Introduction. Pressure to control health care costs may limit the ability of new implants to enter the market. Customized individually made (CIM) knee implants are produced from CT scans of each patient and may result in improved clinical outcomes based on early data showing less blood loss, reduced bone resection, and better implant function and alignment. Limited economic evidence suggests that the use of CIM technology may result in cost savings, particularly when post-discharge expenses are included. The purpose of this study was to evaluate real-world cost data to determine episode spending in a Medicare population receiving either CIM or off-the-shelf (OTS) implants. Methods. The Yale Center for Musculoskeletal Care and Baker Tilly Healthcare Management reviewed episode expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries who received CIM and OTS implants for TKA between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2015. Episode costs included the pre-operative CT scan, index TKA procedure, and 12-month post-index spending for inpatient (IP), outpatient (OP), emergency room (ER), skilled nursing facility (SNF), and home health (HH) services. CIM patients were identified through a matching process utilizing de-identified patient demographic and procedural information and the presence of a CT scan 28–365 days before index. OTS patients included those without a CT scan within one year of index. CIM and OTS cohorts were propensity matched to produce comparable cohorts at a one-to-five ratio based on age range, gender, race, geographical location, and comorbidities. Average expenditure was used to calculate one-year costs of care differences between the CIM and the OTS technologies. A Generalized Linear Model (GLM) and two-part model (logistics and GLM) were used to test statistical significance. Results. The study included 4,434 patients (CIM: 739, OTS: 3,695). CIM index hospital expenses were 6.5% less than OTS (CIM: $11,579; OTS: $12,386, p<0.0001). CIM patients were 37.5% less likely to incur SNF costs than OTS patients (CIM: 3.0% vs. OTS: 4.8%; p=0.0241) and had 45.1% lower average SNF expenditures (CIM: $8,882 vs. OTS: $16,183; p=0.0236). There was no difference in the probability of incurring post-index IP costs (CIM: 15.7% vs. OTS: 15.4%; p=0.9437) but average post-index IP expenditures were 27.2% lower among the CIM cohort than OTS (CIM: $12,817 vs. OTS: $17,605; p=0.0008). However, CIM patients were 10.5% more likely to incur OP costs (CIM: 90.9% vs. OTS: 85.7%; p=0.0005) and had 6.1% higher average OP expenditures (CIM: $2,328 vs. OTS: $2,106; p=0.0377). Average 12-month episode spending for the CIM cohort was 8.4% less than the OTS cohort ($1,697 Difference; CIM: $18,585 vs. OTS: $20,280; p<0.0001). Conclusion. Study findings demonstrate that the use of CIM technology can result in significant 12-month episode savings among a Medicare population. The average expenditure differences noted for post-index IP, SNF, and OP cost categories suggest there are differences in required post-operative treatment across the two cohorts. Savings calculated in the analysis is a meaningful reduction for payers. Providers may also benefit from index and episode cost savings through shared savings arrangements. CIM technology should be considered as a method to reduce TKA episode spending

Background. Routine closed suction drainage and postoperative laboratory studies have long been tenets of most TJA protocols. However, recent literature has called into question whether either is necessary with modern outpatient TJA clinical pathways. Methods. Demographic, cost, and readmission data for 2,605 primary unilateral TJA cases was collected retrospectively and analyzed prior to and after a protocol change where routine closed suction drains and postoperative laboratory tests were eliminated. This protocol change was designed to treat all primary TJA like outpatients regardless of their admission status. Drain usage changed from routine to selective based on hemostasis. Lab studies changed from routine to selective for patients on warfarin for VTE prophylaxis (INR), with ASA 4 or 5 status (BMP), and with a hematocrit < 27% in the recovery room after THA (CBC). Results. Drain utilization decreased by 50% and postoperative labs decreased by 70%. Drain and lab test cost per patient decreased from $74.62 before to $19.91 after the change, while charges per patient decreased from $625.23 before to $77.15 after. The 30 and 90-day readmission rates decreased with no readmissions occurring before or after the change that could have been prevented by using a drain or obtaining labs. Conclusion. Selective elimination of routine closed suction drainage and postoperative laboratory studies as part of an outpatient TJA protocol is safe and provides cost savings for inpatient primary TJA. Per 100 cases, this change could decrease institution costs by $5,500 and patient charges by $55,000 without decreasing quality or safety

In 2000 our emergency department implemented a new management for the treatment of isolated, apex volar distal radial fractures involving immobilisation with a wrist splint, written information for carers and no planned follow up. Next day x-ray review acted as a safety net for misdiagnosed or less stable fractures. This has now been validated with a retrospective review of treatment for distal radial # within the ED. Patients were identified through the Emergency department’s electronic discharge record. Over a 9 month period 260 patients were identified with metaphyseal distal radial and/or ulna injuries to which a non orthopaedic junior doctor might be expected to apply the Buckle Fracture Algorithm. Of these 161 had isolated distal radial fractures suitable for treatment with a wrist splint. 118 were correctly identified and treated in the ED. 43 patients were sent to # clinic, of these 11 patients were discharged at the 1st visit, however 3 had 3 or more visits and 2 children had additional x-rays. Over this period 9 children were given splints inappropriately according to the protocol, most of these had stable injuries on reviewing the x-rays, 3 were identified and recalled for a cast. None of the children with injuries outside the protocol who were not recalled had an unplanned return with complications. Taking into account only those children who were correctly managed from the ED the estimated annual cost savings to the NHS for this hospital for this period is £40,784, compared to standard treatment before introduction of this protocol. If all children had been treated according to protocol the estimated cost savings would be £56096/yr

The Dawn Hip - An Effective Strategy to Improve the Management of Traumatic Hip Fractures. Introduction. Traumatic hip fractures are managed with nationwide standards, and are regularly audited and published. A previous audit last year at the William Harvey revealed 66% of hip fractures were operated within 48 hours, compared to the national average of 75%. We implemented a strategy to improve this target by introducing the ‘Dawn Hip’ - a hip fracture operation which is prepared for surgery at 8am on the Emergency (CEPOD) list. Methods. Over a two month period after the introduction of the ‘Dawn hip’, the number of hip operations and start time on the CEPOD list were audited. Performance data were extrapolated from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) and compared nationally. Results. Three months prior to the ‘Dawn hip’ the mean start time of surgery on the CEPOD list was 9.50am. Two months since the introduction of the dawn hip, 67% of all trauma hip operations were done on the CEPOD list. The mean start time of the CEPOD list improved to 8.38am. Data from the NHFD revealed 81% of traumatic hip fractures were operated on within 48 hours, with the national average being 80%. Conclusion. This is an effective strategy which increases efficiency of existing resources and improves hospital services and patient care. It requires a multidisciplinary approach and participation from both managerial and clinical departments. This strategy not only optimises the care we provide for hip fractures, but also increases trauma list space for other pending trauma operations. By meeting nationwide targets, the trust is rewarded with cash incentives, which is used to further improve services. In the current economic climate, this represents a method of optimising healthcare, increasing cost savings and maximising productivity and efficiency

The debate whether to use cemented or uncemented components in primary total hip replacement (THR) has not yet been considered with reference to the cost implications to the National Health Service.

We obtained the number of cemented and uncemented components implanted in 2009 from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. The cost of each component was established. The initial financial saving if all were cemented was then calculated. Subsequently the five-year rates of revision for each type of component were reviewed and the predicted number of revisions at five years for the actual components used was compared with the predicted number of revisions for a cemented THR. This was then multiplied by the mean cost of revision surgery to provide an indication of the savings over the first five years if all primary THRs were cemented.

The saving at primary THR was calculated to be £10 million with an additional saving during the first five years of between £5 million and £8.5 million. The use of cemented components in routine primary THR in the NHS as a whole can be justified on a financial level but we recognise individual patient factors must be considered when deciding which components to use.

Purpose Of The Study: To compare the Coblation technology Vs standard diathermy regarding surgical time & cost in arthroscopic subacromial decompression.

Methods & Results: This prospective randomized comparative study between Coblation technology Vs standard monopolar diathermy in ASD. 40 patients with chronic impingement syndrome prospectively randomized 20 patients in each group. Procedure time & cost per case were accurately calculated. Results show that the Coblation group had an average 8 minutes shorter procedure time per case P value: 0.0001. The cost saving as a result was about £64 per case P value: 0.01

Conclusion: Use of Coblation technology for soft tissue debridement & resection in ASD reduces procedure time by 38% and the cost by an average of 18% per case (£64) compared with the use of a shaver and diathermy probe.

Aims

Implant waste during total hip arthroplasty (THA) represents a significant cost to the USA healthcare system. While studies have explored methods to improve THA cost-effectiveness, the literature comparing the proportions of implant waste by intraoperative technology used during THA is limited. The aims of this study were to: 1) examine whether the use of enabling technologies during THA results in a smaller proportion of wasted implants compared to navigation-guided and conventional manual THA; 2) determine the proportion of wasted implants by implant type; and 3) examine the effects of surgeon experience on rates of implant waste by technology used.

