Recently concerns have been raised as to the effect of intra-articular radio-frequency energy on axillary nerve function. In our unit 120 shrinkage procedures have been performed with 5 intra-operative contractions of deltoid and no axillary nerve palsy. In this study we aimed to identify and quantify any changes in axillary nerve function following capsular shrinkage. Needle electrodes were inserted into the deltoid muscle of 10 patients undergoing radio-frequency capsular shrinkage and 3 patients having diagnostic arthroscopy. Recordings of Compound Muscle Action Potentials (CMAPs) were made following pre-operative magnetic coil stimulation of the axillary nerve. The nerve was then monitored during operation. At the end of the procedure, a further recording of CMAP following axillary nerve stimulation was made to allow comparison with initial readings. We have shown:. Low amplitude stimulations of the axillary nerve in 6 of the 10 patients undergoing shrinkage. Increase in latency of the axillary nerve was noted in some patients including the controls. Increase in latency was independent of time spent performing shrinkage. We have concluded:-. Stimulation of the axillary nerve occurs frequently during capsular shrinkage. This axillary nerve stimulation cannot be causally related to the application of radio-frequency energy. Increased latency may occur due to cooling of the nerve by extravasated irrigation fluid. Nerve monitoring is recommended during the training of surgeons new to this technique. We would like to acknowledge the Magstim Company for their assistance with this project

The axillary nerve injuries most commonly are observed after trauma such as contusion-stretch, gunshot wound, laceration and iatrogenic injuries. Two of the most commons causes seem to be the glenohumeral dislocation and the proximal humerus fractures. The axillary nerve may sustain a simple contusion, or its terminal elements may be avulsed from the deltoid muscle. Compressive neuropathy in the quadrilateral space also has been reported (quadrilateral space syndrome, Calhill and Palmer, 1983). The axillary nerve injuries incidence represents less than 1% of all nerve injuries. Aim: The purpose of this study was to analyze outcome in patients, who presented with injuries to the axillary nerve. Material and methods: We report a series of 15 cases of axillary nerve lesions, which were operated between 1995 and 2002. These injuries resulted from shoulder injury either with or without fracture and or dislocation. Patients were operated between 3 to 6 months after trauma and an anterior deltopectoral approach was usually followed during surgery. The follow up period ranged from 1 to 8 years. Results: The results were considered as satisfactory in 11 out of 15 axillary nerve lesions. According to clinical examination, of the function of the shoulder and the muscle strength the results were classified as excellent in 5 cases, good in 6 cases and poor in 4 cases. Conclusions: If indicated, nerve repair can lead to useful function in carefully selected patients

Purpose: We have sometimes observed paralysis of the long portion of the triceps in patients operated after traumatic damage to the axillary nerve. In anatomy textbooks, the motor branch of the long portion of the triceps arises from the radial nerve within the triceps. We studied the position of the motor branch of the long portion of the triceps in order to better detail its origin. Material and methods: Group I: this group included nine patients with trauma-induced lesions of the axillary nerve associated with clinical involvement of the long portion of the triceps. Group II: this group was composed of 20 cadaver specimens of the secondary posterior trunks. Group III: fif-teen approaches to the subclavian plexus with dissection of the secondary posterior trunk. Lesions to the axillary nerve were retrieved from the operation reports in group I. The origin of the motor branch of the long portion of the triceps was identified in group II. The same origin was identified by neurostimulation in group III. Results: In group I there were six lesions of the axillary nerve situated a mean 10 mm from the division of the secondary posterior trunk and three lesions of the secondary posterior trunk. There were four type IV lesions and five type V lesions. In group II, the motor branch of the long portion of the triceps arose a mean 6 mm from the division of the secondary posterior trunk in 13 cases, at the division in five cases, and 10 mm downstream in two cases, but never from the radial nerve. In group III, the branch of long portion of the triceps arose a men 4.5 mm from the division of the secondary posterior trunk in 11 cases, and at the division in four cases, but never from the radial nerve. Discussion: In patients with trauma to the axillary nerve with paralysis of the long portion of the triceps, lesions to the axillary nerve occur proximally and are severe. In our study, the motor branch of the long portion of the triceps always arose from the axillary nerve or the secondary posterior branch. This shows that paralysis of the long portion of the triceps is a sign of poor prognosis in patients with traumatic lesions to the axillary nerve. This association is for us an element in favour of a proximal and serious lesion to the axillary nerve. Conclusion: Involvement of the long portion of the triceps must be searched for in patients with traumatic lesions to the axillary nerve. Paralysis of the long portion of the triceps is a sign of a serious lesion requiring early surgical repair before two months

We have assessed the final strength of the deltoid in 121 patients who had repair of isolated or combined lesions of the axillary (circumflex) nerve and were available for statistical analysis. Successful or useful results were achieved in 85% after grafting of isolated lesions. The strength was statistically better when patients had grafting of the axillary nerve within 5.3 months from the time of injury. The dramatic decrease in the rate of success seen with longer delays suggests that surgery should be undertaken within three months of injury. A statistically significant downward trend of the rate of success was noted with increasing age. The force and level of injury to the shoulder play an important role in the type, combination and level of nerve damage and the incidence of associated rotator-cuff, vascular and other injuries to the upper limb. Management of isolated and combined lesions of the axillary nerve after injury to the shoulder needs to be thorough and systematic

Rupture of the pectoralis major (PM) tendon is a rare yet severe injury. Several techniques have been described for PM fixation including a transosseus technique, when cortical buttons are placed at the superior, middle and inferior PM tendon insertion positions. The concern with this technique is the risk that bicortical drilling poses to the axillary nerve as it courses posteriorly to the humerus. This cadaveric study investigates the proximity of the posterior branch of the axillary nerve to the drill positions for transosseus PM tendon repair. Drills were placed through the humerus at the superior, middle and inferior insertions of the PM tendon and the distance between these positions and the axillary nerve, which had previously been marked, was measured using computed tomography (CT) imaging. This investigation demonstrates that the superior border of PM tendon insertion is the fixation position that poses the highest risk of damage to the axillary nerve. Caution should be used when performing bicortical drilling during cortical button PM tendon repair, especially when drilling at the superior border of the PM insertion. We describe ‘safe’ and ‘danger’ zones for transosseus drilling of the humerus reflecting the risk posed to the axillary nerve

Abstract. Nerve transfer has become a common and often effective reconstructive strategy for proximal and complex peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb. This case-based discussion explores the principles and potential benefits of nerve transfer surgery and offers in-depth discussion of several established and valuable techniques including: motor transfer for elbow flexion after musculocutaneous nerve injury, deltoid reanimation for axillary nerve palsy, intrinsic re-innervation following proximal ulnar nerve repair, and critical sensory recovery despite non-reconstructable median nerve lesions

Abstract. Objective. Radial to axillary nerve and spinal accessory (XI) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfers are standard procedures to restore function after C5 brachial plexus dysfunction. The anterior approach to the SSN may miss concomitant pathology at the suprascapular notch and sacrifices lateral trapezius function, resulting in poor restoration of shoulder external rotation. A posterior approach allows decompression and visualisation of the SSN at the notch and distal coaptation of the medial XI branch. The medial triceps has a double fascicle structure that may be coapted to both the anterior and posterior division of the axillary nerve, whilst preserving the stabilising effect of the long head of triceps at the glenohumeral joint. Reinnervation of two shoulder abductors and two external rotators may confer advantages over previous approaches with improved external rotation range of motion and strength. Methods. Review of the clinical outcomes of 22 patients who underwent a double nerve transfer from XI and radial nerves. Motor strength was evaluated using the MRC scale and grade 4 was defined as the threshold for success. Results. 18/22 patients had adequate follow-up (Mean: 29.5 months). Of these, 72.2% achieved ≥grade 4 power of shoulder abduction and a mean range of motion of 103°. 64.7% achieved ≥grade 4 external rotation with a mean range of motion of 99.6°. Conclusions. The results suggest the use of the combined nerve transfer for restoration of shoulder function via a posterior approach, involving the medial head branch of triceps to the axillary nerve and the XI to SSN

