb level and larger improvement in OKS and KSKS at two years follow-up. The ten-year rate of survival of TKA was also comparable with those with a normal BMI. . Take home message: Morbidly obese patients should not be excluded from the benefits of TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:780–5

The purpose of this population-based study was to determine the association between morbid obesity and 10-year mortality and complications in patients undergoing primary THA. A cohort study of 22,251 patients, aged 45–74 years old, treated with primary THA between 2002 and 2007 for osteoarthritis, was conducted using Ontario administrative healthcare databases. Patients were followed for 10 years. Risk ratios (RRs) of mortality, reoperation, revision, and dislocation in patients with body mass index (BMI) > 45 kg/m2(morbidly obese patients) compared with BMI ≤45 kg/m2 (non-morbidly obese) were estimated. 3.3% of the cohort (726) was morbidly obese. Morbidly obese patients were younger (mean age 60.6 vs. 63.3, P-value < 0 .001) and more likely to be female (63.9% vs. 52.2%, P-value < 0 .001), compared with non-morbidly obese patients. Morbid obesity was associated with higher 10-year risk of death (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.18, 1.62). Risks of revision (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.96, 2.13) and dislocation (RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.38, 4.10) were higher in morbidly obese men, compared with non-morbidly obese men, there were no associations between obesity and revision or dislocation in women. Risk of reoperation was higher in morbidly obese women, compared to non-morbidly obese women (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.05, 2.40), there was no association between obesity and reoperation in men. Morbidly obese patients undergoing primary THA are at higher risks of long-term mortality and complications. There were differences in complication risk by sex. Results should inform evidence-based perioperative counseling of morbidly obese patients considering THA

We carried out a prospective, continuous study on 529 patients who underwent primary total knee replacement between January 2006 and December 2007 at a major teaching hospital. The aim was to investigate weight change and the functional and clinical outcome in non-obese and obese groups at 12 months post-operatively. The patients were grouped according to their pre-operative body mass index (BMI) as follows: non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m. 2. ), obese (BMI . 3. 30 to 39 kg/m. 2. ) and morbidly obese (BMI > 40 kg/m. 2. ). The clinical outcome data were available for all patients and functional outcome data for 521 (98.5%). Overall, 318 (60.1%) of the patients were obese or morbidly obese. At 12 months, a clinically significant weight loss of ≥ 5% had occurred in 40 (12.6%) of the obese patients, but 107 (21%) gained weight. The change in the International Knee Society score was less in obese and morbidly obese compared with non-obese patients (p = 0.016). Adverse events occurred in 30 (14.2%) of the non-obese, 59 (22.6%) of the obese and 20 (35.1%) of the morbidly obese patients (p = 0.001)

A prospective, multi-centre study was carried out on 1421 total hip replacements between January 1999 and July 2007 to examine if obesity has an effect on clinical outcomes. The patients were categorised into three groups: non-obese (body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m. 2. ), obese (BMI 30 to 40 kg/m. 2. ) and morbidly obese (BMI > 40 kg/m. 2. ). The primary outcome measure was the change in Oxford hip score at five years. Secondary outcome measures included dislocation and revision rates, increased haemorrhage, deep infection, deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, mean operating time and length of hospital stay. Radiological analysis assessing heterotopic ossification, femoral osteolysis and femoral stem positioning was performed. Data were incomplete for 362 hips (25.5%). There was no difference in the change in the Oxford hip score, complication rates or radiological changes at five years between the groups. The morbidly obese group was significantly younger and required a significantly longer operating time. Obese and morbidly obese patients have as much to gain from total hip replacement as non-obese patients

To describe the longitudinal trends in patients with obesity and Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) undergoing TKA and the associated impact on complications and lengths of hospital stay. We identified patients who underwent primary TKA between 2006 – 2017 within the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. We recorded patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day major and minor complications. We labelled those with an obese Body Mass Index (BMI ≥ 30), hypertension, and diabetes as having MetS. We evaluated mean BMI, LOS, and 30-day complication rates in all patients, obese patients, and those with MetS from 2006-2017. We used multivariable regression to evaluate the trends in BMI, complications, and LOS over time in all patients and those with MetS, and the effect of BMI and MetS on complication rates and LOS, stratified by year. 270,846 patients underwent primary TKA at hospitals participating in the NSQIP database. 63.71% of patients were obese (n = 172,333), 15.21% were morbidly obese (n = 41,130), and 12.37% met criteria for MetS (n = 33,470). Mean BMI in TKA patients increased at a rate of 0.03 per year (0.02-0.05; p < 0 .0001). Despite this, the rate of adverse events in obese patients decreased: major complications by an odds ratio (OR) of 0.94 (0.93-0.96; p < 0 .0001) and minor complications by 0.94 (0.93-0.95; p < 0 .001). LOS also decreased over time at an average rate of −0.058 days per year (-0.059 to −0.057; p < 0 .0001). The proportion of patients with MetS did not increase, however similar improvements in major complications (OR 0.94 [0.91-0.97] p < 0 .0001), minor complications (OR 0.97 [0.94-1.00]; p < 0 .0330), and LOS (mean −0.055 [-0.056 to −0.054] p < 0 .0001) were found. In morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥ 40), there was a decreased proportion per year (OR 0.989 [0.98-0.994] p < 0 .0001). Factors specifically associated with major complications in obese patients included COPD (OR 1.75 [1.55-2.00] p < 0.0001) and diabetes (OR 1.10 [1.02-1.1] p = 0.017). Hypertension (OR 1.12 [1.03-1.21] p = 0.0079) was associated with minor complications. Similarly, in patients with MetS, major complications were associated with COPD (OR 1.72 [1.35-2.18] p < 0.0001). Neuraxial anesthesia was associated with a lower risk for major complications in the obese cohort (OR 0.87 [0.81-0.92] p < 0.0001). BMI ≥ 40 was associated with a greater risk for minor complications (OR 1.37 [1.26-1.50] p < 0.0001), major complications (1.11 [1.02-1.21] p = 0.015), and increased LOS (+0.08 days [0.07-0.09] p < 0.0001). Mean BMI in patients undergoing primary TKA increased from 2006 - 2017. MetS comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension elevated the risk for complications in obese patients. COPD contributed to higher rates of major complications. The obesity-specific risk reduction with spinal anesthesia suggests an improved post-anesthetic clinical course in obese patients with pre-existing pulmonary pathology. Encouragingly, the overall rates of complications and LOS in patients with obesity and MetS exhibited a longitudinal decline. This finding may be related to the decreased proportion of patients with BMI ≥ 40 treated over the same period, possibly the result of quality improvement initiatives aimed at delaying high-risk surgery in morbidly obese patients until healthy weight loss is achieved. These findings may also reflect increased awareness and improved management of these patients and their elevated risk profiles

