header advert
Results 1 - 9 of 9
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 123 - 123
1 May 2016
Dorman S Choudhry M Dhadwal A Pearson K Waseem M
Full Access

Introduction

The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming increasingly common in the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy. Standard RSA technique involves medialising the centre of rotation (COR) maximising the deltoid lever arm and compensating for rotator cuff deficiency. However reported complications include scapular notching, prosthetic loosening and loss of shoulder contour. As a result the use of Bony Increased Offset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) has been gaining in popularity. The BIO-RSA is reported to avoid these complications by lateralising the COR using a modified base plate, longer central post and augmentation with cancellous bone graft harvested from the patients humeral head.

Objectives

This study aims to compare the outcome in terms of analgesic effect, function and satisfaction, in patients treated with standard RSA and BIO-RSA.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 124 - 124
1 May 2016
Dorman S Dhadwal A Pearson K Waseem M
Full Access

Introduction

The use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is becoming increasingly common in the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy. In recent years indications for use have expanded to include elderly patients in whom either internal fixation is not possible due to fracture configuration, poor bone quality, or presence of a rotator cuff deficiency. There is however relatively little evidence to support its use in these circumstances.

Objective

This study aims to assess the viability of RSA as a salvage procedure in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures or irreducible dislocations, quantified in terms of functional outcome, complication rates and patient reported satisfaction.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 87 - 87
1 Jan 2016
Islam SU Choudhry MN Waseem M
Full Access

Introduction

Snapping scapula symptoms occur due to disruption of the smooth gliding motion between scapula and thoracic cage. Patients present with pain in the scapulothoracic area aggravated by overhead and repetitive shoulder movements. It is often associated with audible and palpable crepitus, clicking, crunching, grating or snapping sensation. Open or arthroscopic scapulothoracic surgical treatment is an option when non-operative treatment modalities fail. The aim of our study was to assess the outcome of scapulothoracic arthroscopic treatment in patients with painful snapping scapula.

Methods

Eight patients underwent scapulothoracic arthroscopic treatment for painful snapping scapula. Pre-operatively, all these patients had a trial of conservative treatment modalities for at least 6 months, consisting of activity modification, analgesia and physiotherapy for restoration of normal scapulothoracic kinematics. All patients had a temporary pain relief following a local anaesthetic and steroid injection.

We graded the crepitus from 0 to 3 - 0 being no crepitus, 1 being palpable but not audible crepitus, 2 being soft audible crepitus and 3 being loud crepitus.

Operations were performed with the patients in either prone or semi-prone position. The arm was placed in the “chicken wing” position (arm in full internal rotation with the hand placed on the back), so that the scapula lifted up from the chest wall. Two portals along the medial border of scapula were used for arthroscopy and instrumentation. In two cases a superior portal was also used.

Outcome was assessed by pre and postoperative visual analogue score (VAS) and Oxford Shoulder Score. Pre and postoperative scores were compared using paired t-test. The significance level was set at P <. 05.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 151 - 151
1 Jan 2016
Zhou R Glover A Pearson K Waseem M
Full Access

4 years of follow-up study on 27 patients who had biological reverse total shoulder replacement 12 patients who had Bio-RSA by using Tonier Aequalis reversed implants with bone graft extracted from the head of humerus before humeral shaft was prepared. The average age of this group of patients is 77. The average pre-operative shoulder abduction on the affected side is 52 degrees and forward flexion of 90 degrees. Indication for surgery in all those cases are due to cuff tear. The average post-operative abduction is 90 degrees and forward flexion of 97 degrees. The average follow-up period is 9 months with a range from 4 to 18 months. Two patients from this group failed to make an improvement in the range of their shoulder movements post-operatively.

15 underwent Bio-RSA by using Delta XTEND reverse shoulder system without bone graft. The average age of this group of patients is 73. The average pre-operative shoulder abduction is 35 degrees and forward flexion of 37 degrees. Indication for surgery again in most of the cases is due to cuff tear, except one case was due to proximal humeral fracture. The average post-operative abduction is 96 degrees and forward flexion of 101 degrees. The average follow-up period is 19 months with a range of 4–42 months. Only one patient failed to make an improvement post-operatively. This is the patient who had Bio-RSA due to a proximal humeral fracture. 6 patients out of this group also had previous resurfacing which has failed in comparison to the bone graft group which none had previous resurfacing surgery.

Conclusion

Overall, the average post-operative range of movements in both groups is not very significant different. Bio-RSA without bone graft seems to make a larger improvement when compared with per-operative range of motion. Howver, whether a much longer follow-up period and younger patients have an impact on the outcome is debatable.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 122 - 122
1 Jan 2016
Waseem M Pearson K
Full Access

We undertook 37 reverse total shoulder replacements within a 2 yr period for chronic complex shoulder conditions. All cases were undertook by one of two upper limb consultant orthopaedic surgeons. At time of listing for operation, the decision as to whether to undertake a bony-increased offset reverse total shoulder was made. Retrospective data was collected on the need for analgesia at final follow up and range of movement.

Of the 37 patients, 12 underwent BIO-RSA procedures. Indications for surgery was predominantly rotator cuff arthropathy (n=9) but two patients had severe OA and one had a complex proximal humeral fracture. The average age of the patient was 76.6 yrs (69–87 yrs) with a mean follow-up of 6.8 months (6 weeks to 1 yr).

The remaining 25 patients were similar in terms of indication, with 18 patients with cuff tear arthropathies and 7 with severe OA. Average age was slightly lower at 74.9 years (50–85).