In the current healthcare environment, cost containment has become more important than ever. Perioperative services are often scrutinized as they consume more than 30% of North American hospitals’ budgets. The procurement, processing, and use of sterile surgical inventory is a major component of the perioperative care budget and has been recognized as an area of operational inefficiency. Although a recent systematic review supported the optimization of surgical inventory reprocessing as a means to increase efficiency and eliminate waste, there is a paucity of data on how to actually implement this change. A well-studied and established approach to implementing organizational change is Kotter's Change Model (KCM). The KCM process posits that organizational change can be facilitated by a dynamic 8-step approach and has been increasingly applied to the healthcare setting to facilitate the implementation of quality improvement (QI) interventions. We performed an inventory optimization (IO) to improve inventory and instrument reprocessing efficiency for the purpose of cost containment using the KCM framework. The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to implement the IO using KCM, overcome organizational barriers to change, and measure key outcome metrics related to surgical inventory and corresponding clinician satisfaction. We hypothesized that the KCM would be an effective method of implementing the IO. This study was conducted at a tertiary academic hospital across the four highest-volume surgical services - Orthopedics, Otolaryngology, General Surgery, and Gynecology. The IO was implemented using the steps outlined by KCM (Figure 1): 1) create coalition, 2) create vision for change, 3) establish urgency, 4) communicate the vision, 5) empower broad based action, 6) generate general short term wins, 7) consolidate gains, and 8) anchor change. This process was evaluated using inventory metrics - total inventory reduction and depreciation cost savings; operational efficiency metrics - reprocessing labor efficiency and case cancellation rate; and clinician satisfaction. The implementation of KCM is described in Table 1. Total inventory was reduced by 37.7% with an average tray size reduction of 18.0%. This led to a total reprocessing time savings of 1333 hours per annum and labour cost savings of $39 995 per annum. Depreciation cost savings was $64 320 per annum. Case cancellation rate due to instrument-related errors decreased from 3.9% to 0.2%. The proportion of staff completely satisfied with the inventory was 1.7% pre-IO and 80% post-IO. This was the first study to show the success of applying KCM to facilitate change in the perioperative setting with respect to surgical inventory. We have outlined the important organizational obstacles faced when making changes to surgical inventory. The same KCM protocol can be followed for optimization processes for disposable versus reusable surgical device purchasing or perioperative scheduling. Although increasing efforts are being dedicated to quality improvement and efficiency, institutions will need an organized and systematic approach such as the KCM to successfully enact changes. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. Virtual fracture clinics (VFC's) aim to reduce the number of outpatient appointments while improving the clinical effectiveness and patients experience through standardisation of treatment pathways. With 4.6% of ED admissions due to trauma the VFC prevents unnecessary face to face appointments providing a cost savings benefit to the NHS. Methods. This project demonstrates the importance of efficient VFC process in reducing the burden on the fracture clinics. We completed preformed a retrospective cross-sectional study, analysing two cycles in May (n=305) and September (n=332) 2021. We reviewed all VFC referrals during this time assessing the quality of the referral, if they went on to require a face to face follow up and who the referring health care professional was. Following the cycle in May we provided ongoing education to A&E staff before re-auditing in September. Results. Between the two cycles there was an average 19% improvement in quality of the referrals, significant reduction in number of inappropriate referrals for soft tissue knee and shoulder injuries from 15.1% (n=50) to 4.5% (n=15) following our intervention. There was an 8% increase in number of fracture clinic appointments to 74.4% (n=247), primarily due to an increase number of referrals from nurse practitioners. Radial head fractures were targeted as one group that were able to be successfully managed in VFC, despite this 64% (n=27) of patients were still seen in the outpatient department following VFC referral. Conclusion. Despite the decrease in the number of inappropriate referrals, and the increase in quality of referrals following our intervention. The percentage of VFC referrals in CAVUHB is still higher than other centres in with established VFCs in England. This possibly highlights the need for further education to emergency staff around describing what injuries are appropriate for referral, specifically soft tissue injuries and radial head fractures. In order to optimise the VFC process and provide further cost savings benefits while reducing the strain on fracture clinics

Is Non-Weight-Bearing Necessary? (INWN) is a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing immediate protected weight-bearing (IWB) with non-weight-bearing cast immobilisation (NWB) following ankle fracture fixation (ORIF). This trial compares; functional outcomes, complication rates and performs an economic analysis to estimate cost-utility. IWB within 24hrs was compared to NWB, following ORIF of all types of unstable ankle fractures. Skeletally immature patients and tibial plafond fractures were excluded. Functional outcomes were assessed by the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and RAND-36 Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) taken at regular follow-up intervals up to one year. A cost-utility analysis via decision tree modelling was performed to derive an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). A standard gamble health state valuation model utilising SF-36 scores was used to calculate Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) for each arm. We recruited 160 patients (80 per arm), aged 15 to 94 years (M = 45.5), 54% female. Complication rates were similar in both groups. IWB demonstrated a consistently higher OMAS score, with significant values at 6 weeks (MD=10.4, p=0.005) and 3 months (MD 12.0, p=0.003). Standard gamble utility values demonstrated consistently higher values (a score of 1 equals perfect health) with IWB, significant at 3 months (Ẋ = 0.75 [IWB] / 0.69 [NWB], p=0.018). Cost-utility analysis demonstrated NWB is €798.02 more expensive and results in 0.04 fewer QALYs over 1 year. This results in an ICER of −€21,682.42/QALY. This negative ICER indicates cost savings of €21,682.42 for every QALY (25 patients = 1 QALY gain) gained implementing an IWB regime. IWB demonstrates a superior functional outcome, greater cost savings and similar complication rates, compared to NWB following ankle fracture fixation

Aims. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is now commonly used in major surgical operations including orthopaedics. The TRAC-24 randomized control trial (RCT) aimed to assess if an additional 24 hours of TXA postoperatively in primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reduced blood loss. Contrary to other orthopaedic studies to date, this trial included high-risk patients. This paper presents the results of a cost analysis undertaken alongside this RCT. Methods. TRAC-24 was a prospective RCT on patients undergoing TKA and THA. Three groups were included: Group 1 received 1 g intravenous (IV) TXA perioperatively and an additional 24-hour postoperative oral regime, Group 2 received only the perioperative dose, and Group 3 did not receive TXA. Cost analysis was performed out to day 90. Results. Group 1 was associated with the lowest mean total costs, followed by Group 2 and then Group 3. The differences between Groups 1 and 3 (-£797.77 (95% confidence interval -1,478.22 to -117.32) were statistically significant. Extended oral dosing reduced costs for patients undergoing THA but not TKA. The reduced costs in Groups 1 and 2 resulted from reduced length of stay, readmission rates, emergency department attendances, and blood transfusions. Conclusion. This study demonstrated significant cost savings when using TXA in primary THA or TKA. Extended oral dosing reduced costs further in THA but not TKA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):536–542

Knee arthroscopy with meniscectomy is the third most common Orthopaedic surgery performed after TKA and THA, comprising up to 16.6% of all procedures. The efficiency of Orthopaedic care delivery with respect to waiting times and systemic costs is extremely concerning. Canadian Orthopaedic patients experience the longest wait times of any G7 country, yet perioperative surgical care constitutes a significant portion of a hospital's budget. In-Office Needle Arthroscopy (IONA) is an emerging technology that has been primarily studied as a diagnostic tool. Recent evidence shows that it is a cost-effective alternative to hospital- and community-based MRI with comparable accuracy. Recent procedure guides detailing IONA medial meniscectomy suggest a potential node for OR diversion. Given the high case volume of knee arthroscopy as well as the potential amenability to be diverted away from the OR to the office setting, IONA has the potential to generate considerable improvements in healthcare system efficiency with respect to throughput and cost savings. As such, the purpose of this study is to investigate the cost savings and impact on waiting times on a mid-sized Canadian community hospital if IONA is offered as an alternative to traditional operating room (OR) arthroscopy for medial meniscal tears. In order to develop a comprehensive understanding and accurate representation of the quantifiable operations involved in the current state for medial meniscus tear care, process mapping was performed that describes the journey of a patient from when they present with knee pain to their general practitioner until case resolution. This technique was then repeated to create a second process map describing the hypothetical proposed state whereby OR diversion may be conducted utilizing IONA. Once the respective process maps for each state were determined, each process map was translated into a Dupont decision tree. In order to accurately determine the total number of patients which would be eligible for this care pathway at our institution, the OR booking scheduling for arthroscopy and meniscectomy/repair over a four year time period (2016-2020) were reviewed. A sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the effect of the number of patients who select IONA over meniscectomy and the number of revision meniscectomies after IONA on 1) the profit and profit margin determined by the MCS-Dupont financial model and 2) the throughput (percentage and number) determined by the MCS-throughput model. Based on historic data at our institution, an average of 198 patients (SD 31) underwent either a meniscectomy or repair from years 2016-2020. Revenue for both states was similar (p = .22), with the current state revenue being $ 248,555.99 (standard deviation $ 39,005.43) and proposed state of $ 249,223.86 (SD $ 39,188.73). However, the reduction in expenses was significant (p < .0001) at 5.15%, with expenses in the current state being $ 281,415.23 (SD $ 44,157.80) and proposed state of $ 266,912.68 (SD $ 42,093.19), representing $14,502.95 in savings. Accordingly, profit improvement was also significant (p < .0001) at 46.2%, with current state profit being $ (32,859.24) (SD $ 5,153.49) and proposed state being $ (17,678.82) (SD $ 2,921.28). The addition of IONA into the care pathway of the proposed state produced an average improvement in throughput of 42 patients (SD 7), representing a 21.2% reduction in the number of patients that require an OR procedure. Financial sensitivity analysis revealed that the proposed state profit was higher than the current state profit if as few as 10% of patients select IONA, with the maximum revision rate needing to remain below 40% to achieve improved profits. The most important finding from this study is that IONA is a cost-effective alternative to traditional surgical arthroscopy for medial meniscus meniscectomy. Importantly, IONA can also be used as a diagnostic procedure. It is shown to be a cost-effective alternative to MRI with similar diagnostic accuracy. The role of IONA as a joint diagnostic-therapeutic tool could positively impact MRI waiting times and MRI/MRA costs, and further reduce indirect costs to society. Given the well-established benefit of early meniscus treatment, accelerating both diagnosis and therapy is bound to result in positive effects