Aim. To compare the results of total knee replacement in a consecutive series of morbidly obese patients (body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m. 2. ) with a matched group of non-obese (BMI< 30 kg/m. 2. ) patients. Methods. 41 consecutive total knee replacements performed in morbidly obese patients were matched pre-operatively with 41 total knee replacements performed in non-obese patients for age, sex, diagnosis, type of prosthesis, laterality, knee score and function score components of the Knee Society Score (KSS). All patients were prospectively followed up and the post-operative KSS, radiographs, complications (superficial wound infection, deep joint infection, deep venous thrombosis, peri-operative mortality) and five-year survivorship compared for the two groups. No patients were lost to follow-up (mean follow-up in morbidly obese: 38.5 (range 6-66) months; non-obese: 44 (range 6-67) months). Results. The mean knee score was inferior in the morbidly obese group compared to the non-obese group, but the difference only approached significance (p=0.08). The mean function score was significantly inferior in the morbidly obese group compared to the non-obese group (p=0.01). Total knee replacements performed in morbidly obese patients were associated with a significantly higher incidence of radiolucent lines on post-operative radiographs (29% vs. 7%, p=0.02) and a significantly higher complication rate (32% vs. 0%, p=0.001). The five-year survivorship based on revision and pain as endpoints was 72.3% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 52.1%-92.5%) for the morbidly obese group compared to 97.6% (95% CI 92.9%-100%) for the non-obese group (log-rank test, p = 0.02). Conclusion. In a subgroup of obese patients who are morbidly obese, the results of total knee replacement are poor. These patients should be advised to lose weight prior to surgery or be warned of the inferior results before proceeding with surgery

Introduction. Perioperative optimization efforts have improved outcomes following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, morbidly obese patients continue to have increased rates of complications. The purpose of this study was to assess if rates of early complications after TKA have similarly improved for both morbidly obese and non-morbidly obese patients. Methods. Elective, primary TKA patients from 2011–2018 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were stratified by body mass index (BMI) <40 kg/m. 2. and ≥40 kg/m. 2. Thirty-day rates of infectious complications, readmissions, and reoperation were assessed. Trends in these endpoints over the study period were compared between BMI groups utilizing odds ratios (OR) and multivariate analyses. Results. In total, 314,719 patients underwent TKA and 46,386 (15%) had BMI ≥40 kg/m. 2. From 2011–2018, the reoperation rate significantly improved from 1.2% to 1.0% (OR: 0.6 [0.6–0.7]) for patients with BMI <40 kg/m. 2. , as did rates of readmission (4.5% to 2.9%, OR: 0.8 [0.7–0.99]). Patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m. 2. also had a significant decrease in the rate of readmission over the study period (4.9% to 3.3%, OR: 0.6 [0.5–0.8]); however, the rate of reoperation did not significantly change (1.4% to 1.4%, OR: 1.0 [0.6–1.6]). Significant improvements were not observed for infectious complications over time for either group. However, patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m. 2. consistently had increased risk of both deep infection from 2014–2018 (2014 OR: 2.2 [1.4–3.4], 2018: 2.2 [1.6–3.0]) and wound complications from 2011–2018 (2011 OR: 1.7 [1.2–2.6], 2018 OR: 2.0 [1.7–2.4]) compared to non-morbidly obese patients. Conclusion. Although readmission rates significantly decreased for all patients, improvements in reoperation rates observed in non-morbidly obese patients were not experienced by the morbidly obese – resulting in a widening of the complication gap between these cohorts. Care improvements have not lowered the differential risk of infectious complications compared to non-morbidly obese

Background. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a lysine analog that has been shown to reduce intra-operative blood loss in total joint replacements. Effect of TXA in morbid obese patients has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of TXA on change of haematocrit (HCT) and packed RBC (PRBC) blood transfusion rate in our institution, especially in morbid obese patients. Methods. Between January 2014 and December 2014, 216 primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty were identified from our prospective institutional database. All cases were performed by two adult reconstruction specialists. All primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) were non-cemented and all primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA) were cemented with similar implant and technique. Use of TXA in our institution was initiated on August of 2014. TXA was given intravenously (IV) as one gram prior to incision and one gram at the time of femoral preparation in THA or cementation in TKA, not exceeding 10mg/kg. In cases where IV TXA was contraindicated, topical was used. We analyzed pre- and post-operative hematocrit and transfusion rate. Criteria for transfusion was HCT < 25 or Hb < 9. 72 patients (33%) were considered morbid obese with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35. Results. In the non-TXA group, 50 out of 126 cases (40%) were transfused (17 THA, 25 TKA, 5 revision THA, 3 revision TKA), ranging from 1–5 PRBC. In the TXA group, 13 out of 90 cases (14%) were transfused (3 THA, 8 TKA, 2 revision THA), ranging 1–2 PRBC. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.0001). The overall drop in the TXA group HCT was 5.9 ± 3.9, as compared to 9.8 ± 4.3 in the non-TXA groups, which was statistically significant (p=0.0001). The mean pre- and post-operative HCT was 37.4 ± 4.3 and 28.2 ± 3 in the transfused patients without TXA. The average drop in HCT was 9.3 ± 4.3. The mean pre- and post-operative HCT was 34.3 ± 4.1 and 27.4 ± 1.9 in the transfused patients without TXA. The average drop in HCT was 7.3 ± 2.9. In the morbid obese patients, 45 did not receive TXA, 17 had transfusion with average drop in HCT of 9.6 ± 3.9; 29 received TXA and 2 had transfusion with average drop in HCT of 5.9 ± 3.1. There transfusion and drop in HCT was significantly less for morbid obese patients that received TXA (p=0.0001). Discussion and Conclusions. Since initiating TXA in our institution, the overall transfusion rate in both primary and revision arthroplasty cases have dramatically declined (26%). This was more evident in morbidly obese patients. In cases that needed transfusion with TXA, only one or two PRBC was given, which was a drastic improvement

Obesity is clearly a worldwide epidemic with significant social, health care and economic implications. A clear association between obesity and the need for both hip and knee replacement surgery has been demonstrated. Specifically the presence of class 3 obesity (BMI > 40) increases the incidence of THA by 8.5 times and the incidence of TKA by 32.7 times, compared with patients of normal weight. Issues related to TJA in the morbidly obese include:. Outcomes - There is a growing body of evidence to support the premise that patients undergoing either THA or TKA who are morbidly obese derive significant benefit from the surgical intervention. Specifically patient and disease specific outcome measures (WOMAC, SF-12, KSCRS, HSS) demonstrate equal change between pre-operative and post-operative scores in those patients of normal weight compared to the morbidly obese cohort. Complications - It would appear that the rate of deep infection is increased in the morbidly obese, and that the greater the BMI, the greater the risk of infection. This is important to understand and appreciate pre-operatively as the surgeon discusses the risk/benefit ratio of the operative intervention. There is little debate that performing total joint arthroplasty in the morbidly obese is technically challenging and that the potential for increased peri-operative morbidity, particularly in the form of infection is present. That being said, the realised benefit to the patient of the surgical intervention is significant, and denying surgery on the basis of obesity alone is not justified