The August 2023 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup360 looks at: Motor control or strengthening exercises for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain? A multi-arm randomized controlled trial; Does the choice of antibiotic prophylaxis influence reoperation rate in primary shoulder arthroplasty?; Common shoulder injuries in sport: grading the evidence; The use of medial support screw was associated with axillary nerve injury after plate fixation of proximal humeral fracture using a minimally invasive deltoid-splitting approach; MRI predicts outcomes of conservative treatment in patients with lateral epicondylitis; Association between surgeon volume and patient outcomes after elective shoulder arthroplasty; Arthroscopic decompression of calcific tendinitis without cuff repair; Functional outcome after nonoperative management of minimally displaced greater tuberosity fractures and predictors of poorer patient experience

Aims. Resection of the proximal humerus for the primary malignant bone tumour sometimes requires en bloc resection of the deltoid. However, there is no information in the literature which helps a surgeon decide whether to preserve the deltoid or not. The aim of this study was to determine whether retaining the deltoid at the time of resection would increase the rate of local recurrence. We also sought to identify the variables that persuade expert surgeons to choose a deltoid sparing rather than deltoid resecting procedure. Patients and Methods. We reviewed 45 patients who had undergone resection of a primary malignant tumour of the proximal humerus. There were 29 in the deltoid sparing group and 16 in the deltoid resecting group. Imaging studies were reviewed to assess tumour extension and soft-tissue involvement. The presence of a fat rim separating the tumour from the deltoid on MRI was particularly noted. The cumulative probability of local recurrence was calculated in a competing risk scenario. Results. There was no significant difference (adjusted p = 0.89) in the cumulative probability of local recurrence between the deltoid sparing (7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1 to 20) and the deltoid resecting group (26%, 95% CI 8 to 50). Patients were more likely to be selected for a deltoid sparing procedure if they presented with a small tumour (p = 0.0064) with less bone involvement (p = 0.032) and a continuous fat rim on MRI (p = 0.002) and if the axillary nerve could be identified (p = 0.037). Conclusion. A deltoid sparing procedure can provide good local control after resection of the proximal humerus for a primary malignant bone tumour. A smaller tumour, the presence of a continuous fat rim and the identification of the axillary nerve on pre-operative MRI will persuade surgeons to opt for a deltoid resecting procedure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1244–9

We reviewed 101 patients with injuries of the terminal branches of the infraclavicular brachial plexus sustained between 1997 and 2009. Four patterns of injury were identified: 1) anterior glenohumeral dislocation (n = 55), in which the axillary and ulnar nerves were most commonly injured, but the axillary nerve was ruptured in only two patients (3.6%); 2) axillary nerve injury, with or without injury to other nerves, in the absence of dislocation of the shoulder (n = 20): these had a similar pattern of nerve involvement to those with a known dislocation, but the axillary nerve was ruptured in 14 patients (70%); 3) displaced proximal humeral fracture (n = 15), in which nerve injury resulted from medial displacement of the humeral shaft: the fracture was surgically reduced in 13 patients; and 4) hyperextension of the arm (n = 11): these were characterised by disruption of the musculocutaneous nerve. There was variable involvement of the median and radial nerves with the ulnar nerve being least affected. Surgical intervention is not needed in most cases of infraclavicular injury associated with dislocation of the shoulder. Early exploration of the nerves should be considered in patients with an axillary nerve palsy without dislocation of the shoulder and for musculocutaneous nerve palsy with median and/or radial nerve palsy. Urgent operation is needed in cases of nerve injury resulting from fracture of the humeral neck to relieve pressure on nerves

Residual muscle weakness in obstetric brachial plexus palsy results in soft-tissue contractures which limit the functional range of movement and lead to progressive glenoid dysplasia and joint instability. We describe the results of surgical treatment in 98 patients (mean age 2.5 years, 0.5 to 9.0) for the correction of active abduction of the shoulder. The patients underwent transfer of the latissimus dorsi and teres major muscles, release of contractures of subscapularis pectoralis major and minor, and axillary nerve decompression and neurolysis (the modified Quad procedure). The transferred muscles were sutured to the teres minor muscle, not to a point of bony insertion. The mean pre-operative active abduction was 45° (20° to 90°). At a mean follow-up of 4.8 years (2.0 to 8.7), the mean active abduction was 162° (100° to 180°) while 77 (78.6%) of the patients had active abduction of 160° or more. No decline in abduction was noted among the 29 patients (29.6%) followed up for six years or more. This procedure involving release of the contracted internal rotators of the shoulder combined with decompression and neurolysis of the axillary nerve greatly improves active abduction in young patients with muscle imbalance secondary to obstetric brachial plexus palsy

Physiological studies have revealed that the central nervous system controls groups of muscle fibers in a very efficient manner. Within a single skeletal muscle, the central nervous system independently controls individual muscle segments to produce a particular motor outcome. Mechanomyographic studies on the deltoid muscle have revealed that the deltoid muscle, commonly described as having three anatomical segments, is composed of at least seven functional muscle segments, which all have the potential to be at an important level independently coordinated by the central nervous system.[. 1. ] In this study we tried to anatomically describe and quantify these different functional segments within the deltoid muscle, based on the branching out pattern of the axillary nerve. Forty-four deltoids of 22 embalmed adult cadavers, were analyzed. The axillary nerve was carefully dissected together with his anterior and posterior branch upon invasion into the muscle. According to the pattern of fiber distribution and their fascial embalmment, we then carefully splitted the deltoid muscle into different portions each being innervated by a major branch of the axillary nerve. The position and volume of each segment in relation to the whole muscle was derived. In 3 cases the axillary nerve branched out in 8 major divisions. In 22 out of 44 cases (50%), the axillary nerve branched out in 7 principal parts. A branching out pattern of 6 major divisions occurred in 14 out of 44 cases. Finally we found a division in 5 major branches in 5 of the specimens. In general, both posterior and anterior peripheral segments seemed to have the largest volume. In nearly all (93%) cases, the central segments were smaller in weight and volume compared to the more peripheral segments. Based on the innervation pattern of the deltoid muscle a segmentation in 5 up to 8 major segments seem to be found. This confirms from anatomical point of view earlier reports of functional differentiation within the deltoid muscle

Analysis of orthopaedic malpractice claims has shown that highest impact allegations (highest payment dollars per claim) were those that were related to failure to protect anatomic structures in surgical fields. The prevalence of subclinical peripheral neurologic deficit following reverse and anatomic shoulder arthroplasty has been reported to be 47% and 4%, respectively. We propose the following five rules in order to avoid neurovascular injury during shoulder arthroplasty cases:. Pre-operative planning would assure a smooth operation without intra-operative difficulties. Adequate planning would include appropriate imaging, obtaining previous operative reports, complete pre-operative neurovascular examination and requesting the necessary operative equipment. Tug test: It is crucial to palpate the axillary nerve and be aware of its location. The tug test is a systematic technique for locating and protecting the axillary nerve. Neuromonitoring has been utilised in shoulder surgery in the past. Nagda et al showed that nerve alerts during shoulder arthroplasty occurred 56.7% of the time and 50% of the events were with the arm in abduction, external rotation and extension; 76.7% of signals returned to normal with retractor removal and change in arm positioning. We recommend removing all retractors and returning the arm to neutral position several times during surgery, especially during the glenoid exposure when the arm is in abduction and external rotation. Newer commercially available nerve stimulators are extremely useful in locating and protecting neurovascular structures. We recommend brachial plexus exploration and axillary nerve dissection with the aid of a nerve stimulator in all revision cases. Availability of a nerve/microvascular surgeon as an assistant in revision cases for brachial plexus exploration using a microscope is crucial for successful revision surgery

In reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), a high complication rate is noted in the international literature (24.7%), and limited local literature is available. The complications in our developing health system, with high HIV, tuberculosis and metabolic syndrome prevalence may be different from that in developed health systems where the literature largely emanates from. The aim of this study is to describe the complications and complication rate following RSA in a South African cohort. An analytical, cross-sectional study was done where all patients’ who received RSA over an 11 year period at a tertiary hospital were evaluated. One-hundred-and-twenty-six primary RSA patients met the inclusion criteria and a detailed retrospective evaluation of their demographics, clinical variables and complication associated with their shoulder arthroplasty were assessed. All fracture, revision and tumour resection arthroplasties were excluded, and a minimum of 6 months follow up was required. A primary RSA complication rate of 19.0% (24/126) was noted, with the most complications occurring after 90 days at 54.2% (13/24). Instability was the predominant delayed complication at 61.5% (8/13) and sepsis being the most common in the early days at 45.5% (5/11). Haematoma formation, hardware failure and axillary nerve injury were also noted at 4.2% each (1/24). Keeping in mind the immense difference in socioeconomical status and patient demographics in a third world country the RSA complication rate in this study correlates with the known international consensus. This also proves that RSA is still a suitable option for rotator cuff arthropathy and glenohumeral osteoarthritis even in an economically constrained environment like South Africa