Abstract. Objectives. To analyse the costs and benefits of sending femoral head specimens for histopathological analysis and whether our practice had changed since the original study five years ago. Methods. The cohort definition was patients who had both undergone hip hemiarthroplasties (HHAs) and had femoral head specimens sent for histopathological analysis at our tertiary care institution from 2013 to 2016. Retrospective review of clinical and electronic notes was performed on these patients for history of malignancy, histopathological diagnosis of femoral head, indication for histopathological examination and radiological studies. The total number of HHAs performed at the centre and the costs involved in analysing each femoral head specimen were identified. Results. A total of 805 HHAs were performed at the centre. We identified 56 femoral head specimens from 56 patients (6.96%) that were sent for histopathological analysis after HHA. 29 patients (51.79%) had a known history of malignancy. Three femoral head specimens (10.34%) were histologically positive for malignancy. Two patients had hip radiographs demonstrating metastasis to the femoral head. The third patient had a PET-CT scan two weeks prior to fracture that did not show signs of metastatic disease. 27 patients (48.21%) had no history of malignancy. None of their femoral head specimens were found to be histologically positive for malignancy. 10 patients had no appropriate indication for histopathological analysis. The cost savings for 27 patients with no previous history of malignancy ranged from €2,295 to €9,504. The cost savings for 10 patients with no appropriate indication ranged from €850 to €3,520. Conclusions. Histopathological analysis of femoral head specimens after HHA has little benefit for patients without a history of malignancy. The practice at our institution had not changed significantly in the past five years. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective procedure to improve the quality of life in patients with advanced osteoarthritis. The number of these procedures are expected to grow 174% by 2030. This growth rate is expected to economically strain the health care system. A potential solution to alleviate this problem is the utilization of single use instruments (SUI). Potential advantages of SUI include: improved operating room efficiencies, decreased costs associated with traditional instrument management (sterile processing, shipping), and decreased infection risk. The present study examines the clinical results of SUI compared to standard instrumentation. Furthermore, economic modeling is performed to examine the cost savings that is potentially realized with their use. Materials and Methods. 51 patients receiving a TKA with use of SUI were prospectively compared to 49 patients utilizing standard instrumentation. Knee Society Scores and Radiographic alignment will be evaluated. Adverse events will be recorded. Economic modeling of SUI will be performed in 4 different areas: 1. Decreased infection burden; 2. Operating room logistics; 3. Sterile processing savings; and 4. Instrument logistical savings. Results. The average Pre-operative KSS (Objective/Functional) scores were 48.7/41.6 for the SIU patients compared to 50.2/38.7 for the standard instrumentation patients. Post-operative improvements measured 84.0/72.8 and 83.9/76.4 for the 2 groups respectively. The Pre-operative Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle was 176.2 and 177.0 for the 2 groups. The SUI HKA improved to 179.3 while the standard improved to 178.9. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups. Furthermore, there were no cases of subsidence, migration, loosening, or infection in either group. There were no SUI procedure abandonments. Economic analysis revealed a decreased risk of Infection burden of $28.08/case. Operating room efficiencies include reduced set-up/take-down time and case efficiency savings/case. This averages $348.14/case. Instrument sterilization savings occur by bypassing the central sterile-processing department completely and models to $700/case. Finally, instrument logistics savings include time and money spent organizing/turning over/shipping instrument sets for cases. This estimate is $112.88/case for a total economic value of $1, 189.10/case. Discussion. In summary, the present study confirms that SUI provides similar clinical and radiographic results to standard instrumentation for TKA. Furthermore, SUI offers significant cost savings/case via potential benefits of reduced risk of infection, increased operating room productivity, and significant tray sterilization and loaner instrumentation cost savings

Closed ankle fractures have been reported to account for 10% off all fractures presenting to the Emergency Department. Many of these injuries require acute surgical management either via direct admission or through defined outpatient surgical pathways. While both methods have been shown to be safe, few studies have examined the cost effectiveness of each clinical scenario. The purpose of this study is to compare cost and resource utilization associated with inpatient and outpatient ankle fracture surgery at a Canadian academic institution. This is a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent acute ankle fracture surgery at London Health Sciences Centre between 2016 and 2018. Thirty patients who underwent inpatient ankle surgery for closed, isolated ankle fractures at University Hospital were compared to 30 consecutive patients who underwent outpatient ankle surgery for similar fractures at Victoria hospital. Data pertaining to age at time of surgery, sex, BMI, fracture type, operating/recovery room time, and length of hospital stay were collected. All emergency room visits, readmissions and complications within 30 days of surgery were also recorded. Inpatient and outpatient cohorts were similar with respect to average age (48 vs. 44, P=0.326) and body mass index (29.8 vs. 29.1, P=0.741). There was a greater proportion of patients with an American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) Classification of 3 or greater in the inpatient surgery group (48% vs. 23%). The inpatient group spent an average of 1.2 days in hospital while waiting for surgery and a average of 72 hours in hospital for their entire surgical encounter. The outpatient group spent an average of eight days (at home) waiting for surgery while spending an average of 7.4 hours in hospital during their entire surgical encounter. Outpatient ankle fracture surgery was associated with a cost savings of 35.9% in comparison to inpatient ankle fracture surgery (P < 0 .001). There were no significant differences in the rates of emergency room visits, readmissions, or complications between cohorts. Preliminary findings suggest that outpatient ankle fracture surgery is appropriate for most patients, requires less hospital resources and is associated with similar rates of readmission and complications as inpatient surgery. An established outpatient surgical pathway may offer significant cost savings in the treatment of the common closed ankle fracture that requires surgical intervention

Abstract. Introduction. Uni-compartmental knee replacement (UKR) has become popularised due to quicker recovery times, reduced postoperative pain, and blood loss. The desire to increase bed capacity and reduce costs, while preserving safety and patient satisfaction, has led to increased interest in day-case arthroplasty. This study observes the feasibility of UKR as a day-case procedure and whether this affects short and long-term postoperative outcomes. Methodology. Between 2018 and 2021, at a single institution and operated by a single orthopaedic surgeon, seventy-seven patients received a UKR on an elective basis. The patients were divided into two groups: ‘day-case’ for those discharged on the same day, and ‘non day-case’ group. Results. 31 patients were identified as day case procedures with the remaining 46 requiring between one to three days before discharge. Mean age, sex, modal ASA score, BMI, Charlson co-morbidity index, and pre-op oxford knee score showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). No significant difference between the post-op oxford knee score at 1 year was found for patients treated and discharged as a day case procedure (37.8 +/− 6.88) and those who remained as an inpatient postoperatively (37.8 +/− 10.7); t(df) = −0.0007, p=0.994. No patients in either group suffered any complications beyond the peri-operative period. 30-day and 90-day readmission rates were equal. Conclusions. With no significant differences in post-op knee scores, complication, and readmission rates, we feel UKR can be performed as a viable day case procedure in a planned elective setting. This will result in significant cost savings

Patients awaiting resolution of swelling and oedema prior to ankle surgery can represent a significant burden on hospital beds. Our study assessed whether external pneumatic intermittent compression (EPIC) can reduce delays to surgery. Our prospective randomised controlled trial (n= 20) compared outcomes of patients treated with EPIC vs control group managed with ice and elevation. Included were patients aged <18 years with isolated closed ankle fractures admitted for management of swelling prior to surgery. Excluded were open fractures, injuries to contralateral leg, diabetes, absent pulses, peripheral vascular disease, inability to consent, no requirement for admission. Eligible patients were randomised to active or control arms. All patients were managed initially with reduction and back slab application. Patients in active arm fitted with EPIC (Hydroven 3000) device over the back slab. Assessment by treating team determined the time at which patient is assessed ready for surgery. Patients in the treatment arm were assessed as ready for surgery sooner, (123 hrs vs 168hrs, T score = 1.925, P 0.035) and had a shorter time to surgery (167 hrs vs 216 hrs, T score = 1.748, P 0.047) Length of stay was reduced bud did not reach statistical significance. (259 hrs vs 269 hrs, T score 0.229, P 0.41). Our results showed a statistically and clinically significant reduction in time that patients were assessed ready for surgery and time to surgery in the treatment cohort. We conclude that although further data is needed to achieve an adequately powered study and assess the safety profile of the EPIC, incorporation of EPIC into routine clinical practice has the potential for significant cost savings

The recruitment drive, investment and collaboration within Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (BCUHB) sites providing specialist lower limb arthroplasty and trauma service has evolved over last few years with aims to improve patient care and reduce reliance on tertiary referral centres. Through our service-evaluation project, we reviewed the results of treatment provided for periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFs) presenting to BCUHB sites over last 4 years. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive PPFFs admitted at three BCUHB sites from January’20 to June’23 with mean follow-up of 20.8 ± 13.2 (8–49) months [n=161; Mean age: 82.2 ± 8.5 (59–101) years, Females:107]. Over the review period we noted a 23% increase in service demand for care of PPFFs. Majority were managed surgically [132/161] [38 revision arthroplasties; 94 ORIFs] at BCUHB sites and two patients were referred to tertiary centre. Average time to surgery was 3.5 days. 90% of the PPFFs were managed successfully with 10% (16/159) having orthopaedic complications needing further intervention. 6.3 (10/159) had medical complications and did not need orthopaedic re-intervention. In our series, 12-month re-operation rate was 6.1% (8/132) and 1-month, 3-month and 1-year mortality rate was 6.3%, 11.3% and 21.4% respectively. These results are comparable to the published results of PPFF management at tertiary centres. Potential cost savings compared to transfer to tertiary centre for PPFF management was £2.31 million. Thus, it is possible to successfully provide adequate care for PPFFs at DGHs and efforts should be made to appropriately equip and adequately staff DGHs, to provide service for local PPFF care

Percutaneous flexor tenotomy involves cutting the flexor digitorum tendons to correct claw toe deformity to treat apical pressure areas and prevent subsequent infection in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Performing this under ultrasound guidance provides reassurance of complete release of the tendon and increases procedural safety. This study is a retrospective case series evaluating the effectiveness, safety, and patient satisfaction of performing percutaneous ultrasound-guided flexor tenotomy in an outpatient setting. People with loss of protective sensation, a digital flexion deformity, and an apical toe ulcer or pre-ulcerative lesion who presented to our institution between December 2019 and June 2022 were included in this study. Participants were followed-up at a minimum of 3 months. Time to ulcer healing, re-ulceration rate, patient satisfaction, and complications were recorded. An Australian cost analysis was performed comparing this procedure performed in rooms versus theatres. There were 28 ulcers and 41 pre-ulcerative lesions. A total of 69 tenotomy procedures were performed on 38 patients across 52 episodes of care. The mean time to ulcer healing was 22.5 +/- 6.4 days. There were 2 cases of re-ulceration. 1 patient sustained a transfer lesion. There were four toes that went onto require amputation, all in the setting of pre-existing osteomyelitis. 94% of patients strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the outcome of the procedure. Costs saved were estimated to be $1426. Flexor tenotomy is a minimally invasive procedure that can be performed in the outpatient setting, and therefore without delay to treatment, reducing risk of ulcer progression and need for subsequent amputation. This is the first study to report on flexor tenotomy under ultrasound-guidance. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous flexor tenotomy is safe and effective, with high patient satisfaction and low recurrence rates. This performance in the outpatient setting ensures significant time and cost savings for both the practitioner and patient

