The influence of patient age on functional outcomes after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for acetabular dysplasia remains unclear, with previous studies utilising scores developed for older, arthritic patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the influence of patient age on International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) scores, two years after PAO.

Eighty-six patients (72 female, 14 male; mean age 26.9 years) who underwent PAO by a single surgeon and had completed a minimum of two years follow up were identified. Patients were categorised into three groups according to age at the time of surgery: adolescent (11–20 years; n=29), young adult (21–30 years; n=29), and mature (≥31 years; n=28). The three groups were compared with respect to baseline variables and functional outcomes (iHOT-12, EQ-5D quality of life score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, pain visual analogue score (VAS)). Multivariate regression was undertaken to assess for independent predictors of two-year iHOT-12 score.

The adolescent group demonstrated a lower BMI (p=0.004) while the mature group had a greater American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) score (p=0.049). There were otherwise no significant differences in baseline variables between the three groups (all p>0.05).

The three groups demonstrated significant post-operative improvements across all functional outcome measures. There were no significant differences in two-year iHOT-12, EQ-5D, UCLA score or pain VAS between the three groups (all p>0.05). Regression modelling found that patient age at the time of surgery did not have an independent effect on two-year iHOT-12 score (p=0.878).

We found that patient age at the time of surgery did not influence functional outcomes two years after PAO. Our results suggest that patient age should not be considered in isolation as an indication or contraindication for PAO.

Higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation have been associated with worse health outcomes. The influence of socioeconomic deprivation on patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) has not previously been investigated.

A total of 217 patients (171 female, 46 male; median age 23.4 years) who underwent PAO by a single surgeon were identified. Patients were categorised into three groups according to their New Zealand Deprivation (NZDep) Index: minimal deprivation (NZDep Index 1–3, n=89), moderate deprivation (NZDep Index 4–6, n=94), and maximal deprivation (NZDep Index 7–10, n=34). The three groups were compared with respect to baseline variables, surgical details, complications, and pre-operative and two-year post-operative functional scores (including International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), EQ-5D quality of life score, and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score). Multivariate regression was undertaken to assess for the effect of NZDep Index on patient outcomes.

Patients in the maximal deprivation group were more likely to be Māori (p<0.001) and have surgery in a public rather than a private hospital (p=0.004), while the minimal deprivation group demonstrated a lower BMI (p=0.005). There were otherwise no other significant differences in baseline variables, surgical details, complications, nor pre-operative or two-year post-operative functional scores between the three groups (all p>0.05). Multivariate analysis identified a higher NZDep Index to be independently predictive of a lower pre-operative UCLA activity score (p=0.014) and a higher two-year iHOT-12 score (p<0.001).

Our results demonstrate an inequality in access to PAO, with patients exposed to higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation under-represented in our study population. When provided access to PAO, these vulnerable patients achieve significant functional improvement at least as great as patients with less socioeconomic deprivation. Initiatives to improve access to hip preservation care in socioeconomically deprived populations appear warranted.