Tibial shaft fractures require surgical stabilization preferably by intramedullary nailing. However, patients often report functional limitations even years after the injury. This study investigates the influence of the surgical approach (transpatellar vs. parapatellar) on gait performance and patient reported outcome six months after surgery.

Twenty-two patients with tibial shaft fractures treated by intramedullary nailing through a transpatellar approach (TP: n=15, age 41±15, BMI 24±3) or a parapatellar approach (PP: n=7, age 34±15, BMI 23±2) and healthy, matched controls (n=22, age 39±13, BMI 24±2) were assessed by instrumented motion analysis six months after intramedullary nailing. Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire (SMFA) as well as kinematic and kinetic gait data were collected during level walking. Comparisons among approach methods and control group were performed by analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney test.

Six months after surgery, knee kinetics in both groups differed significantly compared to controls (p <.04). The approach method affected gait speed (TP: p = .002; PP: p = .08) and knee kinematics in the early stance phase (TP: p = .011; PP: p = .082), with the parapatellar approach showing a more favorable outcome. However, the difference between patient groups was not significant for any of the assessed gait parameters (p > .2). Also, no differences could be found in the bother index (BI) or function index (FI) of SMFA between surgical approach methods (BI: TP: Mdn = 7.2, PP: Mdn = 9.4; FI: TP: Mdn = 10.3, PP: Mdn = 9.2, p > .7).

Our study demonstrates, that six months after surgery for tibial shaft fractures functional limitations remain. These limitations appear not to be different for either a trans- or a parapatellar approach for the insertion of the intramedullary nail. The findings of this study are limited by the relatively short follow up time period and small number of patients. Future studies should investigate the source of the functional limitation after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures.

Abstract

Introduction

Proximal tibial fractures frequently present in combination with other injuries which also have to be treated surgically. Recent publications do not consider isolated proximal tibial fracture (mono-injury) and combined injuries which include tibial fractures as two seperate medical entities. We therefore asessed the influence of additional injuries on treatment and outcome of the proximal tibial fractures.

Objectives: Goal of this retrospective study is to evaluate risk factors, which lead to an osteitis of the tibia depending on the fracture location.

Methods: The study was initiated 01/2002. The study population consists of 104 patients including 14 women (13%). All of them suffered from an osteitis of the tibial. All of them are complications after traumatic open or closed fractures of the tibia, treated surgical. The average age of the patients has been 48 (± 18) years. In 28 cases there has been an acute osteitis of the tibia. In the other 76 patients the infection was not noticed before the ninth week after trauma. In all patients the risk factors were analyzed depending on the fracture configuration, the soft tissue situation, and the fracture location.

Results: All infections have been localized at the fracture level. The majority of the patients suffered from open tibial fractures (77.4%). 7.9% have been first, 23.6% second, and 68.5% third degree open fractures. Almost half of the fractures (48.1%) were located at the distal third of the tibia. Equally, 25.9% of the infections were localized in the medial and proximal third of the tibia. The percentage of open fractures leading to an osteitis was significant highest (p < 0.01) at the medial third of the tibia (91.3%), whereas the percentage of open proximal fractures has been 61.1% and open distal fractures 62%. The complexity of the fractures of the proximal, medial, and distal third of the tibia was very similar. The proportion of osteosynthesis with fixateur externe, plating, or naling showed no significant differences. 37.8% of the patients were smoker. The percentage of smoker was significant highest (p < 0.05) in the subgroup osteitis after closed tibial fracture (69.9%). The number of the other risk factors (Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, alcohol consumption, adipositas, PAD) was similar in all subgroups. There have been no differences between the 28 acute versus the 76 chronic osteitis.

Conclusion: The majority of the posttraumatic tibial osteitis is localised in the distal third. The most important risk factor for the development of a posttraumatic tibial osteitis is the dimension of the soft tissue defect. This is particularly true for the medial third of the tibia where the percentage of open fractures is significant highest. Additionally nicotine consumption is a major risk factor for the development of a posttraumatic tibial osteitis, particularly in cases of closed distal tibial fractures.