Obesity is clearly a worldwide epidemic with significant social, healthcare and economic implications. A clear association between obesity and the need for both hip and knee replacement surgery has been demonstrated. Specifically the presence of class 3 obesity (BMI > 40) increases the incidence of THA by 8.5 times, and the incidence of TKA by 32.7 times, compared with patients of normal weight. Issues related to TJA in the morbidly obese include: Outcomes - There is a growing body of evidence to support the premise that patients undergoing either THA or TKA who are morbidly obese derive significant benefit from the surgical intervention. Specifically patient and disease specific outcome measures (WOMAC, SF-12, KSCRS, HSS) demonstrate equal change between preoperative and postoperative scores in those patients of normal weight compared to the morbidly obese cohort; Complications - It would appear that the rate of deep infection is increased in the morbidly obese, and that the greater the BMI, the greater the risk of infection. This is important to understand and appreciate preoperatively as the surgeon discusses the risk/benefit ratio of the operative intervention. There is little debate that performing total joint arthroplasty in the morbidly obese is technically challenging and that the potential for increased perioperative morbidity, particularly in the form of infection is present. That being said, the realised benefit to the patient of the surgical intervention is significant, and denying surgery on the basis of obesity alone is not justified

Aims. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between prior sleeve gastrectomy in patients undergoing primary total hip and knee arthroplasty, and 90-day complications, incidence of revision arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome scores at final follow-up. Methods. This is a retrospective, single-centre analysis. Patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty with a prior sleeve gastrectomy were eligible for inclusion (n = 80 patients). A morbidly obese control group was established from the same institutional registry using a 1:2 match, for cases:controls with arthroplasty based on propensity score using age, sex, pre-sleeve gastrectomy BMI, Current Procedural Terminology code to identify anatomical location, and presurgical haemoglobin A1C. Outcomes included 90-day complications, incidence of revision arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome scores at final follow-up. Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated associations of underlying preoperative demographic and treatment characteristics with outcomes. Results. Complications within 90 days of surgery were increased in the sleeve gastrectomy group relative to the obese control group after controlling for underlying preoperative demographic characteristics (odds ratio (OR) 4.00 (95% CI 1.14 to 13.9); p = 0.030). Postoperative revisions were similar in the sleeve gastrectomy group relative to the obese control group after controlling for underlying preoperative demographic characteristics (OR 17.8 (95% CI 0.64 to 494.3); p = 0.090). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression decreased by a greater amount from pre- to postoperative in the obese controls relative to the sleeve gastrectomy group (OR 4.04 (95% CI 0.06 to 8.02); p = 0.047). PROMIS pain interference and physical function change from pre- to postoperative was not associated with sleeve gastrectomy status. Conclusion. We found a higher rate of complications at 90 days in patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy prior to primary hip or knee arthroplasty relative to a matched, obese control population. Prosthetic revision rates were similar between the two groups, while improvements in PROMIS depression scores were larger in the obese cohort. This study suggests that sleeve gastrectomy to achieve preoperative weight loss prior to arthroplasty surgery may not mitigate early complication risks in obese patient populations. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(9):935–941

Introduction and Aims: Morbid obesity (BMI> 40) has been shown to cause increased perioperative morbidity and poorer long-term implant survivorship following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine the impact of morbid obesity on patient-reported outcomes following TKA. Methods: Patients undergoing primary TKA were invited to complete questionnaires preoperatively and one year after surgery. Questionnaires include the WOMAC and SF-36 health status measures, demographics, self-reported comorbid medical conditions, height and weight. At follow-up, satisfaction with results of TKA is included. Patients were categorised by their preoperative BMI categories as ideal weight (20–25), overweight (> 25–30), obese (> 30–40) or morbidly obese (> 40). We used multivariate analysis to adjust for known significant correlates of WOMAC and SF-36, namely age, gender and comorbid medical conditions. Adjusted mean scores for each assessment were compared by BMI category. Results: A total of 769 patients were included in the study which included 27 morbidly obese, 280 obese, 314 overweight and 148 ideal weight patients. Morbidly obese patients when compared with non-obese patients had significantly worse preoperative WOMAC pain and function and a trend for worse SF36 scores (Vitality significantly worse, p=0.04). There was no significant difference between the BMI categories at one year for WOMAC or SF-36 scores (trend for the Physical Functioning score to be lower, p=0.052). Morbidly obese patients were all satisfied with pain relief after surgery but were less satisfied with functional results when compared to the non-obese groups. Discussion: This study shows that morbidly obese patients report significantly worse health status prior to TKA but their post-operative improvement is greater than the non-obese population. Although morbid obesity should not be an absolute contraindication to TKA, patients should be carefully selected balancing the risk of perioperative complications and earlier failure against the demonstrated marked improvement in quality of life

Introduction. Given the association of osteoarthritis with obesity, the typical patient requiring total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often obese. Obesity has been shown to negatively influence outcomes following TKA, as it is associated with increased perioperative complications and poorer clinical and functional outcomes. Achieving proper limb alignment can be more difficult in the obese patient, potentially requiring a longer operation compared to non-obese patients. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI), a technique that utilizes MR- or CT-based customized guides for intraoperative cutting block placement, may offer a more efficient alternative to manual instruments for the obese patient. We hypothesize that the additional information provided by a preoperative MRI or CT may allow surgeons to achieve better alignment in less time compared to manual instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to assess whether PSI offers an improved operation length or limb alignment compared to manual instruments for nonmorbidly and morbidly obese patients. Methods. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 77 PSI TKA and 25 manual TKA performed in obese patients (BMI≥30) between February 2013 and May 2015. During this period, all patients underwent PSI TKA unless unable to undergo MR scanning. All cases were performed by a single experienced surgeon and utilized a single implant system (Zimmer Persona™). PSI cases were performed using the MR-based Zimmer Patient Specific Instrumentation system. Tourniquet times were recorded to determine length of operation. Long-standing radiographs were obtained preoperatively and 4-weeks postoperatively to evaluate limb alignment. Cases were subdivided by nonmorbid obesity (30≤BMI<40) and morbid obesity (BMI≥40) to assess the effect of increasing obesity on outcomes. Results. PSI and manual cohorts were similar with regards to age, gender, and preoperative alignment. Tourniquet time was significantly shorter in the PSI group for nonmorbidly obese patients (PSI 49.8 minutes vs manual 58.3 minutes; p=0.005) (Figure 1). Postoperative mechanical axis was similar between groups for both nonmorbidly obese (PSI 1.8° vs manual 2.9°; p=0.338) and morbidly obese patients (PSI 4.0° vs manual 3.6°; p=0.922). Mechanical axis outliers (greater than 3° neutral), though nonsignificant, were fewer in the PSI group for nonmorbidly obese (PSI 21.8% vs manual 35.3%; p=0.318) and morbidly obese patients (PSI 46.1% vs manual 75.0%; p=0.362). Discussion. We found that PSI significantly shortened operation length for nonmorbidly obese patients compared to manual instruments. Obesity is strongly associated with increased perioperative infection rates, as is prolonged operation length. The decreased operation length achieved with PSI in the nonmorbidly obese patient may as a consequence decrease infection rates, though further study is necessary. Though not statistically significant, PSI showed a trend toward decreasing overall mechanical axis outliers for both nonmorbidly obese and morbidly obese patients. The use of patient specific instrumentation compared to manual instruments has been controversial in the literature. However, patient specific instrumentation may be favorable in the obese patient, offering a shorter operation length and possibly improved alignment

