Background

While posterior cruciate retaining (PCR) implants are a more common total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design, newer bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) TKAs are now being considered as an option for many patients, especially those that are younger. While PCR TKAs remove the ACL, the BCR TKA designs keep both cruciate ligaments intact, as it is believed that the resection of the ACL greatly affects the overall kinematic patterns of TKA designs. Various fluoroscopic studies have focused on determination of kinematics but haven't defined differentiators that affect motion patterns. This research study assesses the importance of the cruciate ligaments and femoral geometry for Bi-Cruciate Retaining (BCR) and Posterior Cruciate Retaining (PCR) TKAs having the same femoral component, compared to the normal knee.

Introduction

Conventional hip radiographs allow surgeons, during preoperative planning, to make important decisions. Size and location of implants are routinely measured by overlaying schematics of the implanted components onto preoperative radiographs. Most currently available planning tools are in two-dimensions (2D), using X-ray images and 2D templates of the implants. Determination of the ideal component size requires two radiographic views of the femur: the anterior-posterior (AP) and the lateral direction. The surgeon uses this information to determine component sizes. Even though this approach has been used for many years leading to very good results, this manual process potentially carries multiple shortcomings. The biggest issue with the AP X-ray image is the fact that it is 2D in nature while the measurement's objective is to obtain three-dimensional (3D) parameters.

Introduction

Traditionally, conventional radiographs of the hip are used to assist surgeons during the preoperative planning process, and these processes generally involve two-dimensional X-ray images with implant templates. Unfortunately, while this technique has been used for many years, it is very manual and can lead to inaccurate fits, such as “good” fits in the frontal view but misalignment in the sagittal view. In order to overcome such shortcomings, it is necessary to fully describe the morphology of the femur in three dimensions, therefore allowing the surgeon to successfully view and fit the components from all possible angles.

Introduction

Untreated hip osteoarthritis is a debilitating condition leading to pain, bone deformation, and limited range of motion. Unfortunately, studies have not been conducted under in vivo conditions to determine progressive kinematics variations to a hip joint from normal to pre-operative and post-operative THA conditions. Therefore, the objective was this study was to quantify normal and degenerative hip kinematics, compared to post-operative hip kinematics.

Introduction

Obtaining accurate anatomical landmarks may lead to a better morphologic understanding, but this is challenging due to the variation of bony geometries. A manual approach, non-ideal for surgeons or engineers, requires a CT or MRI scan, and landmarks must be chosen based on the 3D representation of the scanned data. Ideally, anatomical landmarking is achieved using either a statistical shape model or template matching. Statistical modeling approaches require multitude of training data to capture population variation. Prediction of anatomical landmarks through template matching techniques has also been extensively investigated. These techniques are based on the minimization or maximization of an objective or cost function. As is the nature of non-rigid algorithms, these techniques can fail in the local maxima if the template and new bone models have noise or outliers. Therefore, a combination of rigid and non-rigid registration techniques is needed, in order to obtain accurate anatomical landmarks and improve the prediction process.

Introduction

Previous research defines the existence of a “safe zone” (SZ) pertaining to acetabular cup implantation during total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is believed that if the cup is implanted at 40°±10° inclination and 15°±10° anteversion, risk of dislocation is reduced. However, recent studies have documented that even when the acetabular cup is placed within the SZ, high incidence dislocation and instability remains due to the combination of patient-specific configuration, cup diameter, head size, and surgical approach. The SZ only investigates the angular orientation of the cup, ignoring translational location. Translational location of the cup can cause a mismatch between anatomical hip center and implanted cup center, which has not been widely explored.

Summary

The mathematical model has proven to be highly accurate in measuring leg length before and after surgery to determine how leg length effects hip joint mechanics.

Introduction

Many fluoroscopic studies on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have identified kinematic variabilities compared to the normal knee, with many subjects experiencing paradoxical motion patterns. The intent of this research study was to investigate the results of customized-individual-made (CIM) and off-the-shelf (OTS) PS and PCR TKA to determine kinematic variabilities and to assess these kinematic patterns with those previously documented for the normal knee.

Introduction

Hip osteoarthritis can be debilitating, often leading to pain, poor kinematics and limiting range of motion. While the in vivo kinematics of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) are well documented, there is limited information pertaining to the kinematics of native, non-arthritic (normal) hips and degenerative hips requiring a THA.

The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the in vivo kinematics of the normal hip with pre-operative, degenerative hips and post-operative THA.