header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 137 - 137
1 Feb 2017
Gilbert J Grostefon J Mali S Kim J Ouellette E
Full Access

Introduction

Mechanically assisted crevice corrosion (MACC) of head-neck modular taper junctions is prevalent in virtually all head neck tapers in use today. To date, no clear in vitro tests of design, material or surgical elements of the modular taper system have been reported that show which factors principally affect MACC in these tapers. Possible elements include seating load, head-neck offset, surface roughness, taper engagement length, material combination, angular mismatch, and taper diameter. The goals of this study were to use an incremental fretting corrosion test method1 to assess the above 7 elements using a design of experiments approach. The hypothesis is that only one or two principal factors affect fretting corrosion.

Methods

A 27-2 design of experiment test (7 factors, ΒΌ factorial, n=32 total runs, 16 samples per condition per factor) was conducted. Factors included: Assembly Force (100, 4000N), Head Offset (1.5, 12 mm), Taper Locking Position (Mouth, Throat), Stem Taper Length (0.44, 0.54 in), Stem Taper Roughness (Ground, Ridged), Taper Diameter (9/10, 12/14), and Stem Material (CoCrMo, Ti-6Al-4V). The heads were CoCrMo coupled with taper coupons (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN). Test components were assembled wet and seated axially with 100 or 4000N assembly force. The assemblies were immersed in PBS and potentiostatically held at βˆ’50mV vs. Ag/AgCl. Incremental cyclic loads were applied vertically to the head at 3Hz until a 4000N maximum load was reached (See Fig. 1). Fretting currents at 4000 N cyclic load were used for comparisons while other parameters, including onset load, subsidence, micromotion and pull off load were also captured. Statistical analysis was performed using Pareto charts and Student's T-tests for single factor comparisons (P < 0.05 was statistically significant).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 523 - 523
1 Dec 2013
Latta L Sawardeker P Kam C Milne E Ouellette E
Full Access

INTRODUCTION:

Radial head arthroplasty is a reliable procedure with good functional outcomes when faced with irreparable radial head fractures. Since the first attempt at arthroplasty by Speed in 1941, there have been a variety of different designs created for radial head prostheses. There has been considerable recent interest in bipolar radial head components. However, to date, there have been few biomechanical studies comparing bipolar components to their monopolar counterparts. We examine the effects of alteration of axial length of the radial head prosthesis and force conveyed at the radiocapitellar joint in a head-to-head comparison of bipolar implants to monopolar implants.

METHODS:

Sixteen fresh-frozen, sided cadaveric arms were utilized. Radial heads were resected and either a monopolar, rigid, metal radial head prosthesis (Solar, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) was implanted or a bipolar metal prosthesis used (Katalyst, Integra, Plainsboro, NJ). Adjustments of radial head length were made in 2 mm increments using radiolucent washers to create an understuffed (βˆ’2), neutral (0), and overstuffed (+2, +4) effect, see Fig. 1. Forearms were cyclically loaded in compression from 13N to 130N with the forearm in neutral. Radiocapitellar forces were measured using Tekscan (Tekscan, Inc., Boston, MA) pressure sensors with radial head length set at βˆ’2 mm, 0, +2 mm and +4 mm and comparisons were made with the neutral (0) radial head, see Fig. 2. Multivariant ANOVA with Tukey's HSD correction was used for statistical analysis.