Obesity and the diseases linked to it such as diabetes have been associated with higher complication rates and increased medical costs following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Due to the rising prevalence of obesity and the adverse impact it has on the development of osteoarthritis, there has been a worldwide surge in the number of obese patients presenting for THA procedures, including those morbidly obese (BMI > 40) and those who are super-obese (BMI > 50). The Reward. When THA is successful (as is true for the majority of morbidly obese patients) the operation is just as dramatically effective as it is for other patients. Excellent pain relief and dramatically improved function is the result, even though obese patients generally achieve a lower overall level of function than non-obese patients. Morbidly obese patients with a successful THA and without early complications are some of the most grateful of patients. This is especially true if they have been denied surgery for prolonged periods due to their weight and have had to bear severe joint changes and symptoms during a long period of time leading up to arthroplasty. The Risks. There is a nonlinear increase in complications, reoperations, and especially infection with increasing BMI that begins between a BMI of 25 to 30, and rises thereafter with a relative inflection point in some incidence curves for complications at around a BMI of 40. This has caused some surgeons to suggest a BMI of 40 as an upper limit for elective hip arthroplasty. Risks continue to rise after a BMI of 40 and when the BMI is over 50, in our series 52% of patients had at least one complication. Of these 24% had at least one major complication and 33% at least one minor complication with some suffering more than one complication overall. These data make it reasonable to ask whether the outcomes in some morbidly obese patients might be improved by weight loss, bariatric surgical intervention and other measures aimed at optimizing the multiple companion comorbidities and medical conditions (such as diabetes) that often accompany excess weight. Unfortunately there has been limited information to date on the best means for optimizing of these patients, and as important the effectiveness of these interventions, so that the timing and performance of the eventual arthroplasty procedures might have the highest possible success rate. The Costs. The adverse impact of obesity on medical resource utilization and costs associated with THA has been well documented, Due to longer initial length of stay, greater resource utilization, higher early complication rates and any readmissions and reoperations the costs for even a single individual patient can climb dramatically. In a review of data on primary THA patients from our institution, even after adjusting for age, sex, type of surgery, and other comorbidities, for every 5 unit increase in BMI beyond 30 kg/m2 there was an associated $500 higher cost of hospitalization and an increase of $900 in 90-day total costs (p=0.0001). The Future. The numbers of morbidly obese patients with severe osteoarthritis presenting for possible THA will only continue to increase in the years ahead. Comprehensive multidisciplinary programs are urgently needed to better manage obese patients with weight reduction options, optimization of medical comorbidities, and treatment of any associated issues, such as protein malnutrition. When end-stage joint changes and symptoms occur we must have such help to maximise the benefit and reduce the complications of hip arthroplasty in this high risk patient population

Literature has suggested that obese (BMI >30) and morbidly obese (BMI > 35) patients should not be offered surgery as a day case due to increases in complication and readmission rates. At Torbay hospital, patients are routinely offered day case surgery, in a specialist day case unit, regardless of BMI. This is done with minimal complications and enables a higher throughput of patients and at least 75% of surgical procedures to be performed as a day case, as per NHS guidelines. We present 12 year data of day case knee arthroscopy surgery performed at Torbay hospital. Over 12 years, 3421 knee arthroscopies were performed. 649 were performed on obese patients and 222 on morbidly obese patients. No anaesthetic complications were observed in any of the obese patient groups and readmissions rates (up to 28 days) were 0.8% in the morbidly obese group and 0.9% in the Obese group, compared to 0.9% for patients with BMI <30. Our data shows that day case surgery can be performed on all patients regardless of BMI and patient obesity. We believe that other units should offer surgery to obese and morbidly obese patients to allow increased efficiency and achievement of NHS day case guidelines

With obesity on the rise in Israel, most of the medical staff will probably encounter the unique challenges that result from the pathophysiological changes in this population. Morbid obesity is a chronic disease manifesting itself in a steady and slow-progressive increase in body weight. Currently, BMI is considered the best score for morbid obesity definition and it is calculated by dividing the body weight (kgs) in body surface area (m2). The score for morbid obesity is above 40 kg/m2 and has many systemic implications such as hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular changes, especially it effects the musculoskeletal system. Complex multiple trauma in morbid obesity patients present a challenge throughout all stages of treatment: assessment of injury, preliminary care, and definitive surgical approach. In the last two years five morbid obese patients (all weighted more than 150 kgs) sustained various degrees of high-energy multiple-trauma and were operated on in our institution. The patient presented with the following injuries:. Femoral fracture. Femoral fractures and contralateral tibial fracture. Neck of femur fracture, comminuted forearm fracture and ARDS. Pelvic fracture and ARDS. Pelvic fracture and bilateral segmental fractures of femora, bilateral patellar fractures and ARDS. The preoperative, operative and post-operative care presented special curative dilemma and pitfalls which required modifications in regular treatment modalities such as improvisation in special equipment and surgical techniques. The operating tables had to be changed so they could sustain the increased patient’s weight and allow, in the same time, modified percutaneous surgical approaches to overcome the anatomical problems. In all patients we were able to achieve the main goal of trauma treatment, i.e. stable fixation of fractures and mobilization. The experience we have gained in managing and overcoming these obstacles may serve as a basis for devising guidelines for the comprehensive treatment of these patients

Computer navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has several proposed benefits including reduced post operative blood loss. We compared the total blood volume loss in a cohort of morbidly obese (BMI> 40) patients undergoing computer navigated (n=30) or standard intramedullary techniques (n=30) with a cohort of matched patients with a BMI< 30 also undergoing navigated (n=31) or standard TKA (n=31). Total body blood loss was calculated from body weight, height and haemotocrit change, using a model which accurately assesses true blood loss as was maximum allowable blood loss. The groups were matched for age, gender, diagnosis and operative technique. The mean true blood volume loss was significantly (p< 0.001) less in the computer assisted group (1014±312mls) compared to the conventional group (1287±330mls). Patients with a BMI > 40 and a computer navigated procedure (1105 ±321mls) had a significantly lower (p< 0.001) blood volume loss compared to those who underwent a conventional TKA (1399±330mls). There was no significant difference in the transfusion rate or those reaching the maximum allowable blood loss between groups. This study confirms a significant reduction in total body blood loss between computer assisted and conventional TKA in morbidly obese patients. However computer navigation did not affect the transfusion rate or those reaching the transfusion trigger in the morbidly obese group. Therefore computer navigation may reduce blood loss in the morbidly obese patient but this may not be clinically relevant to transfusion requirements as previously suggested