A fracture of the tuberosity is associated with 16% of anterior glenohumeral dislocations. Manipulation of these injuries in the emergency department is safe with less than 1% risk of fracture propagation. However, there is a risk of associated neurological injury, recurrent instability and displacement of the greater tuberosity fragment. The risks and outcomes of these complications have not previously been reported. The purpose of this study was to establish the incidence and outcome of complications associated with this pattern of injury. We reviewed 339 consecutive glenohumeral dislocations with associated greater tuberosity fractures from a prospective trauma database. Documentation and radiographs were studied and the incidence of neurovascular compromise, greater tuberosity fragment migration and intervention and recurrent instability recorded. The mean age was 61 years (range, 18–96) with a female preponderance (140:199 male:female). At presentation 24% (n=78) patients had a nerve injury, with axillary nerve being most common (n=43, 55%). Of those patients with nerve injuries 15 (19%) did not resolve. Greater tuberosity displacement >5mm was observed in 36% (n=123) of patients with 40 undergoing acute surgery, the remainder did not due to comorbidities or patient choice. Persistent displacement after reduction accounted for 60 cases, later displacement within 6 weeks occurred in 63 patients. Recurrent instability occurred in 4 (1%) patients. Patient reported outcomes were poor with average EQ5D being 0.73, QDASH score of 16 and Oxford Shoulder Score of 41. Anterior glenohumeral dislocation with associated greater tuberosity fracture is common with poor long term patient reported outcomes. Our results demonstrate there is a high rate of neurological deficits at presentation with the majority resolving spontaneously. Recurrent instability is rare. Late tuberosity fragment displacement occurs in 18% of patients and regular follow-up for 6 weeks is recommended to detect this

Proximal humeral fractures are common fractures that may lead to severe functional disability. In open reduction and internal fixation of these fractures deltopectoral approach is pereferred by many surgeons being an internervous plane and because of familiarity. However when this aprroach is used extensive soft tissue dissection is inevitable and control of the commonly displaced tuberculum majus fragment which is displaced posterolateraly is difficult. In this prospective study we compared deltopectoral and lateral deltoid splitting approach by using the same fixation material. Between October 2005 and March 2007 42 patients were included in the study group. In Group A a lateral deltoid split approch and in Group B deltopectoral approach was used. Group A consisted of 22 cases; mean age 60.95 (26–90 years old); 12 female and 10 male, Group B 20 cases; mean age 56.9 (24–86 years old); 13 female, 7 male. Philos locking plate fixation (Synthes) was used in every case. When deltoid split approach was used axillary nerve was explored and protected, a C-arm was used in every case. Functional results and compications were compared at the follow up visits. When radiological results were compared the reduction of head and tubercular fragments were better in deltoid splitting approach. The Constant score was better in Group A at an earlier time period 68.9 vs 58.4 (p< 0.01). At the 6th month follow up the difference between Constant scores was not significant, 85.9 vs 85.2 (p> 0.05). Axillary nerve lesion due to lateral deltoid split exposure was not observed in any of the cases. Lateral deltoid split exposure with identification and protection of the axillary nerve facilitates 270 degrees control of the head and tubercular fragments in AO/ASIF type B and C fractures. Additional fixation of tubercular fragments by sutures passed through cuff tendons and fixed to the plate helps to maintain the reduction. Compared to double incision minimal invasive approach a shother plate is used without any inadvertant risk to the axillary nerve. Better Constant scores are achieved at an earlier time. We recommend this technique in AO/ASIF type B and C fractures

Introduction. Osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint leads to global degeneration of the shoulder and often results in humeral or glenoid osteophytes. It is established that the axillary neurovascular bundle is in close proximity to the glenohumeral capsule. Similar to other compressive neuropathies, osteophytic impingement of the axillary nerve could result in axillary nerve symptoms. The purpose of this study was to compare the proximity of the axillary neurovascular bundle to the inferior humerus in shoulders to determine distance of the neurovascular bundle as the osteophyte (goat's beard) of glenohumeral osteoarthritis develops. Methods. In this IRB approved study, preoperative MRI's of 98 shoulders (89 patients) with primary osteoarthritis (OA group) were compared to 91 shoulders (86 patients) with anterior instability (Control group). For MRI measurements (mm) two coronal-oblique T1 or proton density weighted images were selected for each patient located at 5 and 6 o'clock position of the glenoid in the parasagittal plane. Humeral head diameter to standardize the glenohumeral measurements, size of the spurs, and 6 measurements between osseus structures and axillary neurovascular bundle were obtained on each image using a calibrated measurement system (Stryker Office PACS Power Viewer). Level of significance was set at p>.05. Results. Since results were both significant at 5 and 6 o'clock, for clarity we will only give the results at 6 o'clock. Humeral head osteophytes were present in 52% (51/86) of arthritic patients with an average size of 9.90 mm (range 0–24.31). Distance between humeral head or inferior osteophyte and neurovascular bundle was significantly decreased (p<0.05) in the OA group, 19.74 mm (range 2.80–35.12) compared to the control group 23.8 mm (14.25–31.89). If we compare the same distance between the Control group, OA group with a spur and OA group without a spur, the difference is only significant between the Control group and OA with spur. (p<0.05) In non-arthritic patients, the neurovascular bundle was closest to the inferior glenoid rim in all patients (91/91). By contrast, the neurovascular bundle was closest to the humeral head in 26.5% (26/98) of arthritic patients. Among these 26 patients, a large humeral head osteophyte was present in 96% (25/26). The neurovascular bundle distance and humeral head osteophyte size were inversely correlated (r=−0.45 at 5 o'clock, r=−0.546 at 6 o'clock) in the arthritic group (p<0.05). Discussion. The axillary neurovascular bundle was significantly closer to the osseous structures (humerus) in arthritic patients compared to non-arthritic patients (p<0.05). The neurovascular bundle was significantly closer to the bone when there was a humeral osteophyte, and the distance was inversely proportional to humeral osteophyte size (p<0.05). This study indicates humeral osteophytes are capable of encroaching on the axillary nerve. Axillary nerve entrapment may be a contributing and treatable factor of pain in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis

Fractures of the proximal humerus can offer a difficult surgical challenge particularly if they occur in elderly patients and/or are a complex fracture configuration. Much of the morbidity of the surgery relates to the extensile delto-pectoral approach traditionally used for operative treatment of these fractures. A minimally invasive technique for approaching these fractures has was developed using a proximal deltoid split approach at the anterior edge of the deltoid and sliding a precontoured proximal humeral locking plate submuscularly after provisional fracture reduction. This technique was tested in a cadaver model to identify “safe” and “at risk” holes in the plate for percutaneous fixation in relation to the axillary nerve. A case series of eighteen patients who had surgery using this technique were reviewed. All patients achieved acceptable reductions and went on to unite without any signs of AVN or implant failure. One patient had a transient sensory disturbance in an axillary nerve distribution post op. One patient has asymptomatic fibrous union of the greater tuberosity. Minimally invasive plate fixation using a lateral deltoid split approach is technically possible with excellent results. The danger zone around the axillary nerve has been identified and should be avoided with percutaneous fixation utilising this procedure. A jig to allow accurate MIPO fixation has been developed

The patterns of nerve and associated skeletal injury were reviewed in 84 patients referred to the brachial plexus service who had damage predominantly to the infraclavicular brachial plexus and its branches. Patients fell into four categories: 1. Anterior glenohumeral dislocation (46 cases); 2. ‘Occult’ shoulder dislocation or scapular fracture (17 cases); 3. Humeral neck fracture (11 cases); 4. Arm hyperextension (9 cases). The axillary (38/46) and ulnar (36/46) nerves were most commonly injured as a result of glenohumeral dislocation. The axillary nerve was ruptured in only 2 patients who had suffered high energy trauma. Ulnar nerve recovery was often incomplete. ‘Occult’ dislocation refers to patients who had no recorded shoulder dislocation but the history was suggestive that dislocation had occurred with spontaneous reduction. These patients and those with scapular fractures had a similar pattern of nerve involvement to those with known dislocation, but the axillary nerve was ruptured in 11 of 17 cases. In cases of humeral neck fracture, nerve injury resulted from medial displacement of the humeral shaft. Surgery was performed in 7 cases to reduce and fix the fracture. Arm hyperextension cases were characterised by injury to the musculocutaneous nerve, with the nerve being ruptured in 8 of 9. Five had humeral shaft fracture or elbow dislocation. There was variable involvement of the median and radial nerves, with the ulnar nerve being least affected. Most cases of infraclavicular brachial plexus injury associated with shoulder dislocation can be managed without operation. Early nerve exploration and repair should be considered for:. Axillary nerve palsy without recorded shoulder dislocation or in association with fracture of the scapula. Musculocutaneous nerve palsy with median and/or radial nerve palsy. Urgent operation is necessary for nerve injury resulting from fracture of the humeral neck to relieve ongoing pressure on the nerves

Plate fixation of the proximal humerus fractures may now be more desirable with the use of a biological approach by limiting surgical insult and allowing accelerated rehabilitation by a solid fixation. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive plating of the proximal humerus using validated disease-specific measures. During a period of one year, thirty patients were operated with use of the LCP proximal humerus plate (Synthes) through a 3cm lateral deltoid splitting approach and a second 2 cm incision at the deltoid insertion. The axillary nerve was palped and easily protected during insertion. Only two-part (N=22) and three-part impacted valgus type (N=8) were included in this study since they can be reduced indirectly thru this percutaneous technique. The average follow-up was thirteen months (eight to twenty months). All patients had the Constant and DASH evaluations. All fractures healed within the first six months with no loss of correction. The surgical technique was found easy by all surgeons, the axillary nerve was palpated and protect with this new technique. No infection or avascular necrosis were seen. No axillary nerve deficit was identified. At the last follow-up (average nineteen months, twelve months minimum), the median Constant score was sixty-eight points, with an age ajusted score of seventy-six. The mean DASH score was twenty-seven points. Only age was independently predictive of both the Constant and DASH functional scores. Patients improved until one year of follow up. Percutaneous insertion of a locking proximal humerus plate is safe and produces gives good early functional and radiologic outcomes. Recuperation from a proximal humerus fracture can be seen until one year

Purpose: The objective of the study was to perform a prospective evaluation of thermal capsulorraphy for the treatment of multidirectional instability of the shoulder. Summary of Methods: Over a period of two years, 19 patients with multidirectional instability were treated with thermal shrinkage. Fifteen patients had involuntary dislocation and four voluntary. The predominant direction of instability was anterior/inferior in 10, posterior in 5 and multiple directions in 4. Patients were followed for a minimum of two years or until surgical failure and recurrence of symptomatology. Postoperatively patients were immobilised in a sling for a period of 3 weeks and were reviewed at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months and then at six monthly intervals. The Western Ontario shoulder Instability Index was used as a clinical outcome measure as well as subjective and objective evaluation of patient’s function, range of motion, pain and instability. Results: Nine patients had recurrence of their instability occurring at an average of nine months following their surgical procedure (range 7–14 months). One patient had axillary nerve dysfunction postoperatively with difficulty in abducting the shoulder. Three patients had sensory dysaesthesia related to the axillary nerve territory. All neurological subjective evaluations recovered within 9 months. Four of five patients with a predominantly posterior direction to their instability failed this surgical procedure. Only 2 of 10 (20%) with predominantly anterior instability failed. Conclusion: Analysis of patients with multidirectional laxity determined that thermal capsulorraphy had a high failure rate (9/19, 47%) with associated significant postoperative complications including axillary nerve dysaesthesias and stiffness

Introduction and purpose: Different neurovascular structures may be damaged when making arthroscopic portals to the shoulder joint. The description of new portals poses new challenges. The goal of the present study is to provide an update on the anatomic vasculonervous responses of the current approaches to shoulder arthroscopy. Materials and methods: 16 fresh cadavers were systematically dissected. The most usual arthroscopic portals were marked and, then, the dissection started on a plane-to-plane basis. Relationships were identified and distances were measured to the most important neurovascular elements with a standard caliber (accuracy: 0.5mm). Results: The portals studied and the structures at risk were the following:. * Posterior portal: anterior branch of the axillary nerve and posterior circumflex artery 3.4 cm (range: 1.4 – 5); cutaneous branch of the axillary nerve 6.3 cm (range: 3.8 – 8.3), suprascapular nerve 2.8 cm (range: 2.1–3.3). * Anterosuperior portal: main branch of the musculocutaneous nerve 6.5 cm (range: 3.8 – 11). * Lateral subacromial portal: axillary nerve and posterior circumflex artery 3.7 cm (range: 2– 5.5). * Anteroinferior subaxillary portal 4 cm (range: 3.1 –6). * Supraspinatus portal: suprascapular nerve 3.2 cm (range: 2.4 – 4). Conclusions: Although the crucial elements at risk when performing a shoulder arthroscopy are multiple, the axillary and suprascapular nerves were the most vulnerable structures to the different approaches. In spite of the presence of the “safe areas” described above, the neurovascular bundle was frequently affected by passage through the anteroinferior subaxillary portal. The results suggest that the use of this portal is not safe for routine arthroscopic practice

Abstract. Background/Objectives. The incidence of reverse total shoulder replacement (rTSR) implantation is increasing globally, but apprehension exists regarding complications and associated challenges. We retrospectively analysed the senior author's series of rTSR from a tertiary centre using the VAIOS shoulder system, a modular 4th generation implant. We hypothesised that the revision rTSR cohort would have less favourable outcomes and more complications. Methods. 114 patients underwent rTSR with the VAIOS system, over 7 years. The primary outcome was implant survival. Secondary outcomes were Oxford shoulder scores (OSS), radiographic analysis (scapular notching, tuberosity osteolysis, and periprosthetic radiolucent lines) and complications. Results. There were 55 Primary rTSR, 31 Revision rTSR and 28 Trauma rTSR. Implant survival: Primary rTSR- 0 revisions, average 3.35-year follow-up. Revision rTSR-1 revision (4.17%), average 3.52-year follow-up. Trauma rTSR- 1 revision (3.57%), average 4.56-year follow-up OSS: Average OSS improved from 15.39 to 33.8 (Primary rTSR) and from 15.11 to 29.1 (Revision rTSR). Average post-operative OSS for the Trauma rTSR was 31.4 Radiological analysis and complications: Low incidence of scapular notching One hairline fracture below the tip of stem, noted incidentally, which required no treatment. One periprosthetic fracture after alcohol related fall. Treated non-surgically One joint infection requiring two-stage revision to rTSR. One dislocation noted at 2 year follow up. This patient had undergone nerve grafting within 6 months of rTSR for axillary nerve injury sustained during the original fracture dislocation. One acromial fracture with tibial and distal humeral fracture after a fall. Conclusions. The 4th generation modular VAIOS implant is a reliable option for various indications. The revision rTSR cohort had favourable outcomes with low complication rates. In this series, early-to-medium term results suggest lower revision rates and good functional outcomes when compared to published reports. We plan to monitor long-term implant survivorship and patient reported outcomes. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

