header advert
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 7 - 7
1 Feb 2020
Hettich G Schierjott R Graichen H Jansson V Rudert M Traina F Weber P Grupp T
Full Access

Introduction

Revision total hip arthroplasty is often associated with acetabular bone defects. In most cases, assessment of such defects is still qualitative and biased by subjective interpretations. Three-dimensional imaging techniques and novel anatomical reconstructions using statistical shape models (SSM) allow a more impartial and quantitative assessment of acetabular bone defects [1]. The objectives of this study are to define five clinically relevant parameters and to assess 50 acetabular bone defects in a quantitative way.

Methods

Anonymized CT-data of 50 hemi-pelvises with acetabular bone defects were included in the study. The assessment was based on solid models of the defect pelvis (i.e. pelvis with bone defect) and its anatomical reconstruction (i.e. native pelvis without bone defect) (Fig.1A).

Five clinically relevant parameters were defined: (1) Bone loss, defined by subtracting defect pelvis from native pelvis. (2) Bone formation, defined by subtracting native pelvis from defect pelvis. Bone formation represents bone structures, which were not present in the native pelvis (e.g. caused by remodeling processes around a migrated implant). (3) Ovality, defined by the length to width ratio of an ellipse fitted in the defect acetabulum. A ratio of 1.0 would represent a circular acetabulum. (4) Lateral center-edge angle (LCE angle), defined by the angle between the most lateral edge of the cranial roof and the body Z-axis, and (5) implant migration, defined by the distance between center of rotation (CoR) of the existing implant and CoR of native pelvis (Fig. 1B).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 46 - 46
1 Apr 2018
Woiczinski M Ingr K Steinbrück A Weber P Schröder C Müller PE Jansson V
Full Access

Wear is an important factor in the long term success of total knee arthroplasty. Therefore, wear testing methods and machines become a standard in research and implant development. These methods are based on two simulation concepts which are defined in standards ISO 14243-1 and 14243-3. The difference in both concepts is the control mode. One is force controlled while the other has a displacement controlled concept.

The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical stresses within the different ISO concepts. Furthermore the force controlled ISO was updated in the year 2009 and should be compared with the older which was developed in 2001.

A finite element model based on the different ISO standards was developed. A validation calculated with kinematic profile data of the same implant (Aesculap, Columbus CR) in an experimental wear test setup (Endolap GmbH) was done. Based on this model all three different ISO standards were calculated and analysed.

Validation results showed Pearson correlation for anterior posterior movement of 0.3 and for internal external rotation 0.9. Two main pressure maximums were present in ISO 14243-1:2001 (force controlled) with 17.9 MPa and 13.5 MPa for 13 % and 48 % of the gait cycle. In contrast ISO 14243-1:2009 (force controlled) showed three pressure maximums of 18.5 MPa (13 % of gait cycle), 16.4 MPa (48 % of gait cycle) and 13.2 MPa (75 % of gait cycle). The displacement controlled ISO (14243-3:2014) showed two pressure maximums of 16.0 MPa (13 % of gait cycle) and 17.2 MPa (48 % of gait cycle).

The adapted force controlled ISO of the year 2009 showed higher mechanical stress during gait cycle which also might lead to higher wear rates. The displacement controlled ISO leads to higher mechanical stress because of the constraint at the end of the stance phase of the gait cycle. Future studies should analyse different inlay designs within these ISO standards.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 256 - 256
1 Sep 2012
Weber P Schröder C Utzschneider S Jansson V Müller P
Full Access

Introduction

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with isolated medial osteoarthritis of the knee is nowadays a standard procedure with good results, especially with the minimally-invasive approach. However, the survival rate of the unicompartmental knee prostheses is inferior to that of total knee prostheses. Therefore, further studying of UKA is still necessary. In most mobile bearing designs the femoral component has a spherical surface and therefore its positioning is not crucial. The role of the tibial slope in UKA has not been investigated so far. The manufacturers recommend tibial slopes with values between 10° positive slope and 5° negative slope. Most surgeons try to reconstruct the anatomical slope with a high failure by measuring the slope on x-rays. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the tibial slope on the wear rate of a medial UKA.

Materials and methods

In vitro wear simulation of medial mobile bearing unicompartmental knee prosthesis with a spherical femoral surface (Univation ®) was performed with a customized four-station servo-hydraulic knee wear simulator (EndoLab GmbH, Thansau, Germany) reproducing exactly the walking cycle as specified in ISO 14243–1:2002(E). The tibial tray was inserted with 2 different medial tibial slopes: 0°, 8° (n=3 for each group). The lateral tibial slope of the space-holder was not changed (0° for every group). We performed a total of 5 million cycles for every different slope, the gravimetric wear rate was determined gravimetrically using an analytical balance every 500 000 cycles according to the ISO 14243–2.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 412 - 413
1 Jul 2010
Price A Longino D Svard U Kim K Weber P Fiddian N Shakespeare D Keys G Beard D Pandit H Dodd C Murray D
Full Access

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report the mid-term survival results of Oxford UKAs in patients of 50 years of age or less, using (1) revision surgery and (2) Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) as outcome measures.

Method: A literature review identified studies of Oxford mobile bearing UKAs containing individuals 1) 50 years old or less with 2) medial osteoarthritis and 3) 2 years or longer follow-up. Authors were approached to participate in a multi-centre survival analysis by submitting all their patients, 50 years of age or less, who received a medial UKA for osteoarthritis. Patients who had died, been lost to follow-up or who underwent revision were identified. OKS were established for all patients with surviving implants.

Results: Seven centres submitted 107 patients. The mean age was 47 years (range 32–50). The average follow-up was 4 years (range 1–25). Forty-seven patients had follow-up into their fifth year or longer. The cumulative 7-year survival using revision as the endpoint was 96% (CI 8). The mean post-operative OKS for surviving implants was 38 (CI 2) out of a possible 48.

Conclusion: While early survival rates and function are encouraging, long-term follow-up is required before concluding UKA is a viable treatment option in young patients with unicompartmental knee arthritis.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 74-B, Issue 3 | Pages 477 - 478
1 May 1992
Weber P


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 68-B, Issue 5 | Pages 824 - 826
1 Nov 1986
Weber P

A case is reported in which an epithelioid sarcoma developed in an apparently benign enchondroma or bone infarct at the site of a chrome-cobalt total knee replacement.