Nearly one quarter of ankle fractures have a recognized syndesmosis injury. An intact syndesmosis ligament complex stabilizes the distal tibio-fibular joint while allowing small, physiologic amounts of relative motion. When injured, malreduction of the syndesmosis has been found to be the most important independent factor that contributes to inferior functional outcomes. Despite this, significant variability in surgical treatment remains. This may be due to a poor understanding of normal dynamic syndesmosis motion and the resultant impact of static and dynamic fixation on post-injury syndesmosis kinematics. As the syndesmosis is a dynamic structure, conventional CT static images do not provide a complete picture of syndesmosis position, giving potentially misleading results. Dynamic CT technology has the ability to image joints in real time, as they are moved through a range-of-motion (ROM). The aim of this study was to determine if syndesmosis position changes significantly throughout ankle range of motion, thus warranting further investigation with dynamic CT.

This is an a priori planned subgroup analysis of a larger multicentre randomized clinical trial, in which patients with AO-OTA 44-C injuries were randomized to either Tightrope or screw fixation. Bilateral ankle CT scans were performed at 1 year post-injury, while patients moved from maximal dorsiflexion (DF) to maximal plantar flexion (PF). In the uninjured ankles, three measurements were taken at one cm proximal to the ankle joint line in maximal DF and maximal PF: Anterior (ASD), middle (MSD), and posterior (PSD) syndesmosis distance, in order to determine normal syndesmosis position. Paired samples t-tests compared measurements taken at maximal DF and maximal PF.

Twelve patients (eight male, six female) were included, with a mean age of 44 years (±13years). The mean maximal DF achieved was 1-degree (± 7-degrees), whereas the mean maximal PF was 47-degrees (± 8-degrees). The ASD in DF was 3.0mm (± 1.1mm) versus 1.9mm (± 0.8mm) in PF (p<0.01). The MSD in DF was 3.3mm (±1.1mm) versus 2.3mm (±0.9mm) in PF (p<0.01). The PSD in DF was 5.3mm (±1.5mm) versus 4.6mm (±1.9mm) in PF (p<0.01). These values are consistent with the range of normal parameters previously reported in the literature, however this is the first study to report the ankle position at which these measurements are acquired and that there is a significant change in syndesmosis measurements based on ankle position.

Normal syndesmosis position changes in uninjured ankles significantly throughout range of motion. This motion may contribute to the variation in normal anatomy previously reported and controversies surrounding quantifying anatomic reduction after injury, as the ankle position is not routinely standardized, but rather static measurements are taken at patient-selected ankle positions. Dynamic CT is a promising modality to quantify normal ankle kinematics, in order to better understand normal syndesmosis motion. This information will help optimize assessment of reduction methods and potentially improve patient outcomes. Future directions include side-to-side comparison using dynamic CT analysis in healthy volunteers.

The syndesmosis ligament complex stabilizes the distal tibiofibular joint, while allowing for the subtle fibular motion that is essential for ankle congruity. Flexible fixation with anatomic syndesmosis reduction results in substantial improvements in functional outcomes. New dynamic CT technology allows real-time imaging, as the ankle moves through a range of motion. The aim of this study was to determine if dynamic CT analysis is a feasible method for evaluating syndesmosis reduction and motion following static and flexible syndesmosis fixation.

This is a subgroup analysis of a larger multicenter randomized clinical trial, in which patients with AO 44-C injuries were randomized to either Tightrope (one knotless Tightrope, Group T) or screw fixation (two 3.5-mm cortical screws, Group S). Surgical techniques and rehabilitation were standardized. Bilateral ankle CT scans were performed at one year post-injury, while patients moved from maximal dorsiflexion (DF) to maximal plantar flexion (PF). Three measurements were taken at one cm proximal to the ankle joint line in maximal DF and maximal PF: anterior, midpoint, and posterior tibiofibular distances. T-tests compared Group T and Group S, and injured and uninjured ankles in each group.

Fifteen patients (six Group T [three male], nine Group S [eight male]) were included. There was no difference for mean age (T = 42.8 ± 14.1 years, S = 37 ± 12.6, P = 0.4) or time between injury and CT scan (T = 13 ± 1.8 months, S = 13.2 ± 1.8, P = 0.8). Of note in Group S, seven of nine patients had at least one broken screw and one additional patient had screws removed by the time of their dynamic CT. There was no significant difference between treatment groups for tibiofibular distance measurements in maximal PF or DF. Group T showed no significant difference between the injured and uninjured side for tibiofibular measurements in maximal PF and DF, suggesting anatomic reduction. For Group S, however, there was a significantly larger distance for all three measurements at maximal PF compared to the uninjured ankle (all P < 0 .05).

In all but one Group S patient, screws were broken or removed prior to their dynamic CT, allowing possible increased syndesmotic motion, similar to Group T. Despite this, dynamic CT analysis detected increased tibiofibular distance in Group S as ankles moved into maximal PF when compared with the uninjured ankle. Given the importance of anatomic syndesmosis reduction, dynamic ankle CT technology may provide valuable physiologic information warranting further investigation.