Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is frequently used as thromboprophylaxis after major orthopaedic surgery. Varying levels of non-adherence (5% to 45%) with outpatient LMWH has been reported. Oral direct thrombin inhibitors have been recommended by industry due to ease of administration. We aim to audit the compliance rate with outpatient LMWH treatment following primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) in our district general hospital (DGH). Using the ORMIS computer system, we identified all primary THA performed in Monklands Hospital between July 2011 and August 2012. Patients’ case notes were analysed retrospectively, looking at operating surgeon's postoperative thromboprophylaxis instructions. We then conducted a telephone interview on patients discharged with outpatient LMWH to assess compliance. There were 58 primary THAs performed during the audit period. 33 patients were discharged on outpatient LMWH, whilst 15 patients and 3 patients were discharged on aspirin and warfarin respectively. Seven patients were excluded as their discharge prescriptions were missing. We successfully contacted 20 of the 33 patients discharged with outpatient LMWH. All respondents showed 100% compliance to the full course of treatment. 50% of patients self-administered; 30% were administered by district nurses and 20% by family members. 35% of patients preferred an oral tablet alternative, for its perceived ease of administration. Bruising and skin irritation were the reported problems in some patients, but these did not affect compliance. Contrary to the previous published non-adherence rates, the compliance rate with outpatient LMWH after THA was high in our DGH. The patient counseling, and family/district nurse involvement in may have contributed to this. However, our numbers of patients are low but data collection continues.
Adequate range of knee motion is critical for successful total knee arthroplasty. While aggressive physical therapy is an important component, manipulation may be a necessary supplement. There seems to be a lack of consensus with variable practices existing in managing stiff postoperative knees following arthroplasty. Hence we did a postal questionnaire survey to determine the current practice and trend among knee surgeons throughout the United Kingdom. A postal questionnaire was sent out to 100 knee surgeons registered with British Association of Knee Surgeons ensuring that the whole of United Kingdom was well represented. The questions among others included whether the surgeon used Manipulation Under Anaesthaesia (MUA) as an option for stiff postoperative knees; timing of MUA; use of Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) post-manipulation. We received 82 responses. 46.3% of the respondents performed MUA routinely, 42.6% sometimes, and 10.9% never. Majority (71.2%) performed MUA within 3 months of the index procedure. 67.5% routinely used CPM post-manipulation while 7.3% of the respondents applied splints or serial cast post MUA. 41.5% of the surgeons routinely used Patient Controlled Analgaesia +/− Regional blocks. Majority (54.8%) never performed open/arthroscopic debridement of fibrous tissue for adhesiolysis. Knee manipulation requires an additional anaesthetic and may result in complications such as: supracondylar femur fractures, wound dehiscence, patellar tendon avulsions, haemarthrosis, and heterotopic ossification. Moreover studies have shown that manipulation while being an important therapeutic adjunct does not increase the ultimate flexion that can be achieved which is determined by more dominant factors such as preoperative flexion and diagnosis. Manipulation should be reserved for the patient who has difficult and painful flexion in the early postoperative period.