We report the impact of implementing a new short-stay hip and knee arthroplasty pathway in a National Health Service (NHS) hospital. This was enacted due to existing concerns with a long length of stay (LOS) and reduced elective operating capacity each winter due to emergency bed pressures. The overnight introduction of this pathway was aimed to reduce LOS, alleviate bed pressures, minimise readmission rates and generate financial savings, all combining to facilitate full elective activity during the winter. We conducted a prospective study at a regional tertiary arthroplasty centre. The new pathway was introduced across the service overnight. It includes rigorous preoperative optimisation, specific anaesthetic protocols and uniform changes in surgical practice to allow a focus on early mobilization and discharge on the day of surgery where possible. Data collection spanned 17 months, including the initial six months post implementation of the short-stay pathway. LOS data was collected for the full period and data was compared pre- and post-implementation of the new pathway. Patient satisfaction and 30-day readmission data were also collected. There was an immediate and significant decrease in median LOS from 4 days pre-implementation to 1 day post-implementation. Patient satisfaction was high, and the 30-day readmission rate was unchanged (5.95%), with no readmissions directly related to decreased inpatient stay. Financial analyses revealed substantial cost savings due to reduced LOS and the elimination of routine post-operative blood tests, estimated at over £1.6m per year. Elective activity over winter was significantly higher (79%) than in the same time period in the previous year. An acute introduction of a carefully planned and coordinated short-stay hip and knee pathway is safe, cost-effective and popular with patients, but also contributes to increased efficiency in the delivery of elective healthcare in the context of increasing demand and financial constraints in the NHS

Abstract. Background. Daycase pathways which aim to discharge patients the same day following Unicompartmental Knee Replacement have been introduced in some centres, though most continue with Standard pathways. While Daycase pathways have cost savings, recovery data comparing pathways is limited. This study aims to compare patient-reported early recovery between Daycase and Standard pathways following UKR. Method. This study was carried out in two centres that originally used the same Standard recovery pathway for UKR. In one centre, the Standard pathway was modified into a Daycase pathway. 26 Daycase-Outpatient, 11 Daycase-Inpatient, and 18 Standard patients were recruited. Patients completed the Oxford Arthroplasty Early Recovery Score (OARS) and SF-36 (Acute) measure between Days 1–42. Results. Standard patients had significantly better Day-1 scores than Daycase patients, but this difference rapidly diminished, and from Day-3 onwards both groups had near-identical scores (OARS Day-1, 59 vs 37, p=0.002, stemming from differences in Pain, Nausea/Feeling-Unwell, Function/Mobility subscores p=0.003,0.014,0.011. OARS Day-3 48 vs 49, p=0.790). Daycase-Outpatients had a higher overall OARS (p=0.002), recovering 1–2 weeks faster than Daycase-Inpatients. OARS subscores demonstrated that Daycase-Outpatients had better Pain, Nausea/Feeling-Unwell, Fatigue/Sleep scores (p=0.020,0.0004,0.019 respectively). SF-36 scores corroborate OARS scores. Conclusion. The Standard cohort had better Day-1 scores than the Daycase cohort, likely due to later mobilisation and stronger inpatient analgesia; these differences diminished by Day-3. Daycase-Outpatients recovered substantially faster than Daycase-Inpatients – likely due to the factors that delayed their discharge. The convergence of scores at 6 weeks demonstrates that both pathways have similar early recovery outcomes

Aims. We introduced a self-care pathway for minimally displaced distal radius fractures, which involved the patient being discharged from a Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) without a physical review and being provided with written instructions on how to remove their own cast or splint at home, plus advice on exercises and return to function. Methods. All patients managed via this protocol between March and October 2020 were contacted by a medical secretary at a minimum of six months post-injury. The patients were asked to complete the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), a satisfaction questionnaire, advise if they had required surgery and/or contacted any health professional, and were also asked for any recommendations on how to improve the service. A review with a hand surgeon was organized if required, and a cost analysis was also conducted. Results. Overall 71/101 patients completed the telephone consultation; no patients required surgery, and the mean and median PRWE scores were 23.9/100 (SD 24.9) and 17.0/100 (interquartile range (IQR) 0 to 40), respectively. Mean patient satisfaction with treatment was 34.3/40 (SD 9.2), and 65 patients (92%) were satisfied or highly satisfied. In total there were 16 contact calls, 12 requests for a consultant review, no formal complaints, and 15 minor adjustment suggestions to improve patient experience. A relationship was found between intra-articular injuries and lower patient satisfaction scores (p = 0.025), however no relationship was found between PRWE scores and the nature of the fracture. Also, no relationship was found between the type of immobilization and the functional outcome or patient satisfaction. Cost analysis of the self-care pathway V traditional pathway showed a cost savings of over £13,500 per year with the new self-care model compared to the traditional model. Conclusion. Our study supports a VFC self-care pathway for patients with minimally displaced distal radius fractures. The pathway provides a good level of patient satisfaction and function. To improve the service, we will make minor amendments to our patient information sheet. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(9):726–732

Introduction: Ranked as the second most common cause of long-term disability amongst American adults, osteoarthritis (OA) affects well over 60 million Americans per year. OA is one of the major contributors to health care-related economic cost in the US, which is generally considered unacceptably high when compared other Western industrialized nations. Methods: Three hundred and thirty-five patients undergoing primary unilateral or bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA), metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MOMHR), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) were offered voluntary participation in an one-on-one preoperative education session with a pre-operative educator. Length of stay (LOS) and in-patient costs was collected for patients who received individual pre-operative education. This was then compared to patients who chose not to participate in the education sessions using linear regression models. Results: Patients who chose to participate enjoyed a significantly shorter LOS than those who did not receive education, controlling for age, sex, type of procedure, and number of co-morbid conditions (3.1 ± 1.1 vs. 4.5 ± 4.7; p< 0.01). THA patients participating in the preoperative education program exhibited a calculated cost savings of $861 per case over non-educated patients (p=0.06), while TKA patients participating in the program exhibited a statistically significant savings of $1,144 per case (p=0.02). This translated into a cost savings of $84,351 for 93 THA patients and $93,493 for 74 TKA patients at our institution, accounting for the cost of the patient educator. Of higher significant impact on cost savings was the number of co-morbid conditions for both THA (p=0.01) and TKA (p=0.01) patients. If applied in the national setting, national cost savings projections for a mean 0.84 day reduction in LOS for educated THA patients estimated a savings of nearly $800 million; a mean 0.56 day reduction for preoperatively educated TKA translated into a projected savings of $1.1 billion on the national scale. Conclusion: Preoperative education in the setting of hip and knee arthroplasty is an important cost-savings tool for hospitals, Medicare and third party payers in this era of rising health care costs

Anatomically specific fixation devices have become mainstream, yet there are anatomical regions and clinical conditions where no pre-contoured plates are available, such as for glenohumeral arthrodesis. In a case series of 4 glenohumeral arthrodesis patients, a consultant orthopaedic surgeon at GCUH implemented 3D printing technology to create reconstructions of each patient's shoulder girdle to pre-contour arthrodesis plates. Our aim was to quantify the cost-benefit & intra-operative time savings of this technique in glenohumeral arthrodesis. We hypothesized that the use of 3D printing for creating patient specific implants through pre-operative contouring of plates will lead to intra-operative time and cost savings by minimising time spent bending plates during surgery. This study analysed 4 patients who underwent shoulder arthrodesis by a single consultant orthopaedic surgeon at GCUH between 2017-2021. A CT-based life-size model of each patient's shoulder girdle was 3D printed using freely available computer software programs: 3D Slicer, Blender, Mesh Mixer & Cura. Once the patient's 3D model was created, plate benders were used to contour the plate pre-op, which was then sterilised prior to surgery. Arthrodesis was performed according to AO principles of fixation. The time spent pre-bending the plate using the 3D model was calculated to analyse the intra-op time and cost-saving benefits. For the 4 cases, the plate pre-bending times were 45, 40, 45 & 20 minutes (average 38.8 mins). The intra-op correction time to make small adjustments to the plate was 2 min/ case. 3 plates needed minor (3 degree) adjustment to fine-tune scapula spine contouring. 1 plate needed a 5 degree correction to fine-tune hand position. On average, the pre-bending of the plate saved approximately 38.8 mins intra-op/ case. These shorter anaesthetic and operating times equate to approximately $2586 saving/ case, given an estimate of $4000/hour of theatre costs. We conclude that pre-bending plates around 3D-printed life-size models of an individual's shoulder girdle prior to surgery results in approximately 38.8 mins time saving intra-op when used in shoulder arthrodesis. This is a viable and effective technique that will ultimately result in significant operative time and financial savings

Tranexamic Acid (TXA) is now commonly used in major surgical operations including orthopaedics. The TRAC-24 randomised control trial aimed to assess if an additional 24 hours of TXA post – operatively in primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reduced blood loss. Contrary to other orthopaedic studies to date this trial included high risk patients. This paper presents the results of a cost analysis undertaken alongside this RTC. TRAC-24 was a prospective randomised controlled trial on patients undergoing TKA and THA. Three groups were included, Group 1 received 1 g intravenous (IV) TXA perioperatively and an additional 24-hour post-operative oral regime, group 2 received only the perioperative dose and group 3 did not receive TXA. Cost analysis was performed out to day 90. Group 1 was associated with the lowest mean total costs, followed by group 2 and then group 3. The difference between groups 1 and 3 −£797.77 (95% CI −1478.22, −117.32) were statistically significant. Extended oral dosing reduced costs for patients undergoing THA but not TKA. The reduced costs in groups 1 and 2 resulted from reduced length of stay, readmission rates, Accident and Emergency (A&E) attendances and blood transfusions. This study demonstrated significant cost savings when using TXA in primary THA or TKA. Extended oral dosing reduced costs further in THA but not TKA

Aims. The aim of this study was to compare ten-year longitudinal healthcare costs and revision rates for patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. The Humana database was used to compare 2,383 patients undergoing UKA between 2007 and 2009, who were matched 1:1 from a cohort of 63,036 patients undergoing primary TKA based on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Medical and surgical complications were tracked longitudinally for one year following surgery. Rates of revision surgery and cumulative mean healthcare costs were recorded for this period of time and compared between the cohorts. Results. Patients undergoing TKA had significantly higher rates of manipulation under anaesthesia (3.9% vs 0.9%; p < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (5.0% vs 3.1%; p < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (1.5% vs 0.8%; p = 0.001), and renal failure (4.2% vs 2.2%; p < 0.001). Revision rates, however, were significantly higher for UKA at five years (6.0% vs 4.2%; p = 0.007) and ten years postoperatively (6.5% vs 4.4%; p = 0.002). Longitudinal-related healthcare costs for patients undergoing TKA were greater than for those undergoing UKA at one year ($24,771 vs $22,071; p < 0.001) and five years following surgery ($26,549 vs $25,730; p < 0.001); however, the mean costs of TKA were comparable to UKA at ten years ($26,877 vs $26,891; p = 0.425). Conclusion. Despite higher revision rates, patients undergoing UKA had lower mean healthcare costs than those undergoing TKA up to ten years following the procedure, at which time costs were comparable. In the era of value-based care, surgeons and policymakers should be aware of the costs involved with these procedures. UKA was associated with fewer complications at one year postoperatively but higher revision rates at five and ten years. While UKA was significantly less costly than TKA at one and five years, costs at ten years were comparable with a mean difference of only $14. Lowering the risk of revision surgery should be targeted as a source of cost savings for both UKA and TKA as the mean related healthcare costs were 2.5-fold higher in patients requiring revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):23–31