Purpose: The growing trend of morbidly obese (BMI 40+) patients requiring a total joint replacement is becoming major concern in total knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the affects that BMI may have on implant longevity and clinical patient outcome using historical patient data. Method: A consecutive cohort of 3083 TKA’s in 2048 patients since 1995 (minimum 2 years follow-up) were evaluated. Pre-operative scores, latest scores, and change in clinical outcome scores (KSCRS, SF12, WOMAC) were analyzed using ANOVA and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survivorship was determined. Results: K-M cumulative survival at 10 years by BMI group was 0.951±0.033 for Normal and Underweight (< 25, n=277), 0.944±0.024 for Overweight (25–29.9, n=915), 0.882±0.032 for Obese (30–39.9, n=1460) and 0.843±0.076 for Morbidly Obese (40+, n=352). Cumulative revision rates were 1.8% for Normal and Underweight, 1.9% for Overweight, 2.9% for Obese and 2.8% for Morbidly Obese. All pre-operative clinical scores were significantly different between the Morbidly Obese and all other BMI groups (p< 0.05), with the non-morbidly obese having higher scores in all cases. Significant difference was found in the change in WOMAC domain scores and the KSCRS knee score (p< 0.05) between the morbidly obese group and all other BMI groups, with the morbidly obese having the greatest improvement in all domains. Conclusion: The morbidly obese patient cohort (BMI > 40) undergoing TKA demonstrated the most significant improvement in clinical outcome scores; however also had the lowest cumulative 10 year survivorship. This risk/benefit information is important in pre-operative discussions with this challenging, and increasingly prevalent, patient population

We studied a consecutive series of 285 uncemented total hip replacements in 260 patients using the Taperloc femoral component and the T-Tap acetabular component. The outcome of every hip was determined in both living and deceased patients. A complete clinical and radiological follow-up was obtained for 209 hips in 188 living patients, followed for a mean of 14.5 years (10 to 18.9). They were divided into two groups, obese and non-obese, as determined by their body mass index. There were 100 total hip replacements in 89 patients in the obese cohort (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m. 2. ), and 109 in 99 non-obese (body mass index < 30 kg/m. 2. ) patients. A subgroup analysis of 31 patients of normal weight (body mass index 20 kg/m. 2. to 25 kg/m. 2. ) (33 hips) and 26 morbidly obese patients (body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m. 2. ) (30 hips) was also carried out. In the obese group five femoral components (5%) were revised and one (1%) was loose by radiological criteria. Femoral cortical osteolysis was seen in eight hips (8%). The acetabular component was revised in 57 hips (57%) and a further 17 (17%) were loose. The mean Harris hip score improved from 52 (30 to 66) pre-operatively to 89 (49 to 100) at final follow-up. Peri-operative complications occurred in seven patients (7%). In the non-obese group six (6%) femoral components were revised and one (1%) was loose. Femoral cortical osteolysis occurred in six hips (6%). The acetabular component was revised in 72 hips (66%) and a further 18 (17%) were loose. The mean Harris hip score increased from 53 (25 to 73) prior to surgery to 89 (53 to 100) at the time of each patient’s final follow-up radiograph. No statistically significant difference was identified between the obese and non-obese patients with regards to clinical and radiological outcome or complications. The subgroup analysis of patients of normal weight and those who were morbidly obese showed no statistically significant difference in the rate of revision of either component. Our findings suggest there is no evidence to support withholding total hip replacement from obese patients with arthritic hips on the grounds that their outcome will be less satisfactory than those who are not obese

Introduction. Previous research has indicated that preoperative modification of risk factors associated with obesity may reduce complications after TKA. However, the optimal method is still debated. This study aims to investigate whether a preoperative Risk Stratification Tool (RST) devised by our institution to optimize obese patients can reduce unexpected ICU transfers, and 90-day ED visits, readmissions, and reoperations. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 1,724 consecutive risk stratified patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA. The mean age was 64.8 years and average body mass index (BMI) was 34.2 kg/m2. All patients underwent preoperative optimization using the RST. We first compared our primary variables of interest between obese (BMI>30, n=1,189) and non-obese patients (n=535). Patients were then divided into 3 groups (I-non-obese, II-obese (30–39.9 kg/m2) and III-morbidly obese ((>40 kg/m2)) and logistic regression was used to evaluate outcomes among the groups adjusted for age, sex, smoking history and diabetes. Results. Overall, obese patients had an increased rate of discharge to facility compared to non-obese patients (38.0% vs 25.9%, p<0.001). After stratifying by BMI (group I (n=535), II (n=793), III (n=396)), discharge to facility remained higher relative to non-obese (25.9%) in both obese (34.0%, OR 1.6, CI 1.3–2.1) and morbidly obese (45.8%, OR 3.0, CI 2.2–4.1) patients. However, there was no difference in unexpected ICU transfer (0.6% non-obese vs 1.0% obese [OR 1.9, CI 0.5–7.3] vs 1.8% morbidly obese [OR 4.1, CI 1.0–17.2]), ED visits (8.6% vs 10.5% [OR 1.3, CI 0.9–1.9] vs 10.3% [OR 1.2, CI 0.7–1.9]), readmissions (4.7% vs 4.3% [OR 1.0, CI 0.6–1.8] vs 4.8% [OR 1.3, CI 0.7–2.6]), or reoperations (2.4% vs 3.3% [OR 1.3, CI 0.6–2.5] vs 3.0% [OR 1.0, CI 0.7–2.2]). Conclusion. Use of a preoperative risk stratification tool is effective at lowering the risk of short-term complications after TKA in obese patients to similar levels as non-obese patients. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Purpose: To determine the extent to which, a medically monitored rapid weight-loss program will improve pain, psychological status and functional abilities for morbidly obese women with knee osteoarthritis. Method: 34 women (age 40 to 65) with morbid obesity and severe osteoarthritis of the knee that presented to an orthopedic surgeon for total knee arthroplasty were offered enrollment into a medically supervised weight loss program prior to consideration of a total knee replacement. Twenty-six subjects chose to participate in the weight loss program. They were enrolled in the Dr. Bernstein diet program, (a low-calorie, low-fat diet) at no cost to them. We collected the following questionnaires at enrollment and every six weeks while they remained in the weight loss program: WOMAC, SF36, Self-Efficacy, Health Locus of control, Dieting beliefs scale, Body image state scale, and the Beck depression inventory as well as Functional tests, namely the Timed up and go (TUG) and 6 minute walk test (6MWT). Our hypothesis was that weight loss would be associated with dramatic improvements in pain, self-report quality of life measures, psychological variables, and measured functional abilities for those patients who were successful in the weight loss program. Results: At enrollment the mean age was 58.5 years and mean BMI was 47.8. Subjects were significantly disabled with WOMAC (total) scores of 48+/ − 7 and impaired function in both the 6 minute walk test 229+/ − 146 metres and the timed up-go test 5.9+/ − 11. (table removed). Subjects lost an average of 32 kilograms (range 14 to 50 kg) after six months of dieting. Weight loss was associated with dramatic improvements in pain(p < .01), self-report quality of life measures (p < .01) and measured functional abilities (p < .01). Successful weight loss was associated with patients’ self-report of no longer requiring TKA for their knee OA. Initially 100% of subjects felt that they required surgery. This decreased to 9.5% after six months of weight loss. Conclusion: A low-fat, low-calorie medically monitored weight loss program (Dr. Bernstein Diet Clinics Inc.) is effective for achieving significant weight loss in women with severe knee osteoarthritis and morbid obesity. Weight loss leads to significant improvements in pain and functional abilities and alleviates or delays the need for knee replacement surgery in the majority of middle-aged, morbidly obese women