Objectives: An osteitis of the tibia remains a major problem especially in cases of open tibial fractures. A successful therapy management goes along with a radical bacterial eradication, sufficient soft tissue coverage, and a stable osseous reconstruction.

Methods: The study population consists of 112 patients (53 ± 13 years). All of them suffered from a tibial osteitis after fracture of the tibia. The study population was divided in patients with osteitis after open versus non open tibial fracture. The therapy strategy was the same in both groups. It was done according to a standardised treatment plan including radical surgical eradication of infectious and necrotic tissue, programmed lavage with vacuum sealing in combination with an effective bacterial antibiotic therapy. Surgical stabilization was done in cases of instability. Final osseous reconstruction and soft tissue coverage was performed if necessary after three negative intraoperative smears.

Results: 89 patients of the patients (79%) suffered form open tibial fractures versus 23 (21%) patients with non open fractures (NOF). The average inpatient treatment time was 13 ± 18 weeks in cases of osteitis after open tibial fractures and 8 ± 4 weeks after NOF. The average number of operative procedures after open fractures vs NOF was 10 ± 7 vs 8 ± 4. In 55 patients a muscle flap procedure was performed after open tibial fractures (53%) versus 9 (26%) after NOF. An amputation of the lower leg had to be done in 5 patients after open tibial fractures (5%) versus in 2 patients after NOF (6%). The rate of bacterial eradication with no recurrence of infection for at least one year was 53% in cases of osteitis after open tibial fracture and 65% after NOF.

Conclusion: An open fracture of the tibia is a major risk factor for developing a chronic osteitis. The eradication of bacterial infections takes a longer time and more operative procedures are necessary in cases of open tibial fractures versus closed fractures. In cases of open fractures there exists a higher need of soft tissue reconstruction by muscle flaps. After eradication there are no significant differences in the one year recurrence rate.

Since the introduction of carving skis, the injuries of the tibia is changing from simple fractures of the diaphyse to complex fractures of the epiphyses, according to high energy traumas. There are no studies about results of the treatment and consequences after winter sport accidents.

Method: Prospective documentation of all proximal tibia fractures after winter sport accidents, which were treated between 01.12.2006 and 31.04.2009 in the Trauma Department of the Klinikum Garmisch-Parten-kirchen, Germany. X-Rays and CT scans were classified according to the AO –Classification. Operations, complications, co-injuries and the hospital stay were analysed. We performed the Lysholm score, WOMAC Knee-score and the Tegner-index on the day of injury, 6 months, 12 months, and 2 years after injury.

Results: 78 patients had a proximal tibia fracture following a skiing accident, 36 Male and 42 female. All except two patients had a monotrauma of the proximal tibia. Mean age 46 ± 15 years. 17 types A.1.3, 41 types B and 18 types C3 fractures. 4 patients developed a compartment syndrome, one patient had a lesion of the n. peroneus. 65 patients were operated in our hospital. In 8 patients we performed a conservative treatment. The mean hospital stay was 12 ± 7.5 days. In 15 patients a menisci reconstruction was necessary. 6 patients had a postoperative complication: 3 thromboses, 2 cardiac decompensations, 1 wound healing problems. By now 42 patients were ready for follow-up. So far the mean follow-up time is 13.8 months. The Lysholm score was at 12 months (n= 22) 78 ± 20 points. The Tegner score was pre-injury 6.2 ± 1.1 and 12 months post-injury 4.1 ± 1,8. The results of the WOMAC score show an improvement in the subcategories pain and function in all patients. In the subcategory stiffness only the type A and B fractures show an improvement during the follow-up.

Conclusion: The proximal tibia joint fractures are a serious injury. The most patients’ activity level is tremendously reduced. The major problem after one year seems to be the ligament instability of the knee. A beginning knee arthritis after one year becomes relevant only in the type C fractures. More effort for the prevention of the proximal tibia fractures while skiing is necessary.