Following the establishment of regional Major Trauma Networks in England in 2012, there were concerns that pressures regarding resource allocation in Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) may have a detrimental impact on the care of patients with hip fractures in these hospitals. This study aimed to compare outcomes in hip fracture care between MTCs and trauma units (TUs).

National Hip Fracture Database data was extracted from 01/01/2015 to 31/12/2022 for all hospitals in England. Outcome measures included perioperative medical and physiotherapy assessments, time to surgery, consultant supervision in theatre, Best Practice Tariff (BPT) compliance, discharge to original residence, and mortality. Data was pooled and weighted for MTCs and remaining hospitals (TUs).

A total of 487,089 patients with hip fractures were included from 167 hospitals (23 MTCs and 144 TUs). MTCs achieved marginally higher rates of orthogeriatrician assessment within 72 hours of admission (91.1% vs 90.4%, p<0.001) and mobilisation out of bed by first postoperative day (81.9% vs 79.7%, p<0.001). A lower proportion of patients underwent surgery by the day after admission in MTCs (65.2% vs 69.7%, p<0.001). However, there was significantly higher consultant surgeon and anaesthetist supervision rates during surgery in MTCs (71.8% vs 61.6%, p<0.001). There was poorer compliance with BPT criteria in MTCs (57.3% vs 60.4%, p<0.001), and proportionately fewer MTC patients were discharged to their original residence (63.5% vs 60.4%, p<0.001). There was no difference between MTCs and TUs in 30-day mortality (6.8% vs 6.8%, p=0.825).

This study demonstrates that MTCs have greater difficulty in providing prompt surgery to hip fracture patients. However, their marginally superior perioperative care outcomes appear to compensate for this, as their mortality rates are similar to TUs. These findings suggest that the regionalisation of major trauma in England has not significantly compromised the overall care of hip fracture patients.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for joint replacement surgery is widely recommended and has been shown to reduce infection rates. Cephalosporins have commonly been used but are associated with development of Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea (CDAD)

The purpose of this study was to assess whether a change of protocol aimed at reducing CDAD, including a change of antibiotic prophylaxis would reduce rates of CDAD and other postoperative complications.

We studied all 7989 patients in our trust that underwent hip or knee replacement from May 2002 to March 2009. These patients fell into two cohorts, firstly those who were prescribed cefuroxime as prophylaxis and secondly those prescribed gentamicin which was introduced following national concern regarding CDAD.

Following the change of prophylaxis from cefuroxime 750mg three doses to gentamicin 4.5 mg/kg single dose the rate of CDAD reduced significantly (0.17% to 0%, p<0.03), however the rate of acute renal failure (0.29% to 0.6%, p=0.04) and pneumonia (0.71% to 1.38%, p<0.01) increased significantly. The rate of urinary tract infection (1.44% to 1.20%, p >0.05) and the overall return to theatre rate (1.86% to 2.30%, p=0.21) were not significantly changed.

The spectrum of bacteria grown from infected joint replacements in the two cohorts was also analysed. The rate of deep MRSA infection was significantly less in the group given gentamicin. The frequency of other bacteria was also different between the cohorts, but not significantly so.

We conclude that changing protocol including antibiotic prophylaxis in joint replacement patients can have the desired effect on a particular outcome namely CDAD but can also result in increased rates of other postoperative complications. It is also likely to result in a change in the bacterial spectrum of infected joint replacements.