The purpose of this prospective pilot study is to examine the feasibility of a physiotherapist led rapid access shoulder screening clinic (RASC). The goal of this study is to assess for improvements in patient access to care, patient reported outcome measures, patient reported experience measures, and cost outcomes using time driven activity based costing methods. Patient recruitment began in January 2021. Consultation requests from general practitioners and emergency rooms are analyzed and triaged through a central system. One half of patients awaiting consultation were triaged to the traditional route used at our center while the other half were triaged to be assessed at the RASC. Outcome measures consisting of the Simple Shoulder Test and SF-12 were recorded at the initial consultation and at follow up appointments. Cost benefit analysis was conducted using time driven activity based costing methods (TD-ABC). From January to August of 2021, 123 new patients were triaged for RASC assessment. On average, the RASC gets 10 new referrals per month. As of September 2021, there are 65 patients still on waitlist for RASC assessment with 58 having been assessed. Of the 58, 11% were discharged through the RASC, 48% pursued private physiotherapy, 14% had injections, 19% proceeded on for surgical consultation, and 8% did not show. Over time same time period, approximately 15 new patients were seen in consultation by the surgeon's office. Thirty-five responses were obtained from RASC patients during their initial intake assessment. The average age of respondents was 54.7 with 21 females and 14 males. Median SF-12 scores in the physical dimension (PCS-12) for RASC patients were 36.82 and mental (MCS-12) 49.38927. Median Simple Shoulder Test scores measured 6. Of the patients who responded to the follow up questionnaires after completing physiotherapy at the RASC, both the SF-12 and Simple Shoulder Test scoring improved. Median PCS-12 measured 47.08, MCS-12 of 55.87, and Simple Shoulder Test measured 8. RASC assessments by PT saved $172.91 per hour for consultation and $157.97 per hour for patient follow ups. Utilization of a physiotherapy led rapid access shoulder clinic resulted in improvements in patient outcomes as measured by the SF-12 and Simple Shoulder Test as well as significant direct cost savings. Proper triage protocols to identify which patients would be suitable for RASC assessment, buy-in from physiotherapists, and timely assessment of patients for early initiation of rehabilitation for shoulder pain is paramount to the success of a RASC system at our centre. Future research direction would be geared to analyzing a larger dataset as it becomes available

It has been established that a dedicated orthopaedic trauma room (DOTR) provides significant clinical and organizational benefits to the management of trauma patients. After-hours care is associated with surgeon fatigue, a high risk of patient complications, and increased costs related to staffing. However, hesitation due to concerns of the associated opportunity cost at the hospital leadership level is a major barrier to wide-spread adoption. The primary aim of this study is to determine the impact of dedicated orthopaedic trauma room (DOTR) implementation on operating room efficiency. Secondly, we sought to evaluate the associated financial impact of the DOTR, with respect to both after-hours care costs as well as the opportunity cost of displaced elective cases. This was a retrospective cost-analysis study performed at a single academic-affiliated community hospital in Toronto, Canada. All patients that underwent the most frequently performed orthopedic trauma procedures (hip hemiarthroplasty, open reduction internal fixation of the ankle, femur, elbow and distal radius), over a four-year period from 2016-2019 were included. Patient data acquired for two-years prior and two-years after the implementation of a DOTR were compared, adjusting for the number of cases performed. Surgical duration and number of day-time and after-hours cases was recorded pre- and post-implementation. Cost savings of performing trauma cases during daytime and the opportunity cost of displacing elective cases by performing cases during the day was calculated. A sensitivity analysis accounting for varying overtime costs and hospital elective case profit was also performed. 1960 orthopaedic cases were examined pre- and post-DOTR. All procedures had reduced total operative time post-DOTR. After accounting for the total number of each procedure performed, the mean weighted reduction was 31.4% and the mean time saved was 29.6 minutes per surgery. The number of daytime surgical hours increased 21%, while nighttime hours decreased by 37.8%. Overtime staffing costs were reduced by $24,976 alongside increase in opportunity costs of $22,500. This resulted in a net profit of $2,476. Our results support the premise that DOTRs improve operating room efficiency and can be cost efficient. Through the regular scheduling of a DOTR at a single hospital in Canada, the number of surgeries occurring during daytime hours increased while the number of after-hours cases decreased. The same surgeries were also completed nearly one-third faster (30 minutes per case) on average. Our study also specifically addresses the hesitation regarding potential loss of profit from elective surgeries. Notably, the savings partially stem from decreased OR time as well as decreased nurse overtime. Widespread implementation can improve patient care while still remaining financially favourable

Introduction:. Historically the incidence of Achilles re-ruptures has been described as around 5% after surgical repair and up to 21% after conservative management. In 2008 we commenced a dedicated Achilles tendon rupture clinic for both conservative and surgically managed patients using new standardised operating procedures (SOP). We have evaluated the impact of this new service, particularly with regard to re-rupture rate. Materials and methods:. The SOP was stage dependent and included an initial ultrasound examination, functional orthotics with early weight bearing, accelerated exercise and guidelines for the return to work and sport. Evaluation included re-rupture rate, complication rate, and outcome measured by the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and Achilles Tendon Repair Score (AS). A basic cost evaluation was performed to assess any potential savings. Results:. A total of 213 patients (151 treated conservatively and 62 surgically) were included. Re-rupture occurred in two patients (1 conservative and 1 surgically managed). There were 16 major complications e.g. DVT, wound infection. The mean ATRS was 54.79, 67.66 and 71.05 at 4, 6 and 9 months respectively and the mean AS was 64.67, 73.96 and 71.05 at 4, 6 and 9 months respectively. The reduction in re-rupture compared to the literature was 4.1% and 19.1% for surgical and conservatively treated patients respectively. Cost savings achieved were £50,000 each annum. This was due to both a decrease in the number of re-ruptures as well as a decrease in the number of patients being managed operatively. Conclusion:. A dedicated follow up Achilles clinic treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures using monitored SOP's, provides an exceptionally low re-rupture rate (0.9%), excellent patient outcome and potential cost savings compared to a traditional fracture clinic approach. The reduction in re-rupture rate, and therefore cost savings, is greater in conservatively managed patients

Abstract. Objectives. Knee alignment affects both the development and surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Automating femorotibial angle (FTA) and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) measurement from radiographs could improve reliability and save time. Further, if the gold-standard HKA from full-limb radiographs could be accurately predicted from knee-only radiographs then the need for more expensive equipment and radiation exposure could be reduced. The aim of this research is to assess if deep learning methods can predict FTA and HKA angle from posteroanterior (PA) knee radiographs. Methods. Convolutional neural networks with densely connected final layers were trained to analyse PA knee radiographs from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) database with corresponding angle measurements. The FTA dataset with 6149 radiographs and HKA dataset with 2351 radiographs were split into training, validation and test datasets in a 70:15:15 ratio. Separate models were learnt for the prediction of FTA and HKA, which were trained using mean squared error as a loss function. Heat maps were used to identify the anatomical features within each image that most contributed to the predicted angles. Results. FTA could be predicted with errors less than 3° for 99.8% of images, and less than 1° for 89.5%. HKA prediction was less accurate than FTA but still high: 95.7% within 3°, and 68.0 % within 1°. Heat maps for both models were generally concentrated on the knee anatomy and could prove a valuable tool for assessing prediction reliability in clinical application. Conclusions. Deep learning techniques could enable fast, reliable and accurate predictions of both FTA and HKA from plain knee radiographs. This could lead to cost savings for healthcare providers and reduced radiation exposure for patients

Introduction: The addition of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) showed significant reduction of secondary intervention, fracture healing time and infection rates compared with intramedullary nailing alone in open tibia fractures. However, the upfront price of approx. 3000 € is a barrier to its regular use. The goal of the study was to determine potential cost savings and cost-effectiveness of rhBMP-2 in grade III open tibia fractures from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and the German Health Care System and to derive conclusions for other European health care systems. Materials and Methods: Clinical data from a previously published randomised controlled study with 450 patients (“BESTT study”) were used to generate total treatment costs for each patient for the control and the 1.5 mg/ml BMP-2 group based on the current German-DRG and the NHS for UK. The analysis was performed from a health care system and a societal perspective for a one year time horizon. Furthermore, assessment of the cost-effectiveness of BMP-2 was done by utility analysis. Results: The use of BMP-2 for grade III open tibia fractures is leading to cost savings of 3183 € per case and, therefore, to net savings for the German health care system. The main driver for cost savings is faster fracture healing with faster resumption of work and reduced expenses for sickness leave payments. For the UK rhBMP-2 is a cost-effective strategy with a cost-effectiveness ratio of approx. £11,000/QALY which is well below the standard £30,000 benchmark for the NHS. From a societal perspective, rhBMP-2 is a cost-saving treatment. Conclusions: BMP-2 leads to net savings in grade III open tibia fractures in Germany which can be expected for other European countries where sickness payments are provided by health care insurers. For countries like UK where sickness are provided by third parties BMP-2 is a cost-effective treatment strategy from a health care system perspective and a cost-saving treatment from a societal perspective

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common and extremely beneficial procedure that is being performed more often as the population ages. Current THA follow-up guidelines require large amounts of resources and may not justify their cost with increased patient outcomes. Most problems that would require THA revision will cause symptoms. Late-presenting asymptomatic THAs that are found to require revision are complicated and expensive to address and often lead to poor patient outcomes. Follow-up visits for THA patients are essentially a screening tool to identify asymptomatic THAs that require revision. The rate of asymptomatic THA revision and the subsequent cost of screening for them is not well reported in the literature. Given the relative shortage of orthopaedic resources, efficient use of clinic time should be a priority and inefficient practices should be identified and changed. We calculated the rate of asymptomatic hip revisions over the first twenty years of THA ownership. We further calculated the cost of a single visit to the orthopaedic clinic for follow up of a THA. Finally, we calculated the cost savings of decreasing the follow-up schedule to a total of three visits. The cost savings of foregoing the screening to identify one asymptomatic THA requiring revision is CAD $1.2 million. Asymptomatic THAs requiring revision are rare and, as such, require a large amount of follow up to diagnose. As a screening tool, regular orthopaedic follow up of THA is an inefficient use of resources. Current follow-up guidelines are cost-prohibitive and should be made much less frequent in order to save resources

Aims. The aim of the Scaphoid Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Trauma (SMaRT) trial was to evaluate the clinical and cost implications of using immediate MRI in the acute management of patients with a suspected fracture of the scaphoid with negative radiographs. Patients and Methods. Patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a suspected fracture of the scaphoid and negative radiographs were randomized to a control group, who did not undergo further imaging in the ED, or an intervention group, who had an MRI of the wrist as an additional test during the initial ED attendance. Most participants were male (52% control, 61% intervention), with a mean age of 36.2 years (18 to 73) in the control group and 38.2 years (20 to 71) in the intervention group. The primary outcome was total cost impact at three months post-recruitment. Secondary outcomes included total costs at six months, the assessment of clinical findings, diagnostic accuracy, and the participants’ self-reported level of satisfaction. Differences in cost were estimated using generalized linear models with gamma errors. Results. The mean cost up to three months post-recruitment per participant was £542.40 (. sd. £855.20, n = 65) for the control group and £368.40 (. sd. £338.60, n = 67) for the intervention group, leading to an estimated cost difference of £174 (95% confidence interval (CI) -£30 to £378; p = 0.094). The cost difference per participant increased to £266 (95% CI £3.30 to £528; p = 0.047) at six months. Overall, 6.2% of participants (4/65, control group) and 10.4% of participants (7/67, intervention group) had sustained a fracture of the scaphoid (p = 0.37). In addition, 7.7% of participants (5/65, control group) and 22.4% of participants (15/67, intervention group) had other fractures diagnosed (p = 0.019). The use of MRI was associated with higher diagnostic accuracy both in the diagnosis of a fracture of the scaphoid (100.0% vs 93.8%) and of any other fracture (98.5% vs 84.6%). Conclusion. The use of immediate MRI in the management of participants with a suspected fracture of the scaphoid and negative radiographs led to cost savings while improving the pathway’s diagnostic accuracy and patient satisfaction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:984–994

Aims. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted and delayed medical and surgical examinations where attendance is required in person. Our article aims to outline the validity of online assessment, the range of benefits to both candidate and assessor, and the challenges to its implementation. In addition, we propose pragmatic suggestions for its introduction into medical assessment. Methods. We reviewed the literature concerning the present status of online medical and surgical assessment to establish the perceived benefits, limitations, and potential problems with this method of assessment. Results. Global experience with online, remote virtual examination has been largely successful with many benefits conferred to the trainee, and both an economic and logistical advantage conferred to the assessor or organization. Advances in online examination software and remote proctoring are overcoming practical caveats including candidate authentication, cheating prevention, cybersecurity, and IT failure. Conclusion. Virtual assessment provides benefits to both trainee and assessor in medical and surgical examinations and may also result in cost savings. Virtual assessment is likely to be increasingly used in the post-COVID world and we present recommendations for the continued adoption of virtual examination. It is, however, currently unable to completely replace clinical assessment of trainees. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(2):111–118

Introduction. Hip and knee device sales representatives (reps) can provide intra-operative guidance through their knowledge of the products, especially in complicated cases such as revision hip and knee arthroplasty. However, for an experienced arthroplasty surgeon in the majority of straightforward primary cases, the rep's presence may not be required for clinical decision-makings. With recent challenges in cost savings and bundle payments, hospitals and surgeons have focused on reducing the implant costs, among others, with a “repless” model. The aim of this study was to describe the process of utilizing this model, assess its efficacy, and analyze the cost savings in primary hip arthroplasty. Methods. During the month of January 2016, 20 cases of primary, straightforward total hip arthroplasties were performed with the repless model by 2 experienced arthroplasty trained surgeons. All patients were followed prospectively for minimum 3 months. Prior to initiating the repless model, we focused on process management of the operating room with staff training and re-engineering of the trays to obtain a setup that included one hospital tray and one device company tray for each operation. The responsibilities of the rep were divided into 2 categories for better management:. Familiarity of the instruments, implant, and techniques; trays set up and assurance of availability of the implants. These responsibilities were covered by a trained OR technician and the surgeon. Final verification of the accurate implants prior to opening the packaging. This was done by a trained OR nurse and the surgeon. Results. We did not have any intra-operative complications. We also did not encounted any issued with the trays or errors in opening of the implants. There were no re-admissions, fracture, dislocation, or infection. The mean length of stay was 2.2 ± 0.5 days (range 1–3 days) with 68% home discharges. The cost of the implant was reduced from $4,800 to $1,895 with $2,905 cost saving per case and total savings of $58,100. The projected savings only for uncomplicated primary total hip arthroplasty (minimum 120 cases/year between 2 surgeons) is $384,600. Further cost saving from the process management changes were seen in central sterile processing time. Prior to the one tray system, the hospital had 3 in-house trays and there were 4 device company trays. We also noticed an approximate 27% improvement in turnover time. Conclusion. Repless model has significant cost saving potential. Preparation for the transition, proper patient selection, standardization of the trays and implants, and distribution of the responsibilities between OR nurses, technicians and the surgeon are essential

Purpose. Traditionally, an inpatient hospital stay has been required for joint replacement surgery. The three primary drivers of cost for joint replacement have been implant cost, other hospital charges and postoperative rehabilitation costs. The three primary reasons that have made hospitalization necessary are pain control, blood loss / transfusion, and monitoring patients with comorbidities. Advances in surgical technique, implants, comprehensive blood management, and multimodal pain management have allowed a marked reduction in the hospital stay required and have eliminated the need for extensive formal rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if hip resurfacing can be performed safely and cost-effectively as an outpatient procedure. Methods. We present the short-term outcome of our first 125 hip resurfacings done as an outpatient procedure performed by two experienced surgeons. Young patients without major medical co-morbidities were selected. The average age was 53±7 years old (range: 38 to 66), there were 98 men and 27 women. The mean ASA score was 1.7±0.5 (range 1 to 3). The diagnosis was OA in 92, dysplasia in 22, and osteonecrosis in 9, and trauma in 2. There were no major complications noted in the first 6 weeks postoperative. There was one ER visit, and there were no hospitalizations required. Results. The average and highest pain score for each day was shown in Figure 1 for the first 5 days postoperative. Three patients required a morphine injection after discharge from the surgery center. No patients required a transfusion. The satisfaction survey showed: The cost comparison is obtained from the Blue Cross website which indicates that the “120 day episode of care” for total hip arthroplasty is $35,000, $ 45,000, and $65,000 at the three local hospitals, while cost at our surgery center was $26,000. This represents a cost savings for the insurance company of nearly $9,000 (26%) compared to the lowest cost and $39,000 (60%) compared to the highest cost hospital in our region. Conclusion. We conclude that in properly selected patients, outpatient hip resurfacing can be accomplished safely, with a high degree of patient satisfaction and a tremendous cost savings to the insurer. We suspect that indications can be gradually expanded to allow more patients to take advantage of this option. If insurers could find creative ways to incentivize patients to take advantage of the highest quality lowest cost options, tremendous health care savings are possible in a free-market health care model free of excessive government regulations and price controls

Purpose and background. To explore the cost-utility of implementing stratified care for low back pain (LBP) in general practice, compared with usual care, within patient risk subgroups (low, medium and high risk of persistent disabling pain determined by the STarT Back tool). Methods. Adopting a cost-utility framework alongside a prospective, sequential comparison of separate patient cohorts (922 patients in total) with six-month follow-up, the base case analysis estimated the incremental LBP-related healthcare cost per additional quality-adjusted life year (QALY) by risk subgroup. Uncertainty was explored with cost-utility planes and acceptability curves. Sensitivity analyses examined alternative approaches (a complete case analysis, the incorporation of non-LBP-related healthcare use and estimation of societal costs relating to work absence). Results. Stratified care was a dominant treatment strategy compared with usual care for patients at high risk, with mean healthcare cost savings of £124 and an incremental QALY estimate of 0.023. The likelihood that stratified care provides a cost-effective use of resources for patients at low and medium risk is no greater than 60% irrespective of a decision makers' willingness-to-pay for additional QALYs. Patients at medium and high risk of persistent disability in paid employment at six-month follow-up reported, on average, six fewer days of LBP-related work absence in the stratified care cohort compared with usual care (associated societal cost savings per employed patient of £736 and £652, respectively). Conclusions. At the observed level of adherence to screening tool recommendations for matched treatments, stratified care for LBP is cost-effective for patients at high risk of persistent disabling LBP. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: The Health Foundation

INTRODUCTION. Preoperative optimization and protocols for joint replacement care pathways have led to decreased length of stay (LOS), decreased narcotic use and are increasingly important in delivering quality, cost savings and shifting appropriate cases to an outpatient setting. The intraoperative use of vasopressors is independently associated with increased length of stay, risk of adverse postoperative events including death and in total hip arthroplasty there is an increased risk for ICU admission. Our aim is to characterize the patient characteristics associated with vasopressor use specifically in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed 748 patients undergoing inpatient primary total knee arthroplasty at a single academic institution by two surgeons from 1/1/17 to 12/21/18. Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative factors and intraoperative medication administration were compared with multivariate regression to identify patients who may require intraoperative vasopressors. RESULTS. Seven hundred-forty eight patients underwent total knee arthroplasty and 439 patients required intraoperative vasopressors while 307 did not require vasopressors. Significant predictors of vasopressor use were male sex (p=0.035), history of prior cerebrovascular event (p=0.041) and older age (p=0.048). NPO time, anesthesia provider level of training, operative time, and intraoperative mean arterial pressure and heart rate were not significant predictors of vasopressor use intra-operatively during total knee arthroplasty. CONCLUSION. In this study, nearly fifty-nine percent of patients undergoing TKA received intraoperative vasopressor support. Male gender, history of stroke and older age were significantly associated with increased intraoperative vasopressor use. Surgical time and case order do not appear to be optimizable factors to minimize the use of vasopressors in TKA. Our results highlight variation in anesthesia practices and an opportunity to standardize vasopressor triggers and identify patients who may require vasopressor support during preoperative optimization and selection of their surgical setting