The standard approach is through the deltopectoral interval. Among patients with prior incisions, one makes every effort to either utilise the old incision or to incorporate it into a longer incision that will allow one to approach the deltopectoral interval and retract the deltoid laterally. The deltopectoral interval is most easily developed just distal to the clavicle, where there is a natural infraclavicular triangle of fat that separates the deltoid and pectoralis major muscles even in very scarred or stiff shoulders. Typically, the deltoid is retracted laterally leaving the cephalic vein on the medial aspect of the exposure. The anterior border of the deltoid is mobilised from the clavicle to its insertion on the humerus. The anterior portion of the deltoid insertion together with the more distal periosteum of the humerus may be elevated slightly. The next step is to identify the plane between the conjoined tendon group and the subscapularis muscle. Dissection in this area must be done very carefully due to the close proximity of the neurovascular group, the axillary nerve, and the musculocutaneous nerve. Scar is then released from around the base of the coracoid. The subacromial space is freed of scar and the shoulder is examined for range of motion. Particularly among patients with prior rotator cuff surgery, there may be severe scarring in the subacromial space. Internal rotation of the arm with dissection between the remaining rotator cuff and deltoid is critical to develop this plane. If external rotation is less than 30 degrees, one can consider incising the subscapularis off bone rather than through its tendinous substance. For every 1 cm that the subscapularis is advanced medially, one gains approximately 20 to 30 degrees of external rotation. The rotator interval between the subscapularis and supraspinatus is then incised. This release is then continued inferiorly to incise the inferior shoulder capsule from the neck of the humerus. This is performed by proceeding from anterior to posterior with progressive external rotation of the humerus staying directly on the bone with electrocautery and great care to protect the axillary nerve. The key for glenoid exposure as well as improvement in motion is deltoid mobilization, a large inferior capsular release, aggressive humeral head cut and osteophyte removal

Abstract. Introduction. Local anaesthetic injections are regularly used for perioperative pain relief for shoulder arthroscopies. In our practice all shoulder arthroscopies were performed under general aneasthesia supplemented by perioperative subacromial local anaesthetic injections or landmark guided axillary nerve together with suprascapular nerve injections. We compared pain relief achieved with these two methods. We hypothesized that the selective nerve blocks would provide better post operative pain relief as described in literature. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on two patient groups with 17 patients each. Group one patients received 20mls 50:50 mixture of 1% lignocaine and 0.5% chirocaine injections before and after start of procedure and group two patients received 20 mls of chirocaine around the axillary and suprascapular nerves. VAS scores were collected at 1 and 4 hours and analgesia taken during the first 24 hours was recorded. Results. No significant difference in pain scores was noted but analgesia requirements in the nerve block group were higher. Conclusion. Landmark guided nerve blocks did not show any advantage over subacromial local anaesthetic in our study. This is in contrast to published literature and we believe subacromial injections are more reliable and reproducible. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Reverse total shoulder replacement (RTSR) depends on adequate deltoid function for a successful outcome. However, the anterior deltoid and/or axillary nerve may be damaged due to prior procedures or injury. The purpose of this study was to determine the compensatory muscle forces required for scapular plane elevation following RTSR when the anterior deltoid is deficient. The soft tissues were removed from six cadaver shoulders, except for tendon attachments. After implantation of the RTSR, the shoulders were mounted on a custom-made shoulder simulator to determine the mean force in each muscle required to achieve 30° and 60° of scapular plane elevation. Two conditions were tested: 1) Control with an absent supraspinatus and infraspinatus; and 2) Control with anterior deltoid deficiency. Anterior deltoid deficiency resulted in a mean increase of 195% in subscapularis force at 30° when compared with the control (p = 0.02). At 60°, the subscapularis force increased a mean of 82% (p < 0.001) and the middle deltoid force increased a mean of 26% (p = 0.04). Scapular plane elevation may still be possible following an RTSR in the setting of anterior deltoid deficiency. When the anterior deltoid is deficient, there is a compensatory increase in the force required by the subscapularis and middle deltoid. Attempts to preserve the subscapularis, if present, might maximise post-operative function

After establishing anatomical feasibility, functional reconstruction to replace the anterolateral part of the deltoid was performed in 20 consecutive patients with irreversible deltoid paralysis using the sternoclavicular portion of the pectoralis major muscle. The indication for reconstruction was deltoid deficiency combined with massive rotator cuff tear in 11 patients, brachial plexus palsy in seven, and an isolated axillary nerve lesion in two. All patients were followed clinically and radiologically for a mean of 70 months (24 to 125). The mean gender-adjusted Constant score increased from 28% (15% to 54%) to 51% (19% to 83%). Forward elevation improved by a mean of 37°, abduction by 30° and external rotation by 9°. The pectoralis inverse plasty may be used as a salvage procedure in irreversible deltoid deficiency, providing subjectively satisfying results. Active forward elevation and abduction can be significantly improved

Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDTT) is technically challenging. In order to clarify the local structural anatomy, we undertook a morphometric study using six complete cadavers (12 shoulders). Measurements were made from the tendon to the nearby neurovascular structures with the arm in two positions: flexed and internally rotated, and adducted in neutral rotation. The tendon was then transferred and measurements were taken from the edge of the tendon to a reference point on the humeral head in order to assess the effect of a novel two-stage release on the excursion of the tendon. With the shoulder flexed and internally rotated, the mean distances between the superior tendon edge and the radial nerve, brachial artery, axillary nerve and posterior circumflex artery were 30 mm (26 to 34), 28 mm (17 to 39), 21 mm (12 to 28) and 15 mm (10 to 21), respectively. The mean distance between the inferior tendon edge and the radial nerve, brachial artery and profunda brachii artery was 18 mm (8 to 27), 22 mm (15 to 32) and 14 mm (7 to 21), respectively. Moving the arm to a neutral position reduced these distances. A mean of 15 mm (8 to 21) was gained from a standard soft-tissue release, and 32 mm (20 to 45) from an extensile release. These figures help to define further the structural anatomy of this region and the potential for transfer of the latissimus dorsi tendon. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:517–22

Although new locking plates allows for secure fixation of osteoporotic fractures in the proximal humerus, extensive soft tissue dissection is needed for their insertion. We report on a prospective clinical trial of the first thirty patients treated with plating of the proximal humerus though a minimally invasive percutaneous approach. All fractures healed within the first 6 months with no avascular necrosis or axillary nerve injury. At the latest follow-up, the median Constant score was sixty-eight and the mean DASH score was twenty-seven. This study suggests that percutaneous plating can be a safe and effective method of fixation. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive plating of the proximal humerus using validated disease-specific measures. Percutaneous insertion of a locking proximal humerus plate is safe and produces good early functional and radiologic outcomes. Plate fixation of the proximal humerus fractures may now be more desirable with the use of a biological approach by limiting surgical insult and allowing accelerated rehabilitation. All fractures healed within the first six months with no loss of correction. Two reoperations were needed to remove intra-articular screws placed too long. No infection or avascular necrosis were seen. At the lastest follow-up, the median Constant score was sixty-eight points, with an age ajusted score of seventy-six. The mean DASH score was twenty-seven points. Only age was independantly predictive of both the Constant and DASH functional scores. During a period of one year, thirty patients were operated with use of the LCP proximal humerus plate (Synthes) through a 3cm lateral deltoid splitting approach and a second 2 cm incision at the deltoid insertion. The axillary nerve was palped and easily protected during insertion. Only two-part (N=22) and three-part impacted valgus type (N=8) were included in this study since they can be reduced indirectly thru this percutaneous technique. The average follow-up was thirteen months (eight to twenty months). All patients had the Constant and DASH evaluations

Patients with pain and loss of shoulder function due to nonunion of a fracture of the proximal third of the humerus may benefit from reverse total shoulder replacement. This paper reports a prospective, multicentre study, involving three hospitals and three surgeons, of 35 patients (28 women, seven men) with a mean age of 69 years (46 to 83) who underwent a reverse total shoulder replacement for the treatment of nonunion of a fracture of the proximal humerus. Using Checchia’s classification, nine nonunions were type I, eight as type II, 12 as type III and six as type IV. The mean follow-up was 51 months (24 to 99). Post-operatively, the patients had a significant decrease in pain (p < 0.001), and a significant improvement in flexion, abduction, external rotation and Constant score (p < 0.001), but not in internal rotation. A total of nine complications were recorded in seven patients: six dislocations, one glenoid loosening in a patient who had previously suffered dislocation, one transitory paresis of the axillary nerve and one infection. Reverse total shoulder replacement may lead to a significant reduction in pain, improvement in function and a high degree of satisfaction. However, the rate of complications, particularly dislocation, was high. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1239–43

