header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 429 - 429
1 Nov 2011
Zingde SM Leszko F Komistek RD Garino JP Hozack WJ Dennis DA Mahfouz MR
Full Access

Previous clinical studies have documented the incidence of squeaking in subjects having a ceramic-onceramic (COC) THA. An in vivo sound sensor was recently developed used to capture sound at the THA interface. In this first study, it was determined that subjects having all bearing surface types demonstrated variable sounds. Therefore, in this follow-up study, the overall objective was to simultaneously capture in vivo sound and motion of the femoral head within the acetabular cup during weight-bearing activities for subjects implanted with one of four different ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) THA.

Twenty subjects, each implanted with one of four types of Ceramic-on-Ceramic THA (9 Smith and Nephew, 8 Stryker, 2 Wright Medical Technologies and 1 Encore) were analyzed under in vivo, weightbearing conditions using video fluoroscopy and a sound sensor while performing gait on a treadmill. Patients were pre-screened and two groups were defined: a group diagnosed as audible squeakers (9 THAs) and a control group of THA patients not experiencing audible sounds (11 THAs). Two tri-axial piezoelectric accelerometers were attached to the pelvis and the femoral bone prominences respectively. The sensors detect frequencies propagating through the hip joint interaction. Also, 3D kinematics of the hip joint was determined, with the help of a previously published 2D-to-3D registration technique. In vivo sound was then correlated to 3D in vivo kinematics to determine if positioning of the femoral head within the acetabular cup is an influencing factor.

For the audible group, two had a Smith and Nephew (S& N) THA, six a Stryker THA and one a Wright Medical (WMT) THA. Both of the S& N subjects, 5/6 Stryker and the Wright Medical subjects experienced femoral head separation. The maximum separation for those subjects was 4.6, 5.0 and 2.1 mm for the S& N, Stryker and WMT subjects, respectively. The average separation was 4.3, 2.0 and 2.1 mm for the S& N, Stryker and WMT subjects, respectively. For the eleven subjects in the control group, seven subjects had a S& N THA, two a Stryker and one each having a WMT and Encore THA. All 11 of these subjects demonstrated hip separation with the maximum values being 3.8, 3.4, 1.9 and 2.4 mm for the S& N, Stryker, WMT and Encore THA, respectively. The average separation values were 1.8, 2.3, 1.9 and 2.4 mm for the S& N, Stryker, WMT and Encore THA subjects, respectively.

Four distinct sounds were produced by subjects in this study, which were squeaking, knocking, clicking and grating. Only 3/20 subjects produced a “squeaking” sound that was detected using our sound sensor. One of these subjects had a Stryker THA and two had a WMT THA. Further analysis of the nine subjects who were categorized as audible squeakers revealed that only 0/2, 1/6 and 1/1 subjects having a S& N, Stryker and WMT THA, respectively, demonstrated a squeaking sound that was detected using our sound sensor. Both (2/2) S& N subjects demonstrated a knocking and clicking sound, but neither produced a grating sound, while 5/6 Stryker subjects produced a knocking sound, but only 1/6 demonstrated a clicking or grating sound. Besides the squeaking sound, the only other sound produced by the WMT audible squeaker was a knocking sound. Only 1/11 control group subjects demonstrated a squeaking sound, which was a subject having a WMT THA. With respect to the control group subjects having a S& N THA, 5/7, 1/7 and 3/7 subjects produced a knocking, clicking or grating sound, respectively. Only 1/2 subjects having a Stryker THA produced a knocking or grating sound.

This is the first study to compare multiple COC THAs in analyzing correlation of femoral head separation (sliding) and sound. It was seen that all the THA groups had occurrences of separation and each case of separation correlated with the sound data. These results lead the authors to believe that the influence of squeaking is multi-factorial, and not necessarily attributed only to the bearing surface material.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 460 - 460
1 Nov 2011
Zingde SM Leszko F Komistek RD Mahfouz MR Wasielewski RC Argenson JA
Full Access

Previously, Komistek et al have demonstrated anomalous behaviours in total joints such as separation (sliding) in THAs and condylar lift-off in TKAs. These cases result in reduced contact area, increased contact pressure, polyethylene wear and could induce prosthetic loosening and joint instability.

However, here is no known research done on correlating kinematic conditions with acoustic data for the tibio-femoral joint interface. This study deals with the development of a new method to diagnose such conditions using sound and frequency data. The objective of this study was to determine and compare the in vivo, 3D kinematics and sound for younger subjects with a normal knee, to those of older subjects, with an unimplanted and implanted knee joint.

Ten older subjects having a Hi-Flex PS MB TKA and a contralateral non implanted knee and five younger subjects (with a normal knee) were analysed under in vivo, weight-bearing conditions using video fluoroscopy and a sound sensor while performing four different activities.

deep knee bend to maximum flexion

gait

stair climb and

chair rise and sit.

Three piezoelectric triaxial accelerometers were attached to the femoral epicondyle, tibial tuberocity and the patella respectively. The sensor detects frequencies that are propagated through the tibio-femoral interaction. The signal from the accelerometers was then transferred to a signal conditioner for signal amplification. A data acquisition system was then connected to receive the amplified signal from the signal conditioner and transfer it to a laptop for storage. A sampling rate of 10500Hz was used and frequencies upto 5000Hz were recorded. The signal was then converted to audible sound. Also, 3D tibio-femoral kinematics of the knee was determined, for the four activities with the help of a previously published 2D-to-3D registration technique. The fluoroscopy video and the sensor measurements were synchronized, analysed and compared from full extension to maximum knee flexion for DKB, one full cycle of gait, one complete step on stair climb and from sit-to-stand positions in chair rise.

On average the subjects achieved more flexion with their TKA than with their contralateral knee and consequently experienced significantly higher ROM for their implanted knee. However, both of these groups achieved lower ROM than the normal knees. Significant differences were seen in the AP position of the tibiofemoral contact point. The contact point of the medial condyle for the TKA knee was significantly more posterior at 0° and 30° and remained more posterior than the same condyle of the contralateral throughout flexion. Posterior femoral rollback was seen in all groups, with the normal knee achieving significantly higher posterior femoral rollback when compared to the contralateral and TKA knees. Audible signals were observed for all three groups of knees. The frequency analysis revealed that specific frequencies for all groups were within the same range, but the most dominant frequency for each varied. This may be related to the variable interaction surfaces leading to different dominant frequencies which were excited at magnitudes related to the type and condition of material being impacted (polyethylene/meniscus).

This was the first study to correlate in vivo kinematics to in vivo sounds in the knee. The sounds that were detected correlated well to in vivo motions, especially abnormal kinematic patterns. The ultimate aim of this study is to create a stand alone tool (based only on sound data) that could be used as a diagnostic tool to determine total joint conditions and reduce the dependence on radiation techniques.