Spinal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients can be challenging to the operating surgeon. One of the major problems is obtaining a good surgical access. We have used the synframe retractor system in patients undergoing spinal fusion and have found it especially useful in obese and morbidly obese patients. This study reports our experience. Seventy-seven consecutive obese and morbidly obese patients that underwent spinal decompression and fusion were reviewed. Patient selection was based on BMI values. Those with a BMI of more than thirty were included in the study. There were thirty-eight females and twenty-five males with an age of twenty-one to eighty-one years. Patient charts were used to acquire information regarding age,weight,height,gender,time in surgery, procedure start and end time,and departure. Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were also recorded. Anesthesia notes were used to determine ASA scores,number of preoperative morbidities,and intraoperative blood loss. The synframe was used on all the patients. It is a retractor system which consists of a ring placed around the surgical site. It is fixed to both sides of the operating table with arms. Using retractor blades, the ring allows 360 degree access to the surgical exposure from any side. The set up tme for obese patients was 59.8 minutes and 73.5 minutes for morbidly obese patients. The surgical time and blood loss was only marginally higher in these two groups than in normal weighted patients. The average postoperative length of hospitalisation was 5.8 days. The surgical incision length averaged 7.8 cms for single level and 11.5 for two level fusions. 44% patients suffered a complication. These included cage migration due to a fall, wound infection, dural leak,pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis etc. No significant weight loss was recorded following the surgery. Obese patients are a surgical challenge due to the comorbidities and difficulty in positioning and gaining good surgical access. The use of synframe retractor system improves surgical access, thereby reducing surgical time and blood loss. The surgical incision length was also comparable to normal weighted patients using this system. No significant weight loss was recorded following surgery. The high complication rate can be attributed to the associated comorbidities

There is growing interest in the peri-operative management of patients with indications for hip and knee arthroplasty in the setting of modifiable risk factors such as morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and smoking. A recent survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) found that 95% of respondents address modifiable risk factors prior to surgery. The aim of this study was to poll Australian arthroplasty surgeons regarding their approach to patients with modifiable risk factors. The survey tool used in the AAHKS study was adapted for use in the Australian context and distributed to the membership of the Arthroplasty Society of Australia via Survey Monkey. Seventy-seven survey responses were received, representing a response rate of 64%. The majority of respondents were experienced, high volume arthroplasty surgeons. Overall, 91% of respondents restricted access to arthroplasty for patients with modifiable risk factors. Seventy-two percent of surgeons restricted access for excessive body mass index, 85% for poor diabetic control, and 46% for smoking. Most respondents made decisions based on personal experience or literature review rather than hospital or departmental pressures. Despite differences in healthcare systems, our findings were similar to those of the AAHKS survey, although their responses were more restrictive in all domains. Differences were noted in responses concerning financial considerations for potentially underprivileged populations. The survey is currently being administered by arthroplasty societies in six other countries, allowing comparison of orthopaedic practice across different healthcare systems around the world. In conclusion, over 90% of Australian arthroplasty surgeons who responded to the survey address modifiable risk factors prior to surgery

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip is the most common indication for total hip replacement (THR). Obesity is a risk factor for the development of OA and has recently resulted in patients requiring THRs at much younger ages to relieve pain at the joint capsule and restore mobility. However, the impact of obesity on THR mortality is not well understood. An updated systematic review was performed to identify whether an obese BMI should influence patient selection for surgery. Specifically, the impact of obesity on short-term mortality, long-term mortality, and peri- and post-operative complications was assessed with a particular focus on BMI classes. A comprehensive literature search of Ovid Medline and EMBASE in November 2022 identified relevant papers in accordance with PRISMA methodology. After removing duplicates, 2988 articles underwent strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in 12 papers for analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality risk between obese and non-obese populations. Obesity was associated with a lower risk of short-term mortality than in the normal weight control group, however there was an increased mortality risk in obese patients long-term likely due to comorbidities. Obese patients were significantly younger than normal BMI and underweight patients. However, the paper found increased mortality risk in underweight and morbidly obese patients. Obese patients did not have an increased risk of mortality when compared to non-obese patients following THR. Obesity may have a protective effect on mortality up to a BMI of 40kg/m2, although this may be influenced by the obesity paradox which states only the healthiest obese individuals are selected for surgery, which could attribute to a lower mortality risk. The greatest risk of mortality and complication was associated with underweight patients. As a result, a BMI greater than 30kg/m2 may not necessitate a hip replacement contraindication. It is important surgeons apply careful consideration and comprehensive risk assessment on patients who require a THR, especially at the BMI extremes

Introduction. Obesity is a direct contributor to degenerative joint disease, and as the prevalence of obesity increases globally it is likely that more overweight patients will present for hip replacement surgery. There are reports that overweight patients in the UK's National Health Service, typically with a Body Mass Index (BMI) over 30 (BMI 30–39 obese, BMI≥40 morbidly obese), are being denied operations on the premise that they are at risk of significant complications. Enhanced Recovery Programmes (ERP) are designed to enable patients to recover quickly and return home safely within a few days. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of hip replacements in obese and non-obese patients enrolled in our ERP. Methods. We prospectively studied 350 patients who underwent primary and revision total hip replacements and were treated through our ERP form March 2010 to January 2011. The mean age was 68 (range 23–92 years). 130 patients (37%) were considered obese with a BMI of >30. 11 patients (3%) were considered morbidly obese with a BMI >40. They were age & sex-matched with the non-obese patients. Outcomes measured included: Length of stay, wound complications (including surgical site infections), deep vein thrombosis and blood transfusion requirements. Data was collected to 42 days following discharge. Results. There was no significant difference in the length of stay between the obese (BMI >30) and non-obese (BMI<30) groups; 4.3 days (median 4) and 4.1 days (median 4) respectively. Mean length of stay in the morbidly obese group (BMI≥40) was interestingly, 3.4 days (median 3). 12 patients (9%) in the obese group experienced non-infective wound complications including oozing and haematoma formation compared to 15 patients (7%) of the non-obese group. One confirmed DVT was identified in the morbidly obese group (BMI 41). There were no significant differences in surgical site infections, blood transfusion requirements, or other patient-reported outcome measures at 42 days. Conclusion. Body mass index (BMI) did not affect the early post-operative outcome of hip replacements in patients enrolled in the ERP. Based on the evidence provided by this study, we would continue to offer hip replacement surgery irrespective of body mass index