Proximal humerus is the common site for primary bone malignancies that surgical treatment consists of wide excision of the tumor and reconstruction with tumor resection prosthesis or allograft. The ultimate function of the shoulder depends on the degree of sacrification of adjacent structures. Thirty-two patients with primary malignancies have been treated by wide excision and endoprosthetic replacement by senior author between 1989–2005 12 patients were female, 20 patients were male, mean age was 26,6 years (range 7–69 years). Histological diagnosis was 14 osteosarcoma, 4 Ewing’s sarcoma, 4 chondrosarcoma, 3 parosteal sarcoma, 4 giant cell tumor, 1 aneurysmal bone cyst, 2 synovial sarcoma. Synovial sarcoma, osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to excision. Mean follow-up was 50,4 months (range 6–153 months). Oncologic results were 20 patients NED (no evidence of disease), 2 patients AWD (alive with disease), 10 patients DOD (died of disease). Functional outcome was scored according to Musculo-Skeletal System Tumor Society (MSTS) rating scale, 7 patients were excellent, 22 patients were good and 3 patients were poor. Regarding complications 2 patients developed local recurrence, 2 patients had superficial infection. Infected cases were treated by systemic antibiotic treatment. All patients had dexterity of the hand and elbow. Regarding shoulder abduction and forward flexion, 7 patients whose deltoid muscle and axillary nerve could be spared got nearly normal shoulder function but even the patients with loss of deltoid had limited abduction owing to elevation of scapula by shrugging. Elongation of the newly formed shoulder capsule was seen in patients that artificial mesh augmentation was not used. Prolene mesh was used to create a new substitute instead of resected shoulder joint capsule. These patients did not show any elongation at long-term follow-up. All arthroplasties was hemi-type without glenoid reconstruction. Hemiarthroplasty by a modular tumor resection prosthesis system after wide excision of proximal humerus seems to be an effective method of treatment after shoulder malignancies. The main determinant of the function is the status of deltoid axillary nerve and rotator cuff but the patients deprived of structures had a functional upper limb with a good command of the elbow and the hand

Background: The Inferior Glenohumeral Ligament (IGHL) has a well known mechanical and propioceptive relevance in shoulder stability. The interrelation of the IGHL anatomical disposition and innervation has not actually been described. The studys purpose was to determine the IGHL innervation patterns and relate them to dislocation. Material & methods: Forty-five embalmed and 16 fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were studied. Massons Trichrome staining was used to detail the intra-ligamentous nerve fibre arrangements. Neural behaviour of the articular nerves was studied dynamically at the apprehension position and while anteroinferior dislocation of the shoulder joint was performed. Results: The anatomy of the IGHL was clearly defined. However, in 7 out of 61 cases the anterior band was only a slight thickening of the ligament. It averaged 34 mm (range, 28 to 46 mm) in length. The posterior band was only seen in 40.98 % of the cases. The axillary nerve provided IGHL innervation in 95.08 % of the cases. We found two distinct innervation patterns originating in the axillary nerve. In Type 1 (29.5 % of the cases), one or two collaterals later diverged from the main trunk to enter the ligament. Type 2 (65.57%) showed innervation to the ligament provided by the posterior branch for three to four neural branches. In both cases, these branches enter the ligament near the glenoid rim and at 7 oclock position (right shoulder). The shortest distance to the glenohumeral capsule was noted at 5 oclock position. The radial nerve (Type 3 innervation pattern) provided IGHL innervation in 3.28 % (2 specimens). Microscopic analysis revealed wavy intraligamentous neural branches. The articular branches relaxed and separated from the capsule at external rotation and abduction and stayed intact after dislocation. Conclusions: The current results showed the IGHL to have three different innervation patterns. The special neural anatomy of the IGHL suggested it was designed to avoiding denervation when dislocated. This might contribute to understand why the neural arch remains unaffected after most dislocations. To our knowledge this is the first work that clearly describes specimens in which the main innervation of the IGHL is provided by the radial nerve. Knowledge of the neural anatomy of the shoulder will clearly help in avoiding its injury in surgical procedures

Treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) is controversial in many respects, including the choice of surgical approach for fixation when using a locking plate. The classic deltopectoral (DP) approach is believed to increase the risk of avascular necrosis while making access to the greater tuberosity more difficult. The deltoid split (DS) approach was developed to respect minimally invasive surgery principles. The purpose of the present study (NCT-00612391) was to compare outcomes of PHF treated by DP and DS approaches in terms of function (Q-DASH, Constant score), quality of life (SF12), and complications in a prospective randomized multicenter study. From 2007 to 2016, all patients meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria in two University Trauma Centers were invited to participate in the study. Inclusion criteria were: PHF Neer II/III, isolated injury, skeletal maturity, speaking French or English, available for follow-up (FU), and ability to fill questionnaires. Exclusion criteria: Pre-existing pathology to the limb, patient-refusing or too ill to undergo surgery, patient needing another type of treatment (nail, arthroplasty), axillary nerve impairment, open fracture. After consent, patients were randomized to one of the two treatments using the dark envelope method. Pre-injury status was documented by questionnaires (SF12, Q-DASH, Constant score). Range of motion was assessed. Patients were followed at two weeks, six weeks, 3-6-12-18-24 months. Power calculation was done with primary outcome: Q-DASH. A total of 92 patients were randomised in the study and 83 patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. The mean age was 62 y.o. (+- 14 y.) and 77% were females. There was an equivalent number of Neer II and III, 53% and 47% respectively. Mean FU was of 26 months. Forty-four patients were randomized to the DS and 39 to the DP approach. Groups were equivalent in terms of age, gender, BMI, severity of fracture and pre-injury scores. All clinical outcome measures were in favor of the deltopectoral approach. Primary outcome measure, Q-DASH, was better statistically and clinically in the DP group (12 vs 26, p=0,003). Patients with DP had less pain and better quality of life scores than with DS (VAS 1/10 vs 2/10 p=0,019 and SF12M 56 vs 51, p=0,049, respectively). Constant-Murley score was higher in the DP group (73 vs 60, p=0,014). However, active external rotation was better with the DS approach (45° vs 35°). There were more complications in DS patients, with four screw cut-outs vs zero, four avascular necrosis vs one, and five reoperations vs two. Calcar screws were used for a majority of DP fixations (57%) vs a minority of DS (27%) (p=0,012). The primary hypothesis on the superiority of the deltoid split incision was rebutted. Functional outcome, quality of life, pain, and risk of complication favoured the classic deltopectoral approach. Active external rotation was the only outcome better with DS. We believe that the difficulty of adding calcar screws and intramuscular dissection in the DS approach were partly responsible for this difference. The DP approach should be used during Neer II and III PHF fixation

Latissimus dorsi anterior to major transfers have been advocated in the setting of loss of external rotation and elevation in conjunction with reverse shoulder replacement. Reverse shoulder replacement is a prosthesis specifically designed for shoulders with poor rotator cuff function. In the vast majority of cases, some teres minor function at the minimum is maintained in shoulders destined for a reverse shoulder replacement. However, in certain circumstances there is complete loss of any external rotation, and a muscle transfer can be performed in order to restore some external rotation function. A reverse shoulder replacement in the absence of any rotator cuff function goes into obligate internal rotation with elevation. A minimum of external rotation strength is necessary in order to maintain the arm in normal rotation. The first tip is patient selection. Physical examination of active external rotation, external rotation strength and forward elevation should be just performed. A latissimus transfer is indicated in patients who cannot maintain their arm in neutral to at least a few degrees of external rotation. A lag sign is another physical examination finding which can indicate complete loss of rotator cuff function. The latissimus dorsi transfer is performed by first identifying and releasing the latissimus from its insertion on the anterior humerus. The arthroplasty is performed. The passage for the latissimus muscle is developed carefully and being mindful of the axillary nerve in particular. The latissimus is directed inferior to the nerve and around the medial and posterior aspect of the proximal humerus. Different ways of securing the transfer to the humerus have been described including bone tunnels and anchors. Often it is easier to place the anchors and/or the bone tunnels prior to inserting the humeral prosthesis. The latissimus is secured in the new position, enabling it to participate in external rotation. The value of this is difficult to clearly establish. Most studies are evidence level IV and there are no good comparative studies in a controlled patient population. This is a good option for shoulders with no active external rotation, but they may increase overall complication rate. Complications include dislocation, infection, and transient nerve palsy