Abstract. Objective. In this systematic review we aim to analyse the economical impact of using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. Four medical electronic databases were searched. Eligible studies included those investigating the costs of NPWT in primary TKA. Exclusion criteria included studies investigating cost of NPWT not related to primary TKA. We also excluded studies with poor scientific methodology. We retrieved and analysed data on dressing costs and hospital length of stay (LOS). Results. Three studies (359 patients) reported on dressing and associated health care costs, and two further studies (330 patients) reported on hospital LOS in primary TKA. The cost of NPWT ranged between £125 and £196; with an average cost of £155, compared to £23 for the regular surgical dressing. The hospital LOS in NWPT patients ranged from 1.9 – 3.8 days, while LOS in patients managed with regular surgical dressing ranged between 2.3 – 4.7 days. The hospital LOS accounted for delayed discharge due to wound complications. Any extended LOS secondary to medical comorbidities or for other reasons were not included here. Conclusion. Our pooled analysis found a decrease in hospital LOS from wound related problems when using NWPT instead of regular dressings after accounting for other variables responsible for LOS. If the mean cost of overnight inpatient hospital stay for elective TKA is estimated as £275, the range of overnight admission cost for one TKA patient would be £522 - £1045 when NPWT dressing is used, and £632.5 - £1292 when using regular dressings. The cost savings from reduced LOS amounts to £110 - £247 per patient when NPWT is used. We hypothesize that in primary TKA patients with high risk of wound related problems that may delay discharge from hospital, there may be an overall cost saving when using NWPT dressings. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Objectives. “Virtual fracture clinics” have been reported as a safe and effective alternative to the traditional fracture clinic. Robust protocols are used to identify cases that do not require further review, with the remainder triaged to the most appropriate subspecialist at the optimum time for review. The objective of this study was to perform a “top-down” analysis of the cost effectiveness of this virtual fracture clinic pathway. Methods. National Health Service financial returns relating to our institution were examined for the time period 2009 to 2014 which spanned the service redesign. Results. The total staffing costs rose by 4% over the time period (from £1 744 933 to £1 811 301) compared with a national increase of 16%. The total outpatient department rate of attendance fell by 15% compared with a national fall of 5%. Had our local costs increased in line with the national average, an excess expenditure of £212 705 would have been required for staffing costs. Conclusions. The virtual fracture clinic system was associated with less overall use of staff resources in comparison to national cost data. Adoption of this system nationally may have the potential to achieve significant cost savings. Cite this article: P. J. Jenkins. Fracture clinic redesign reduces the cost of outpatient orthopaedic trauma care. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:33–36. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.52.2000506

Introduction. Traditionally an inpatient hospital stay has been required for all joint replacement surgery. The three primary drivers of cost for joint replacement have been implant cost, other hospital charges and postoperative rehabilitation costs. The three primary reasons that have made hospitalization necessary are pain control, therapy and possible transfusion. Advances in surgical technique, implants, comprehensive blood management, and multimodal pain management have allowed a marked reduction in the hospital stay required, eliminated the need for extensive formal rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if hip resurfacing can be performed safely and cost-effectively as an outpatient procedure. Methods. We present the short-term outcome of our first 77 hip resurfacings done as an outpatient procedure performed by two experienced surgeons. Young patients without major medical co-morbidities were selected. The average age was 53±6 years old (range: 38 to 66), there were 57 men and 20 women. The mean ASA score was 1.6±0.5 (range 1 to 2). The diagnosis was OA in 56, dysplasia in 17, avascular necrosis in 2, and others in 2. Results. All patients were successfully discharged on the day of surgery from our physician-owned outpatient surgery center. There were no major complications noted in the first 6 weeks postoperative. There was one ER visit, and there were no hospitalizations required. The average and highest pain score for each day was shown in Figure 1 for the first 5 days postoperative. Three patients required a morphine injection after discharge from the surgery center. No patients required a transfusion. The cost comparison is obtained from the Blue Cross website which indicates that the “120 day episode of care” cost for hip replacement was $35,000 at Providence, $ 45,000 at Palmetto, $65,000 at Lexington hospital, while cost at our surgery center was $26,000. This represents a cost savings for the insurance company of nearly $9,000 (26%) compared to the lowest cost and $39,000 (60%) compared to the highest cost hospital in our region. Conclusion. We conclude that in properly selected patients, outpatient hip resurfacing can be accomplished safely, with a high degree of patient satisfaction and a tremendous cost savings to the insurer. We suspect that indications can be gradually expanded to allow more patients to take advantage of this option. If insurers could find creative ways to incentivize patients to take advantage of the highest quality, lowest cost options, tremendous health care savings are possible in a free-market health care model free of excessive government regulations and price controls

Aims. Recent improvements in surgical technique and perioperative blood management after total joint replacement (TJR) have decreased rates of transfusion. However, as many surgeons transition to outpatient TJR, obtaining routine postoperative blood tests becomes more challenging. Therefore, we sought to determine if a preoperative outpatient assessment tool that stratifies patients based on numerous medical comorbidities could predict who required postoperative haemoglobin (Hb) measurement. Methods. We performed a prospective study of consecutive unilateral primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed at a single institution. Prospectively collected data included preoperative and postoperative Hb levels, need for blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) score. Results. A total of 504 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age at time of arthroplasty was 65.3 years (SD 10.2). Of the patients, 216 (42.9%) were THAs and 288 (57.1%) were TKAs. Six patients required a blood transfusion postoperatively (1.19%). Transfusion after surgery was associated with lower postoperative day 1 Hb (median of 8.5 (interquartile range (IQR) 7.9 to 8.6) vs 11.3 (IQR 10.4 to 12.2); p < 0.001), longer length of stay (1 day (IQR 1 to 1) vs 2 days (IQR 2 to 3); p < 0.001), higher OARA score (median of 60.0 (IQR 40 to 75) vs 5.0 (IQR 0-35); p = 0.001), and total hip arthroplasty (p < 0.001). All patients who received a transfusion had an OARA score > 34; however, this did not reach statistical significance as a screening threshold. Conclusion. Risk of blood transfusion after primary TJR was uncommon in our series, with an incidence of 1.19%. Transfusion was associated with OARA scores > 60. The OARA score, not American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, reliably identified patients at risk for postoperative blood transfusion. Selective Hb monitoring may result in substantial cost savings in the era of cost containment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):65–70

Background. The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model was implemented in April-2016 to standardize cost and improve quality of care for two of the most commonly billed inpatient procedures for Medicare patients, total knee and total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare one institution's predicted savings and losses under the CJR model with actual savings and losses after two years of implementation and discuss new methods to maintain savings. Methods. Using our institution's data, we calculated the mean cost per episode of care. We calculated the percent reduction in target price and percent savings or losses per case for the CJR and Bundle Payment Care Initiative (BPCI) for each Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group (MS-DRG) using mean cost per episode and CJR and BPCI target prices. We compared the target prices, annual savings, and losses per episode of care for both CJR and BPCI. All CJR savings, projected and actual, were computed by comparing CJR savings to that of 2018 BPCI savings. Results. We found an average savings of 2.32% under CJR compared to the projected loss of −11.6% for MS-DRG 469 with fracture. There was a 7.97% savings for MS-DRG 470 without fracture compared to the projected 1.9%, a 20.94% savings for MS-DRG 470 with fracture compared to the projected 23.7%, and a loss of −3.98% for MS-DRG 469 without fracture compared to the projected 2.5% savings. Conclusions. The CJR target prices are lower than that of BPCI and this makes maintaining an episode of care at or below the target price increasingly difficult. Discharge disposition and readmission are well established factors that increase hospital cost [7]. However, reduction of these does not seem enough to maintain savings under the CJR model. New cost savings mechanisms such as identification of patients eligible for SDD, and reduction of unnecessary home services resulted in smaller losses of positive margins, though these were still significantly less for CJR than BPCI

Introduction. Robotic-arm assisted knee arthroplasty (rKA) has been associated with improved clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes. There is a paucity of literature, however, addressing its cost effectiveness. In the context of an integrated health system with an insurance plan and single source comprehensive data warehouse for electronic health records and claims data, we present an evaluation of healthcare costs and utilization associated with manual knee arthroplasty (mKA) versus rKA. We also examine the influence of rKA technology on surgeons’ practice patterns. Methods. Practice patterns of KA were assessed 18 months before and after introduction of robotic technology in April 2018. For patients also insured through the system's health plan, inpatient costs (actual costs recorded by health system), 90-day postoperative costs (allowed amounts paid by insurance plan), and 90-day postoperative utilization (length of stay, home health care visits, rehabilitation visits) were compared between mKA and rKA patients, stratified by total (TKA) or unicompartmental (UKA) surgery. Linear regression modeling was used to compare outcomes between the two pairs of groups (mKA vs. rKA, for both UKA and TKA). Log-link function and gamma error distribution was used for costs. All analyses were done using SAS statistical software, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results. Overall KA volume increased 21%, from 532 cases in the pre-rKA period to 644 post-rKA introduction, with UKA surgeries increasing from 38 to 97 (155%). Of these KAs, 218 patients were insured through our system's health plan (38 rUKAs, 9 mUKAs, 91 rTKAs, and 80 mTKAs), allowing precise insurance claims analysis for postoperative utilization and cost. Patients with rKA had significantly lower mean home health costs (-90% difference for UKA, −79% difference for TKA, p<0.02) and home rehab costs (-64% difference for UKA, −73% difference for TKA, p≤0.007) than mKA patients. No significant differences were observed in outpatient rehab (visits or costs), total rehab costs, or length of stay. Mean total postoperative costs were significantly lower for rUKA than mUKA (-47% difference, p=0.02) but similar for TKA (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in total inpatient costs between MAKO and non-MAKO patients. Conclusion. Robotic-arm assisted KA can allow for increased UKA volume and potential for substantial cost savings over the total episode of care by reducing postoperative utilization and costs