In terms of range of movement, outcomes between the two groups were broadly similar; those receiving BIO-RSA having an active forward flexion of 90.5° (50–130°) and abduction 88.6° (40–160°). Both groups had excellent analgesic effect with 92% in each either being completely painfree (33.3% BIO-RSA and 44% RSA) or requiring only occasional analgesia. The vast majority of patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome of the surgery, with one patient in the BIO-RSA group being slightly dissatisfied and three in RSA group.

If grafting is necessary, the use of BIO-RSA within this centre seems to have comparable results to those undergoing standard RSA.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 118 - 118
1 Jan 2016
Waseem M Pearson K Zhou R
Full Access

Whilst the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is becoming more common for the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy, there is still relatively little evidence with regards to its use in complex fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. It is increasingly felt to be of use in those patients in whom either internal fixation is not possible due to fracture configuration or bone quality, or in whom there is a rotator cuff deficiency.

We report the outcomes of 14 patients with complex 3- or 4-part humeral fractures or delayed presentation of dislocation treated with reverse TSR. Patients were treated within a two year period from January 2011 to December 2013. The average age at time of operation was 75 (50–91 years) with a mean follow-up of 7 months (2–13 months). One patient moved out of area and one lost to follow-up two months following procedure.

Reverse TSR was considered a salvage procedure for patients with comminuted proximal humeral fractures or those who presented with irreducible non-acute dislocations. At time of last follow-up all 14 patients were satisfied with the results of their operation and functionally independent with activities of daily living. Range of movement post-operatively was good with mean active forward extension 97° (70–150°) and abduction 101° (80–170°). 43% of patients were pain-free, whilst the remainder only required the use of occasional analgesia. No major post-operative complications were reported.

Patients who underwent reverse TSR for dislocation fared better than for those with proximal humeral fractures. The mean active forward extension was 107.5° (90–150°) and abduction 112.5° (90–170°) in the dislocation group (n=5) compared with those who had a fracture in which the forward extension was 91.4° (70–120°) and abduction 95° (80–120°).

The results of these patients demonstrate that reverse TSR should be considered in patients with complex proximal humeral fractures or delayed presentation of fractures. It seems to provide consistently excellent pain-relief for patients, with patients either reporting being pain-free or requiring only occasional analgesia. In addition, all patients treated were functionally independent following operation. Range of movement, particularly for those with dislocation, appear good. Further follow-up is required to ensure sustained results but early studies are encouraging.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 31 - 31
1 Mar 2013
Mehta K Shakeel M George Malal J Waseem M
Full Access

The study was designed to look at canine related injuries presenting to the orthopaedic department at a small rural district general hospital and to assess their cost to the NHS.

A retrospective review of case notes and x-rays of all dog related injuries presenting to the orthopaedic services at our hospital over a one year period starting January 2011 was undertaken. The injuries involved and the treatment provided along with the direct financial cost of these services were calculated from trust tariffs.

Dog related injuries accounted for 84 out of a total of 48,405 patients presenting to the accident and emergency services over the index period. Of these, 29 required orthopaedic input with 57% of injuries resulting from trying to restrain a dog and the rest from being attacked by a dog. 14 patients were admitted to the wards with 11 among them requiring orthopaedic interventions ranging from wound wash outs and debridement to open reduction and internal fixation of fractures. These procedures cost £38,951 to the NHS. There were a total of 38 inpatient days involved costing another £9,196. A further 28 clinic visits were billed at £4,032. The total cost for the orthopaedic services provided was £52,179. There were no mortalities associated with these injuries over the time period.

Canine related injuries are costly and avoidable. General public awareness of the problem coupled with appropriate legislation and its strict enforcement may be necessary to protect people from our canine companions.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 144 - 144
1 Sep 2012
Broomfield J Ralte P Neophytou C Waseem M
Full Access

Since November 2003 there have been 62 Metacarpophalangeal Joint (MCPJ) replacements carried out on 16 patients at Macclesfield District general hospital. 11 of the patients were female and 5 were male. The mean patient age at procedure was 64.9 years, with an age range of 28 to 80. Of the 62 MCPJ replacements carried out, 58 (93.5%) were as a result of rheumatoid arthritis, with only 4 (6.5%) as a result of osteo-arthritis. The primary objective of this study is to assess their outcomes to date. Data was collected retrospectively by means of case note review. Outcomes measured were patient rating of pain and function at post operative review and post operative complications. All operations were carried out by a single surgeon, using his standard operative technique, and all replacements used the Neuflex Finger Joint Implant System. All 16 patients attended for post operative review. At the time of discharge 13 patients rated their outcome as excellent to good, 1 patient was deceased and 2 patients are currently under follow up with no reported complications. Mean time to discharge was 19 months (2–68). Of the total 62 joints replaced, 10 revisions were carried out. Of these, 3 were as a result of dislocation, 6 were for subluxation and 1 as a result of failure of the prosthesis. There were 3 other post operative complications; 1 was for superficial wound infection, 1 resulting from a prominent prosthesis and 1 hypertrophic scar. Results showed that 81.3% of patients rated their range of movement as good to excellent and 87.5% reported an improvement in pain. Overall, 81% of patients rated their outcome at discharge as good to excellent. From the data available we conclude that the Neuflex system is an effective treatment method with a low complication rate.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 184 - 184
1 Sep 2012
Ralte P Grant S Withers D Walton R Morapudi S Bassi R Fischer J Waseem M
Full Access

Purpose

Plating remains the most widely employed method for the fixation of displaced diaphyseal clavicle fractures. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and outcomes of diaphyseal clavicle fractures treated with intramedullary fixation using the Rockwood clavicle pin.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all diaphyseal clavicle fractures treated with intramedullary fixation using the Rockwood pin between February 2004 and March 2010. Sixty-eight procedures were carried out on 67 patients. Functional outcome was assessed using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and an overall patient satisfaction questionnaire.