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is becoming a frequent treatment of choice for patients with shoulder disorders. Complication rates after reverse shoulder arthroplasty may be three-fold that of conventional total shoulder arthroplasty especially in high risk patient populations and diagnoses like revision arthroplasty, fracture sequelae, and severe glenoid bone loss. Complications include component malposition, stiffness, neurological injury, infection, dislocation or instability, acromial or scapular spine fractures, scapular notching, and loosening of implants. Recognition of preoperative risk factors and appropriate 3D planning are essential in optimizing patient outcome and intraoperative success. Failure of reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a significant challenge requiring appropriate diagnosis of the failure mode. The most common neurological injuries involve the brachial plexus and the axillary nerve due to traction, manipulation of the arm, aberrant retractor placement, or relative lengthening of the arm. Intraoperative fractures are relatively uncommon but include the greater tuberosity, acromion, and glenoid. Tuberosity fracture can be repaired intraoperatively with suture techniques, glenoid fractures may be insignificant rim fractures or jeopardise baseplate fixation and require abandoning RSA until glenoid fracture ORIF heals and then a second stage RSA. Periprosthetic infection after RSA ranges from 1 to 10% and may be higher in revision cases and frequently is Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Dislocation was one of the most common complications after RSA approximately 5% but with increased surgeon experience and prosthetic design, dislocation rates are approaching 1–2%. An anterosuperior deltoid splitting approach has been associated with increased stability as well as subscapularis repair after RSA. Scapular notching is the most common complication after RSA. Notching may be caused by direct mechanical impingement of the humerosocket polyethylene on the scapular neck and from osteolysis from polyethylene wear. Sirveaux classified scapular notching based on the defect size as it erodes behind the baseplate towards the central post. Acromial fractures are infrequent but more common is severely eroded acromions from CTA, with osteoporosis, with excessive lengthening, and with superior baseplate screws that penetrate the scapular spine and create a stress riser. Nonoperative care is the mainstay of acromial and scapular spine fractures. Recognizing preoperative risk factors and understanding component positioning and design is essential to maximizing successful outcomes

Shoulder arthritis in the young adult is a deceptive title. The literature is filled with articles that separate outcomes based on an arbitrary age threshold and attempt to provide recommendations for management and even potential criteria for implanting one strategy over another using age as the primary determinant. However, under the age of 50, as few as one out of five patients will have arthritis that can be accurately classified as osteoarthritis. Other conditions such as post-traumatic arthritis, post-surgical arthritis including capsulorrhaphy arthropathy, and rheumatoid arthritis create a mosaic of pathologic bone and soft tissue changes in our younger patients that distort the conclusions regarding “shoulder arthritis” in the young adult. In addition, we are now seeing more patients with unique conditions that are still poorly understood, including arthritis of the pharmacologically performance-enhanced shoulder. Early arthritis in the young adult is often recognised at the time of arthroscopic surgery performed for other preoperative indications. Palliative treatment is the first option, which equals “debridement.” If the procedure fails to resolve the symptoms, and the symptoms can be localised to an intra-articular source, then additional treatment options may include a variety of cartilage restoration procedures that have been developed primarily for the knee and then subsequently used in the shoulder, including microfracture, and osteochondral grafting. The results of these treatments have been rarely reported with only case series and expert opinion to support their use. When arthritis is moderate or severe in young adults, non-arthroplasty interventions have included arthroscopic capsular release, debridement, acromioplasty, distal clavicle resection, microfracture, osteophyte debridement, axillary nerve neurolysis, and bicep tenotomy or tenodesis, or some combination of these techniques. Again, the literature is very limited, with most case series less than 5 years of follow-up. The results are typically acceptable for pain relief, some functional improvement, but not restoration to completely normal function from the patient's perspective. Attempts to resurface the arthritic joint have resulted in limited benefits over a short period of time in most studies. While a few remarkable procedures have provided reasonable outcomes, they are typically in the hands of the developer of the procedure and subsequently, other surgeons fail to achieve the same results. This has been the case with fascia lata grafting of the glenoid, dermal allografts, meniscal allografts, and even biologic resurfacing with large osteochondral grafts for osteoarthritis. Most surgical interventions that show high value in terms of improvement in quality of life require 10-year follow-up. It is unlikely that any of these arthroscopic procedures or resurfacing procedures will provide outcomes that would be valuable in terms of population healthcare; they are currently used on an individual basis to try to delay progression to arthroplasty, with surgeon bias based on personal experience, training, or expert opinion. Arthroplasty in the young adult remains controversial. Without question, study after study supports total shoulder arthroplasty over hemiarthroplasty once the decision has been made that joint replacement is the only remaining option

Optimal surgical management of proximal humeral fractures remains controversial. We report our experience and the study on our surgical technique for proximal humeral fractures and fracture-dislocations using locking plates in conjunction with calcium sulphate augmentation and tuberosity repair using high strength sutures. We used the extended deltoid-splitting approach for fracture patterns involving displacement of both lesser and greater tuberosities and for fracture-dislocations. We retrospectively analysed 22 proximal humeral fractures in 21 patients. 10 were male and 11 female with an average age of 64.6 years (Range 37 to 77). Average follow-up was 24 months. Fractures were classified according to Neer and Hertel systems. Pre-operative radiographs and CT scans in three and four-part fractures were done to assess the displacement and medial calcar length for predicting the humeral head vascularity. According to the Neer classification, there were 5 two-part, 6 three-part, 5 four-part fractures and 6 fracture-dislocations (2 anterior and 4 posterior). Results were assessed clinically with DASH scores, modified Constant & Murley scores and serial post-operative radiographs. The mean DASH score was 16.18 and modified Constant & Murley score was 64.04 at the last follow-up. 18 out of 22 cases achieved good clinical outcome. All the fractures united with no evidence of infection, failure of fixation, malunion, tuberosity failure, avascular necrosis or adverse reaction to calcium sulphate bone substitute. There was no evidence of axillary nerve injury. The CaSO4 bone substitute was replaced by normal appearing trabecular bone texture at an average of 6 months in all patients

Non-operative management has frequently been adopted for closed injuries of the infraclavicular brachial plexus and its branches in the belief that spontaneous recovery is likely to occur, and surgical exploration is performed only if recovery has not occurred in the expected time. This paper correlates the clinical and electrophysiological features with the operative findings in six patients with such injuries. The axillary nerve was ruptured in all six patients, the musculocutaneous nerve in two and the radial nerve in two. When the muscles supplied by a branch of the plexus were denervated, the differentiation between rupture of that branch and a lesion in continuity could only be made by surgical exploration, which should be performed as soon as other injuries permit

Aims

The scapula is a rare site for a primary bone tumour. Only a small number of series have studied patient outcomes after treatment. Previous studies have shown a high rate of recurrence, with functional outcomes determined by the preservation of the glenohumeral joint and deltoid. The purpose of the current study was to report the outcome of patients who had undergone tumour resection that included the scapula.

Opinion varies as to the incidence of nerve lesions in anterior dislocation of the shoulder after low-velocity trauma. Most studies are retrospective or do not use EMG. We have investigated the incidence and the clinical consequences of nerve lesions in a prospective study by clinical and electrophysiological examination. Axonal loss was seen in 48% of 77 patients. The axillary nerve was most frequently involved (42%). Although recovery as judged by EMG and muscle strength was almost complete, function of the shoulder was significantly impaired in patients with lesions of the axillary and suprascapular nerves. Unfavourable prognostic factors are increasing age and the presence of a haematoma. It is not necessary to carry out EMG routinely; an adequate programme of physiotherapy is important. In patients with a severe paresis, EMG is essential after three weeks

We describe 11 cases of posterior fracture-dislocation of the shoulder that required open reduction and fixation. Difficulties with access through anterior approaches led us to use the superior subacromial approach. This is an extension of the approach often used to expose the rotator cuff; the joint is opened by splitting the supraspinatus tendon 5 mm behind the cuff interval. The glenoid, proximal humerus and any fracture fragments can be seen from above, allowing reduction of the dislocation and osteosynthesis to be performed with minimal risk of damage to the humeral head and its blood supply. The proximity of the axillary nerve limits the exposure of the proximal humeral shaft. The superior subacromial approach is ideal for posterior dislocation with fracture of the articular segment, but is not suitable when there is a fracture of the proximal humeral shaft

