Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 3 | Pages 406 - 413
1 Mar 2014
Tarassoli P Gargan MF Atherton WG Thomas SRYW

The medial approach for the treatment of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in whom closed reduction has failed requires minimal access with negligible blood loss. In the United Kingdom, there is a preference for these children to be treated using an anterolateral approach after the appearance of the ossific nucleus. In this study we compared these two protocols, primarily for the risk of osteonecrosis.

Data were gathered prospectively for protocols involving the medial approach (26 hips in 22 children) and the anterolateral approach (22 hips in 21 children) in children aged <  24 months at the time of surgery. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was assessed with validated scores. The acetabular index (AI) and centre–edge angle (CEA) were also measured.

The mean age of the children at the time of surgery was 11 months (3 to 24) for the medial approach group and 18 months (12 to 24) for the anterolateral group, and the combined mean follow-up was 70 months (26 to 228). Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was evident or asphericity predicted in three of 26 hips (12%) in the medial approach group and four of 22 (18%) in the anterolateral group (p = 0.52). The mean improvement in AI was 8.8° (4° to 12°) and 7.9° (6° to 10°), respectively, at two years post-operatively (p = 0.18). There was no significant difference in CEA values of affected hips between the two groups.

Children treated using an early medial approach did not have a higher risk of developing osteonecrosis at early to mid-term follow-up than those treated using a delayed anterolateral approach. The rates of acetabular remodelling were similar for both protocols.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:406–13.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 7 - 7
1 Feb 2013
Tarassoli P Gargan M Atherton G Thomas S
Full Access

Purpose

To compare the early medial open approach (MO) with the anterior approach (AO) performed after the appearance of the ossific nucleus for DDH that has failed closed reduction or presented late.

Methods

We present the experience of 2 UK surgeons with prospectively gathered data for MO (26 hips) compared with that of a third surgeon in the same unit for the AO (21 hips) in 41 children under 24 months of age at index surgery. Femoral head osteonecrosis (FHO) risk was predicted using the height-to-width index of Bruce et al, measured at 12–18 months post reduction, and graded with the Kalamchi and MacEwen classification where follow-up exceeded 3 years. Acetabular index (AI) was measured at or close to 2 years post reduction.