Introduction. The obesity epidemic is a growing problem and must be considered with the projected increased demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Previous studies have reported increased complication rates after THA in the obese population, which has led to hesitation in offering surgery to this population. Moreover, some insurers are denying coverage for morbidly obese patients. While many consider obesity a “modifiable” risk factor, very few patients with advanced osteoarthritis have successfully lost substantial weight. The experience of centers that utilize systematic preoperative risk stratification tools and standardized postoperative total joint pathways may be underrepresented in prior studies. The aim of this study is to describe one surgeon's experience performing THA in morbidly and super-obese patient populations using an institutional preoperative Risk Stratification Tool (RST) and total joints pathway. Methods. We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing primary THA between May 2014 and December 2017 performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary care referral center. All patients were assessed preoperatively using an institutional RST and had a minimum of 90-day postoperative follow up. Patients were stratified by body mass index (BMI, kg/m. 2. ): non-obese (BMI < 30), obese (30–34), severely obese (35–39), morbidly obese (40–44), and super-obese (≥ 45). Primary outcomes were inpatient and 90-day complications. Continuous and binary parameters were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact tests. Logistic regression was additionally utilized to evaluate outcomes by BMI cohort. Results. A consecutive series of 368 patients met inclusion criteria across all BMI cohorts. There was significant variation with respect to age (P=0.001), BMI (P<0.001), diabetes (P=0.008), ASA class (P<0.001), and anesthesia type (P=0.003) (Table 1). Variation among BMI cohorts was also identified for several operative and postoperative parameters, including longer operative and in-room time and greater length of stay (P<0.001) (Table 2). Compared to non-obese patients, super-obese patients had 20.1 greater odds of return to OR within 90 days for superficial surgical site infection (SSI) or prolonged round drainage (P=0.008) (Table 3). Notably, morbidly and super-obese patients were not at significantly increased risk for inpatient intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, blood transfusion, 90-day emergency room visit, or 90-day readmission compared to their non-obese counterparts. For patients in whom 1-year follow-up was available, these differences between BMI cohorts remained insignificant. Conclusions. Patients with BMI>40 are more likely than non-obese patients to have increased postoperative rehabilitation needs but are not at increased risk for in-hospital complications. Super-obese patients have greater risk of superficial SSI or prolonged wound drainage than non-obese patients but are not at increased risk for revision or deep infection in any cohort. Use of a preoperative RST may help to mitigate postoperative complications and readmissions previously associated with morbid and super-obesity. We conclude that THA can be safely performed in super-obese patients and therefore care should not be denied to this population. Summary sentence. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be safely performed in morbidly and super-obese patients with the use of a preoperative risk stratification tool (RST) and total joints pathway. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Obesity has been associated with degenerative osteoarthritis of knee joint The over all incidence of osteoarthritis of the knee is also more in patients with obesity. Increasing obesity leads to faster progression of OA, which is due to increased joint load. Body mass index (BMI), dividing an individual’s weight (in kg) by his or her height (in square meters). BMI: Normal = 18.5 to 24.9, Overweight BMI −25–29.9 Obese=30 to 39.9, Morbidly Obese BMI 40 or Greater. Recent article focused on the thigh girth of obese patients and opined that if thigh girth > 55cms, subvastus approach should not be utilized, as it is difficult to evert the patella. We believed that obesity should not really cause a problem for the patients undergoing a TKA with the mini subvastus approach as the anatomy of the quadriceps in the obese and the non-obese patient population is the same. We decided to evert the patella only after osteotomy of tibia and the femur. All patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty with minisubvastus approach between January 2006 to July 2007 and who were obese (BMI> 30) were included in our study. Out of 425 primary Total knee arthroplasty were performed during this period. Out of these, there were total 97 obese patients with 109 knees which form the part of the study. There were 81 females and 16 males and 12 patients had staged bilateral knee arthroplasty. The weight varied from 63 to 125 kgs. 91 patients had varus deformity of < 15 degree, 15 patients had varus deformity of > 15 degree, 3 patients had valgus deformity. The thigh girth in obese group (BMI: 30–40) ranged from 45 to 58 cms with average of 50.17. The thigh girth in morbidly obese (BMI > 40) group ranged between 55 to 67 with average of 61.01 cms. Mini-subvastus approach provided satisfactory exposure in all knees that were operated. In no case was this approach abandoned. The average surgical time was 90 minutes with range. The average blood loss was 400 cc. The patellar tracking was immaculate in every case and in fact it was difficult to displace patella laterally after 30 degrees of knee flexion. Our 89 patients had flexion of > 120 0,and 20 patients had flexion of > 90 but < 120. The knee society score improved from average 42 (range 17–62) preoperatively to 89 (range 72–95) post operatively. The Knee Society functional score improved from 48 (range 15–60) pre operatively to 65 (range 50–80) post operatively. Mini subvastus approach offers adequate intraoperative exposure even in obese and morbidly obese patients. It did not result in increased complications in our hands even in morbidly obese patients with higher thigh girth. It is extremely patient friendly and its wider use is recommended