We reviewed 28 patients with brachial plexus lesions caused by shoulder dislocation. Contrary to most other reports, we found that the neurological lesions involved the infraclavicular and the supraclavicular brachial plexus. With supraclavicular lesions the involvement was always of the suprascapular nerve, and this always recovered spontaneously. Isolated axillary nerve lesions had the poorest prognosis for spontaneous recovery. We explored all lesions that showed no recovery after three to five months and performed either grafting or neurolysis. We discuss the combinations of nerve lesions, their recovery, the surgical indications, and the operations. We also suggest a new classification for these injuries which is more clinically relevant than the anatomical classification of Leffert and Seddon (1965)

Displaced proximal Humeral fractures at Inverclyde Royal Hospital prior to 2008 were previously treated with the antegrade Acumed Polaris Proximal Humeral, predominantly in 2 part fractures. The Philos plate was introduced in 2008, initially being used to treat select non unions, and then expanded to acute fractures. The aim of this study was to assess time to union and complications in the lower volume District General setting comparing to published outcomes. From February 2008 – January 2011, 20 patients were identified. Age range 49–75 (mean 61.2) years, 8 male; 12 female. Left 9, Right 11 Neers 2 part 35%; 3 35%; 4 30%. 16 (80%) were performed in acute fractures with 4 for non-unions, 3 of which were previous polaris nail fixations. 2 patients were lost to follow up after 6/52 but were progressing well. Union was confirmed radiologically and clinically in all but 2 remaining patients (10%), one of whom suffered a significant complication of plate fracture, the second treated with revision for painful non union. 2 other significant complications were observed: transient axillary nerve palsy and deep infection. Both of these patients recovered with delayed union observed in the infection case (52 weeks). Time to union range was 8–52 weeks (mean 17.1). The literature shows a high failure rate of up to 45% with intramedullary nail fixation and limited predominantly to 2 part fractures with risk of damage to the rotator cuff. This study shows a satisfactory union rate using the Philos of 90% with only 3 (15%) requiring further surgery for non-union, plate fracture and infection. 3 and 4 part fractures composed 65% of case load. Early results indicate satisfactory outcomes compared to current published literature

Traumatic rupture of the tendon of the subscapularis muscle was documented as an isolated lesion in the shoulders of 16 men. The injury was caused either by forceful hyperextension or external rotation of the adducted arm. The patients complained of anterior shoulder pain and weakness of the arm when it was used above and below the shoulder level. They did not experience shoulder instability. The injured shoulders exhibited increased external rotation and decreased strength of internal rotation. A simple clinical manoeuvre called the 'lift-off test', reliably diagnosed or excluded clinically relevant rupture of the subscapularis tendon. Confirmation of the clinical diagnosis was best achieved by ultrasonography or MRI, but arthrography or CT arthrography were also useful. Surgical exploration confirmed the diagnosis in every case. Repair of the ruptured tendon was technically demanding and required good exposure to identify and protect the axillary nerve

In 45 patients we assessed the functional results and complications for three different reconstructive procedures after resection of primary tumors of the proximal humerus. An osteoarticular allograft was used in 11, a clavicula pro humero operation in 15 and a tumour prosthesis in 19. The glenoid was resected with the proximal humerus in 25 patients. The axillary nerve was resected in 42 patients. The complication rate was lowest after reconstruction with a tumour prosthesis. The clavicula pro humero operation resulted in the most revisions. Cumulative survival rates for all the reconstructive procedures were similar. At follow-up at two years the functional results for the three reconstructive procedures were the same with a mean functional rating of 79% (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society). Excision of the glenoid had no influence on the functional result. Our findings indicate that the use of a tumour prosthesis is the most reliable limb-salvage procedure for the proximal humerus. The clavicula pro humero is an appropriate procedure if a prosthesis cannot be used

Our purpose was to study the functional outcome and electrophysiologically to assess the axially nerve function in patients who have undergone surgery using a deltoid-splitting approach to treat complex proximal humeral fractures. This was a prospective observational study and was carried out in the Shoulder injury clinic at a university teaching hospital. Over a one-year period we treated fourteen locally-resident patients (median age 59 years) who presented with a three- or four-part proximal humeral fracture. All patients were treated using the extended deltoid-splitting approach, with open reduction, bone grafting and plate osteosynthesis. All patients were prospectively reviewed and underwent functional testing using the DASH, Constant and SF-36 scores as well as spring balance testing of deltoid power, and dynamic muscle function testing. At one year after surgery, all patients underwent EMG and nerve latency studies to assess axillary nerve function. Thirteen of the fourteen patients united their fractures without complications, and had DASH and Constant score that were good, with comparatively minor residual deficits on assessment of muscle power. Of these thirteen patients, only one had evidence of slight neurogenic change in the anterior deltoid. This patient had no evidence of anterior deltoid paralysis and her functional scores, spring balance and dynamic muscle function test results were indistinguishable from the patients with normal electrophysiological findings. One of the fourteen patients developed osteonecrosis of the humeral head nine months after surgery and had poor functional scores, without evidence of nerve injury on electrophysiological testing. Reconstruction through an extended deltoid-splitting approach provides a useful alternative in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures. The approach provides good access for reduction and implant placement and does not appear to be associated with clinically-significant adverse effects

We conducted a prospective evaluation of patients with anterior dislocation of the shoulder associated with a fracture of the greater tuberosity. Thirty-four anterior dislocations of the shoulder with greater tuberosity fractures were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of one year from the time of injury. Eight required open reduction. The final outcome with regard to pain, range of movements, and function was assessed in 34 patients. In open reduction, there were five good results, one fair, one poor and one patient died. In the non-operative group, results were good in 11 patients, fair in eight, poor in one, not assessed in five and one patient died. Two patients have died in this series, one in the open reduction group. Associated injuries are: axillary nerve damage (three), brachial plexus injury (one), loose fragment under the acromion (one) and stiffness of the shoulder (three). Anterior dislocations of the shoulder with fracture of the greater tuberosity do not always lead to good results. Close observation after reduction is important to check for later displacement of the fractures

Complications in internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures can lead to an unsatisfactory outcome. We retrospectively reviewed 22 patients at a mean follow-up of 13 months (range 3–30). The average age was 58 years (36–86) in 10 male and 12 female patients. The mechanism of injury involved a simple fall in 17, MCA in 3, assault in 1 and metastasis in 1. The operation was performed at a mean of 11 days after the injury (range 1–29). There were 12 3-part, 6 2-part, 2 4-part fractures, 1 fracture dislocation and 1 pathological fracture. Only 13 out of 22 patients (59%) did not develop any complications. We had hardware problems in 5 patients including hardware pull-out, plate prominence, screw penetration, loosening or breakage. 2 wound infections, 1 axillary nerve palsy and 1 peri-operative death. 3 patients (14%) had reoperations to remove the plate, 1 had revision fixation, 1 MUA, 1 open capsular release and 1 I+D of wound. Radiographic union was achieved in 18 patients (82%). We identified a relatively high rate of complications especially in alcoholic or unfit patients. Better patient selection and familiarity with the implant and operative technique are essential for a good outcome. Pain relief and union rate were satisfactory

Although, reverse shoulder arthroplasty has initially been introduced for rotator cuff arthropathy, its application has been expanded on fracture sequelae, chronic dislocations and even comminuted fractures of the humeral head in elderly patients. The purpose of this study is to present our experience and the mid-term clinical results of this type prosthesis. Between 2006 and 2008 16 reverse shoulder arthroplasties have been carried out in our department. Fourteen patients were female and 2 male with an average age of 72.4 years (55–81). Eleven patients had true rotator cuff arthropathy, 3 malunion of 4-part fractures, one chronic anterior shoulder dislocation and finally one patient had bilateral chronic posterior shoulder dislocation. In 2 cases we used the Delta prosthesis and in a further 14 cases the Aquealis Arthroplasty. Routine postoperative follow up was at 3,6,12 and 24 months and included plain radiographic control and clinical evaluation with the Constant Shoulder Score. All patients report significant pain relief and an average improvement of the Constant Score from 40.5 to 72.3. Two patients had anterior dislocation of the prosthesis 4 days postoperatively and we proceeded to the application of a 9 mm metal spacer and bigger polyethylene size. In one patient neuroapraxia of the axillary nerve was observed; this resolved 3 months postoperatively. Continuous clinical improvement was observed in some patients up until 18 months postoperatively. Our clinical results are very satisfactory and reveal that reverse shoulder arhroplasty is a very good option for a broad spectrum of pathologic shoulder conditions