To explore the clinical efficacy of using two different types of articulating spacers in two-stage revision for chronic knee periprosthetic joint infection (kPJI). A retrospective cohort study of 50 chronic kPJI patients treated with two types of articulating spacers between January 2014 and March 2022 was conducted. The clinical outcomes and functional status of the different articulating spacers were compared. Overall, 17 patients were treated with prosthetic spacers (prosthetic group (PG)), and 33 patients were treated with cement spacers (cement group (CG)). The CG had a longer mean follow-up period (46.67 months (SD 26.61)) than the PG (24.82 months (SD 16.46); p = 0.001).Aims
Methods
Minimally invasive total knee replacement (MIS-TKR)
has been reported to have better early recovery than conventional
TKR. Quadriceps-sparing (QS) TKR is the least invasive MIS procedure,
but it is technically demanding with higher reported rates of complications
and outliers. This study was designed to compare the early clinical
and radiological outcomes of TKR performed by an experienced surgeon
using the QS approach with or without navigational assistance (NA),
or using a mini-medial parapatellar (MP) approach. In all, 100 patients
completed a minimum two-year follow-up: 30 in the NA-QS group, 35
in the QS group, and 35 in the MP group. There were no significant
differences in clinical outcome in terms of ability to perform a
straight-leg raise at 24 hours (p = 0.700), knee score (p = 0.952),
functional score (p = 0.229) and range of movement (p = 0.732) among
the groups. The number of outliers for all three radiological parameters
of mechanical axis, frontal femoral component alignment and frontal
tibial component alignment was significantly lower in the NA-QS
group than in the QS group (p = 0.008), but no outlier was found
in the MP group. In conclusion, even after the surgeon completed a substantial
number of cases before the commencement of this study, the supplementary
intra-operative use of computer-assisted navigation with QS-TKR
still gave inferior radiological results and longer operating time,
with a similar outcome at two years when compared with a MP approach. Cite this article:
