Aims. Lateral epicondylitis is a frequent pathology usually resolved with conservative methods but ocasionally evolve to chronic unresolved tendinosis. Bipolar Radiofrequency has potentially the effect to stimulate a healing response on chronic tendinosis. We present the results of 15 cases with chronic epicondylitis treated with Bipolar Radiofrequency.

Methods. Fifteen patients with chronically lateral epicondylitis and previously failed conservative treatment during 6 months with antiinflamatory drugs, phisiotherapy and at least 3 corticosteroid injections were treated with open Bipolar Radiofrequency. Using local anesthesia, and through a 2 cm incision the tendon was stimulated using the TOPAZ ward (Arthrocare,CA). It was done at 5 mm. distance intervals in a clock-wise fashion in the symptomatic area. The incision was closed with 2 sutures and a compressive bandage was applied. No movement was restricted and rehabilitation began immediately.

Results. After an average follow-up of 18 months (6–24), results were excellent in 14 cases and good in one case. The postoperative VAS scores were decreased by 60% at 7 days postoperative, 80% at three weeks and 95% at 6 months. Return to job was at an average of 3 weeks (15 days–4 weeks). All patients were satisfied with the result.

Conclusions. Bipolar Radiofrequency is an alternative, effective and safe method for treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis when conservative treatments are not effective.

Purpose: Management of septic nonunion of long bones is a difficult challenge requiring a multidisciplinary approach. The purpose of this study was to report our results with a two-stage technique using a spacer (Masquelet technique).

Material and methods: Between June 1997 and July 2001, eleven patients were treated for septic nonunion (n=7) or suspected septic nonunion (n= =4). There were seven men and four women: mean age 38 years (26–51). Nonunion involved the humerus (n=1), the femur (n=1), and the tibia (n=9). The same surgical technique was used in all cases: “carcinologic” debridement with gap filling using antibiotic cement and osteosynthesis when necessary, followed by a second procedure two months later to remove the spacer and insert an autologous bone graft when laboratory results had returned to normal.

Results: Mean follow-up was three years (1–5). All patients achieved per primam bone healing within 4.5 months (3–6) despite a mean bone gap of 55 mm (15–100) after avivement. Intraoperative samples taken during the second procedure were negative and there was no recurrent infection or need for revision.

Discussion: This two-phase technique has provided encouraging results in terms of “infectious cure” and bone healing. A standardised approach to the treatment of septic nonunion of long bones as used in our centre should provide data validating this technique.

Purpose: In 1988, the conclusions of the SOFCOT symposium appear to condemn use of cemented implants for revision of loosened femoral elements. Eleven years later, at the 1999 Symposium, Vidalain demonstrated that cementing remains a reasonable alternative. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to estimate long-term results of revisions using a long cemented stem without bone stock reconstruction.

Material and methods: From 1987 to 1995, 135 patients (135 hips) underwent revision surgery with this technique. We retained for analysis 95 hips (15 lost to follow-up 25 deceased patients) in 66 women and 29 men, mean age 70 years at revision (42–86). The preoperative Postel Merle d’Aubigné (PMA) function score was 8/18. Femoral implants in place had been cemented in 80% of the hips. Using the SOFCOT criteria, 65% of the loosenings were stage II, 29.5% stage III. All were aseptic loosenings and the same revision technique was used in all cases: removal-replacement of both prosthetic elements, use of a long cemented stem without associated grafting.

Results: Mean follow-up was eight years (60–157). Thirty nine percent of the patients had early postoperative complications. The mean function score at last follow-up was 14.8/18 with 62.4% of the outcomes considered good or very good. Age, restitution of the rotation centre, quality of cementing, and stem/femur fit influenced the result significantly. Radiographic analysis showed a progressive lucent line in 32% of the hips, only 36% of the femoral stems were totally free of lucent lines. Cumulative actuarial survival was 87% at 14 years and fell to 65.5% considering certain radiographic loosening as the endpoint.

Conclusion: Use of a long cemented femoral stem for revision total hip arthroplasty provides acceptable long-term functional outcome. Results are significantly affected by imperfect technique. This type of implant, which destroys any hop for restoration of bone stock, should be reserved of elderly subject where a more “ambitious” procedure were be too risky.

Purpose: Infection is a serious complication of total knee arthroplasty. Surgical strategies based on removal-reinsertion of the prosthesis in two times with antibiotic therapy has proven its efficacy. The use of a spacer between the two operations has been proposed to facilitate reimplantation. Since 1993, we have used this two-time procedure with an articulated spacer in an attempt to optimise functional outcome yet maintain anti-infection efficacy. We report our experience.

Material and methods: This retrospective series included 28 patients, 21 women (75%) and seven men (25%) who underwent surgery between December 1993 and February 2000.Mean age of the patients at revision was 67 years (18–83). Medical and surgical risk factors for infection were present in 64% and 54% of the cases respectively. Delay between prosthesis surgery and onset of the first signs of infection was 29 months (four days–222 months). A single-germ infection was involved in 18 cases (64%) and a multiple-germ infection in nine (36%). The infection was acute in 32% of the cases and chronic in 68%. There were eight fistulae (28%). Bacteriology reported staphylococcal infection in 25 cases (including 13 S. epidermidis), streptococcal infections in five, anaerobic germs in seven (corynebacterium in five) and Gram-negative germ (pseudomonas) in one. Delay between diagnosis of infection and insertion of the articulated spacer was 11 months (four days–62 months). The first operation consisted in removal of the prosthesis, wide excision of the synovial and infected tissues and insertion of the two articulated pieces, modelled with antibiotic-impregnated cement. Weight-bearing was authorised with crutches and an articulated brace. Rehabilitation exercises were performed to maintain joint amplitude. The prosthesis was reimplanted three months later (1.5–7 months). All prostheses were reimplanted with cement: two prostheses with posterior preservation, 20 posterior stabilised prostheses, and six hinge prostheses. The patients were given antibiotics for eleven months (1–25 months). The IKS score was used to assess functional outcome. Cure of infection was assessed on clinical, biological and radiographic findings.

Results: All patients were seen at a mean follow-up of 35 months (8–78). Follow-up was greater than 24 months in 68% of the patients. We had three cases (11%) of recurrent infection: one acute infection and two septic loosenings. At reimplantation, we had complications in seven patients (25%) ten of whom required revision surgery, six for mechanical complications (three dislocations, three aseptic loosenings). Mean IKS score was 136 points (50–190) with 79 points (30–100) for the knee and 67 points (20–90) for function. Mean flexion amplitude was 94° (45–115°).

Discussion, conclusion: With this method, joint mobility can be maintained between the two operations, greatly improving patient comfort. The mid-term results in terms of infection cure have been satisfactory (89% cure). Nevertheless, the final functional result can be disappointing, due to the persistence of pain (low-grade infection, difficult implant fixation…). The removal-reinsertion strategy using a single operation would in our opinion still have its indications.