The discussion of outpatient unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) requires proof that it can be done safely and effectively, and also begs the question of whether it can be performed in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) rather than a general hospital (which raises costs and is typically less efficient). Successful outpatient UKA requires carefully crafted algorithms/protocols, home support, preoperative planning and preparation, expectation management, risk stratification (not everyone is a candidate), perioperative pain management and buy-in from patients, support networks and the health care team. Relatively little data is available on the feasibility, safety and potential cost savings associated with this shift in care. We evaluated the costs and short term outcomes and complications of 150 consecutive UKAs performed in an ASC compared to those done in a general hospital both on an inpatient and outpatient basis. Determination of the setting of the outpatient surgery was made based on geographic preference by the patients; otherwise choice of inpatient or outpatient surgery in the hospital was left to the discretion of the surgeon and was primarily based on the patients' comorbidity profile and circumstances of home help. Total direct facility costs were calculated, including institutional supplies and services, anesthesia services, implants, additional PACU medications and services required, and costs associated with operating room use. Only total cost was evaluated, as it is the most consistent cost variable amongst the two institutions evaluated. The mean total direct cost of UKA in a general community hospital with an overnight stay was 1.24 and 1.65 times greater than the cost of UKA performed at the same hospital or an ASC on an outpatient basis, respectively. The mean total direct cost of outpatient UKA in a general hospital was 1.33 times greater than the mean total cost of UKA performed in an ASC. Semi-autonomous robotic technology has been introduced to optimise accuracy of implant positioning and soft tissue balance in UKA, with the expectation of resultant improvement in durability and implant survivorship. Currently, nearly 20% of UKA's in the U.S. are being performed with robotic assistance. It is anticipated that there will be substantial growth in market penetration over the next decade, projecting that nearly 37% of UKA's and 23% of TKA's will be performed with robotics in 10 years (Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry, March 5, 2015). First generation robotic technology improved substantially implant position compared to conventional methods; however, high capital costs, uncertainty regarding the value of advanced technologies, and the need for preoperative CT scans were barriers to broader adoption. Newer image-free robotic technology offers an alternative method for further optimizing implant positioning and soft tissue balance without the need for preoperative CT scans and with price points that make it suitable for use in an ASC. Currently, as a result of cost and other practical issues, <1% of first generation robotic technologies are being used in ASC's. Alternatively, more than 35% of second generation robotic systems are in use in ASC's for UKA, due to favorable pricing. In conclusion, UKA can be safely performed in the outpatient setting in select patients. Additionally, we demonstrated a substantial cost savings when UKA is performed in an outpatient setting and care is shifted from a general community hospital to an ASC. Finally, robotics can be utilised to optimise accuracy of implant placement and soft tissue balance in UKA, and newer image-free robotic technology is cost effective for outpatient UKA

Introduction. Proposed advantages of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include enhanced accuracy for component positioning, reduced operative time, and increased OR efficiency leading to potential cost savings. However, various studies with relatively small sample sizes have evaluated the impact of these custom cutting guides and were unable to detect any significant differences compared to conventional surgical technique. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to improve the sensitivity of investigation through meta-analysis and compare patient-specific versus standard TKA instrumentation with regard to: (1) coronal alignment, (2) sagittal alignment, (3) operative time, (4) blood loss, (5) transfusion requirement, and (6) peri-operative costs. Methods. A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature indexed on Medline and/or Embase was performed in search of Level I, II, or III studies comparing the results of patient-specific versus standard TKA instrumentation. Nine studies remained following the screening process. The data published in these studies were extracted and aggregated for the purpose of comparing the two treatment groups with regard to coronal alignment, sagittal alignment, operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirement, and peri-operative costs. Using previously published data, it was determined that a sample size of 80 patients per group would have sufficient power (0.80) to detect a significant difference (α = 0.05) in all primary outcomes. Results. The nine component studies described a total of 957 total knee arthroplasties (529 performed with patient-specific instrumentation and 428 with standard instrumentation). While patient-specific instrumentation demonstrated improved accuracy in coronal alignment as measured by femorotibial angle (FTA) (p = 0.0003), standard instrumentation demonstrated improved accuracy in coronal alignment as measured by hip-knee-ankle (HKA) (p = 0.02). Importantly, there were no significant differences in the ability of either technique to avoid outliers (+ or – 3 degrees of target alignment) in either FTA or HKA. Measures of sagittal alignment accuracy were equivalent between the two groups for both the femoral component (p = 0.5) and the tibial component (p = 0.9). Operative time (92.5 minutes vs. 104.1 minutes, p = 0.1), blood loss (371 mL vs. 384 mL, p = 0.2), and transfusion requirement (10.1% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.1) were also similar between treatment groups. The three studies that compared costs (307 TKAs) found decreased peri-operative costs associated with patient-specific instrumentation as a result of increased OR efficiency, but these costs were offset by the expenditures related to producing the custom instrumentation. Discussion and Conclusion. Patient-specific instrumentation does not demonstrate superiority over standard instrumentation with regard to coronal or sagittal alignment. In addition, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion requirement are similar between techniques. Finally, while patient-specific instrumentation can lead to cost savings through improved OR efficiencies, these costs are often offset by the cost of generating the custom instrumentation. Therefore, current data does not support routine use of patient-specific instrumentation during primary TKA

The Swansea Morriston Achilles Rupture Treatment (SMART) programme was introduced in 2008. This paper summarises the outcome of this programme. Patients with a rupture of the Achilles tendon treated in our unit follow a comprehensive management protocol that includes a dedicated Achilles clinic, ultrasound examination, the use of functional orthoses, early weight-bearing, an accelerated exercise regime and guidelines for return to work and sport. The choice of conservative or surgical treatment was based on ultrasound findings. . The rate of re-rupture, the outcome using the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) and the Achilles Tendon Repair Score, (AS), and the complications were recorded. An elementary cost analysis was also performed. . Between 2008 and 2014 a total of 273 patients presented with an acute rupture 211 of whom were managed conservatively and 62 had surgical repair. There were three re-ruptures (1.1%). There were 215 men and 58 women with a mean age of 46.5 years (20 to 86). Functional outcome was satisfactory. Mean ATRS and AS at four months was 53.0 (. sd . 14), 64.9 (. sd. 15) (n = 135), six months 67.8 (. sd. 16), 73.8 (. sd. 15) (n = 103) and nine months (72.4; . sd. 14) 72.3 (. sd. 13) (n = 43). The programme realised estimated cost savings exceeding £91 000 per annum. The SMART programme resulted in a low rate of re-rupture, a satisfactory outcome, a reduced rate of surgical intervention and a reduction in healthcare costs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:510–15

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication after total hip and knee arthroplasty. There is still no consensus regarding the best mode of thromboprophylaxis after lower limb arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to ascertain the efficacy, safety profile and rate of adverse thromboembolic events of aspirin as extended out of hospital pharmacological anticoagulation for elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasty patients and whether these rates were comparable with published data for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Data was extracted from a prospective hospital acquired thromboembolism (HAT) database. The period of study was from 1st Jan 2013-31st Dec 2016 and a total of 6078 patients were treated with aspirin as extended thromboprophylaxis after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome measure of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism within 90 days postoperatively was 1.11%. The secondary outcome rates of wound infection, bleeding complications, readmission rate and mortality were comparable to published results after LMWH use. The results of this study clearly show that Aspirin, as part of a multimodal thromboprophylactic regime, is an effective and safe regime in preventing VTE with respect to risk of DVT or PE when compared to LMWH. It is a cheaper alternative to LMWH and has associated potential cost savings

Aims. The purpose of this study is to determine if higher volume hospitals have lower costs in revision hip and knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods. We questioned the Centres for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Inpatient Charge Data and identified 789 hospitals performing a total of 29 580 revision arthroplasties in 2014. Centres were dichotomised into high-volume (performing over 50 revision cases per year) and low-volume. Mean total hospital-specific charges and inpatient payments were obtained from the database and stratified based on Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) codes. Patient satisfaction scores were obtained from the multiyear CMS Hospital Compare database. Results. High-volume hospitals comprised 178 (30%) of the total but performed 15 068 (51%) of all revision cases, including 509 of 522 (98%) of the most complex DRG 466 cases. While high-volume hospitals had higher Medicare inpatient payments for DRG 467 ($21 458 versus $20 632, p = 0.038) and DRG 468 ($17 003 versus $16 120, p = 0.011), there was no difference in hospital specific charges between the groups. Higher-volume facilities had a better CMS hospital star rating (3.63 versus 3.35, p < 0.001). When controlling for hospital geographic and demographic factors, high-volume revision hospitals are less likely to be in the upper quartile of inpatient Medicare costs for DRG 467 (odds ratio (OR) 0.593, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.374 to 0.941, p = 0.026) and DRG 468 (OR 0.451, 95% CI 0.297 to 0.687, p <  0.001). Conclusion. While a high-volume hospital is less likely to be a high cost outlier, the higher mean Medicare reimbursements at these facilities may be due to increased case complexity. Further study should focus on measures for cost savings in revision total joint arthroplasties. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1611–17

Introduction: Common pathologies seen in hand clinics include Dupuytren’s contracture, ganglia and trigger digits. Some patients can be treated in the out patient department by percutaneous fasciotomy, aspiration, or percutaneous A1 pulley release. The effectiveness and safety of these procedures has been documented in the literature. There are no studies investigating the cost effectiveness these of treatments. Aim: Our aim was to compare the cost of treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture, ganglia and trigger digits in the out-patient department with the operating theatre. Methods: All patients seen in a new patient hand clinic with a diagnosis of Dupuytren’s contracture, trigger digit or ganglion of the wrist or hand were prospectively identified over a 6 month period.. The number undergoing a procedure in the out-patient clinic or theatre was recorded. Costings of theatre time and out-patient time were obtained from the hospital management. Results: 80, 26, and 52 patients were treated with regard to Dupuytrens contracture, ganglia, and trigger digits respectively over the 6-month period. Of these, 37, 23, and 44 were treated by an out patient procedure, and 43, 3 and 8 underwent a formal operation. Based on a cost of £216 per out-patient clinic session, the cost of the out-patient procedures was calculated at £1872 over 6 months, or £3744 per annum. Based on a theatre cost of £1785 per session, to perform all the clinic procedures as formal operations would have cost £60,690 over 6 months, or £121380 per annum. The cost savings were therefore £117636 per annum. Discussion: We conclude that outpatient interventions for dupuytrens disease, ganglions and trigger digits results in significant cost savings over formal surgical treatment