Introduction. In the lower extremity, lymphedema is characterized by fluid buildup and swelling which can lead to fibrosis of the skin and recurring soft-tissue infections. Risk factors include obesity, older age, lower extremity surgery, and radiotherapy. There is currently a paucity of data examining the impact of lymphedema in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to review outcomes following primary TKA performed in patients with lymphedema compared to a matched cohort with primary osteoarthritis. Methods. Over a 19-year period (1998–2016), 144 patients underwent primary TKA with a preceding diagnosis of ipsilateral lymphedema (Table 1). There were 114 (79%) females, a mean age of 69 years, and mean BMI of 37.1 kg/m2. Mean follow-up was 7-years (range 2–17 years). A blinded analyst completed a 1:2 match of patients with lymphedema to a group of patients without lymphedema undergoing primary TKA for osteoarthritis during the same period. Matching criteria included sex, age, date of surgery, and BMI. Matched controls included 228 (79%) females along with a mean age and BMI of 69 and 36.4 kg/m2. The mean follow-up for the comparison cohort was 8 years (range 2–18 years). There were no significant differences between groups on the evaluated baseline parameters. Results: Patients with a history of lymphedema were at a significantly increased risk of revision TKA (HR 7.60, P<0.001), reoperation for any cause (HR 2.87, P<0.001), and postoperative infection (HR 6.19, P<0.001). Patients with lymphedema were also at increased risk for periprosthetic fracture (p=0.04) and tibial component loosening (p=0.01). Morbid obesity increased the risk of reoperation (HR 2.11, p=0.02) and trended toward increased risk of revision TKA (HR 2.29, p=0.059) and infection (HR 2.37, p=0.06). Discussion: Patients with lymphedema are at significantly increased risk of revision, reoperation, and infection following primary TKA. This data highlights the need for appropriate patient counseling in this population and optimization of lymphedema management before and after TKA. Results. Patients with a history of lymphedema were at a significantly increased risk of revision TKA (HR 7.60, P<0.001), reoperation for any cause (HR 2.87, P<0.001), and postoperative infection (HR 6.19, P<0.001). Patients with lymphedema were also at increased risk for periprosthetic fracture (p=0.04) and tibial component loosening (p=0.01). Morbid obesity increased the risk of reoperation (HR 2.11, p=0.02) and trended toward increased risk of revision TKA (HR 2.29, p=0.059) and infection (HR 2.37, p=0.06). Discussion. Patients with lymphedema are at significantly increased risk of revision, reoperation, and infection following primary TKA. This data highlights the need for appropriate patient counseling in this population and optimization of lymphedema management before and after TKA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. At a time when many surgeons are reluctant to perform a unilateral TKA in the obese patient, little is written on the safety and efficacy of bilateral simultaneous TKA in this same patient population. While these potential benefits are attractive to patients, surgeons may be hesitant to perform bilateral TKA due to the greater physical demand placed on the patient, and a potential increase in postoperative complication. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the impact of obesity on clinical outcomes and complication rates of patients undergoing bilateral TKA under one anesthetic. Materials and Methods. The clinical outcomes of 133 patients (266 knees) who underwent bilateral TKA between 2013 and 2016 were reviewed. The procedures were performed by three separate surgeons across three major academic institutions. ASA scores, tourniquet time, operative time, blood loss, length of stay, readmission, and postoperative complications were compared between different BMI categories of less than 30 kg/ m2, 30–34.99 kg/ m2, 35–39.99 kg/ m2and above 40 kg/ m2. Results. There were 83 females and 50 males who underwent bilateral TKA identified, with an average age of 60.17 years. The average LOS was 5 days and there was no significant impact of BMI on the length of stay or blood loss. 31 out of 133 patients experienced either a minor or major complication postoperatively (Table 1). Obese patients experienced more complications than non-obese patients. Specifically, patients identified as morbidly obese experienced a complication rate of 44.4%. This was significantly higher than the complication rate in the non-obese (less than 30 kg/ m2) patient cohort, 20.8% (p=.034). Of the 31 complications, 10 patients required a return to the operating room for a manipulation under anesthesia. There was no significant difference in the manipulation rate for the obese and non-obese patient. As BMI increased; postoperative ROM displayed a trend in the negative direction (Table 2). On average, obese patients had significantly higher ASA scores, with only 13.8% of patients with a BMI below 30 assigned an ASA score of 3 in comparison to 50% of patients with a BMI of 40 and above (p= .013) (Table 3). Higher BMI was significantly correlated with longer operative times (p=.002). Conclusion. Similar to numerous unilateral TKA studies in the obese patient, greater complication rates in the obese patient population were noted. The majority of complications that occurred within the time of this study were minor and did not affect the outcome of the procedure. Surgeons should carefully analyze the comorbidities of patients with a BMI above 40 kg/m2 such as cardiac history, diabetes mellitus, and smoking status when considering operating on morbidly obese patients and take steps to address these comorbidities and maximize the patient prior to surgery. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

There has been considerable discussion as to the influence of obesity on the indications for, and the outcome after, joint replacement. Attempts have been made to withhold funding for such procedures in those who are overweight. What is the justification for this? This editorial examines the current evidence concerning the influence of obesity on joint replacement and suggests that it is only in the morbidly obese, with a body mass index > 40 kg/m. 2. , that significant contraindications to operation are present

We audited the relationship between obesity and the age at which hip and knee replacement was undertaken at our centre. The database was analysed for age, the Oxford hip or knee score and the body mass index (BMI) at the time of surgery. In total, 1369 patients were studied, 1025 treated by hip replacement and 344 by knee replacement. The patients were divided into five groups based on their BMI (normal, overweight, moderately obese, severely obese and morbidly obese). The difference in the mean Oxford score at surgery was not statistically significant between the groups (p > 0.05). For those undergoing hip replacement, the mean age of the morbidly obese patients was ten years less than that of those with a normal BMI. For those treated by knee replacement, the difference was 13 years. The age at surgery fell significantly for those with a BMI > 35 kg/m. 2. for both hip and knee replacement (p > 0.05). This association was stronger for patients treated by knee than by hip replacement

Introduction: The variability of clinical results and the complexity and cost of total knee replacement (TKR) require efficacy assessments and the determination of prognostic factors with the aim of optimizing this procedure. Purpose:. Study of the evolution at 36 months of health-related quality of life (HRQofL) in patients with significant knee arthritis that undergo TKR and. Identification of social, demographic and clinical variables that affect HRQofL. Materials and methods: This is a three-year prospective study. HRQofL was assessed by means of a specific WOMAC questionnaire. An assessment was made of the following: sociodemographic characteristics of the population, their knee arthritis, intraoperative parameters, complexity of the operation and immediate and late postoperative complications. The statistical study was performed using linear regression models. During the preoperative period 90 patients were included. Results: On assessment at 3 years we were able to assess 67 patients (54 were women); mean age: 74.83, SD 5.57. Pre-postoperative evolution determined by the specific HRQofL questionnaire shows significant differences in improvement at 3 years. Non-knee-arthritis related pain has been associated with worse results in the different WOMAC dimensions (pain, stiffness and function). Morbid obesity (IMC & #8805;38) was significantly associated with severe pain. Conclusions: In patients with severe gonarthrosis that undergo TKR, HRQofL has improved when assessment is performed 3 years later. No significant differences are found between intra and postoperative variables in the evolution of HRQofL. The presence of non-gonarthrosis related chronic pain and morbid obesity are negative factors in postoperative WOMAC assessment

Aim: To determine the epidemiology of total knee replacement in our hospital over two 12 month periods 5 years apart to see if patient BMI and demographics have changed. Methods: Hospital theatre log books were examined to determine all primary total knee replacements carried out in our hospital during May 2000 – April 2001 and May 2005 – April 2006. Patient notes were examined and the following details were recorded: age, sex and BMI. Data was recorded on an excel spreadsheet. Results: There was a significant increase in the number of patients undergoing TKR in the 2005 – 2006 time period despite no change in population served (100 vs 228, p< 0.0001). This is also a higher than expected increase in TKR surgery when compared to the national data from the arthroplasty register. There was no significant change in the age of patients undergoing TKR. There was a significant increase in the average BMI of female patients 30.2+\−5.33 vs 32 +\− 6.98 (p=0.03) but no significant difference in the BMI of males. There was also a significant increase in the number of female patients with morbid obesity (BMI> 40) 3\64 vs 19/153 p=0.047. It would appear that there has been a significant increase in the demand for TKR over a relatively short time period and that there are approximately twice as many women needing TKR than men. Within the females there has been a significant increase in BMI and also a significant increase in those who are morbidly obese undergoing TKR. This data helps predict future demand for both primary and revision arthroplasty services in our hospital